Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 4
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      15 December 2024
      19 December 2024
      ISBN:
      9781009270052
      9781009500401
      9781009270076
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.26kg, 70 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.14kg, 70 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    The significance of our physical bodies is an important topic in contemporary philosophy and theology. Reflection on the body often assumes, even if only implicitly, idealizations that obscure important facts about what it means for humans to be 'enfleshed.' This Element explores a number of ways that reflection on bodies in their concrete particularities is important. It begins with a consideration of why certain forms of idealization are philosophically problematic. It then explores how a number of features of bodies can reveal important truths about human nature, embodiment, and dependence. Careful reflection on the body raises important questions related to community and interdependence. The Element concludes by exploring the ethical demands we face given human embodiment. Among other results, this Element exposes the reader to a wide diversity of human embodiment and the nature of human dependence, encouraging meaningful theological reflection on aspects of the human condition.

    References

    Amy, N. K., Aalborg, A., Lyons, P., & Keranen, L. (2006). Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for white and African-American obese women. International Journal of Obesity, 30(1), 147155.
    Anderson, J. (2014). Autonomy and vulnerability entwined. In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 134161). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    , Aristotle. (2017). Politics (trans. Jowett, Benjamin, Ed.). New York: Digireads.
    Baltes, M. M. (1995). Dependency in old age: Gains and losses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1419.
    Balwin, J. (1992). The fire next time. New York: Vintage.
    Barnes, E. (2016). The minority body: A theory of disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Baynton, D. (2001). Disability and the justification of inequality in American history. In Longmore, P. K., & Umansky, L. (Eds.), The new disability history: American perspectives (pp. 3357). New York: New York University Press.
    Beaudoin, J. (2007). The world’s continuance: Divine conservation or existential inertia? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 61, 8398.
    Bowen-Evans, K. (2022). How Brian Brock’s hermeneutic of disability is relevant to all marginalsed bodies. Journal of Disability & Religion, 26(2), 165175.
    Bowman Jr., D. (2021). On the spectrum: Autism, faith, & the gifts of neuodiversity. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
    Boyer, A. (2019). The undying. New York: Farrar, Strause and Giroux.
    Bynum, C. W. (1995). The resurrection of the body in western christianity, 200–1336. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Byrom, B. (2004). A vision of self support: Disability and the rehabilitation movement of progressive America. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
    Campbell, S. M., & Stramondo, J. A. (2017). The complicated relationship of disability and well-being. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27(2), 151184.
    Carel, H. (2019). Illness: The cry of the flesh (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    Chambers, C. (2022). Intact: A defence of the unmodified body. Milton Keynes: Allen Lane.
    Chatzidakis, A., Hakim, J., Littler, J., Rottenberg, C., & Segal, L. (2020). The care manifesto: The politics of interdependence. London: Verso.
    Chouinard, V. (1997). Making space for disabling differenced: Challenging ableist geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(4), 379387.
    Clare, E. (2017). Brilliant imperfection: Grappling with cure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Clark-Soles, J. (2017). John, first – third john, and revelation. In Melcher, S. J., Parsons, M. C., & Yong, A. (Eds.), The bible and disability: A commentary (pp. 333378). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
    Connolly, M. (2001). Female embodiment and clinical practice. In Toombs, S. K. (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 177196). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
    The cooperative human. (2018). Nature Human Behavior, 2, 427428. www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0389-1.
    Cooreman-Guittin, T. (2021). Looking at dependence: Vulnerability and power in the gospel of the foot washing. Journal of Disability & Religion, 25(1), 414.
    Crisp, O. D., & Strobel, K. C. (2018). Jonathan Edwards: An introduction to his thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.
    Dea, S. (2016). Beyond the binary: Thinking about sex and gender. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
    Descartes, R. (1993). Meditations on first philosophy (trans. Cross, Donald A., , Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
    Dodds, S. (2007). Depending on care: Recognition of vulnerability and the social contribution of care provision. Bioethics, 21(9), 500510.
