Bibliography

Harald Gruber

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493256.010

ACA, 2000. ‘Telecommunications Performance Report 1999–2000’, Australian Communications Agency

AGCM, 2001. ‘Gara UMTS’, Provvedimento n. 1445 of 27 June 2001, Rome: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza (Italian Competition Authority)

Ahn, H. and Lee, M., 1999. ‘An econometric analysis of the demand for access to mobile telephone networks’, Information Economics and Policy, 11: 297–305CrossRef Google Scholar

Appleby, M. S., 1991. ‘The UK cellular system’, in Macario, R. C. V. (ed.), Personal and Mobile Radio Systems, London: Peter PeregrinusGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, M., 1997. ‘A simple model of competition in mobile telephony’, London Business School, mimeo

Armstrong, M. 1998. ‘Network interconnection in telecommunications’, Economic Journal, 108: 545–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Armstrong, M.2002. ‘The theory of access pricing and interconnection’, in Cave, M., Majumdar, S. K. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, 1, Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, M., Cowan, S. and Vickers, J., 1994. Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, M. and Vickers, J., 1999. ‘Competitive price discrimination’, Oxford University, mimeo

Arthur, W. B., 1989. ‘Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events’, Economic Journal, 99: 116–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Artis, M. and Nixson, F., 2001. The Economics of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. and Barnekov, C. C., 2000. ‘A competitively neutral approach to network interconnection’, Federal Communications Commission (US), OPP Working Paper Series, 34

Ausubel, L. M. and Cramton, P., 1996. ‘Demand reduction and inefficiency in multi-unit auctions’, University of Maryland, mimeo

Ausubel, L. M., Cramton, P., McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J., 1997. ‘Synergies in wireless telephony: evidence from the broadband PCS auctions’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6: 497–527CrossRef Google Scholar

Ayres, I. and Cramton, P., 1996. ‘Deficit reduction through diversity: a case study of how affirmative action at the Federal Communications Commission (US) increased auction competition’, Stanford Law Review, 48: 761–815CrossRef Google Scholar

Bass, F. M., 1969. ‘A new product model for consumer durables’, Management Science, 15: 215–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Bekkers, R. and Smits, J., 1997. Mobile Telecommunications: Standards, Regulation and Applications, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Berlage, M. and Schnöring, T., 1995. ‘The introduction of competition in German mobile communication markets’, in Schenk, K. E., Müller, J. and Schnöring, T. (eds.), Mobile Telecommunications: Emerging European Markets, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Bewley, R. and Fiebig, D. G., 1988. ‘A flexible logistic growth model with applications in telecommunications’, International Journal of Forecasting, 4: 177–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Binmore, K. and Klemperer, P., 2002. ‘The biggest auction ever: the sale of the British 3G licenses’, Economic Journal, 112: 74–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Björkdahl, J. and Bohlin, E., 2004. ‘Competition policy and scenarios for European 3G markets’, Communications and Strategies, 51: 21–34Google Scholar

Blackstone, E. and Ware, H., 1978. ‘The cost of systems at 900 MHz’, in Bowers, R., Lee, M. A. and Hershey, C. (eds.), Communications for a Mobile Society: An Assessment of New Technology, Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

Bonanno, G., 1985. ‘Topics in oligoply’, unpublished PhD thesis, London School of Economics

Börgers, T. and Dustmann, C., 2001. ‘Strange bids: bidding behaviour in the United Kingdom's third generation spectrum auction’, University College London, mimeo

Börgers, T. and Dustmann, C.2002 ‘Rationalising the UMTS spectrum bids: the case of the UK auction’, University College London, mimeo

Brock, G. W., 2002. ‘Historical overview’, in Cave, M., Majumdar, S. K. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, 1, Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Brynjolfson, E. and Kemerer, C., 1996. ‘Network externalities in microcomputer software: an econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market’, Management Science, 42: 1627–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Budd, C., Harris, C. and Vickers, J. S., 1993. ‘A model of the evolution of duopoly: does the asymmetry between firms tend to increase or decrease?’, Review of Economic Studies, 60: 543–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Buehler, S. and Haucap, J., 2003. ‘Mobile number portability’, Discussion Paper, 17, University of Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg

Busse, M. R., 2000. ‘Multimarket contact and price coordination in the cellular telephone industry’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 9: 287–320CrossRef Google Scholar

