Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I How to Understand Childhoods in the Postcolonial Context
- Part II Children Under Colonial and Postcolonial Rule
- Part III Children’s Rights and the Decolonization of Childhoods
- Epilogue: Childhoods and Children’s Rights Beyond Postcolonial Paternalism
- References
- Index
5 - Racist Civilization of Children in Latin America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 March 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I How to Understand Childhoods in the Postcolonial Context
- Part II Children Under Colonial and Postcolonial Rule
- Part III Children’s Rights and the Decolonization of Childhoods
- Epilogue: Childhoods and Children’s Rights Beyond Postcolonial Paternalism
- References
- Index
Summary
The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins, signaled the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production. (Karl Marx, Das Kapital, Vol. I, Chapter 24, p 790)
Introduction
The colonization of the subcontinent that is now called Latin America first took the form of exploitation colonies. It was aimed at the exploitation of natural resources in favour of the European colonial powers, especially Spain and Portugal. With the massive immigration of European migrants and the recruitment of slaves from Africa, the colonies in this subcontinent gradually changed to settler colonies. They were at first dominated by the minority of invaders and colonists who saw themselves as ‘whites’, and took the right to exploit the indigenous so-called Indian and black populations at their own expense. In contrast to North America, Australia and New Zealand, where separation prevailed, the conquest of the southern subcontinent from the beginning went hand in hand with an extensive biological intermarriage between the colonists on the one hand and the indigenous and African populations, predominantly their women, on the other (Spanish mestizaje, Portuguese mestiçagem). This mixing continued after the formation of independent Latin American republics from the beginning of the 19th century, but without first changing the supremacy of the descendants of the ‘white’ conquerors (criollos). This fact has led critics to emphasize that the ‘first’ must be followed by a ‘second’ independence, in which their racist legitimacy is ended.
Similar to the colonization of Africa, the European conquerors have equated the colonized population with children (see Ashcroft, 2001: 36– 53). In the Viceroyalty of Peru, for example, the Spanish authorities – the state as well as the ecclesiastical – have often characterized the indigenous peoples of the Andes as childish. The cultural historian Carolyn Dean (2002: 21) describes this as follows:
Infantilizing analogies not only justified paternalistic attitudes on the part of the colonizers but also legitimized political domination; children, after all, do not have the same social rights as grown-ups and can (and frequently ought to) be controlled by adults.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Decolonizing ChildhoodsFrom Exclusion to Dignity, pp. 87 - 98Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2020