Alabama Elec. Co-op., Inc. v. FERC, 684 F.2d 20 (D.C. Cir. 1982).Google Scholar

Alabama Power Co. v. Costle, 636 F.2d 323 (D.C. Cir. 1979).Google Scholar

Alabama Power Co. et al. v. FERC, 993 F.2d 1557 (D.C. Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

American Lung Assoc. v. Browner, 884 F.Supp. 345 (DCD Az. 1994).Google Scholar

Arkansas La. Gas Co. v. Hall, 453 U.S. 571 (1981).Google Scholar

Associated Gas Distributors v. FERC, 824 F.2d 981, 998 (D.C. Cir. 1987).Google Scholar

Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2nd Cir. 1979).Google Scholar

California, ex rel. Lockyer v. FERC, 383 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, Coral Power, L.L.C. v. Cal. ex rel. Brown, 551 U.S. 1140 (2007).Google Scholar

California Wilderness Coalition v. Dept. of Energy, 631 F. 3d 1072 (9th Cir 2011).Google Scholar

Central Iowa Power Coop v. FERC, 606 F.2d 1156 (DC Cir 1979).Google Scholar

Central Maine Power Co. v. FERC, 252 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2001).Google Scholar

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).Google Scholar

City of Bethany v. FERC, 727 F.2d 1131 (D.C. Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 917 (1984).Google Scholar

City of Cleveland v. FPC, 525 F.2d 845 (1976).Google Scholar

City of Holyoke v. FERC, 954 F.2d 740 (1992).Google Scholar

City of Holyoke Gas & Elec. Dept. v. SEC, 972 F. 2d 358 (DC Cir 1992).Google Scholar

City of Huntingburg v. FPC, 498 F.2d 778 (D.C. Cir. 1974).Google Scholar

City of Piqua v. FERC, 610 F.2d 950 (D.C. Cir. 1979).Google Scholar

Consumers Energy Co. v. FERC, 367 F.3d 915 (D.C. Cir. 2004).Google Scholar

DiPlacido v. CFTC, 364 F. App'x 657 (2d Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1883 (2010).Google Scholar

Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch et al., 488 U.S. 299 (1989).Google Scholar

Edison Mission Energy, Inc. v. FERC, 394 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir 2005).Google Scholar

Electricity Consumers Resource Council v. FERC, 747 F.2d 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1984).Google Scholar

Elizabethtown Gas Co. v. FERC, 10 F.3d 866 (D.C. Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

Environmental Action Inc., et al. v. FERC, 939 F.2d 1057 (D.C. Cir. 1991).Google Scholar

Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation, 127 S. Ct. 1423 (2007).Google Scholar

Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc., 734 F.2d 1486 (D.C. Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1034 (1984).Google Scholar

Fort Pierce Util. Auth. v. FERC, 730 F.2d 778 (D.C. Cir. 1984).Google Scholar

FPC v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591 (1944).Google Scholar

FPC v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. et al., 315 U.S. 575 (1942).Google Scholar

FPC v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956).Google Scholar

Hendricks v. Dynegy Power Mktg., Inc., 160 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (S.D. Cal. 2001).Google Scholar

Illinois Commerce Comm'n v. FERC, 576 F.3d 470 (7th Cir. 2009).Google Scholar

Illinois Commerce Com'n v. FERC, 721 F. 3d 764 (7th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar

Illinois Commerce Com'n v. FERC, –F.3d – (7th Cir. 2014).Google Scholar

Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964).Google Scholar

Jersey Cent. Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 810 F. 2d 1168 (DC Cir 1988).Google Scholar

Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co., 260 U.S. 156 (1922).Google Scholar

Lead Indus. Ass'n v. EPA, 647 F.2d 1130 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1042 (1980).Google Scholar

Louisiana Energy and Power Authority v. FERC, 141 F.3d 364 (D.C. Cir. 1998).Google Scholar

Maine PUC v. FERC, 520 F.3d 464 (D.C. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar

Maine PUC v. FERC, 625 F.3d 754 (D.C. Cir. 2010).Google Scholar

Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc., 497 U.S. 116 (1990).Google Scholar

Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of California et al., 324 U.S. 548 (1945).Google Scholar

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co., 512 U.S. 218 (1994).Google Scholar

Mississippi Power and Light Co. v. Mississippi, 487 U.S. 354 (1988).Google Scholar

Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC et al., 417 U.S. 283 (1974).Google Scholar

Montana-Dakota Utils. Co. v. Northwestern Pub. Serv. Co., 341 U.S. 246 (1951).Google Scholar

Morgan Stanley v. PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County, 128 S.Ct. 2733 (2008).Google Scholar

Nantahala Power & Light v. Thornburg, 476 U.S. 953 (1986).Google Scholar

National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. FERC, 468 F.3d 831 (D.C. Cir. 2006).Google Scholar

National Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 489 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1974).Google Scholar

Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. FERC, 965 F.2d 1066 (D.C. Cir. 1992).Google Scholar

New England Power Generators Ass'n v. FERC, 707 F. 3d 364 (D.C. Cir. 2013).Google Scholar

New York v. EPA, 443 F.3d 880 (DC Cir 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 2127 (2007).Google Scholar

New York et al. v. FERC, 531 U.S. 1 (2002).Google Scholar

New York Elec. & Gas Corp. v. FERC, 638 F.2d 388 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 821.Google Scholar

North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar

North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176 (D.C. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar

Northeast Utilities v. FERC, 993 F.2d 937 (1st Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

Northern Indiana Public Service Company v. FERC, 954 F.2d 736 (D.C. Cir. 1992).Google Scholar

NRG Power Mktg., LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission, 130 S.Ct. 693 (2010).Google Scholar

Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366 (1973).Google Scholar

Pacific Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 111 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir. 1940).Google Scholar

Pennsylvania Electric Co v. FERC, 11 F.3d 207 (D.C. Cir. 1993).Google Scholar

Piedmont Environmental Council v. FERC, 558 F. 3d 304 (4th Cir 2009), cert. denied, Edison Elec. Inst. v. Piedmont Envtl. Council, 130 S. Ct. 1138 (2010).Google Scholar

Power Co. of America, L.P. v. FERC, 245 F.3d 839 (D.C. Cir. 2001).Google Scholar

Public Serv. Co. of Ind. v. FERC, 575 F. 2d 1204 (7th Cir 1978).Google Scholar

Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. FERC, 600 F.2d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 990 (1979).Google Scholar

Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. Patch, 167 F. 3d 15 (1st Cir. 1998).Google Scholar

Pub. Util. Comm'n of Rhode Island v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co., 273 U.S. 83 (1927).Google Scholar

Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc., 384 F.3d 756 (9th Cir. 2004).Google Scholar

Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC, 272 F.3d 607 (D.C. Cir. 2001).Google Scholar

Sierra Club v. Ruckelshaus, 344 F. Supp. 253 (DC Cir. 1972), atf'd per curiam sub nom. Fri v. Sierra Club, 412 U.S. 541 (1973).Google Scholar

South Carolina Public Service Authority v. FERC, – F.3d – (DC Cir 2014).Google Scholar

Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc., 476 U.S. 409 (1986).Google Scholar

State of New Jersey v. EPA, 517 F.3d 574 (D.C. Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 1308 (2009).Google Scholar

Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 703 F.2nd 927 (5th Cir. 1983).Google Scholar

Tampa Elec. Co. v. Garcia, 767 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 2000).Google Scholar

Tejas Power Corp. v. FERC, 908 F.2d 998 (D.C. Cir. 1990).Google Scholar

Texas Commercial Energy v. TXU Energy, Inc., 413 F.3d 503 (5th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar

Texas Power Co. v. FERC, 908 F.2d 998 (D.C. Cir. 1990).Google Scholar

Town of Norwood v. FERC, 962 F.2d 20 (D.C. Cir. 1992).Google Scholar

Town of Norwood, Mass. v. New England Power Co., 202 F.3d 408 (1st Cir. 2000).Google Scholar

Towns of Concord, Norwood and Wellesley v. FERC, 955 F.2d 67 (D.C. Cir. 1992).Google Scholar

Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. FERC, 225 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2000).Google Scholar

Union Elec. Co. v. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 257 (1976).Google Scholar

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Div., 358 U.S. 103 (1958).Google Scholar

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956).Google Scholar

United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563 (1966).Google Scholar

United States v. City of Painesville, 644 F.2d 1186 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 894 (1981).Google Scholar

Utilimax.com, Inc. v. PPL Energy Plus, LLC, 378 F.3d 303 (3rd Cir. 2004).Google Scholar

Utility Users League v. FPC, 394 F. 2d 16 (7th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 953 (1968).Google Scholar

Verizon Commc'ns Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004).Google Scholar

Wah Chang v. Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC, 507 F.3d 1222 (9th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar

Whitman v. American Trucking, 531 U. S. 457 (2001).Google Scholar

Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Reilly, 893 F.2d 901 (7th Cir. 1990).Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce A. and Hassler, William T., “Beyond the New Deal: Coal and the Clean Air Act,” 89 Yale Law Journal 1466 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, Frank, et al., “Grandfathering and Coal Plant Emissions: the Cost of Cleaning up the Clean Air Act,” Energy Policy 27 (1999): 92–40.Google Scholar

Adams, Aster, “Impact of Deregulation on Cost Efficiency, Financial Performance and Shareholder Wealth of Electric Utilities in the United States” (Ph.D. Diss., Vanderbilt University, December 2008).Google Scholar

Adib, Parviz and Zarnikau, Jay, “Texas: The Most Robust Competitive Market in North America,” in Sioshansi, Fereidoon P. and Pfaffenberger, Wolfgang, eds., Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective (Holland, Elsevier, 2006).Google Scholar

Adler, Jonathan H., “Fables of the Cuyahoga: Reconstructing a History of Environmental Protection,” 14 Fordham Environmental Law Journal 89 (2002).Google Scholar

Agnone, Jon, “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement,” Social Forces 85 (June 2007): 1593–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, George, “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (1970): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Barbara R., Part One: An Analysis of Residential Energy Markets in Georgia, Massachusetts, Ohio, New York and Texas, at http://neaap.ncat.org/experts/PartOnePDF.pdf (last visited June 17, 2011).Google Scholar

Allison, Gary D., “Imprudent Power Construction Projects: The Malaise of Traditional Public Utility Policies,” 13 Hofstra Law Review 507 (1985).Google Scholar

