Alford, H. and Naughton, M., ‘Beyond the shareholder model of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Annan, K., ‘Two concepts of sovereignty’, The Economist (September 18th, 1999)

Argandona, A., ‘The stakeholder theory and the common good’, Journal of Business Ethics 17 (1998), pp. 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armour, J., Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S., ‘Shareholder primacy and the trajectory of UK corporate governance’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (2003), pp. 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axworthy, C., ‘Corporation law as if some people mattered’, University of Toronto Law Journal 36 (1981), pp. 392–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bainbridge, S., ‘Corporate decision-making and the moral rights of employees’, Villanova Law Review 43 (1998) pp. 780–828.Google Scholar

Barca, F. and Brecht, M. (eds.), The control of corporate Europe, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

Bellace, J., ‘The role of the law in supporting employee representation systems’, Comparative Labor Law Journal 15 (1994), pp. 441–460.Google Scholar

Bellace, J., ‘The European Works Council Directive: Transnational information and consultation in the European Union’, Comparative Labor Law Journal 18 (1996–1997), pp. 325–361.Google Scholar

Benedict, XVI, Deus caritas est, (2005) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20051225_deus-caritas-est_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Benedict, XVI, Caritas in veritate, (2009) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Bercusson, B., European Labour Law, (London: Butterworths, 1996).Google Scholar

Bercusson, B., ‘The European social model comes to Britain’, Industrial Law Journal 31 (2002), pp. 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, M., Ownership and control. Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century, (Washington DC: The Brookings Institution Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Blair, M., ‘Firm-specific human capital and theories of the firm’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Blair, M. and Stout, L., ‘A team production theory of corporate law’, Virginia Law Review 85 (1999), pp. 247–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blainpain, R., European Labour Law, (11th revised ed.), (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar

Blasi, J., Kruse, D., Sesil, J. and Kroumova, M., ‘An assessment of employee ownership in the United States with implications for the EU, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14 (2003), pp. 893–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Bullock Report, Command Paper (Cmnd.) 6706, HMSO.

Burbidge, P., ‘Creating high performance boardrooms and workplaces – European corporate governance in the twenty first century’, European Law Review 28 (2003), pp. 642–663.Google Scholar

Calo, Z., ‘ “True economic liberalism” and the development of American Catholic Social Thought, 1920–1940’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 285–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvez, J.-Y. and Perrin, J., The Church and social justice. The social teaching of the Popes from Leo XIII to Pius XII (1878–1958), (Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1961).Google Scholar

Calvez, J.-Y. and Naughton, M., ‘Catholic Social Teaching and the purpose of a business organisation: A developing tradition’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Canavan, F., , S. J., ‘The popes and the economy’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 11 (1997), pp. 429–444.Google Scholar

Carley, M. and Hall, M., ‘The implementation of the European Works Council Directive’, Industrial Law Journal 29 (2000), pp. 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carozza, P., ‘Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law’, American Journal of International Law 97 (2003), pp. 38–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carozza, P., Catechism of the Catholic Church, (available at www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/ccc_toc.htm, last accessed 13th July 2009).

Carozza, P., The Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, The common good and the Catholic Church's social teaching, (1996), (available at www.catholic-ew.org.uk/ccb/catholic_church/publications, last accessed on 25th July 2009).

Charles, R., , S.J., Christian social witness and teaching. The Catholic tradition from Genesis to centessimus annus, (two volumes), (Leominster: Gracewing, 1998).Google Scholar

Charles, R., , S.J., An introduction to Catholic Social Teaching, (Oxford: Family Publications, 1999).Google Scholar

Cessario, R., , O.P., Introduction to moral theology, (Washington DC: The Catholic University Press of America, 2001).Google Scholar

Charny, D., ‘Workers and corporate governance: The role of political culture’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Charny, D., ‘Regulatory competition and the global co-ordination of labor standards’, Journal of International Economic Law 3 (2000), pp. 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chmielewski, P., ‘Workers’ participation in the United States; Catholic Social Teaching and democratic theory', Review of Social Economy LV (1997), pp. 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, H., Employment Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

The Constitution of the John Lewis Partnership (June 2008), (available at www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/Display.aspx?MasterId=9d2aa2cb-e971–4782-b6c1–028cc8374ae4&NavigationId=586, last accessed on 18th July 2009).

Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).

Cooter, R., ‘The best right values: value foundations of the economic analysis of law’, Notre Dame Law Review, p. 817.