Bylinsky, G., 1973. ‘How Intel won its bet on memory chips’, Fortune, November: 142–86Google Scholar

Cadima, N. and Pita Barros, P. L., 1998. ‘The impact of mobile phone diffusion on the fixed line network’, CEPR Working Paper, 2598, October

Calhoun, G., 1988. Digital Cellular Radio, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Cambini, C., Ravazzi, P. and Valletti, T., 2003. Il mercato delle telecomunicazioni: dal monopolio alla liberalizzazione negli Stati Uniti e nella Unione Europea, Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar

Cave, M. and Williamson, P., 1994. ‘Entry, competition, and regulation in UK telecommunications’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12: 113–27Google Scholar

Chakravorti, B., Sharkey, W. W., Spiegel, J. and Wilkie, S., 1995. ‘Auctioning the airwaves: the contest for broadband PCS spectrum’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 4: 345–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Chow, G., 1967. ‘Technological change and the demand for computers’, American Economic Review, 57: 1117–30Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., 1959. ‘The Federal Communications Commission’, Journal of Law and Economics, 2: 1–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Competition Commission, 2003. Report on Charges Made by Mobile Operators for Terminating Calls, London: HMSO

Cortada, J. W., 1987. Historical Dictionary of Data Processing: Technology, New York: Greenwood PressGoogle Scholar

Cramton, P., 1995. ‘Money out of thin air: the nationwide narrowband PCS auction’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 4: 267–343CrossRef Google Scholar

Cramton, P. 1997. ‘The Federal Communications Commission (US) spectrum auction: an early assessment’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6: 431–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Cramton, P. 2001. ‘Lessons learned from the UK 3G spectrum auction’, in National Audit Office, The Auction of Radio Spectrum for the Third Generation of Mobile Telephones, London: NAOGoogle Scholar

Cramton, P.2002. ‘Spectrum auctions’, in Cave, M., Majumdar, S. K. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, 1, Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Cramton, P. and Schwartz, J. A., 2000. ‘Collusive bidding: lessons from Federal Communications Commission (US) spectrum auctions’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17: 229–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Crandall, R. W., 1998. ‘New Zealand spectrum policy: a model for the United States?’, Journal of Law and Economics, 41: 821–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M. and Turpin, E., 1996. ‘Competition in access technologies’, Working Paper, DT 60, IDEI, Université de Toulouse

Curwen, P., 2002. The Future of Mobile Communications: Awaiting the Third Generation, Basingstoke: PalgraveCrossRef Google Scholar

Dana, J. D. and Spier, K. E., 1994. ‘Designing a private industry: government auctions with endogenous market structure’, Journal of Public Economics, 53: 127–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Davies, S., 1979. The Diffusion of Process Innovations, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Dayem, R. A., 1997. PCS and Digital Cellular Technologies: Assessing your Options, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

DeGraba, P., 2000. ‘Bill and keep at the central office as the efficient interconnection regime’, Federal Communications Commission (US), OPP Working Paper Series, 33

DeGraba, P.2002. ‘Efficient inter-carrier compensation for competing networks when customers share the value of a call’, FTC, mimeo

Dekimpe, M. G., Parker, P. M. and Sarvary, M., 1998. ‘Staged estimation of international diffusion models: an application to global cellular telephone adoption’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57: 105–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Didier, M. and Lorenzi, J.-H., 2002. Enjeux economiques de l'UMTS, Paris: La Documentation FrançaiseGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R., 1980. ‘Hybrid corn revisited’, Econometrica, 48: 1451–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Doyle, C. and Smith, J. C., 1998. ‘Market structure in mobile telecoms: qualified indirect access and the receiver pays principle’, Information Economics and Policy, 10: 471–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, 2002. ‘European mobile operators: mixed signals’, Research Report, June

Duso, T., 2000. ‘Who decides to regulate? Lobbying activity in the US cellular industry’, WZB Discussion Paper, FS IV 00–05

Economic Commission for Europe, 1987. The Telecommunications Industry: Growth and Structural Change, New York: United Nations

Economides, N., 1996. ‘The economics of networks’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14: 673–99CrossRef Google Scholar

European Commission, 1994. ‘Towards the personal communications environment: Green Paper on a common approach in the field of mobile and personal communications’, COM(94) 145 final

European Commission1997a. ‘On the further development of mobile and wireless communications’, COM(97) 217 final