Alvarado, Fernando and Rajaraman, Rajesh, “The Best Game in Town: NERC's TLR Rules,” IEEE Winter Meeting, Tutorial on Game Theory, 1999.Google Scholar

American Economic Association, “American Economic Association Adopts Extensions to Principles for Author Disclosure of Conflict of Interest,” press release, January 5, 2012, at https://www.aeaweb.org/PDF_files/PR/AEA_Adopts_Extensions_to_Principles_for_Author_Disclosure_01-05-12.pdf (last visited November 19, 2014).Google Scholar

American Gas Foundation, Public Policy and Real Energy Efficiency: Assessing the Effects of Federal Policies on Energy Consumption and the Environment, prepared for the American Gas Foundation by GARDAnalytics (October 2005).Google Scholar

Anderson, John, “The Competitive Sourcing of Retail Electricity: An Idea Whose Time Has (Finally) Come,” Utility Director's Workshop, Williamsburg, VA, September 10, 1993.Google Scholar

Ando, Amy W. and Palmer, Karen L., “Getting on the Map: The Political Economy of State-Level Electricity Restructuring,” Resources for the Future, 8–19-REV, May 1998.Google Scholar

Andrews, Richard N.L., Managing the Environment, Managing Ourselves: A History of American Environmental Policy (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Arciniegas, Ismael, Barrett, Chris, and Marathe, Achla, “Assessing the Efficiency of US Electricity Markets,” Utilities Policy 11 (2003): 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arocena, Pablo, Saal, David, and Coelli, Tim, “Measuring Economies of Horizontal and Vertical Integration in the US Electric Power Industry: How Costly Is Unbundling?” Working Paper RP 0917, Aston Business School, June 2009.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. Brian, “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In By Historical Events,” Economic Journal 99 (1989): 116–31.Google Scholar

Atwood, James R., “Antitrust, Joint Ventures, and Electric Utility Restructuring: RTGS and POOLCOS,” 64 Antitrust Law Journal 323 (Winter 1996).Google Scholar

Auffhammer, Maximilian and Sanstad, Alan, “Energy Efficiency in the Residential and Commercial Sectors,” Resources for the Future, Background Paper (January, 2011).Google Scholar

Averch, Harvey and Johnson, Leland L., “Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint,” American Economic Review 52 (December 1962): 1053–69.Google Scholar

Bachman, John, “Will the Circle Be Unbroken: A History of the U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 57 (June 2007): 652–97.Google Scholar

Bachrach, Devra Ruth, “Comparing the Risk Profiles of Renewable and Natural Gas Electricity Contracts: A Summary of the California Department of Water Resources Contracts” (MS Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, May 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Elizabeth E., “Contestability and the Design of Regulatory and Antitrust Policy,” American Economic Review 71 (May 1981): 178–83.Google Scholar

Bailey, Elizabeth E. and Baumol, William J., “Deregulation and the Theory of Contestable Markets,” 1 Yale Journal on Regulation 111 (1984).Google Scholar

Bailey, Elizabeth M., “The Geographic Expanse of the Market for Wholesale Electricity,” Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (February 1998).Google Scholar

Baldick, Ross, “Computing the Electricity Market Equilibrium: Uses of Market Equilibrium Models,” IEEE, Power Systems Conference and Exposition (2006).Google Scholar

Bamberger, Kenneth and Strauss, Peter, “Chevron's Two Steps,” 95 Virginia Law Review 611 (2009).Google Scholar

Banal-Estañol, Albert and Micola, Augusto Rupérez, “Composition of Electricity Generation Portfolios, Pivotal Dynamics, and Market Prices,” Management Science 55 (November 2009): 1813–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, A.H., Reutter, Keith A., and Thompson, Henry, “The First Step in Restructuring the US Electric Industry,” Energy Economics 27 (2005): 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartholomew, Emily S., Buskirk, Robert Van, and Marnay, Chris, Conservation in California During the Summer of 2001, LBNL-51477 (September 2002).Google Scholar

Baumol, William J., Panzer, J.C. and Willig, R.P., Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure (San Diego, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982).Google Scholar

Baumol, William J. and Sidak, J. Gregory, “Stranded Costs,” 18 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 837 (Summer 1995).Google Scholar

Becker, Gary, “Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory,” Journal of Political Economy 70 (February 1962): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary, “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (August 1983): 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker-Blease, John, Goldberg, Lawrence, and Kaen, Fred, “Post Deregulation Restructuring of the Electric Power Industry: Value Creation or Value Destruction?” Working Paper, February 26, 2004.Google Scholar

Beermann, Jack, “The Turn Toward Congress in Administrative Law,” 89 Boston University Law Review 727 (2009).Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew and Elman, Colin, “Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods; the Example of Path Dependence,” Political Analysis 14 (2006): 250–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergek, Anna, et al., “Technological Capabilities and Late Shakeouts: Industrial Dynamics in the Advanced Gas Turbine Industry, 1987–2002,” Industrial and Corporate Change 17 (2008): 335–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergstrom, Roger, Cao, Christi, and Tolbert, Tommie, Key Aspects of Electric Restructuring Supplemental Volume II: the State Summaries 2003 Updates, Florida Public Service Commission, July 2003.Google Scholar

BernsteinResearch, “U.S. Utilities: Coal-Fired Generation is Squeezed in the Vice of EPA Regulation; Who Wins and Who Loses?” (October 2010).Google Scholar

BernsteinResearch, “U.S. Utilities: Can Texas Comply With the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule? Yes, If Existing Scrubbers Are Turned On” (July 20, 2011).Google Scholar

Berry, William W., “The Case for Competition in the Electric Utility Industry,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 110 (September 1982): 12–20.Google Scholar

Besanko, David, D'Souza, Julia, and Thiagarajan, S. Ramu, “The Effect of Wholesale Market Deregulation on Shareholder Wealth in the Electric Power Industry,” 44 Journal of Law and Economics 65 (April 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhavaraju, Marty, Hobbs, Benhamin, and Hu, Ming-Che, “PJM Reliability Pricing Model – A Summary and Dynamic Analysis,” IEEE (2007).Google Scholar

Bialek, Janusz, “Recent Blackouts in US and Continental Europe: Is Liberalisation to Blame?” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 0407 (January 16, 2004).Google Scholar

Blacconiere, Walter G., Johnson, Marilyn F., and Johnson, Mark S., “Market Valuation and Deregulation of Electric Utilities,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (2000): 231–60.Google Scholar

Black, Bernard S. and Pierce, Jr. Richard J., “The Choice Between Markets and Central Planning in Regulating the U.S. Electricity Industry,” 93 Columbia Law Review 1339 (1993).Google Scholar

Blair, Peter, “The Role of Analytical Models: Issues and Frontiers,” EMF WP 10.2 (March 1991).Google Scholar

Blumsack, Seth, “Network Topologies and Transmission Investment Under Electric-Industry Restructuring,” (Ph.D Diss., Carnegie Mellon University, 2006).Google Scholar

Blumsack, Seth, Lester Lave, and Jay Apt, “Electricity Prices and Costs Under Regulation and Restructuring,” CEIC-08–03 (May 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumstein, Carl, Friedman, L.S., and Green, R.J., “The History of Electricity Restructuring in California,” CSEM (August 2002).Google Scholar

Blumstein, Carl, Goldman, Charles, and Barbose, Galen, “Who Should Administer Energy-Efficiency Programs?” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (August 2003).Google Scholar

Bodmer, Edward, “The Electric Honeypot: The Profitability of Deregulated Electric Generation Companies,” for the APPA (January 2007).Google Scholar

Bodmer, Edward, “The Deregulation Penalty: Losses for Consumers and Gains for Sellers,” a report to the APPA (August 2009).Google Scholar

Bohn, Roger B., Tabors, Richard U., Golub, Bennett W., and Schweppe, Fred C., “Deregulating the Electric Utility Industry,” MIT Energy Laboratory Technical Report (January 1982).Google Scholar

Bonardi, Jean-Philippe, Holburn, Guy, and Bergh, Richard Vanden, “Nonmarket Strategy Performance: Evidence From U.S. Electric Utilities,” Academy of Management Journal 49 (2006): 1209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonbright, James C., Principles of Public Utility Rates (New York, Columbia University Press, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borenstein, Severin, Bushnell, James, Kahn, Edward, and Stoft, Steven, “Market Power in California Electricity Markets,” Utilities Policy 5 (July/October 1995): 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borenstein, Severin, Bushnell, James, Kahn, Edward, and Stoft, Steven, “An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California's Electricity Industry,” POWER (December 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borenstein, Severin, Bushnell, James, Knittel, Christopher R., and Wolfram, Catherine, “Inefficiencies and Market Power in Financial Arbitrage: A Study of California's Electricity Markets,” Working Paper (September 24, 2006).Google Scholar

Borenstein, Severin, Bushnell, James, and Stoft, Steven, “The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Market,” Rand Journal of Economics 31 (Summer 2000): 294–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borenstein, Severin, Bushnell, James, and Wolak, Frank A., “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market,” American Economic Review 92 (December 2002): 1376–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosso, Christopher J. and Guber, Deborah Lynn, “Maintaining Presence: Environmental Advocacy and the Permanent Campaign,” in Vig, N.J. and Kraft, M.E., eds., Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty First Century (Washington DC, CQ Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Bouknight, Jr. and Raskin, David, “Planning for Wholesale Customer Loads in a Competitive Environment: The Obligation to Provide Wholesale Service under the Federal Power Act,” 8 Energy Law Journal 237 (1987).Google Scholar

BradleyJr., Robert L., “The Origins of Political Electricity: Market Failure or Political Opportunism?” 17 Energy Law Journal 59 (1996).Google Scholar

Bratton, William, “Does Corporate Law Protect the Interest of Shareholders and Other Stakeholders? Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value,” 76 Tulane Law Review 1275 (June 2002).Google Scholar

Brennan, Timothy J., “Consumer Preference Not to Choose: Methodological and Policy Implications,” Resources For the Future, RFF DP 05–51 (November 2005).Google Scholar

Bressman, Lisa, “Procedures as Politics in Administrative Law,” 107 Columbia Law Review 1749 (2007).Google Scholar

Bressman, Lisa and Vandenbergh, Michael, “Inside the Administrative State: A Critical Look at the Practice of Presidential Control,” 105 Michigan Law Review 47 (2006).Google Scholar

