Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:03:37.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Understanding Gender and Inclusion in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2021

Banu Ozkazanc-Pan  and
Susan Clark Muntean
Banu Ozkazanc-Pan
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Susan Clark Muntean
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Asheville
Get access

Summary

The third chapter focuses explicitly on the relevance of gender for entrepreneurial ecosystems. The chapter first discusses the differences between sex, gender, and gender relations to lay the foundation for a dynamic understanding of actors and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Guided by feminist perspectives in entrepreneurship and sociology the chapter provides theoretical insights, derived from the various ways in which gender is studied, on how gender can be conceptualized and how inclusion is a multifaceted concept and practice. The chapter then offers a guiding definition of gender inclusion in relation to entrepreneurial ecosystems and moves on to provide insights about how to study it in relation to individuals, organizations, and sociocultural norms at the same time. In doing so, this chapter provides a multifactor and multilevel gender framework for understanding economic inclusion in relation to entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Keywords

genderfeminismsexrelationaldiscourseinequalityidentity
Type
Chapter
Information
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
A Gender Perspective
 , pp. 62 - 97
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, J., (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2): 139–158.Google Scholar
Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In Mills, A. J. & Tancred, P. (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 248–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Acker, J. (2000). Gendered contradictions in organizational equity projects. Organization, 7(4): 625–632.Google Scholar
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4): 441–464.Google Scholar
Ahl, H. (2004). The scientific reproduction of gender inequality: A discourse analysis of research texts on women’s entrepreneurship. Malmo, Sweden: Liber.Google Scholar
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism, and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5): 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, G. (1970). “The market for lemons: Quality ucertainty and the market mechanism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balachandra, L., Briggs, T., Eddleston, K., & Brush, C. (2019). Don’t pitch like a girl!: How gender stereotypes influence investor decisions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1): 116–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (1998a). Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies, 19(5): 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benschop, Y., & Doorewaard, H. (1998b). Six of one and half a dozen of the other: The gender subtext of Taylorism and team‐based work. Gender, Work & Organization, 5(1): 5–18.Google Scholar
Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1999). A shifting standards perspective on the complexity of gender stereotypes and gender stereotyping. In Swann, W. B. Jr., Langlois, J. H., & Gilbert, L. A. (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 75–106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/10277-004Google Scholar
Bird, B., & Brush, C. (2002). A gendered perspective on organizational creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3): 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6): 1142.Google Scholar
Bordieu, P. (1980). L’identité et la représentation. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 35: 63–70.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W., & Murray, F. E. (2014). Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12): 4427–4431.Google Scholar
Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work & Organization, 11(4): 406–429.Google Scholar
Brush, C. G. (1992). Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(4): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, C. G. (1997). Women-owned businesses: Obstacles and opportunities. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Brush, C. G., & Chaganti, R. (1999). Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3): 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calás, M. B., & Smircich, L. (2006). From the “Woman’s point of view” ten years later: Towards a feminist organization studies (pp. 284–346). The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2007). Knowing Lisa? Feminist analyses of gender and entrepreneurship. In Billamoria, D. and Piderit, S. K. (Eds.), Handbook on women in business and management (pp. 78–105). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: Reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3): 552–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark Muntean, S. (2009). A political theory of the firm: Why ownership matters. (Doctoral dissertation in political science), defended at the University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Clark Muntean, S., & Ozkazanc-Pan, B. (2016). Feminist perspectives on social entrepreneurship: Critique and new directions. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 8(3): 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69(1): 93–113.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T. & Trautner, H. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., Manolova, T. S., & Greene, P. G. (2010). Start‐up motivations and growth intentions of minority nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2): 174–196.Google Scholar
Farrell, M., & Brown, E. (2019). The money men who enabled Adam Neumann. The Wall Street Journal, December 14–15, 2019, B1.Google Scholar
Farrell, M., Hoffman, L., Brown, E., & Benoit, D. (2019). The fall of WeWork: How a startup darling came unglued. The Wall Street Journal, October 24, 2019. Available online at www.wsj.com/articles/the-fall-of-wework-how-a-startup-darling-came-unglued-11571946003 (accessed June 19, 2020).Google Scholar
Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 21–42.Google Scholar
Foss, L., Henry, C., Ahl, H., & Mikalsen, G. H. (2019). Women’s entrepreneurship policy research: A 30-year review of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 53(2): 409–429.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. (1994). The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organizational lives. Human Relations, 47(6): 591–610.Google Scholar
Grey, C., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2005). Critical management studies: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hechavarría, D. M., & Ingram, A. E. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem conditions and gendered national-level entrepreneurial activity: A 14-year panel study of GEM. Small Business Economics, 53(2): 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howson, R., & Kerr, G. (2019). The Innovation Ecosystem: Interrogating (trans)national gender (un)sustainability in the new business centre. In Hearn, J., Vasquez del Aguila, E., & Hughson, M. (Eds.), Unsustainable Institutions of Men: Transnational Dispersed Centres, Gender, Power, Contradictions (pp. 41–54). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopkins, M. M., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Care and justice orientations in workplace ethical dilemmas of women business owners. Group & Organization Management, 29(4): 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, A. E. (1999). Incorporating feminist theories into sociological theories of entrepreneurship. Women in Management Review, 14(2): 54–62.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. E., & Brush, C. G. (2013). Research on women entrepreneurs: Challenges to (and from) the broader entrepreneurship literature? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1): 663–715.Google Scholar
Light, I. (2010). The religious ethic of the Protestant ethnics. In Dana, L.-P. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and Religion (pp. 168–183). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Light, I., & Dana, L. P. (2013). Boundaries of social capital in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3): 603–624.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., Noorderhaven, N. G., Cannon, J. P., Doney, P. M., & Mullen, M. R. (1999). Some reservations about social capital. Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 8–11.Google Scholar
Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013). Incubation or Induction? Gendered identity work in the context of technology business incubation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4): 791–816.Google Scholar
McAdam, M., Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. M. (2019). Stories from the field: women’s networking as gender capital in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2): 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. May 11, 2019. Did Elizabeth Holmes delude smart men by acting like a man? Psychology Today. Available online at www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sexx-matters/201905/did-elizabeth-holmes-delude-smart-men-acting-man (accessed June 21, 2020).Google Scholar
Miller, G. E. (2004). Frontier masculinity in the oil industry: The experience of women engineers. Gender, Work & Organization, 11(1): 47–73.Google Scholar
Mirchandani, K. (1999). Feminist insight on gendered work: New directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender, Work & Organization, 6(4): 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss Kanter, R. (1977). Women and the structure of organizations: Explorations in theory and behavior. In Moss Kanter, R. & Millman, M. (Eds.), Another voice (pp. 34–74). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Neumeyer, X., Santos, S. C., Caetano, A., & Kalbfleisch, P. (2019). Entrepreneurship ecosystems and women entrepreneurs: A social capital and network approach. Small Business Economics, 53(2): 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolova, M. (1993). Nyakoi demografski spekti na jenskoto predpriemachestvo (Some demographic aspects of women’s entrepreneurship). Problemi Na Truda, 9: 46–61.Google Scholar
Ozkazanc‐Pan, B., & Clark Muntean, S. (2018). Networking towards (in) equality: Women entrepreneurs in technology. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(4): 379–400.Google Scholar
Prokos, A., & Padavic, I. (2002). “There oughtta be a law against bitches”: Masculinity lessons in police academy training. Gender, Work & Organization, 9(4): 439–459.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2017). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and ideology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Poggio, B. (2006). Outline of a theory of gender practices. Gender, Work & Organization, 13(3): 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A Theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4): 510–531.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1986). The collectivist organization. American Historical Review, 91(5): 1053–1075.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1): 99–118.Google Scholar
Small Business Economics (2019). Special issue on women entrepreneurs in ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2): 393–546.Google Scholar
Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16(4): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprague, J. (2016). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers: Bridging differences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship, 1–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580336Google Scholar
Stobbe, L. (2005). Doing machismo: Legitimating speech acts as a selection discourse. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(2): 105–123.Google Scholar
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2): 125–151.Google Scholar
Wheadon, M., & Duval‐Couetil, N. (2019). The gendering of entrepreneurship on reality television. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4): 1676–1697.Google Scholar
Witz, A., & Savage, M. (1991). The gender of organizations. The Sociological Review, 39(1): 3–62.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×