Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 7
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
April 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781107338630

Book description

This book sets forth a new approach to twenty-first-century criminal justice and punishment, one that fully involves the community, providing a better way to make our criminal process more transparent and inclusive. Using the prism of the Sixth Amendment community jury trial, this book offers fresh and much-needed ways to incorporate the citizenry into the procedures of criminal justice, thereby resulting in greater investment and satisfaction in the system. It exposes the various challenges the American criminal justice system faces because of its ongoing failure to integrate the community's voice. Ultimately, the people's right to participate in the criminal justice system through the criminal jury - a right that is all too often overlooked - is essential to truly legitimizing the criminal process and ensuring its democratic nature.

Reviews

'American criminal justice is adrift from its moral, democratic roots. In Defending the Jury, Laura Appleman shines a light on the many shadowy stages of America’s impersonal, lawyer-run, plea bargaining assembly line. She explores the historic importance of juries as the conscience of the community; traces how criminal-justice insiders have steadily displaced outsiders’ common-sense perspectives; and makes a strong case for better including citizens’ voices at every stage, from bail through guilty plea, sentencing, and probation or parole. Clearly yet passionately written, Defending the Jury is a must-read for everyone concerned with America’s broken criminal justice machine.'

Stephanos Bibas - University of Pennsylvania, author of The Machinery of Criminal Justice

'Veteran litigators regard trying a case to a jury as the greatest thrill - but it's one that fewer and fewer lawyers experience, in today's age of bureaucratized, paper-pushing justice. Laura Appleman's innovative and thoughtful reform proposals, in addition to restoring the voice of the community to punishment, might also make practicing law more fulfilling and enjoyable for lawyers.'

David B. Lat - former AUSA (federal prosecutor) and Managing Editor of Above the Law, www.abovethelaw.com

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Selected Bibliography
Abramson, Jeffrey, We, the Jury: The Jury system and the ideal of Democracy (2001).
Alfieri, Anthony V., Community Prosecutors, 90 Cal. L. Rev. 1465 (2002).
Alschuler, Albert W., The Changing Plea Bargaining Debate, 69 Cal. L. Rev. 652 (1981).
Alschuler, Albert W., Plea Bargaining and Its History, 13 Law & Soc’y211 (1979).
Alschuler, Albert W., The Defense Attorney’s Role in Plea Bargaining, 84 Yale L.J. 1179 (1975).
Alschuler, Albert W., The Trial Judge’s Role in Plea Bargaining, 76 Colum. L. Rev. 1059 (1976).
Alschuler, Albert W., The Prosecutor’s Role in Plea Bargaining, 36 U. Chi. L. Rev. 50 (1968).
Alschuler, Albert W. & Schulhofer, Stephen J., Antiquated Procedures or Bedrock Rights? A Response to Professors Meares and Kahan, 1998 U. Chi. Legal F. 215, 216 (1998).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By (2013).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction (1998).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, The Constitution and Criminal Procedure (1998).
Amar, Ahkil Reed, The Bill of Rights as a Constitution, 100 Yale L.J. 1131 (1991).
Andenaes, Johannes, Punishment and Deterrence (1974).
Ashworth, Andrew, Victim Impact Statements and Sentencing, Crim. L. Rev. 498 (1993).
Bamonte, Thomas J., The Viability of Morrisey v. Brewer and the Due Process Rights of Parolees and Other Conditional Releasees, 18 S. Ill. U. L.J. 121 (1993).
Bandes, Susan, Empathy, Narrative and Victim Impact Statements, 63 U. Chi. L. Rev. 361 (1996).
Baradaran, Shima & McIntyre, Frank, Race, Prediction & Pretrial Detention, 10 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 741 (2014).
Baradaran, Shima & McIntyre, Frank, Predicting Violence, 90 Tex. L. Rev. 497 (2012).