Brien, Laura, “Why the Ancillary Services Markets in California Don't Work and What to Do About Them,” NERA, February 7, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Ashley and Rossi, Jim, “Siting Transmission Lines in a Changed Milieu: Evolving Notions of the ‘Public Interest’ in Balancing State and Regional Considerations,” 81 University of Colorado Law Review 705 (2010).Google Scholar

Bryce, Robert, Pipe Dreams: Greed, Ego and the Death of Enron (New York, PublicAffairs, 2002).Google Scholar

Bryner, Gary C., Blue Skies, Green Politics, The Clean Air Act of 1990 (Washington, DC, CQ Press 1995).Google Scholar

Buchmann, Alan and Tongren, Robert, “Nonunanimous Settlements of Public Utility Rate Cases: A Response,” 113 Yale Journal on Regulation 337 (Winter 1996).Google Scholar

Burns, Robert E., et al., The Prudent Investment Test in the 1980s (Columbus, National Regulatory Research Institute, April 1985).Google Scholar

Burtraw, Dallas and Palmer, Karen, “The Paparazzi Take a Look at a Living Legend: The SO2 Cap-and-Trade Program for Power Plants in the United States,” Resources For the Future, DP03–15 (April 2003).Google Scholar

Burtraw, Dallas, et al., “The Costs and Benefits of Reducing Acid Rain,” Resources For the Future, Discussion Paper 97–31-REV (September 1997).Google Scholar

Burtraw, Dallas, et al., “Price Discovery in Emissions Permit Auctions,” Resources For the Future, DP 10–32 (June 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bush, Darren and Mayne, Carrie, “In (Reluctant) Defense of Enron: Why Bad Regulation Is to Blame for California's Power Woes (or Why Antitrust Law Fails to Protect Against Market Power When the Market Rules Encourage Its Use),” 83 Oregon Law Review 207 (2004).Google Scholar

Bushnell, James and Blumstein, Carl, “A Reader's Guide to the Blue Book: Issues in California's Electric Industry Restructuring and Regulatory Reform,” POWER (June 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bushnell, James, Mansur, Erin, and Saravia, Celeste, “Vertical Arrangements, Market Structure, and Competition: An Analysis of Restructured US Electricity Markets,” American Economic Review 98 (2008): 237–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bushnell, James and Saravia, Celeste, “An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market,” Center for the Study of Energy Markets, WP 101 (2002).Google Scholar

Bushnell, James and Stoft, Stephen, “Electric Grid Investment Under a Contract Network Regime,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 10 (1996): 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bushnell, James and Stoft, Stephen, “Improving Private Incentives for Electric Grid Investment,” Resource and Energy Economics 19 (1997): 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bushnell, James and Wolfram, Catherine, “Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants,” Working Paper (March 2005).Google Scholar

Bushnell, James and Wolfram, Catherine, “The Guy at the Controls: Labor Quality and Power Plant Efficiency,” Center for the Study of Energy Markets, WP 121 (July 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CAISO, Department of Market Analysis, “Price Cap Policy for Summer 2000” (March 2000).Google Scholar

CAISO, Department of Market Analysis, “Report of California Energy Market Issues and Performance: May–June 2000” (August 10, 2000).Google Scholar

CAISO, Department of Market Analysis, “Report on Real Time Supply Costs above Single Price Auction Threshold: December 8, 2000 – January 31, 2001” (February 28, 2001).Google Scholar

CAISO, Department of Market Analysis, “Analysis of Trading and Scheduling Strategies Described in Enron Memos” (October 4, 2002).Google Scholar

CAISO, Market Surveillance Unit, “Preliminary Report On the Operation of the Ancillary Services Markets of the California Independent System Operator (ISO)” (August 19, 1998).Google Scholar

CAISO, “Annual Report on Market Issues and Performance” (June 1999).Google Scholar

CAISO Market Surveillance Committee, “Report on the Redesign of California Real time Energy and Ancillary Services Markets” (October 18, 1999).Google Scholar

CAISO Market Surveillance Committee, “Analysis of 'Order Proposing Remedies for California Wholesale Electric Markets (Issued November 1, 2000),” (December 1, 2000).Google Scholar

California Energy Commission, “High Temperatures & Electricity Demand: An Assessment of Supply Adequacy in California,” Staff Report (July 1999).Google Scholar

California Energy Commission, “Market Clearing Prices Under Alternative Resource Scenarios, 2000–2010,” Staff Report (February 2000).Google Scholar

California State Auditor, “California Energy Markets: Pressures Have Eased, but Cost Risks Remain,” Report #2001-009, Sacramento, CA (December 2001).Google Scholar

CalPX Market Monitoring Committee, “Report on Market Issues in the California Power Exchange Energy Markets,” Prepared for FERC, August 17, 1998.Google Scholar

CalPX Market Monitoring Committee, “Second Report on Market Issues in the California Power Exchange Energy Markets,” Prepared for FERC, March 19, 1999.Google Scholar

Caplan, Bryan, “From Friedman to Whittman: The Transformation of Chicago Political Economy,” Economic Journal Watch 2 (April 2005): 1–21.Google Scholar

Carden, Kevin, Wintermantel, Nick, and Pfeifenberger, Johannes, The Economics of Resource Adequacy Planning: Why Reserve Margins Are Not Just About Keeping the Lights On (Columbus, National Regulatory Research Institute, 2011).Google Scholar

Carlton, Dennis, “Why Barriers to Entry are Barriers to Understanding,” American Economic Review 94 (May 2004): 466–70.Google Scholar

Carlton, Dennis and Perloff, Jeffrey, Modern Industrial Organization (Glenview, Scott Foresman/Little Brown, 1990).Google Scholar

Casazza, Jack and Delea, Frank, Understanding Electric Power Systems: An Overview of Technology, the Marketplace and Government Regulation, 2nd Ed. (Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casazza, Jack, Delea, Frank, and Loehr, George, “Contributions of the Restructuring of the Electric Power Industry to the August 14, 2003 Blackout,” in US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force, Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, Recommendation 12: The Relationship between Competitive Power Markets and Grid Reliability (July 2006).Google Scholar

Cavanagh, Ralph, “Least-Cost Planning Imperatives for Electric Utilities and Their Regulators,” 5 Harvard Environmental Law Review 299 (1988).Google Scholar

Cavanagh, Sheila, Hahn, Robert, and Stavins, Robert, “National Environmental Policy During the Clinton Years,” Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 01–38, September 2001.Google Scholar

CBO, Promoting Efficiency in the Electricity Sector (Washington, DC, GPO, 1982).Google Scholar

CBO, Electric Utilities: Deregulation and Stranded Costs (Washington, DC, GPO, 1998).Google Scholar

Celebi, Metin, “Potential Coal Plant Retirements Under Emerging Environmental Regulations,” The Brattle Group, presentation to MREA, St. Cloud, Minnesota, August 10, 2011.Google Scholar

Celebi, Metin, “Potential Coal Plant Retirements: 2012 Update,” The Brattle Group, Discussion Paper, October 2012.Google Scholar

Chao, Hung-po, Oren, Shmuel, and Wilson, Robert, “Restructured Electricity Markets: Reevaluation of Vertical Integration and Unbundling,” in Sioshansi, Fereidoon P., ed., Competitive Electricity Markets: Design, Implementation, Performance (Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2008).Google Scholar

Chao, Hung-Po and Peck, Stephen, “A Market Mechanism for Electric Power Transmission,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 10 (1996): 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chao, Hung-po, Peck, Stephen, Oren, Shmuel, and Wilson, Robert, “Flow-Based Transmission Rights and Congestion Management,” Electricity Journal (October 2000): 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, David L., “Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future,” GE Power Systems GER-4206 (April 2001).Google Scholar

Chen, Jim, “The Death of the Regulatory Compact: Adjusting Prices and Expectations in the Law of Regulated Industries,” 67 Ohio State Law Journal 1265 (2006).Google Scholar

Cheney, Dick, et al., National Energy Policy: Report of the National Energy Policy Development Group (Washington, DC, GPO, 2001).Google Scholar

Chestnut, Lauraine and Mills, David, “A Fresh Look at the Benefits and Costs of the US Acid Rain Program,” Journal of Environmental Management 77 (2005): 252–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chincarini, Ludwig, “A Case Study on Risk Management: Lessons from the Collapse of Amaranth Advisors L.L.C.,” Journal of Applied Finance (Spring/Summer 2008): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, Laurits R. and Greene, William, “Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation,” Journal of Political Economy 84 (1976): 655–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chupka, Marc W. and Basheda, Gregory, “Rising Utility Construction Costs: Sources and Impacts,” Brattle Group for the Edison Foundation (September 2007).Google Scholar

Clark, John Maurice, “Toward a Concept of Workable Competition,” American Economic Review 30 (1940): 241–56.Google Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, “Social Movements, Law, and Society: Institutionalization of the Environmental Movement,” 150 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 85 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coglianese, Gary, “Presidential Control of Administrative Agencies: A Debate Over Law or Politics?” 12 Journal of Constitutional Law 637 (2010).Google Scholar

Cohen, Armond and Kihm, Steven, “The Political Economy of Retail Wheeling, or How Not to Refight the Last War,” Electricity Journal (April 1994): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Linda, Peck, Stephen, Sanyal, Paroma, and Weinberg, Carl, “Retrospective Report on California's Electricity Crisis,” CEC, PIER Report, CEC-500–2006–021 (January 2004).Google Scholar

Cohen, Matthew, “Efficiency and Competition in the Electric Power Industry,” 88 Yale Law Journal 1511 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Richard E., Washington at Work: Back Rooms and Clean Air, 2nd ed. (Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1995).Google Scholar

Colton, Roger, “Excess Capacity: A Case Study in Ratemaking Theory and Application,” 20 Tulsa Law Journal 402 (1984).Google Scholar

Comnes, G.A., Belden, T.N., and Kahn, E.P., “The Price of Electricity from Private Power Producers, Stage II: Expansion of Sample and Preliminary Statistical Analysis,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBL-36054 (February 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley II, Joe Greene, “Environmentalism Contained: A History of Corporate Response to the New Environmentalism” (Ph.D. Diss, Princeton University, November 2006).Google Scholar

Costello, Kenneth W., Burns, Robert E., and Hegazy, Youssef, “Overview of Issues Relating to the Retail Wheeling of Electricity,” National Regulatory Research Institute, NRRI 94–09 (May 1994).Google Scholar

Cowan, Robin, “Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in,” Journal of Economic History 50 (September 1990): 541–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CPUC, “California's Electric Services Industry: Perspectives on the Past, Strategies for the Future” (February 1993) (“Yellow Book”).Google Scholar

