PUTNAM: THE ATTACK ON MATERIALISM AND PHYSICALISM

In the debate engaging the contemporary philosophy of mind the functionalist movement has proved to be an extremely lively, complex, and epistemologically formidable contender. Functionalism has addressed themes and issues of crucial importance to the mindbody relationship: the nature of mental states, the structure of psychological explanation, the possible autonomy of psychology as a science, and the problems of reduction and nomology in psychological analysis. Its investigation covers epistemological and (meta)psychological terrain and is carried out on different levels at once. We shall limit ourselves, however, to examining certain theoretical points of particular pertinence to our present concerns and to consider two philosophers who have emerged from a variety of currents as the foremost champions of functionalism: Hilary Putnam and Jerry Fodor.

The most striking quality of the output of Putnam and Fodor is the theoretical breadth. Unlike many mbp specialists, neither Fodor nor much less Putnam (whose foreground role in contemporary philosophy scarcely needs underscoring) confines himself to a ‘technical’ approach to the question of the relationship between mind and body. On the contrary, both carry out their investigations within a much broader context and assume clear positions on the far-reaching psychoanthropological and epistemological implications of the problem. Not surprisingly, then, Putnam and Fodor take determined stands on issues of general concern to philosophy such as materialism, physicalism, and reductionism.