European Commission1997b. ‘3rd implementation report of the telecommunications regulatory package’, COM(1997) 80 final

European Commission2000. ‘On the initial findings of the sector inquiry into mobile roaming charges’, Working Document, DG Competition, 13 December

European Commission2001. ‘The introduction of 3G mobile communications in the EU: state of play and the way forward’, COM(2001) 141 final

European Commission2002a. ‘Comparative assessment of the licensing regimes for 3G mobile communications in the European Union and their impact on the mobile communications sector’, Final Report, June

European Commission2002b. ‘Towards the full roll-out of third generation mobile communications’, COM(2002) 301 final

European Commission2002c. ‘8th implementation report of the telecommunications regulatory package’, COM(2002) 695 final

Ewerhard, C. and Moldovanu, B., 2002. ‘A stylised model of the German UMTS auction’, University of Mannheim, mimeo

Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., 1985. ‘Standardization, compatibility, and innovation’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 16: 70–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. 1986. ‘Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements, and predation’, American Economic Review, 76: 940–55Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Shapiro, C., 1992. ‘Standard setting in high-definition television’, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 1–77Google Scholar

Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission (US)), 1995. ‘First annual report and analysis of competitive market conditions with respect to commercial mobile services’, Federal Communications Commission (US) 95–319, Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission

Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission (US))1997. ‘The Federal Communications Commission (US) report to Congress on spectrum auctions’, Federal Communications Commission (US) Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, WT Docket, 97–150

Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission (US))2000. ‘Fifth annual report and analysis of competitive market conditions with respect to commercial mobile services’, Federal Communications Commission (US) 00–289, Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission

Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission (US))2003. ‘Eighth annual report and analysis of competitive market conditions with respect to commercial mobile services’, Federal Communications Commission (US) 03–150, Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission

Foreman, R. D. and Beauvais, E., 1999. ‘Scale economies in cellular telephony: size matters’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 16: 297–306CrossRef Google Scholar

Frey, J. and Lee, A. M., 1978. ‘Technologies for land mobile communications: 900 MHz systems’, in Bowers, R., Lee, A. M. and Hershey, C. (eds.), Communications for a Mobile Society, Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

Funk, J. L., 1998. ‘Competition between regional standards and the success and failure of firms in the worldwide mobile communications market’, Telecommunications Policy, 22: 419–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Funk, J. L. 2002. Global Competition between and within Standards: The Case of Mobile Phones, Basingstoke: PalgraveCrossRef Google Scholar

Gabszewicz, J. J. and Thisse, J. F., 1979. ‘Price competition, quality and income disparities’, Journal of Economic Theory, 20: 340–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Gabszewicz, J. J. and Thisse, J. F. 1980. Entry (and exit) in a differentiated industry’, Journal of Economic Theory, 22: 327–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Gandal, N., 1994. ‘Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities’, RAND Journal of Economics, 25: 160–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Gandal, N. 2002. ‘Compatibility, standardisation and network effects: some policy implications’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18: 80–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Gans, J. S. and King, S. P., 1999. ‘Termination charges for mobile phone networks: competitive analysis and regulatory options’, University of Melbourne, mimeo

Gans, J. S. and King, S. P. 2000. ‘Mobile network competition, customer ignorance, and fixed-to-mobile call prices’, Information Economics and Policy, 12: 301–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Gans, J. S., King, S. P. and Woodbridge, G., 2001. ‘Numbers to the people’, Information Economics and Policy, 13, 167–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Garg, V. K. and Wilkes, J. E., 1996. Wireless and Personal Communications Systems, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Garrard, G. A., 1998. Cellular Communications: Worldwide Market Developments, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Gerardin, D. and Kerf, M., 2003. Controlling Market Power in Telecommunications: Antitrust vs. Sector-specific Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Geroski, P., 2000. ‘Models of technology diffusion’, Research Policy, 29: 603–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Geroski, P., Thomson, D. and Tooker, S., 1989. ‘Vertical separation and price discrimination: cellular phones in the UK’, Fiscal Studies, 10: 83–103CrossRef Google Scholar

Griliches, Z., 1957. ‘Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technical change’, Econometrica, 25: 501–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Grimm, V., Riedel, F. and Wolfstetter, E., 2001. ‘The third generation (UMTS) spectrum auction in Germany’, CESifo Working Paper, 584