CPUC, “Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Proposed Policies Governing Restructuring California's Electric Services Industry and Reforming Regulation; Order Instituting Rulemaking and Order Instituting Investigation” (April 20, 1994) (“Blue Book”).Google Scholar

CRA, “A Reliability Assessment of EPA's Proposed Transport Rule and Forthcoming Utility MACT,” prepared for Exelon Corporation (December 16, 2010).Google Scholar

Craig, J. Dean and Savage, Scott, “Market Restructuring, Competition and the Efficiency of Electricity Generation: Plant-level Evidence from the United States 1996 to 2006,” The Energy Journal 34 (2013): 1–31.Google Scholar

Crain, Andrew, “Ford, Carter, and Deregulation in the 1970s,” Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law 5 (2007): 413–47.Google Scholar

Cramton, Peter, “Assessment of Submissions by California Parties,” Rebuttal Addendum of Behalf of Duke Energy, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Dockets Nos EL00–95–075, EL00–98–063, March 20, 2003.Google Scholar

Cramton, Peter, “Competitive Bidding Behavior in Uniform-Price Auction Markets,” Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (January 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cramton, Peter and Stoft, Steven, “A Capacity Market That Makes Sense,” Electricity Journal 18 (August/September 2005): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cramton, Peter and Wilson, Robert, “A Review of ISO New England's Proposed Market Rules,” Exhibit A, ISO-NE filing (September 9, 1998).Google Scholar

Credit Suisse, “Growth From Subtraction; Impact of EPA Rules on Power Markets” (September 23, 2010).Google Scholar

Criddle, Evan, “Chevron's Consensus,” 88 Boston University Law Review 1271 (2009).Google Scholar

Cudahy, Richard D., “Whither Deregulation: A Look at the Portents,” 58 N.Y.U. Annual Survey of American Law 155 (2001).Google Scholar

Cudahy, Richard and Henderson, William, “From Insull to Enron: Corporate (Re)Regulation After the Rise and Fall of Two Energy Icons,” 26 Energy Law Journal 35 (2005).Google Scholar

Culp, Christopher and Hanke, Steve, “Empire of the Sun: An Economic Interpretation of Enron's Energy Business,” Policy Analysis 470 (February 20, 2003): 1–19.Google Scholar

Daly, Herman E., Toward a Steady-State Economy (San Francisco, W.H. Freeman, 1973).Google Scholar

Dang, Hoang, “New Power, Few New Lines: A Need For a Federal Solution,” 17 Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 327 (2002).Google Scholar

David, Paul, “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,” American Economic Review 75 (May 1985): 332–37.Google Scholar

David, Paul, “Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’: Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations and Institutions,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5 (1994): 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Lucas and Wolfram, Catherine, “Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power,” EI @ Haas Working Paper 217 (August 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Sandra K., “Rewiring Electricity Transmission Policy,” Paper Presented at the 2011 WPSA conference (April 21–23, 2011).Google Scholar

Davis, Steven, Grim, Cheryl and Haltiwanger, John, “Productivity Dispersion and Input Prices: the Case of Electricity,” U.S. Bureau of the Census, CES 08–33 (September 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Steven, Grim, Cheryl, Haltiwanger, John, and Streitwieser, Mary, “Electricity Pricing to U.S. Manufacturing Plants, 1963–2000” (April 22, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Long, J. Bradford and Lang, Kevin, “Are All Economic Hypotheses False?” Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992): 1257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Defeuilley, Christophe, “Retail Competition in Electricity Markets,” Energy Policy 37 (2009): 378.Google Scholar

Delgado, Jose, “The Blackout of 2003 and its Connection to Open Access,” in U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force, Recommendation 12: The Relationship between Competitive Power Markets and Grid Reliability (July 2006).Google Scholar

Delmas, Magali and Tokat, Yesim, “Deregulation, Governance Structures, and Efficiency: The U.S. Electric Utility Sector,” Strategic Management Journal 26 (2005): 441–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demsetz, Harold, “Why Regulate Utilities,” 11 Journal of Law and Economics 55 (April 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeMocker, James, Greenwald, Judith and Schwengel, Paul, “Extended Lifetimes for Coal-fired Power Plants: Effect Upon Air Quality,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 177 (March 20, 1986).Google Scholar

Deng, Shi-Jie, Oren, Shmuel, and Meliopoulos, Sakis, “The Inherent Inefficiency of the Point-to-Point Congestion Revenue Right Auction,” Proceeding of the 37th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences (2004).Google Scholar

Dennis, Jeffery S., “Federalism, Electric Industry Restructuring, and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Tampa Electric Co. v. Garcia and State Restrictions on the Development of Merchant Power Plants,” 43 Natural Resources Journal 615 (Spring 2003).Google Scholar

Derman, Emanuel and Wilmott, Paul, “The Financial Modelers' Manifesto” (January 7, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul J., The Politics of Deregulation (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Dobson, Ian et al., “Electric Power Transfer Capability: Concepts, Applications, Sensitivity and Uncertainty,” Power Systems Engineering Research Center (November 2001).Google Scholar

DOE, Electricity Advisory Committee, Keeping the Lights On in a New World (Washington, DC, January 2009).Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, “Integration of Electric Power: A Framework for Analysis, A Draft Discussion Paper, Phase 2 Report,” prepared by MIT, September 1982.Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, “The Impact of Wholesale Electricity Price Controls on California Summer Reliability,” June 2001.Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, National Transmission Grid Study (May 2002).Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, “The Value of Economic Dispatch; A Report to Congress Pursuant to Section 1234 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005” (November 7, 2005).Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, National Electric Transmission Congestion Study (August 2006).Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, “National Electric Transmission Congestion Report” (October 5, 2007).Google Scholar

DOE, Office of Policy Planning and Analysis, “Resource Adequacy Implications of Forthcoming EPA Air Quality Regulations” (December 2011).Google Scholar

DOJ and FTC, Horizontal Merger Guidelines, April 2, 1992, 57 FR 41552 (1992).Google Scholar

DOJ and FTC, Horizontal Merger Guidelines (August 19, 2010).Google Scholar

Domagalski, John L., Ros, Agustin J., and O'Connor, Philip R., “Another Look at What's Driving Utility Stock Prices,” Public Utilities Fortnightly 135 (January 15, 1997): 42–45.Google Scholar

Dorsi, Michael, “Piedmont Environmental Council v. FERC,” 34 Harvard Environmental Law Review 593 (2010).Google Scholar

Doucet, Joseph and Littlechild, Stephen, “Negotiated Settlements: The Development of Economic and Legal Thinking,” CWPE 0622 and EPRG 0604 (September 2006).Google Scholar

Doucouliagos, Chris and Stanley, T.D., “Theory Competition and Selectivity: Are All Economic Facts Greatly Exaggerated?” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2012): 316–39.Google Scholar

Dowden, Lisa, Pearson, Stephen, and Birchard, Melissa, “Update on CFTC Actions under Dodd-Frank as They Affect the Electric Power Industry,” Prepared for APPA 2011 Legal Conference (November 9, 2011).Google Scholar

D'Souza, Julia and Jacob, John, “Electric Utility Stranded Costs: Valuation and Disclosure Issues,” Journal of Accounting Research 39 (2001): 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duane, Timothy P., “Regulation's Rationale: Learning from the California Energy Crisis,” 19 Yale Journal on Regulation 471 (2002).Google Scholar

Eagle, Steven J., “Securing a Reliable Electricity Grid: A New Era in Transmission Siting Regulation?” George Mason University School of Law (September 13, 2005).Google Scholar

Earley, Wilbur C., “FERC Regulation of Bulk Power Coordination Transactions,” FERC Working Paper (July 1984).Google Scholar

Eaton, B. Curtis and Lipsey, Richard, “Exit Barriers Are Entry Barriers: The Durability of Capital as a Barrier to Entry,” Bell Journal of Economics 11 (Autumn 1980): 721–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eaton, Jade Alice, “Recent United States Department of Justice Actions in the Electric Utility Industry,” 9 Connecticut Journal of International Law 857 (Summer 1994).Google Scholar

Economic Report of the President, 2012 (Washington, DC, GPO, 2012).Google Scholar

EEI, “Deregulation of Electric Utilities: A Survey of Major Concepts and Issues” (July 1981).Google Scholar

EEI, Statistical Yearbook of the Electric Utility Industry 1982 (Washington, DC, 1983).Google Scholar

EEI, “Transmission Projects: At a Glance” (March 2011).Google Scholar

EEI, “New Source Review: a History” (2001).Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Paul, The Population Bomb (New York, Ballantine, 1968).Google Scholar

EIA, The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry 1970–1991 (Washington, DC, GPO, 1993).Google Scholar

EIA, Financial Statistics of Major U.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1992 (Washington, DC, GPO, 1993).Google Scholar

EIA, Electric Power Annual 1992 (Washington, DC, GPO, 1994).Google Scholar

EIA, Financial Impacts of Nonutility Power Purchases on Investor-Owned Electric Utilities (Washington, DC, GPO, 1994).Google Scholar

EIA, The Effects of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities: An Update (Washington, DC, GPO, 1997).Google Scholar

EIA, State Energy Price and Expenditure Report (Washington, DC, GPO, 1995).Google Scholar

EIA, The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry: An Update (Washington, DC, GPO, 1996).Google Scholar

EIA, Electricity Prices in a Competitive Environment: Marginal Cost Pricing of Generation Services and Financial Status of Electric Utilities (Washington, DC, GPO, 1997).Google Scholar

EIA, The Changing Structure of the Electric Power Industry 1999: Mergers and Other Corporate Combinations (Washington, DC, GPO, 1999).Google Scholar

EIA, Annual Energy Review, various years.Google Scholar

Eichenwald, Kurt, Conspiracy of Fools: A True Story (New York, Random House, 2005).Google Scholar

Eisen, Joel, “Regulatory Linearity, Commerce Clause Brinksmanship, and Retrenchment in Electric Utility Deregulation,” 40 Wake Forest Law Review 545 (2005).Google Scholar

Ellerman, Denny and Dubroeucq, Florence, “Sources of Emission Reductions: Evidence for US SO₂ Emissions 1985–2002,” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 0429 (2004).Google Scholar

