Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:59:43.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Federal-Local Coordination in Homeland Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

By
Edward R. Maguire  and
William R. King
Edited by
Brian Forst ,
Jack R. Greene  and
James P. Lynch
Brian Forst
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Jack R. Greene
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
James P. Lynch
Affiliation:
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Any legislative change which would render … local and state law enforcement subservient to federal jurisdiction, would, in my opinion, be disastrous.

– J. Edgar Hoover 1954

[A]gencies at different levels of government will, as a generality, have different organizational cultures that are not ideally suited to the development of effective countermeasures against the crime and related problems each agency targets.

– William Geller and Norval Morris 1992

INTRODUCTION

Lack of coordination and cooperation between law enforcement officials at all levels of government has received prominent attention since the terrorist attacks on United States soil on September 11, 2001. The contentious relationship between the FBI and local police is depicted regularly in television and film; it is one of the stock Hollywood clichés in police and crime dramas. Local police have complained for many years about being patronized, alienated, upstaged, or simply ignored by FBI agents (Geller and Morris 1992). Whereas the relationship between the FBI and state and local police is the most obvious and visible issue in federal-local coordination for homeland security, the more general concern is how the federal government's entire alphabet soup of agencies can work cooperatively with local governments to secure the homeland. Concerns about terrorism have brought these issues to the forefront, with news reports, professional associations, think tanks, and government commissions all coming to similar conclusions: The linkages between federal and local agencies need significant improvement if we are to prevent terrorist incidents on American soil and enhance homeland security.