Grimm, V., Riedel, F. and Wolfstetter, E.2002. ‘Low price equilibrium in multi-unit auctions: the Global system for mobile communications (formerly Groupe système mobile) spectrum auction in Germany’, Humboldt Universität, Berlin, mimeo

Grimm, V., Riedel, F. and Wolfstetter, E. 2003. ‘Implementing efficient market structure: optimal licensing in natural oligopoly when tax revenue matters’, Review of Economic Design, 7: 443–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Grindley, P., 1995. Standards, Strategy and Policy: Cases and Stories, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Gruber, H., 1994. Learning and Strategic Product Innovation: Theory and Evidence for the Semiconductor Industry, Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Gruber, H. 1998. ‘The diffusion of innovations in protected industries: the textile industry’, Applied Economics, 30: 77–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruber, H. 1999. ‘An investment view of mobile telecommunications in the European Union’, Telecommunications Policy, 23: 521–38CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruber, H. 2001. ‘Competition and innovation: the diffusion of mobile telecommunications in Central and Eastern Europe’, Information Economics and Policy, 13: 19–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruber, H. 2002. ‘Endogenous sunk costs in the market for mobile telecommunications: the role of licence fees’, The Economic and Social Review, 33: 55–64Google Scholar

Gruber, H.2004. ‘Radio spectrum fees as determinants of market structure: the consequences of European 3G licensing’, in Soete, L. and Weel, B. (eds.), The Economics of the Digital Economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Gruber, H. and Hoenicke, M., 1998. ‘The European mobile telecommunications market’, European Investment Bank, mimeo

Gruber, H. and Hoenicke, M. 1999. ‘The road toward third generation mobile telecommunications’, Info, 3: 213–24Google Scholar

Gruber, H. and Hoenicke, M. 2000. ‘Third generation mobile. what are the challenges ahead?’, Communications and Strategies, 39: 159–73Google Scholar

Gruber, H. and Valletti, T., 2003. ‘Mobile telecommunications and regulatory frameworks’, in Madden, G. and Savage, S. (eds.), The International Handbook of Telecommunication Economics, II: Emerging Telecommunications Networks, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Gruber, H. and Verboven, F., 2001a. ‘The diffusion of mobile telecommunications services in the European Union’, European Economic Review, 45: 577–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Gruber, H. and Verboven, F. 2001b. ‘The evolution of markets under entry and standards regulation – the case of global mobile telecommunications’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 19: 1189–1212CrossRef Google Scholar

Guerci, C. M., Cervigni, G., Marcolongo, G. and Pennarola, F., 1998. Monopolio e concorrenza nelle telecomunicazioni: Il caso Omnitel, Milan: Il Sole 24 OreGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, J., 2003. ‘Are mainlines and mobile phones substitutes or complements? Evidence from Africa’, Telecommunications Policy, 27: 190–233CrossRef Google Scholar

Hausman, J. A., 1997. ‘Valuing the effect of regulation on new services in telecommunications’, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 1–38Google Scholar

Hausman, J. A. 2000. ‘Efficiency effects on the US economy from wireless taxation’, National Tax Journal, 53: 733–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Hausman, J. A.2002. ‘Mobile Phone’, in Cave, M., Majumdar, S. K. and Vogelsang, I. (eds.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, 1, Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Hazlett, T. W., 1998. ‘Assigning property rights to radio spectrum users: why did the Federal Communications Commission (US) licence auctions take 67 years?’, Journal of Law and Economics, 41: 529–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Hazlett, T. W. and Boliek, B. E. L., 1999. ‘Use of designated entry preferences in assigning wireless licenses’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 51: 639–62Google Scholar

Hazlett, T. W. and Michaels, R. J., 1993. ‘The cost of rent-seeking: evidence from cellular telephone license lotteries’, Southern Journal of Economics, 59: 425–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Hotelling, H., 1929. ‘Stability in competition’, Economic Journal, 39: 41–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Hultén, S., Andersson, P. and Valiente, P., 2001. ‘3G mobile policy: the case of Sweden’, Stockholm School of Economics, mimeo

International Telecommunications Union (ITU) 1999. World Telecommunication Development Report 1999. Mobile Cellular, Geneva: International Telecommunications Union

International Telecommunications Union (ITU)2002a. World Telecommunication Development Report 2002. Reinventing Telecoms, Geneva: International Telecommunications Union

