Adrian, Gregory, The Silence of Memory: Armistice Day 1919–1945 (Oxford: Berg, 1994).Google Scholar

Agnew, Jean-Christophe, Worlds Apart: The Market and the Theater in Anglo-American Thought, 1550–1750 (Cambridge University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althusser, Louis, ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatuses [1968]’, in Rivkin, J. and Ryan, M. (eds.), Literary Theory: An Anthology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 294–304.Google Scholar

Altman, Joel B., ‘“Vile participation”: The amplification of violence in the theater of Henry V’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 42:1 (1991), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edition (London and New York: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar

Anderson, Thomas P., Performing Early Modern Trauma from Shakespeare to Milton (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida, Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida, ‘Formen des Vergessens’, in Diasio, N. and Wieland, K. (eds.), Die sozio-kulturelle (De-)Konstruktion des Vergessens: Bruch und Kontinuität in den Gedächtnisrahmen um 1945 und 1989 (Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, 2012), pp. 21–48.Google Scholar

Assmann, Aleida, ‘The battle of memories in Shakespeare’s histories’, in Assmann, A., Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assmann, Jan, Das kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen (München: Beck, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Francis, Of the Advancement and Proficiencies of Learning … (London: 1640).Google Scholar

Baldo, Jonathan, ‘“A rooted sorrow”: Scotland’s unusable past’, in Moschovakis, N. (ed.), Macbeth: New Critical Essays (London and New York: Routledge, 2008), pp. 88–103.Google Scholar

Baldo, Jonathan, ‘Exporting oblivion in The Tempest’, Modern Language Quarterly, 56:2 (1995), 111–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldo, Jonathan, ‘Forgetting Elizabeth in Henry VIII’, in Hageman, E. and Conway, K. (eds.), Resurrecting Elizabeth I in Seventeenth-Century England (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2007), pp. 132–48.Google Scholar

Baldo, Jonathan, Memory in Shakespeare’s Histories: Stages of Forgetting in Early Modern England (New York: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar

Baldo, Jonathan, ‘Shakespeare’s art of distraction’, Shakespeare, 10:2 (2014), 138–57.Google Scholar

Baldo, Jonathan, ‘Wars of memory in Henry V’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 47:2 (1996), 132–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, C. L., Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and Its Relation to Social Custom (Princeton University Press, 1959).Google Scholar

Barish, Jonas, ‘Remembering and forgetting in Shakespeare’, in Parker, R. B. and Zitner, S. P. (eds.), Elizabethan Theater (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996), pp. 214–12.Google Scholar

Barish, Jonas, The Antitheatrical Prejudice (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Batman, Stephen, Batman Uppon Bartholome (London: Thomas East, 1582).Google Scholar

Bawcutt, Nancy W., The Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels 1623–1672 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Beecher, Donald, ‘Introduction: The crisis of memory’, in Beecher, D. and Williams, G. (eds.), Ars Reminiscendi: Mind and Memory in Renaissance Culture (Toronto: Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies, 2009), pp. 17–24.Google Scholar

Bevington, David, ‘Introduction’, in Bevington, D. (ed.), King Henry IV, Part One. The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 1–110.Google Scholar

Bliss, Lee, ‘The wheel of fortune and the maiden phoenix in Shakespeare’s King Henry the Eighth’, English Literary History, 42 (1975), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolzoni, Lina, The Gallery of Memory: Literary and Iconographic Models in the Age of the Printing Press. Transl. by Parzen, Jeremy (University of Toronto Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boym, Svetlana, The Future of Nostalgia (New York: Basic Books, 2001).Google Scholar

Breuilly, John, Nationalism and the State (Manchester University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Bruster, Douglas, Drama and the Market in the Age of Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahill, Patricia, Unto the Breach: Martial Formations, Historical Trauma, and the Early Modern Stage (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calhoun, Craig, Nationalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Carlson, Marvin, The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine (University of Michigan Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Carroll, William C., ‘“The form of law”: Ritual and succession in Richard III’, in Woodbridge, L. (ed.), True Rites and Maimed Rites: Ritual and Anti-Ritual in Shakespeare and His Age (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1992), pp. 203–19.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Mary, The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture. 2^nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavanagh, Dermot, Hampton-Reeves, Stuart and Longstaffe, Stephen (eds.), Shakespeare’s Histories and Counter-Histories (Manchester University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Chapman, Alison, ‘Whose Saint Crispin’s Day is it? Shoemaking, holiday making, and the politics of memory in early modern England’, Renaissance Quarterly, 54:4 (2001), 1467–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charnes, Linda, Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Chartier, Roger, ‘Jack Cade, the skin of a dead lamb, and the hatred for writing’, Shakespeare Studies, 34 (2006), 77–89.Google Scholar

