Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T00:21:47.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Pippa Norris
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Driving Democracy
Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work?
, pp. 231 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Houngnikpo, Mathurin C.. 2001. Determinants of Democratization in Africa: A Comparative Study of Benin and Togo. Lanham, MD: University Press of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Diaye, Boubacar, Saine, Abdoulaye, and Houngnikpo, Mathurin. 2005. Not Yet Democracy: West Africa's Slow Farewell to Authoritarianism. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. ‘Consociational democracy.’ World Politics 21: 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2008. Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schneckener, Ulrich. 2002. ‘Making power-sharing work: Lessons from successes and failures in ethnic conflict regulation.’ Journal of Peace Research 39(2): 203–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneckener, Ulrich, and Wolff, Stefan. Eds. 2004. Managing and Settling Ethnic Conflicts: Perspectives on Successes and Failures in Europe, Africa and Asia. London: C. Hurst. On Kosovo
Taylor, Andrew. 2001. ‘Electoral systems and the promotion of ‘consociationalism’ in a multi-ethnic society: The Kosovo Assembly elections of November 2001.’ Electoral Studies 24(3): 435–463.Google Scholar
Andweg, Rudy B.. 2000. ‘Consociational democracy.’ Annual Review of Politics 3: 509–536. For the development of alternative versions of this conceptCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1967. Proporzdemokratie. Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und Osterreich. Tubingen: MohrGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Jurg. 1974. Amicable Agreement versus Majority Rule: Conflict Resolution in Switzerland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Hans. 1974. ‘The consociational democracy theme.’ World Politics 26: 604–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, Kenneth. Ed. 1974. Consociational Democracy: Conflict Accommodation in Segmented Societies. Toronto: McClelland and StewartCrossRef
Armingeon, Klaus. 2002. ‘The effects of negotiation democracy: A comparative analysis.’ European Journal of Political Research 41: 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2002. ‘Negotiation democracy versus consensus democracy: Parallel conclusions and recommendations.’ European Journal of Political Research 41(1): 107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, Wolf and Baechtiger, Andre. 2005. ‘What drives democratization in Asia and Africa?European Journal of Political Research 44: 861–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1975. ‘Review article: Political accommodation and consociational democracy.’ British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 194.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 2002. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Simonsen, S. G.. 2005. ‘Addressing ethnic divisions in post-conflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases.’ Security Dialogue 36(3): 297–318.CrossRef
Brady, Henry and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2002. ‘The end of the transition paradigm.’ Journal of Democracy 13: 5–21CrossRef
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. ‘The rise of illiberal democracy.’ Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. ‘Thinking about hybrid regimes.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. ‘The rise of competitive authoritarianism.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. Ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
Decalo, Samuel. 1997. ‘Benin: First of the new democracies.’ In Clarke, John F. and Gardiner, David E. (Eds.), Political Reform in Francophone Africa, pp. 41–61. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. L.. 2001. ‘Does oil hinder democracy?World Politics 53: 325–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N. and Wantchekon, L.. 2004. ‘Resource wealth and political regimes in Africa.’ Comparative Political Studies 37: 816–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. L.. 2004. ‘How do natural resources influence civil war? Evidence from thirteen cases.’ International Organization 58(1): 35–67.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank
Humphreys, M.. 2005. ‘Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution – uncovering the mechanisms.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 508–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2006. ‘Does lootable wealth breed disorder? A political economy of extraction framework.’ Comparative Political Studies 39(8): 943–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, E. R.. 2005. ‘Are rich countries immune to the resource curse? Evidence from Norway's management of its oil riches.’ Resources Policy 30(2): 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. A., Torvik, R., Verdier, R., and Verdier, T.. 2006. ‘Political foundations of the resource curse.’ Journal of Development Economics 79(2): 447–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlum, H., Moene, K., and Torvik, R.. 2006. ‘Institutions and the resource curse.’ Economic Journal 116(508): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J.. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank
Doyle, Michael W. and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. and Laitin, David D.. 2003. ‘Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war.’ American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Snyder, Jack. 2007. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paris, Roland. 2005. At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank
Doyle, Michael W. and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim. 1996. ‘Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars.’ International Security 20(4): 136–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creevey, Lucy, Ngomo, Paul and Vergroff, Richard. 2005. ‘Party politics and different paths to democratic transitions – a comparison of Benin and Senegal.’ Party Politics 11(4): 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarritt, James R. and Mozaffar, Shaheen. 1999. ‘The specification of ethnic cleavages and ethnopolitical groups for the analysis of democratic competition in contemporary Africa.’ Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 5: 82–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen, Scarritt, James R., and Galaich, Glen. 2003. ‘Electoral institutions, ethnopolitical cleavages, and party systems in Africa's emerging democracies.’ American Political Science Review 97: 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2004. ‘The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi.’ American Political Science Review 98: 4: 529–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2004. ‘Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa.’ American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 849–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 27Google Scholar
Romanelli, Raffaele. 1998. How Did They Become Voters? The History of Franchise in Modern European Representation. Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Hamer, David Allan. 1977. The Politics of Electoral Pressure: A Study of the History of Victorian Reform Agitations. Hassocks: Harvester PressGoogle Scholar
Walton, John K.. 1987. The Second Reform Act. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Piccone, Ted and Youngs, Richard. Eds. 2006. Strategies for Democratic Change: Assessing the Global Response. Washington, DC: Democracy Coalition Project.
Neuman, Edward and Rich, Roland. Eds. 2004. The UN Role in Promoting Democracy: Between Ideals and Reality. New York: UN University Press
Caplan, Richard D.. 2005. International Governance of War-Torn Territories: Rule and Reconstruction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G., Forsythe, David P., and Coate, Roger A.. 2004. United Nations and Changing World Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Craig N.. 2006. The United Nations Development Programme: A Better Way?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 1999. Democracy without Borders: Transnationalisation and Conditionality in New Democracies. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Burnell, Peter. Ed. 2000. Democracy Assistance: International Co-Operation for Democratization. London: Frank Cass
Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2002. ‘With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy.’ American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2002. ‘Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization.’ International Organization 56(3): 515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2004. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Cooper, Andrew F. and Legler, Thomas. 2007. Intervention without Intervening? The OAS Defense and Promotion of Democracy in the Americas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Muravchik, Joshua. 1992. Exporting Democracy. Washington, DC: AEI PressGoogle Scholar
Cox, Michael, Ikenberry, G. John, and Inoguchi, Takashi. Eds. 2000. American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Monten, Jonathan. 2005. ‘The roots of the Bush doctrine: Power, nationalism and democracy promotion in U.S. Strategy.’ International Security 29(4): 112–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Karen Elizabeth. 2003. European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 2007. Aid That Works: Successful Development in Fragile States. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Guilhot, Nicolas. 2005. The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 2001. ‘Aid dependence and the quality of governance.’ Southern Economic Journal 68(2): 310–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 2004. ‘Does foreign aid promote democracy?International Studies Quarterly 48(1): 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Perez-Linan, Anibal, and Seligson, Mitchell A. with Azpuru, Dinorah. 2005. Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building: Results from a Cross-National Quantitative Study. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
Piccone, Ted and Youngs, Richard. Eds. 2006. Strategies for Democratic Change: Assessing the Global Response. Washington, DC: Democracy Coalition Project.