Barkow, Rachel E., The Ascent of the Administrative State and the Demise of Mercy, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1332 (2008).
Barkow, Rachel E., Federalism and the Politics of Sentencing, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1276 (2005).
Barkow, Rachel E., Recharging the Jury: The Criminal Jury’s Constitutional Role in an Era of Mandatory Sentencing, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 33 (2003).
Barron, David, The Promise of Cooley’s City: Traces of Local Constitutionalism, 147 U. Pa. L. Rev. 487 (1999).
Barsumian, Todd, Note, Bail Bondsmen and Bounty Hunters: Re-Examining the Right to Recapture, 47 Drake L. Rev. 877, 887–88 (1999).
Beccaria, Cesare, An Essay on Crimes and Punishments (Philadelphia, R. Bell 1778).
Berman, Greg & Fox, Audrey, From the Margins to the Mainstream: Community Justice at the Crossroads, 22 Jus. Sys. J. 189 (2001).
Bibas, Stephanos, The Machinery of Criminal Justice (2012).
Bibas, Stephanos, Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2464 (2004).
Bibas, Stephanos, Harmonizing Substantive-Criminal-Law Values and Criminal Procedure: The Case of Alford and Nolo Contendere Pleas, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 1361 (2003).
Bibas, Stephanos, The Real World Shift in Criminal Procedure, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 789 (2003).
Bibas, Stephanos & Bierschbach, Richard A., Integrating Remorse and Apology into Criminal Procedure, 114 Yale L.J. 85 (2004).
Billings, Warren M., Law in Colonial America: The Reassessment of Early American Legal History, 81 Mich. L. Rev. 953 (1983).
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765).
Blinka, Daniel D., Jefferson and Juries: The Problem of Law, Reason, and Politics in the New Republic, 47 Am. J. of Legal Hist. 35 (2005).
Bodenhamer, David J., Fair Trial: Rights of the Accused in American History 86 (1992).
Boorstin, Daniel J., The Americans: The Colonial Experience 27 (1958).
Bowers, Josh, Punishing the Innocent, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1117 (2008).
Bowers, Josh & Robinson, Paul H., Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: The Shared Aims and Occasional Conflicts of Legitimacy and Moral Credibility, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 211 (2012).
Braithwaite, John, Holism, Justice and Atonement, 2003 Utah L. Rev. 389.
Brenner, Susan W., Towards a Criminal Law for Cyberspace: Distributed Security, 10 Boston U. J. of Science & Tech. L. 1, 65 (2004).
Brown, Darryl, The Perverse Effects of Efficiency in Criminal Process, 81 Va. L. Rev. 183 (2014).
Burke, Alafair & Green, Bruce, The Community Prosecutor: Questions of Professional Discretion, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 285 (2012).
Butler, Paul, Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, 105 Yale L. J. 677 (1995).
Carroll, Jenny, Nullification as Law, 102 Geo. L. J. 579 (2014).
Chablani, Sanjay K., Re-Framing the ‘Fair Cross-Section’ Requirement, 13 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 931 (2011).
Chanenson, Steven L., Guidance from Above and Beyond, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 175 (2005).
Chanenson, Steven L., The Next Era of Sentencing Reform, 54 Emory L. J.377 (2005).
Coke, Sir Edward, Institutes of the Laws of England (19th ed., Garland Publishing 1979) (1644).
Colquitt, Joseph A., Ad Hoc Plea Bargaining, 75 Tul. L. Rev. 695, 740 (2001).
Connor, Henry G., The Constitutional Right to a Trial by a Jury of the Vicinage, 57 U. Pa. L. Rev. 197 (1909).
Cooter, Robert, Expressive Law and Economics, 27 J. Legal Stud. 585 (1998).
Dancig-Rosenberg, Hadar & Gal, Tali, Restorative Criminal Justice, 34 Cardozo L. Rev. 2313 (2013).