Chernaik, Warren, The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare’s History Plays (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Clare, Janet, ‘Art Made Tongue Tied by Authority’: Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship (Manchester University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Clegg, Cyndia Susan, Press Censorship in Elizabethan England (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Derek, Searching Shakespeare: Studies in Culture and Authority (University of Toronto Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Stephen, ‘Between form and culture: New Historicism and the promise of a historical formalism’, in Rasmussen, M. D. (ed. and introd.) and Strier, R. (afterword), Renaissance Literature and Its Formal Engagements (New York, NY: Palgrave, 2002), pp. 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Stephen (ed.), Shakespeare and Historical Formalism (Aldershot:Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar

Collinson, Patrick, ‘William Camden and the anti-myth of Elizabeth: Setting the mould?’, in Doran, S. and Freeman, T. S. (eds.), The Myth of Elizabeth (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connerton, Paul, How Societies Remember (Cambridge University Press,1989).Google Scholar

Connerton, Paul, ‘Seven types of forgetting’, Memory Studies, 1:1 (2008), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corbin, Peter and Sedge, Douglas (eds.), The Oldcastle Controversy: Sir John Oldcastle, Part I and The Famous Victories of Henry V (Manchester University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Craik, T. W., ‘Introduction’, in King Henry V, ed. by Craik, T. W.. Arden Third Series (London and New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 1–111.Google Scholar

Davis, Fred, Yearning for Yesterday: A Sociology of Nostalgia (New York: The Free Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Dawson, Anthony B., ‘The arithmetic of memory: Shakespeare’s theatre and the national past’, Shakespeare Survey, 52 (1999), 54–67.Google Scholar

Dawson, Anthony B., ‘The distracted globe’, in Dawson, A. B. and Yachnin, P. (eds.), The Culture of Playgoing in Shakespeare’s England: A Collaborative Debate (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 88–107.Google Scholar

Dawson, Anthony B. and Yachnin, Paul, The Culture of Playgoing in Shakespeare’s England: A Collaborative Debate (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Day, Gillian, ‘“Determinèd to prove a villain”: Theatricality in Richard III’, Critical Survey, 3:2 (1991), 149–56.Google Scholar

de Sousa, Geraldo U., ‘The peasants’ revolt and the writing of history in 2 Henry VI’, in Bergeron, D. (ed.), Reading and Writing in Shakespeare (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1996), pp. 178–93.Google Scholar

Debord, Guy, The Society of Spectacle [1967]. Transl. by Nicholson-Smith, Donald (New York: Zone Books, 1994).Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas, The Whore of Babylon [1607], in The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker, vol. II, ed. by Bowers, Fredson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955).Google Scholar

Diehl, Huston, Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theatre in Early Modern England (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dillon, Janette, Shakespeare and the Staging of English History (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Dobson, Michael and Watson, Nicola, England’s Elizabeth: An Afterlife in Fame and Fantasy (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Dobson, R.B., The Peasant’s Revolt of 1381. 2^nd edn. (London: Macmillan Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doran, Susan and Freeman, Thomas S., The Myth of Elizabeth (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Döring, Tobias, Performances of Mourning in Shakespearean Theatre and Early Modern Culture (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Döring, Tobias, ‘Shadows to the unseen grief? Rituals of memory and forgetting in the history plays’, paper given at the International Shakespeare Conference, Brisbane, July 2006, Panel Session Cultural Memory in Shakespeare – Shakespeare in Cultural Memory. Unpublished lecture manuscript.Google Scholar

Downame, John, The Second Part of the Christian Warfare (London: 1611).Google Scholar

Dubrow, Heather, ‘Guess who’s coming to dinner? Reinterpreting formalism and the country house poem’, Modern Language Quarterly, 61:1 (2000), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubrow, Heather. A Happier Eden: The Politics of Marriage in the Stuart Epithalamium (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Duffy, Eamon, The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England, c. 1400 – c. 1580 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Dutton, Richard, Licensing, Censorship and Authorship in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutton, Richard, Mastering the Revels: The Regulation and Censorship of English Renaissance Drama (London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991).Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto, ‘An ars oblivionalis? Forget it!’, PMLA, 103:3 (1988), 254–61.Google Scholar

