Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T23:18:19.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Role of Greek Sanctuaries in Material and Artistic Interactions between Etruria and Anatolia

from Part II - Interpretive Frameworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Elizabeth P. Baughan
Affiliation:
University of Richmond, Virginia
Lisa C. Pieraccini
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

A plethora of archaeological evidence retrieved from regional and panhellenic sanctuaries in Greece suggests that from the eighth century BCE and throughout the Archaic period sanctuaries functioned as seminal nodes of cultural interaction between Etruria and Anatolia. This chapter discusses evidence from Greek sanctuaries that functioned as arenas of actual physical contact and tangible or intangible exchanges between visitors from the Italic peninsula and visitors from Anatolia and proposes a heuristic classification of two major categories of sanctuaries: transactional, in which exchanges of an economic nature would have taken place, and heterotopic, in which some transactional exchanges may have been arranged or taken place but which mainly configured themselves as wondrous places only for very few and exclusive visitors seeking to enhance their prestige by simply being there. Contacts between Italics and Anatolians would have taken place in both transactional and heterotopic sanctuaries, while only the high, exclusive elites would have frequented the heterotopic sanctuaries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Etruria and Anatolia
Material Connections and Artistic Exchange
, pp. 98 - 110
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aruz, J., Graff, S. B., and Rakic, Y. (eds.) 2014. Assyria to Iberia at the Dawn of the Classical Age. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Aubet, M. E. 2006. “On the Organization of the Phoenician Colonial System in Iberia,” in Debating Orientalization. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Change in the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Riva, C. and Vella, N. C., 94109. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Aurigny, H. 2016. “Sicilian and Italic Votive Objects in the Panhellenic Sanctuary at Delphi,” in Materielle Kultur und Identität im Spannungsfeld zwischen Mediterraner Welt und Mitteleuropa. Akten der Internationalen Tagung am Römisch Germanischen Zentralmuseum, Mainz, 22–24 Oktober 2014, ed. Baitinger, H., 161174. Mainz: Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum.Google Scholar
Aurigny, H. 2019. Bronzes du haut-archaïsme à Delphes. Trépieds, chaudrons, et vaisselle de bronze (fin VIIIe-VIIe siècle), Fouilles de Delphes 5: Monuments Figurés. Athens: École Française d’ Athènes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baitinger, H. 2013. “Sizilisch-Unteritalische Funde in Griechischen Heiligtümern. Ein Beitrag zu den Votivsitten in Griechenland in spätgeometrischer und archaischer Zeit,” Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums 2013: 153296.Google Scholar
Brize, P. 1997. “Offrandes de l’époque géometrique et archaïque à l’Héraion de Samos,” in Héra: Images, espaces, cultes. Actes du Colloque International du Centre de Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Lille III et de l’Association P.R.A.C. Lille, 29–30 novembre 1993, ed. Genière, J. de la, 123139. Naples: Centre Jean Bérard.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. 1988. Greek Lyric II. Anacreon, Anacreontea, Choral Lyric from Olympus to Alcman, The Loeb Classical Library 143. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Colonna, G. 1993. “Doni di Etruschi e di altri barbari occidentali nei santuari panellenici,” in I grandi santuari della Grecia e l’Occidente, ed. Mastrocinque, A., 4368. Trento: Università di Trento. Dipartimento di scienze filologiche e storiche.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, B. 2000. “Delphi e l’Italia tirrenica: dalla protostoria alla fine del periodo archaico,” in Delphes cent ans après la grande fouille. Actes du colloque international organisé par l’École Français d’ Athènes, BCH Suppl. 36, 79–86. Athens: École française d’Athènes.Google Scholar
Daston, L. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Demetriou, D. 2012. Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: The Archaic and Classical Multiethnic Emporia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeVries, K., and Rose, C. B. 2012. “The Throne of Midas? Delphi and the Power Politics of Phrygia, Lydia, and Greece,” in The Archaeology of Phrygian Gordion, Royal City of Midas, Gordion Special Studies 7, ed. Rose, C. B., 189200. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar
Donder, H. 2002. “Funde aus Milet XI. Die Metalfunde,” Archäologischer Anzeiger: 18.Google Scholar
Findlen, P. 1994. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Findlen, P. 2002. Merchants and Marvels: Commerce, Science and Art in Early Modern Europe. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fisher, P. 1998. Wonder, the Rainbow and the Aesthetics of Rare Experiences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1986. “Of Other Spaces,” Diacritics 16(1): 2227.Google Scholar
Gehrig, U., and Schneider, G. 2004. Die Greifenprotomen aus dem Heraion von Samos, Samos 9. Bonn: R. Habelt.Google Scholar
