Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:38:52.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Creativity in the Classroom: The Dark Side

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Arthur J. Cropley
Edited by
David H. Cropley ,
Arthur J. Cropley ,
James C. Kaufman  and
Mark A. Runco
Arthur J. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
David H. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Arthur J. Cropley
Affiliation:
University of Hamburg
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
California State University at San Bernardino
Mark A. Runco
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

TEACHERS' AMBIVALENCE ABOUT CREATIVE CHILDREN

Ng and Smith (2004, p. 87) asked the question at the heart of this chapter: “Why is there a paradox in promoting creativity in the … classroom?” Put simply, the paradox is that most teachers express strong approval of creativity in theory, as already shown over 30 years ago (Feldhusen & Treffinger, 1975) and repeated more recently by Runco, Johnson, and Bear (1993). However, in practice, the situation is different. Although they claim that they enjoy having creative children in their classroom, and indeed, as will be shown below, creative students are often very successful learners, teachers (Dawson, D'Andrea, Affinito, & Westby, 1999)

  • dislike characteristics associated with creativity and

  • not seldom express disapproval or even dislike of the students in their classes who are most creative or score highest on creativity tests.

As Westby and Dawson (1995) showed, many teachers who claimed to have a favorable view of creative children almost bizarrely described them as “conforming,” something that Brady (1970) had already reported early in the modern creativity era. As Smith and Carlsson (2006, p. 222) put it, “… teachers seem to have a confused picture of what is a favorite pupil and what is a creative pupil.” When the teachers in the Westby and Dawson (1995) study were given adjectives describing traits more typical of what creative children are really like (e.g., risk-taking, curious), they said that they disliked such youngsters (see also Aljughaiman & Mowrer-Reynolds, 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Dark Side of Creativity , pp. 297 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ai, , X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 329–327.CrossRef
Aljughaiman, A. & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, N. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.Google ScholarPubMed
Barron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Brady, E. B. (1970). The effects of creativity and intelligence on teacher ratings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, 342–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandau, H., Daghofer, F., Hollerer, L., Kaschnitz, W., Kellner, K., Kirchmair, G., et al. (2007). The relationship between creativity, teacher ratings on behavior, age, and gender in pupils from seven to ten years. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, H. (1985). Gleichheitswahn Parteienwahn [Sameness psychosis]. Tübingen: Hohenrain.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. & Butcher, H. J. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W. & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers' perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, A. R. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (1990). Creativity and mental health in everyday life. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2005). Creativity and problem-solving: Implications for classroom assessment (24th Vernon-Wall Lecture, Glasgow, November 6, 2004). Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organization. Mahwah, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H. & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. and Baer, J. (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H. & Cropley, A. J. (2009). Recognizing and fostering creativity in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education (in press).
Dacey, J. S. (1989). Fundamentals of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Dawson, V. L., D'Andrea, , T., Affinito, R., & Westby, E. L. (1999). Predicting creative behavior: A reexamination of the divergence between traditional and teacher-defined concepts of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 57–66.CrossRef
Dellas, M. & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. J. (1997). Creativity and personality. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook, Vol. 1 (pp. 41–66). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Fasko, D. (2000–2001). Education and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldhusen, J. F. & Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teachers' attitudes and practices in teaching creativity and problem solving to economically disadvantaged and minority children. Psychological Reports, 37, 1161–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glück, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, W. (1987). Auswirkungen verschiedener Fussballtrainingsstile auf Leistungsmotivation [Effects of different styles for coaching football on motivation]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hamburg.
Howieson, N. (1984). Is Western Australia neglecting the creative potential of its youth? Paper presented at the 1984 Annual Conference of the Australian Psychological Society, Perth, August 12–17.
Jamison, K. R. (1993). Touched with fire: Depressive illness and the artistic temperament. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Karwowksi, M. (2007). Teachers' nominations of students' creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid?Social Sciences, 2, 264–269.Google Scholar
Lau, S. & Li, W. L. (1996). Peer status and perceived creativity: Are popular children viewed by peers and teachers as creative?Creativity Research Journal, 9, 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. I. (1992). Scientific creativity: A comparative study of Henri Poincaré and Albert Einstein. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, L. J. & Freeman, H. (2002). Role expectations as constraints to innovation: The case of female managers. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herald, Morning. (1904). Adelaide University examinations. Morning Herald, October 15, 1904, p. 17.Google Scholar
Moustakis, C. E. (1977). Creative life. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. & Moertl, P. (2003). Cases of social innovation: Lessons from two innovations in the 20th century. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. & Jang, K. (2005). Analysis of the actual scientific inquiries of physicists. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0506191. Accessed September 17, 2006.
Ng, A. K. & Smith, J. (2004). Why is there a paradox in promoting creativity in the Asian classroom? In S. Lau, A.Hui, N. N., and Ng, G. Y. C. (Eds.), Creativity: When East meets West (pp. 87–112). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Obuche, N. M. (1986). The ideal pupil as perceived by Nigerian (Igbo) teachers and Torrance's creative personality. International Review of Education, 32, 191–196.Google Scholar
Oral, G. & Guncer, B. (1993). Relationship between creativity and nonconformity to school discipline as perceived by teachers of Turkish elementary school children, by controlling for their grade and sex. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 20, 208–214.Google Scholar
Pleschovà, G. (2007, January). Unusual assignments as a motivation tool. Paper presented at the conference Creativity or Conformity? Building Cultures of Creativity in Higher Education, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, UK. Available at www.creativityconference.org/presented_papers/Pleschova_Unusual.doc. Accessed November 17, 2007.
Runco, M. A. & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.Google Scholar
Schuldberg, D. (2000–2001). Six sub-clinical spectrum traits in normal creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers' biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Historiometric studies of creative genius. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook, Vol. 1 (pp. 3–28). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stone, B. G. (1980). Relationship between creativity and classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 106–108.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. J. W. & Carlsson, I. (2006). Creativity under the Northern Lights: Perspectives from Scandinavia. In Kaufman, J. C. and Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), International handbook of creativity (pp. 202–234). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 14–21.Google Scholar
Suchman, J. R. (1961). Inquiry training: Building skills for autonomous discovery. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 7, 147–169.Google Scholar
Tan, A. G. (2003). Student teachers' perceptions of student behaviors for fostering creativity: A perspective on the academically low achievers. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 13, 59–71.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1963a). The creative personality and the ideal pupil. Teachers College Record, 65, 220–226.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1963b). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Westby, E. L. & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom?Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×