Engel, William, Death and Drama in Renaissance England (Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, William E., ‘The decay of memory’, in Ivic, C. and Williams, G. (eds.), Forgetting in Early Modern English Literature and Culture: Lethe’s Legacies (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar

Engel, William E., Mapping Mortality: The Persistence of Memory and Melancholy in Early Modern England (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Engle, Lars, ‘Who pays in the Henriad?’, in Engle, L., Shakespearean Pragmatism: Market of His Time (University of Chicago Press, 1993), pp. 107–28.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas, Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Fischer, Sandra K., ‘“He means to pay”: Value and metaphor in the Lancastrian tetralogy’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 40:2 (1989), 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitter, Chris, ‘Historicising Shakespeare’s Richard II: Current events, dating, and the sabotage of Essex’, Early Modern Literary Studies: A Journal of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century English Literature, 11:2 (2005), http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/11–2/fittric2.htm, last accessed 13.02.2015, no pagination.Google Scholar

Fitter, Chris, ‘“Your captain is brave and vows reformation”: Jack Cade, the Hacket Rising, and Shakespeare’s vision of popular rebellion in 2 Henry VI’, Shakespeare Studies, 32 (2004), 173–219.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Joan, Food in Shakespeare: Early Modern Dietaries and the Plays (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar

Foakes, R. A., ‘Review of Wells, Stanley; Taylor, Gary. The Complete Works, original-spelling edition’, Modern Language Review, 84:2 (1989), 438–9.Google Scholar

Fraser, R. Scott, ‘“The king has killed his heart”: The death of Falstaff in Henry V’, SEDERI, 20 (2010), 145–57.Google Scholar

Frow, John, Genre. New Critical Idiom Series (New York: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Frow, John, ‘Toute la mémoire du monde: Repetition and forgetting’, in Frow, J., Time and Commodity Culture: Essays in Cultural Theory and Postmodernity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997), pp. 218–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, Marjorie, Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality (New York and London, Methuen: 1987).Google Scholar

Gasper, Julia, The Dragon and the Dove: The Plays of Thomas Dekker (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan, ‘The commodity of names: “Falstaff” and “Oldcastle” in 1 Henry IV’, in Crewe, J. (ed.), Reconfiguring the Renaissance: Essays in Critical Materialism (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press; London and Toronto: Associated University Press, 1992), pp. 76–88.Google Scholar

Goldmann, Stefan, ‘Statt Totenklage Gedächtnis: Zur Erfindung der Mnemotechnik durch Simonides von Keos’, Poetica, 21 (1989), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodland, Katherine, Female Mourning in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).Google Scholar

Gosson, Stephen, ‘Playes Confuted in Five Actions [1582]’, in Markets of Bawdrie: The Dramatic Criticism of Stephen Gosson, ed. by Kinney, Arthur F. (Salzburg: Institut für Englische Sprache und Literatur, 1974), pp. 138–200.Google Scholar

Gosson, Stephen, ‘The School of Abuse [1587]’, in Markets of Bawdrie: The Dramatic Criticism of Stephen Gosson, ed. by Kinney, Arthur F. (Salzburg: Institut für Englische Sprache und Literatur, 1974), pp. 69–120.Google Scholar

Grady, Hugh, ‘Falstaff: Subjectivity between the carnival and the aesthetic’, The Modern Language Review, 96 (2001), 609–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, Hugh, Shakespeare and Impure Aesthetics (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, Hugh, Shakespeare, Machiavelli and Montaigne: Power and Subjectivity from Richard II to Hamlet (Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, Teresa, ‘Drama queen: Staging Elizabeth in If You Know Not Me You Know Nobody’, in Doran, S. and Freeman, T. S. (eds.), The Myth of Elizabeth (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), pp. 120–42.Google Scholar