Youngs, Richard. 2002. The European Union and the Promotion of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2004. Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Cingranelli, David L. and Pasquarello, Thomas E.. 1985. ‘Human rights practices and the distribution of U.S. foreign aid to Latin America.’ American Journal of Political Science 29(3): 539–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, James M. and Mitchell, Neil. 1988. ‘Is U.S. aid really linked to human rights in Latin America?American Journal of Political Science 32(1): 231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T. and Beschel, R. P.. 1992. ‘Can the United States promote democracy?Political Science Quarterly 107(1): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey and Lindborg, Christina. 2003. ‘Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2): 356–381Google Scholar
Brinks, D. and Coppedge, Michael. 2006. ‘Diffusion is no illusion: Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy.’ Comparative Political Studies 39(4): 463–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. ‘Diffusion and the international context of democratization.’ International Organization 60: 911–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunch, Valerie and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2006. ‘International diffusion and post-Communist electoral revolutions.’ Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3): 283–304.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lisa. 2006. ‘Searching where the light shines: Studying democratization in the Middle East.’ Annual Review of Political Science 9: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Grugel, Jean. 1999. Democracy without Borders: Transnationalisation and Conditionality in New Democracies. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Burnell, Peter. Ed. 2000. Democracy Assistance: International Co-Operation for Democratization. London: Frank Cass
Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2002. ‘With a little help from my friends? Regional organizations and the consolidation of democracy.’ American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2002. ‘Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization.’ International Organization 56(3): 515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2004. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2005. Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F. and Legler, Thomas. 2007. Intervention without Intervening? The OAS Defense and Promotion of Democracy in the Americas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murray, Rachel. 2005. Human Rights in Africa: From the OAU to the African Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Manby, B.. 2004. ‘The African Union, NEPAD, and human rights: The missing agenda.’ Human Rights Quarterly 26(4): 983–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Tufte, E. R.. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Spolaore, Enrico. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter, Krennerich, Michael, and Thibaut, Bernhard. Eds. 1999. Elections in Africa: A Data Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew. 2005. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA, p. 53.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1989. ‘Why a constitution?’ In Grofman, Bernard and Wittman, Donald (Eds.), The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism. New York: Agathon PressGoogle Scholar
Finer, Sammy. 1995. Comparing Constitutions. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 2005. Self-Enforcing Constitutions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P.. 1991. The Third Wave. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
2004. Arab Human Development Report 2004. New York: UNDP. www.undp.org
Puddington, Arch and Piano, Aili. 2004. ‘The 2004 Freedom House Survey: Worrisome signs, modest shifts.’ Journal of Democracy 16(1): 103–108Google Scholar
Puddington, Arch. 2006. ‘Freedom in the World 2006: Middle East progress amid global gains.’ Journal of Democracy 17(1)Google Scholar
Puddington, Arch. 2007. ‘The pushback against democracy.’ Journal of Democracy 18(2): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukiyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Puddington, Arch. 2007. ‘The pushback against democracy.’ Journal of Democracy 18(2): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monten, Jonathan. 2005. ‘The roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, nationalism, and democracy promotion in U.S. strategy.’ International Security 29(4): 112–156; Thomas Carothers. ‘Promoting democracy and fighting terror.’ Foreign Affairs 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. ‘Thinking about hybrid regimes.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 2007. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, revised ed. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
Howard, Marc M. and Roessler, P. G.. 2006. ‘Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes.’ American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armony, A. C. and Schamis, H. E.. 2005. ‘Babel in democratization studies.’ Journal of Democracy 16(4): 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. ‘What do we know about democratization after twenty years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. and Snyder, Jack. Eds. Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press
Reynolds, Andrew. Ed. 2002. The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef
Guelke, Adrian. Ed. 2004. Democracy and Ethnic Conflict. New York: Palgrave.CrossRef
Dicey, Albert Venn. 1960. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th ed. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1967. Proporzdemokratie: Politisches System und politische Kultur in der Schweiz und Osterreich. Tubingen: MohrGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Jurg. 1974. Amicable Agreement versus Majority Rule: Conflict Resolution in Switzerland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Hans. 1974. ‘The consociational democracy theme.’ World Politics 26: 604–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, Kenneth. Ed. 1974. Consociational Democracy: Conflict Accommodation in Segmented Societies. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.CrossRef
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. ‘Consociational democracy.’ World Politics 21: 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend and Grofman, Bernard. Eds. 1984. Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives. New York: Praeger
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1986. ‘Degrees of proportionality of proportional representation formulas.’ In Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend (Eds.), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1991. ‘Constitutional choices for new democracies.’ Journal of Democracy 2: 72–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1991. ‘Proportional representation: Double checking the evidence.’ Journal of Democracy 2: 42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1995. ‘Electoral systems.’ In Lipset, Seymour Martin (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Democracy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. ‘Constitutional design for divided societies.’ Journal of Democracy 15(2): 96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2008. Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. ‘Consociational democracy.’ World Politics 21: 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, p. 33.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur. 1965. Politics in West Africa. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, chapters 15 and 16.Google Scholar
Bogaards, Matthijs. 2000. ‘The uneasy relationship between empirical and normative types in consociational theory.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 12(4): 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2000. ‘Definitions, evidence and policy: A response to Matthijs Bogaards’ Critique.' Journal of Theoretical Politics 12(4): 425–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel L.. 2002. Keeping the Peace: Lasting Solutions to Ethnic Conflict. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sisk, Timothy D.. 1998. ‘Elections and conflict management in Africa: Conclusions and recommendations.’ In Sisk, Timothy D. and Reynolds, Andrew (Eds.), Elections and Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace PressGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Daniel P.. 2005. ‘The missing pillars: A look at the failure of peace in Burundi through the lens of Arend Lijphart's theory of consociational democracy.’ Journal of Modern African Studies 43(1): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. ‘Constitutional design for divided societies.’ Journal of Democracy 15(2): 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, Wolf and Baechtiger, Andre. 2005. ‘What drives democratization in Asia and Africa?European Journal of Political Research 44: 861–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J.. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N.. 2004. ‘The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi.’ American Political Science Review 98(4): 529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N.. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1993. ‘Democracy in divided societies.’ Journal of Democracy 4: 18–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 2002. ‘Constitutional design: Proposals versus processes.’ In Reynolds, Andrew (Ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 2003. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reilly, Ben and Reynolds, Andrew. 1998. Electoral Systems and Conflict in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, p. 30Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan L.. ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina.’ In Walter, Barbara F. and Snyder, Jack (Eds.), Civil Wars, Insecurity and Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 96.
Snyder, Jack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. Norton, p. 36Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack. 2007. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simonsen, S. G.. 2005. ‘Addressing ethnic divisions in post-conflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases.’ Security Dialogue 36(3): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Ben and Reynolds, Andrew. 1998. Electoral Systems and Conflict in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Ben. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, Brij V.. 2002. ‘Constitutional engineering in post-coup Fiji.’ In Reynolds, Andrew (Ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barkan, Joel D.. 1998. ‘Rethinking the applicability of proportional representation for Africa.’ In Sisk, Timothy D. and Reynolds, Andrew (Eds.), Elections and Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Andre, Lehnert, Matthias, Miller, Bernhard, and Sieberer, Ulrich. 2002. ‘The democratic quality of institutional regimes: A conceptual framework.’ Political Studies 50: 313–331.CrossRef
Zartman, William I.. 1995. Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars 1995–1996. Washington, DC: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Hartzell, Caroline, Hoddie, Matthew, and Rothchild, Donald. 2001. ‘Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables.’ International Organization 55(1): 183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothchild, Donald. 2002. ‘Settlement terms and post-agreement stability.’ In Stedman, Stephen, Rothchild, Donald, and Cousens, Elizabeth (Eds.), Ending Civil Wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne ReinnerGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis. Volume 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Wagner, Robert H.. 1993. ‘The causes of peace.’ In Licklider, Roy (Ed.), Stopping the Killing. New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M.. 2002. ‘Third party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflict.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Philip and Rothschild, Donald. 2005. Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack. 2007. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tull, Denis M. and Mehler, Andreas. 2005. ‘The hidden costs of power-sharing: Reproducing insurgent violence in Africa.’ African Affairs 104: 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shvetsova, Olga. 1999. ‘A survey of post-communist electoral institutions, 1900–1998.’ Electoral Studies 18: 397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Joseph M.. 2004. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Linan, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred and Skach, Cindy. 1993. ‘Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism and presidentialism.’ World Politics 46(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schugart, Mathew Soberg and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo. Eds. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. Eds. 1997. Presidential Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Cheibub, Jose Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Stephen. 2006. ‘Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies.’ Journal of Democracy 17(1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Ronald L.. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems, 2nd ed. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press, p. 3.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Chaim. 1996. ‘Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars.’ International Security 20(4): 136–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. ‘Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism.’ International Organization 60(3): 651–685.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin. 2002. ‘The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1415–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kloti, U.. ‘Consensual government in a heterogeneous polity.’ West European Politics 24(2): 19–25.
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Anna Morawiec. ‘Ethnic but equal: The quest for a new democratic order in Bosnia and Herzegovina.’ Columbia Law Review 103: 2020–2051.
Noel, Sid. Ed. 2005. From Power Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Banducci, Susan A., Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2004. ‘Minority representation, empowerment, and participation.’ Journal of Politics 66(2): 534–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mees, L.. 2001. ‘Between votes and bullets: Conflicting ethnic identities in the Basque Country.’ Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(5): 798–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 1991. A Leap in the Dark: Nationalist Conflict and Federal Reform in Belgium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Curtice, John. Ed. 2002. New Scotland, New Society? Are Social and Political Ties Fragmenting?Edinburgh: Polygon.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew. 2005. Electoral System Design: The New International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
Colomer, Joseph M.. 2004. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matthew. 2005. ‘Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946–2000.’ Electoral Studies 24(2): 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2002. ‘The endogeneity problem in electoral studies: A critical re-examination of Duverger's mechanical effect.’ Electoral Studies 21(1): 35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. ‘Electoral laws as political consequences: Explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions.’ Annual Review of Political Science 10: 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in 21 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics, chapter 3. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, Mahoney, James, and Seawright, Jason. 2004. ‘Claiming too much: Warnings about selection bias.’ In Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David (Eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2000. Peoples versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, DC: US Institute for Peace Press.Google Scholar
Broughton, David and Napel, Hans-Martien ten. Eds. 2000. Religion and Mass Electoral Behavior in Europe. London: Routledge.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 280–282Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein. 1994. ‘Beating the law of minority attrition.’ In Rule, Wilma and Zimmerman, Joseph (Eds.), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood, p. 244.Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma and Zimmerman, Joseph. Eds. 1992. United States Electoral Systems: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. New York: Greenwood Press.