    Dodds, S. (2014). Dependence, care, and vulnerability. In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 181203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Dyke, C. V. (2020). Taking the “dis” out of disability: Martyrs, mothers, and mystics in the middle ages. In Williams, S. M. (Ed.), Disability in medieval christian philosophy and theology (pp. 203232). New York: Routledge.
    Eyler, J. R. (2010). Introduction: Breaking boundaries, building bridges. In Eyler, J. R. (Ed.), Disability in the middle ages: Reconsiderations and reverberations (pp. 18). New York: Routledge.
    Fessenden, T. (1999). The soul of America: Whiteness and the disappearing of bodies in the progressive era. In Weiss, G., & Haber, H. F. (Eds.), Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture (pp. 2340). New York: Routledge.
    Fineman, M. (2000). Cracking the foundational myths: Independence, autonomy and self-sufficiency. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, & the Law, 8(13), 1229.
    Fineman, M. (2004). The autonomy myth: A theory of dependency. New York: New Press.
    Fisher, S. (1973). Body consciousness: You are what you feel. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Flint, S. W. (2015). Obesity stigma: Prevalence and impact in healthcare. British Journal of Obesity, 1, 1418.
    Formosa, P. (2014). The role of vulnerabiliby in Kantian ethics. In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 88109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Frye, M. (1983). Oppression. In Politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory (pp. 116). New York: Crossing Press.
    Gaudet, M. (2017). On “and vulnerable”: Catholic social thought and the social challenges of cognitive disability. Journal of Moral Theology, 6(2), 5253.
    Glenn, E. N. (2010). Forced to care: Coercion and caregiving in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Gordon, A. (2020). What we don’t talk about when we talk about fat. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    Grimes, K. W. (2016). Christ divided: Antiblackness as corporate vice. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
    Grue, J. (2023, March 14). The disabled villain: Why sensitivity reading can’t kill off this ugly trope. Retrieved March 14, 2023, from www.theguardian.com/news/2023/mar/14/the-disabled-villain-why-sensitivity-reading-cant-kill-off-this-ugly-trope
    Hahn, H. (1995). The appearance of physical difference: A new agenda for research on politics and disability. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 17(4), 391415.
    Hall, S. S., MacMichael, J., & Turner, A. (2017). A survey of the impact of owning a service dog on quality of life for individuals with physical and hearing disability: A pilot study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 59.
    Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1993). Beauty and the labour market. National Bureau of Economic Research Paper Series, working paper 4518, 146.
    Hardy, K. A. (2023). Five ways health care can be better for fat people. AMA Journal of Ethics, 25(7), 528534.
    Harris, J. E. (2019). The aesthetics of disability. Columbia Law Review, 119(4), 895971.
    Hehir, T. (2002). Eliminating ableism in education. Harvard Educational Review, 72(1), 133.
    Heyes, C. J. (2021). The body. In Hall, K. Q., & , Ásta (Eds.), The oxford handbook of feminist philosophy (pp. 350362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Holcomb, J., & Latham-Mintus, K. (2022). Disney and disability: Media representations of disability in Disney and Pixar animated films. Disability Studies Quarterly, 42(1).
    Holmes, K. (2020). Mismatch: How inclusion shapes design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    House, S. (1981). A radical feminist model of psychological disability. Off Our Backs, 11(5), 3435.
    Huebner, B. (2016). Review of Cognitive Pluralism, by Steven Horst. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved Feburary 1, 2023, from https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/cognitive-pluralism/
    Jacobs, A. E. (2023). How body mass index comprises care of patients with disabilities. AMA Journal of Ethics, 25(7), 545549.
    Kapic, K. M. (2022). You’re only human. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
    Kaposy, C. (2018). Choosing down syndrome: Ethics and new prenatal testing technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Kaposy, C. (2019). The ethical line for down syndrome testing. Policy Options. Retrieved April 25, 2023, from https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/april-2019/the-ethical-line-for-down-syndrome-testing/
    Kenney, E. L., Gortmaker, S. L., Davison, K. K., & Bryn Austin, S. (2015). The academic penalty for gaining weight: A longitudinal, change-in-change analysis of BMI and perceived academic ability in middle school students. International Journal of Obesity, 39, 14081409.
