Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:39:07.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

François Lévêque
Affiliation:
Ecole des mines de Paris
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cour des Comptes, Les Coûts de la Filière Nucléaire (La Documentation Française, Paris, 2012)Google Scholar
Centre d’Analyse Stratégique, La Valeur Tutélaire du Carbone. Report by the committee chaired by Quinet, Alain (La Documentation Française, 2009)Google Scholar
The Economist (5 December 2009)
Ramsey, F. P., A mathematical theory of saving, Economic Journal, 38 (1928), pp. 543–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W., Global warming economics, Science, 294:5545 (2001), pp. 1283–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dasgupta, P., Comments on the Stern Review's Economics of Climate Change, National Institute Economics Review, 199 (2006), pp. 4–7Google Scholar
Gollier, C., Discounting an uncertain future, Journal of Public Economics, 85 (2002), pp. 149–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxera Consulting Ltd, A Social Time Preference Rate for Use in Long-Term Discounting (2002)
Lebègue, D., Révision du Taux d’Actualisation des Investissements Publics (Commissariat Général du Plan, 2005)Google Scholar
Gollier, C., Pricing the Planet's Future: The Economics of Discounting in an Uncertain World (Princeton University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
US Department of Energy, Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Fee Adequacy Assessment Report (2008)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Update of the MIT 2003 Future of Nuclear Power (2009)
Jaworowski, Z., The Chernobyl Disaster and How it has been Understood (2010)
OECD-IEA report, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity (2010)
Bertel, E. and Naudet, G., L'Economie du Nucléaire (EDP Sciences, Paris, 2004)Google Scholar
Du, Y. and Parsons, J., Update on the Cost of Nuclear Power (Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR) 09-004, 2009)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study (2003)
Lindman, A. and Söderholm, P., Wind power learning rates: a conceptual review and meta-analysis, Energy Economics, 34 (2012), pp. 754–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultman, N. E. and Koomey, J., A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear power plants 1970–2005, Energy Policy, 35 (2007), pp. 5630–42Google Scholar
Les Coûts de la Filière Nucléaire (La Documentation Française, Paris, 2012)
Bupp, I. C., Derian, J.-C., Donsimoni, M. P. and Treitel, R., The economics of nuclear power, Technology Review 77:4 (1975), pp. 14–25
Rothwell, G. S., Steam-electric scale economies and construction lead times, Social Science Working Paper, 627 (California Institute of Technology, 1986)Google Scholar
Cantor, R. and Hewlett, J., The economics of nuclear power: further evidence on learning, economies of scale and regulatory effects, Resources and Energy, 10:4 (December 1988), pp. 315–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M. B., Learning effects and the commercialization of new technologies: the case of nuclear power, The Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (1988), pp. 297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. W., Prospects for nuclear power, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26:1 (2012), pp. 49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paik, S. and Schriver, W. R., The effects of increased regulation on capital costs and manual labor requirements of nuclear power plants, The Engineering Economist, 26 (1979), pp. 223–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M., Policy Challenges of Nuclear Reactor Construction: Cost Escalation and Crowding Out Alternatives (Institute for Energy and the Environment, Vermont Law School, 2010)Google Scholar
Grubler, A., The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: a case of negative learning by doing, Energy Policy, 38 (2010), pp. 5174–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertel, E. and Naudet, G., L’Economie du Nucléaire (EDP Sciences, Paris, 2004)Google Scholar
Moynet, G., Evaluation du coût de l’électricité nucléaire en France au cours des dix dernières années, Revue Générale Nucléaire, 2 (1984), pp. 141–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Update of the MIT 2003 Future of Nuclear Power (2009)