Norris, Pippa. 1985. ‘Women in European legislative elites.’ West European Politics 8(4): 90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1994. ‘Women's under-representation and electoral systems.’ PS: Political Science and Politics 4: 689–692Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2000. ‘Women's representation and electoral systems.’ In Rose, Richard (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Chandler and Grofman, Bernard. Eds. 1994. Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of the Voting Rights Act 1965–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2004. ‘Is gender like ethnicity? The political representation of identity groups.’ Perspectives on Politics 2(3).Google Scholar
Jarstad, Anna. 2001. Changing the Game: Consociational Theory and Ethnic Quotas in Cyprus and New Zealand. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict, Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2005. ‘Reserved seats in national legislatures.’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(2): 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, Charles C.. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Jon M.. ‘Parchment, equilibria, and institutions.’ Comparative Political Studies 33(6–7): 735–761.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2002. ‘The endogeneity problem in electoral studies: A critical re-examination of Duverger's mechanical effect.’ Electoral Studies 21(1): 35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. ‘Electoral laws as political consequences: Explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions.’ Annual Review of Political Science 10: 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Lijphart, Arend. Eds. 2002. The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries. New York: Agathon Press.
Taylor, Bridget, and Thomson, Katarina. Eds. 1999. Scotland and Wales: Nations Again?Cardiff: University of Wales Press
Curtice, John. Ed. 2002. New Scotland, New Society? Are Social and Political Ties Fragmenting?Edinburgh: Polygon.
Gallagher, Michael. 1998. ‘The political impact of electoral system change in Japan and New Zealand, 1996.’ Party Politics 4(2): 203–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Banducci, Susan, and Karp, Jeffrey. 1998. Voters' Victory? New Zealand's First Election under Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Colomer, Joseph M.. 2004. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Joseph M.. 2005. ‘It's parties that chose electoral systems (or, Duverger's Laws upside down).’ Political Studies 53: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1999. ‘Setting the rules of the game: The choice of electoral systems in advanced democracies.’ American Political Science Review 93(3): 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapter 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Roger. 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J.. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Posner, Dan. 2004. ‘The political salience of cultural difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are allies in Zambia and adversaries in Malawi.’ American Political Science Review 98(4): 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, V. P. 1994. ‘Ethnic nationalism and international conflict: The case of Serbia.’ International Security 19(3): 130–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack L.. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: VersoGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. ‘Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism.’ International Organization 60(3): 651–685.Google Scholar
Byman, Daniel L.. 2002. Keeping the Peace: Lasting Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A.. 1985. ‘Regression in time and space: A statistical essay.’ American Journal of Political Science 29: 914–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Cheng M.. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan. 1995. ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data.’ American Political Science Review 89: 634–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan. 1996. ‘Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series cross-sectional models.’ In Freeman, J. (Ed.), Political Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Beck and Katz argue that feasible generalized least squares approaches that estimate the error process with an AR1 model are less accurate and efficient than OLS with panel-corrected standard errors.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sven E. and Butler, David M.. 2007. ‘A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications.’ Political Analysis 15(2): 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsaio, Cheng M.. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan. 1995. ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data.’ American Political Science Review 89: 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in 21 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: The Carnegie FoundationGoogle Scholar
Cheema, G. Shabbir. 2005. Building Democratic Institutions in Developing Countries. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian PressGoogle Scholar
Piccone, Ted and Youngs, Richard. Eds. 2006. Strategies for Democratic Change: Assessing the Global Response. Washington, DC: The Democracy Coalition
Neuman, Edward and Rich, Roland. Eds. 2004. The UN Role in Promoting Democracy: Between Ideals and Reality. New York: UN University Press.
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, Wolf and Bächtiger, André. 2005. ‘What drives democratization in Asia and Africa?European Journal of Political Research 44: 861–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Ferrara, Eliana. 2005. ‘Ethnic diversity and economic performance.’ Journal of Economic Literature 43(3): 762–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William and Levine, Ross. 1997. ‘Africa's growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(4): 1203–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2004. ‘Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa.’ American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 849–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. ‘Fractionalization.’ Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155–194. For details see: www.stanford.edu/~wacziarg/papersum.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J.. 2001. Modern Hatreds: The Symbolic Politics of Ethnic Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel. 2004. ‘Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa.’ American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 849–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A.. 1990. ‘Political democracy: Conceptual and measurement traps.’ Studies in International Development 25(2): 7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34Google Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Generating better data: A response to discussants.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 52–57.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 2004. ‘Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries.’ Governance 17(4): 525–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkerhoff, Derick W. and Goldsmith, Arthur A.. 2005. ‘Institutional dualism and international development: A revisionist interpretation of good governance.’ Administration and Society 37(2): 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. ‘Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts.’ Annual Review of Political Science 1: 537–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Dataset Users' Manual. College Park: University of Maryland. www.cidm.umd.edu/inscr/polityGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2002. ‘The end of the transition paradigm.’ Journal of Democracy 13: 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. ‘The rise of illiberal democracy.’ Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. ‘Thinking about hybrid regimes.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. ‘The rise of competitive authoritarianism.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armony, Ariel C. and Schamis, Hector E.. 2005. ‘Babel in democratization studies.’ Journal of Democracy 16(4): 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. M. and Roessler, P. G.. 2006. ‘Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes.’ American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Lindblom, Charles E.. 1953. Politics, Economics, and Welfare. New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press p. 221Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 2005. ‘What political institutions does large-scale democracy require?Political Science Quarterly 120(2): 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, p. 221.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Dataset Users' Manual. College Park: University of Maryland. www.cidm.umd.edu/inscr/polityGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel. 1992. Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foweraker, Joe and Krznaric, Roman. 2003. ‘Differentiating the democratic performance of the West.’ European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 313–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foweraker, Joe and Krznaric, Roman. 2000. ‘Measuring liberal democratic performance: An empirical and conceptual critique.’ Political Studies 48: 759–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1996. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J.. 1999. ‘Determinants of democracy.’ Journal of Political Economy 107(6): 158–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christopher. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. ‘Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts.’ Annual Review of Political Science 1: 537–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Freedom. 2007. Freedom in the World, 2007. Washington, DC: Freedom House. www.freedomhouse.orgGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Burkhart, R. E.. 2000. ‘Economic freedom and democracy: Post–cold war tests.’ European Journal of Political Research 37(2): 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, Bruce Bueno, Downs, G. W., Smith, Alistair, and Cherif, F. M.. 2005. ‘Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights.’ International Studies Quarterly 49(3): 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1974. ‘Persistence and change in political systems.’ American Political Science Review 74: 1482–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty, Gurr, Ted Robert, Davenport, Christian, and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. ‘Polity IV, 1800–1999: Comments on Munck and Verkuilen.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 40–45.Google Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Gurr, Ted Robert, Davenport, Christian, and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. ‘Polity IV, 1800–1999: Comments on Munck and Verkuilen.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 40–45.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1990. The Process of Democratization: A Comparative Study of 147 States: 1980–88. New York: Crane RussakGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1997. Prospects for Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. ‘A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998.’ Journal of Peace Research 37(2): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Bollen, Kenneth A., Lee, Deborah M., and Kim, Hyo Joung. 2003. ‘A half century of suffrage: New data and a comparative analysis.’ Studies in Comparative International Development 38(1): 93–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L.. 2004. ‘Inclusion and democratization: Class, gender, race, and the extension of suffrage.’ Comparative Politics 36(4): 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Mark N.. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1990. The Process of Democratization: A Comparative Study of 147 States: 1980–88. New York: Crane RussakGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1997. Prospects for Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2000. ‘A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998.’ Journal of Peace Research 37(2): 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, M. and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. ‘Effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe.’ Comparative Political Studies. 12: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. ‘Minimalist conception of democracy: A defense.’ In Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano (Eds.), Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1947. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. 1942. Party Government. New York: HoltGoogle Scholar