Ellerman, Denny and Montero, Juan-Pablo, “The Declining Trend in Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: Implications for Allowance Prices,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36 (1998): 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, James D., “Electric Utility Regulation Reform in New York: Economic Competitiveness at the Expense of the Environment?” 13 Pace Environmental Law Review 281 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emmons III, William, “Franklin D. Roosevelt, Electric Utilities, and the Power of Competition,” Journal of Economic History 53 (1993): 880–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Energy Policy Project of the Ford Foundation, A Time to Choose: America's Energy Future (Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1974).Google Scholar

England, Richard W. and Mitchell, Eric P., “Federal Regulation and Environmental Impact of the U.S. Nuclear Power Industry, 1974–1984,” 30 Natural Resources Journal 537 (1990).Google Scholar

EPA, “New Source Review: Report to the President” (June 2002).Google Scholar

EPA, “Wisconsin Electric Power Company (WEPCO) Clean Air Act Civil Settlement” (April 2003).Google Scholar

EPA, “Allowance Markets Assessment: A Closer Look at the Two Biggest Price Changes in the Federal SO₂ and NO_X Allowance Markets,” White Paper (April 23, 2009).Google Scholar

EPA, “Acid Rain and Related Programs; 2009 Emission, Compliance, and Market Analyses” (September 2010).Google Scholar

EPA, “NOx Reductions Under Phase II of the Acid Rain Program,” at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/arp/reductions.html (last visited May 23, 2011).Google Scholar

EPRI, “Prospects for Boom/Bust in the U.S. Electric Power Industry” (December 2000).Google Scholar

EPRI, “Power System Dynamics Tutorial” (July 2009).Google Scholar

Eto, Joseph, “The Past, Present, and Future of U.S. Utility Demand-Side Management Programs,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-39931 (December 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eubanks II, William S., “The Clean Air Act's New Source Review Program: Beneficial to Public Health or Merely a Smoke-And-Mirrors Scheme?” 29 Journal of Land, Resources & Environmental Law 361 (2009).Google Scholar

Evans, David A., et al., “Modeling the Effects of Changes in New Source Review on National SO2 and NOX Emissions from Electricity-Generating Units,” Resources for the Future, DP 07–01 (March 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Joanne and Green, Richard, “Why Did British Electricity Prices Fall after 1998?” Working Paper (July 2005).Google Scholar

Eynon, Robert, Leckey, Thomas, and Hale, Douglas, “The Electric Transmission Network: A Multi-Region Analysis,” in EIA, Issues in Midterm Analysis and Forecasting, 2000.Google Scholar

Fabrizio, Kira M., Rose, Nancy L., and Wolfram, Catherine, “Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency,” American Economic Review 97 (September, 2007): 1250–77.Google Scholar

Fagan, Mark L., “Measuring and Explaining Electricity Price Changes in Restructured States,” Regulatory Policy Program Working Paper RPP-2006–02, Harvard (2006).Google Scholar

Fairman, James F. and Scott, John C., “Transmission, Power Pools, and Competition in the Electric Utility Industry,” 28 Hastings Law Journal 1159 (May 1977).Google Scholar

Fanelli, Daniele, “Negative Results are Disappearing from Most Disciplines and Countries,” Scientometrics 90 (2012): 891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fanelli, Daniele, “Positive' Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences,” PLoS One 5 (April 2010).Google ScholarPubMed

Farmer, R.G. and Allen, E.H., “Power System Dynamic Performance Advancement From History of North American Blackouts,” IEEE PSCE (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, Joseph and Klemperer, Paul, “Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects,” in Armstrong, Mark and Porter, Robert, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume 3 (Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2007): 1967–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faruqui, Ahmad, Chao, Hung-po, Niemeyer, Vic, Platt, Jeremy, and Stahlkopf, Karl, “Analyzing California's Power Crisis,” The Energy Journal 22 (2001): 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FBR Capital Markets, “Coal Retirements in Perspective – Quantifying the Upcoming EPA Rules” (December 13, 2010).Google Scholar

Felder, Frank A., “Incorporating Resource Dynamics to Determine Generation Adequacy Levels in Restructured Bulk Power Systems,” KIEE International Transactions on PE 4 (2004): 100–05.Google Scholar

Fellmeth, Robert C., “Plunging into Darkness: Energy Deregulation Collides with Scarcity,” 33 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 833 (2002).Google Scholar

FERC, “Regulating Independent Power Producers: A Policy Analysis” (October 13, 1987).Google Scholar

FERC, Office of Electric Power Regulation, “Power Pooling in the United States” (December 1981).Google Scholar

FERC, Staff, “Report on the Causes of Wholesale Electric Pricing Abnormalities in the Midwest during June 1998” (September 22, 1998).Google Scholar

FERC, Staff, “Investigation of Bulk Power Markets: ERCOT (Texas)” (November 1, 2000).Google Scholar

FERC, Staff, “Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Northwest Power Markets in November and December 2000” (February 1, 2001).Google Scholar

FERC, Staff, “Report to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Western Markets and the Causes of the Summer 2000 Price Abnormalities – Part 1” (November 1, 2000).Google Scholar

FERC, Staff, “Initial Report on Company-Specific Separate Proceedings and Generic Reevaluations; Published Natural Gas Price Data; and Enron Trading Strategies,” Docket No. PA02-2-000 (August 2002).Google Scholar

FERC, Staff, “Final Report on Price Manipulation in Western Markets,” Docket No. PA02-2-000 (March 2003).Google Scholar

First, Harry, “Regulated Deregulation: The New York Experience in Electric Utility Deregulation,” 33 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 911 (Summer 2002).Google Scholar

Fischel, William, “Why Are There NIMBYs?” Land Economics 77 (February 2001): 144–52.Google Scholar

Fisher, Alan, Johnson, Frederick, and Lande, Robert, “Price Effects of Horizontal Mergers,” 77 California Law Review 777 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

FitchRatings, “Corporates: Energy Future Holdings Corp” (April 27, 2009).Google Scholar

Fleisher, Jared, “ERCOT's Jurisdictional Status: A Legal History and Contemporary Appraisal,” 3 Texas Journal of Oil, Gas, and Energy Law 1 (2008).Google Scholar

Flowers, Marilyn, “Rent Seeking and Rent Dissipation: A Critical View,” Cato Journal 7 (Fall 1987): 431–40.Google Scholar

Fox, Loren, Enron: The Rise and Fall (Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2003).Google Scholar

Frank, Sue and Lewis, Gregory, “Government Employees: Working Hard or Hardly Working,” American Review of Public Administration 34 (March 2004): 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frayer, Julia, Ibrahim, Amr, Bahceci, Serkan, and Pecenkovic, Sanela, “A Comparative Analysis of Actual Locational Marginal Prices in the PJM Market and Estimated Short-Run Marginal Costs: 2003–2006” (January 31, 2007).Google Scholar

Fremeth, Adam and Holburn, Guy, “Information Asymmetries and Regulatory Decision Costs: Evidence From Electric Utility Rate Reviews 1980–2000,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 28 (Spring 2012): 127–62.Google Scholar

Gabaix, Xavier and Laibson, David, “Shrouded Attributes, Consumer Myopia, and Information Suppression in Competitive Markets,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (May 2006): 505–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

GAO, “Electric Powerplant Cancellations and Delays,” Report to the Congress (December 8, 1980).Google Scholar

GAO, “Electricity Supply: The Effect of Competitive Power Purchases Are Not Yet Certain” (August 23, 1990).Google Scholar

GAO, Older Plants' Impact on Reliability and Air Quality (Washington, DC, GPO, 1990).Google Scholar

GAO, Electricity Supply: Regulating Utility Holding Companies in a Changing Electric Industry (Washington, DC, GPO, 1992).Google Scholar

GAO, “No Evidence That Communications Between the FERC Chairman and the Chairman of Enron Corporation Violated Criminal Statutes or Ethics Regulations,” letter to Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, GAO-01–1020R (April 16, 2001).Google Scholar

GAO, Energy Markets: Concerted Actions Needed by FERC to Confront Challenges That Impede Effective Oversight (Washington, DC, GPO, 2002).Google Scholar

Geller, Howard and Attali, Sophie, The Experience With Energy Efficiency Policies and Programmes in IEA Countries (Paris, International Energy Agency, 2005).Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan and Malhotra, Neil, “Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What Is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (2008): 313–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerking, Shelby and Hamilton, Stephen, “What Explains the Increased Utilization of Powder River Basin Coal in Electric Power Generation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (November 2008): 933–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gifford, Daniel, “The New Deal Regulatory Model: A History of Criticisms and Refinements,” 68 Minnesota Law Review 299 (1993).Google Scholar

Gilbert, Richard, Kahn, Edward, and White, Matthew, “Coordination in the Wholesale Market: Where Does It Work?” Electricity Journal 6 (October 1993): 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillan, Stuart L. and Martin, John D., “Financial Engineering, Corporate Governance, and the Collapse of Enron,” University of Delaware College of Business and Economics, Center for Corporate Governance (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, Donald D., “Energy Efficiency Program Planning Workbook,” US DOE, EERE (December 2002).Google Scholar

Gillingham, Kenneth, Newell, Richard G., and Palmer, Karen, “Retrospective Examination of Demand-Side Energy Efficiency Policies,” Resources For the Future, DP 04–19 REV (September 2004).Google Scholar

Gilsdorf, Keith, “Vertical Integration Efficiencies and Electric Utilities: A Cost Complementarity Perspective,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 34 (Fall 1994): 261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glicksman, Robert and Schroeder, Christopher H., “EPA and the Courts: Twenty Years of Law and Politics,” 54 Law and Contemporary Problems 249 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Global Energy Decisions, “Putting Competitive Power Markets to the Test, The Benefits of Competition in America's Electric Grid: Cost Savings and Operating Efficiencies” (July 2005).Google Scholar

Goldman, Charles, Eto, Joseph, and Barbose, Galen, “California Customer Load Reductions during the Electricity Crisis: Did They Help to Keep the Lights On?” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL-49733 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, John, Noe, Paul, and Branch, Elizabeth, “Managing the Regulatory State: The Experience of the Bush Administration,” 33 Fordham Urban Law Journal 101 (2006).Google Scholar

Grainer, John and Lee, Stan, “Identification, Definition and Evaluation of Potential Impacts Facing the U.S. Electric Utility Industry Over the Next Decade,” Report for Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-SUB – 94–83 (November 26, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granovetter, Mark and McGuire, Patrick, “The Making of an Industry: Electricity in the United States,” in Callon, Michel, ed., The Laws of the Markets (London, Blackwell Publishers, 1988).Google Scholar