Glachant, J.-M., Generation technology mix in competitive electricity markets, in Lévêque, F. (ed.), Electricity Reform in Europe: Towards a Single Energy Market (Edward Elgar Publishing, London, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupraz, B. and Joudon, L., Le développement de l’EPR dans le marché électrique européen, Revue Générale Nucléaire, 6 (2004)Google Scholar
Zaleski, P. C. and Méritet, S., Point de vue sur l’EPR, Contrôle, 164 (2005), pp. 51–6Google Scholar
Rosner, R. and Goldberg, S., Analysis of GW-scale Overnight Cost, Technical Report (University of Chicago, 2011)Google Scholar
Due, Yangbo and Parsons, J. E., Update on the Cost of Nuclear Power (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009)Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Reduction of Capital Costs of Nuclear Power Plants (2000)
Nemet, G. F., Demand-pull energy technology policies, diffusion and improvements in California wind power, in Foxon, T., Koehler, J. and Oughton, C. (eds.), Innovations for a Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2007)Google Scholar
Pouret, L. and Nuttall, W. J., Is nuclear power inflexible?, Nuclear Future, 5:6 (2009), pp. 333–41Google Scholar
Muller, N. Z., Mendelsohn, R. and Nordhaus, W., Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy, American Economic Review, 1001:5 (2011), pp. 1649–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, P. et al., Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219 (2011), pp. 73–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grausz, S., The Social Cost of Coal, Climate Advisers (2011)
Nuclear Energy Agency, The Financing of Nuclear Power Plants (2009)
Roques, F., Newbery, D. M. and Nuttall, W. J., Fuel mix diversification incentives in liberalized electricity markets: a mean-variance portfolio theory approach, Energy Economics, 30 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comptes, Cour des, Les Coûts de la Filière Nucléaire (La Documentation Française, Paris, 2012), p. 51Google Scholar
Joskow, P. L., Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies, American Economic Review, 101:3 (2011), pp. 238–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbery, D. M., Reforming competitive electricity markets to meet environmental targets, Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 1:1 (2012), pp. 69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambec, S. and Crampes, C., Electricity Production with Intermittent Source of Energy, Lerna Working Paper, University of Toulouse 10.07.313 (2010)
Lantz, E., Wiser, R. and Hand, M., IEA Wind Task 26: The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy, Work Package 2 (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2012)Google Scholar
Wiser, R. et al., Wind Energy, in IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Posner, R. A., Catastrophe: Risk and Response (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K., Rational Risk Policy (Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascucci-Cahen, L. and Momal, P., Les Rejets Radiologiques Massifs Different Profondément des Rejets Contrôlés (Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, 2012)Google Scholar
Versicherungsforen Leipzig, Calculating a Risk-Appropriate Insurance Premium to Cover Third-Party Liability Risks that Result from Operation of Nuclear Power Plants, commissioned by the German Renewable Energy Federation (2011)
Versicherungsforen Leipzig, Calculating a Risk-Appropriate Insurance Premium
Reactors, Residents and Risk, Nature News (2011)
The Chernobyl Forum, Chernobyl's Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts, second revised version (2005)
The costs of failure: a preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, Energy Policy (2008)
US National Regulatory Commission, Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in US Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-75/014) (1975)
Kendall, H. W., Hubbard, R. B. and Gregory, C. M. (eds.), Risks of Nuclear Power Reactors: a Review of the NRC Reactor Safety Study (1977)
Health and Safety Executive, Nuclear Directorate, Generic Design Assessment – New Civil Reactors Build (Step 3, Probabilistic Safety Analysis of the EDF and Areva UK EPR, Division 6, Assessment report no. AR 09/027-P) (2011)
Electric Power Research Institute, Safety and Operational Benefits of Risk-Informed Initiatives (White paper, 2008)
Keynes, J. M., A Treatise on Probability (Macmillan, London, 1921)Google Scholar
Morini, S., Bernard de Finetti: l’origine de son subjectivisme, Journal Electronique d’Histoire des Probabilités et de la Statistique, 3:2 (2007), pp. 1–16Google Scholar
Epstein, W., A PRA Practitioner Looks at the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami (Ninokata Laboratory White Paper, 2011)Google Scholar
