Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:31:46.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Preservation of original natural vegetation in urban areas: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2010

Mark J. McDonnell
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne and University of Melbourne
Amy K. Hahs
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne and University of Melbourne
Jürgen H. Breuste
Affiliation:
Universität Salzburg
Get access

Summary

Preservation of original natural vegetation in urban areas

Over the past decades models for sustainable development of towns and cities have been created and discussed (see Naess,2001; Itoh, 2003). A component of such an ‘ecological approach’ is to preserve patches of the original vegetation as parts of the green structure in areas designated for future development, and to preserve remnant natural vegetation in already built-up areas. There are many examples from around the world where the original natural vegetation within cities has been preserved (e.g. Greller, 1975; Schmid, 1975; Florgård, 1978; Dyring, 1984; Olsen et al., 1987). This concept involves the preservation of the original natural vegetation in areas where buildings, roads and other structures are to be built, and the preservation of remnants of such vegetation in already built-up areas. Typically, the vegetation will be close to houses, roads and other developed areas. The vegetation can be natural or semi-natural which has developed with little or no human intervention over time. It also comprises stable post-agricultural plant communities such as meadows and pastureland. Thus, vegetation types such as natural and semi-natural forests and woodlands, bushland, meadows, pasture land, heaths, mires and wetlands can be preserved in towns and cities.

The concept of preserving a functioning biotope or ecosystem is of crucial importance in preserving the original vegetation. Preserved solitary trees are usually not included in the biotope concept, but can be studied as remnants of the original vegetation (Oguz, 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecology of Cities and Towns
A Comparative Approach
, pp. 380 - 398
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×