Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 36
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9781107775565

Book description

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) articulates what has now become a global norm. CEDAW establishes the moral, civic, and political equality of women; women's right to be free from discrimination and violence; and the responsibility of governments to take positive action to achieve these goals. The United States is not among the 187 countries that have ratified the treaty. To explain why the United States has not ratified CEDAW, this book highlights the emergence of the treaty in the context of the Cold War, the deeply partisan nature of women's rights issues in the United States, and basic disagreements about how human rights treaties work.

Awards

Winner, 2015 Victoria Schuck Award, American Political Science Association

Winner, 2015 Best Book Award, Human Rights Section, American Political Science Association

Reviews

'Breaking with the conventions in political science that create stark distinctions between the study of domestic politics within nation-states and the study of international relations, Lisa Baldez takes a novel approach to the Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Steeped in the literatures on international organizations, international law, US politics, and women and politics, Baldez demonstrates how the use of gender as an analytical category complicates what is thought to be known about the creation and ratification of international conventions, the status of women in the world over the past half century, and the central cleavages in national politics in both the United States and Chile. This book is thoroughly researched and clearly written, and it covers ground that has not been addressed previously. Baldez’s approach is both thought-provoking and provocative.'

Mary Hawkesworth - Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

'This is a lively and important book on an understudied topic, which makes valuable theoretical insights in international relations while providing rich data on CEDAW as a case study of a human rights treaty. Using the puzzling case of US non-ratification of CEDAW, Lisa Baldez convincingly argues that by all rights, the United States should have ratified CEDAW, given that the costs of doing so would be low and the norms embodied in the treaty are rhetorically consistent with US political values. Using fascinating primary sources, Baldez’s analysis of the domestic and international obstacles to ratification brings the insights of comparative politics and international relations together in an original way.'

Valerie Sperling - Clark University

'… Baldez offers a detailed historical account of the multi-faceted arguments regarding CEDAW’s ratification, and sheds much needed light on the extent to which women’s rights engage competing interests and conflicting agendas domestically and internationally. Finally, by tracing the sources of deep-seated opposition to CEDAW, and illustrating that the United States’ failure to ratify results in compromised human rights protections for American women, Baldez illustrates just how necessary CEDAW is as a convention to enshrine women’s rights as global norms.'

Wendy O’Brien Source: Academic Council on the United Nations System (www.acuns.org)

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Works Cited
Achmad, Sjamsiah. 2007. “A Source of Inspiration.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 333–335.
Afsharipour, Afra. 1999. “Empowering Ourselves: The Role of Women’s NGOs in the Enforcement of the Women’s Convention.” Columbia Law Review 99 CrossRef | Google Scholar (1): 129–172.
Anderson, Carol. 2003. Eyes Off the Prize: The United Nations and the African American Struggle for Human Rights, 1944–1955. Cambridge, UK; New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Carol 2009. “A “Hollow Mockery”: African Americans, White Supremacy, and the Development of Human Rights in the United States.” In Bringing Human Rights Home, eds. Soohoo, Cynthia, Albisa, Catherine, and Davis, Martha F.. Philadelphia Google Scholar: University of Pennsylvania Press. 68–99.
ANNA National Centre for the Prevention of Violence. 2010 Google Scholar. “Violence against Women in the Russian Federation.” Retrieved from .
Aouij, Emna. 2007. “Personal Reflections: In the Muslim World.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: Feminist Press. 86–87.
Athanasakos, Betty. 2011 Google Scholar. Telephone interview with the author. May 25.
Avdeyeva, Olga. 2007. “When Do States Comply with International Treaties? Policies on Violence against Women in Post-Communist Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 51 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 877–900.
Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women’s Movements in Chile. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Baldez, Lisa, Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2006. “Does the U.S. Constitution Need an Equal Rights Amendment?Journal of Legal Studies 35 Google Scholar: 243.
Bedi, Sonu. 2012 Google Scholar. “Higher Lawmaking and the Horizontal Effect of Rights: Religious Employers and the Right to Non-Discrimination.” Presented at Dartmouth College, Department of Government, Hanover, NH.
Bernard, Désirée Patricia. 2007. “The First Twelve Years.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 266–267.
Bettinger-Lopez, Caroline. 2008. “Jessica Gonzales v. United States: An Emerging Model for Domestic Violence & Human Rights Advocacy in the United States.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 21 Google Scholar: 183–195.
Bradley, Curtis A. 2010. “The United States and Human Rights Treaties: Race Relations, the Cold War, and Constitutionalism.” Chinese Journal of International Law 9 CrossRef | Google Scholar(2): 321–344.