Cooter, R. and Ulen, T., Law and economics, (4th edn), (Boston: Pearson/Addison Wesley, 2004).Google Scholar

Copleston, F., Medieval philosophy, (New York: Harper Brothers, 1961).Google Scholar

Davies, P., ‘The Bullock Report and employee participation in corporate planning in the UK’, Journal of Comparative Corporate Law and Securities Regulation 1 (1978), pp. 245–272.Google Scholar

Davies, P. ‘Employee representation and corporate law reform: A comment from the United Kingdom’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 22 (2000–2001), pp. 135–147.Google Scholar

Davies, P.Introduction to Company Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Davies, P. ‘Employee involvement in the European Company’, in Rickford, J. (ed.). The European Company. Developing a Community Law of Corporations, (Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia, 2003).Google Scholar

Davies, P.Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law, (8th ed.), (London: Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell, 2008).Google Scholar

Davies, P. and Lord Wedderburn of Charlton, ‘The land of industrial democracy’, 6 (1977), pp. 197–211.

,The Davignon Report, ‘European systems of worker involvement’ (with regard to the European Company Statute and the other pending proposals), (1997).

Deakin, S., The coming transformation of shareholder value', Corporate Governance: An International Review 41 (2003), pp. 11–18.Google Scholar

Deakin, S., ‘“Enterprise-risk”: The juridical nature of the firm revisited’, Industrial Law Journal 32 (2003), pp. 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deakin, S., Hobbs, R., Konzelmann, S. and Wilkinson, F., ‘Partnership, ownership and control. The impact of corporate governance on employment relations, Employee Relations 24 (2002), pp. 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deakin, S., Hobbs, R., Nash, D. and Slinger, G., Implied contracts, takeovers and corporate governance: In the shadow of the City Code, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper 254.

Deakin, S. and Morris, G., Labour Law, (4th edn), (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry, Company Law reform, (2005), Cm. 6456.

Dinh, V., ‘Codetermination and corporate governance in a multinational business enterprise’, Journal of Corporation Law 24 (1999), pp. 975–999.Google Scholar

Donald, D., ‘Shareholder voice and its opponents’ Journal of Corporate Law Studies 5 (2005), pp. 305–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donaldson, L., ‘The ethereal hand: Organisational economics and management theory’, The Academy of Management Review 15 (1990), pp. 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dow, G., Governing the firm: Workers' control in theory and practice, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dow, G. and Putterman, L., ‘Why capital (usually) hires labour: An assessment of proposed explanations’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Du Plessis, J. and Sandrock, O., ‘The rise and fall of supervisory codetermination in Germany’, International Company and Commercial Law Review 16 (2005), pp. 67–79.Google Scholar

Dundon, T., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M. and Ackers, P., ‘The meanings of employee voice’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 15 (2004), pp. 1149–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drucker, P., Managing in turbulent times, (London: William Heinemann Ltd, 1980).Google Scholar

Drury, R., ‘Migrating companies’, European Law Review 24 (1999), pp. 354–372.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., ‘The corporate contract’, Columbia Law Review 89 (1989), pp. 1416–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easterbrook, F. and Fischel, D., The economic structure of corporate law, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Edwards, T., ‘Corporate governance, industrial relations and trends in company-level restructuring in Europe: Convergence towards the Anglo-American model?’, Industrial Relations Journal 35 (2004), pp. 518–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnis, J., Aquinas. Moral, political and legal theory, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Finnis, J., Natural law and natural rights, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Fitzgibbon, S., ‘ “True human community”: Catholic Social Thought, Aristotelean ethics, and the moral order of the business company’, Saint Louis University Law Journal 45 (2001), pp. 1243–1279.Google Scholar

Fort, T., Ethics and governance, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Fort, T., ‘Business as a mediating institution’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Rossi, S., ‘Spending less time with the family: The decline of family ownership in the United Kingdom’, in Morck, R. (ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Frick, B. and Lehmann, E., ‘Corporate governance in Germany: Ownership, codetermination and firm performance in a stakeholder economy’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Friedman, M., ‘The social responsibility of business is to make a profit’, The New York Times Magazine, 13th September, 1970.

Gates, J., ‘Reengineering ownership for the common good’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

George, R., ‘A defense of the new natural law theory’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 41 (1996), pp. 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghilarducci, T., Hawley, J. and Williams, A., ‘Labour's paradoxical interests and the evolution of corporate governance’, Journal of Law and Society 24 (1997), pp. 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghoshal, S. and Moran, P., ‘Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory’, The Academy of Management Review 21 (1996), pp. 13–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goergen, M. and Renneboog, L., ‘Strong managers and passive institutional investors in the UK’, in Barca, F. and Brecht, M. (eds.), The control of corporate Europe, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Gomez, J., ‘All you who labour: Towards a spirituality of work for the 21st century’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, pp. 791–814.