Anckar, D. and Anckar, C.. 2000. ‘Democracies without parties.’ Comparative Political Studies 33(2): 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Massicote, Louis, and Yoshinaka, A.. 2001. ‘Deciding who has the right to vote: A comparative analysis of election laws.’ Electoral Studies 20(1): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2000. ‘Women's suffrage in the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization.’ Studies in Comparative International Development 35(3): 92–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L.. 2004. ‘Inclusion and democratization: Class, gender, race, and the extension of suffrage.’ Comparative Politics 36(4): 443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Bollen, Kenneth A., Lee, Deborah M., and Kim, Hyo Joung. 2003. ‘A half century of suffrage: New data and a comparative analysis.’ Studies in Comparative International Development 38(1): 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkerhoff, Derick W. and Goldsmith, Arthur A.. 2005. ‘Institutional dualism and international development: A revisionist interpretation of good governance.’ Administration and Society 37(2): 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 2004. ‘Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries.’ Governance 17(4): 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. ‘Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts.’ Annual Review of Political Science 1: 537–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary. 2000. ‘Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations.’ American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Critical Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L.. 2001. ‘The regime question: Theory building in democracy studies.’ World Politics 54(1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1999. ‘Thickening thin concepts and theories: Combining large N and small in comparative politics.’ Comparative Politics 31(4): 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan. 1995. ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data.’ American Political Science Review. 89: 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, B.. 1992. The Black Man's Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1964. Considerations on Representative Government (1859). London: Dent.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Seong, Kyoung-Ryung, and Torres, John Charles. 1993. ‘A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy.’ International Social Science Journal 45(2): 154–175Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Lakin, Jason M.. 2004. The Democratic Century. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Lakin, Jason M.. 2004. The Democratic Century. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press, chapter 5.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. ‘Transitions to democracy.’ Comparative Politics 2: 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieckhaus, J.. 2004. ‘The regime debate revisited: A sensitivity analysis of democracy's economic effect.’ British Journal of Political Science 34(4): 635–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W.. 1973. ‘On the relation of economic development and democratic performance.’ American Journal of Political Science 17: 611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A.. 1979. ‘Political democracy and the timing of development.’ American Sociological Review 44: 572–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A.. 1983. ‘World system position, dependency and democracy: The cross-national evidence.’ American Sociological Review 48: 468–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. and Jackman, Robert W.. 1985. ‘Political democracy and the size distribution of income.’ American Sociological Review 50: 438–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunk, Gregory C., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 1987. ‘Capitalism, socialism, and democracy: An empirical inquiry.’ European Journal of Political Research 15: 459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Rueschmeyer, Dietrich, and Stephens, John D.. 1993. ‘The impact of economic development on democracy.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(3): 71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhart, Ross E. and Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 1994. ‘Comparative democracy: The economic development thesis.’ American Political Science Review 88: 903–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, John F.. 1994. ‘Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth.’ British Journal of Political Science 24(2): 225–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 1997. Prospects for Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J.. 1999. ‘Determinants of democracy.’ Journal of Political Economy 107(6): 158–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, Seong, Kyoung-Ryung, and Torres, John Charles. 1993. ‘A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy.’ International Social Science Journal 45(2): 154–175Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Lakin, Jason M.. 2004. The Democratic Century. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 1996. ‘What makes democracies endure?Journal of Democracy 7(1): 39–55Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Limongi, F.. 1997. ‘Modernization: Theories and facts.’ World Politics 49: 155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. ‘Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts.’ Annual Review of Political Science 1: 537–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1999. ‘Thickening thin concepts and theories: Combining large N and small in comparative politics.’ Comparative Politics 31(4): 465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. ‘Minimalist conception of democracy: A defense.’ In Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano (Eds.), Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Munck, Geraldo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices.’ Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2000. ‘Women's suffrage in the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization.’ Studies in Comparative International Development 35(3): 92–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L.. 2004. ‘Inclusion and democratization: Class, gender, race, and the extension of suffrage.’ Comparative Politics 36(4): 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J.. 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J.. 1999. ‘Determinants of democracy.’ Journal of Political Economy 107(6–2): 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Lakin, Jason M.. 2004. The Democratic Century. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press, chapter 11.Google Scholar
Ross, M. L. 2001. ‘Does oil hinder democracy?World Politics 53: 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1995. ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data.’ American Political Science Review 89: 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 2001. ‘Time-series/cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years?Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Tufte, E. R.. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Spolaore, Enrico. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clague, Christopher, Gleason, Suzanne, and Knack, Stephen. 2001. ‘Determinants of lasting democracy in poor countries: Culture, development and institutions.’ Annals of the American Academy of Social Sciences 573: 16–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Lakin, Jason M.. 2004. The Democratic Century. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press, chapter 11. See also similar findings in Axel Hadenius. 1994. ‘The duration of democracy.’Google Scholar
Beetham, David. 1994. Defining and Measuring Democracy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey and Lindborg, Christina. 2003. ‘Democratic dominoes: Diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 35(2): 356–381Google Scholar
Wejnart, Barbara. 2005. ‘Diffusion, development and democracy, 1800–1999.’ American Sociological Review 70(1): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and LaFerrara, E.. 2005. ‘Ethnic diversity and economic performance.’ Journal of Economic Literature 43(3): 762–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. ‘Fractionalization.’ Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155–194. For details see: www.stanford.edu/~wacziarg/papersum.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, William and Levine, Ross. 1997. ‘Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions.’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1203–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, David. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Cutright, P.. 1963. ‘National political development: Measurement and analysis.’ American Sociological Review 28: 253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Evelyne Huber, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Stephens, John D.. 1993. ‘The impact of economic development on democracy.’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(3): 71–85Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolen, Kenneth and Jackman, Robert. 1985. ‘Political democracy and the size distribution of income.’ American Sociological Review 52(2): 50–68Google Scholar
Burkhart, Ross E.. 1997. ‘Comparative democracy and income distribution: Shape and direction of the causal arrow.’ Journal of Politics 59(1): 148–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midlarsky, Manus I.. Ed. 1997. Inequality, Democracy and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barro, Robert J.. 1999. ‘Determinants of democracy.’ Journal of Political Economy 107(6): 158–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxer, Carl J.. 2002. From Transition to Power Alternation: Democracy in South Korea, 1987–1997. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sunhyuk. 2000. The Politics of Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society. Pittburgh: University of Pittsburgh PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihl, Young W.. 2005. Transforming Korean Politics: Democracy, Reform, and Culture. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Park, Chan Wook. 2002. ‘Elections in Democratizing Korea.’ In Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng and Newman, David (Eds.), How Asia Votes. New York: Chatham House, Table 6.5.Google Scholar
Trocki, Carl A.. 2006. Singapore: Wealth, Power and the Culture of Control. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Mauzy, Diane K. and Milne, R. S.. 2002. Singapore Politics under the People's Action Party. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Michael. Ed. 1999. The Singapore Puzzle. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Mauzy, Diane K.. 2002. ‘Electoral innovation and one-party dominance in Singapore.’ In Hsieh, John Fuh-Sheng and Newman, David (Eds.), How Asia Votes. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Elkit, Jorgen and Svensson, Palle. 1997. ‘What makes elections free and fair?Journal of Democracy 8(3): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. The Human Development Report, 2004. New York: Oxford University Press.
Halperin, Morton H., Siegle, Joseph T., and Weinstein, Michael M.. 2005. The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton H., Siegle, Joseph T., and Weinstein, Michael M.. 2005. The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace. New York: Routledge, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar
Kosack, Stephen. 2003. ‘Effective aid: How democracy allows development aid to improve the quality of life.’ World Development 31(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend and Waisman, Carlos. 1996. Institutional Design in New Democracies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 2004. ‘Constitutional design for divided societies.’ Journal of Democracy 15(2): 96–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2001. ‘Ethnic bargains, group instability, and social choice theory.’ Politics & Society 29(3): 337–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2005. ‘Ethnic parties and democratic stability.’ Perspectives on Politics 3(2): 235–252.Google Scholar
Fennema, Meindert. 2000. ‘Legal repression of extreme-right parties and racial discrimination.’ In Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul (Eds.), Challenging Immigration and Ethnic Relations Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Carter, Elisabeth, and Farrell, David M.. 2003. ‘Changing party access to elections.’ In Cain, Bruce, Dalton, Russell, and Scarrow, Susan (Eds.), Democracy Transformed?Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Elisabeth. 2005. The Extreme Right in Western Europe: Success or Failure?Manchester: Manchester University Press, chapter 5Google ScholarPubMed
Norris, Pippa. 2005. Radical Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapter 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns. Stockholm: International IDEA.