Green, Richard and Newbery, David, “Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market,” Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992): 929–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossback, Lawrence, Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David, “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion,” American Politics Research 31 (2003): 1–25.Google Scholar

Guber, Deborah Lynn, “Up and Down With Ecology Revisited: The Stability of Public Attitudes Towards Environmental Spending, 1973–1998,” 33rd Annual Meeting of the Northeast Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (November 8–10, 2001).Google Scholar

Guber, Deborah Lynn, “Voting Preferences and the Environment in the American Electorate,” Society and Natural Resources (2001): 455–69.Google Scholar

Hadsell, Lester and Shawky, Hany A., “Efficiency and Profit in the NYISO Transmission Congestion Contract Market,” Electricity Journal 30 (November 2009): 1–11.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Walton, “Affectation with Public Interest,” 39 Yale Law Journal 1089 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanger, John, “Reliability-Only Dispatch: Protecting Lives & Human Health While Ensuring System Reliability,” Clean Air Task Force (2011).Google Scholar

Harvey, Scott and Hogan, William, “On the Exercise of Market Power Through Strategic Withholding In California,” LECG (April 24, 2001).Google Scholar

Harvey, Scott and Hogan, William, “Identifying the Exercise of Market Power In California,” LECG (December 28, 2001).Google Scholar

Harvey, Scott and Hogan, William, “Market Power and Market Simulations,” LECG (July 17, 2002).Google Scholar

Harvey, Scott, McConihe, Bruce, and Pope, Susan, “Analysis of the Impact of Coordinated Electricity Markets on Consumer Electricity Charges,” LECG (November 20, 2006).Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona, “Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System,” 86 Iowa Law Review 101 (2001).Google Scholar

Hausman, Catherine, “Corporate Incentives and Nuclear Safety,” EI @ Hass Working Paper 223R (November 2011).Google Scholar

Hausman, Ezra and Tabors, Richard, “The Role of Demand Underscheduling in the California Energy Crisis,” Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausman, William J. and Neufeld, John L., “The Structure and Profitability of the US Electric Utility Industry at the Turn of the Century,” Business History 32 (1990): 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausman, William J. and Neufeld, John L., “The Market for Capital and the Origins of State Regulation of Electric Utilities in the United States,” Journal of Economic History 62 (December 2002): 1050–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausman, William J. and Neufeld, John L., “The Economics of Electricity Networks and the Evolution of the U.S. Electric Utility Industry, 1882–1935,” Business and Economic History On-line 2 (2004): 1–26.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Paul M., Yeoung-Jia Goo, James, and Chamberlain, William, “Vertical Economies: The Case of U.S. Electric Utility Industry, 1983–87,” Southern Economic Journal 63 (1997): 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegedus, Mark, “Points Well-Taken: Comments on Professor Peter Carstensen's Paper 'Creating Workably Competitive Wholesale Markets in Energy,” 1 Environmental & Energy Law & Policy Journal 145 (2006).Google Scholar

Henderson, J. Stephen, “Cost Estimation for Vertically Integrated Firms: The Cost of Electricity,” in Crew, M.A., ed., Analyzing the Impact of Regulatory Change in Public Utilities (Lexington, Lexington Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Hendry, David, “Applied Econometrics Without Sinning,” Journal of Economic Surveys 16 (2002): 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heutel, Garth, “Plant Vintages, Grandfathering, and Environmental Policy,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (2011): 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hey, Sonia and Rubin, Edward, “A Centurial History of Technological Change and Learning Curves for Pulverized Coal-Fired Utility Boilers,” Energy 32 (2007): 1996–2005.Google Scholar

Hillstrom, Kevin, U.S. Environmental Policy and Politics: A Documentary History (Washington, DC, CQ Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Hines, James, “Three Sides of Harberger Triangles,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (Spring 1999): 167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hines, Paul, A Decentralized Approach to Reducing the Social Costs of Cascading Failures, (Ph.D. Diss., Carnegie Mellon, August 2007).Google Scholar

Hines, Paul, Apt, Jay, and Talukdar, Sarosh, “Large Blackouts in North America: Historical Trends and Policy Implications,” CEIC Working Paper 09–01 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsh, Richard F., Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hirst, Eric, “U.S. Transmission Capacity: Present Status and Future Prospects,” prepared for the EEI and DOE (August 2004).Google Scholar

Hirst, Eric and Kirby, Brendan, “Unbundling Generation and Transmission Services for Competitive Electricity Markets,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory for NRRI (January 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirst, Eric and Kirby, Brendan, “Transmission Planning and the Need for New Capacity,” in DOE, National Transmission Grid Study: Issue Papers (May 2002).Google Scholar

Hogan, William, “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4 (1992): 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, William, “Electric Transmission: A New Model for Old Principles,” Electricity Journal 6 (March 1993): 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, William, “A Wholesale Pool Spot Market Must Be Administered by the Independent System Operator: Avoiding the Separation Fallacy,” Electricity Journal 8 (December 1995): 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, William, “Getting the Prices Right in PJM: Analysis and Summary: April 1998 through March 1999,” The First Anniversary of Full Locational Pricing, Kennedy, John F. School of Government, Harvard University (1999).Google Scholar

Hogan, William, “Electricity Market Restructuring: Reforms of Reforms,” paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference, Center for Research in Regulated Industries (May 25, 2001).Google Scholar

Hogan, William, Rosellón, Juan, and Vogelsang, Ingo, “Toward a Combined Merchant-Regulatory Mechanism for Electricity Transmission Expansion,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 38 (2010): 113–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoover, Kevin and Perez, Stephen, “Three Attitudes Toward Data Mining,” Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (2000): 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hortacsu, Ali, Madanizadeh, Seyed, and Puller, Steven, “Power to Choose: An Analysis of Choice Frictions in the Residential Electricity Market,” Working Paper (April 2012).Google Scholar

Hortacsu, Ali and Puller, Steven, “Understanding Strategic Bidding in Multi-Unit Auctions: A Case Study of the Texas Electricity Spot Market,” Rand Journal of Economics 39 (Spring 2008): 86–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert, “Regulatory Conflict in the Gilded Age: Federalism and the Railroad Problem,” 97 Yale Law Journal 1017 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howarth, Richard B., “Against High Interest Rates,” Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 0404 (March 2004).Google Scholar

Howes, John, “The Politics of Electric Power Deregulation,” Regulation (Winter 1992): 17–20.Google Scholar

Hsu, Shi-Ling, “The Real Problem With New Source Review,” 36 Environmental Law Reporter 10095 (2006).Google Scholar

Hubbell, Bryan, Crune, Richard, Evars, Dale, and Cohen, Jeff, “Regulation and Progress under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 4 (2010): 122–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huettner, David A. and Landon, John H., “Electric Utilities: Scale Economies and Diseconomies.” Southern Economic Journal 44 (1977): 883–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, George and Perich, Thomas J., “State of the Art: An Analysis of Portfolio Power Project Financing,” Project Finance Magazine – Power Report Supplement (September 2001).Google Scholar

Hyman, Leonard, “A Financial Postmortem: Ten Years of Electricity Restructuring,” Public Utilities Fortnightly (November 15, 2003): 10–15.Google Scholar

ICF, “Coal-Fired Electric Generation Unit Retirement Analysis,” Presented to the INGAA (May 18, 2010).Google Scholar

IEEE PES CAMS Task Force, “Initial Review of Methods for Cascading Failure Analysis in Electric Power Transmission Systems,” IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA (July 2008).Google Scholar

Investor Responsibility Research Center, “Survey of Non-Utility Electric Power Producers,” OTA (July 11, 1984).Google Scholar

Ishii, Jun, “Technology Adoption and Regulatory Regimes: Gas Turbine Electricity Generators from 1980 to 2001,” CSEM WP 128 (March 2004).Google Scholar

Ishii, Jun, “From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer,” CSEM, WP 108 (January 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isser, Steve, The Economics and Politics of the United States Oil Industry, 1920–1990: Profits, Populism, and Petroleum (New York, Garland Publishing, 1996).Google Scholar

Isser, Steve, “Electricity Deregulation: Kilowatts for Nothing and Your BTUs for Free,” Review of Policy Research 20 (2004): 217–36.Google Scholar

Itron, , “Assessment of the Feasible and Achievable Levels of Electricity Savings from Investor Owned Utilities in Texas: 2009–2018,” submitted to the PUCT (December 23, 2008).Google Scholar

Jaber, Makram B., “Utility Settlements in New Source Review Lawsuits,” 18 Natural Resources & Environment 22 (Winter 2004).Google Scholar

Jacobsen, Grant, “Do Economic Conditions Influence Environmental Policy? Evidence from the U.S. Senate,” Economic Letters 120 (2013): 167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobsen, Mark and Shaikh, Azeem, “Electricity Regulation in California and Input Market Distortions,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, SIEPR Discussion Paper 03-1 (2004).Google Scholar

Jacobson, Charles, “Expecting the Unexpected: Networks, Markets, and the Failure of Electric Utility Restructuring in California,” Business and Economic History On-line 2 (2004): 1–41.Google Scholar

Jandik, Tomas and Makhija, Anil, “Can Diversification Create Value? Evidence from the Electric Utility Industry,” Financial Management 34 (Spring 2005): 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johns, Stephen M., “Ossification's Demise? An Empirical Analysis of EPA Rulemaking from 2001–2005,” 38 Environmental Law 467 (2008).Google Scholar