Geller, R. J., Shake-up time for Japanese seismology, Nature, 472 (2011), pp. 407–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Nuclear Civil Engineering Committee, Tsunami Evaluation Subcommittee, Tsunami Assessment Method for Nuclear Power Plants in Japan (2002 guidelines)
Gilboa, I., Theory of Decision under Uncertainty (Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, 47 (1979), pp. 263–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5:4 (1992), pp. 297–323Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H., Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5:1 (1991), pp. 193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2011)Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichenstein, S., Facts and fears: societal perception of risk, Advances in Consumer Research, 8 (Association for Consumer Research, 1981), pp. 497–502Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K., Rational Risk Policy (Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddik, A. A. and Slovic, P., A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit, Risk Analysis, 14:6 (1994), pp. 1085–96Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, Comparing Nuclear Accident Risks with Those from Other Energy Sources (OECD, 2010)Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Dread Risks, September 11 and fatal traffic accidents, Psychological Science, 15:4 (2004), pp. 286–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harley, K., Why airport security is broken, The Wall Street Journal (15 April 2012)
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgements under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 46CrossRef
Kemp, C. and Tenenbaum, J. B., Structural statistical models of inductive reasoning, Psychological Review, 116 (2009), pp. 20–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenier, E., Introduction à la démarche Bayésienne sans formule mathématique, Modulab, 43 (2010–11)Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K., Rational Risk Policy (Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessus, B. and Laponche, B., Accident nucléaire: une certitude statistique, Libération, 5 June 2011
Ghys, E., Accident nucléaire: une certitude statistique, Images des Mathématiques (Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 2011)Google Scholar
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Individual Plant Examination Program: Perspectives on Reactor Safety and Plant Performance (NUREG-1560), Vol. 1−3 (1997)
Escobar-Rangel, L. and Lévêque, F., How Fukushima Daiichi core meltdown changed the probability of nuclear accidents, Safety Science, 64 (2014), pp. 90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévêque, F., Economie de la Réglementation (Collection Repères, Editions La Découverte, Paris, 2004)Google Scholar
des Comptes, Cour, Les Coûts de la Filière Nucléaire (La Documentation Française, Paris, 2012), pp. 62–70Google Scholar
Rees, J. V., Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of the Nuclear Industry Since 1980 (University of Chicago Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Rees, J., Industry self-regulation, Law and Policy, 4:19 (1997), pp. 363–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, R. A. and Trebilcock, M., The economics of nuclear accident law, International Review of Law and Economics, 17 (1997), pp. 225–43Google Scholar
Borre, T. Vanden, Shifts in governance in compensation for nuclear damage, 20 years after Chernobyl, in Faure, M. and Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage (Tort and Insurance Law, Vol. 21, Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
Dubin, J. A. and Rothwell, G. S., Subsidy to nuclear power through the Price-Anderson liability limit, Contemporary Policy Issues (1990), pp. 73–8
Heyes, A. G. and Liston-Heyes, C., Subsidy to nuclear power through the Price-Anderson liability limit: comment, Contemporary Economic Policy, 16 (1998), pp. 122–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congressional Budget Office, Nuclear Power's Role in Generating Electricity, (2008), pp. 28–9
Faure, M. G. and Fiore, K., An economic analysis of the nuclear liability subsidy, Pace Environmental Law Review, 26 (2009), pp. 419–47Google Scholar
Versicherungsforen Leipzig, Calculating a Risk-Appropriate Insurance Premium to Cover Third-Party Liability Risks that Result from Operation of Nuclear Power Plants, commissioned by the German Renewable Energy Federation (2011)Google Scholar
Leurs, B. A. and Wit, R. C. N., Environmentally Harmful Support Measures in EU Member States (CE Delft, January 2003)