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. ‘Unequal participation: Democracies’ unresolved dilemma.' American Political Science Review 91: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Leary, Brendan and McGarry, John. 2006. ‘Consociational theory, Northern Ireland's conflict and its agreement: 1. What consociationalists can learn from Northern Ireland.’ Government & Opposition 41(1): 43–63.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1986. ‘Proportionality by non-PR methods: Ethnic representation in Belgium, Cyprus, Lebanon, New Zealand, West Germany and Zimbabwe.’ In Grofman, Bernard, and Lijphart, Arend (Eds.), Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. ‘Unequal participation: Democracies’ unresolved dilemma.' American Political Science Review 91: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2005. ‘Ethnic parties and democratic stability.’ Perspectives on Politics 3(2): 235–252.Google Scholar
Jarstad, Anna. 2001. Changing the Game: Consociational Theory and Ethnic Quotas in Cyprus and New Zealand. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict, Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2005. ‘Reserved seats in national legislatures.’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(2): 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2002. ‘Ballots not bullets: Electoral systems, ethnic minorities and democratization.’ In Reynolds, Andrew and Mainwaring, Scott (Eds.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2001. ‘Ethnic bargains, group instability, and social choice theory.’ Politics & Society 29(3): 337–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C. and Shvetsova, Olga. 1994. ‘Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude and the number of parties.’ American Journal of Political Science 38: 100–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, Octavio Amorim and Cox, Gary. 1997. ‘Electoral institutions, cleavage structures and the number of parties.’ American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan L.. ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina.’ In Walter, Barbara F. and Snyder, Jack (Eds.), Civil Wars, Insecurity and Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 96.
Snyder, Jack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 296–308.Google Scholar
O'Leary, Brendan and McGarry, John. 2004. The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2005. Radical Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Donald. 2002. ‘Settlement terms and post-agreement stability.’ In Stedman, Stephen, Rothchild, Donald, and Cousens, Elizabeth (Eds.), Ending Civil Wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne ReinnerGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis. Volume 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Ben. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, . 2002. ‘Electoral systems for divided societies.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 156–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1999. ‘Electoral rules and electoral coordination.’ Annual Review of Political Science 2: 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1991. A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1993. ‘Democracy in divided societies.’ Journal of Democracy 4: 18–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 2002. ‘Constitutional design: Proposals versus processes.’ In Reynolds, Andrew and Mainwaring, Scott (Eds.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew and Reilly, Ben. 1999. Electoral Systems and Conflict in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
Reilly, Ben. 2001. Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, J. and Grofman, Bernie. 2004. ‘A neo-Downsian model of the alternative vote as a mechanism for mitigating ethnic conflict in plural societies.’ Public Choice 121(3–4): 487–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 2004. ‘The alternative vote and interethnic moderation: A reply to Fraenkel and Grofman.’ Public Choice 121(3–4): 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick and Margetts, Helen. 1995. ‘Understanding the dynamics of electoral reform.’ International Political Science Review 16(1): 9–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 2005. ‘Conclusions.’ In Gallagher, Michael and Mitchell, Paul (Eds.), The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. Ed. 2002. The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew. 2005. International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System. Stockholm: International IDEA Design. http://www.idea.int/esd/index.cfmGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard. Eds. 2000. Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew, Reilly, Ben, and Ellis, Andrew. 2005. International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System. Stockholm: International IDEA Design.Google Scholar
Colomer, M.. 2004. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University, Press.
Massicotte, Louise and Blais, Andre. 1999. ‘Mixed electoral systems: A conceptual and empirical survey.’ Electoral Studies 18(3): 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. ‘The rise of illiberal democracy.’ Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. ‘Thinking about hybrid regimes.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A.. 2002. ‘The rise of competitive authoritarianism.’ Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51–65; Stephen Levitsky. 2003. ‘Autocracy by democratic rules: The dynamics of competitive authoritarianism in the post–cold war era.’ Paper presented at the Conference, “Mapping the Great Zone: Clientelism and the Boundary between Democratic and Democratizing,” Columbia University, April 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?New York: Oxford University Press.
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Chandler and Grofman, Bernard. Eds. 1994. Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of the Voting Rights Act 1965–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kim, J.-O. and Ohn, M.-G.. 1992. ‘A theory of minor-party persistence: Election rule, social cleavage, and the number of political parties.’ Social Forces 70: 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Wlezien, Christopher. Eds. 2005. Britain Votes 2005. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jarstad, Anna. 2001. Changing the Game: Consociational Theory and Ethnic Quotas in Cyprus and New Zealand. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict, Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2005. ‘Reserved seats in national legislatures.’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(2): 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick and Margetts, Helen. 2004. ‘The United Kingdom: Reforming the Westminster Model.’ In Colomer, Josep M. (Ed.), Handbook of Electoral System Choice. London: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Brigitte and Thomson, Katarina. 1999. Scotland and Wales: Nations Again?Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, James, Exley, Sonia, and Heath, Anthony. 2004. ‘Dimensions of British identity.’ In Park, Alison et al. (Eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 21st Report. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Trench, A.. Ed. 2004. Has Devolution Made a Difference? The State of the Nations, 2004. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Nagel, Jack H.. 2004. ‘New Zealand: Reform by (nearly) immaculate design.’ In Colomer, Josep M. (Ed.), Handbook of Electoral System Choice. London: Palgrave.
Hampton, A.. 1995. ‘The limitations of the prescriptive dimensions of Lijphart's consensus model: A case study of the incorporation of Māori within New Zealand's democratic system, 1984–1995.’ Political Science 47(2): 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, D.. 1999. The Maori and the Crown: An Indigenous People's Struggle for Self-Determination. Westport, CT: Greenwood PressGoogle Scholar
Barker, F., Boston, J., Levine, S., McLeay, E., and Roberts, N. S.. 2003. ‘An initial assessment of the consequences of MMP in New Zealand.’ In Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Marty P. (Eds.), Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vowles, Jack. 2002. ‘Parties and society in New Zealand.’ In Webb, Paul, Farrell, David, and Holliday, Ian (Eds.), Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Table 14.3.Google Scholar
Boston, Jonathan, Levine, Stephen, McLeay, Elizabeth, and Roberts, Nigel S.. 1996. New Zealand under MMP: A New Politics?Auckland: Auckland University PressGoogle Scholar
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Banducci, Susan, and Karp, Jeffrey. 1998. Voters' Victory? New Zealand's First Election under Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University PressGoogle Scholar
Miller, Raymond. 1998. ‘New Zealand First.’ In Bens, Hans-Georg and Immerfall, Stefan. Eds. The New Politics of the Right. New York: St. Martin's PressGoogle Scholar
Denemark, D. and Bowler, Shaun. 2002. ‘Minor parties and protest votes in Australia and New Zealand: Locating populist politics.’ Electoral Studies 21(1): 47–67. Another new right-wing party is ACT New Zealand, but their party program emphasizes libertarian principles governing the market and immigration policies as well, so that they do not qualify for the radical right as such.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2002 ‘Ballots not bullets: Electoral systems, ethnic minorities and democratization.’ In Reynolds, Andrew and Mainwaring, Scott (Eds.), The Architecture of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Banducci, Susan A., Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2004. ‘Minority representation, empowerment, and participation.’ Journal of Politics 66(2): 534–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1996. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1990. ‘The perils of presidentialism.’ Journal of Democracy 1(1): 51–69Google Scholar
Linz, Juan and Valenzuela, Arturo. Eds. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt. Ed. 1996. Presidential v. Parliamentary Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stepan, Alfred and Skach, Cindy. 1993. ‘Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism and presidentialism.’ World Politics 46(1): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Cheibub, José, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, Fred W.. 1997. ‘Presidentialism versus parliamentarism: Implications for representativeness and legitimacy.’ International Political Science Review 18(3): 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred and Skach, Cindy. 1993. ‘Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism and presidentialism.’ World Politics 46(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schugart, Mathew Soberg and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. ‘Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy – the difficult combination.’ Comparative Political Studies 26(2): 198–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José and Limongi, Fernando. 2002. ‘Democratic institutions and regime survival: Parliamentary and presidential democracies reconsidered.’ Annual Review of Political Science 5: 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José, Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, S. M.. 2004. ‘Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism.’ British Journal of Political Science 34: 565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José. 2002. ‘Minority governments, deadlock situations, and the survival of presidential democracies.’ Comparative Political Studies 35: 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schugart, Mathew Soberg and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo. Eds. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. Eds. 1997. Presidential Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Frye, Timothy. 1997. ‘A politics of institutional choice: Post-communist presidencies.’ Comparative Political Studies 30: 523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Stephen. 2006. ‘Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies.’ Journal of Democracy 17(1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beliaev, M. V.. 2006. ‘Presidential powers and consolidation of new post-communist democracies.’ Comparative Political Studies 39(3): 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, Massicotte, Louis, and Dobrynska, Agnieszka. 1997. ‘Direct presidential elections: A world summary.’ Electoral Studies 16(4): 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Samuel E.. 1999. The History of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, John. Ed. 2005. World Monarchies and Dynasties. New York: Sharpe Reference.
