Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:25:27.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Civil litigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

W. Bradley Wendel
W. Bradley Wendel
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

The different ethical worlds of civil and criminal lawyers

Lawyers do many things other than prosecuting and defending criminal cases. This chapter, and those that follow, considers the lawyer’s ethical duties in these other contexts. Interestingly, when thinking about those ethical issues, lawyers often have in mind the paradigm of the criminal defense lawyer as the model of ethical lawyering. Consider this critique of the rules of professional conduct from an ethical point of view:

It used to be, and around the turn of the century it was, that the rules expressly stated that the lawyer’s obligation to the client in litigation was to represent the client with warm zeal. Now, in the latest incarnation of the rules, the words “warm zeal” are dropped out. Instead, [the current rule of professional conduct] says (in essence) “we really mean warm zeal, but we talk about professionalism and competence and so on because we are afraid that if we say warm zeal, people will think that means you need to be a zealot on behalf of your client, and nobody likes zealots.” So in the name of softening up the rules and softening up the image of the profession, the warm zeals are a threatened species. They are clubbing the warm zeals to death to make coats for rich people.

Can you tell what kind of law this critic practices? The lawyer, Michael Tigar, is a passionate and talented defender of unpopular clients accused of crimes (and of the practice of criminal defense). Clubbing baby zeals is a funny line, but the concern about making coats for rich people shows that Tigar is really thinking about representing powerless individuals facing the dehumanizing machinery of the state, even though he talks more broadly about representing clients in litigation. Warm zeal may be an appropriate gloss on the principle of partisanship in the context of criminal defense, but it is problematic in other contexts of practice, including the representation of disputing parties in civil litigation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Law
An Introduction
 , pp. 173 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tigar, Michael E., “Litigators’ Ethics,” Tennessee Law Review 67: 409–24 (2000), p. 411Google Scholar
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
Aviel, Rebecca, “Why Civil Gideon Won’t Fix Family Law,” Yale Law Journal 122: 2106–24 (2013)Google Scholar
Ziv, Neta, “Lawyers Talking Rights and Clients Breaking Rules: Between Legal Positivism and Distributive Justice in Israeli Poverty Lawyering,” Clinical Law Review 11: 209–39 (2004)Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Rights-Based Moralities,” in Waldron, Jeremy, ed., Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984), p. 183Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books 1983), p. 33Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Two Sides of the Coin,” in Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993), pp. 5–10Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 26: 710–70 (1917)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Edgar O., “Is Rent Control Good Social Policy?,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 67: 921–45 (1991)Google Scholar
Schneck, Paul, “Not So Scary After All: In Defense of Patent Trolls,” Forbes (Feb. 1, 2013)
Maxwell, Ian, “In Defense of Patent Trolls,” IP Strategy (May 29, 2013), available at Google Scholar
Dare, Tim, The Counsel of Rogues? A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role (Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate 2009), p. 61Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, “The Fragmentation of Value,” in Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979), p. 128Google Scholar
Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1930), p. 21Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press 1993), pp. 55–58Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 2011), pp. 155–56Google Scholar
Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W.2d 686 (Minn. 1980)
Fisher, William W., et al., eds., American Legal Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993)
Leiter, Brian, “Legal Realism,” in Patterson, Dennis, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell 1996), p. 261Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2d. edn., 1994), p. 126Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart,” Harvard Law Review 71: 630–72, p. 663CrossRef
Hart, H. L. A., “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629, p. 607CrossRef
Wilkins, David B., “Legal Realism for Lawyers,” Harvard Law Review 104: 468–524 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1988), p. 75Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The Lysistratian Prerogative: A Response to Stephen Pepper,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1986: 637–49, pp. 646–47Google Scholar
Wendel, W. Bradley, Lawyers and Fidelity to Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2010), pp. 73–76Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1.7, 1097a (Ross, W. D. and Urmson, J. O. trans. 1984)
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2d edn., 1984), pp. 14–51Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M., Objectivity and Interpretation, Stanford Law Review 34: 739–63 (1982)CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Civil litigation
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Civil litigation
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Civil litigation
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.012
Available formats
×