Brewer, Lindsay. 2013 Google Scholar. “CEDAW Ratification: Lessons from CERD.” Unpublished paper, Dartmouth College.
Byrnes, Andrew C. 2010 Google Scholar. “The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Reflections on Their Role in the Development of International Human Rights Law and as a Catalyst for National Legislative and Policy Reform.” UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2010–2017.
Byrnes, Andrew, and Freeman, Marsha. 2012 Google Scholar. “The Impact of the CEDAW Convention: Paths to Equality,” University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series. Retrieved from (accessed July 25, 2013).
C-SPAN. May 11, 2000 Google Scholar. “Senate Footage: Senator Jesse Helms.” Retrieved from (accessed July 25, 2013).
Cartwright, Silvia. 1997. “Rights and Remedies: The Drafting of an Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.” Otago Law Review 9 Google Scholar (2): 239–254.
Cartwright, Silvia Rose. 2007. “Personal Reflection: Interpreting the Convention.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: Feminist Press. 30–35.
Center for Health and Gender Equity. 2014 Google Scholar. “Helms Amendment.” (accessed March 2, 2014).
Centro Tepeyac. n.d. “About Us and Our Services.” (accessed February 11, 2014). Google Scholar
Chavkin, Wendy, and Chesler, Ellen, eds. 2005. Where Human Rights Begin: Health, Sexuality, and Women in the New Millennium. New Brunswick, NJ Google Scholar: Rutgers University Press.
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1993. “On Compliance.” International Organization 47 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 175–205.
Cho, Seo-Young. 2010 Google Scholar. “International Human Rights Treaty to Change Social Patterns: The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women,” CEGE (Centre for European Governance and Economic Development Research) Discussion Paper No. 93. Retrieved from (accessed February 11, 2012).
Clark, Belinda. 1991. “The Vienna Convention Reservations Regime and the Convention on Discrimination Against Women.” American Journal of International Law 85 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 281–321.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. 2000 Google Scholar. “Third Periodic Report: Belarus.” Retrieved from (accessed February 11, 2012).
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2009 Google Scholar. “List of Issues and Questions with Regard to the Consideration of Periodic Reports: Russian Federation.” Retrieved from (accessed October 8, 2013).
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2010 Google Scholara. “Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Russian Federation.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2010 Google Scholarb. “Provisional Agenda, 46th Session (12–30 July) New York.” Retrieved from (accessed October 8, 2013).
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2010 Google Scholarc. “Responses to the List of Issues and Questions with Regard to the Consideration of the Combined Sixth and Seventh Periodic Report: Russian Federation.” Retrieved from (accessed October 8, 2013).
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2010 Google Scholard. “Summary Record of the 930th Meeting, Forty-Sixth Session.” Retrieved from .
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women 2013 Google Scholar. “Follow Up Procedure.” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
Concerned Women for America. 2010 Google Scholar. “Save Mothers’ Day: A Campaign to Educate America about the Dangers of CEDAW.” Retrieved from (accessed August 25, 2011).
Concerned Women for America 2013 Google Scholar. “Concerned Women for America.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
Connelly, Matthew. 2008. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Connors, Jane. 2007. “On Twenty Years of Involvement.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 282–285.
Consortium of Women’s Non-Governmental Associations. 2010 Google Scholar. “Implementation by the Russian Federation of UN Convention on Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W., Jr. 1996. “How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 40 CrossRef | Google Scholar (4): 451–478.
Corti, Ivanka. 2007. “Relationships with UN Conferences, Specialized Agencies, Programs and Funds.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: Feminist Press. 36–51.
Costain, Anne N. 1992. Inviting Women’s Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women’s Movement. Baltimore Google Scholar: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dairam, Shanti. 2007. “From Global to Local: The Involvement of NGOs.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 313–325.
Dairam, Shanti 2011 Google Scholar. Interview with the author. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April 29.
Dairam, Shanti 2012 Google Scholar. “International Norms and the Realization of Women’s Human Rights: The Role of Civil Society Organizations.” Presented at the 30th Anniversary of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, New York.
den Boer, Andrea. 2008 Google Scholar. “Evaluating CEDAW’s Impact on Women’s Empowerment.” Presented at the International Studies Association 49th Annual Convention, San Francisco, CA.
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?International Organization 50 Google Scholar (3): 379–406.
DuBois, Ellen, and Derby, Lauren. 2009. “The Strange Case of Minerva Bernardino: Pan American and United Nations Women’s Right Activist.” Women’s Studies International Forum 32 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 43–50.