Goodijk, R., ‘Corporate governance and workers’ participation', Corporate Governance 8 (2000), pp. 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, J., ‘Employee stock ownership in economic transitions: The case of United and the airline industry’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A., ‘Finance, corporate governance and the management of labour’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (2003), p. 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A., ‘Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Gospel, H., Lockwood, G. and Willman, P., ‘A British dilemma: Disclosure of information for collective bargaining and joint consultation’, Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 22 (2000–2001), pp. 327–349.Google Scholar

Green, S., Serving God? Serving Mammon?, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996).Google Scholar

Greenfield, K., ‘The place of workers in corporate law’ Boston College Law Review 39 (1998), p. 283.Google Scholar

Gregg, S., Challenging the modern world. Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and the development of Catholic Social Teaching, (Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 1999).Google Scholar

Gregg, S., ‘Investing in morality’, Villanova Journal of Law and Investment Management 4 (2002), pp. 57–66.Google Scholar

Grisez, G., The way of the Lord Jesus. Christian moral principles, (Quincy, Illinois: Franciscan Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Grisez, G., The way of the Lord Jesus. Living a Christian life, (Quincy, Illinois: Franciscan Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Grisez, G., Boyle, J. and Finnis, J., ‘Practical principles, moral truth and ultimate ends’, The American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1987), pp. 99–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gronbacher, G. and Sirico, R., ‘Towards a personalist work ethic’, in Machan, T. (ed.), Morality and work, (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Guest, D. and Peccei, R., ‘Partnership at work: Mutuality and the balance of advantage’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 39 (2001), pp. 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halal, W., ‘Corporate community: A theory of the firm uniting profitability and responsibility’, Strategy and Leadership, February 28th, 2000, pp. 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, H., ‘When does worker ownership work? ESOPs, law firms, codetermination and economic democracy’, The Yale Law Journal 99 (1989–1990), pp. 1749–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, H., ‘Worker participation and corporate governance’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘The end of history for corporate law’, Georgetown Law Journal 89 (2001), pp. 439–468.Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘What is corporate law?’ in The anatomy of corporate law. A comparative and functional approach, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Harrington, L., ‘Ethics and public policy analysis: Stakeholders’ interests and regulatory policy', Journal of Business Ethics 15 (1996), pp. 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawley, J. and Williams, A., Fiduciary capitalism. How institutional investors can make corporate America more democratic, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Hervada, J., The principles of the social doctrine of the Church, (available at www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/social.html, last accessed on 25th July 2009).

Hollenbach, D., , S.J., The common good and Christian ethics, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollenbach, D., , S.J., ‘“Economic justice for all” twenty years later’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought, 5 (2008), pp. 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honeyball, S., Honeyball & Bower's textbook on Employment Law, (10th edn), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Hopt, K., ‘New ways in corporate governance: European experiments with labor representation on corporate boards’, Michigan Law Review 82 (1983–1984), pp. 1338–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, R. and Trebilcock, M., ‘Protecting the employment bargain’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 751–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Illanes, J.L., The sanctification of work, (New York: Scepter Publishers, 2003).Google Scholar

Shareholders, Institutional' Committee, , The responsibilities of institutional shareholders and agents – a statement of principles (updated 2007), (available at institutionalshareholderscommittee.org.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/ISCStatementofPrinciplesJun07.pdf, last accessed on 18th July 2009).

Jacoby, S., The embedded corporation, (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Jacoby, S., ‘Corporate governance and employees in the United States’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Jackson, G., ‘Towards a comparative perspective on corporate governance and labour management: Enterprise coalitions and national trajectories’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Jackson, G., Hopner, M. and Kurdelbusch, A., ‘Corporate governance and employees in Germany: Changing linkages, complementarities and tensions’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Jensen, M. and Meckling, W., ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976), pp. 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, XXII Mater et magistra (1961) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_15051961_mater_en.html, last accessed on 20th July 2009).

John, XXIII Pacem in terris, (1963) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_xxiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_j-xxiii_enc_11041963_pacem_en.html, last accessed on 31st July 2009).