Blondel, Jean. 1984. ‘Dual leadership in the contemporary world: A step towards executive and regime stability?’ In Kavanagh, Denis and Peele, Gillean (Eds.), Comparative Government and Politics. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Huber, John D.. 1996. ‘The vote of confidence in parliamentary democracies.’ American Political Science Review 90: 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, Philip. 2004. ‘Parliament: More Bleak House than Great Expectations.’ Parliamentary Affairs 57(2): 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesse, N. G.. 1996. ‘Thatcher's rise and fall: An institutional analysis of the Tory leadership selection process.’ Electoral Studies 15(2): 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, T. A.. 1989. Governing by Committee: Collegial Leadership in Advanced Societies. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Shepsle, Kenneth. Eds. 1994. Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schedler, Andreas. Ed. 2005. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
Blais, André, Massicotte, Louis, and Dobrynska, Agnieszka. 1997. ‘Direct presidential elections: A world summary.’ Electoral Studies 16(4): 441–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, AndréMassicotte, Louis, and Dobrynska, Agnieszka. 1997. ‘Direct presidential elections: A world summary.’ Electoral Studies 16(4): 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M.. 2003. ‘Presidentialism and representative institutions.’ In Dominguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael (Eds.), Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Blondel, Jean and Manning, N.. 2002. ‘Do ministers do what they say? Ministerial unreliability, collegial and hierarchical governments.’ Political Studies 50(3): 455–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Colin and Wyszimirski, M. J.. Eds. 1991. Executive Leadership in Anglo-American Systems. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Duverger, Maurice. 1980. ‘A new political-system model – semi-presidential government.’ European Journal of Political Research 8: 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahro, H.. 1998. ‘Duverger's concept: Semi-presidential government revisited.’ European Journal of Political Research 34: 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siaroff, Alan. 2003. ‘Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential, and parliamentary distinction.’ European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgie, Robert. 1997. ‘Models of executive politics: A framework for the study of executive power relations in parliamentary and semi-presidential regimes.’ Political Studies 155: 217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Lee Kendall. 2000. ‘Measuring presidential power.’ Comparative Political Studies 33(5): 660–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 1997. ‘A politics of institutional choice: Post-communist presidencies.’ Comparative Political Studies 30: 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schugart, Mathew Soberg and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Kendall. 2000. ‘Measuring presidential power.’ Comparative Political Studies 33(5): 660–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Ludger. 2005. Presidents, Prime Ministers and Chancellors: Executive Leadership in Western Democracies. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, T. A.. 1996. ‘President versus prime ministers: Shaping executive authority in Eastern Europe.’ World Politics 48(3): 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protsyk, O.. 2006. ‘Intra-executive competition between president and prime minister: Patterns of institutional conflict and cooperation under semi-presidentialism.’ Political Studies 54(2): 219–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beliaev, M. V.. 2006. ‘Presidential powers and consolidation of new post-communist democracies.’ Comparative Political Studies 39(3): 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poguntke, Thomas and Webb, Paul. Eds. 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press/ECPR.CrossRef
Tsebelis, G.. 1995. ‘Decision-making in political-systems – veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism.’ British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt. Ed. 1996. Presidential v. Parliamentary Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siaroff, Alan. 2003. ‘Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential, and parliamentary distinction.’ European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edrisinha, Rohan and Seymour, Lee with Griffiths, Ann. 2005. ‘Adopting federalism: Sri Lanka and Sudan.’ In Griffiths, Ann L.. Ed. Handbook of Federal Countries, 2005. Montreal: Forum of Federations/McGill University Press.Google Scholar
Prudhomme, Remy. 1995. ‘The dangers of decentralization.’ World Bank Research Observer 10(2): 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, James. 1999. The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization. Washington, DC: World BankCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Richard M. and Vaillancourt, François. Eds. 1999. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Ahmad, Ehtisham. Ed. 2002. Fiscal Decentralization. London: Routledge
Wibbels, Erik. 2005. Federalism and the Market: Intergovernmental Conflict and Economic Reform in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denters, Bas and Rose, Lawrence. Eds. 2005. Comparing Local Governance: Trends and Developments. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.CrossRef
Page, C. and Goldsmith, Michael. 1987. Central and Local Government Relations. London: Sage
Page, C.. 1991. Localism and Centralism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Michael. 2002. ‘Central control over local government: A Western European comparison.’ Local Government Studies 28(3): 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegarescu, Dan. 2005. ‘Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends.’ Fiscal Studies 26(3): 301–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Michiel S.. 2000. ‘The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries.’ European Journal of Political Research 38: 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 1999. ‘Federalism and democracy: Beyond the U.S. model.’ Journal of Democracy 10(4): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erk, Jan. 2006. ‘Does federalism really matter?Comparative Politics 39(1): 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2007. The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickson, R. A.. 1995. Local Government in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne ReinnerGoogle Scholar
Santos, B. D.. 1998. ‘Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a redistributive democracy.’ Politics & Society 26(4): 461–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, A., Lavalle, A. G., and Houtzager, P. P.. 2004. ‘Civil society representation in the participatory budget and deliberative councils of Sao Paulo, Brazil.’ IDS Bulletin-Institute of Development Studies 35(2): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R. and Gatti, R.. 2002. ‘Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries.’ Journal of Public Economics 83(3): 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, David and Gaebler, T.. 1993. Reinventing Government. New York: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
Keman, Hans. 2000. ‘Federalism and policy performance.’ In Wachendorfer-Schmidt, Ute (Ed.), Federalism and Policy Performance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ranson, Stuart and Stuart, John. 1994. Management for the Public Domain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H.. 1964. Federalism: Origins, Operations, Significance. Boston: Little BrownGoogle Scholar
Oates, W.. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, p. 196.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2002. ‘The import of institutions.’ Journal of Democracy 13(12): 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Alfred. 1999. ‘Federalism and democracy: Beyond the U.S. model.’ Journal of Democracy 10(4): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993. Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, M.. 2000. Containing Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2005. Federalism and the Market: Intergovernmental Conflict and Economic Reform in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prudhomme, Remy. 1995. ‘The dangers of decentralization.’ World Bank Research Observer 10(2): 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranson, Stuart and Stuart, John. 1994. Management for the Public Domain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1994. Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements. Essex: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Ann L.. Ed. Handbook of Federal Countries, 2005. Montreal: Forum of Federations/McGill University Press.
Simeaon, Richard and Conway, Daniel-Patrick. 2001. ‘Federalism and the management of conflict in multinational societies.’ In Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tully, James (Eds.), Multinational Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Ronald L.. 2006. Models of Federal Power-Sharing. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E.. 2004. ‘Divided we stand: Institutional sources of ethno-federal state survival and collapse.’ World Politics 56: 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Henry E.. 2004. ‘Divided we stand: Institutional sources of ethno-federal state survival and collapse.’ World Politics 56: 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1972. Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for International Affairs.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and Destruction of Socialism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen and Scarritt, James R.. 1999. ‘Why territorial autonomy is not a viable option for managing ethnic conflict in African plural societies.’ Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 1992. ‘The dynamics of secession.’ Acta Sociologica 35(4): 267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustik, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J.. 2004. ‘Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it?American Political Science Review 98(2): 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. ‘Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?International Organization 60(3): 651–685Google Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2007. Design over Conflict: Managing Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism through Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. ‘Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement.’ Comparative Politics 36(4): 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, U.. 1999. ‘On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence.’ Journal of Public Economics 74(1): 97–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegarescu, Dan. 2005. ‘Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends.’ Fiscal Studies 26(3): 301–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickson, R. A.. 1995. Local Government in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2006. ‘Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?International Organization 60(3): 651–685.Google Scholar
Rodden, J.. 2004. ‘Comparative federalism and decentralization: On meaning and measurement.’ Comparative Politics 36(4): 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1994. Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Watts, Ronald L.. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems, 2nd ed. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University PressGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Michael. 1993. ‘Federalism and federation: A reappraisal.’ In Burgess, Michael and Gagnon, Alain-G. (Eds.), Comparative Federalism and Federation. London: Harvester WheatsheafGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. 1982. Federalism and Federation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown, p. 11.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C. and Mughan, Anthony. Eds. 1999. Senates: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Columbus: Ohio State University Press
Tsebelis, George and Money, Jeannette. 1997. Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Alfred. 1999. ‘Federalism and democracy: Beyond the U.S. model.’ Journal of Democracy 10(4): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, C.. 2002. ‘Brazil: The prospects of a center-constraining federation in a fragmented polity.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 32(2): 23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. ‘Multipartism, robust federalism, and presidentialism in Brazil.’ In Mainwaring, Scott and Shugart, Matthew Soberg (Eds.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethell, Leslie 2000. ‘Politics in Brazil: From elections without democracy to democracy without citizenship.’ Daedalus 129(2): 1–27.Google Scholar
Means, Gordon P.. 2005. ‘Malaysia.’ In Griffiths, Ann L. (Ed.), Handbook of Federal Countries, 2005. Montreal: Forum of Federations/McGill University Press.Google Scholar
McAuley, Alastair. Ed. 1991. Soviet Federalism: Nationalism and Economic Decentralization. Leicester: Leicester University Press
Pascal, Elizabeth. 2003. Defining Russian Federalism. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Herd, G. P.. ‘Russia: Systemic transformation or federal collapse?Journal of Peace Research 36(3): 259–269.