East, Catherine. 1983. “Newer Commissions.” In Women in Washington, ed. Tinker, Irene. Beverly Hills, CA Google Scholar: SAGE. 35–44.
Roosevelt, Eleanor et al. February 12, 1946 Google Scholar. “An Open Letter to the World.” Retrieved from (accessed July 18, 2013).
Englehart, Neil A., and Miller, Melissa K.. 2012 Google Scholar. “The CEDAW Effect: Women’s Rights, International Law and Domestic Politics.” Unpublished paper, Bowling Green State University.
Evatt, Elizabeth. 2007. “Private Global Enterprise, International Trade, and Finance.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 106–121.
Facio, Alda, and Morgan, Martha I.. 2009. “Equity or Equality for Women? Understanding CEDAW’s Equality Principles.” IWRAW Asia Pacific Occasional Papers Series No. 14 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 1–38.
Farrior, Stephanie. 1997. “The International Law on Trafficking in Women and Children for Prostitution: Making It Live Up to Its Potential.” Harvard Human Rights Journal Google Scholar (10): 213–255.
FDCH Political Transcripts. November 3, 1999 Google Scholar. “U.S. Representative Lynn Woolsey (D-CA) Holds News Conference on Senator Helm’s Hold on the CEDAW.” Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
Flinterman, Cees. 2007. “Strengthening Women’s Human Rights Through Individual Complaints.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 286–297.
Fraser, Arvonne. 2007. She’s No Lady: Politics, Family and International Feminism. Minneapolis, MN Google Scholar: Nodin Press.
Fraser, Arvonne S. 1995. “The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (The Women’s Convention).” In Women, Politics and the United Nations, ed. Winslow, Anne. Westport, CT Google Scholar: Greenwood Press. 77–94.
Fraser, Arvonne S., and Tinker, Irene, eds. 2004. Developing Power: How Women Transformed International Development. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press.
Freeman, Jo. 2000. The Politics of the Women’s Liberation Movement. Lincoln, NE Google Scholar: iUniverse.com.
Freeman, Marsha. 2008 Google Scholar. Interview with the author. Minneapolis, MN, March 4.
Freeman, Marsha A. 2008. “Women’s Human Rights in the 21st Century: Crisis, Challenge, and Opportunity.” In Human Rights in Crisis, ed. Bullard, Alice. Burlington, VT Google Scholar: Ashgate Publishing Company. 67–86.
Friedman, Elisabeth J. 2009. “Re(gion)alizing Women’s Human Rights in Latin America.” Politics & Gender 5 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 349–375.
Front Line & International Commission of Jurists. 2010 Google Scholar. “Consideration of the 6th and 7th Periodic Reports of the Russian Federation.” Retrieved from (accessed October 8, 2013).
Galey, Margaret E. 1979. “Promoting Nondiscrimination against Women: The UN Commission on the Status of Women.” International Studies Quarterly 23 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 273–302.
Galey, Margaret E. 1984. “International Enforcement of Women’s Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 6 CrossRef | Google Scholar (4): 463–490.
Galey, Margaret E. 1998. “The Significance of the UN World Women’s Conferences.” In To Beijing and Beyond: Pittsburgh and the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women, ed. Auth, Janice. Pittsburgh, PA Google Scholar: University of Pittsburgh Press. 11–32.
Garner, Kimberly. 2010. Shaping a Global Women’s Agenda: Women’s NGOs and Global Governance, 1925–85. Manchester, UK Google Scholar: Manchester University Press.
Ghodsee, Kristen. 2010. “Revisiting the United Nations Decade for Women: Brief Reflections on Feminism, Capitalism and Cold War Politics in the Early Years of the International Women’s Movement.” Women’s Studies International Forum 33 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 3–12.
Gildersleeve, Virginia Crocheron. 1954. Many A Good Crusade. New York Google Scholar: The Macmillan Company.
Global Justice Center. “CEDAW Case Bank.” Retrieved from (accessed September 18, 2011 Google Scholar).
Goodliffe, Jay, and Hawkins, Darren G.. 2006. “Explaining Commitment: States and the Convention Against Torture.” Journal of Politics 68 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 358–371.
Goonesekere, Savitri. 2007. “Universalizing Women’s Human Rights Through CEDAW.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hannah Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 52–67.
Gray, Mark M., Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2006. “Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000.” International Organization 60 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 293–333.
Gregg, Robert W. 1993. About Face? The United States and the United Nations. Boulder and London Google Scholar: Lynne Rienner.
