Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2010
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Economics of Information TechnologyAn Introduction, pp. 87 - 96Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Alessandro Acquisti and Hal R. Varian, 2001. Conditioning prices on purchase history. Technical report, School of Information Management, University of California at Berkeley
and , 1976. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90 (3): 475–498Google Scholar
, 1999. Price discrimination by a many-product firm. Review of Economic Studies, 66 (1): 151–168Google Scholar
and , 2001. Competitive price discrimination. RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (4): 579–605; http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/economics/people/armstrong/markpapers.htmlGoogle Scholar
, 1991. The failure of competition in the credit card market. American Economic Review, 81 (1): 50–81Google Scholar
Charles Babcock, 2001. Will open source get snagged in .NET? ZDNet News, 6 August; http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2801560,00.html
Mark Bagnoli and Ted Bergstrom, 1989. Log-concave probability and its application. Unpublished working paper; http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Theory/delta.pdf
G. Baker and T. Hubbard, 2000. Contractibility and asset ownership: Computers and governance in the US trucking industry. Technical Report 7634, National Bureau of Economic Research
and , 1999. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits and efficiency. Management Science, 45 (12): 1613–1630Google Scholar
and , 2000. Bundling and competition on the Internet: Aggregation strategies for information goods. Marketing Science, 19 (1): 63–82; http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/Google Scholar
Yannis Bakos and Erik Brynjolfsson, 2001. Aggregation and disaggregation of information goods: Implications for bundling, site licensing and micropayment systems. In Brian Kahin and Hal R. Varian, eds., Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/
M. Baye and John Morgan, 2001. Price dispersion in the lab and on the Internet: Theory and evidence. Technical report, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University; http://www.princeton.edu/~rjmorgan/working.htm
M. Baye, J. Morgan, and P. Scholten, 2001. Price dispersion in the small and in the large: Evidence from an Internet price comparison site. Technical report, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University; http://www.princeton.edu/~rjmorgan/working.htm
and , 1992. Multi-period competition with switching costs. Econometrica, 60 (3): 651–666Google Scholar
and , 1994. Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (2): 117–131Google Scholar
Robert Boynton, 2004. The tyranny of copyright. New York Times Magazine, 25 January
Adam M. Brandenburger and Barry J. Nalebuff, 1996. Co-opetition. Doubleday, New York
and , 1995. General Purpose Technologies: Engines of growth?Journal of Econometrics, 65 (1): 83–108Google Scholar
Gerald Brock, 1981. The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
and , 2000. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (4): 23–48Google Scholar
and , 1999. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46 (4): 563–585; http://ebusiness.mit.edu/erik/Google Scholar
Nicholas G. Carr, 2003. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, May
Nicholas G. Carr, 2004. Does IT Matter? Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Pei-Yu (Sharon) Chen and Lorin M. Hitt, 2001. Measuring the determinants of switching costs: A study of the on-line brokerage industry. Technical report, Wharton School
Clayton Christensen, 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Wesley M. Cohen and Stephen A. Merrill, eds., 2004. Patents in the Knowledge Based Economy, Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council of the National Academies of Science, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Wesley Cohen, Richard Nelson, and John Walsh, 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7552
Augustin Cournot, 1838. Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Hachette, Paris
J. Dana and K. Spier, 2000. Revenue sharing, demand uncertainty, and control of competing firms. Technical report, Northwestern University
, 1990. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review, 80: 355–361Google Scholar
J. Bradford Delong and A. Michael Froomkin, 2001. Speculative microeconomics for tomorrow's economy. In Brian Kahin and Hal R. Varian, eds., Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; http://www.j-bradford/delong.net/OpEd/virtual/technet/spmicro.html
and , 1996. Damaged goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 5 (2): 149–174Google Scholar
David Dranove and Neil Gandal, 2000. The DVD vs. DIVX standard war: Empirical evidence of vaporware. Technical Report CPC00–16, University of California at Berkeley
