‘Advice to Aspiring Artists.’ Punch, or the London Charivari IX (1845): 103.Google Scholar

Allen, Brian. Ed. Towards a Modern Art World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Amigoni, David. ‘Translating the Self: Sexuality, Religion, and Sanctuary in John Addington Symonds’s Cellini and Other Acts of Life Writing.’ Biography 32.1 (2009): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amigoni, David, and Regis, Amber K.. ‘The Colony, the Carpenter’s Shop, and the Making of the Queer “Man of Letters”: Hybridity, Art, and Sexuality in J. A. Symonds’s Writing.’ Études Anglaises 61.3 (2008): 300–310.Google Scholar

Amigoni, David, and Regis, Amber K.. ‘Introduction: (Re)Reading John Addington Symonds (1840–1893).’ English Studies 94.2 (2013): 131–136.Google Scholar

Anderson, Amanda. The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Anthony, Peter D. John Ruskin’s Labour: A Study of Ruskin’s Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Isobel. Novel Politics: Democratic Imaginations in Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, Isobel. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics and Politics. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. The Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold. 11 vols. Ed. Super, R. H.. Volume III: Lectures and Essays in Criticism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Arscott, Caroline. ‘Poynter and the Arty.’ After the Pre-Raphaelites. 135–151.Google Scholar

Arscott, Caroline. William Morris and Edward Burne-Jones. Interlacings. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Ashton, Rosemary. The German Idea: Four English Writers and the Reception of German Thought 1800–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. B. ‘Art Politics and Proceedings.’ Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 63 (July–December 1866): 189–205.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. B. ‘The Royal Academy and Other Exhibitions.’ Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 67 (July–December 1867): 79–98.Google Scholar

Avery-Quash, Susanna, and Sheldon, Julie. Art for the Nation: The Eastlakes and the Victorian Art World. London: National Gallery and Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Avery-Quash, Susanna. Ed. The Travel Notebooks of Sir Charles Eastlake. 2 vols. London: Walpole Society, 2011.Google Scholar

Bailkin, Jordanna. The Culture of Property: The Crisis of Liberalism in Modern Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Baker, Malcolm, and Richardson, Brenda. A Grand Design: The Art of the Victoria and Albert Museum. London: V & A Publications, 1999.Google Scholar

Bann, Stephen. The Clothing of Clio: A Study of the Representation of History in Nineteenth-Century Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Bann, Stephen. ‘Generating the Renaissance, or the Individualisation of Culture.’ The Point of Theory: Practices of Cultural Analysis. Ed. Bal, Mieke and Boer, Inge. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1994. 145–154.Google Scholar

Barlow, Paul. ‘“Fire, Flatulence and Fog”: The Decoration of the Westminster Palace and the Aesthetics of Prudence.’ Governing Cultures. 67–82.Google Scholar

Barlow, Paul, and Trodd, Colin. Eds. Governing Cultures: Art Institutions in Victorian London. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000.Google Scholar

Barnett, Henrietta O. ‘Pictures for the People.’ Cornhill Magazine XLVII (January–June 1883): 344–352.Google Scholar

Barrell, John. The Political Theory of Painting from Reynolds to Hazlitt. ‘The Body of the Public.’ New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Barringer, Tim. Men at Work: Art and Labour in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Barringer, Tim. Reading the Pre-Raphaelites. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998.Google Scholar

Barringer, Tim, and Giebelhausen, Michaela. Eds. Writing the Pre-Raphaelites: Text, Context, Subtext. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Barringer, Tim, and Prettejohn, Elizabeth. Eds. Frederic Leighton: Antiquity, Renaissance, Modernity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. Liberty. Ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Jay. The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Adorno. Cambridge: Polity, 1992.Google Scholar

Birch, Dinah. ‘John Ruskin: Political Economy and the Culture of “Social Affection”,’ Ruskin Review and Bulletin 10.1 (2014): 11–18.Google Scholar

Birch, Dinah. Ruskin’s Myths. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Birch, Dinah. ‘Ruskin’s “Womanly Mind.”’ Essays in Criticism 38.3 (1988): 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, Dinah. Ed. Ruskin and the Dawn of the Modern. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Birch, Dinah and O’Gorman, Francis. Eds. Ruskin and Gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, Kathleen. Pleasures of Benthamism: Victorian Literature, Utility, Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Boase, T. S. R. ‘The Decoration of the New Palace of Westminster, 1841–1863.’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 17.3/4 (1954): 319–358.Google Scholar

Boime, Albert. ‘Turner’s Slave Ship: The Victims of Empire.’ Turner Studies 10.1 (1990): 34–43.Google Scholar

Boos, Florence S. ‘William Morris’s “Equality”: A Critical Edition.’ The Journal of Pre-Raphaelite Studies 20.1 (Spring 2011): 51–70.Google Scholar

Boos, Florence S., and Silver, Carole G.. Eds. Socialism and the Literary Artistry of William Morris. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Booth, Howard J. ‘“A Certain Disarray of Faculties”: Surpassing the Modernist Reception of Symonds.’ John Addington Symonds. 154–169.Google Scholar

Booth, Howard J. ‘Same-Sex Desire, Ethics, and Double-Mindedness: The Correspondence of Henry Graham Dakyns, Henry Sedgwick and John Addington Symonds.’ Journal of European Studies 32 (2002): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brake, Laurel. ‘After Studies: The Cancelled Book.’ Print in Transition, 1850–1910: Studies in Media and Book History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.Google Scholar

Brake, Laurel, Higgins, Lesley, and Williams, Carolyn. Eds. Walter Pater: Transparencies of Desire. Greensboro, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bristow, Joseph. Effeminate England: Homoerotic Writing after 1885. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Bristow, Joseph. ‘Symonds’s History, Ellis’s Heredity: Sexual Inversion.’ Sexology in Culture: Labelling Bodies and Desires. Ed. Bland, Lucy and Doan, Laura. Cambridge: Polity, 1998. 79–99.Google Scholar

Bullen, J. B. The Myth of the Renaissance in Nineteenth-Century Writing. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullen, J. B. ‘Pater and Ruskin on Michelangelo: Two Contrasting Views.’ Prose Studies 4.1 (1981): 55–73.Google Scholar

Bullen, J. B. ‘Ruskin, Venice and the Construction of Femininity.’ Review of English Studies 46 (1995): 502–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burd, Van Akin. ‘Background to Modern Painters: The Tradition and the Turner Controversy.’ PMLA 74.3 (June 1959): 254–267.Google Scholar

Burns, Arthur, and Innes, Joanna. Eds. Rethinking the Age of Reform: Britain 1780–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Burton, Anthony. Vision and Accident: The Story of the Victoria and Albert Museum. London: V & A Publications, 1999.Google Scholar