Group of 77. 1967 Google Scholar. “Charter of Algiers.” Retrieved from (accessed February 10, 2012).
Gubbins, Joan, et al. 1978 Google Scholar. “To Establish Justice…’: Minority Report.” In The Spirit of Houston: The First National Women’s Conference, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. In Kathryn Kish Shklar and Thomas Dublin, Women and Social Movements in the United States, 1600–2000. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology 110 CrossRef | Google Scholar (5): 1373–1411.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2003. “The Cost of Commitment.” Stanford Law Review 55 CrossRef | Google Scholar (5): 1821–1862.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2007. “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 Google Scholar (4): 588–621.
Hathaway, Oona A. 2008. “Treaties’ End: The Past, Present, and Future of International Lawmaking in the United States.” The Yale Law Journal 117 CrossRef | Google Scholar (7): 1236–1372.
Hayes, Ceri. 2011. CEDAW: The 30-Year Struggle for Equality. London Google Scholar: WOMANKIND Worldwide.
Henkin, Louis. 1995. “U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker.” American Journal of International Law 89 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 341–350.
Heyns, Christof H., and Viljoen, Frans. 2002. The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level. The Hague, London, New York Google Scholar: Kluwer Law International.
Hoff Somers, Christina. 2011. “Feminism by Treaty,” Policy Review Google Scholar (167). Retrieved from (accessed April 9, 2012).
Humphrey, John P. 1984. Human Rights & the United Nations: A Great Adventure. Dobbs Ferry, NY Google Scholar: Transnational Publishers, Inc.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
IWRAW-Asia Pacific. 2013 Google Scholar. “IWRAW-Asia Pacific.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
Jackson, Richard L. 1983. The Non-Aligned, the UN, and the Superpowers. New York Google Scholar: Praeger.
Jacobson, Roberta. 1992. “The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.” In The United Nations and Human Rights, ed. Alston, Philip. Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon Press. 444–472.
Javate de Dios, Aurora. 2007. “Personal Reflection: The Circle of Empowerment.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 309–312.
Joachim, Jutta. 2003. “Framing Issues and Seizing Opportunities: The UN, NGOs, and Women’s Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 47 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 247–274.
Josiah, Ivy. 2011 Google Scholar. Interview with the author. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April 25.
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY Google Scholar: Cornell University Press.
Kenyon, Dorothy. September 12, 1945 Google Scholar. “The Response of the United States to the Brazilian Declaration Recommending the Establishment of a Commission of Women in the United Nations Organization, from Report to the President on the Results of the San Francisco Conference: Charter Hearings Revised.” Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
Kenyon, Dorothy September 19, 1945 Google Scholar. “Report of Conference on the United Nations and the Special Interests of Women.” Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
Kenyon, Dorothy March 29, 1946 Google Scholar. “Report on Conference between Representatives of National Women’s Organizations and Members of Staff of Department of State.” Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
Kenyon, Dorothy November 27, 1946 Google Scholar. “Memorandum of Conversation.” Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1997. “Why Do Nations Obey International Law?The Yale Law Journal 106 Google Scholar (8): 2599–2659.
Lauren, P. G. 1998. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. Philadelphia Google Scholar: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Laville, Helen. 2008. “A New Era in International Women’s Rights? American Women’s Associations and the Establishment of the UN Commission on the Status of Women.” Journal of Women’s History 20 CrossRef | Google Scholar (4): 34–56.
LeBlanc, Lawrence J. 1991. The United States and the Genocide Convention. Durham and London Google Scholar: Duke University Press.
Manalo, Rosario G. 2007. “The Female Face of Migration.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 183–195.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago Google Scholar: University of Chicago Press.
McPhedran, Marilou, Bazilli, Susan, Erickson, Moana, and Byrnes, Andrew. 2000. The First CEDAW Impact Study: Final Report. Toronto, Ontario Google Scholar: Centre for Feminist Research, York University and the International Women’s Right Project.
Melander, Göran. 2007. “Important Changes and Further Reforms Needed.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 346.
Melich, Tanya. 1998. The Republican War against Women: An Insider’s Reports from Behind the Lines. New York Google Scholar: Bantam.
Melish, Tara J. 2009. “From Paradox to Subsidiarity: The United States and Human Rights Treaty Bodies.” Yale Journal of International Law 34 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 389–462.
Milani, Leila Rassekh, Albert, Sarah C., and Purushotma, Karina. 2004. CEDAW: The Treaty for the Rights of Women Google Scholar. Washington, DC: Working Group on Ratification of the UN.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 217–252.