Dolinko, David, The Theory and Jurisprudence of Restorative Justice, 2003 Utah L. Rev. 319.
Dubber, Markus D., American Plea Bargains, German Lay Judges, and the Crisis of Criminal Procedure, 49 Stan. L. Rev. 547 (1997).
Duff, R. A., Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment, in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (1996).
Duff, R. A., Punishment, Communication, and Community (Oxford 2001).
English Bill of Rights (Dec. 16, 1689).
Fagan, Jeffrey & Meares, Tracey L., Punishment, Deterrence and Social Control: The Paradox of Punishment in Minority Communities, 6 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 173 (2008).
Fairfax, Roger A., Jury, Grand 2.0: Modern Perspectives on the Grand Jury (2010).
Fairfax, Roger A., Grand Jury Discretion and Constitutional Design, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 703 (2008).
Fairfax, Roger A., The Grand Jury’s Jurisdictional Heritage, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 398 (2006).
Ferguson, Andrew G., The Jury as Constitutional Identity, 47 U.C. Davis1105 (2014).
Fischer, George, Plea Bargaining’s Triumph (2003).
Fissell, Brenner M., Abstract Risk and the Politics of the Criminal Law, 51 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 657 (2014).
Forde-Mazrui, Kim, Jural Districting: Selecting Impartial Juries Through Community Representation, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 353 (1999).
Freeland, Stephen N., Note, The Invisible Badge: Why Bounty Hunters Should Be Regarded as State Actors Under the Symbiotic Relationship Test, 49 Washburn L.J. 201 (2010).
Friedman, Lawrence M., Crime and Punishment in American History (1993).
Frug, Jerry, The Geography of Community, 48 Stanford L. Rev. 1047 (1996).
Frug, Jerry, Decentering Decentralization, 60 U. Chi. L. Rev. 253 (1993).
Garrett, Brandon L., Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong (2011).
Garvey, Stephen P., Is It Wrong to Commute Death Row? Retribution, Atonement and Mercy, 82 N. Carolina L. Rev. 1319 (2004).
Garvey, Stephen P., Punishment as Atonement, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1801 (1999).
Gastil, John, Perry Dress, Phil Weiser & Cindy Simmons, The Jury And Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement And Political Participation (2010).
Goebel, Julius, King’s Law and Local Custom in 17th Century New England, 31 Colum. L. Rev. 416 (1931).
Goldstein, Abraham S., Converging Criminal Justice Systems: Guilty Pleas and the Public Interest, 49 S.M.U. L. Rev. 567 (1996).
Gottfredson, Michael R. & Gottfredson, Don M., Decisionmaking in Criminal Justice: Towards the Rational Exercise of Discretion (1980).
Gottschalk, Marie, The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America (2006).
Greenberg, Douglas, Crime, Law Enforcement, and Social Control in Colonial America, 26 Am. J. Legal Hist. 293 (1982).
Gruber, Aya, A Distributive Theory of Criminal Law, 52 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1 (2010).
Guthrie, Chris, Misjudging, 7 Nev. L. Rev. 420 (2007).
Hale, Matthew, The History of the Common Law of England (1713).
Haley, John O., Beyond Retribution: An Integrated Approach to Restorative Justice, 36 Wash. U. L & Pol’y1 (2011).
Hall, Kermit L., Finkelman, Paul & Ely, James W., American Legal History (2010).
Hampton, Jean, Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution, 39 UCLA L. Rev. 1659 (1992).
Hampton, Jean, A New Theory of Retribution, in Liability and Responsibility: Essays in Law and Morals 377 (Frey, R. G. & Morris, Christopher W., eds., 1991).
Hans, Valerie P., Introduction: Citizens as Legal Decision Makers: An International Perspective, 40 Cornell Int’l L.J. 303 (2007).
Hawkins, Keith, Assessing Evil: Decision Behavior and Parole Board Justice, 23 British J. of Crim. 102 (1983).