Radetzki, M. and Radetzki, M., Private arrangements to cover large-scale liabilities caused by nuclear and other industrial catastrophes, The Geneva Papers on Risks and Insurance, 25 (2000), pp. 180–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huet, S., Nucléaire: Quel Scénario pour le Futur? (Collection 360, Editions La Ville Brûle, Montreuil, 2012), p. 132Google Scholar
Kingston, J., Power politics: Japan's resilient nuclear village, The Asia-Pacific Journal, 10 (2012)Google Scholar
Gundersen, A., The echo chamber: regulatory capture and the Fukushima Daiichi disaster, in Lessons from Fukushima (Greenpeace, 2012), pp. 41–9Google Scholar
Citizens Information Center, Revelation of endless N-damage cover-ups, Nuke Info Tokyo, 92 (2002)Google Scholar
Culture of Complicity Tied to Stricken Nuclear Plant, New York Times, 26 April 2011
Asahi Shimbun, 3 May 2011
Ramseyer, J. M. and Rasmusen, E. B., Why are Japanese judges so conservative in politically charged cases?, American Political Science, 95:2 (2001), pp. 331–44Google Scholar
Japanese officials ignored or concealed dangers, New York Times, 16 May 2011
Stigler, G. J., The theory of economic regulation, Bell Journal of Economic and Management Science, 2:1 (1971), pp. 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japan ignored nuclear risks, official says, New York Times, 15 February 2012
Lévêque, F., Economie de la Réglementation (Collection Repères, Editions La Découverte, Paris, 2004), p. 14Google Scholar
Paik, S. and Schriver, W. R., The effect of increased regulation on capital costs and manual labor requirements of nuclear power plants, The Engineering Economist, 1 (1980), pp. 223–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golay, M. W., Improved nuclear power plant operations and safety through performance-based safety regulation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1–3:71 (2000), pp. 219–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regulatory Guide 1.174, An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis (Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2002)
Meserve, R. A., The evolution of safety goals and their connections to safety culture, NRC News, S-01–013 (2001)Google Scholar
Apostolakis, G. E., How useful is quantitative risk assessment?, Risk Analysis, 24:3 (2004), pp. 515–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadak, A. C. and Matsuo, T., The nuclear industry's transition to risk-informed regulation and operation in the United States, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92 (2007), pp. 609–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK Health and Safety Executive, Office of Nuclear Regulation, Numerical Targets and Legal Limits in Safety Assessment Principles for Nuclear Facilities (2006)
Rolina, G., in Sûreté Nucléaire et Facteurs Humains, La Fabrique Française de l’Expertise (Presse des Mines, Paris, 2009), p. 37Google Scholar
Groupe Permanent d’Experts pour les Réacteurs Nucléaires, Directives Techniques pour la Conception et la Construction de la Nouvelle Génération de Réacteurs Nucléaires à Eau Sous Pression (2000)
Farmer, F., Siting criteria, a new approach, in Containment and Siting of Nuclear Power Plants (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1967), pp. 303–29Google Scholar
Hecht, G., Le Rayonnement de la France (Collection Textes à l’appui, Editions La Découverte, Paris, 2004)Google Scholar
Simonnot, P., Les Nucléocrates (Collection Capitalisme et Survie, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1978)Google Scholar
Beltran, A., Picard, J.-F. and Bungener, M., Histoire(s) de l’EDF, comment se sont prises les decisions de 1946 à nos jours (Editions Dunod, Paris, 1985)Google Scholar
Guillaumat, Pierre, La Passion des Grands Projets Industriels (Editions Rive Droite, Paris, 1995)Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E., Special Interest Politics (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001)Google Scholar
MacAvoy, P. W. and Rosenthal, J. W., Corporate Profit and Nuclear Safety: Strategy at Northeast Utilities in the 1990s (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2005)Google Scholar
Mainichi Shinbun, 7 March 2012
La Porte, T. R. and Thomas, C. W., Regulatory compliance and the ethos of quality enhancement: surprises in nuclear power plant operations, Journal of Public and Administration Research and Theory, 5:1 (1995), pp. 109–37Google Scholar
Löfstedt, E. and Vogel, D., The changing of regulations: a comparison of Europe and the United States, Risk Analysis, 21:3 (2001), pp. 399–405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meserve, R., International Atomic Energy Agency Bulletin, 49/1 (2007)