    Kenny, A. (2022). My body is not a prayer request: Disability justice in the church. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
    Kittay, E. F. (1998). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependence. New York: Routledge.
    Kittay, E. F. (2019). Learning from my daughter: The value and care of disabled minds. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Kristiva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (trans. Roudiez, Leon S., Ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
    Kukla, Q. R. (2009). The phrenological impulse and the morphology of character. In Campbell, S., Meynell, L., & Sherwin, S. (Eds.), Embodiment and agency (pp. 7699). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Kukla, Q. R. (2022). What counts as a disease, and why does it matter? The Journal of Philosophy of Disability, 2, 127.
    Kumari Campbell, F. (2009). Countours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Kvanvig, J. L., & McCann, H. J. (1988). Divine conservation and the persistence of the world. In Morris, T. V. (Ed.), Divine and human actions: Essays in the metaphysics of theism (pp. 1349). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Leder, D. (1990). The absent body. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Leduc, A. (2020). Disfigured: On fairy tales, disability, and making space. Toronto: Coach House Books.
    Lehrer, R. (2020). Golem girl: A memoir. New York: One World.
    Leporrier, N., Herrou, M., Morello, R., & Leymarie, P. (2003). Fetuses with down’s syndrome detected by prenatal screening are more likely to abort spontaneously than fetuses with down’s syndrome not detected by prenatal screening. BJOG, 110(1), 1821.
    Lewis, T. A. (2020). Ableism: An updated definition. www.talilalewis.com/blog/ableism-2020-an-updated-definition.
    Linton, D. (2013). The menstrual masquerade. In Brune, J. A., & Wilson, D. J. (Eds.), Disability and passing: Blurring the lines of identity (pp. 5870). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    Lorde, A. (1980). The cancer journals. New York: Penguin Books.
    MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Peru, IL: Carus.
    Mackenzie, C. (2014). The importance of relational autonomy and capabilities for an ethics of vulnerability. In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 3359). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.). (2014a). Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (2014b). What is vulnerability, and why does it matter for moral theory? In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Manne, K. (2024). Unshrinking: How to face fatphobia. New York: Crown.
    Martin, A. (2017). 49 states legally allow employers to discriminate based on weight. Time.
    McGee, S. (2014). For women, being 13 pounds overweight means losing $9,000 a year in salary. Retrieved July 14, 2023, from www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2014/oct/30/women-pay-get-thin-study
    McGuire, A. (2016). War on autism: On the cultural logic of normative violence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    McKirland, C. L. (2022). God’s provision, humanity’s need: The gift of our dependence. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
    McMahan, J., & Singer, P. (2017, April 3). Who is the victim in the anna stubblefield case? The New York Times.
    McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.
    Melcher, S. J. (2017). Introduction. In Melcher, S. J., Parsons, M. C., & Yong, A. (Eds.), The bible and disability: A commentary (pp. 127). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
    Metzler, I. (2005). Disability in medieval Europe: Thinking about physical impairment in the high middle ages, c. 1100–c.1400. New York: Routledge.
    Meynell, L. (2009). Introduction: Minding bodies. In Campbell, S., Meynell, L., & Sherwin, S. (Eds.), Embodiment and agency (pp. 121). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Miller, S. C. (2012). The ethics of need: Agency, dignity, and obligation. New York: Routledge.
    Millgram, E. (2022). Bounded agency. In Ferrero, L. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of agency (pp. 6876). New York: Routledge.
    Mills, J. S., Shannon, A., & Hogue, J. (2017). Beauty, body image, and the media. In Levine, M. P. (Ed.), Perception of beauty (pp. 145157). London: Intechopen.
    Mitchell, D. T. (1999). Foreword. In Stiker, H.- J. (Ed.), A History of Disability (pp. viixiv). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Mizrahi, M. (2019). If analytic philosophy of religion is sick, can it be cured? Religious Studies, 56(4), 558577.
