Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:02:38.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Visual Eroticism, Poetic Voyeurism: Ekphrasis and the Complexities of Patronage in Góngora's Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea

from Part I - Patronage, Audiences and Cultural Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Lucia Binotti
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Get access

Summary

Luis de Góngora y Argote's mythological poem Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea has received uninterrupted attention since it first circulated in manuscript at the court of Madrid in 1613. At the time, the object – along with Góngora's other long poem, Soledades – of fiery and scandalized repulsion as much as of exultant praise, Polifemo today is considered a masterwork of Spanish Baroque poetry.

Based on the Ovidian fable of the ill-fated love between the nymph Galatea and the young shepherd Acis, the poem departs from and expands upon Ovid's version, focusing on the amorous encounter that will bring about the couple's tragic demise as Acis is crushed with a boulder by the jealous cyclops Polyphemus. Formally the poem is characterized by its extreme linguistic and rhetorical complexity. It reads as a maze of convoluted metaphors that seem to spring one from the other endlessly. This maze creates a multi-leveled game of cross-referencing and compels the reader to maintain a dialogic tension with the rich constellation of Classical texts that support the poem. Reinforcing this metaphorical pregnancy, the Polifemo conspicuously bends the canonical rules of Renaissance poetic language, multiplying rhetorical figures such as alliteration, hyperbole, oxymoron and so on, while bending the syntactical rules of Spanish with violently deforming hyperbaton. Grandiose in its engaging imagery and in its linguistic experimentation, but often obscure to the point of inaccessibility, the poem has defied comprehensive interpretation. Its vast modern bibliography, dominated by studies focused on discrete thematic, stylistic and ideological themes, resembles a heavily faulted topography.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×