Labbé, M-H., Le Nucléaire à la Croisée des Chemins (La Documentation française, Paris, 1999)Google Scholar
Chernus, Ira, Eisenhower's Atoms for Peace (Texas A&M University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Thomas, S. D., The Realities of Nuclear Power: International Economic and Regulatory Experience (Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Finon, D. and Staropoli, C., Institutional and technological co-evolution in the French electronuclear industry, Industry and Innovation, 8 (2001), pp. 179–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, G., Le Rayonnement de la France (Collection Textes à l’Appui, Editions La Découverte, Paris, 2004), p. 261Google Scholar
Bataille, Christian and Galley, Robert, Rapport sur l’aval du cycle nucléaire, volume 2: Les coûts de production de l’électricité, ch. 1, sect. II (Rapport de l’office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques, 1999)
Goldemberg, J., Nuclear energy in developing countries, Daedalus (2009), pp. 71–80
Keppler, J. H., The economic costs of the nuclear phase-out in Germany, NEA News, 30 (2012), pp. 8–14Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. S., Nuclear power and EU enlargement: the case of Temelin, Environmental Politics, 13 (2004), pp. 153–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. S., The European Commission and Member States: conflict over nuclear safety, Perspectives, 13 (2004), pp. 153–72Google Scholar
Scheinman, L., Euratom: Nuclear Integration in Europe (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York, 1967)Google Scholar
Désaccord européen sur les stress tests nucléaires, Le Monde (12 May 2011)
Andoura, S., Hancher, L., and Van Der Woude, M., Vers une Communauté européenne de l’énergie: un projet politique (Notre Europe, Etudes et Recherches 76, 2010)Google Scholar
Delors, J. et al., L’Europe de l’énergie c’est maintenant, Le Monde (25 May 2013)
Laiidi, Z. and Montes Torralba, R., Les Conditions de Mise en Oeuvre de la Solidarité Energétique Européenne (funded by Conseil Français de l’Energie, Centre d'études européennes de Sciences Po, Paris, 2012)Google Scholar
Miller, S. E. and Sagan, S. D., Nuclear power without nuclear proliferation?Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 138:4 (2009), pp. 7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroenig, M., Gartzke, E. and Rauchhaus, R. (eds.), Causes and Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation (Routledge Global Security Studies, Routledge, Abingdon, UK, 2011)
Cohen, B. L., The Nuclear Energy Option (Plenum Press, New York, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piram, K., Stratégies gouvernementales pour le développement de l’énergie nucléaire civile: pratiques françaises et américaines sur le marché des centrales nucléaires, Cahier Thucydide, 8 (2009)Google Scholar
Finon, D., La Recomposition de l’Industrie Nucléaire Française est-elle Nécessaire? (Document de travail du CIRED, Paris, 2011)Google Scholar
Chevalier, F. and Park, K., The winning strategy of the late-comer: how Korea was awarded the UAE nuclear power contract, International Review of Business Research Papers, 6 (2010), pp. 221–38Google Scholar
Glasgow, J. A., Teplinsky, E. and Markus, S. L., Nuclear Export Control: A Comparative Analysis of National Regimes for the Control of Nuclear Materials, Components and Technology (Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington DC, 2012)Google Scholar
Varnum, J. C., US nuclear cooperation as nonproliferation: reforms, or the devil you know?, The Nuclear Threat Initiative (2012)
Albright, D., Holding Khan accountable, an Isis statement accompanying Release of Libya: a Major Sale at Last, Institute for Science and International Security (2010)
Hibbs, M., How North Korea built its nuclear program, The Atlantic (10 April 2013)
Hibbs, M., The future of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2011)
McGoldrick, F., Limiting Transfers of Enrichment and Reprocessing Technology: Issues, Constraints, Options (Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School, 2011)Google Scholar
Thränert, Oliver and Bieri, Matthias, The Nuclear Suppliers Group at the Crossroads (CSS Analysis, 127, Center for Security Studies, 2013)
Hibbs, M., Anthony, I., Ahlström, C. and Fedchenko, V., Reforming Nuclear Export Controls: The Future of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (SIPRI Research Report 22, Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×