Morvai, Krisztina. 2007. “Personal Reflection: Rethinking Prostitution and Trafficking.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 141–144.
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick, and Weaver, Suzanne. 1978. A Dangerous Place. Boston Google Scholar: Little, Brown and Company.
Musawah, . 2011. CEDAW and Muslim Family Laws: In Search of Common Ground. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia Google Scholar: Sisters in Islam.
National Commission on the Observance of International Women’s Year. 1978a. “Biographies of National Commissioners.” In The Spirit of Houston: The First National Women’s Conference. Washington, DC Google Scholar: Government Printing Office. In Kathryn Kish Shklar and Thomas Dublin, Women and Social Movements in the United States, 1600–2000. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
National Commission on the Observance of International Women’s Year 1978b. “The Torch Relay.” In The Spirit of Houston: The First National Women’s Conference, Washington, DC Google Scholar: U.S. Government Printing Office. In Kathryn Kish Sklar and Thomas Dublin, Women and Social Movements in the United States, 1600–2000. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
National Organization for Women. 2012 Google Scholar. “Removing the Time Limit from the Equal Rights Amendment.” Retrieved from (accessed October 8, 2013).
Non-Aligned Movement. 2001 Google Scholar. “The Non-Aligned Movement: Description and History.” Retrieved from (accessed August 18, 2011).
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. “India: Implementing Sex Equality Through Law.” Chicago Journal of International Law 2 Google Scholar: 35–58.
Office of the Special Adviser on Gender. 2000 Google Scholar. “Landmark resolution on Women, Peace and Security.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2012 Google Scholar. “Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women – Forty-ninth session (11–29 July 2011) – Fiftieth session (3–21 October 2011) – Fifty-first session (13 February–2 March 2012).” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 2013 Google Scholara. “Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women – General recommendations.” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights 2013 Google Scholarb. “Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 55th session (8–26 July 2013).” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights n.d.a. “The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System: An Introduction to the Core Human Rights Treaties and the Treaty Bodies, Fact Sheet No. 30.” Retrieved from (accessed March 2, 2014). Google Scholar
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights n.d.b. “The Core International Human Rights Instruments and their monitoring bodies.” Retrieved from (accessed July 31, 2013). Google Scholar
Olcott, Jocelyn 2010. “Globalizing Sisterhood: International Women’s Year and the Politics of Representation.” In The Shock of the Global: The 1970s in Perspective, ed. Maier, Charles S., Ferguson, Niall, Manela, Erez, and Sargent, Daniel J.. Cambridge, MA Google Scholar: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 281–293.
Organization of American States Google Scholar. n.d. “American Convention on Human Rights.” Retrieved from (accessed August 5, 2013).
Ostrower, Gary B. 1998. The United Nations and the United States. New York Google Scholar: Twayne Publishers.
Otto, Diane. 2002. “‘Gender Comment’: Why Does the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Need a General Comment on Women?Canadian Journal of Women and Law 14 Google Scholar: 1–52.
Parry, John T. 2008. “Torture Nation, Torture Law.” Georgetown Law Journal 97 Google Scholar: 1001–1056.
Powell, Catherine. 2002. “Comment: United States Human Rights Policy in the 21st Century in an Age of Multilateralism.” St. Louis University Law Journal 46 Google Scholar: 421–430.
Power, Samantha. 2002. A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York Google Scholar: Perennial.
Ramaseshan, Geeta. 2007. Addressing Rape as a Human Rights Violation: The Role of International Human Rights Norms and Instruments. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Google Scholar: International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW-AP).
Rambo, Kirsten S. 2008 Google Scholar. “Trivial Complaints: The Role of Privacy in Domestic Violence Law and Activism.” Retrieved from (accessed July 9, 2013).
Rawalt, Marguerite. 1983. “The Equal Rights Amendment.” In Women in Washington, ed. Tinker, Irene. Beverly Hills, CA Google Scholar: SAGE. 49–78.
Reanda, Laura. 1992. “The Commission on the Status of Women.” In The United Nations and Human Rights, ed. Alston, Philip. Oxford Google Scholar: Clarendon Press. 265–303.
Risse, Thomas, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1999. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction.” In The Power of Human Rights, eds. Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press. 1–39.
Robb, Janet. October 20, 1951. “The Work of the Commission on the Status of Women.” Dorothy Kenyon Papers. Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA Google Scholar.
Robins, Dorothy B. 1971. Experiment in Democracy: The Story of U.S. Citizen Organizations in Forging the Charter of the United Nations. New York Google Scholar: The Parkside Press.