Type
Chapter
Information
Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security , pp. 322 - 356
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Catherine. 1990. An Exploratory Study of Conflict and Coordination in Interorganizational Service Delivery Systems. The Academy of Management Journal 33:478–502.Google Scholar
Arquilla, John, and Ronfeldt, David. 1996. The Advent of Netwar. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Arquilla, John, and Ronfeldt, David 2001. “Afterword (September 2001): The Sharpening Fight For the Future.” In Arquilla, John, and Ronfeldt, David., eds. Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy: 363–371. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
Bigley, Gregory A., and Roberts, Karlene H.. 2001. The Incident Command System: High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task Environments. Academy of Management Journal 44:1281–1300.Google Scholar
Breinholt, Jeff. 2003. Introduction. United States Attorney's Bulletin 51:1–41.Google Scholar
Buck, Dick A., Trainor, Joseph E., and Aguirre, Benigno E.. 2006. A Critical Evaluation of the Incident Command System and NIMS. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 3:Article 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, George W. 2002. The Department of Homeland Security. Washington, DC: The Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
Casey, James. 2004. Managing Joint Terrorism Task Force Resources. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin November:1–6.Google Scholar
,CNN.com. 2002a. “Maryland Police Release Hijacker Traffic Stop Video.” U.S. News, January 8, 2002. Retrieved November 6, 2006 from, http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/01/08/inv.hijacker.video/index.html
,CNN.com 2002b. “Another Hijacker was Stopped for Traffic Violation.” U.S. News, January 9, 2002. Retrieved October 30, 2006 from, http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/01/09/inv.hijacker.traffic.stops/index.html
Cook, K.S., and Whitmeyer, J.M.. 1992. Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology 18:109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denning, Peter J. 2006. Hastily Formed Networks. Communications of the ACM 49:15–20.Google Scholar
,Department of Homeland Security. n.d. Fact Sheet: Office of State and Local Government Coordination and Preparedness. Retrieved October 10, 2006 from, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/slgcpfactsheet.pdf
,Department of Homeland Security 2008. TOPOFF: Exercising National Preparedness. Retrieved August 4, 2009 from, http://www.dhs.gov/files/training/gc_1179350946764.shtm
Eddy, R.P. 2005, July 8. In the End All Terrorism is Local. The Times Online. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,1072–1684947,00.html
,Federal Bureau of Investigation. n.d. Office of Law Enforcement Coordination. Retrieved November 6, 2006 from, http://www.fbi.gov/hq/olec/olec.htm
,Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2002. Press Release, April 11, 2002. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel02/mueller041102.htm
,Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2003. Facts and Figures 2003: FBI Special Agents and Employees: What It Takes to Work for the FBI. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.fbi.gov/libref/factsfigure/employ.htm
,Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2004a. Protecting America Against Terrorist Attacks: A Closer Look at the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.fbi.gov/page2/dec04/jttf120114.htm
,Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2004b. Protecting America from Terrorist Attack: Meet the National Joint Terrorism Task Force. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.fbi.gov/page2/july04/njttf070204.htm
Friel, Charles M. 2000. “A Century of Changing Boundaries.” Criminal Justice 2000: Volume 2 – Boundary Changes in Criminal Justice Organizations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Geller, William A., and Morris, Norval. 1992. “Relations between Federal and Local Police.” In Tonry, Michael and Morris, Norval, eds. Modern Policing: 231–348. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilcher, Ronald O. 2001. Two Oklahoma City Disasters: The Oklahoma City bombing and the tornadoes – a blood bank perspective. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings 14:140–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commission, Gilmore. 2000. Toward a National Strategy for Combating Terrorism. Second Annual Report to the President and the Congress of the Advisory Panel to Assess Domestic Response Capabilities for Terrorism Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.rand.org/nsrd/terrpanel/terror2.pdf
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gormley, William T. 2002. “Reflections on Terrorism and Public Management.” In Roberts, Alasdair, ed. Governance and Public Security: 1–16. Syracuse, NY: Campbell Public Affairs Institute, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1983. The Strength of Weak Ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1:201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissett, Sheila. 2005. “FEMA Pulled Jeff's Plug: Antenna unhooked days after Katrina.” Times-Picayune (New Orleans), October 12, 2005.
Herbert, Steve. 1996. Policing Space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hirschkorn, Phil, and Feyerick, Deborah. 2004. “Feds to Start Sharing Terrorism Data: New York and Vermont cops will get access to watch lists.” CNN.com, December 15, 2000. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/05/25/fbi.sharing.data/index.html
Hoover, John Edgar. 1954. The Basis of Sound Law Enforcement. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 291:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, John, Domke, David, Billeaudeaux, Andre, and Garland, Philip. 2004. U.S. National Identity, Political Elites, and a Patriotic Press Following September 11. Political Communication 21:27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapucu, Naim. 2009. Interorganizational Coordination in Complex Environments of Disasters: The evolution of intergovernmental disaster response systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 6:Article 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Aaron, Staiti, Andrea B., and McKenzie, Kelly L.. 2006. Preparing for the Unknown, Responding to the Known: Communities and public health preparedness. Health Affairs 25:946–957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, Charles M. 2003. Issues in the Production and Dissemination of Gang Statistics: An ethnographic study of a large midwestern gang unit. Crime and Delinquency 49:485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Raymond W. 2004. Testimony of Raymond W. Kelly, Police Commissioner of the City of New York, before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/ congress/9–11_commission/040518- kelly.pdf
Klinger, David A., and Grossman, David. 2002. Who Should Deal with Foreign Terrorists on U.S. Soil?: Socio-legal consequences of September 11 and the ongoing threat of terrorist attacks in America. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 25:815–834.Google Scholar
Krebs, Valdis E. 2001. Mapping Networks of Terrorist Cells. Connections 24:43–52.Google Scholar