International Telecommunications Union (ITU)2002b. Trends in Telecommunications Reform 2002, Geneva: International Telecommunications Union

International Telecommunications Union (ITU)2003a. Mobile Overtakes Fixed: Implications for Policy and Regulation, Geneva: International Telecommunications Union

International Telecommunications Union (ITU)2003b. ‘Broadband Korea: Internet case study’, March, mimeo

International Trade Commission (ITC), 1993. ‘Global competitiveness of US advanced-technology industries: cellular communications’, Publication 2646, Washington, DC: International Trade Commission

Jeon, D., Laffont, J. and Tirole, J., 2001. ‘On the receiver pays principle’, Pompeu Fabra University, mimeo

Jha, R. and Majumdar, S. K., 1999. ‘A matter of connections: OECD telecommunications sector productivity and the role of cellular technology diffusion’, Information Economics and Policy, 11: 243–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Jung, V. and Warnecke, H.-J., 1998. Handbuch für die Telekommunikation, Berlin: SpringerCrossRef Google Scholar

Kahn, A. E. 2004. Lessons from Deregulation: Telecommunications and Airlines After the Crunch, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar

Kargman, H., 1978. ‘Land mobile communications: the historical roots’, in Bowers, R., Lee, A. M. and Hershey, C. (eds.), Communications for a Mobile Society, Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C., 1985. ‘Network externalities, competition, and compatibility’, American Economic Review, 77: 402–20Google Scholar

Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. 1986. ‘Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities’, Journal of Political Economy, 94: 822–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Katz, M. L. and Shapiro, C. 1994. ‘Systems competition and network effects’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 93–115CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim, H. S. and Kwon, N., 2002. ‘The advantage of networks size in acquiring new subscribers: a conditional logit analysis of the Korean mobile telephony market’, Information Economics and Policy, 15: 17–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Kim, J. Y. and Lim, Y., 2001. ‘An economic analysis of the receiver pays principle’, Information Economics and Policy, 13: 231–60CrossRef Google Scholar

King, J. L. and West, J., 2002. ‘Ma Bell's orphan: US cellular telephony, 1947–1996’, Telecommunications Policy, 26: 189–203CrossRef Google Scholar

Klemperer, P., 1989. ‘Price wars caused by switching costs’, Review of Economic Studies, 56: 405–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Klemperer, P. 1995. ‘Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade’, Review of Economic Studies, 62: 515–39CrossRef Google Scholar

Klemperer, P. 1999. ‘Auction theory: a guide to the literature’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 13. 227–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Klemperer, P. 2002a. ‘How (not) to run auctions: the European 3G telecom auctions’, European Economic Review, 46: 829–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Klemperer, P.2002b. ‘Using and abusing economic theory’, Oxford University, mimeo

Klemperer, P. 2002c. ‘What really matters in auction design’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16: 169–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J., 2000. Competition in Telecommunications, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Lancaster, K., 1966. ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 74: 796–821CrossRef Google Scholar

Lane, W., 1980. ‘Product differentiation in a market with endogenous sequential entry’, Bell Journal of Economics, 11: 237–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Levin, H. J., 1971. The Invisible Resource: Use and Regulation of the Radio Spectrum, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins PressGoogle Scholar

Levin, S. G., Levin, S. L. and Meisel, J. B., 1987. ‘A dynamic analysis of the adoption of a new technology: the case of optical scanners’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69: 12–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Levine, M. E., 1998. ‘Regulatory capture’, in Newman, P. (ed.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 3, Basingstoke: PalgraveCrossRef Google Scholar

Liebowitz, S. J. and Margolis, S. E., 1999. Winners, Losers & Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology, Oakland, CA: The Independent InstituteGoogle Scholar

Lüngen, B., 1985. ‘The role of mobile telecommunications in Central-Eastern Europe’, Schenk, K. E., Müller, J. and Schnöring, T. (eds.), Mobile Telecommunications: Emerging European Markets, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Mahajan, V., Muller, E. and Bass, F. M., 1993. ‘New product diffusion models’, in Eliashberg, J. and Lilien, G. L. (eds.), Handbook of Operational Research and Management Science, 5, Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar

Malerba, F., 1985. Semiconductor Business: The Economics of Rapid Growth and Decline, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Manguian, J. P., 1993. Les radiocommunications, Paris: Presses Universitaires FrançaisesGoogle Scholar