Grant, Teresa, ‘History in the making: The case of Samuel Rowley’s When You See Me You Know Me (1605/06)’, in Grant, T. and Ravelhofer, B. (eds.), English Historical Drama, 1500–1660: Forms Outside the Canon (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 125–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gratarolus, Gulielmus, The Castel of Memorie. Transl. by Fulwood, William. London: Rouland Hall, 1562.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, Hamlet in Purgatory (Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, ‘Murdering peasants: Status, genre, and the representation of rebellion’, Representations, 1 (1983), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Greene, John [see also I. G.], A Refutation of the Apology for Actors (London: W. White, 1615).Google Scholar

Grene, Nicolas, Shakespeare’s Serial History Plays (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew, ‘Introduction’, in Richard II, ed. by Gurr, A.. The New Cambridge Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 1–60.Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespeare Company, 1594–1642 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Hadfield, Andrew, Literature, Politics and National Identity: Reformation to Renaissance (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hageman, Elizabeth H. and Conway, Katherine (eds.), Resurrecting Elizabeth I in Seventeenth-Century England (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Haigh, Christopher, English Reformations: Religion, Society and Politics under the Tudors (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Halbwachs, Maurice, Les Cadres Sociaux de la Mémoire (Paris: Libraire Félix Alcan, 1925).Google Scholar

Hall, Edward, The Union of the Two Noble Houses of Lancaster and York (London, 1550).Google Scholar

Hammer, Paul, ‘Shakespeare’s Richard II, the play of 7 February 1601, and the Essex Rising’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 59:1 (2008), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampton-Reeves, Stuart, ‘Staring at Clio: artists, histories and counter-histories’, in Cavanagh, D., Hampton-Reeves, S. and Longstaffe, S. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Histories and Counter-Histories (Manchester University Press, 2006), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Harmon, A. G., ‘Shakespeare’s carved saints’, Studies in English Literature, 45:2 (2005), 315–31.Google Scholar

Harris, Jonathan Gil, Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Hattaway, Michael, ‘The Shakespearean history play’, in Hattaway, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helgerson, Richard, Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hertel, Ralf, Staging England in the Elizabethan History Play: Performing National Identity (Farnham: Ashgate, 2014).Google Scholar

Heywood, Thomas, ‘An Apology for Actors [1612]’, English Renaissance Literary Criticism, ed. by Vickers, Brian (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999), pp. 474–501.Google Scholar

Heywood, Thomas, If You Know Not Me You Know Nobody, Parts I and II [1605]. 2 vols., ed. by Gregg, W. W. (Oxford: The Malone Society Reprints, 1934).Google Scholar

Higden, Ranulf, Polycronycon (Westminster: Printed by William Caxton, 1482).Google Scholar

Hillman, David, ‘Homo clausus at the theatre’, in Reynolds, B. and West, W. N. (eds.), Rematerializing Shakespeare Authority and Representation on the Early Modern English Stage (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 161–85.Google Scholar

Hiscock, Andrew, Reading Memory in Early Modern Literature (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobgood, Allison P. Passionate Playgoing in Early Modern England (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Höfele, Andreas, ‘Making history memorable: More, Shakespeare and Richard III’, REAL: The Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature, 21 (2005), 187–203.Google Scholar

Holderness, Graham, Shakespeare: The Histories (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000).Google Scholar

Holderness, Graham, Shakespeare’s History (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1985).Google Scholar

Holinshed, Raphael, Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland [1586], ed. by Snow, Vernon F.. 6 vols. (New York: AMS Press, 1976) [= facsimile reprint of the 1807–8 edition printed for J. Johnson, London.]Google Scholar

Holland, Peter, ‘On the gravy train: Shakespeare, memory and forgetting’, in Holland, P. (ed.), Shakespeare, Memory, and Performance (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 207–34.Google Scholar

Howard, Jean E., ‘Shakespeare, geography, and the work of genre’, in Cohen, S. (ed.), Shakespeare and Historical Formalism (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 49–67.Google Scholar

Howard, Jean and Rackin, Phyllis, Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare’s English Histories (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda, ‘Irony, nostalgia, and the postmodern’ (1998), www. library.utoronto.ca/utel/criticism/hutchinp.html#N26, last accessed 15.02.2015, no pagination.Google Scholar

I[ohn] G[reene], I. G., A Refutation of the Apologie for Actors [1615], ed. by Perkinson, Richard H. (New York: Scholar’s Facsimiles and Prints, 1941).Google Scholar