Paul, John II, Redemptor hominis (1979), (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_04031979_redemptor-hominis_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Paul, John II, Laborem exercens, (1981) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091981_laborem-exercens_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Paul, John II Sollicitudo rei socialis, (1987) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis_en.html, last accessed on 11th July.

Paul, John II Centesimus annus, (1991) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus_en.html, last accessed on 11th July 2009).

Paul, John II Veritatis splendor, (1993) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009)

Paul, John II Evangelium vitae, (1995) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Paul, John II Fides et ratio, (1998) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_15101998_fides-et-ratio_en.html, last accessed on 31st July 2009).

Johnston, A., ‘EC freedom of establishment, employee participation in corporate governance and the limits of regulatory competition’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 6 (2006), pp. 71–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, J. and Silberston, A., ‘Corporate governance’, in MacMillan Patfield, F. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: 2 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar

Keller, B., ‘The European Company statute: Employee involvement and beyond’, Industrial Law Journal 33 (2002), pp. 424–445.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R., ‘The virtue of solidarity and the purpose of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kennedy, R., ‘Business and the common good in the Catholic social tradition’, Villanova Journal of Law and Investment Management 4 (2002), pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

Kershaw, D., ‘No end in sight for the history of corporate law: The case of employee participation in corporate governance’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 34 (2002), pp. 34–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klare, K., ‘Workplace democracy and market reconstruction: An agenda for legal reform’, Catholic University Law Review, pp. 1–68.

Kohler, T., ‘Lessons from the Social Charter: State, corporation and the principle of subsidiarity’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koslowski, P., ‘The shareholder value principle and the purpose of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kulik, B., ‘Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution’, Journal of Business Ethics 59 (2005), pp. 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Learmount, S., Corporate governance – what can be learned from Japan?, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRef

Lee, P., ‘Institutional shareholder activism – part 2’, in Smerdon, R., A practical guide to corporate governance, (3rd edn), (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007).Google Scholar

Leo, XIII Rerum novarum, (1891) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html, last accessed on 11th July 2009).

Lorber, P., ‘Reviewing the European Works Council Directive: European Progress and United Kingdom Perspective’, Industrial Law Journal 33 (2004), pp. 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lower, M., ‘Subsidiarity and the corporation’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 2 (2005), pp. 431–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lower, M., ‘John Paul II and employee participation in corporate governance’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 21 (2007), pp. 111–158.Google Scholar

Lower, M. ‘Christian anthropology and the theory of the firm’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowisch, M., ‘Job safeguarding as an object of the rights of information, consultation, and co-determintation in European and German law’, Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 26 (2004–2005), pp. 371–379.Google Scholar

Lutz, D., ‘Christian social thought and corporate governance’, in Kennedy, R. (ed.), Religion and public life, (Lanham, Md: University Press of America, 2001), pp. 121–140.Google Scholar

Lynch Fannon, I., Working within two kinds of capitalism. Corporate governance and employee stakeholding. US and EC perspectives, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar

Machan, T., Morality and work. Philosophic reflections on a free society, (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Mallin, C., Corporate governance, (2nd edn), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Manne, H., ‘Mergers and the market for corporate control’, The Journal of Political Economy 73 (1965), pp. 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maritain, J., ‘The people and the state’, reprinted in Logos 11 (2008).

Maxwell, J., ‘Should Christians press for revision of Company law?’, University of Detroit Law Journal 40 (1962), pp. 1–165.Google Scholar

May, W., An introduction to moral theology, (2nd edn), Huntington, Ind: Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, 2003).Google Scholar

McCall, J., ‘Employee participation in corporate governance: A defense of strong participation rights’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (2001), pp. 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCann, D., ‘Business corporations and the principle of subsidiarity’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Mele, D., Cristianos en la sociedad. Introduccion a la doctrina social de la Iglesia, (3rd edn), (Madrid: Ediciones Rialp, S.A., 2000).Google Scholar

Mele, D., ‘Not only stakeholder interests. The firm oriented towards the common good’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame: Indiana, University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Michie, J. and Oughton, C., ‘Employee participation and ownership rights’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies 2 (2002), pp. 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misner, P., Social Catholicism in Europe. From the onset of industrialization to the First World War, (New York: Dartford, Longman and Todd, 1991).Google Scholar

Messner, J., Social ethics. Natural law in the western world, (St Louis and London: B. Herder Book Co., 1965).Google Scholar

Monks, R. and Nell, M., Corporate governance, (Malden, Ma: Blackwell Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Morck, R. (ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005).CrossRef

Murphy, J. and Pyke, D., ‘Humane work and the challenges of job design’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Myners Report on corporate governance, HM Treasury, London, (2001).