Matutues, C. and Regibeau, P., 1988. ‘Mix and match: product compatibility without network externalities’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 19: 221–34CrossRef Google Scholar

McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J., 1996. ‘Analyzing the airwaves auction’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10: 159–76CrossRef Google Scholar

McAfee, R. P. and Vincent, D., 1983. ‘The declining price anomaly’, Journal of Economic Theory, 60: 191–212CrossRef Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. J. and Small, J. P., 1997. ‘Econometric cost structure for cellular telephony in the United States’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 12: 147–57CrossRef Google Scholar

McMillan, J., 1994. ‘Selling spectrum rights’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 145–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Mehrotra, A., 1994. Cellular Radio: Analog and Digital Systems, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Melody, W. H., 2001. ‘Spectrum auctions and efficient resource allocation: learning from the 3G experience in Europe’, Info, 3: 5–10CrossRef Google Scholar

Milgrom, P. and Weber, R. J., 1982. ‘A theory of auctions and competitive bidding’, Econometrica, 50: 1089–1122CrossRef Google Scholar

Ministry of Commerce of New Zealand, 1995. ‘Radiocommunications Act review: preliminary conclusions’, December

Ministry of Economic Development of New Zealand, 2000. ‘New Zealand spectrum management. a decade in review: 1989–1999’, PIB, 35, June

Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland, 1998. ‘Telecommunications statistics 1998’, Helsinki: Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications

Miravete, E. J. and Röller, L. H., 2003. ‘Competitive non-linear pricing in duopoly equilibrium: the early US cellular telephone industry’, CEPR Discussion Paper, 4069

Mitchell, I. and Vogelsang, B. M., 1997. Telecommunications Competition: The Last Ten Miles, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

MMC, 1998. ‘Cellnet and Vodafone’, Joint publication by the UK Monopolies and Merger Commission and Oftel, London

Mölleryd, B. G., 1997. ‘The building of a world industry: the impact of entrepreneurship on Swedish mobile telephony’, Teldok, 28e, Stockholm

Morand, P.-H., Mougeot, M. and Naegelen, F., 2001. ‘UMTS: fallait-il choisir un concours de beauté?’, Revue d’économie politique, 5: 669–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Moreton, P. S. and Spiller, P. T., 1998. ‘What's in the air: interlicence synergies in the Federal Communications Commission's broadband personal communications service spectrum auctions’, Journal of Law and Economics, 41: 677–716CrossRef Google Scholar

Morris, P. R., 1990. A History of the World Semiconductor Industry, London: Peter PeregrinusCrossRef Google Scholar

Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N., 1998. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Müller, J. and Callmer, C., 1995. ‘The role of international players in mobile telecommunications in Central and Eastern Europe’, in Schenk, K. E., Müller, J. and Schnöring, T. (eds.), Mobile Telecommunications: Emerging European Markets, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Müller J. and Tooker, S., 1994. ‘Mobile communications in Europe’, in Steinfield, C., Bauer, J. M. and Caby, L., Telecommunications in Transition: Policies, Services and Technologies in the European Community, Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

NAO, 2001. ‘The auction of radio spectrum for the third generation of mobile telephones’, London: NAO, November

Nattermann, P. M., 1999. ‘Estimating firm conduct: the German cellular market’, Doctoral thesis, Georgetown University

Nattermann, P. M. and Murphy, D. D., 1998. ‘The Finnish telecommunications market: advantage of local access incumbency’, Telecommunications Policy, 22: 757–73CrossRef Google Scholar

NERA, 1988. ‘Management of the radio frequency spectrum in New Zealand’, National Economic Research Associates, mimeo, November

Noam, E., 1992. Telecommunications in Europe, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Noble, D., 1962. ‘The history of land mobile communications’, Proceedings of the IRE, Vehicular Communications: 157–79Google Scholar

OECD, 1993. Communications Outlook, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

OECD1996a. Mobile Cellular Communication: Pricing Strategy and Competition, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

OECD1996b. ‘OECD reflection on the benefits of mobile cellular telecommunications infrastructure competition’, GD(96)42, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

OECD1997. The OECD Report on Regulatory Reform, 1: Sectoral Studies, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

OECD1999. ‘Regulatory reform in Japan: regulatory reform in the telecommunications industry’, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, mimeo