Johnson, Erik, “Changing Issue Representation among Major United States Environmental Movement Organizations,” Rural Sociology 71 (March 2006): 132–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, P.M.S. and Woite, G., “Cost of Nuclear and Conventional Baseload Electricity Generation,” IAEA Bulletin 3 (1990): 18–23.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., The Determination of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory Hearing,” Bell Journal of Economics 3 (1972): 632–44.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “Pricing Decisions of Regulated Firms: A Behavioral Approach.” Bell Journal of Economics 4 (Spring 1973): 118–140.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “Regulatory Failure, Regulatory Reform, and Structural Change in the Electrical Power Industry,” Brookings Papers: Microeconomics (1989): 125–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “Why Do We Need Electricity Retailers? Or You Can Get It Cheaper Wholesale?” Revised Discussion Draft (February 13, 2000).Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “California's Electricity Crisis,” Harvard Energy Policy Group (September 28, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “The Difficult Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets in the U.S.,” CEEPR (May 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “Regulation and Deregulation after 25 Years: Lessons Learned for Research in Industrial Organization,” Review of Industrial Organization 26 (2005): 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul L., “Regulation of Natural Monopoly,” in Polinsky, Mitchell and Shavell, Steven, eds., Handbook of Law and Economics, Volume 2 (Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2007): 1227–1348.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Kahn, Edward, “Identifying the Exercise of Market Power: Refining the Estimates” Mimeo (July 5, 2001).Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Kahn, Edward, “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California's Wholesale Electricity Market during Summer 2000,” Energy Journal 23 (2002): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Rose, Nancy, “The Effects of Technological Change, Experience, and Environmental Regulation on the Construction Cost of Coal-Burning Generating Units,” Rand Journal of Economics 16 (Spring 1985): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Schmalansee, Richard, Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electrical Utility Deregulation (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Schmalansee, Richard, “The Political Economy of Market-Based Environmental Policy: The U.S. Acid Rain Program,” Journal of Law and Economics 41 (April 1998): 37–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Tirole, Jean, “Transmission Rights and Market Power on Electric Power Networks,” RAND Journal of Economics 31 (2000): 450–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joskow, Paul and Tirole, Jean, “Merchant Transmission Investment,” Journal of Industrial Economics 53 (June 2005): 233–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, Alfred, The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions (Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 1970).Google Scholar

Kahn, Edward, Stoft, Steven, Marnay, Chris, and Berman, Douglas, “Contracts For Dispatchable Power: Economic Implications for the Competitive Bidding Market,” LBNL (October 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, Matthew and Kotchen, Matthew, “Environmental Concern and the Business Cycle: The Chilling Effect of Recession,” NBER, Working Paper 16241 (July 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalt, Joseph and Zupan, Mark. “Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics.” American Economic Review 74 (June 1984): 279–300.Google Scholar

Kandel, Eugene, Kosenko, Konstantin, Morck, Randall, and Yafeh, Yishay, “Business Groups in the United States: A Revised History of Corporate Ownership, Pyramids and Regulation, 1930–1950,” NBER Working Paper 19691 (December 2013).Google Scholar

Kaplan, Stan, “Electric Power Transmission: Background and Policy Issues,” Congressional Research Service (April 14, 2009).Google Scholar

Kaserman, David L. and Mayo, John W., “The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry,” Journal of Industrial Economics 39 (September 1991): 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kehoe, Timothy J., Srinivasan, T.N. and Whalley, John, eds., Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelley, Sean, Leventis, Christo, and Weiss, Arthur, “The Failure of Risk Management: A New Perspective on the California Electricity Market,” Northwest University Research Paper (May 2001).Google Scholar

KEMA Consulting, “Analysis and Selection of Analytical Tools to Assess National-Interest Transmission Bottlenecks,” for DOE, (March 2003).Google Scholar

Ketzback, Thor, “The Evolution of Offsets and the Dawn of Emissions Trading Markets” (LLM Thesis, DePaul College of Law, May 1997).Google Scholar

Kim, E. Han, Morse, Adair, and Zingales, Luigi, “What Has Mattered to Economics Since 1970,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (Fall 2006): 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Joel I., “Making the Transition from Regulation to Competition: Thinking About Merger Policy During the Process of Electric Power Restructuring,” FERC Distinguished Speaker Series (January 21, 1998).Google Scholar

Kleit, Andrew and Reitzes, James, “The Effectiveness of FERC's Transmission Policy: Is Transmission Used Efficiently and When Is It Scarce?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 34 (2008): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleit, Andrew, Shcherbakova, Anastasia, and Chen, Xu, “Restructuring and the Retail Residential Market for Power in Pennsylvania,” Energy Policy 46 (2012): 443–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klemperer, Paul and Meyer, Margaret, “Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty,” Econometrica 57 (1989): 1243–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knittel, Christopher, “The Adoption of State Electricity Regulation: The Role Of Interest Groups,” Journal of Industrial Economics 54 (206): 201–22.Google Scholar

Kramer, Bruce M., “The 1970 Clean Air Amendments: Federalism in Action or Inaction,” 6 Texas Tech Law Review 47 (1974).Google Scholar

Kreps, David, Game Theory and Economic Modeling (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreuger, Anne, “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” American Economic Review 64 (June 1974): 291–303.Google Scholar

Kushler, Martin, York, Dan, and Witte, Patti, “Five Years In: An Examination of the First Half-Decade of Public Benefits Energy Efficiency Policies,” ACEEE (April 2004).Google Scholar

Kwoka, John, “Restructuring the U.S. Electric Power Sector: A Review of Recent Studies,” Review of Industrial Organization 32 (2008): 165–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwoka, John, Ozturk, Sanem, and Pollitt, Michael, “Divestiture Policy and Operating Efficiency in U.S. Electric Power Distribution,” EPRG Working Paper 0819 (July 2008).Google Scholar

Kwoka, John and Pollitt, Michael, “Industry Restructuring, Mergers, and Efficiency: Evidence from Electric Power,” CWPE (April 2007).Google Scholar

Ladd, Everett and Bowman, Karlyn, “Public Opinion on the Environment,” Resources 123 (1996): 5–7.Google Scholar

Laband, David and Tollison, Robert, “Dry Holes in Economic Research,” Kyklos 56 (2003): 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, Jennifer, Pease, Leah, Case, Ginny, and Sutton-Hetzel, Jennifer, “Energy Crisis in California: Options for the Future,” Pepperdine School of Public Policy (March 27, 2001).Google Scholar

Lamoreaux, Naomi, Raff, Daniel, and Temin, Peter, “New Economic Approaches to the Study of Business History,” Business and Economic History 26 (Fall 1997): 57–79.Google Scholar

Lange, Ian and Bellas, Allen S., “The 1990 Clean Air Act and the Implicit Price of Sulfur in Coal,” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 7 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lash, Joseph, Dealers and Dreamers: A New Look at the New Deal (New York, Doubleday, 1988).Google Scholar

Lasser, William, Benjamin V. Cohen, Architect of the New Deal (New Haven, Yale University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, Stephen M., “Assessing Evidence for the Averch-Johnson-Wellisz Effect for Regulated Utilities,” Atlantic Canada Economics Association Papers and Proceedings (2008).Google Scholar

LCG Consulting, “Modeling Competitive Energy Markets In California: An Analysis of Restructuring,” for the CEC (October 11, 1996).Google Scholar

Leamer, Edward, “Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics,” American Economic Review 73 (March 1983): 31–43.Google Scholar

Ledgerwood, Shaun and Harris, Dan, “A Comparison of Anti-Manipulation Rules in U.S. and EU Electricity and Natural Gas Markets: A Proposal for a Common Standard,” 33 Energy Law Journal 1 (2012).Google Scholar

Lenard, Thomas, “Getting the Transcos Right,” Electricity Journal 11 (November 1998): 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesser, Jonathan A., “The Used and Useful Test: Implications for a Restructured Electricity Industry,” 23 Energy Law Journal 349 (2002).Google Scholar

Lesser, Jonathan A., “Bad Economics, by Any Other Name, is Still Bad: APPA's Analysis of Wholesale Electric Competition is Flawed,” Briefing Paper No. 2009-08-01 (August 2009).Google Scholar

Lindblom, Charles, “The Science of ‘Muddling Through',” Public Administration Review 19 (1959): 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindblom, Charles, “Still Muddling, Not Yet Through,” Public Administration Review 39 (1979): 517–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsey, Richard G., “Reflections on the General Theory of Second Best at Its Golden Jubilee,” International Tax and Public Finance 14 (2007): 349–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsey, Richard G. and Lancaster, Kevin, “The General Theory of Second Best,” Review of Economic Studies 24 (1956): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littlechild, Stephen “Merchant and Regulated Transmission: Theory, Evidence and Policy,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 42 (2012): 308–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Xin, “The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: A Historical Perspective on Its Role in Environmental Protection,” (Ph.D Diss., Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 2010).Google Scholar

Lo, Andrew W. and Mueller, Mark T., “WARNING: Physics Envy May Be Hazardous to Your Wealth!” Sloan School of Management, MIT, unpublished working paper (March 19, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lockyer, Bill, “Attorney General's Energy White Paper: A Law Enforcement Perspective on the California Energy Crisis” (April 2004), at http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/publications/energywhitepaper.pdf (last visited November 20, 2014).Google Scholar

Lovins, Amory, “Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken?” Foreign Affairs 55 (October 1976): 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyon, Thomas and Mayo, John, “Regulatory Opportunism and Investment Behavior: Evidence From the U.S. Electric Utility Industry,” Rand Journal of Economics 36 (2005): 628–44.Google Scholar

Macedonia, Jennifer, Kruger, Joe, Long, Lourdes, and McGuinness, Meghan, “Environmental Regulation and Electric System Reliability,” Staff Report of the Bipartisan Policy Center, June 2011.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology,” Theory and Society 29 (2000): 507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, Paul, “The Public Utility Pyramids,” 41 Journal of Legal Studies 37 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansur, Eric, “Measuring Welfare in Restructured Electricity Markets,” NBER Working Paper No. 13509 (October 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansur, Eric and White, Matthew, “Market Organization and Efficiency in Electricity Markets,” Yale School of Management Working Paper (June 30, 2009).Google Scholar

Mansur, Erin, “Upstream Competition and Vertical Integration in Electricity Markets,” 50 Journal of Law and Economics 125 (February 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAfee, Preston and McMillan, John, “Auctions and Bidding,” Journal of Economic Literature 25 (June 1987): 699–738.Google Scholar

McAfee, Preston and McMillan, John, “Competition and Game Theory,” Journal of Marketing Research 33 (August 1996): 263–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McArthur, John Burritt, “The Irreconcilable Differences Between FERC's Natural Gas and Electricity Stranded Cost Treatments,” 46 Buffalo Law Review 71 (Winter 1998).Google Scholar

McCabe, Mark J., “Principals, Agents, and the Learning Curve: The Case of Steam-Electric Power Plant Design and Construction,” Journal of Industrial Economics 44 (December 1996): 360–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McChesney, Fred, “Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1987): 101–09.Google Scholar

McClosky, Deirde, “The Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: A Comment on Zerbe and Medema,” in Medema, Steven G., ed., Coasean Economics (Boston, Kluwer, 1992).Google Scholar