Rudolf, Beate, Freeman, Marsha A., and Chinkin, C. M.. 2012. The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: A CommentaryOxford; New York Google Scholar: Oxford University Press.
Russian LGBT Network. 2010 Google Scholar. “Shadow Report: Discrimination and Violence against Lesbian and Bisexual Women and Transgender People in Russia.” Retrieved from (accessed October 9, 2013).
Rymph, Catherine E. 2006. Republican Women: Feminism and Conservatism from Suffrage Through the Rise of the New Right. Chapel Hill Google Scholar: University of North Carolina Press.
Schlafly, Phyllis. 2012 Google Scholar. Skype Conversation. Hanover, NH, May 15.
Schneider, Elizabeth M. 2008. “Domestic Violence Law Reform in the Twenty-First Century: Looking Back and Looking Forward.” Family Law Quarterly 42 Google Scholar (8): 353–363.
Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate. 2007. “The Nature and Mandate of the Committee.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 248–261.
Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate, and Flinterman, Cees, eds. 2007. The Circle of Empowerment: Twenty-Five Years of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press.
Schwelb, Egon. 1966. “The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 15 CrossRef | Google Scholar (4): 996–1068.
Scoop News. July 13, 2012 Google Scholar. “Minister to present gender equality report to UN.” Retrieved from .
Shahani, Leticia Ramos. 2004. “The UN, Women, and Development: The World Conferences on Women.” In Developing Power, eds. Fraser, Arvonne and Tinker, Irene. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 26–36.
Shalev, Carmel. 2007. “Women’s Health: Accommodating Difference.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 196–211.
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. “Women and International Institutions: The Effects of the Women’s Convention on Female Education.” In Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, eds. Milner, Helen and Moravcsik, Andrew. Princeton Google Scholar: Princeton University Press. 108–125.
Simmons, Beth A 2010. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York Google Scholar: Cambridge University Press.
Skard, Torild. 2008. “Getting Our History Right: How Were the Equal Rights of Women and Men Included in the Charter of the United Nations?Forum for Development Studies 1 Google Scholar: 37–60.
Snider, Christy Jo. 2007. “Planning for Peace: Virginia Gildersleeve at the United Nations Conference on International Organizations and Institutions.” Peace & Change 32 CrossRef | Google Scholar (2): 168–185.
Spruill, Marjorie. 2008 Google Scholar. “The Conservative Challenge to Feminist Influence on State Commissions on the Status of Women.” In Kathryn Kish Sklar and Thomas Dublin, Women and Social Movements of the United States, 1600–2000. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
Stephenson, Carolyn M. 1982. “Feminism, Pacifism, Nationalism and the United Nations Decade for Women.” Women’s Studies International Forum 5 Google Scholar (3/4): 287–300.
Tallaway, Mervat. 2007. “Dual Perspectives.” In The Circle of Empowerment, eds. Schöpp-Schilling, Hanna Beate and Flinterman, Cees. New York Google Scholar: The Feminist Press. 272–273.
Hui, Tan Beng. 2007 Google Scholar. Exploring the Potential of the UN Treaty Body System in Addressing Sexuality Rights. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific (IWRAW-AP).
The Foundry. September 23, 2013 Google Scholar. “The Latest Priorities of the U.N. Treaty Enforcers.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
Thorstad, Katherine M. 2013 Google Scholar. “To What Extent Does the Fourteenth Amendment Guarantee Equality on the Basis of Gender?” Unpublished paper. Dartmouth College.
Tripon, Olivia H., ed. 2007. Shaping the Global Women’s Agenda: Filipino Women in the United Nations. Manila Google Scholar: National Commission on the Role of Filipino Women.
UN Commission on the Status of Women. 1964 Google Scholar. “Draft Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.” October 30 (E/CN.6/426). Accessed through Harvard College Library.
UN Commission on the Status of Women 1965 Google Scholar. “Summary Records of the 18th Session”. Accessed through Harvard College Library.
UN Commission on the Status of Women 1974 Google Scholar. “Summary Records of the 25th Session, January14–22”. Accessed through Harvard College Library.
UN Commission on the Status of Women 1976 Google Scholar. “International Instruments Relating to the Status of Women: Draft Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women” (E/CN.6/591). Accessed through Harvard College Library.
UN General Assembly. 1946 Google Scholar. “Political Rights of Women A/RES/56(I).” Retrieved from (accessed July 18, 2013).
