Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-31T14:02:43.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

George Sher
Affiliation:
Rice University, Houston
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. “What Is the Point of Equality?,” Ethics 109 (1999): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, ElizabethHow Should Egalitarians Cope with Market Risks?,” Theoretical Inquiries into Law 9 (2008): 239–70.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Distributive Ethics and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is not Enough,” in Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. Edited by Kaufman, Alexander, pp. 17–43. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Arneson, RichardEgalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor,” Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (1997): 327–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, RichardEquality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare,” Philosophical Studies 56 (1989): 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, RichardLuck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism,” Ethics, 110 (2000): 339–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, RichardLuck Egalitarianism: An Interpretation and Defense,” Philosophical Topics 32 (2004): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard “What, if Anything, Renders All Humans Morally Equal?,” in Singer and His Critics. Edited by Jamieson, Dale, pp. 103–28. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward. The Unheavenly City. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1968.Google Scholar
Barry, Nicholas. “Defending Luck Egalitarianism,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2006): 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brighouse, Harry, and Swift, Adam. “Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods,” Ethics 116 (2006): 471–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, Joseph. Equality, Moral Incentives, and the Market: An Essay in Utopian Politico-Economic Theory. University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian. “Basic Equality and the Site of Egalitarian Justice,” Economics and Philosophy 29 (2013): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, IanRespect and the Basis of Equality,” Ethics 121 (2011): 538–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, Paula. “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough,” Ethics 117 (2007): 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald. “Luck and Equality: A Reply to Hurley,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2006): 439–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, GeraldOn the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics 99 (1989): 906–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, GeraldRescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. “Equality, Luck and Hierarchy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003): 190–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldIn Defense of Equality,” Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1983): 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldJustice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldA Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldSovereign Virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldSovereign Virtue Revisited,” Ethics 113 (2002): 106–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldTaking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldWhat Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981): 185–246.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldWhat Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1981): 283–345.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. Doing and Deserving. Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, Marc. “Egalitarian Opportunities,” Law and Philosophy 20 (2001): 499–530.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, MarcEqual Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?,” Economics and Philosophy 11 (2005): 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,” Journal of Philosophy 66 (1969): 829–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, HarryThe Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, Herbert. The War against the Poor: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy. New York: Basic Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. Democratic Education. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Harrington, Michael. The Other America. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Heyd, David, and Miller, G. Franklin. “Life Plans: Do They Give Meaning to Our Lives?,” The Monist 93 (2010): 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, Richard. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, Susan. Justice, Luck, and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovik, Paul, and Tversky, Amos, eds. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRef
Kauppinen, Anntui. “Meaningfulness and Time,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2012): 239–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Simon. “Welfare as Success,” Nous 43 (2009): 656–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Carl. Luck Egalitarianism. University of Edinburgh Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Knight, CarlThe Metaphysical Case for Luck Egalitarianism,” Social Theory and Practice 32 (2006): 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, ChristineSelf-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, ChristineThe Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Charles. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, CharlesThe Idea of a Life Plan,” Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1999): 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. “Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility,” Ethics 111 (2001): 548–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper “Justice and Bad Luck,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009), online, n.p.
Lloyd Thomas, D. A. “Equality within the Limits of Reason Alone,” Mind 88 (1979): 538–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Daniel. “Luck Egalitarianism and Political Solidarity,” Theoretical Inquiries into Law 9 (2008): 271–308.Google Scholar
McKerlie, Dennis. “Equality and Time,” Ethics 99 (1989): 475–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, Jeff. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. Market, State, and Community: Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism. Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. Equality and Partiality. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Nagel, ThomasThe View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, MarthaWomen and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsaretti, Serena, ed. Justice and Desert. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Olsaretti, Serena, Liberty, Desert, and the Market. Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef
Otsuka, Michael. “Luck, Insurance, and Equality,” Ethics 113 (2002): 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. “Equality or Priority?,” in The Idea of Equality. Edited by Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew, pp. 81–125. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar
Pettit, Phillip. “Freedom and Probability: A Comment on Goodin and Jackson,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2008): 206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raibly, Jason R. “Welfare over Time and the Case for Holism,” Philosophical Papers 41 (2012): 239–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakowski, Eric. Equal Justice. Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, JohnKantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980): 515–72.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Riley, Jonathan. “Justice under Capitalism,” in Markets and Justice: Nomos XXXI. Edited by Chapman, J. W. and Pennock, J. Roland, pp. 122–62. New York University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. “A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993): 146–66.Google Scholar
Roemer, JohnEquality and Responsibility,” The Boston Review, 20 (1995): 3–16.Google Scholar
Roemer, JohnEquality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojchek. Giving Desert Its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandbu, Martin. “On Dworkin's Brute-Luck – Option-Luck Distinction and the Consistency of Brute-Luck Egalitarianism,” Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 3 (2004): 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. Equality and Tradition. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Scheffler, SamuelWhat Is Egalitarianism?,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003): 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, Shlomi. “In Solidarity with the Imprudent: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism,” Social Theory and Practice 33 (2007): 177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya “Equality of What?,” in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Edited by McMurrin, Sterling, pp. 195–220. Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Sen, AmartyaInequality Reexamined. Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sher, George. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, GeorgeDesert. Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Sher, GeorgeTalents and Choices,” Nous 46 (2012): 375–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, GeorgeWho Knew? Responsibility without Awareness. Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. New York: Avon Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Singer, PeterPractical Ethics, Third Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilansky, Saul. “Egalitarian Justice and the Importance of the Free Will Problem,” Philosophia 25 (1997): 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sytsma, Justin, and Machery, Edouard. “The Two Sources of Moral Standing,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (2012): 303–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. “A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism,” Journal of Philosophy 105 (2008): 665–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry. “Egalitarianism Defended,” Ethics 110 (2000): 339–49.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. “Brute Luck and Responsibility,” Philosophy, Politics, and Economics 7 (2008): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, PeterBrute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities,” Ethics 112 (2002): 529–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. David. Practical Reflection. Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. DavidThe Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Voight, Kristin. “The Harshness Objection: Is Luck Egalitarianism Too Harsh on the Victims of Option Luck?,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2007): 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Basic Equality.” New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, 107 (2009): online.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “The Idea of Equality,” in Equality: Selected Readings. Edited by Pojman, Louis and Westmoreland, Robert, pp. 91–104. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Williams, BernardMoral Luck. Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, William Julius. The Truly Disadvantaged. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • George Sher, Rice University, Houston
  • Book: Equality for Inegalitarians
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841859.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • George Sher, Rice University, Houston
  • Book: Equality for Inegalitarians
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841859.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • George Sher, Rice University, Houston
  • Book: Equality for Inegalitarians
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841859.011
Available formats
×