    Mollow, A. (2022). Hunger always wins: Contesting the medicalization of fat bodies. In Reynolds, J. M., & Wieseler, C. (Eds.), The disability bioethics reader (pp. 254262). New York: Routledge.
    Murray, S. (2008). The “fat” female body. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    Natoli, J. L., Ackerman, D. L., McDermott, S., & Edwards, J. G. (2012). Prenatal diagnosis of down syndrome: A systematic review of termination rates (1995–2011). Prenatal Diagnosis, 32(2), 142153.
    Nishida, A. (2022). Just care: Messy entanglements of disability, dependency, and desire. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
    Pfeifer, C. (2012). Physical attractiveness, employment and earnings. Applied Economics Letters, 19(6), 505510.
    Phelan, S. M., Burgess, D. J., Yeazel, M. W., et al. (2015). Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obesity Reviews, 16(4), 319326.
    Phelan, S. M., Dovidio, J. F., Puhl, R. M., et al. (2014). Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: The medical student changes study. Obesity, 22(4), 12011208.
    , Plato. (2002). Five dialogues: Euthryphro, Apoogy, Crito, Meno, Phaedo (trans. , G. Grube, M. A., Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
    Ratliffe, M. (2008). Touch and situatedness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16(3), 299322.
    Reiheld, A. (2015). With all due caution: Global anti-obesity campaigns and the individualization of responsibility. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 8(2), 226249.
    Reynolds, J. M. (2022). The life worth living: Disability, pain, and morality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Rubino, F., Puhl, R. M., Cummings, D. E., et al. (2020). Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of disability. Nature Medicine, 26, 485497.
    Russell, M. (2019). Capitalism & disability: Selected writings by Martha Russell (Rosenthal, K., Ed.). Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
    Saguy, A. C. (2013). What’s wrong with fat. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Salim, E., & Malik, S. A. (2022). Creatio Continua and quantum randomness. In Clark, K. J., & Koperski, J. (Eds.), Abrahamic reflections on randomness and providence (pp. 243264). New York: Springer.
    Schmitz, B. (2014). “something else?”–cognitive disability and the human form of life. In Bickenbach, J. E., Felder, F., & Schmitz, B. (Eds.), Disability and the good human life (pp. 5071). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Schweik, S. M. (2009). The ugly laws: Disability in public. New York: New York University Press.
    Scott, E. (2001). Unpicking a myth: The infanticide of female and disabled infants in antiquity. In Davies, G., Gardner, A., & Lockyear, K. (Eds.), Trac 2000: Proceedings of the tenth annual theoretical roman archaeology conference (pp. 143151). Oxford: Oxbow Books.
    Scully, J. L. (2014). Disability and vulnerability: On bodies, dependence, and power. In Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (Eds.), Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy (pp. 204221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Shakespeare, T. (2014). Nasty, brutish, and short? On the predicament of disability and embodiment. In Bickenbach, J. E., Felder, F., & Schmitz, B. (Eds.), Disability and the good human life (pp. 93112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Shapiro, J. P. (1994). No pity. New York: Three Rivers Press.
    Siebers, T. (2003). What can disability studies learn from the culture wars? Cultural Critique, 55, 182216.
    Sierminska, E. (2015). Does it pay to be beautiful? IZA World of Labor, 161.
    Simmons, J. A. (2019). The strategies of christian philosophy. In Simmons, J. A. (Ed.), Christian philosophy: Conceptions, continuations, and challenges (pp. 187207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Smith, J. K. A. (2021). The nicene option: An incarnational phenomenology. Waco: Baylor University Press.
    Snead, O. C. (2020). What it means to be human: The case for the body in public bioethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Sole-Smith, V. (2023). Fat talk: Parenting in the age of diet culture. New York: Henry Hold.
    Solomon, A. (2012). Far from the tree: Parents, children, and the search for identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Stiker, H.-J. (2000). A history of disability (trans. Sayers, William, , Ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Suchocki, M. H. (1994). The fall to violence: Original sin in relational theology (New York ed.). London: Continuum.
