Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- List of contributors
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: Henry Sidgwick today
- PART I Common-sense morality, deontology, utilitarianism
- 1 Sidgwick and nineteenth-century British ethical thought
- 2 Sidgwick and the Cambridge moralists
- 3 Sidgwick and Whewellian intuitionism: some enigmas
- 4 Common sense at the foundations
- PART II Egoism, dualism, identity
- PART III Hedonism, good, perfection
- PART IV History, politics, pragmatism
- Index
2 - Sidgwick and the Cambridge moralists
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- List of contributors
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction: Henry Sidgwick today
- PART I Common-sense morality, deontology, utilitarianism
- 1 Sidgwick and nineteenth-century British ethical thought
- 2 Sidgwick and the Cambridge moralists
- 3 Sidgwick and Whewellian intuitionism: some enigmas
- 4 Common sense at the foundations
- PART II Egoism, dualism, identity
- PART III Hedonism, good, perfection
- PART IV History, politics, pragmatism
- Index
Summary
In thinking of the history of moral philosophy, we are rather inclined to forget to how great a degree, especially in more recent times, moral philosophy is embodied in religion. If we do not keep this in mind, but look at the history of moral philosophy only as it is contained in avowedly ethical treatises, the history can never be to us more than a matter of literature; and the point of much the greatest consequence about it, which is, the relation of the ethics of any period to the general thought of that period, is a matter which we shall not be in a condition to speak of.
John GroteSidgwick is usually considered to be a utilitarian, and with good reason. In an autobiographical fragment he tells us that his “first adhesion to a definite Ethical system was to the Utilitarianism of Mill,” and that after a variety of intellectual changes he became “a Utilitarian again, but on an Intuitional basis.” He refers to himself in other works and in letters as a utilitarian, and he was so viewed by his contemporaries. Hence it is understandable that Albee should view The Methods of Ethics as “an independent contribution to the literature of Utilitarianism,” labeling it “the last authoritative utterance of traditional Utilitarianism,” and that almost everyone who discusses the book should agree with this classification of it. Yet Sidgwick did not himself say that the Methods is a defense or a restatement of utilitarianism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Essays on Henry Sidgwick , pp. 93 - 122Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1992
- 3
- Cited by