Bahry, D.. 2005. ‘The new federalism and the paradoxes of regional sovereignty in Russia.’ Comparative Politics 37(2): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Michael S.. 2000. ‘The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries.’ European Journal of Political Research 38: 193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Ed C.. 1991. Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Self-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trocki, Carl A.. 2006. Singapore: Wealth, Power and the Culture of Control. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Mauzy, Diane K. and Milne, R. S.. 2002. Singapore Politics under the People's Action Party. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 2006. ‘The constitutional revolution in the United Kingdom.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 36(1): 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Ronald L.. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems, 2nd ed. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press, chapter 1.Google Scholar
Geering, John and Thacker, Strom C.. 2004. ‘Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism.’ British Journal of Political Science 34: 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J.. Ed. 1991. Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements. Detroit: Gale Research
Watts, Ronald L.. 1999. Comparing Federal Systems, 2nd ed. Kingston, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press, chapter 1Google Scholar
Griffiths, Ann L.. Ed. 2005. Handbook of Federal Countries, 2005. Montreal: Forum of Federations/McGill University Press.
Schneider, Aaron. 2003. ‘Decentralization: Conceptualization and measurement.’ Studies in Comparative International Development 38(3): 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Ronald L.. 1999. The Spending Power in Federal Systems: A Comparative Study. Kingston, Canada: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations Queens University.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2006. Peace and Conflict 2005. Baltimore: University of Maryland CIDCM.Google Scholar
Hossain, Akhtar. 2000. ‘Anatomy of hartal politics in Bangladesh.’ Asian Survey 40(3): 508–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, Stanley A.. 2000. ‘Governance, patronage politics, and democratic transition in Bangladesh.’ Asian Survey 40(3): 530–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillin, Louise. 2007. ‘United in diversity? Asymmetry in Indian federalism.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37(1): 45–67.Google Scholar
Sinha, Aseema. 2005. The Regional Roots of Development Politics in India: A Divided Leviathan. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Rajashekara, H. M.. 1997. ‘The nature of Indian federalism: A critique.’ Asian Survey 37(3): 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. P. and Verney, D. V.. 2003. ‘Challenges to India's centralized parliamentary federalism.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 33(4): 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, P. and Murali, G.. 2006. ‘Duvergerian dynamics in the Indian states – Federalism and the number of parties in the state assembly elections.’ Party Politics 12(1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2003. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G. and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2006. Peace and Conflict 2005. Baltimore: University of Maryland CIDCM.Google Scholar
Currie, B.. 1997. ‘Multiple identities in a single state: Indian federalism in comparative perspective.’ Journal of Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 35(1): 125–126Google Scholar
Singh, M. P. and Verney, D. V.. 2003. ‘Challenges to India's centralized parliamentary federalism.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 33(4): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deSouza, Peter Ronald. 2003. ‘The struggle for local government: Indian democracy's new phase.’ Publius: The Journal of Federalism 33(4): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra and Duflo, Esther. 2004. ‘Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India.’ Econometrica 72(5): 1409–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, J. P.. 1997. ‘The Gram Sabha: Gateway to grassroots democracy.’ Journal of Rural Development 16: 557–573.Google Scholar
Rashid, A.. 2005. ‘The politics of administrative decentralization in Bangladesh.’ Canadian Journal of Development Studies 26(4): 781–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asante, Clement E.. Press Freedom and Development: A Research Guide and Selected Bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Shah, H.. 1996. ‘Modernization, marginalization and emancipation: Toward a normative model of journalism and national development.’ Communication Theory 6(2)Google Scholar
McQuail, Denis. 2001. Political Communication Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hyden, GoranLeslie, Michael, and Ogundimu, Folu F.. Eds. 2002. Media and Democracy in Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
Sen, Amartya. 1999. ‘Democracy as a universal value.’ Journal of Democracy 10: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor BooksGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin. 2001. ‘Political agency, government responsiveness and the role of the media.’ European Economic Review 45 (4–6): 629–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfenson, James D.. 1999. ‘Voices of the poor.’ Washington Post, 10 November 1999, A39.Google Scholar
Adsera, Alicia, Boix, Carlos, and Payne, Mark. 2003. ‘Are you being served? Political accountability and governmental performance.’ Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 19: 445–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. K.. 2004. ‘The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test.’ Economics Letters 85(1): 93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, A. and Weder, B.. 2003. ‘A free press is bad news for corruption.’ Journal of Public Economics 87 (7–8): 1801–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Barry. Ed. 2006. Media Development and Poverty Eradication. Paris: UNESCO
Islam, Roumeen. 2003. Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better?Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anable, D.. 2006. ‘The role of Georgia's media – and Western aid – in the Rose Revolution.’ Harvard International Journal of Press – Politics 11(3): 7–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2005. ‘Transitions from post-communism.’ Journal of Democracy 16(3): 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. ‘Global political communication.’ In Esser, Frank and Pfetsch, Barbara (Eds.), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Alasdair. 2006. Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, Roumeen. Ed. 2002. The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development. Washington, DC: World Bank; Roumeen IslamCrossRef
2003. Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better?Washington, DC: World Bank
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2001. Digital Divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Pye, Lucian W.. 1963. Communications and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. ‘Some social prerequisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.’ American Political Science Review 53: 69–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrone, Donald J. and Cnudde, Charles F.. 1967. ‘Toward a communication theory of democratic political development: A causal model.’ American Political Science Review 61(1): 72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, p. 60Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1993. The Third Wave. Norman: The University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
Mowlana, Hamid. 1985. International Flow of Information: A Global Report and Analysis. Paris: UNESCOGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Robert L. and Shaw, Donald Lewis. Eds. 1984. Foreign News and the New World Information Order. Ames: Iowa State University Press
Hur, K. Kyloon. 1984. ‘A critical analysis of international news flow research.’ Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1: 365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, William, Herman, Edward S., and Schiller, Herbert I.. 1989. Hope and Folly: The United States and UNESCO 1945–1985. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, George A., Tichenor, Philip, et al. 1995. ‘A guard dog perspective on the role of the media.’ Journal of Communication 45(2): 115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, Renate. 1986. ‘Bloodhounds or missionaries: Role definitions of German and British journalists.’ European Journal of Communication 1: 43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunetti, A. and Weder, B.. 2003. ‘A free press is bad news for corruption.’ Journal of Public Economics 87 (7–8): 1801–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, S. K.. 2004. ‘The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test.’ Economics Letters 85(1): 93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, D.. 2005. ‘Political and media liberalization and political corruption in Taiwan.’ China Quarterly 18(4): 875–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, Leonard R.. 2001. Press Freedom in Our Genes. Reston, VA: World Press Freedom Committee.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Louis Edward. 1998. Press and Speech Freedoms in the World, from Antiquity until 1998: A Chronology. Westport, CT: Greenwood PressGoogle Scholar
Kalathil, Shanthi and Boas, Taylor C.. 2001. The Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba and the Counterrevolution. Global Policy Program No. 21. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Sussman, Leonard R.. 2000. ‘Censor Dot Gov: The Internet and press freedom.’ Press Freedom Survey 2000. Washington, DC: Freedom HouseGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter and Sparks, Colin. 1995. Communication and Citizenship. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, Peter. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Andriantsoa, P., Andriasendrarivony, N., Haggblade, S., Minten, B., Rakotojaona, M., Rakotovoavy, F., and Razafinimanana, H. S.. 2005. ‘Media proliferation and democratic transition in Africa: The case of Madagascar.’ World Development 33(11): 1939–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, Jeremy and Palmer, Michael. 1991. Media Moguls. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1991. The Age of Behemoths: The Globalization of Mass Media Firms. New York: Priority PressGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Tabernero, Alfonso. 1993. Media Concentration in Europe: Commercial Enterprises and the Public Interest. London: John LibbeyGoogle Scholar
Bagdikian, Ben. 1997. The Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar
Bogart, Leo. 1995. Commercial Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: TransactionGoogle Scholar
McChesney, Robert. 1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Picard, Robert G.. 1988. Press Concentration and Monopoly: New Perspectives on Newspaper Ownership and Operation. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar
Hughes, S. and Lawson, C.. 2005. ‘The barriers to media opening in Latin America.’ Political Communication 22(1): 9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy and Burgess, Robin. 2001. ‘Political agency, government responsiveness and the role of the media.’ European Economic Review 45 (4–6): 629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, Burgess, Robin, and Prat, Andrea. 2003. The Right to Know: Information and the Media. Ed. Islam, Roumeen. Washington, DC: World BankGoogle Scholar
Islam, Roumeen. 2003. Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better?Washington, DC: World BankCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. ‘Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts.’ Annual Review of Political Science 1: 537–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clague, Christopher, Gleason, Suzanne, and Knack, Stephen. 2001. ‘Determinants of lasting democracy in poor countries: Culture, development and institutions.’ Annals of the American Academy of Social Sciences 573: 16–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. ‘Fractionalization.’ Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Tufte, E. R.. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Spolaore, Enrico. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
McFaul, Michael. 2005. ‘Transitions from postcommunism.’ Journal of Democracy 16: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunch, Valerie and Wolchik, Sharon l.. 2006. ‘International diffusion and post-Communist electoral revolutions.’ Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39(3): 283–304Google Scholar
Hale, Henry E.. 2005. ‘Regime cycles – democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia.’ World Politics 58(1): 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2003. ‘Rethinking recent democratization: Lessons from the postcommunist experience.’ World Politics 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Stephen E.. 2001. ‘Defining democratic consolidation.’ In Anderson, Richard D., Fish, M. Steven, Hanson, Stephen E., and Roeder, Philip G. (Eds.), Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Hale, Henry E.. 2005. ‘Regime cycles – democracy, autocracy, and revolution in post-Soviet Eurasia.’ World Politics 58(1): 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, Jr. Charles H. 2007. ‘Revolution reconsidered.’ Journal of Democracy 18(1): 42–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. and Jones, K.. 2006. ‘Fear of democracy or revolution: The reaction to Andijon.’ Washington Quarterly 29(3): 111Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 1997. ‘Ukraine: The perils of majoritarianism in a new democracy.’ In Reynolds, Andrew and Reilly, Ben (Eds.), The International IDEA Handbook of Electoral System Design. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral AssistanceGoogle Scholar
Birch, Sarah and Wilson, Andrew. 1999. ‘The Ukrainian parliamentary elections of 1998.’ Electoral Studies 18(2): 276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 1998. ‘Electoral reform in Ukraine: The 1988 parliamentary elections.’ Representation 35 (2/3): 146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Sarah and Wilson, Andrew. 1999. ‘The Ukrainian parliamentary elections of 1998.’ Electoral Studies 18(2): 276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Gerhard. 2006. ‘An orange-tinged revolution – the Ukrainian path to democracy.’ Russian Politics and Law 44(2): 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Anieri, P.. 2005. ‘What has changed in Ukrainian politics? Assessing the implications of the Orange Revolution.’ Problems of Post-Communism 52(5): 82–91Google Scholar
Christensen, Robert K., Rakhimkulov, Edward R., and Wise, Charles R.. 2005. ‘The Ukrainian Orange Revolution brought more than a new president: What kind of democracy will the institutional changes bring?Communist and Post-Communist Studies 38(2): 207–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, Charles 2007. ‘Revolution reconsidered.’ Journal of Democracy 18(1): 42–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. ‘Consociational democracy.’ World Politics 21: 207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in 36 Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Nanayakkara, V. K.. 2006. ‘From dominion to republican status: Dilemmas of constitution making in Sri Lanka.’ Public Administration and Development 26(5): 425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. Ed. 2002. The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef
Andweg, Rudy B.. 2000. ‘Consociational democracy.’ Annual Review of Politics 3: 509–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1975. ‘Review article: Political accommodation and consociational democracy.’ British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 194Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, S. G.. 2005. ‘Addressing ethnic divisions in post-conflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases.’ Security Dialogue 36(3): 297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Schneckener, Ulrich. 2002. ‘Making power-sharing work: Lessons from successes and failures in ethnic conflict regulation.’ Journal of Peace Research 39(2): 203–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Anna Morawiec. ‘Ethnic but equal: The quest for a new democratic order in Bosnia and Herzegovina.’ Columbia Law Review 103: 2015–2020
Paris, Roland. 2004. At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, Roland. 2005. At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank
Doyle, Michael W. and Sambanis, Nicholas. 2006. Making War and Building Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Lemarchand, Rene. 2007. ‘Consociationalism and power sharing in Africa: Rwanda, Burundi, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.’ African Affairs 106(422): 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D. P.. 2005. ‘The missing pillars: A look at the failure of peace in Burundi through the lens of Arend Lijphart's theory of consociational democracy.’ Journal of Modern African Studies 43(1): 75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuckovic, G.. 1997. Ethnic Cleavages and Conflict: The Sources of National Cohesion and Disintegration. The Case of Yugoslavia. Aldershot, England: AshgateGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. New York: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Institute for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 2004. Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: The Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Young, R.. 2003. ‘European approaches to democracy assistance: Learning the right lessons?Third World Quarterly 24(1): 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Edwards R. and Baker, Scott H.. 2006. Piecing a Democratic Quilt? Regional Organizations and Universal Norms. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian PressGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Perez-Linan, Anibal, and Seligson, Mitchell A. with Azpuru, Dinorah. 2005. Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building: Results from a Cross-National Quantitative Study. Washington, DC: USAIDGoogle Scholar
Monten, Jonathan. 2005. ‘The roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, nationalism, and democracy promotion in U.S. strategy.’ International Security 29(4): 112–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. 1999. Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Burnell, Peter. Ed. 2000. Democracy Assistance: International Co-Operation for Democratization. London: Frank Cass
Carothers, Thomas. 2004. Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, Hans Peter. 2004. ‘Domestic and transnational perspectives on democratization.’ International Studies Review 6: 403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh and Newman, Edwards. Eds. 2000. New Millennium, New Perspectives: The United Nations, Security and Governance. New York: UN University Press
Neuman, Edward and Rich, Roland. Eds. 2004. The UN Role in Promoting Democracy: Between Ideals and Reality. New York: UN University Press
Finkel, Steven E., Perez-Linan, Anibal, and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 2005. Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building. Nashville: USAID/Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Zeeuw, Joroen and Kumar, Krishna. 2006. Promoting Democracy in Postconflict Societies. Boulder, CO: Lynne ReinnerGoogle Scholar
Piccone, Ted and Youngs, Richard. Eds. 2006. Strategies for Democratic Change: Assessing the Global Response. Washington, DC: Democracy Coalition Project
Colomer, Joseph M.. Ed. 2004. Handbook of Electoral System Choice. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRef
Gallagher, Michael and Mitchell, Paul. Eds. 2006. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War. Washington, DC: World Bank
Zartman, William I.. 1995. Elusive Peace: Negotiating an End to Civil Wars 1995–1996. Washington, DC: Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
Hartzell, Caroline, Hoddie, Matthew, and Rothchild, Donald. 2001. ‘Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables.’ International Organization 55(1): 183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothchild, Donald. 2002. ‘Settlement terms and post-agreement stability.’ In Stedman, Stephen, Rothchild, Donald, and Cousens, Elizabeth (Eds.), Ending Civil Wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne ReinnerGoogle Scholar
Collier, Paul and Sambanis, Nicholas. Eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis. Volume 1. Washington, DC: World Bank
Wagner, Robert H.. 1993. ‘The causes of peace.’ In Licklider, Roy (Ed.), Stopping the Killing. New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Regan, Patrick M.. 2002. ‘Third party interventions and the duration of intrastate conflict.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1): 55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsbotham, Oliver, Woodhouse, Tom, and Miall, Hugh. 2006. Contemporary Conflict Resolution, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
Dobbins, James F.. 2003. ‘America's role in nation-building: From Germany to Iraq.’ Survival 45(4): 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, Toby. 2007. ‘The causes of US failure in Iraq.’ Survival 49(1): 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Snyder, Jack. 2007. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2004. ‘Can federalism stabilize Iraq?Washington Quarterly 27(2): 7–21Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. Ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner
Puddington, Arch. 2007. ‘The pushback against democracy.’ Journal of Democracy 18(2): 125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Notes
  • Pippa Norris, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Driving Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790614.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Notes
  • Pippa Norris, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Driving Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790614.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Notes
  • Pippa Norris, Harvard University, Massachusetts
  • Book: Driving Democracy
  • Online publication: 05 September 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790614.012
Available formats
×