    Sullivan-Dunbar, S. (2017). Human dependency and christian ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Swartz, K., Lutfiyya, Z. M., & Hansen, N. (2013). Dopey’s legacy: Stereotypical portrayals of intellectual disability in the classic animated films. In Cheu, J. (Ed.), Diversity in Disney films: Critical essays on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and disability (pp. 179194). Jefferson: McFarland.
    Swinton, J., Mowat, H., & Baines, S. (2011). Whose story am I? Redescribing profound intellectual disability in the kingdom of god. Journal of Religion, Disability and Health, 15, 519.
    Taylor, S. R. (2018). The body is not an apology: The power of radical self-love. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
    Thompson, C. (2015). The soul of shame: Retelling the stories we believe about ourselves. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
    Thomson, R. G. (Ed.). (1996). Freakery: Cultural spectacles of the extraordinary body. New York: New York University Press.
    Thomson, R. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Timpe, K. (2018). Disability and inclusive communities. Grand Rapids, MI: Calvin Press.
    Timpe, K. (2020). Defiant afterlife–disability and uniting ourselves to god. In Panchuk, M., & Rea, M. C. (Eds.), Voices from the edge: Centering marginalized perspectives in analytic theology (pp. 206231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Tomiyama, A. J., Carr, D., Granberg, E. M., et al. (2018). How and why weight stigma drives the obesity “epidemic” and harms health. BMC Medicine, 16(123), 16.
    Toombs, S. K. (2001). Reflections on bodily change: The lived experience of disability. In Toombs, S. K. (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 247262). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
    Torrance, A. J. (2022). Foreward. In McKirland, C. L. (Ed.), God’s provision, humanity’s need: The gift of our dependence (pp. ixxii). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
    Tremain, S. L. (2017). Foucault and feminist philosophy of disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Tylka, T. L., Annunziato, R. A., Burgand, D., et al. (2014). The weight-inclusive vs. weight-normative approach to health: Evaluating the evidence for prioritizing well-being over weight loss. Journal of Obesity, 2014, 118.
    Urla, J., & Terry, J. (1995). Introduction: Mapping embodied deviance. In Urla, J., & Terry, J. (Eds.), Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture (pp. 118). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Van Dyke, C. (2020). Taking the “Dis” Out of Disability: Martyrs, Mothers, and Mystics. In Williams, S. (Ed.), Disability in Medieval Christian Philosophy and Theology (pp. 203232). New York: Routledge.
    Van Dyke, C. (2022). A hidden wisdom: Medieval contemplatives on self-knowledge, reason, love, persons, and immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Wallace, D. F. (2009). This is water. New York: Little, Brown.
    Wangelin, H. (2021). What I wish my parents knew about being their autistic daughter. In Ballou, E. P., daVanport, S., & Onaiwu, M. G. (Eds.), Sincerely, your autistic child (pp. 3146). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.
    Wendell, S. (2001). Unhealthy disability: Treating chronic illness as disabilities. Hypatia, 16(4), 1733.
    Widdows, H. (2018). Perfect me: Beauty as an ethical ideal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Wieseler, C. (2019). Challenging conceptions of the “normal” subject in phenomenology. In Lee, E. S. (Ed.), Race as phenomena: Between phenomenology and philosophy of race (pp. 6985). London: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: William Morrow.
    Wright, N. (2008). Surprised by hope. New York: HarperOne.
    Wright, N. (2017, June). History, eschatology and new creation: Early christian perspectives on god’s action in Jesus. University of St. Andrews. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf2SJb55iJ0
    Wright, N. (2019). History and eschatology: Jesus and the promise of natural theology. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
    Yong, A. (2007). Theology and Down syndrome: Reimaging disability in late modernity. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
    Young, I. M. (1990). On female body experience: “throwing like a girl.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Young, L. M., & Powell, B. (1985). The effects of obesity on the clinical judgments of mental health professionals. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 26(3), 234246.
    Young, S. N. (2008). The neurobiology of human social behavior: An important but neglected topic. Journal of Psychiatric Neuroscience, 33(5), 391392.

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.