UN General Assembly 1962 Google Scholar. “United Nations Assistance for the Advancement of Women in Developing Countries (A/RES/1777(XVII)).” Retrieved from (accessed July 18, 2013).
UN General Assembly 1967 Google Scholar. “Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (A/RES/2263(XXII)).” Retrieved from (accessed October 4, 2013).
UN General Assembly 1979 Google Scholar. Report of the Working Group of the Whole on the Drafting of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (A/C.3/34/14).
UN General Assembly 1997 Google Scholar. “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, A/RES/51/68.” Retrieved from (accessed October 8, 2013).
UN General Assembly 1998 Google Scholar. “Follow-Up to the World Conference on Human Rights, A/53/372”. Retrieved from .
UN Third Committee of the General Assembly. 1979 Google Scholar. “Records of Meetings Nos. 70 and 71 Held on 6 and 7 of December 1979.” Retrieved from (accessed June 28, 2013).
UN Women. 1995 Google Scholar. “Platform for Action.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
UN Women 2000 Google Scholar. “Reservations to CEDAW.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
UN Women 2011 Google Scholar. “The World Conferences on Women.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
UN Women 2013 Google Scholara. “About UN Women.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
UN Women 2013 Google Scholarb. “General Recommendations.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
United Nations. 1945 Google Scholar. “Charter of the United Nations.” Retrieved from (accessed August 5, 2011).
United Nations October 30, 1964 Google Scholar. “Draft Declaration on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Memorandum by the Secretary General (E/CN.6/426)”.
United Nations 1984 Google Scholar. “Contributions of the [CEDAW] Committee to International Conferences; Report of the Committee on Progress Achieved in the Implementation of the Convention”.
United Nations 1986 Google Scholar. “Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (fifth session)”. Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
United Nations 1993 Google Scholar. “Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women, A/RES/48/104.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
United Nations 1996. The United Nations and the Advancement of Women 1945–1996. New York Google Scholar: United Nations.
United Nations 2007 Google Scholar. “Short History of the Commission on the Status of Women.” Division for the Advancement of Women. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Retrieved from (accessed August 12, 2011).
United Nations 2013 Google Scholara. “UN System Organizational Chart.” Retrieved from (accessed June 25, 2013).
United Nations 2013 Google Scholarb. “United Nations Treaty Collection.” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
United Nations 2013 Google Scholarc. “United Nations Treaty Collection.” Retrieved from (accessed October 1, 2013).
United Nations Google Scholar n.d. “Short History of the Commission on the Status of Women.” Retrieved from (accessed August 12, 2011).
United States. 1973 Google Scholara. “Telegram 4973 From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, November 21, 1973, 1600Z.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1973 Google Scholarb. “Telegram 250151 From the Department of State to All Diplomatic Posts, December 26, 1973, 2137.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1974 Google Scholara. “Abstract of a Research Study Prepared in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Washington, January 15, 1974.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1974 Google Scholarb. “Memorandum from the Executive Secretary of the Department of State (Springsteen) to the President’s Counselor in the White House Office for Women’s Programs (Armstrong), Washington, May 14, 1974.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1974 Google Scholarc. “Telegram 383 From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, February 4, 1974, 1954Z.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1974 Google Scholard. “Telegram 104050 From the Department of State to All Diplomatic Posts, May 17, 1974, 2304Z.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1974 Google Scholare. “Telegram 184584 From the Department of State to All Diplomatic Posts, August 22, 1974, 2013Z.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1975 Google Scholara. “Action Memorandum From the Assistant Secretary of State for Management (Eagleburger) and the Director of the Policy Planning Staff (Lord) to Secretary of State Kissinger, Washington, September 24, 1975.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1975 Google Scholarb. “Intelligence Memorandum Prepared in the Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, February 11, 1975.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1975 Google Scholarc. “Letter From the Director of the United States Center for the International Women’s Year (Bacon) to Secretary of State Kissinger, Washington, July 24, 1975.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1975 Google Scholard. “Memorandum of Conversation, White House, Washington, September 26, 1975, 11:30 a.m.–noon.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1975 Google Scholare. “Telegram 883 From the Mission to the United Nations to the Department of State, March 19, 1975, 1354Z.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1975 Google Scholarf. “Telegram 303856 From the Department of State to All Diplomatic Posts, December 29, 1975, 2324Z.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1976 Google Scholara. “December 17 Cable: Draft Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women; Approval of Article 21 Concerning Procedures for Implementation of the Convention.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1976 Google Scholarb. “December 20 Cable: 26th Resumed Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women; Roundup.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. 1976 Google Scholarc. “Diplomatic Cable, September 17: Twenty-Sixth Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women, September 13-October 1.” Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
United States. [1976 Google Scholar]. Department of State Background Paper: The Interrelationships of Population Matters to the Status of Women and to the Involvement of Women in Socio-Economic Development. Retrieved from (accessed July 12, 2011).