Ivic, Christopher, ‘Reassuring fratricide in 1 Henry IV’, in Ivic, C. and Williams, G. (eds.), Forgetting in Early Modern English Literature and Culture: Lethe’s Legacies (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivic, Christopher and Williams, Grant (eds.), Forgetting in Early Modern English Literature and Culture: Lethe’s Legacies (London and New York: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, I., The Political Works of James I. Introd. by McIlwain, Charles Howard (New York: Russell & Russell, 1965).Google Scholar

Joughin, John J., ‘Shakespeare’s memorial aesthetics’, in Holland, P. (ed.), Shakespeare, Memory and Performance (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar

Joughin, John J. and Malpas, Simon (eds.), The New Aestheticism (Manchester University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jowett, John, ‘Introduction’, in The Tragedy of King Richard III, ed. by Jowett, J.. The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 1–132.Google Scholar

Kamps, Ivo, Historiography and Ideology in Stuart Drama (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kerrigan, John, Motives of Woe: Shakespeare and ‘Female Complaint’ (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Kerrigan, John, Revenge Tragedy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina, ‘The Elizabethan history play: A true genre?’, in Dutton, R. and Howard, J. E. (eds.), A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, vol. II: The Histories (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), pp. 170–93.Google Scholar

Kewes, Paulina (ed.), The Uses of History in Early Modern England (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Kinney, Daniel, ‘The tyrant being slain: Afterlives of More’s History of King Richard III’, in Rhodes, N. (ed.), English Renaissance Prose: History, Language, and Politics (Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, 1997), pp. 35–56.Google Scholar

Knowles, Ronald, ‘Introduction’, in King Henry VI, Part Two, ed. by Knowles, R.. Arden Shakespeare Third Series (London: Cengage, 1999), pp. 1–141.Google Scholar

Knowles, Ronald, Shakespeare’s Arguments with History (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krämer, Sybille, ‘Das Vergessen nicht vergessen! oder: Ist das Vergessen ein defizienter Modus von Erinnerung?’, Paragrana, 9:2 (2000), 251–75.Google Scholar

Lachmann, Renate, ‘Kultursemiotischer Prospekt’, in Haverkamp, A. and Lachmann, R. (eds.), Memoria: Vergessen und Erinnern (München: Fink, 1993), pp. xvii–xxvii.Google Scholar

Laroque, François, ‘Shakepeare’s “Battle of Carnival and Lent”: The Falstaff scenes reconsidered’, in Knowles, R. (ed.), Shakespeare and Carnival: After Bakhtin (New York: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leahy, William, ‘“All would be royal”: The effacement of disunity in Shakespeare’s Henry V’, Shakespeare-Jahrbuch, 138 (2002), 89–98.Google Scholar

Lees-Jeffries, Hester, Shakespeare and Memory. Oxford Shakespeare Topics (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Leggatt, Alexander, ‘Killing the hero: Tamburlaine and Falstaff’, in Budra, P. and Schellenberg, B. (eds.), Part Two: Reflections on the Sequel (University of Toronto Press, 1998), pp. 53–67.Google Scholar

Leggatt, Alexander, Shakespeare’s Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays (London and New York: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar

Levy, Fritz J., Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Liebler, Naomi C., ‘The mockery King of Snow: Richard II and the sacrifice of ritual’, in Woodbridge, L. and Berry, E. (eds.), True Rites and Maimed Rites: Ritual and Anti-Ritual in Shakespeare and His Age (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1992), pp. 220–39.Google Scholar

Linton, David, ‘Shakespeare as media critic: Communication theory and historiography’, Mosaic, 29:2 (1996), 1–21.Google Scholar

Long, Zachariah, ‘“Unless you could teach me to forget”: Spectatorship, self-forgetting, and subversion in antitheatrical literature and As You Like It’, in Ivic, C. and Williams, G. (eds.), Forgetting in Early Modern English Literature and Culture: Lethe’s Legacies (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 151–64.Google Scholar

Lopez, Jeremy, Theatrical Convention and Audience Response in Early Modern Drama (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Low, Jennifer A. and Myhill, Nova, Imagining the Audience in Early Modern Drama, 1558–1642 (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenthal, David, ‘Nostalgia tells it like it wasn’t’, in Shaw, C. and Chase, M. (eds.), The Imagined Past (Manchester University Press, 1989), pp.18–32.Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David, The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Lowenthal, David, ‘Preface’, in Forty, A. and Küchler, S. (eds.), The Art of Forgetting (Oxford and New York: Berg Publishers, 1999), pp. xi–xiii.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò, The Prince, ed. by Bull, G. (London: Penguin, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marche, Stephen, ‘Mocking dead bones: Historical memory and the theater of the dead in Richard III’, Comparative Drama, 37:1 (2003), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, Peter, Beliefs and the Dead in Reformation England (Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, Pamela, ‘Henry V: “the quick forge and working house of thought”’, in Hattaway, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 177–93.Google Scholar