McCloskey, Donald, “Does the Past Have Use Economics?” Journal of Economic History (1976): 434–61.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew, Noll, Rogers, and Weingast, Barry, “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 3 (1987): 243–77.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew, Noll, Rogers, and Weingast, Barry, “Structure and Process, Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements And The Political Control Of Agencies,” 75 Virginia Law Review 431 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew and Schwartz, Thomas, “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal Political Science 28 (1984): 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCullough, B.D., “Replication Section: Introduction,” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 31 (2006): 103–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGraw, Thomas, “Regulation in America: A Review Article,” Business History Review 49 (1975): 159–83.Google Scholar

McGraw, Thomas, Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

McKitrick, Ross, “Why Did US Air Pollution Decline after 1970?” Empirical Economics 33 (2006): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNerney, James, Trancik, Jessika, and Farmer, J. Doyne, “Historical Costs of Coal-Fired Electricity and Implications for the Future,” Energy Policy 39 (2011): 3042–54.Google Scholar

Meadows, Donela H., Meadows, Dennis L., Randers, Jorgen, and Behrens, William W., The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind (New York, Universe Books, 1972).Google Scholar

Meese, Alan J., “Reframing Antitrust in Light of Scientific Revolution: Accounting for Transaction Costs in Rule of Reason Analysis,” 62 Hastings Law Journal 466 (2010).Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep, Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act (Washington, DC, Brookings Institute, 1983).Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas, “Article III, Agency Adjudication, and the Origins of the Appellate Review Model of Administrative Law,” 111 Columbia Law Review 939 (June 2011).Google Scholar

Meyer, David H. and Sedano, Richard, “Transmission Siting and Permitting,” in DOE, National Transmission Grid Study: Issue Papers (May 2002).Google Scholar

Meyer, Rolan, “Benchmarking Economies of Vertical Integration in U.S. Electricity Supply: An Application of DEA,” Jacobs University Bremen (October 17, 2010).Google Scholar

Meyers, Stephen, McMahon, James, and McNeil, Michael, “Realized and Prospective Impacts of U.S. Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential Appliances: 2004 Update,” LBNL (May 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, Thomas and Sunstein, Cass, “The Real World of Arbitrariness Review,” 75 University of Chicago Law Review 761 (2008).Google Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (Summer 1989): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, Paul, “What the Seller Won't Tell You: Persuasion and Disclosure in Markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (Spring 2008): 115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, John, “A Needed Reform of the Organization and Regulation of the Interstate Electric Power Industry,” 38 Fordham Law Review 635 (1970).Google Scholar

MJ Bradley & Associates and Analysis Group, “Ensuring a Clean, Modern Electric Generating Fleet While Maintaining Electric System Reliability,” prepared for the Clean Energy Group (August 2010).Google Scholar

Monitoring Analytics, LLC, State of the Market Report for PJM (various years).Google Scholar

Montero, Juan-Pablo, “Voluntary Compliance with Market-Based Environmental Policy: Evidence from the U.S. Acid Rain Program,” Journal of Political Economy 107 (1999): 999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moody's Investment Service, “The Importance of Being Economic: Credit Risks of US Merchant Power Plants” (May 1999).Google Scholar

Mooz, William, “Cost Analysis of Light Water Reactor Power Plants,” Rand for the Department of Energy, R-2304-DOE (June 1978).Google Scholar

Morey, Edward R., “Confuser Surplus,” American Economic Review 74 (March 1984): 163–73.Google Scholar

Munster, Christophe, Divestiture and Operating Efficiency of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (MS Thesis, Humboldt University, January 2011).Google Scholar

Nadel, Steve and Goldstein, David, “Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards: History, Impacts, Current Status, and Future Directions,” ACEEE (1996).Google Scholar

Napolitano, Sam, et al., “The U.S. Acid Rain Program: Key Insights from the Design, Operation, and Assessment of a Cap-and-Trade Program,” Electricity Journal 20 (2007): 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narula, Ram, Massy, Martin, and Singh, Jyoti, “Design Considerations for Combined Cycle Plants for the Deregulated Market – An EPC Contractor's Perspective,” ASME Turbo Expo (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, Jonathan and Revesz, Richard, “Grandfathering and Environmental Regulation: the Law and Economics of New Source Review,” 101 Northwestern University Law Review 1677 (2007).Google Scholar

Nauman, Ilias and Reynolds, Robert, “Changing Conduct with Changing Demand: Evidence of Coordination among Suppliers of Electricity in California in 2000,” Brattle Group (2007).Google Scholar

Navarro, Peter, “The 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments: Energy, Environmental, Economic, and Distributional Impacts,” Public Policy 29 (1981): 121–46.Google Scholar

Neal, Larry, “A Shocking View of Economic History,” Journal of Economic History 60 (June 2000): 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Olof S. and Sant, Roger W., “Two IPP Points of View,” Public Utilities Fortnightly (June 1, 1993).Google Scholar

Nelson, Robert H., “Environmental Religion: A Theological Critique,” 55 Case Western Reserve Law Review 51 (2004).Google Scholar

NERA, “Potential Impacts of EPA Air, Coal Combustion Residuals, and Cooling Water Regulations,” prepared for American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (September 2011).Google Scholar

NERC, “Generation & Transmission Reliability Planning Models Task Force Final Report on Methodology and Metrics” (December 8, 2010), at http://www.nerc.com/comm/PC/Reliability%20Assessment%20Subcommittee%20RAS%20DL/GTRPMTF_Meth__Metrics_Report_final_w%20_PC_approvals_revisions_12%2008%2010.pdf (last visited November 20, 2014).Google Scholar

NERC, Long-Term Reliability Assessments (various years).Google Scholar

Newbery, David, “Electricity Liberalisation in Britain: The Quest for a Satisfactory Wholesale Market Design,” Energy Journal 26 (2005): 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noll, Roger G. and Owen, Bruce M., eds., The Political Economy of Deregulation: Interest Groups in the Regulatory Process (Washington, DC, AEI, 1983).Google Scholar

North, Douglass, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, Douglass, “Economic Performance Though Time,” American Economic Review 84 (1994): 359–68.Google Scholar

Nostrand, James Van, “Constitutional Limitations on the Ability of States to Rehabilitate Their Failed Electric Utility Restructuring Plans,” 31 Seattle University Law Review 593 (2008).Google Scholar

Nowell, Clifford and Tschirhart, John, “The Public Utility Regulatory Act and Regulatory Behavior,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 2 (1990): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

NPS Energy Management, “Alternative Models of Electric Power Deregulation,” for EEI (May 1982).Google Scholar

Nwaeze, Emeka, “Public Utility Regulation in the U.S. and Asymmetric Return Responses to Positive and Negative Abnormal Earnings,” Multinational Finance Journal 2 (1998): 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nye, David, When the Lights When Out: A History of Blackouts in America (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2010).Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Arthur J., Soul of the Grid: A Cultural Biography of the California Independent System Operator (Lincoln, I Universe, 2003).Google Scholar

Office of Technology Assessment, “Electric Power Wheeling and Dealing: Technological Considerations for Increasing Competition,” OTA-E-409 (May 1989).Google Scholar

Olsen, Johan, “Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review 95 (March 2001): 191–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oren, Shmuel S., “Ensuring Generation Adequacy in Competitive Electricity Market,” University of California Energy Institute, WP 007 (June 2003).Google Scholar

Oren, Shmuel S., et al., “Nodal Prices and Transmission Rights: A Critical Appraisal,” The Electricity Journal 8 (April 1995): 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrow, Ahira, “Process Preemption in Federal Siting Regimes,” 48 Harvard Journal on Legislation 289 (2011).Google Scholar

Pace, Joe E. and Landon, John H., “Introducing Competition into the Electric Utility Industry: An Economic Appraisal,” 3 Energy Law Journal 1 (1982).Google Scholar

Page, Scott, “Path Dependence,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (2006): 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pandey, Sanjay and Stazyk, Edmund, “Antecedents and Correlates of Public Service Motivation,” in Perry, James L. and Hondeghem, Annie, eds., Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Park, Hyunsoo, The Social Structure of Large Scale Blackouts: Changing Environment, Institutional Imbalance, and Unresponsive Organizations (Ph.D. Diss., Rutgers University, October 2010).Google Scholar

Pashigian, Peter, “Environmental Regulation: Whose Self-Interests Are Being Protected?” Economic Inquiry 23 (October 1985): 551–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peltzman, Sam, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” 19 Journal of Law and Economics 211 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perez-Gonzalez, Francisco, “Organizational Form and Firm Performance: Evidence from the ‘Death Sentence’ Clause of the Public Utility Act of 1935” (April 2014).Google Scholar

Perino, Grischa, “Price Discrimination Based on Downstream Regulation: Evidence from the Market for SO2 Scrubbers,” Centre for Competition Policy, Working Paper 10–9 (July 9, 2010).Google Scholar

Perloff, Jeffrey, Karp, Larry, and Golan, Amos, Estimating Market Power and Strategies (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pesendorfer, Wolfgang, “Behavioral Economics Comes of Age: A Review Essay on Advances in Behavioral Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature 64 (September 2006): 712–21.Google Scholar

Pfeifenberger, Johannes, et al., “Review of PJM's Reliability Pricing Model (RPM),” Brattle Group for PJM (June 30, 2008).Google Scholar

Pfeifenberger, Johannes, et al., “Second Performance Assessment of PJM's Reliability Pricing Model,” Prepared for PJM by the Brattle Group (August 26, 2011).Google Scholar

Pierce, Jr., Richard J., “The Regulatory Treatment of Mistakes in Retrospect: Canceled Plants and Excess Capacity,” 132 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 497 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, Jr., Richard J., “A Proposal to Deregulate the Market For Bulk Power,” 72 Virginia Law Review 1183 (October 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, Jr., Richard J., “Public Utility Regulatory Takings: Should the Judiciary Attempt To Police the Political Institutions?,” 77 Georgetown Law Journal 2031 (1989).Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul, “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” American Political Science Review 94 (2000): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pindyck, Robert, “Sunk Costs and Risk-Based Barriers to Entry,” NBER Working Paper #14755 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

PJM Market Monitoring Unit, State of the Market Report (various years).Google Scholar

Pollitt, G. M., Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities: The International Evidence on Privatization and Efficiency (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Polsby, Nelson W., “Where Do You Get Your Ideas?” PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (1993): 83–87.Google Scholar

Pope, Susan L., “California Electricity Price Spikes: An Update on the Facts,” Harvard Electricity Policy Group (December 12, 2002).Google Scholar