Naughton, M., ‘The corporation as a community of work: Understanding the firm within the Catholic social tradition’, Ave Maria Law Review 4 (2006), pp. 33–75.Google Scholar

Newman, J., Co-responsibility in industry: Social justice in labour management relations, (Cork: Cork University Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Njoya, W., ‘Employee ownership and efficiency: An evolutionary perspective’, Industrial Law Journal 33 (2004), pp. 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Njoya, W., Property in work. The employment relationship in the Anglo-American firm, (Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar

Novak, M., The corporation: A theological inquiry, (Washington: The American Enterprise Institute Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Novak, M., Toward a theology of the corporation, (Washington: The AEI Press, 1990).Google Scholar

O' Connor, J., ‘Making a case for the common good in a global economy. The United Nations Human Development Reports (1990–2001)’, Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2002), pp. 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O' Connor, M., ‘The human capital era: Re-conceptualising corporate law to facilitate labour management co-operation’ Cornell Law Review 78 (1993), pp. 901–965.Google Scholar

O' Connor, M., ‘Global capitalism and the evolution of American corporate governance’, in MacMillan Patfield, F. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: 2 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997).Google Scholar

O' Connor, M., ‘Employees and corporate governance: United States: Labour's role in the American corporate governance structure’, Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal 22 (2000), pp. 97–133.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, R., The case for workers' co-ops, (Basingstoke: MacMillan Press Ltd, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogletree, T., ‘Corporate capitalism and the common good. A framework for addressing the challenges of a global economy.’ Journal of Religious Ethics, 30 (2002), pp. 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parkinson, J., Corporate power and responsibility. Issues in the theory of Company Law, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Parkinson, J., ‘Models of the company and the employment relationship’, British Journal of Industrial Relations 41 (2003), pp. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, VIPopulorum progressio (1967) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html, last accessed 13th July 2009).

Paul, VIOctogesima adveniens (1971) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/apost_letters/documents/hf_p-vi_apl_19710514_octogesima-adveniens_en.html, last accessed on 20th July 2009).

Pecorella, R., ‘Property rights, the common good and the state: The Catholic view of market economies’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 235–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pendleton, A., Employee ownership, participation and governance – a study of ESOPs in the UK, (London and New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Pendleton, A. and Gospel, H., ‘Markets and relationships: Finance, governance and labour in the United Kingdom’, in Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. (eds.), Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Pesch, H., , S.J., Ethics and the national economy, (translated by Ederer, Dr Rupert), (Norfolk, VA: IHS Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Pinckaers, S., The sources of Christian ethics, (translated by Thomas Noble, M.), (Washington DC: The Catholic University Press of America, 1995).Google Scholar

Paul, VIMorality. The Catholic view, (South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Pistor, K., ‘Codetermination: A socio-political model with governance externalities’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Pius, XIQuadragesimo anno, (1931) (available at www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19310515_quadragesimo-anno_en.html, last accessed on 15th July 2009).

Sciences, Pontifical Academy of Social, Work and human fulfillment, (Ave Maria, Fl.: Sapientia Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Peace, Pontifical Council for Justice and, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, trans. 2004).Google Scholar

Peace, Pontifical Council for Justice and, The report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, (‘the Cadbury Report’) (1992).

Reberioux, A., ‘European style of corporate governance at the crossroads: The role of worker involvement’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2002), pp. 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, M. and Appeldoorn, B., ‘Capital unbound? The transformation of European corporate governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1998), pp. 406–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, J., ‘Trust and control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: the individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability’, Human Relations 54 (2001), pp. 1547–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, VI ‘The manufacture of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Organisation 10 (2003), pp. 249–265.Google Scholar

Rock, E. and Wachter, M., ‘Tailored claims and governance: the fit between employees and shareholders’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Roe, M., ‘Codetermination and German securities markets’, in Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Paul, VIPolitical determinants of corporate governance, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Roe, M. and Blair, M. (eds.), Employees and corporate governance, (Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1999).