Herman, G. Nicholas, Plea Bargaining 26 (2004).
Howe, Mark DeWolfe, Juries as Judges of Criminal Law, 52 Harv. L. Rev. 582 (1939).
Huighens, Kyron, Liberalism, Normative Expectations, and the Mechanics of Fault, 69 Mod. L. Rev. 462, 477 (2006).
Jacobson, Michael, Downsizing Prisons: How to Reduce Crime and End Mass Incarceration (1995).
Johnson, Marcia & Johnson, Luckett A., Bail: Reforming Policies to Address Overcrowded Jails, the Impact of Race on Detention, and Community Revival in Harris County, Texas, 7 Nw. J. of L. & Soc. Pol’y42 (2012).
Kalven, Harry, The Dignity of the Civil Jury, 50 Va. L. Rev. 1055 (1964).
Kant, Immanuel, The Philosophy Of Law (1887).
Katyal, Neal K., Digital Architecture as Crime Control, 112 Yale L.J. 2261 (2003).
Katyal, Neal K., Criminal Law in Cyberspace, 149 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1003 (2001).
King, Nancy J., Priceless Process: Nonnegotiable Features of Criminal Litigation, 47 UCLA L. Rev. 113 (1999).
King, Nancy J., Silencing Nullification: Advocacy Inside the Jury Room and Outside the Courtroom, 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 433 (1998).
King, Nancy J., Soulé, David A., Steen, Sara & Weidner, Robert R., When Process Affects Punishment: Differences in Sentences After Guilty Plea, Bench Trial, and Jury Trial in Five Guidelines States, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 959 (2005).
King, Nancy J. & Noble, Roosevelt L., Jury Sentencing in Non-Capital Cases: Comparing Severity and Variance with Judicial Sentences in Two States, 2 J. Empirical Leg. Stud. 331 (2005).
Kipnis, Kenneth, Plea Bargaining, A Critic’s Rejoinder, 13 Law & Soc’y Rev. 555 (1979).
Klein, Susan R., Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentencing Bargaining, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 2023 (2006).
Klingele, Cecilia, The Role of Sentencing Commissions in the Imposition and Enforcement of Release Conditions, 26 Fed. Sent. Rep. 191 (2014).
Kobil, Daniel T., The Quality of Mercy Strained: Wresting the Pardoning Power from the King, 69 Tex. L. Rev. 569 (1991).
Kollock, Peter & Smith, Marc A., Communities in Cyberspace (1998).
LaCroix, Alison, The Ideological Origins of American Federalism (2010).
Langbein, John H., The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (2003).
Langbein, John H., On the Myth of Written Constitutions: The Disappearance of Criminal Jury Trial, 15 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y119, 120 (1992).
Langbein, John H., Shaping the Eighteenth-Century Criminal Trial: A View from the Ryder Sources, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1 (1983).
Langbein, John H., Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining, 13 Law & Soc’y Rev. 261 (1979).
Langbein, John H., Land Without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It, 78 Mich. L. Rev. 204 (1978).
Langer, Máximo, Rethinking Plea Bargaining: The Practice and Reform of Prosecutorial Adjudication in American Criminal Procedure, 33 Am. J. Crim. L. 223 (2006).
Langhofer, Kory A., Comment, Unaccountable at the Founding: The Originalist Case for Anonymous Juries, 115 Yale L.J. 1823 (2006).
Lanni, Adriaan, The Future of Community Justice, 40 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 359 (2005).
Leipold, Andrew, Why Are Federal Judges So Acquittal Prone? 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 151 (2005).
Lepore, Jill, New York Burning: Liberty, Slavery and Conspiracy in Eighteenth-Century Manhattan (Knopf: 2005).
Liu, Jessie K., Victimhood, 71 Mo. L. Rev. 115 (2006).
Logan, Wayne A., The Shadow Criminal Law of Municipal Governance, 62 Ohio St. L. J. 1409, (2001).