Calendar, History, and General Summary of Regulations. Great Britain Department of Science and Art. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1893.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig. Ed. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cannadine, David. ‘Joseph Gillott and His Family Firm: The Many Faces of Entrepreneurship.’ From Family Firms to Corporate Capitalism: Essays in Business and Industrial History in Honour of Peter Mathias. Ed. Bruland, Kristine and O’Brien, Patrick. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlisle, Janice. Picturing Reform in Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Carlyle in Thirty Volumes. Volume X: Past and Present. Ed. Trail, Henry Duff. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd., 1897.Google Scholar

Casteras, Susan P. and Denny, Colleen. Eds. The Grosvenor Gallery: A Palace of Art in Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Caygill, Howard. Art of Judgement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Ciewszkowski, K. ‘Millbank before the Tate.’ The Tate Gallery 1984–86: Illustrated Biennial Report. London: Tate Gallery, 1986. 38–43.Google Scholar

Clements, Elicia, and Higgins, Lesley. Eds. Victorian Aesthetic Conditions: Pater across the Arts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Codell, Julie F. ‘The Art Press and Its Parodies: Unravelling Networks in Swinburne’s 1868 Academy Notes.’ Victorian Periodicals Review 44.2 (2011): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Codell, Julie F. The Victorian Artist: Artists’ Life Writings in Britain c. 1870–1910. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Coit, Emily. ‘“This Immense Expense of Art”: George Eliot and John Ruskin on Consumption and the Limits of Sympathy.’ Nineteenth Century Literature 65.2 (2010): 214–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colley, Linda. Britons: Forging the Nation 1707–1837. London: Pimlico, 1992.Google Scholar

Collini, Stefan. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Colvin, Sidney. ‘The Grosvenor Gallery.’ Fortnightly Review 21 (1877): 820–833.Google Scholar

Colvin, Sidney. ‘Studies in the History of the Renaissance.’ Pall Mall Gazette (1 March 1873): 11–12.Google Scholar

‘The Competition at Westminster Hall.’ Athenaeum (10 July 1847): 737.Google Scholar

Conlin, Jonathan. ‘Gladstone and Christian Art, 1832–1854.’ The Historical Journal 46.2 (2003): 341–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conlin, Jonathan. The Nation’s Mantelpiece: A History of the National Gallery. London: Pallas Athene, 2006.Google Scholar

Conner, Patrick. ‘Ruskin and the “Ancient Masters” in Modern Painters.’ New Approaches to Ruskin. Ed. Hewison, Robert. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981. 17–32.Google Scholar

Cook, E. T. ‘Fine Art in Whitechapel.’ Magazine of Art 7 (1884): 345–347.Google Scholar

Courthope, W. J. ‘Modern Culture.’ The Quarterly Review 137 (1874): 389–415.Google Scholar

Courthope, W. J. ‘Renaissance in Italy: The Age of Despots. The Revival of Learning. The Fine Arts. By John Addington Symonds. London, 1875–77.’ The Quarterly Review 145 (1877): 1–34.Google Scholar

Cowling, Maurice. 1867: Disraeli, Gladstone and Revolution: The Passing of the Second Reform Bill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Craig, David M. John Ruskin and the Ethics of Consumption. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2006.Google Scholar

Crow, Thomas E. Painters and Public Life in Eighteenth-Century Paris. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Crowe, J. A., and Cavalcaselle, J. B.. A New History of Painting in Italy from the Second to the Sixteenth Century. 3 vols. London: John Murray, 1864–1866.Google Scholar

Culver, Stuart. ‘Whistler v. Ruskin: The Courts, the Public, and Modern Art.’ The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere. Ed. Burt, Richard and Wallen, Jeffrey. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. 149–167.Google Scholar

Dale, Peter Allen. ‘Beyond Humanism: J. A. Symonds and the Replotting of the Renaissance.’ Clio 17.2 (1988): 109–137.Google Scholar

Dale, Peter Allen. ‘“Distractions of Spirit”: Walter Pater and Modernity.’ Papers in Literature and Language 28 (1992): 319–349.Google Scholar

Dale, Peter Allen. The Victorian Critic and the Idea of History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Daley, Kenneth. The Rescue of Romanticism: Walter Pater and John Ruskin. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Danahay, Martin A. Gender at Work in Victorian Culture: Literature, Art and Masculinity. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Davies, Llewelyn. Ed. The Working Men’s College 1854–1904, Records of Its History and Its Work for Fifty Years by Members of the College. London: Macmillan, 1904.Google Scholar

Davis, Whitney. ‘The Image in the Middle: John Addington Symonds and Homoerotic Art Criticism.’ After the Pre-Raphaelites. 188–216.Google Scholar

Davis, Whitney. Queer Beauty: Sexuality and Aesthetics from Winckelmann to Freud and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLaura, David. J. Hebrew and Hellene in Victorian England: Newman, Arnold, and Pater. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1969.Google Scholar

DeLaura, David. J. ‘The “Wordsworth” of Pater and Arnold: “The Supreme Artistic View of Life.”’ Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 6.4 (1966): 651–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dellamora, Richard. Masculine Desire: The Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Denis, Rafael Cardosa, and Trodd, Colin. Eds. Art and the Academy in the Nineteenth Century. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dirks, Nicholas B., Eley, Geoff, and Ortner, Sherry B.. Eds. Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Dixon, Joy. ‘Havelock Ellis and John Addington Symonds, Sexual Inversion (1897).’ Victorian Review 35.1 (2009): 72–77.Google Scholar

Dollimore, Jonathan. Sexual Dissidence: Augustine to Wilde, Freud to Foucault. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Donoghue, Denis. Walter Pater: Lover of Strange Souls. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar

Dowling, Linda. Hellenism and Homosexuality in Victorian Oxford. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Dowling, Linda. The Vulgarisation of Art: The Victorians and Aesthetic Democracy. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar

Drescher, Seymour. Dilemmas of Democracy: Tocqueville and Modernisation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Eagles, John. ‘The Exhibitions. British Institution, &c.’ Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine XL (October 1836): 543–556.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Eastham, Andrew. ‘Characterless Aesthetics: Pater, Wilde, and the End of Hegelian Hellenism.’ Journal of Pre-Raphaelite Studies 23 (2014): 19–36.Google Scholar

Eastham, Andrew. ‘Walter Pater’s Acoustic Space: “The School of Giorgione,” Dionysian Anders-streben, and the Politics of Soundscape.’ The Yearbook of English Studies 40.1/2 (2010): 196–216.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Contributions to the Literature of the Fine Arts. London: John Murray, 1848.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Contributions to the Literature of the Fine Arts. Ed. Ker, H. Bellenden. 2nd edn. London: John Murray, 1870.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Materials for a History of Oil Painting. 2 vols. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1847.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Method and Materials of Painting of the Great Schools and Masters. 2 vols. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1960.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Second Series. Contributions to the Literature of the Fine Arts. With a Memoir Compiled by Lady Eastlake. London: John Murray, 1870.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Trans. Goethe’s Theory of Colours; Translated from the German by Charles Lock Eastlake, R. A. F. R. S. London: John Murray, 1840.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Charles Lock. Ed. A Handbook of the History of Painting, from the Age of Constantine the Great to the Present Time; by Dr. Franz Kugler. Translated from the German by a Lady. Part I. The Italian Schools of Painting. Edited, with Notes by Charles L. Eastlake. London: John Murray, 1842.Google Scholar

Eastlake, Elizabeth. ‘Review of Modern Painters I, II, III, Academy Notes 1855.’ Quarterly Review XCVIII (1856): 384–433.Google Scholar

Ellis, Havelock, and Symonds, John Addington. Sexual Inversion. Volume 1. Studies in the Psychology of Sex, by Havelock Ellis. London: Wilson and Macmillan, 1897.Google Scholar

Ellis, Havelock, and Symonds, John Addington. Sexual Inversion: A Critical Edition. Ed. Crozier, Ivan. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar

Engelmann, Stephen G. Imagining Interest in Political Thought: Origins of Economic Rationality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Evangelista, Stefan. British Aestheticism and Ancient Greece: Hellenism, Reception, Gods in Exile. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evangelista, Stefan. ‘“Lovers and Philosophers at Once”: Aesthetic Platonism in the Victorian “Fin-de-Siècle”.’ Yearbook of English Studies 36.2 (2006): 230–244.Google Scholar

Faulkner, Peter. Against the Age: An Introduction to William Morris. London: Allen & Unwin, 1980.Google Scholar

Faulkner, Peter. Ed. William Morris: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.Google Scholar

Fenton, James. ‘Ruskin as Arbiter of Taste.’ School of Genius: A History of the Royal Academy of Arts. London: Salamander Press Ltd for Royal Academy, 2006. 213–231.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Wallace K. The Renaissance in Historical Thought: Five Centuries of Interpretation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1948.Google Scholar

Fisher, Will. ‘The Sexual Politics of Victorian Historiographical Writing about the “Renaissance”.’ GLQ: Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 14.1 (2008): 41–67.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Pamela M., and Helmreich, Anne. Eds. The Rise of the Modern Art Market in London, 1850–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Flint, Kate. The Victorians and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Fontana, Ernest. ‘Whitman, Pater, and “An English Poet”.’ Walt Whitman Quarterly Review 14.1 (1996): 12–20.Google Scholar

Fontana, Ernest. ‘Working Speakers in Whitman and Hopkins.’ Walt Whitman Quarterly Review 7 (1990): 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Force, Pierre. Self-Interest before Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Hilary. ‘“Always Reminding Us of the Body”: J. A. Symonds on the Fine Arts.’ English Studies 94.2 (2013): 188–205.Google Scholar

Fraser, Hilary. The Victorians and Renaissance Italy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Fraser, Hilary. Women Writing Art History: Looking Like a Woman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Freedman, Jonathan. Professions of Taste: Henry James, British Aestheticism, and Commodity Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Gagnier, Regina. ‘The Law of Progress and the Ironies of Individualism in the Nineteenth Century.’ New Literary History 31.2 (2000): 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagnier, Regina. On the Insatiability of Human Wants: Economics and Aesthetics in Market Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Garratt, Peter. ‘Ruskin’s Modern Painters and the Visual Language of Reality.’ Journal of Victorian Culture 14.1 (2009): 53–71.Google Scholar

‘The German School.’ Punch, or the London Charivari X (1845): 145.Google Scholar

Getsy, David. ‘Recognising the Homoerotic: The Uses of Intersubjectivity in John Addington Symonds’s 1887 Essays on Art.’ Visual Culture in Britain 8.1 (2007): 37–57.Google Scholar

‘Gigantic Art as High Art.’ Fine Arts Journal 1 (1846): 65–67.Google Scholar

Glover, David. ‘Palaces and Sweatshops: East End Fictions and East End Politics.’ Literature, Immigration, and Diaspora in Fin-de-Siècle England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 47–79.Google Scholar

Gosse, Edmund. ‘Renaissance in Italy. Renaissance in Italy. The Age of Despots: The Revival of Learning: The Fine Arts. By John Addington Symonds. 3 vols. London: Smith, Elder & Co.’ The Westminster Review 108 (1877): 351–374.Google Scholar

Gray, John. Mill on Liberty: A Defence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.Google Scholar

Grewe, Cordula. Painting the Sacred in the Age of Romanticism. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Gunn, J. A. W. ‘“Interest Will Not Lie”: A Seventeenth-Century Political Maxim.’ Journal of the History of Ideas 29.4 (1968): 551–564.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, Thomas. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hadley, Elaine. Living Liberalism: Practical Citizenship in Mid-Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Hale, J. R. England and the Italian Renaissance. London: Faber & Faber, 1954.Google Scholar

Hall, Anna Maria. ‘Two Visits to Westminster Hall, by Mrs. S. C. Hall.’ The Art Union 56 (1 August 1843): 219–220.Google Scholar

Hall, Catherine, McClelland, Keith, and Rendell, Jane. Defining the Nation: Class, Race and Gender and the British Reform Act of 1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hall, Samuel Carter. ‘Editor’s Column.’ The Art Journal N. S. III (1 December 1857): 361.Google Scholar

Halperin, David M. One Hundred Years of Homosexuality, and Other Essays on Greek Love. New York: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Hamerton, Philip G. ‘Mr. Poynter’s Lectures on Art.’ The International Review VIII (1880): 619–631.Google Scholar

Hamerton, Philip G. ‘Mr. Poynter’s Lectures on Art.’ The International Review IX (1881): 69–82.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, Robert. Robert Vernon’s Gift: British Art for the Nation 1847. London: Tate Gallery, 1993.Google Scholar

Hanley, Keith. ‘The Stains of Time: Ruskin and Romantic Discourses of Tradition.’ The Lamp of Memory: Ruskin, Tradition and Architecture. Ed. Wheeler, Michael and Whiteley, Nigel. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992. 98–122.Google Scholar

Hanson, David C. ‘Self and Revision in Ruskin’s Revaluation of Romanticism, 1830–1880.’ Studies in Romanticism 39 (2000): 255–302.Google Scholar

Harris, Wendell V. ‘Ruskin’s Theoretic Practicality and the Royal Academy’s Aesthetic Idealism.’ Nineteenth-Century Literature 52.1 (June 1997): 80–102.Google Scholar

Hartley, Lucy. ‘Art.’ The Cambridge Companion to John Ruskin. Ed. O’Gorman, Francis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. 83–99.Google Scholar

Hartley, Lucy. ‘Democracy at the Crossroads: Tocqueville, Mill, and the Conflict of Interests.’ The American Experiment and the Idea of Democracy in British Culture, 1776–1914. Ed. Dzelainis, Ella and Livesey, Ruth. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2013. 101–126.Google Scholar

Hartley, Lucy. ‘John Stuart Mill.’ Oxford Bibliographies Online: Victorian Literature. Ed. John, Juliet. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199799558/obo-9780199799558-0100.xml?rskey=wGdHFQ&result=45.Google Scholar

Harvie, Christopher. The Lights of Liberalism: University Liberals and the Challenge of Democracy, 1860–86. London: Allen Lane, 1976.Google Scholar

Haslam, Roy. ‘Looking, Drawing and Learning with John Ruskin at the Working Men’s College.’ Journal of Art & Design Education 7.1 (1988): 65–79.Google Scholar

Heidt, Sarah J. ‘“Let JAS Words Stand”: Publishing John Addington Symonds’s Desires.’ Victorian Studies 46.1 (2003): 7–31.Google Scholar

Heleniak, Kathryn Moore. ‘Victorian Collections and British Nationalism: Vernon, Sheepshanks and the National Gallery of British Art.’ Journal of the History of Collections 12.1 (2000): 91–107.Google Scholar

Helsinger, Elizabeth K. ‘Ruskin and the Aesthetics of Colour.’ Nineteenth-Century Prose. Special Issue: John Ruskin 35.1 (2008): 13–36.Google Scholar

Helsinger, Elizabeth K. Ruskin and the Art of the Beholder. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Helsinger, Elizabeth K. ‘Ruskin and the Politics of Viewing: Constructing National Subjects.’ Nineteenth-Century Contexts 18.2 (1994): 125–146.Google Scholar

Hewison, Robert. John Ruskin: The Argument of the Eye. London: Thames & Hudson, 1976.Google Scholar

Hewison, Robert. Ed. New Approaches to Ruskin. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar

Hext, Kate. Walter Pater: Individualism and Aesthetic Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hipple, Walter John. The Beautiful, the Sublime, and the Picturesque in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetic Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. ‘The Concept of Interest: From Euphemism to Tautology.’ Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays. New York: Viking Penguin, 1986. 35–55.Google Scholar

Hoch, Adrian S. ‘The Art of Alessandro Botticelli through the Eyes of Victorian Aesthetes.’ Victorian and Edwardian Responses to the Italian Renaissance. Ed. Law, John E. and Østermark-Johansen, Lene. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005. 55–85.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hoock, Holger. The King’s Artists: The Royal Academy of Arts and the Politics of British Culture 1760–1840. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hoock, Holger. ‘Reforming Culture: National Art Institutions in the Age of Reform.’ Rethinking the Age of Reform. 254–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, F. K. The Book of Art: Cartoons, Frescoes, Sculpture and Decorative Art as Applied to the New Houses of Parliament. London: Jeremiah How, 1846.Google Scholar

Hunt, John Dixon. ‘Ut pictoria poesis, the Picturesque and John Ruskin.’ Modern Language Notes (1978): 794–818.Google Scholar

Hutton, Richard Holt. ‘Mr. Pater’s Critical Essays.’ The Spectator 46 (14 June 1873): 764–765.Google Scholar

Inman, Billie. ‘Ruskin’s Reasoned Criticism of Art.’ Papers on Language and Literature 13 (1977): 372–382.Google Scholar

Inman, Billie. Walter Pater’s Reading: A Bibliography of His Library Borrowings, 1858–73. New York: Garland Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar

James, Henry. ‘The Picture Season in London.’ The Galaxy 24.2 (1877): 149–161.Google Scholar

Kahan, Alan. Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. 1790. Trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1987.Google Scholar

Karlholm, Dan. Art of Illusion: The Representation of Art History in Nineteenth-Century Germany and Beyond. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006.Google Scholar

Kestner, Joseph A. ‘Constructing the Renaissance: Leighton and Pater.’ Journal of Pre-Raphaelite & Aesthetic Studies 2.1 (1993): 1–15.Google Scholar

Kestner, Joseph A. Masculinities in Victorian Painting. Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kestner, Joseph A. ‘Poynter and Leighton as Aestheticians: The Ten Lectures and Addresses.’ Journal of Pre-Raphaelite & Aesthetic Studies 2.1 (1982): 108–120.Google Scholar

Kim, Jongwoo Jeremy. Painted Men in Britain, 1868–1918: Royal Academicians and Masculinities. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar

Klonk, Charlotte. ‘Mounting Vision: Charles Eastlake and the National Gallery of London.’ The Art Bulletin 82.2 (2000): 331–347.Google Scholar

Koven, Seth. ‘The Whitechapel Picture Exhibitions and the Politics of Seeing.’ Museum Culture: Histories, Discourses, Spectacles. Ed. Sherman, Daniel J. and Rogoff, Irit. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. 22–48.Google Scholar

Landow, George. The Aesthetic and Critical Theories of John Ruskin. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Landow, George. ‘The Art Journal, 1850–1880: Antiquarians, the Medieval Revival, and the Reception of Pre-Raphaelitism.’ The Pre-Raphaelite Review 2 (1979): 71–76.Google Scholar

Landow, George. ‘Ruskin’s Refutation of “False Opinions Held Concerning Beauty”.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1968): 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leighton, Frederic. Addresses Delivered to the Students of the Royal Academy by the Late Lord Leighton. 2nd ed. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., 1897.Google Scholar

Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Poetry and Painting. 1766. Trans. McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Levey, Michael. ‘Botticelli and Nineteenth-Century England.’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 233/234 (1960): 291–306.Google Scholar

Levine, Caroline. ‘Visual Labour: Ruskin’s Radical Realism.’ Victorian Literature and Culture 28.1 (2000): 73–86.Google Scholar

Livesey, Ruth. ‘Morris, Carpenter, Wilde, and the Political Aesthetics of Labour.’ Victorian Literature and Culture 32.2 (2004): 601–616.Google Scholar

Livesey, Ruth. Socialism, Sex and the Culture of Aestheticism in Britain, 1880–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Bradley J. William Morris and the Aesthetic Constitution of Politics. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alisdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. London: Duckworth, 1985.Google Scholar

McLean, Janet. ‘Prince Albert and the Fine Arts Commission.’ The Houses of Parliament. 213–223.Google Scholar

Macleod, Dianne Sachko. Art and the Victorian Middle Class: Money and the Making of Cultural Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Mahoney, Kristin. ‘Work, Lack and Longing: Rossetti’s “The Blessed Damozel” and the Working Men’s College.’ Victorian Studies 52.2 (2010): 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltz, Diana. British Aestheticism and the Urban Working Classes, 1870–1930: Beauty for the People. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Mandler, Peter. ‘Art in a Cool Climate: The Cultural Policy of the British State in European Context, c. 1780 to c. 1850.’ Unity and Diversity in European Culture c. 1800. Ed. Blanning, Tim and Schulze, Hagen. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 2006. 101–120.Google Scholar

Mangam, James A., and Walvin, James. Eds. Manliness and Morality: Middle-Class Masculinity in Britain and America, 1800–1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jayne. Ed. Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Marsh, Jan. ‘Ruskin and Turner’s Slavers: Patriotic, Political and Pictorial Issues.’ Visual Culture in Britain 2.1 (2001): 47–63.Google Scholar

Mathiowetz, Dean. Appeals to Interest: Language, Contestation, and the Shaping of Political Agency. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Mathiowetz, Dean. ‘The Juridical Subject of “Interest.”’ Political Theory 35.4 (2007): 468–493.Google Scholar

Maynard, Frederic W. Descriptive Notice of the Drawings and Publications of the Arundel Society, Arranged in the Order of Their Issue. London: J. B. Nichols and Sons, 1869.Google Scholar

Merrill, Linda. A Pot of Paint: Aesthetics on Trial in Whistler v. Ruskin. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Ed. Robson, John M.. 33 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963–1991. Volume III: Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy (Books III–V and Appendices). 1965. Volume X: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. 1985. Volume XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society. Part I. 1977.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. ‘Civilisation.’ The London and Westminster Review V (April 1836): 1–16.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. ‘1. De la Democratie en Amérique. Par Alexis de Tocqueville, Membre de l’Institut. 4 vols. 8vo. Paris: 1835–40. 2. Democracy in America. By Alexis de Tocqueville, Member of the Institute of France. Translated by Henry Reeve, Esq., Barrister-at-Law. 4 vols. 8vo. London: 1835–40.’ The Edinburgh Review LXXII (October 1840): 1–47.Google Scholar

Millman, Richard. Britain and the Eastern Question, 1875–1878. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Minnihan, Janet. The Nationalisation of Culture: The Development of State Subsidies to the Arts in Great Britain. New York: New York University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. ‘Introduction: Utopia and Critique.’ Art and the Public Sphere. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. 1–5.Google Scholar

Monkhouse, Cosmo. ‘The Life and Work of Sir Edward J. Poynter, President of the Royal Academy.’ Scribners Magazine XXII (1897): 701–720.Google Scholar

Monsman, Gerald. Oxford University’s Old Mortality Society: A Study in Victorian Romanticism. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Morgan, Benjamin. ‘Aesthetic Freedom: Walter Pater and the Politics of Autonomy.’ ELH 77.3 (2010): 731–756.Google Scholar

Morley, John. ‘Mr. Pater’s Essays.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. XIII (April 1873): 469–477.Google Scholar

Morley, John. ‘The Death of Mr. Mill.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. XIII (June 1873): 669–676.Google Scholar

Morris, May. William Morris. Artist Writer Socialist. Volume the First. The Art of William Morris. Morris as a Writer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1936.Google Scholar

Morris, May. William Morris. Artist Writer Socialist. Volume the Second. Morris as a Socialist. With an Account of William Morris as I Knew Him by Bernard Shaw. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1936.Google Scholar

Morris, William. The Collected Works of William Morris, with Introductions by His Daughter May Morris. 24 vols. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1910–1915. Volume I. The Defence of Guenevere. The Hollow Land. 1910. Volume II. The Life and Death of Jason. 1910. Volume XXII. Hopes and Fears for Art. Lectures on Art and Industry. 1914.Volume XXIII. Signs of Change. Lectures on Socialism. 1915.Google Scholar

Morris, William. Architecture, Industry and Wealth; Collected Papers by William Morris. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1902.Google Scholar

Morris, William. ‘Art and Socialism: The Aims and Ideals of the Socialists of To-day.’ Leek Bijou Reprint No. VII. 1884.Google Scholar

Morris, William. ‘Art under Plutocracy.’ To-Day: The Monthly Magazine of Scientific Socialism, N. S. I. 2 & I. 3 (February and March 1884): 79–90 and 159–176.Google Scholar

Morris, William. ‘The Exhibition of the Royal Academy. By a Rare Visitor.’ To-Day: The Monthly Magazine of Scientific Socialism N. S. II.7 (July 1884): 75–91.Google Scholar

Morris, William. ‘Individualism in the Royal Academy.’ Justice: The Organ of the Social Democracy I.21 (31 May 1884): 140–143.Google Scholar

Morris, William. ‘The Reward of Genius.’ Commonweal 2.37 (25 September 1886): 204–206.Google Scholar

Nisbet, Gideon. Greek Epigram in Reception: J. A. Symonds, Oscar Wilde and the Invention of Desire, 1805–1929. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, Francis. ‘Did Ruskin Support the Pre-Raphaelites?’ Persistent Ruskin: Studies in Influence, Assimilation and Effect. Ed. Hanley, Keith and Maidment, Brian. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2013. 81–92.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, Francis. ‘John Ruskin and Contemporary Economics.’ Ruskin Review and Bulletin 10.1 (2014): 4–10.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, Francis. ‘Ruskin’s Aesthetic of Failure in The Stones of Venice.’ Review of English Studies 55 (2004): 374–391.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, Francis. Ed. The Cambridge Companion to John Ruskin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Oliphant, Margaret. ‘New Books: Pater’s History of the Renaissance.’ Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 114 (November 1873): 604–609.Google Scholar

Oliphant, Margaret. ‘The Royal Academy.’ Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine 119 (1876): 753–769.Google Scholar

Ormond, Richmond. ‘John Partridge and the Fine Arts Commissioners.’ The Burlington Magazine 109.772 (1967): 397–403.Google Scholar

Orsini, G. N. G. ‘Symonds and De Sanctis: A Study in the Historiography of the Renaissance.’ Studies in the Renaissance 11 (1964): 151–187.Google Scholar

Østermark-Johansen, Lene. Sweetness and Strength: The Reception of Michelangelo in Late Victorian England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar

Østermark-Johansen, Lene. Walter Pater and the Language of Sculpture. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar

‘The Palace of Art (New Version).’ Punch, or the London Charivari 72 (7 July 1877): 305 and 73 (14 July 1877): 9.Google Scholar

Pappe, H. O. ‘Mill and Tocqueville.’ Journal of the History of Ideas 25.2 (1964): 217–234.Google Scholar

‘Passing Events.’ The Art Journal N. S. LIX (July 1897): 287–288.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. The Works of Walter Pater. Library Edition. 10 vols. London: Macmillan and Co., 1917–20. I. The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry. 1919. V. Appreciations. With an Essay on Style. 1918. VI. Plato and Platonism. A Series of Lectures. VII. Greek Studies. A Series of Essays. 1918. VIII. Miscellaneous Studies. A Series of Essays. 1917. X. Essays from ‘The Guardian.” 1918.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Coleridge’s Writings.’ Westminster Review N. S. XXIX (January and April 1866): 106–132.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘The English School of Painting.’ The Oxford Magazine (25 February 1885): 113.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘A Fragment on Sandro Botticelli.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. VIII (August 1870): 155–160.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘The Myth of Demeter and Persephone.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. XIX (January and February 1876): 82–95 and 260–276.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Notes on Leonardo da Vinci.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. VI (November 1869): 494–508.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘On Wordsworth.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. XV (April 1874): 455–465.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Pico della Mirandola.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. X (October 1871): 377–386.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Poems by William Morris.’ Westminster Review N. S. XXXIV (July and October 1868): 300–312.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘The Poetry of Michelangelo.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. X (November 1871): 559–570.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry. The 1893 Text. Ed. Hill, Donald L.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Renaissance in Italy; the Age of Despots. By John Addington Symonds (London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1875).’ The Academy VIII.169 N.S. (31 July 1875): 105–106.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Romanticism.’ Macmillan’s Magazine 35 (November 1876): 64–70.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘The School of Giorgione.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. XXII (July–December 1877): 526–538.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘A Study of Dionysus.’ Fortnightly Review N. S. XX (July 1876): 752–772.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter H. ‘Winckelmann.’ Westminster Review N. S. XXXI (January and April 1867): 80–110.Google Scholar

Mrs. Pattison, Mark. ‘Art.’ Westminster Review N. S. XLIII (April 1873): 639–641.Google Scholar

Pearson, Nicholas M. The State and the Visual Arts: A Discussion of State Intervention in the Visual Arts in Britain, 1760–1981. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Pemble, John. Ed. John Addington Symonds: Culture and the Demon Desire. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar

Penny, Nicholas. ‘John Ruskin and Tintoretto.’ Apollo 99 (1974): 268–273.Google Scholar

Perry, Lara. History’s Beauties: Women and the National Portrait Gallery, 1856–1900. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Peters, Robert L. ‘Athens and Troy: Notes on John Addington Symonds’s Aestheticism.’ English Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 5.5 (1962): 14–26.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Pointon, Marcia. William Dyce 1806–1864: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Pointon, Marcia. Ed. Art Apart: Art Institutions and Ideology across England and North America. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pointon, Marcia. Ed. Pre-Raphaelites Re-Viewed. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Postle, Martin. ‘Samuel Palmer and the Slade: Correspondence by Prominent Victorian Artists Concerning the Foundation of the Slade School of Fine Art.’ Apollo 133 (1991): 252–257.Google Scholar

Potts, Alex. Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Potts, Alex. ‘Pungent Prophecies of Art: Symonds, Pater, and Michelangelo.’ John Addington Symonds. 102–121.Google Scholar

Poynter, Edward J. Ten Lectures on Art. 1879. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1880.Google Scholar

Poynter, Edward J. The National Gallery of British Art (Millbank) Illustrated Catalogue. London: Cassell and Co., 1902.Google Scholar

Poynter, Edward J. Ed. The National Gallery. 3 vols. London: Cassell, 1899–1900.Google Scholar

Poynter, Edward J., and Buxton, Henry Wilmot. German, Flemish and Dutch Painting. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, 1881.Google Scholar

Poynter, Edward J., and Head, Percy R.. Classic and Italian Painting. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, 1880.Google Scholar

Poynter, Edward J., and Smith, Thomas Roger. Architecture, Gothic and Renaissance. London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, 1880.Google Scholar

Prettejohn, Elizabeth. The Art of the Pre-Raphaelites. London: Tate Gallery, 2007.Google Scholar

Prettejohn, Elizabeth. Beauty & Art 1750–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Prettejohn, Elizabeth. Ed. After the Pre-Raphaelites: Art and Aestheticism in Victorian England. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Prochaska, Frank. Eminent Victorians on American Democracy: The View from Albion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Psomaides, Kathy A. Beauty’s Body: Femininity and Representation in British Aestheticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Puetz, Anne. ‘An Apollo in Action: Sir Charles Eastlake’s The Spartan Isadas at the Siege of Thebes at the Royal Academy Exhibition of 1827.’ The Courtauld Institute of Art Newsletter 11 (Summer 2001): 2.Google Scholar

‘Punch’s Fine Art Exhibition.’ Punch IX (1845): 88.Google Scholar

Quinn, Josephine Crawley, and Brooke, Christopher. ‘“Affection in Education”: Edward Carpenter, John Addington Symonds, and the Politics of Greek Love.’ Oxford Review of Education 37.5 (2011): 683–698.Google Scholar

Regis, Amber K. The Memoirs of John Addington Symonds. A Critical Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar

Reitlinger, Gerald. The Economics of Taste: The Rise and Fall of Picture Prices 1760–1960. 3 vols. London: Barrie and Rockcliff, 1961–1970.Google Scholar

‘A Reverie on Mr. Poynter’s “Israel in Egypt”.’ The Spectator 40 (18 May 1867): 549–550.Google Scholar

‘Review of Poynter’s Ten Lectures on Art.’ The Artist (1880): 55–57, 90–91, 121–122.Google Scholar

Sir Reynolds, Joshua. Discourses on Art. Ed. Wark, Robert. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Riding, Christine, and Riding, Jacqueline. Eds. The Houses of Parliament: History, Art, Architecture. London: Merrell Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar

Robertson, David. Sir Charles Eastlake and the Victorian Art World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Robson, John. ‘Civilisation and Culture as Moral Concepts.’ The Cambridge Companion to Mill. 338–371.Google Scholar

Robson, John. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Roper, Jon. Democracy and Its Critics: Anglo-American Democratic Thought in the Nineteenth Century. London: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar

‘The Royal Academy.’ The Art Journal N. S. IV (1865): 161–172.Google Scholar

‘The Royal Academy.’ The Art Journal N. S. VI (1867): 137–146.Google Scholar

Ruskin, John. The Works of John Ruskin. Library Edition. 39 volumes. Ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander. London: George Allen, 1903–1912. Volumes III–VII. Modern Painters. 1903. Volume VIII. The Seven Lamps of Architecture. 1903. Volumes IX–XI. The Stones of Venice. 1903. Volumes XII. Lectures on Architecture and Painting, etc. 1904. Volume XVI. ‘A Joy For Ever’ and Two Paths, with Letters on the Oxford Museum and Various Addresses 1856–60. 1905. Volume XVII. Unto This Last, Munera Pulveris, Time and Tide, with Other Writings on Political Economy 1860–1873. 1905. Volume XX. Lectures on Art and Aratra Pentelici, with Lectures and Notes on Greek Art and Mythology. 1905. Volume XXII. Lectures on Landscape, Michelangelo & Tintoret, the Eagle’s Nest, Ariadne Florentina, with Notes for Other Oxford Lectures. 1906.Google Scholar

Ruskin, John. ‘C. L. Eastlake’s Methods and Materials for a History of Oil Painting,’ Quarterly Review 82 (1847): 390–427.Google Scholar

Ruskin, John. Letter. The Artists and Amateur’s Magazine (January 1844): 280–281.Google Scholar

‘Ruskin’s Edinburgh Lectures.’ The New Monthly Magazine (August 1854): 413–18.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. The Making of Modern Liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. Utilitarianism and Other Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar

Saunders, Robert. Democracy and the Vote in British Politics, 1848–1867. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar

Schneewind, Jerome B. ‘Moral Problems and Moral Philosophy in the Victorian Period.’ Victorian Studies 9, Supplement (1965): 29–46.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Seiler, R. M. Ed. The Book Beautiful: Walter Pater and the House of Macmillan. London: Athlone Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Semmel, Bernard. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, and Williams, Bernard. Eds. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Shenton, Caroline. The Day Parliament Burned Down. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Shenton, Caroline. Mr. Barry’s War: Rebuilding the Houses of Parliament after the Great Fire of 1834. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Shrimpton, Nicholas. ‘Pater and the “Aesthetical Sect.”’ Comparative Criticism: An Annual Journal 17 (1995): 61–84.Google Scholar

Shuter, William. ‘History as Palingenesis in Pater and Hegel.’ PMLA 86.3 (1971): 411–421.Google Scholar

Siegel, Jonah. ‘Black Arts, Ruined Cathedrals, and the Grave in Engineering: Ruskin and the Fatal Excess of Art.’ Victorian Literature and Culture 27.2 (1999): 395–417.Google Scholar

Siegel, Jonah. Desire and Excess: The Nineteenth-Century Culture of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Singh, Uday Mehta. Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Skorupski, John. Ed. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Smart, J. J. C., and Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism, For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Smith, Alison. The Victorian Nude. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Smith, Charles Saumarez. ‘The Institutionalisation of Art in Early Victorian England.’ The Colin Matthew Lecture for the Public Understanding of History. Gresham College. 11 November 2009.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan. ‘Ruskin’s “Analysis of Natural and Pictorial Forms”.’ Fact and Feeling: Baconian Science and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Madison: Wisconsin University Press, 1994. 152–179.Google Scholar

Spear, Jeffrey. Dreams of an English Eden: Ruskin and His Tradition in Social Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

‘The Spirit of Chivalry of the House of Commons.’ Punch, or the London Charivari IX (1845): 88.Google Scholar

Sprinker, Michael. ‘Ruskin on the Imagination.’ Studies in Romanticism 18.1 (1979): 115–139.Google Scholar

Stansky, Peter. Redesigning the World: William Morris, the 1880s, and the Arts and Crafts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Starn, Randolph. Ambrogio Lorenzetti. The Palazza Pubblico, Siena. New York: George Braziller, 1994.Google Scholar

Steegman, John. Consort of Taste, 1830–1870. London: Sidgwick and Jackson Ltd, 1950.Google Scholar

Stein, Richard. The Ritual of Interpretation: The Fine Arts as Literature in Ruskin, Rossetti, and Pater. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Stewart, Jules. Albert: A Life. London: I. B. Tauris, 2011.Google Scholar

Stoddart, Judith. Ruskin’s Culture Wars: Fors Clavigera and the Crisis of Victorian Liberalism. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1998.Google Scholar

‘Substance and Shadow. Cartoon No. 1.’ Punch, or the London Charivari V (1843): 22.Google Scholar

Summers, David. The Judgement of Sense: Renaissance Naturalism and the Rise of Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Sussman, Herbert. Victorian Masculinities: Manhood and Masculine Poetics in Early Victorian Literature and Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. Essays, Speculative and Suggestive. 1890. 3rd ed. London: John Murray, 1907.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. In the Key of Blue and Other Prose Essays. London: Elkin Mathews & John Lane, 1893.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. The Letters and Papers of John Addington Symonds. Ed. Brown, Horatio. London: John Murray, 1923.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. The Life of Benvenuto Cellini. By Himself. 1887. New York: Brentano’s, 1906.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. The Life of Michelangelo Buonarroti, Based on Studies in the Archives of the Buonarroti Family at Florence. 2 vols. London: John C. Nimmo, 1893Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. The Memoirs of John Addington Symonds. A Critical Edition. Ed. Regis, Amber K.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. The Memoirs of John Addington Symonds: The Secret Homosexual Life of a Leading Nineteenth-Century Man of Letters. Ed. Grosskurth, Phyllis. New York: Random House, 1984.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. A Problem in Greek Ethics. Being an Enquiry into the Phenomenon of Sexual Inversion, Addressed Especially to Medical Psychologists and Jurists. 1883. London: Privately Printed, 1901.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. A Problem in Modern Ethics. Being an Enquiry into the Phenomenon of Sexual Inversion, Addressed Especially to Medical Psychologists and Jurists. 1891. London: Privately Printed, 1901.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. The Renaissance: An Essay Read in the Theatre, Oxford, June 17, 1863. By John Addington Symonds, B. A. Fellow of Magdalen College. Oxford: Henry Hammans, 1863.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. Renaissance in Italy. Volume I. The Age of Despots. 1875. London: John Murray, 1920. Volume II. The Revival of Learning. 1877. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1897. Volume III. The Fine Arts. 1877. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1911. Volume IV, In Two Parts: Italian Literature. 1881. London: John Murray, 1914. Volume V, In Two Parts: The Catholic Reaction. 1886. London: John Murray, 1914.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. Sketches and Studies in Italy and Greece. London: Smith, Elder, & Co, 1879.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. ‘Studies in the History of the Renaissance. By Walter H. Pater. Macmillan and Co. 1873.’ The Academy IV.68 (15 March 1873): 103–105.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. Studies of the Greek Poets. First Series. London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1873. Studies of the Greek Poets. First Series. 2nd ed. London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1877. Studies of the Greek Poets. 2 vols. 3rd ed. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1893.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington. Walt Whitman: A Study. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1893.Google Scholar

Taylor, Brandon. Art for the Nation: Exhibitions and the London Public, 1747–2001. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Taylor, Brandon. ‘From Penitentiary to “Temple of Art”: Early Metaphors of Improvement at the Millbank Tate.’ Art Apart. 9–32.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Teukolsky, Rachel. The Literate Eye: Victorian Art Writing and Modernist Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Thomas, David Wayne. Cultivating Victorians: Liberal Culture and the Aesthetic. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. William Morris: Romantic to Revolutionary. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1955.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. 1835–1840. Trans. Reeve, Henry. New edition. 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Transactions of the National Association for the Advancement of Art and Its Application to Industry 1888–1891. 3 vols. New York: Garland Publishing, 1979.Google Scholar

Trodd, Colin. ‘Academic Cultures: The Royal Academy and the Commerce of Discourse in Victorian London.’ Art and the Academy in the Nineteenth Century. 178–193.Google Scholar

Trodd, Colin, and Denis, Rafael Cardoso. Eds. Art and the Academy in the Nineteenth Century. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Turner, Frank M. The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Tyrwhitt, R. St. John. ‘The Greek Spirit in Modern Literature.’ The Contemporary Review 29 (December 1876–May 1877): 552–566.Google Scholar

UK Parliament. Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates. 3rd Series. Vols. 1–189 (1830–1867).Google Scholar

UK Parliament. Report from the Select Committee on Arts and Their Connexion with Manufactures; with Minutes of Evidence, Appendix and Index. Parliamentary Papers (1835) V, and (1836) IX.1.Google Scholar

UK Parliament. Report from the Select Committee on Fine Arts; Together with Minutes of Evidence, Appendix, and Index. Parliamentary Papers (1841) VI.331.Google Scholar

UK Parliament. Report from the Select Committee on the National Gallery; Together with Minutes of Evidence, Appendix and Index. Parliamentary Papers (1850) XV.1.Google Scholar

UK Parliament. Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1842) XXV.105. Second Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1843) XXIX.197. Third Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1844) XXXI.169. Fourth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1845) XXVII.151. Fifth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1846) XXIV.253. Sixth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1846) XXIV.281. Seventh Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1847) XXXIII.267. Eight Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1849) XXII.349. Ninth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1850) XXIII.329. Tenth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1854) XIX.441. Eleventh Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1857-8) XXIV.201. Twelfth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1861) XXXII.213. Thirteenth Report of the Commissioners on the Fine Arts, with Appendix. Parliamentary Papers (1863) XVI.317.Google Scholar

Unrau, John. ‘Ruskin, the Workman and the Savageness of Gothic.’ New Approaches to Ruskin. 33–50.Google Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Vaninskaya, Anna. William Morris and the Idea of Community: Romance, History and Propaganda, 1880–1914. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Vasari, Giorgio. Lives of the Most Eminent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects: Translated from the Italian of Giorgio Vasari. With Notes and Illustrations Chiefly Selected from Various Commentators. By Mrs Jonathan Foster. 3 vols. London: Henry G. Bohn, 1851.Google Scholar

Vernon, James. Politics and the People: A Study in English Political Culture, c. 1815–1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

‘Victoria and Albert Museum.’ Survey of London: Volume 38, South Kensington Museums Area. Ed. Sheppard, F. H. W.. London: Athlone Press, 1975. 97–123.Google Scholar

Waagen, Gustav Friedrich. Works of Art and Artists in England. 3 vols. London: John Murray, 1838.Google Scholar

Waagen, Gustav Friedrich. Treasures of Art in Great Britain: Being an Account of the Chief Collections of Paintings, Drawings, Sculptures, Illuminated MSS., &c. &c. Trans. Eastlake, Elizabeth Rigby. 3 vols. London: John Murray, 1854, with a supplementary volume in 1857.Google Scholar

Walvin, James. The Zong: A Massacre, the Law and the End of Slavery. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Weeks, Jeffrey. Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. London: Quartet Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Weinberg, Gail S. ‘Ruskin, Pater and the Rediscovery of Botticelli.’ The Burlington Magazine 129.1006 (1987): 25–27.Google Scholar

Weiss, Timothy. ‘Walter Pater, Aesthetic Utilitarian.’ Victorian Institute Journal 12 (1987): 105–122.Google Scholar

Welleck, René. A History of Modern Criticism: 1750–1950. 4. The Later Nineteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Weltman, Sharon Aronofsky. ‘Introduction: Reinterpreting Ruskin.’ Nineteenth-Century Prose. Special Issue: John Ruskin. 35.1 (2008): 1–12.Google Scholar

Weltman, Sharon Aronofsky. ‘Myth and Gender in Ruskin’s Science.’ Ruskin and the Dawn of the Modern. 153–173.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Michael. Ruskin’s God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wildman, Stephen. A Ruskin Bibliography. Lancaster: The Ruskin Library, 1939–2016. www.lancaster.ac.uk/users/ruskinlib/Pages/bibliog.htmlGoogle Scholar

Williams, Carolyn. Transfigured World: Walter Pater’s Aesthetic Historicism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society 1780–1950. 1958. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. The Long Revolution. 1961. London: Hogarth Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Willsdon, Clare A. P. Mural Painting in Britain 1840–1900: Image and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Winckelmann, Johann Joachim. History of the Art of Antiquity. Intro. Potts, Alex. Trans. Mallgrave, Harry Francis. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2006.Google Scholar

Winter, Emma. ‘German Fresco Painting and the New Houses of Parliament at Westminster, 1834–1851.’ The Historical Journal 47.2 (2004): 291–329.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Wollheim, Richard. ‘Walter Pater: From Philosophy to Art.’ Comparative Criticism: An Annual Journal 17 (1995): 21–40.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William. The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth, Volume 5: The Excursion; The Recluse Part 1, Book 1. Ed. De Selincourt, Ernest and Darbishire, Helen. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Wood, Christopher. The Pre-Raphaelites. London: Seven Dials, 2001.Google Scholar

Wood, Kendall Smaling. ‘George Elgar Hicks’s Woman’s Mission and the Apotheosis of the Domestic.’ Tate Papers No. 22 (11 November 2014).Google Scholar

Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and America 1780–1865. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Woodson-Boulton, Amy. Transformative Beauty: Art Museums in Industrial Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Zangwill, Nick. ‘UnKantian Notions of Disinterest.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 32.2 (1991): 149–152.Google Scholar