Maus, Katharine Eisaman, Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance (University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Mazzola, Elizabeth, The Pathology of the English Renaissance: Sacred Remains and Holy Ghosts (Leiden: Brill, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullan, Gordon, ‘Introduction’, in King Henry VIII, ed. by McMullan, G.. Arden Shakespeare Third Series (London: Cengage, 2000), pp. 1–199.Google Scholar

Meek, Richard, Rickard, Jane and Wilson, Richard (eds.), Shakespeare’s Book: Essays in Reading, Writing and Reception (Manchester University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Melchiori, Giorgio, ‘Dying of a sweat: Falstaff and Oldcastle’, Notes and Queries, 34 (1987), 210–11.Google ScholarPubMed

Melchiori, Giorgio (ed.), ‘Introduction’, in The Second Part of King Henry IV. New Cambridge Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 1–73.Google Scholar

Montrose, Louis, The Subject of Elizabeth: Authority, Gender and Representation (University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar

More, Thomas, The Complete Works of St. Thomas More. ed. by Sylvester, Richard S. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Muir, Edward, Ritual in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Mullaney, Steven, The Place of the Stage: License, Power and Play in Renaissance England (University of Chicago Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Muro, Diego, ‘Nationalism and nostalgia’, Nations and Nationalism, 11:4 (2005), 571–89.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nashe, Thomas, Pierce Pennilesse, his Supplication to the Divell, ed. by Harrison, G. B. (Edinburgh University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Neill, Michael, Issues of Death: Mortality and Identity in English Renaissance Tragedy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Northbrooke, John, A Treatise wherein Dicing, Dauncing, Vaine Playes or Enterluds … are Reproved (London: H. Bynneman for George Byshop, 1577).Google Scholar

Orgel, Stephen, ‘The play of conscience’, in Sedgwick, E. Kosofsky and Parker, A. (eds.), Performativity and Performance (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 133–51.Google Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin, Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art (New York: Harper & Row, 1972).Google Scholar

Passerini, Luisa, ‘Memories between silence and oblivion’, in Hodgkin, K. and Radstone, S. (eds.), Memory, History, Nation: Contested Pasts (New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction Publishers, 2006), pp. 238–54.Google Scholar

Paster, Gail Kern, ‘Melancholy cats, lugged bears, and early modern cosmology: Reading Shakespeare’s psychological materialism across the species barrier’, in Paster, G. K., Rowe, K. and Floyd-Wilson, M. (eds.), Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), pp. 113–29.Google Scholar

Patterson, Annabel, Censorship and Interpretation: The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Patterson, Annabel, ‘Sir John Oldcastle as symbol of Reformation historiography’, in Hamilton, D. B. and Strier, R. (eds.), Religion, Literature and Politics in Post-Reformation England, 1540–1688 (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pendleton, Thomas A., ‘“This is not the man”: On calling Falstaff Falstaff’, Analytical and Enumerative Bibliography, 4 (1990), 59–71.Google Scholar

Perry, Curtis, ‘The citizen politics of nostalgia: Queen Elizabeth in early Jacobean London’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 23.1 (1993), 89–111.Google Scholar

Pfister, Manfred, Das Drama, utb 580 (München: Fink, 1977).Google Scholar

Pfister, Manfred, ‘Shakespeare’s memory: Texts – images – monuments – performances’, in Kamm, J. and Lenz, B. (eds.), Shakespearean Culture – Cultural Shakespeare (Passau: Stutz, 2009), pp. 217–40.Google Scholar

Philippy, Patricia, Women, Death and Literature in Post-Reformation England (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Plato, , Collected Dialogues, ed. by Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

Platter, Thomas, Travels in England [1599], ed. by Williams, C. (London: n.pub., 1937).Google Scholar