Logan, Wayne A., Through the Past Darkly: A Survey of the Uses and Abuses of Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Trials, 41 Ariz. L. Rev. 143 (1999).
Marder, Nancy S., The Myth of the Nullifying Jury, 93 Nw. U. L. Rev. 877 (1999).
Marder, Nancy S., Beyond Gender: Peremptory Challenges and the Roles of the Jury, 73 Tex. L. Rev. 1041 (1995).
McManus, Edgar J., Law and Liberty in Early New England: Criminal Justice and Due Process, 1620–1692 (1993).
Meares, Tracy L., Rewards for Good Behavior: Influencing Prosecutorial Discretion and Conduct with Financial Incentives, 64 Fordham L. Rev. 851 (1995).
Meares, Tracey L. & Kahan, Dan M., Black, White and Gray: A Reply to Alschuler and Schulhofer, 1998 U. Chi. Legal F. 245 (1998).
Meyer, Linda Ross, The Justice of Mercy (2013).
Minton, Todd D., U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Jail Inmates at Midyear 2011 – Statistical Tables 1 (2011).
Moore, Michael, Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law 91 (1997).
Morris, Herbert, Persons and Punishment, inOn Guilt And Innocence, Essays in Legal Philosophy And Moral Psychology31−58 (1976).
Morris, Norval, The Future of Imprisonment (1974).
Murphy, Jeffrie G. and Jean Hampton, Forgiveness And Mercy (1988).
Myers, Bryan and Green, Edith, The Prejudicial Nature of Victim Impact Statements, 10 Psychol. Pub. Pol’y492 (2004).
Nelson, William, The Common Law in Colonial America: Volume II: The Middle Colonies and the Carolinas, 1660–1730 (2012).
Nelson, William, Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1760–1830 (1994).
Nelson, William E. & Palmer, Robert C., Liberty and Community: Constitution and Rights in the Early American Republic (1987).
New York Charter of Liberties (1663).
O’Hear, Michael, What’s Good About Trials? 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. Pennumbra209 (2007).
Oldenquist, Andrew, An Explanation of Retribution, 85 J. Phil. 464 (1988).
Pole, J. R., Reflections on American Law and the American Revolution, 50 Wm. & Mary Q. 123 (1993).
Pope, Jacqueline, Bounty Hunters, Marshals, and Sheriffs: Forward to the Past (1998).
Posner, Eric A., ed., Social Norms, Nonlegal Sanctions, and the Law (2007).
Pretrial Justice Institute, January–December 2011 Annual Report (2011).
Rapaport, Elizabeth, Retribution and Redemption in the Operation of Executive Clemency, 74 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1501 (2000).
Reitz, Kevin, The New Sentencing Conundrum: Policy and Constitutional Law at Cross-Purposes, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1082 (2005).
Reitz, Kevin, Modeling Discretion in American Sentencing Systems, 20 Law & Pol’y389, 393 (1998).
Resnik, Judith, Managerial Judges, 96 Harv. L. Rev. 374 (1982).
Robbennolt, Jennifer K., Evaluating Juries by Comparison to Judges: A Benchmark for Judging? 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 469 (2005).
Robinson, Paul, Garvey, Stephen & Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, eds., Criminal Law Conversations (2009).
Robinson, Paul H., Competing Conceptions of Modern Desert: Vengeful, Deontological, and Empirical, 67 Cambridge L.J. 145 (2008).
Robinson, Paul H. & Kurzban, Robert, Concordance and Conflict in Intuitions of Justice, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1829, 1846–92 (2007).
Robinson, Paul H. & Spellman, Barbara A., Sentencing Decisions: Matching the Decisionmaker to the Decision Nature, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1124 (2005).
Rosen, Richard A., Disciplinary Sanctions Against Prosecutors for Brady Violations: A Paper Tiger, 65 N.C. L. Rev. 693 (1987).