Phred Dvorak, Nick Wingfield, and Sarah McBride, 2004. Technology titans battle over format of DVD successor. Wall Street Journal, 15 March
, 1996. The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16 (4): 673–699; http://raven.stern.nyu.edu/networks/Google Scholar
Nicholas Economides and Charles Himmelberg, 1995. Critical mass and network size with application to the US fax market. Technical report, Stern School of Business, New York University; http://raven.stern.nyu.edu/networks/papers.html
Glenn Ellison and Sara Fisher Ellison, 2001. Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. Technical report, Department of Economics, MIT
Joseph Farrell and Paul Klemperer, 2003. Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. In Mark Armstrong and Rob Porter, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. III. Amsterdam, North-Holland; http://www.paulklemperer.org
and 2004. Incentives to challenge and defend patents. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
and , 1992. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. Journal of Industrial Economics, March: 9–35Google Scholar
and , 1988. Dynamic competition with switching costs. Rand Journal of Economics, 19: 123–137Google Scholar
and , 2003. Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Towards a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the internet age. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 17 (1): 85–135Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission, 2003. To promote innovation: The proper balance of competition and patent law and policy; http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/10/cpreport.htm
and , 1985. Preemption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Review of Economic Studies, 52: 383–402Google Scholar
and , 1987. Understanding rent dissipation: On the uses of game theory in industrial organization. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 77: 176–183Google Scholar
and , 1998. Upgrades, trade-ins, and buy-backs. Rand Journal of Economics, 29: 238–258Google Scholar
and , 2000. Customer poaching and brand switching. Rand Journal of Economics, 31: 634–657Google Scholar
, 2002. The economics of patents: Lessons from recent US patent reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (2): 131–154Google Scholar
Nancy Gallini and Suzanne Scotchmer, 2001. Intellectual property: When is it the best incentive system? In Adam Jaffe, Joshua Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. II. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
and , 2001. An economist's guide to US v. Microsoft. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2): 25–44Google Scholar
S. Colum Gilfillan, 1935. Inventing the Ship. Follett, Chicago
Austan Goolsbee and Peter J. Klenow, 2000. Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. Technical report, University of Chicago; http://gsbadg.uchicago.edu/vitae.htm
, 2000. Does the “New Economy” measure up to the great inventions of the past?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (4): 49–74Google Scholar
Amy R. Greenwald and Jeffrey O. Kephart, 1999. Shopbots and pricebots. Technical report, IBM Watson Labs; http://www.research.ibm.com/infoecon/paps/html/amec99_shopbot/shopbot.html
, 1998. The original WWW: Web lessons from the early days of radio. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12 (3): 46–56; http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/issuetoc?ID=79208Google Scholar
E. Helpman, 1998. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
and , 1989. Politically contestable rents and transfers. Economics and Politics, 1: 17–39Google Scholar
David A. Hounshell, 1984. From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
, 2000. The demand for monitoring technologies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, May: 533–560Google Scholar
Maarten C. W. Janssen and José Luis Moraga-González, 2001. Two firms is enough for competition, but three or more is better. Technical report, Rotterdam University
Matthew Josephson, 1959. Edison: A Biography. McGraw-Hill, New York
and , 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75 (3): 424–440Google Scholar
and , 1986a. Product compatibility choice in a market with technological progress. Oxford Economic Papers, 38 (Special Issue on the New Industrial Economics): 146–165Google Scholar
and , 1986b. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (4): 822–884Google Scholar
and , 1992. Product introduction with network externalities. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40: 55–84Google Scholar
and , 1994. Systems competition and network effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (2): 93–115Google Scholar
Stuart Kauffman, 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
, , and , 2003. Estimating switching costs: The case of banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12 (1): 25–56Google Scholar
, 2001. The Microsoft case: What can a dominant firm do to defend its market position?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2): 45–62Google Scholar