University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. 1994 Google Scholar. “U.S. Reservations, Declarations, and Understandings, International Convention on the Elmination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.” Retrieved from (accessed September 22, 2013).
University of Minnesota Human Rights Library 2008 Google Scholar. “Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties, by country.” Retrieved from (accessed July 31, 2013).
U.S. Department of State. 1976 Google Scholar. “Report of IWY Secretariat on International Women’s Year.” Retrieved from (accessed July 11, 2011).
U.S. Department of State 1980 Google Scholar. “Report of the United States Delegation to the World Conference of the United Nations Decade for Women: Equality, Development and Peace.” Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. House of Representatives. 1983. Hearing on H.J. Res. 1, July 13, September 14, October 20, 26, and November 3, 1983 Google Scholar. Equal Rights Amendment. 98th Cong., 1st session. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. House of Representatives 1984 Google Scholar. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. U.S. Contribution to the UN Decade for Women. September 18. 98th Cong., 1st session. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. House of Representatives 1986 Google Scholar. Report of Congressional Staff Advisors to the Nairobi Conference to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. U.N. Conference to Review and Appraise the U.N. Decade for Women. January. 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. House of Representatives 1995 Google Scholar. Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights of the Committee on International Relations. United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. July 18 and August 2. 104th Cong., 1st sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate Google Scholar. n.d. “Treaties.” Retrieved from (accessed July 26, 2013).
U.S. Senate Google Scholar n.d. “Majority and Minority Leaders and Party Whips.” Retrieved from (accessed July 31, 2013).
U.S. Senate 1980 Google Scholar. “Treaty Doc. 96-53: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.” Retrieved from (accessed March 2, 2014).
U.S. Senate 1984 Google Scholar. Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations. Women in Development: Looking to the Future. June 7. 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 1988 Google Scholar. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and International Operations. Issues Relating to the United Nations Convention to End All Forms of Discrimination against Women. December 5. 100th Cong. 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 1990 Google Scholar. Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. August 2. 101st Cong., 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 1991 Google Scholar. Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. November 21. 102nd Cong., 1st sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 1994 Google Scholara. Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. May 11. 103rd Cong., 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 1994 Google Scholarb. Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. September 27. 103rd Cong., 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 2002 Google Scholar. Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations. Convention to End All Forms of Discrimination against Women: Report Together with Minority and Additional Views. June 13. 107th Cong., 2nd sess. Accessed through Dartmouth College Library.
U.S. Senate 2010 Google Scholar. Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations. Women’s Rights are Human Rights: U.S. Ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Retrieved from (accessed August 23, 2011).
U.S. Senate 2011 Google Scholar. Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Human Rights, Democracy and Global Women’s Issues; Committee on Foreign Relations. Senate; Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs; Committee on Foreign Relations. Women and the Arab Spring. November 2. Retrieved from (accessed March 2, 2014).
Vogelsgang, Sandra. 1978. “What Price Principle? U.S. Policy on Human Rights.” Foreign Affairs 56 CrossRef | Google Scholar (4): 819–841.
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2008. “Political Institutions and Human Rights: Why Dictatorships Enter into the United Nations Convention Against Torture.” International Organization 62 Google Scholar (Winter): 65–101.
Winslow, Anne, ed. 1995. Women, Politics and the United Nations. Westport, CT Google Scholar: Greenwood Press.
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ Google Scholar: Princeton University Press.
Women’s Candidacy Initiative. 2009 Google Scholar. “How Can CEDAW Help Us End Discrimination?” Retrieved from (accessed August 10, 2011).
Wright, Wendy. 2002 Google Scholar. “CEDAW Committee Rulings.” Retrieved from (accessed August 24, 2011).
YouTube. 1995 Google Scholar. “First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Remarks to the Fourth Women’s Conference in Beijing, China.” Retrieved from (accessed September 8, 2013).
YouTube 2010 Google Scholar. “President Obama Supports CEDAW.” Retrieved from (accessed September 22, 2013).
Zinsser, Judith P. 2002. “From Mexico to Copenhagen to Nairobi: The United Nations Decade for Women, 1975–1985.” Journal of World History 13 CrossRef | Google Scholar: 139–67.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1776 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 8524 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th April 2025. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.