OECD2000. ‘Cellular mobile pricing structures and trends’, DSTI/ICCP/TISP(99)11/final, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

OECD2001. Communications Outlook, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

OECD2003. Communications Outlook, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

Offerman, T. and Potters, J., 2000. ‘Does auctioning of entry licences affect consumer’ prices? An experimental study,’ CENter working paper, 55, Tilburg University

Oftel, 1999a. ‘Statement on mobile virtual network operators’, London: Office of Telecommunications

Oftel1999b. ‘Statement on national roaming’, London: Office of Telecommunications

Oftel2001a. ‘Effective competition review: mobile’, London: Office of Telecommunications, February

Oftel2001b. ‘Effective competition review: mobile’, London: Office of Telecommunications, September

Oftel2002. ‘Vodafone, O2, Orange and T-mobile’, London: Office of Telecommunications and Monopolies and Mergers Commission, December

Olmsted Teisberg, E., 1992. ‘Technology choice in digital cellular phone switches’, Working Paper, 92–062, Harvard Business School

Oster, S., 1982. ‘The diffusion of innovation among steel firms: the basic oxygen furnace’, Bell Journal of Economics, 13: 45–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Palmberg C., 1998. ‘Industrial transformation through public technology procurement? The case of the Finnish telecommunications industry’, Doctoral thesis, Åbo University

Parker, P. M. and Röller, L.-H., 1997. ‘Collusive conduct in duopolies: multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industry’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 28: 304–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Pisjak, P., 1995. ‘Mobile telecommunications in Austria’, in Schenk, K. E., Müller, J. and Schnöring, T. (eds), Mobile Telecommunications: Emerging European Markets, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Plott, C. and Salmon, T., 2001. ‘The simultaneous, ascending auction: dynamics of price adjustment in experiments and in the field’, California Institute of Technology and Florida State University, mimeo

PNE, 2000. Mobile Yearbook, London, The Economist Group

Prestowitz, C. V. Jr, 1988. Trading Places: How We Are Giving Our Future to Japan and How to Reclaim It, New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Pulkkinen, M., 1997. ‘The breakthrough of Nokia mobile phones’, Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki School of Economics and Business, A-122

Rappaport, T. S., 1996. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Ray, G. F. (ed.), 1984. The Diffusion of Mature Technologies, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Redl, S. M., Weber, M. K. and Oliphant, M. W., 1995. An Introduction to Global system for mobile communications (formerly Groupe système mobile), Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Regli, B. J. W., 1997. Wireless: Strategically Liberalizing the Telecommunications Market, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar

Reiffen, D., Schumann, L. and Ward, M. R., 2000. ‘Discriminatory dealing with downstream competitors: evidence from the cellular industry’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 48: 253–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Reiffen, D. and Ward, M. R., 1997. ‘Discriminatory dealing with downstream competitors: evidence from the cellular industry’, Federal Communications Commission (US), mimeo

Reinganum, J., 1989. ‘The timing of innovation: research, development and diffusion’, in Schmalensee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, I, Amsterdam: North-Holland

Rochet, J.-C. and Stole, L., 2000. ‘The economics of multidimensional screening’, University of Chicago, mimeo

Rogers, E. M., 1995. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn., New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar PubMed

Rohlfs, J. H., 2001. Bandwagon Effects in High-technology Industries, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Rohlfs J. H., Jackson, C. L. and Kelley, T. E., 1991. ‘Estimate of the loss to the United States caused by the Federal Communications Commission (US) delay in licensing cellular telecommunications’, National Economic Research Associates, November, mimeo

Rose, N. L. and Joskow, P. L., 1990. ‘The diffusion of new technologies: evidence from the electric utility industry’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 21: 354–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruiz, L. K., 1995. ‘Pricing strategies and regulatory effects in the US cellular telecommunications duopolies’, in Brock, G. W. (ed.), Towards a Competitive Telecommunications Industry, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar

Salomon Brothers, 1997. ‘Wireless Europe’, Broker report, March

Saloner, G. and Shepard, A., 1995. ‘Adoption of technologies with network effects: an empirical analysis of the adoption of automated teller machines’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 26: 479–501CrossRef Google Scholar

Salop, S., 1979. ‘Monopolistic competition with outside goods’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 141–56CrossRef Google Scholar

Salop, S. and Stiglitz, J., 1977. ‘Bargains and ripoffs: a model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion’, Review of Economic Studies, 44: 493–510CrossRef Google Scholar