Pollard, A. F., ‘The making of Sir Thomas More’s Richard III’, in Sylvester, R. S. and Marc’hadour, G. P. (eds.), Essential Articles for the Study of Thomas More (Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1977), pp. 421–33.Google Scholar

Poole, Adrian, ‘Laughter, forgetting and Shakespeare’, in Cordner, M., Holland, P. and Kerrigan, J. (eds.), English Comedy (Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 85–99.Google Scholar

Poole, Kristen, ‘Saints Alive! Falstaff, Martin Marprelate, and the staging of Puritanism’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 46:1 (1995), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pugliatti, Paola, ‘“More than history can pattern”: The Jack Cade rebellion in Shakespeare’s Henry VI, 2’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 22:3 (1992), 451–71.Google Scholar

Pugliatti, Paola, Shakespeare the Historian (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabkin, Norman B., Shakespeare and the Problem of Meaning (University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Rackin, Phyllis, Stages of History: Shakespeare’s English Chronicles (London and New York: Routledge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ralegh, Walter, The Works of Sir Walter Ralegh. Vols. II–VII: The History of the World [1614] (New York: Burt Franklin, 1965) [= reprint of the facsimile edition of the 1829 Works, Oxford University Press].Google Scholar

Rankins, William, A Mirrour of Monsters (London: I.C. for T.H., 1587).Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Mark David (ed. and introd.) and Strier, Richard (afterword), Renaissance Literature and Its Formal Engagements (New York: Palgrave, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renan, Ernest, ‘What is a nation? [1882]’, in Bhabha, H. (ed.), Nation and Narration (London and New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 8–22.Google Scholar

Richards, Michael, A Time of Silence: Civil War and the Culture of Repression in Franco’s Spain, 1936–1945 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rowley, Samuel, When You See Me You Know Me [1605], ed. by Wilson, F.P. (Oxford: The Malone Society Reprints, 1952).Google Scholar

Rudnytsky, Peter L., ‘Henry VIII and the deconstruction of history’, Shakespeare Survey, 43 (1991), 43–58.Google Scholar

Ruiter, David, Shakespeare’s Festive History: Feasting, Festivity, Fasting and Lent in the Second Henriad (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003).Google Scholar

Schmidt, Gabriela, ‘“To set some colour vpon ye matter”: Thomas More’s History of King Richard the Third zwischen humanistischer Vergangenheitskonstruktion und autoreflexiver Skepsis’, in Bezner, F. and Mahlke, K. (eds.), Zwischen Wissen und Politik: Archäologie und Genealogie frühneuzeitlicher Vergangenheitskonstruktionen (Heidelberg: Winter, 2011), pp. 161–82.Google Scholar

Schneider, Manfred, ‘Liturgien der Erinnerung, Techniken des Vergessens’, Merkur, 41:2 (1987), 676–86.Google Scholar

Schoenfeldt, Michael C., Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Philip, Literature, Nationalism, and Memory in Early Modern England and Wales (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwyzer, Philip, ‘Shakespeare’s art of reenactment: Henry at Blackfriars, Richard at Rougemont’, in Gordon, A. and Rist, T. (eds.), The Arts of Remembrance in Early Modern England: Memorial Cultures of the Post Reformation (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 179–94.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William, The Norton Shakespeare, ed by Greenblatt, Stephen et al. (New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1997).Google Scholar

Sharpe, Kevin, Reading Revolutions: The Politics of Reading in Early Modern England (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Shaw, Christopher and Chase, Malcolm (eds.), The Imagined Past: History and Nostalgia (Manchester University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Sidney, Sir Philip, The Major Works, ed. by Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Oxford World’s Classics (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Simpson, James, Under the Hammer: Iconoclasm in the Anglo-American Tradition (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Smith, Anthony D., Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Smith, Helen, ‘“A man in print?” Shakespeare and the representation of the press’, in Meek, R., Rickard, J. and Wilson, R. (eds.), Shakespeare’s Book: Essays in Reading, Writing and Reception (Manchester University Press, 2008), pp. 59–78.Google Scholar

Starobinski, Jean, ‘The idea of nostalgia’, Diogenes, 54 (1966), 84–103.Google Scholar

Stern, Tiffany, Making Shakespeare: From Stage to Page (London and New York: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, Frank (ed.), Silence to Light: Japan and the Shadows of War (Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Stow, John, The Annales; or, General Chronicle of England … (London, 1615).Google Scholar