Lardner, John, and Repetto, Thomas. 2001. NYPD: A City and its Police. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Richard C. 1998. To Serve and Collect: Chicago Politics and Police Corruption from the Lager Beer Riot to the Summerdale Scandal, 1855–1960. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, Edward R., and King, William R.. 2004. Trends in the Policing Industry. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593:15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Peter K. 1977. Police Work: The Social Organization of Police Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Manzi, Catherine, Powers, Michael J., and Zetterlund, Kristina. 2002. Critical Information Flows in the Alfred P. Murrah Building Bombing: A Case Study. Washington, DC: Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.mipt.org/pdf/murrahcasestudy.pdf
McCall, William. 2005. “Portland First City to Withdraw from FBI Task Force,” Associated Press (April 25).
MuellerIII, Robert S. 2002. Statement for the Record: FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III, Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2002_hr/092602mueller.html
Murphy, Gerard R., and Plotkin, Martha R.. 2003, March. Protecting your Community from Terrorism: The Strategies for Local Law Enforcement Series. Vol. 1: Improving local-federal partnerships. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
,National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. n.d. Reforming Law Enforcement, Counterterrorism, and Intelligence Collection in the United States, Staff Statement No. 12. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.9–11commission.gov/staff_statements/staff_statement_12.pdf
,National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
,Office of the Inspector General. 2005. The Department of Justice's Terrorism Task Forces, Evaluation and Inspections Report I-2005–007. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/plus/e0507/intro.htm
Oliver, Amalya L., and Ebers, Mark. 1998. Networking Network Studies: An analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies 19:549–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Thomas P., and Hymel, Gary. 1994. All Politics is Local: And Other Rules of the Game. Holbrook, MA: Bob Adams, Inc.Google Scholar
Objects, Oregon. 2001. A News Hour with Jim Lehrer Transcript. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/july-dec01/oregon_12–17.html
Perrow, Charles. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High-risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books. [2nd edition from Princeton Univ. Press in 1999].Google Scholar
Forum, Police Executive Research. 2004. National Policy Summit: Building private security/public policing partnerships to prevent and respond to terrorism and public disorder. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Reaves, Brian A. 2007. Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Richman, Daniel C. 2000. The Changing Boundaries between Federal and Local Law Enforcement. Criminal Justice 2000: Volume 2 – Boundary Changes in Criminal Justice Organizations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Riley, Kevin Jack, and Hoffman, Bruce. 1995. Domestic Terrorism: A National Assessment of State and Local Preparedness. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Sageman, Marc. 2004. Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salancik, Gerald R. 1995. WANTED: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Christopher J., and Klinger, David A.. 2006. Altering the Posse Comitatus Act: Letting the military address terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Creighton Law Review 39:667–693.Google Scholar
Shrum, W. 1990. Status Incongruence Among Boundary Spanners: Structure, exchange, and conflict. American Sociological Review 55:496–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, Wesely, and Frydl, Kathleen. 2004. Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, Wesley, and Hartnett, Susan. 1997. Community Policing, Chicago Style, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skoler, Daniel. 1977. Organizing the Non-System: Governmental Structuring of the Criminal Justice Systems. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Stanek, Rich. 2003. Essay: Terrorism: Minnesota Responds to the Clear and Present Danger. Saint Paul: Minnesota Commissioner of the Department of Public Safety, Minnesota House of Representatives.Google Scholar
Thacher, David. 2004. Interorganizational Partnerships as Inchoate Hierarchies: A case study of the community security initiative. Administration & Society 36:91–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacher, David 2005. The Local Role in Homeland Security. Law & Society Review 39:635–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theoharis, Athan. 2004. The FBI and American Democracy: A Brief Critical History. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Reports, Trac. 2006. International Terrorism Prosecutions for November 2006. Retrieved July 30, 2009 from, http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/bulletins/intterror/monthlynov06/fil/
Tsvetovat, Maksim. and Carley, Kathleen M.. 2005. Structural Knowledge and Success of Anti-Terrorist Activity: The downside of structural equivalence. Journal of Social Structure 6.Google Scholar
Tucker, Phebe, Pfefferbaum, Betty, Vincent, Robert, Boehler, Sharron D., and Nixon, Sara Jo. 1998. Oklahoma City: Disaster challenges mental health and medical administrators. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 25:93–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,U.S. Census Bureau. n.d. Glossary. Retrieved July 30, 2009 from, http://factfinder.census.gov/home/en/epss/glossary_p.html
,U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Census 2000 Tabulation Entity Counts of Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places. Retrieved July 30, 2009 from, http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tallies/ctytally.html
,U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2004. National Response Plan. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NRP_FullText.pdf
,U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General. 2005. Review of the Terrorist Screening Center. Audit Report #: 05–27.
,U.S. General Accounting Office. 2006. Terrorist Watch List Screening: Efforts to Help Reduce Adverse Effects on the Public. Report #: GAO-06–1031.
WaughJr., William L. 2006. The Political Costs of Failure in the Katrina and Rita Disasters. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604:10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, Karl. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
House, The White. 2001. President says U.S. Attorneys on Front Line in War. Retrieved on September 9, 2010 from, http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/speeches/speech_0041.shtm
Wilson, James Q. 1978. The Investigators: Managing FBI and Narcotics Agents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Winthrop, , Jim. 1997. The Oklahoma City Bombing: Immediate response authority and other military assistance to civil authority. The Army Lawyer, pp. 1–15. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from, http://www.mipt.org/pdf/okcbombira_maca.pdf
Woods, Gerald. 1993. The Police in Los Angeles: Reform and Professionalization. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Zanini, Michele, and Edwards, Sean J.A.. 2001. “The Networking of Terror in the Information Age.” In Arquilla, John, and Ronfeldt, David, eds. Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy: 29–60. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
Zeller, Shawn. 2004. Calling the Cops. Retrieved October 31, 2006 from http://www.govexec.com/features/0304/0304s2.htm

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×