Sadowski, D., Junkes, J. and Lindenthal, S., ‘Employees and corporate governance: Germany: The German model of corporate and labor governance’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 22 (2000), pp. 33–66.Google Scholar

Sargent, M., ‘Utility, the good and civic happiness: a Catholic critique of law and economics’, Journal of Catholic Legal Studies 44 (2005), p. 36.Google Scholar

Schall, J., , S.J., ‘Catholicism, business and priorities’, in Williams, O. and Houck, J. (eds.), The Judaeo-Christian vision and the modern corporation, (Notre Dame, Ind.:University of Notre Dame Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Schiek, D., ‘Autonomous collective agreements as a regulatory device in European Labour Law: How to read article 139 EC’, Industrial Law Journal 34 (2005), pp. 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilling, F., ‘Corporate governance in Germany: The move to shareholder value’, Corporate Governance 9 (2001), pp. 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schultze, G., S.J., ‘Worker-ownership and Catholic Social Thought’, Social Policy Winter 2001/2002, pp. 12–16.

Schultze, G., , S.J., ‘Work, worship, Laborem exercens and the United States today’, Logos 5 (2002), pp. 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schumacher, C., God is work: Discovering the divine pattern for work in the new millenium, (Oxford: Lion UK, 1999).Google Scholar

Council, Second Vatican, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the modern world, Gaudium et Spes, (1965) (available at www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Shareholder ownership: A report on ownership of shares as at December 31, 2004, Office of National Statistics.

Shleifer, A. and Summers, L., Breaches of trust in hostile takeovers, (Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, J., ‘Jobs and justice: rethinking the stakeholder debate’, University of Toronto Law Journal 43 (1993), pp. 473–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smerdon, R., A practical guide to corporate governance, (3rd edn), (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007).Google Scholar

Stabile, S., ‘Workers in the vineyard: Catholic Social Thought and the workplace’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 371–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stapledon, G., Institutional investors and corporate governance, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Sun, J.-M. and Pelkmans, J., ‘Regulatory competition in the single market’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (1995), pp. 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sun, J.-M. and Pelkmans, J., The Takeover Code, (9th edn, 2009), (available at www.thetakeoverpanel.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/code.pdf, last accessed on 20th July 2009).

Tavis, L., ‘Modern contract theory and the purpose of the firm’, in Cortright, S. and Naughton, M. (eds.), Rethinking the purpose of business. Interdisciplinary essays from the Catholic Social Tradition, (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002), pp. 215–236.Google Scholar

Tiebout, C., ‘A pure theory of local expenditures’, The Journal of Political Economy 64 (1956), pp. 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishops, US Conference of Catholic, Economic justice for all, (1986) (available at www.usccb.org/jphd/economiclife/pdf/economic_justice_for_all.pdf, last accessed on 13th July 2009).

Vagts, D., ‘Reforming the “modern” corporation: Perspectives from the German’, Harvard Law Review 80 (1966–67), pp. 23–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vann, G., O.P., Morals and man, (London: Fontana Books, 1960).Google Scholar

Vischer, R., ‘Subsidiarity as a principle of governance: Beyond devolution’, Indiana Law Review 35 (2001–2002), pp. 103–142.Google Scholar

Paul, VI ‘The morally distinct corporation: reclaiming the relational dimension of conscience’, Journal of Catholic Social Thought 5 (2008), pp. 323–369.Google Scholar

Waddington, J., ‘What do representatives think of the practices of European Works Councils? Views from six countries’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 9 (2003), pp. 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlton, Lord Wedderburn of,‘Companies and employees: Common law or social dimension’, Law Quarterly Review 109 (1993), pp. 220–262.Google Scholar

Paul, VIEmployees, partnership and company law', Industrial Law Journal 31 (2002), pp. 99–111.Google Scholar

Weigel, G., ‘The Church's Social Doctrine in the twenty-first century’, Logos 6 (2003), pp. 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werlauff, E., ‘The development of Community company law’, European Law Review 17 (1992), pp. 207–231.Google Scholar

Paul, VI ‘Using a foreign company for domestic activities’, European Business Law Review 10 (2000), pp. 306–313.Google Scholar

Wheeler, S., Corporations and the third way, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar

Wilber, C., ‘Economics and ethics: The challenge of the bishops’ pastoral letter on the economy', Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 2 (1985–1987), pp. 107–124.Google Scholar

Williamson, O., ‘Corporate governance’, The Yale Law Journal 93 (1984), pp. 1197–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wojtyla, K., Person and community. Selected essays, (Sandok, T., , O.S.M. trans.), (New Jersey: Peter Lang, 1993).Google Scholar

Wouters, J., ‘European company law: Quo Vadis?’, Common Market Law Review 37 (2000), pp. 257–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zumbansen, P., ‘The parallel worlds of corporate governance and labor law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 13 (2006), pp. 261–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar