Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T05:45:07.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Functional magnetic resonance imaging in psychiatry: where are we now and where are we going?

from Part VI - Imaging the normal and abnormal mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Ed Bullmore
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
Maria A. Ron
Affiliation:
Institute of Neurology, London
Trevor W. Robbins
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

As a technique for measuring changes in oxygenated cerebral blood flow related to local neuronal activity, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is approximately 10 years old. As an instrument of psychiatric research, it is even younger – perhaps 7 years old by the time this book is published.

Already it is clear that fMRI has some outstanding technical advantages compared with previously available methods for functional neuro-imaging, such as positronand single photon-emission tomography (PET and SPET). (For a general introduction to fMRI physics, experimental design and data analysis, see review articles by Bullmore and Suckling (2000, 2001).) First and foremost, it is remarkably safe. There is no requirement for exposure to ionizing radiation or radioisotopes and, at static magnetic field strengths of 3 tesla or less, the only significant health and safety risks are posed by the loud acoustic noise of most scanners (subjects must wear ear-protectors) and by deposition of radiofrequency energy (which limits scanning time in a single session to 45 minutes in some centres). This degree of safety considerably relieves any ethical concerns about scanning patients and usefully favours study designs entailing multiple repeated measures on each subject. The second major advantage of fMRI is that it has superior spatial resolution (in the order of mm) and temporal resolution (in the order of s) compared with any single alternative modality for investigation of living human brain function.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barch, D M, Carter, C S and Braver, T S et al. (2001). Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 58, 280–8Google Scholar
Braver, T S, Cohen, J D, Nystrom, L E, Jonides, J, Smith, E E and Noll, D C (1997). A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage, 5, 49–62Google Scholar
Bullmore E T and Suckling J (2000). Functional MRI. In The New Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, ed. M Gelder, N C Andreasen and J Lopez-Ibor, Vol. 1, pp. 218–23. New York: Oxford University Press
Bullmore, E T and Suckling, J (2001). Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Int Rev Psychiatry, 13, 24–33Google Scholar
Bullmore, E T, Rabe-Hesketh, S, Morris, R G et al. (1996). Functional magnetic resonance image analysis of a large-scale neurocognitive network. Neuroimage, 4, 16–33Google Scholar
Bullmore, E T, Frangou, S and Murray, R M (1997). The dysplastic net hypothesis: an integration of developmental and dysconnectionist theories of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res, 28, 143–56Google Scholar
Bullmore, E T, Brammer, M J, Rabe-Hesketh, S et al. (1999 a). Methods for diagnosis and treatment of stimulus correlated motion in generic brain activation studies using fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp, 7, 38–48Google Scholar
Bullmore, E T, Brammer, M J, Williams, S C R et al. (1999 b). Functional MR imaging of confounded hypofrontality. Hum Brain Mapp, 8, 86–91Google Scholar
Bullmore, E T, Horwitz, B, Honey, G D, Brammer, M J, Williams, S C R and Sharma, T (2000). How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data?Neuroimage, 11, 289–301Google Scholar
Bullmore, E T, Long, C and Suckling, J et al. (2001). Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: resampling methods in the time and wavelet domains. Hum Brain Mapp, 12, 61–78Google Scholar
Callicott, J H, Mattay, V S and Bertolino, A et al. (1999). Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. Cereb Cortex, 9, 20–6Google Scholar
Callicott, J H, Bertolino, A, Mattay, V S et al. (2000). Physiological dysfunction of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia revisited. Cereb Cortex, 10, 1078–92Google Scholar
Curtis, V A, Bullmore, E T and Wright, I C et al. (1997). Attenuated frontal activation during verbal fluency in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 155, 1056–63Google Scholar
David, A S, Woodruff, P W R, Howard, R et al. (1996). Auditory hallucinations inhibit exogenous activation of auditory cortex. Neuroreport, 7, 932–6Google Scholar
Duncan, J and Owen, A M (2000). Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci, 23, 475–83Google Scholar
Egan, M F, Goldberg, T E and Kolachana, B S et al. (2001). Effect of COMT Val (108/158) Met genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98, 6917–22Google Scholar
Fletcher, P C, McKenna, P J, Frith, C D, Grasby, P M, Friston, K J and Dolan, R J (1998). Brain activations in schizophrenia during a graded-memory task studied with functional neuroimaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 55, 1001–8Google Scholar
Friston, K J, Zarahn, E, Josephs, O, Henson, R N A and Dale, A M (1999). Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 10, 607–19Google Scholar
Frith, C D (1996). The role of the prefrontal cortex in self-consciousness: the case of auditory hallucinations. Philos Trans R Soc B, 351, 1505–12Google Scholar
Furey, M, Pietrini, P and Haxby, J V (2000). Cholinergic enhancement and increased selectivity of perceptual processing during working memory. Science, 290, 2315–19Google Scholar
Genovese, C R (2000). A Bayesian time-course model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data. J Am Stat Assoc, 95, 691–703Google Scholar