Schenk, K. E., Müller, J. and Schnöring, T. (eds.), 1995. Mobile Telecommunications: Emerging European Markets, Norwood MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Shaked, A. and Sutton, J., 1982. ‘Relaxing price competition through product differentiation’, Review of Economic Studies, 49: 3–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Shaked, A. and Sutton, J. 1983. ‘Natural oligopolies’, Econometrica, 51: 1469–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapiro, C. and Varian, H. R., 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Shew, W. B., 1994. ‘Regulation, competition, and prices in the US cellular telephone industry’, American Enterprise Institute, mimeo

Sidak, J. G. and Spulber, D. F., 1996. ‘Deregulatory takings and breach of the regulatory contract’, New York University Law Review, 71: 851–999Google Scholar

Song, J. D. and Kim, J. C., 2001. ‘Is five too many? Simulation analysis of profitability and cost structure in the Korean mobile telephony industry’, Telecommunications Policy, 25: 101–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Steinbock, D., 2001. The Nokia Revolution: The Story of an Extraordinary Company that Transformed an Industry, New York: AmacomGoogle Scholar

Steinbock, D. 2003. Wireless Horizon: Strategy and Competition in the Worldwide Marketplace, New York: AmacomGoogle Scholar

Stoneman, P., 1983. The Economic Analysis of Technological Change, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Sutton, J., 1991. Sunk Cost and Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Sutton, J. 1998 Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Taylor, L. D., 1994. Telecommunications Demand in Theory and Practice, Boston, MA: KluwerCrossRef Google Scholar

Temin, P., 1987. The Fall of the Bell System, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Tengg, H., 1997. ‘Liberalisierung der Mobilkommunikation in Österreich’, in Kaspar, A. and Rübig, P. (eds.), Telekommunikation: Herausforderung für Österreich, Vienna: Signum

Tirole, J., 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Tyson, L. D., 1992. Who's Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High Technology Industries, Washington, DC: Institute for International EconomicsGoogle Scholar

US DOC, 2001. ‘The potential for accommodating third generation mobile systems in the 1710–1850 MHz band: Federal operations, relocation costs and operational impacts’, Final Report, Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, March

Valletti, T. M., 1999. ‘A model of competition in mobile communications’, Information Economics and Policy, 11: 61–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Valletti, T. M. 2000. ‘Switching costs in vertically related markets’, Review of Industrial Organization, 17: 305–409CrossRef Google Scholar

Valletti, T. M. 2001. ‘Spectrum trading’, Telecommunications Policy, 25: 655–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Valletti, T. M. 2003. ‘Is mobile telephony a natural oligopoly?’, Review of Industrial Organization, 22: 47–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Valletti, T. M. and Cave, M., 1998. ‘Competition in UK mobile communications’, Telecommunications Policy, 22: 109–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Damme, E., 2001. ‘The Dutch auction in retrospect’, mimeo, May

Van De Wielle, B. and Verboven, F., 2000. ‘The timing of entry with consumer switching costs’, University of Antwerp, mimeo

Vickrey, W., 1961. ‘Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders’, Journal of Finance, 16: 32–55CrossRef Google Scholar

Warburg Dillon Reed, 1998. ‘The European cellular growth analyser’, July

Webb, W., 1998. Understanding Cellular Radio, Norwood, MA: Artech HouseGoogle Scholar

Whalley, J. and Curwen, P., 2003. ‘Licence acquisition strategy in the European mobile communications industry’, Info, 5: 45–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Withers, D., 1999. Radio Spectrum Management: Management of the Spectrum and Regulation of Radio Services, 2nd edn, London: Institution of Electrical EngineersCrossRef Google Scholar

Wolfstetter, E., 2001. ‘The Swiss UMTS spectrum auction flop: bad luck or bad design?’, mimeo, May

World Bank, 1994. World Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press

World Bank1998. ‘Telecommunications strategy in the Europe and Central Asia region’, mimeo, December

Wright, J., 1999. ‘International telecommunications, settlement rates, and the Federal Communications Commission (US)’, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 15: 267–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Wright, J.2000, ‘Competition and termination in cellular networks’, University of Auckland, mimeo

Wright, J. 2002. ‘Access pricing under competition: an application to cellular networks’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50: 289–315CrossRef Google Scholar