, 1987. Markets with consumer switching costs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (2): 375–394Google Scholar
, 1989. Price wars caused by switching costs. Review of Economic Studies, 56 (3): 405–420Google Scholar
, 1995. Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62: 515–539; http://www.paulklemperer.org/index.htmGoogle Scholar
and , 1998. Stronger protection or technological revolution: What is behind the recent surge in patenting?Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48: 247–304Google Scholar
Alex Kuczynski, 2001. Big magazines get bigger as small ones get gobbled up. New York Times, 30 July; http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/30/business/30MAG.html?pagewanted=print
, 2001. Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwestern University Law Review, 95: 1495–1532; http://repositories.cdlib.org/blewp/19Google Scholar
, 2002. Intellectual property rights and standard-setting organization. California Law Review, 90: 1889–1980; available at www.ssrn.comGoogle Scholar
Lawrence Lessig, 2001. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. Random House, New York
, , , and , 1987. “Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783–820Google Scholar
Martin Libicki, James Schneider, Dave R. Frelinger, and Ann Slomovic, 2000. Scaffolding the New Web: Standards and Standards Policy for the Digital Economy. RAND, Santa Monica; http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1215/
Robert Litan and Alice Rivlin, 2001. The Economic Payoff from the Internet Revolution. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
Robert Litan and Hal Varian, 2001. The netimpact study. Technical report, University of California at Berkeley, http://www.netimpactstudy.com
and , 1986. Free entry and social inefficiency. Rand Journal of Economics, 17 (1): 48–58Google Scholar
Charles Mann, 1998. Who will own your next good idea? The Atlantic Online, September; http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/98sep/copy.htm
Peter Menell, 2000. Intellectual property: General theories. In Boudewijn Bouckaert and Gerrit de Gees, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
, 2003. Envisioning copyright law's digital future. New York Law School Law Review, 46: 63–109Google Scholar
, 1999. As many as six impossible patents before breakfast: property rights for business concepts and patent system reform. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14 (2): 577–615Google Scholar
Judith Holland Mortimer, 2001. The effects of revenue-sharing contracts on welfare in vertically separated markets: Evidence from the video rental industry. Technical report, Economics Department, Harvard University
Barry Nalebuff, 1999. Bundling. Technical Report 99–14, School of Management, Yale University
Barry Nalebuff, 2000. Competing against bundles. Technical Report 00–7, School of Management, Yale University
National Research Council, 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century, ed. Stephen A. Merrill, Richard C. Levin, and Mark B. Myers. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council of the National Academies of Science, Washington, DC
, 1971. A Disneyland dilemma: Two-part tariffs for a Mickey Mouse monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 85: 77–96Google Scholar
Jennifer Reinganum, 1989. The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. In R. Schmalensee and R. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization. North-Holland, Amsterdam
John G. Riley, 1999. Asymmetric contests: A resolution of the Tullock paradox. In Peter Howitt, Elisabetta De Antoni, and Axel Leijonhufvud, eds., Money, Markets and Method: Essays in Honor of Robert W. Clower. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham; http://www.econ.ucla.edu/riley/research/
, 1974. A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell Journal of Economics, 5 (1): 16–37Google Scholar
Jeffrey Rohlfs 2001. Bandwagon Effects in High-Technology Industries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
, 2001. Black ink all over Hewlett-Packard. Business Week, 22 January; http://www.businessweek.com/@@8zC3j2QQgISnLgEA/premium/content/01_22/Google Scholar
Linda Rosencrance, 2000. Amazon charging different prices on some DVDs. Computerworld, 5 September; http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO49569,00.html
, 1989. When is inducing self-selection suboptimal for a monopolist?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104 (2): 391–397Google Scholar
Pamela Samuelson, 2003. DRM {and, or, vs.} the law. Communications of the ACM, April: 41–45; http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers.html
Pamela Samuelson, 2004. Legally speaking: Why reform the US patent system? Unpublished paper; http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers.html
and , 2002. The law and economics of reverse engineering. Yale Law Journal, 111: 1575–1663Google Scholar