Halligan, P W and David, A S (2001). Cognitive neuropsychiatry: towards a scientific psychopathology. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2, 209–15Google Scholar
Handy, T C (2001). Capacity theory as a model of cortical behavior. J Cogn Neurosci, 12, 1066–9Google Scholar
Honey, G D, Bullmore, E T, Soni, W, Varatheesan, M, Williams, S C R and Sharma, T (1999). Differences in frontal cortical activation by a working memory task following substitution of risperidone for typical antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenic patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96, 13432–7Google Scholar
Kircher, T T J, Liddle, P F, Brammer, M J, Williams, S C R, Murray, R M and McGuire, P K (2001). Neural correlates of formal thought disorder in schizophrenia – preliminary findings from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 58, 769–74Google Scholar
Koslow, S (2000). Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data?Nat Neurosci, 3, 863–5Google Scholar
Kwon, H, Menon, V and Eliez, S et al. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of visuospatial working memory in fragile X syndrome: relation to behavioral and molecular measures. Am J Psychiatry, 158, 1040–51Google Scholar
Leslie, R A and James, M F (2000). Pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging: a new application for functional MRI. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 21, 314–18Google Scholar
Logothetis, N K, Pauls, J, Augath, M, Trinath, T and Oeltermann, A (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150–7Google Scholar
Manoach, D S, Gollub, R L and Benson, E S et al. (2000). Schizophrenic subjects show aberrant fMRI activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia during working memory performance. Biol Psychiatry, 48, 99–109Google Scholar
Mattay, V S, Callicott, J H and Bertolino, A et al. (2000). Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. Neuroimage, 12, 268–75Google Scholar
Menon, V, Anagnoson, R T, Glover, G H and Pfefferbaum, A (2001 a). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for disrupted basal ganglia function in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 158, 646–9Google Scholar
Menon, V, Anagnoson, R T, Mathalon, D H, Glover, G H and Pfefferbaum, A (2001 b). Functional neuroanatomy of auditory working memory in schizophrenia: relation to positive and negative symptoms. Neuroimage, 13, 433–46Google Scholar
Mesulam M-M (2000). Principles of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurology. New York: Oxford University Press
Nicholls, T E and Holmes, A P (2001). Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp, 15, 1–25Google Scholar
OHBM [Council for Organisation of Human Brain Mapping] (2001). Neuroimaging databases. Science, 292, 1673–6; see also http://www.humanbrainmapping.org
Perlstein, W M, Carter, C S, Noll, D C and Cohen, J D. (2001). Relation of prefrontal cortex dysfunction to working memory and symptoms in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry, 158, 1105–13Google Scholar
Phillips, M L, Marks, I M and Senior, C et al. (2000). A differential neural response in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients with washing compared with checking symptoms to disgust. Psychol Med, 30, 1037–50Google Scholar
Rao, S M, Salmeron, B J and Durgerian, S et al. (2000). Effects of methylphenidate on functional MRI blood oxygen level dependent contrast. Am J Psychiatry, 157, 1697–9Google Scholar
Ridler, K, Bullmore, E T, Vries, P J et al. (2001). Widespread anatomical abnormalities of grey and white matter in tuberous sclerosis. Psychol Med, 31, 1437–46Google Scholar
Ring, H A, Baron-Cohen, S, Wheelwright, S et al. (1999). Cerebral correlates of preserved cognitive skills in autism: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of embedded figures task performance. Brain, 122, 1305–15Google Scholar
Rubia, K, Overmeyer, S and Taylor, E et al. (1999). Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher order motor control: a study with functional MRI. Am J Psychiatry, 156, 891–6Google Scholar
Rubia, K, Overmeyer, S and Taylor, E et al. (2000). Functional frontalisation with age: mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 24, 13–19Google Scholar
Shergill, S S, Bullmore, E T, Simmons, A, Murray, R M and McGuire, P K (2000). The functional anatomy of auditory-verbal imagery in patients with auditory hallucinations. Am J Psychiatry, 157, 1691–3Google Scholar
Sternberg, S (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychologica, 106, 147–246Google Scholar
Vaidya, C J, Austin, G and Kirkorian, G et al. (1998). Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 95, 14494–9Google Scholar
Amelsvoort, T, Daly, E, Robertson, D et al. (2001). Structural brain abnormalities associated with deletion at chromosome 22q11 – quantitative neuroimaging study of adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome. Br J Psychiatry, 178, 412–19Google Scholar
Weinberger, D R and Berman, K F (1996). Prefrontal function in schizophrenia: confounds and controversies. Phil Trans R Soc B, 351, 1495–503Google Scholar
Werring, D J, Clark, C A and Barker, G J et al. (1998). The structural and functional mechanisms of motor recovery: complementary use of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging in a traumatic injury of the internal capsule. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 65, 863–9Google Scholar
Wright, I C, Rabe-Hesketh, S, Woodruff, P W R, David, A S, Murray, R M and Bullmore, E T (2000). Regional brain structure in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of volumetric MRI studies. Am J Psychiatry, 157, 16–25Google Scholar
Yurgelun-Todd, D A, Gruber, S A, Kanayam, G, Killgore, W D S, Baird, A A and Young, A D. (2000). fMRI during affect discrimination in bipolar affective disorder. Bipolar Disord, 2, 237–48Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×