Ryan, Meghan, Proximate Retribution, 48 Hous. L. Rev. 1049 (2012).
Schauer, Frederick, On the Supposed Jury-Dependence of Evidence Law, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. 165 (2006).
Schragger, Richard C., The Limits of Localism, 100 Mich. L. Rev. 371, 372–73 (2001).
Schulhofer, Stephen, Plea Bargaining as Disaster, 101 Yale L.J. 1979 (1992).
Scott-Hayward, Christine S., Shadow Sentencing: The Imposition of Federal Supervised Release, 18 Berkeley J. of Crim. L. 181 (2013).
Simon, Jonathan, Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear (2007).
Slobogin, Christopher, A Jurisprudence of Dangerousness, 98 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1, 2 (2003).
Smith, Stephen, Localism and Capital Punishment, 64 Vanderbilt L. Rev. En Banc105 (2011).
Stephen, James Fitzjames, 2 A History Of The Criminal Law Of England (1883).
Stimson, Shannon C., The American Revolution in the Law: Anglo-American Jurisprudence before John Marshall 59–61 (1990).
Stith, Kate & Cabranes, Jose, Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts (1998).
Stuntz, William J., The Collapse of American Criminal Justice (2011).
Stuntz, William J., Unequal Justice, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1969, 1974 (2008).
Stuntz, William J., Plea Bargaining and Criminal Law’s Disappearing Shadow, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2548 (2004).
Sullivan, Dennis & Tifft, Larry, eds., Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective (2006).
Sunstein, Cass R., Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes, 110 Yale L.J. 71 (2000).
Swire, Peter P., Elephants and Mice Revisited: Law and Choice of Law on the Internet, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1975 (2005).
Tetlow, Tania, Discriminatory Acquittal, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rights Q. 75 (2009).
Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America (Francis Bowen, trans., Knopf, Alfred A., 4th prtg. 1948) (1835).
Tonry, Michael, ed., The Future of Imprisonment (2004).
Tonry, Michael, Rethinking Unthinkable Punishment Practices in America, 46 UCLA L. Rev. 1451 (1999).
Toobin, Jeffrey, This Is My Jail, The New Yorker 26 (April 14, 2014).
Tulchin, Matthew T., An Analysis of the Development of the Jury’s Role in a New York Criminal Trial, 13 J.L. & Pol’y425 (2005).
Turner, Jenia, Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice, 89 Va. L. Rev. 311 (2003).
U.S. Cont’l Cong., Journal of the Proceedings of the Congress, Held at Philadelphia, September 5, 1774 (Philadelphia, William and Thomas Bradford 1774).
von Hirsch, Andrew, Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishment (1976).
Washburn, Kevin, Restoring the Grand Jury, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2333 (2008).
Weisberg, Robert, Excerpts from “The Future of American Sentencing: A National Roundtable on Blakely,” 2 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 619 (2005).
Wells, Philip A., Shrinking the Internet, 5 NYU J. L. & Liberty531 (2010).
Wiseman, Samuel, Pretrial Detention and the Right to Be Monitored, 138 Yale L.J. 1118 (2014).
Wistrich, Andrew J., Guthrie, Chris & Rachlinski, Jeffrey J., Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1251 (2005).
Worrall, James L., Prosecution in America: A Historical and Comparative Account (2008).
Wright, Ron, Trial Distortion and the End of Innocence in Federal Criminal Justice, 154 U. Penn. L. Rev. 79 (2005).
Wright, Ron & Miller, Marc, The Screening/Bargaining Tradeoff, 55 Stan. L. Rev. 29, 30 (2002).
Yellen, David, Probation Officers Look at Plea Bargaining, and Do Not Like What They See, 8 Fed. Sent’g Rep. 339 (1996).
Zimring, Franklin E. & Hawkins, Gordon, Dangerousness and Criminal Justice, 85 Mich. L. Rev. 481 (1986).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.