Stow, John, A Survey of London [1603], ed. by Kingsford, Charles Lethbridge, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908).Google Scholar

Strohm, Paul, England’s Empty Throne: Usurpation and the Language of Legitimation, 1399–1422 (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Sullivan, Garrett A. Jr., ‘Lethargic corporeality on and off the early modern stage’, in Ivic, C. and Williams, G. (eds.), Forgetting in Early Modern English Literature and Culture: Lethe’s Legacies (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 41–52.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Garrett A. Memory and Forgetting in English Renaissance Drama: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Webster (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Summit, Jennifer, ‘Reading reformed: Spenser and the problem of the English library’, in Ivic, C. and Williams, G. (eds.), Forgetting in Early Modern English Literature and Culture: Lethe’s Legacies (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 165–78.Google Scholar

Sylvester, Richard S., ‘Introduction’, in The Complete Works of Sir Thomas More, vol. II, ed. by Sylvester, Richard S. (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1963), pp. 1–151.Google Scholar

Takada, Shigeki, ‘The first and second parts of Henry IV: Some thoughts on the origins of Shakespearean gentleness’, in Takahashi, Y. (ed.), Hot Questrists After the English Renaissance (New York: AMS Press, 2000), pp. 183–96.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary, ‘The fortunes of Oldcastle’, Shakespeare Survey, 38 (1985), 85–100.Google Scholar

Taylor, Gary (ed. and introd.), Henry V (Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Tillyard, E. M. W., Shakespeare’s History Plays [1944]. Revised edition (London: Chatto and Windus, 1969).Google Scholar

Tribble, Evelyn, Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walch, Günter, ‘Henry V as working-house of ideology’, Shakespeare Survey, 40 (1987), 63–8.Google Scholar

Walker, Julia, The Elizabeth Icon: 1603–2003 (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walsh, Brian, Shakespeare, the Queen’s Men and the Elizabethan Performance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren-Heys, Rebecca, ‘“[R]emember, with advantages”: Creating memory in Shakespeare’s Henry V’, Journal of the Northern Renaissance, 2:1 (2010), 111–27.Google Scholar

Weimann, Robert, ‘Performance, game, and representation in Richard III’, in Weimann, R. and Bruster, D. (eds.), Shakespeare and the Power of Performance: Stage and Page in the Elizabethan Theatre (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weimann, Robert, Shakespeare und die Tradition des Volkstheaters (Berlin: Henschel Verlag, 1967).Google Scholar

Weinrich, Harald, Lethe: Kunst und Kritik des Vergessens (Munich: Beck, 1997).Google Scholar

West, William N., ‘Intertheatricality’, in Turner, H. S. (ed.), Early Modern Theatricality (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 151–72.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Anne, Memory. Routledge New Critical Idiom (New York: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

Whitney, Charles, ‘Versions of Sir John’, in Whitney, C., Early Responses to Renaissance Drama (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 73–122.Google Scholar

Wilder, Lina Perkins, Shakespeare’s Memory Theatre: Recollection, Properties, and Character (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Wiles, David, Shakespeare’s Clown (Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Raymond, Marxism and Literature (Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Willis, John, Mnemonica; Or, the Art of Memory, Drained out of the Pure Fountains of Art & Nature [Lat. 1618] (London, 1661).Google Scholar

Womack, Peter, ‘Imagining communities: Theatres and the English nation in the sixteenth century’, in Aers, D. (ed.), Culture and History, 1350–1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities and Writing (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1992), pp. 91–145.Google Scholar

Womack, Peter, ‘Henry IV and epic theatre’, in Wood, N. (ed.), Henry IV, Parts One and Two (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995), pp. 126–61.Google Scholar

Womersley, David, ‘Why is Falstaff fat?’, Review of English Studies, 47 (1996), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, Jennifer, The Theatre of Death: The Ritual Management of Royal Funerals in Renaissance England, 1570–1625 (Woodbridge: Boydell, 1997).Google Scholar

Woolf, Daniel, The Social Circulation of the Past: English Historical Culture, 1500–1730 (Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wotton, Henry, The Life and Letters of Sir Henry Wotton, ed. by Smith, Logan Pearsall. 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Yachnin, Paul, ‘The powerless theater’, English Literary Renaissance, 21 (1991), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yates, Frances, The Art of Memory [1966] (London: Pimlico, 1996).Google Scholar