Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T03:57:42.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Forgetting and Inhibition as Mechanisms for Overcoming Mental Fixation in Creative Problem Solving

from II - Fixation and Insight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2024

Carola Salvi
Affiliation:
John Cabot University, Rome
Jennifer Wiley
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Steven M. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Research on creative problem solving has shown that the generation of new ideas and solutions can be impeded by existing ideas and solutions. This phenomenon, known as mental fixation, has been observed in many problem-solving contexts, including the remote associates test (RAT). In the RAT, participants are presented with three cue words and are asked to come up with a fourth word related to each of the cue words. The task can be made more difficult by exposing participants to unhelpful associates that cause mental fixation before they attempt to generate the fourth word. The current chapter reviews research on the mechanisms by which people overcome the effects of mental fixation, focusing on research using the RAT, and on the potential roles of forgetting and inhibition. The results suggest that, at least under certain conditions, the ability to forget, inhibit retrieval, or stop a response can help people overcome mental fixation and thus lead to the experience of creative insight.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiello, D. A., Jarosz, A. F., Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Firing the executive: When an analytic approach to problem solving helps and hurts. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4, Article 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansburg, P. I. (2000). Individual differences in problem solving via insight. Current Psychology, 19, 143146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansburg, P. L., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 11411152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity‐related differences in associative hierarchies. Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 273289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, L., Palmeri, T. J., Logan, G. D., & Schall, J. D. (2007). Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychological Review, 114, 376397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(4), 634639. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burch, G. S. J. , Pavelis, C. , Hemsley, D. R. , & Corr, P. J. (2006). Schizotypy and creativity in visual artists. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 177190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). The importance of iteration in creative conceptual combination. Cognition, 145, 104115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chein, J. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Working memory and insight in verbal problems: Analysis of compound remote associates. Memory & Cognition, 42, 6783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., et al. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 8189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuderski, A., & Jastrzębski, J. (2018). Much ado about Aha!: Insight problem solving is strongly related to working memory capacity and reasoning ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 257281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. B., MacGregor, J. N., Gibb, J., & Haar, J. (2009). Categories of insight and their correlates: An exploration of relationships among classic‐type insight problems, rebus puzzles, remote associates and esoteric analogies. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 262280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2018). Both attentional control and the ability to make remote associations aid spontaneous analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 46, 13981412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, F. N., & Brainerd, C. J. (Eds.). (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditta, A. S., & Storm, B. C. (2018). A consideration of the seven sins of memory in the context of creative cognition. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 402417.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L. S. Lees, Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, D. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Aiding the search: Examining individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 62, 2133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, D. M., Robison, M. K., & Brewer, G. A. (2021). The cognitive underpinnings of multiply-constrained problem solving. Journal of Intelligence, 9, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, T., & Wiley, J. (2016). Forgetting the literal: The role of inhibition in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 13241330.Google ScholarPubMed
George, T., Wiley, J., Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2017). Constraining or constructive? The effects of examples on idea novelty. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53, 396403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, C. J. (1975). The measurement of creativity by the Stroop color and word test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 502506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez-Ariza, C. J., Del Prete, F., Prieto del Val, L., et al. (2017). Memory inhibition as a critical factor preventing creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 986996.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, M. J., & Williams, L. M. (1999). Schizotypy and creativity as effects of reduced cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 263276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groborz, M., & Nęcka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 183197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1987). Creativity research: Past, present and future. In Isaksen, S. G. (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 3365). Bearly Ltd.Google Scholar
Gupta, N., Jang, Y., Mednick, S. C., & Huber, D. E. (2012). The road not taken: Creative solutions require avoidance of high-frequency responses. Psychological Science, 23, 288294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarosz, A. F., Colflesh, G. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 487493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2009). Partly versus completely out of your mind: Effects of incubation and distraction on resolving fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(2), 102118. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01309.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: Incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22, 340348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology & Aging, 9, 491512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C. S., Huggins, A. C., & Therriault, D. J. (2014). A measure of creativity or intelligence? Examining internal and external structure validity evidence of the Remote Associates Test. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 446460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 6064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Memorization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54, i95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 12, 181194. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative problem solving process. Psychological Review, 69, 200232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, R. G., McCarthy, S. W., & Molony, J. M. (2017). The experience of insight follows incubation in the compound remote associates task. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 180187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, J., & Lee, C. H. (2015). The immediate incubation effect on creative problem solving: Using the remote association task. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychological Sciences, 58, 98113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 3477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penaloza, A. A., & Calvillo, D. P. (2012). Incubation provides relief from artificial fixation in problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 338344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radel, R., Davranche, K., Fournier, M., & Dietrich, A. (2015). The role of (dis) inhibition in creativity: Decreased inhibition improves idea generation. Cognition, 134, 110120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricks, T. R., Turley-Ames, K. J., & Wiley, J. (2007). Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 35, 14561462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 9296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachar, R., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Are hyperactive children deficient in attentional capacity? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 493513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C., & Anderson, M. C. (2014). Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition, 133, 358370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J. W., & Melcher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97133). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2017). Interrupted: The roles of distributed effort and incubation in preventing fixation and generating problem solutions. Memory & Cognition, 45, 553565. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0684-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 94120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M. (1995). Fixation, incubation, and insight in memory and creative thinking. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 135146). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (Eds.) Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Beda, Z. (2020). Old problems in new contexts: The context-dependent fixation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 192197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1989). Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27(4), 311314. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03334612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 6187. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., & Linsey, J. (2011). A three-pronged approach for overcoming design fixation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837845. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, B. C. (November, 2020). Forgetting as a mechanism for overcoming fixation in creative problem solving. Spoken presentation at the 61st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.Google Scholar
Storm, B.C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation: Creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 12631265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, B. C., Angello, G. M., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 12871293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023921.Google ScholarPubMed
Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Nestojko, J. F. (2006). Is retrieval success a necessary condition for retrieval-induced forgetting? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 10231027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, B. C., Ditta, A. S., & George, T. (2020). Memory. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed., pp. 116120). Elsevier/Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, B. C., & Koppel, R. H. (2012). Testing the cue dependence of problem-solving-induced forgetting. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, B. C., & Levy, B. J. (2012). A progress report on the inhibitory account of retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 40, 827843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, B. C., & Patel, T. M. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 15941609. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000006Google ScholarPubMed
Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2004). The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. Acta Psychologica, 116, 2137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. A. (2008). STOP‐IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 479483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2007). Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory & Cognition, 35, 701710. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, H. A., & Shah, P. (2006). Uninhibited imaginations: Creativity in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 11211131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as a mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, C. L., Huang, S. Y., Chen, P. Z., & Chen, H. C. (2020). A systematic review of creativity-related studies applying the remote associates test from 2000 to 2019. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 573432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zmigrod, S., Zmigrod, L., & Hommel, B. (2019). The relevance of the irrelevant: Attentional distractor-response binding predicts performance in the remote associates task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×