Pamela Samuelson and Hal R. Varian, 2002. The “New Economy” and information technology policy. In Jeffrey Frankle, ed., Economic Policy During the Clinton Administration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal
, 1981a. Monopolistic two-part tariff arrangements. Bell Journal of Economics, 12: 445–466Google Scholar
, 1981b. Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. American Economic Review, 71: 242–247Google Scholar
Joseph Schumpeter, 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Joseph Schumpeter, 2000. The analysis of economic change. In Richard V. Clemence, ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles and the Evolution of Capitalism. Transaction Books, New Brunswick, pp. 134–149. Originally published in Review of Economic Statistics, May 1935
Carl Shapiro, 2000. Competition policy in the information economy. In Einar Hope, ed., Foundations of Competition Policy Analysis, vol. XXV. Routledge, New York
Carl Shapiro, 2001a. Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting. In Adam Jaffe, Joshua Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. II. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Carl Shapiro, 2001b. Navigating the patent thicket. In Adam Jaffe, Joshua Lerner, and Scott Stern, eds., Innovation Policy and the Economy, National Bureau of Economics, Washington, DC; http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro
Carl Shapiro, 2004. Patent system reform: economic analysis and critique. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, forthcoming; http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro
Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian, 1998a. Information Rules. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA; http://www.inforules.com
Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian, 1998b. Versioning: The smart way to sell information. Harvard Business Review, November–December: 106–114
Oz Shy, 2001. The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Susan Smulyan, 1994. Selling Radio: The Commercialization of American Broadcasting. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC
Charles Steindel and Kevin J. Stiroh, 2001. Productivity: What is it and why do we care? Technical report, New York Federal Reserve Bank; http://www.ny.frb.org/rmaghome/staffrp/2001/sr122.pdf
Kevin Stiroh, 2001. Information technology and the US productivity revival: What do the industry data say? Technical report, New York Federal Reserve Bank; http://www.ny.frb.org/rmaghome/staff_rp/2001/sr115.html
, 1979. Intertemporal price discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93: 355–371Google Scholar
, 1954. Intercompany technical standardization in the early American automobile industry. Journal of Economic History, 14 (1): 1–20Google Scholar
David Ulph and Nir Vulkan, 2000. Electronic commerce and competitive first-degree price discrimination. Technical report, University College, London; http://www.ecn.bris.ac.uk/www/ecnv/welcome.htm
David Ulph and Nir Vulkan, 2001. E-commerce, mass customization and price discrimination. Technical report, University College, London; http://www.ecn.bris.ac.uk/www/ecnv/welcome.htm
Abbott Usher, 1954. A History of Mechanical Invention. Dover, Cambridge, MA
, 1985. Price discrimination and social welfare. American Economic Review, 75 (4): 870–875Google Scholar
Hal R. Varian, 1997. Economic aspects of personal privacy. In Larry Irving, ed., Privacy and Self-Regulation in the Information Age. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, DC; http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/privacy/privacy_rpt.htm
, 2000. Buying, sharing and renting information goods. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48 (4): 473–488Google Scholar
Hal R. Varian, 2001. Versioning information goods. In Brian Kahin and Hal R. Varian, eds., Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/people/hal/papers.html
Hal R. Varian and Carl Shapiro, 2003. Linux adoption in the public sector: An economic analysis. Unpublished paper; http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2004/linux-adoption-in-the-public-sector.pdf
Brian Viard, 2003. Do switching costs make markets more or less competitive: The case of 800-number portability. Unpublished paper, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University; http://faculty-gsb.stanford.edu/viard/Personal/PDF/port.pdf
, 1999. Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND Journal of Economics, 30 (4): 604–631Google Scholar
J. Miguel Villas-Boas 2001. Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. Technical report, Hass School of Business, University of California at Berkeley
Nir Vulkan, 2003. The Economics of E-Commerce: A Strategic Guide to Understanding and Designing the Online Marketplace. Princeton University Press, Princeton
, 2001. Exclusivity and tying in US v. Microsoft: What we know, and don't know. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2): 63–80Google Scholar