Gorman, V. 2001. Miletos, the Ornament of Ionia. A History of the City to 400 B.C.E. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Greaves, A. 2010. The Land of Ionia: Society and Economy in the Archaic Period. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruben, G. 2014. Der Polykratische Tempel im Heraion von Samos, Samos 27, Kienast, H. J. (ed.). Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Hodos, T. 2006. Local Responses to Colonization in the Iron Age Mediterranean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Impey, O., and MacGregor, A. (eds.) 1985. The Origins of Museums: The Cabinet of Curiosities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth Century Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Isler, H. P. 1967. “Etruskischer Bucchero aus dem Heraion von Samos,” Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung 82: 7788.Google Scholar
Kaplan, P. 2006. “Dedications to Greek Sanctuaries by Foreign Kings from the Eighth through the Sixth Centuries BCE,” Historia 55(2): 129152.Google Scholar
Kilian-Dirlmeier, I. 1985. “Fremde Weihungen in Griechischen Heiligtümern von 8. bis zum Beginn des 7. Jahrhunderts v. Chr,” Jahrbuch des römisch-germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 32: 215254.Google Scholar
Krämer, R. P. 2016. “Trading Goods – Trading Gods. Greek Sanctuaries in the Mediterranean and Their Role as Emporia and ‘Ports of Trade’ (7th–6th Century BCE),” in Distant Worlds Journal 1: 7598, http://journals.ub.uniheidelberg.de/index.php/dwj/article/view/30154 (accessed 08/27/2016).Google Scholar
Kyrieleis, H. 1993. “The Heraion at Samos,” in Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches, ed. Marinatos, N. and Hägg, R., 125153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. 1993. “The Origins of Pan-Hellenism,” in Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches, ed. Marinatos, N. and Hägg, R., 1844. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, S. 1997. “Greek and Near Eastern Art in the Age of Homer,” in New Light on a Dark Age: Exploring the Culture of Geometric Greece, ed. Langdon, S., 5671. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Morris, S. 2006. “The View from East Greece: Miletus, Samos, and Ephesus,” in Debating Orientalization. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Change in the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Riva, C. and Vella, N. C., 6684. London: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Muscarella, O. 1989. “King Midas of Phrygia and the Greeks,” in Anatolia and the Ancient Near East. Studies in Honor of Tahsin Özgüç, ed. Emre, K. and Özgüç, T., 333344. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.Google Scholar
Naso, A. 2001. “La penisola italica e l’ Anatolia (XII-V sec. a.C.),” in Der Kosmos der Artemis von Ephesos, Österreichisches Archäologisches Institut, Sonderschriften 37, ed. Muss, U., 169183. Vienna: Österreichisches Archäologisches Institut.Google Scholar
Naso, A. 2006. “Etruschi (e Italici) nei santuari greci,” in Stranieri e non cittadini nei santuari greci. Atti del convegno internazionale, ed. Naso, A., 325358. Florence: Le Monnier Università.Google Scholar
Naso, A. 2009. “Funde aus Milet XXII. Etruscan Bucchero from Miletus: Preliminary Report,” Archäologischer Anzeiger: 135–150.Google Scholar
Naso, A. 2011. “Reperti italici nei santuari greci,” in Krise und Wandel. Süditalien im 4. und 3. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Internationaler Kongress anlässlich des 65. Geburtstages von Dieter Mertens, Rom 26. bis 28. Juni 2006, ed. Neudecker, R., 3953. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Niemeier, W. D. 2014. “The Heraion at Samos,” in Aruz et al. (eds.), 295296.Google Scholar
Papalexandrou, N. 2011. “Vision and Visuality in the Study of Early Greek Religion,” in Current Approaches to Religion in Ancient Greece. Papers Presented at a Symposium at the Swedish Institute at Athens, 17–19 April 2008, ed. Haysom, M. and Wallensten, J., 253268. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen.Google Scholar
Papalexandrou, N. 2016. “From Lake Van to the Qualdaquivir: Monsters and Vision in the Preclassical Mediterranean,” in Assyria to Iberia: Art and Culture in the Iron Age, ed. Aruz, J. and Seymour, M., 263272. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Papalexandrou, N. 2017. “The Multi-Corporeality of Beings and Objects in the Mediterranean during the Orientalizing Period (7th c. BCE),” in Hybrid and Extraordinary Beings. Deviations from “Normality” in Ancient Greek Mythology and Modern Medicine, ed. Soucacos, P., Gartziou-Tatti, A., and Paschopoulos, M., 4154. Athens: Konstadaras.Google Scholar
Papalexandrou, N. 2021a. Bronze Monsters and the Cultures of Wonder: Griffin Cauldrons in the Preclassical Mediterranean. Austin: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Papalexandrou, N. 2021b. “Caves as Sites of Sensory and Cognitive Enhancement: The Idaean Cave on Crete,” in Cave and Worship in Ancient Greece: New Approaches to Landscape and Ritual, ed. Nagel, A. and Katsarou, S., 4969. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Poliquin, R. 2012. The Breathless Zoo: Taxidermy and the Cultures of Longing. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pomian, K. 1990. Collectors and Curiosities. Paris and Venice, 1550–1800, trans. Elizabeth Wiles-Portier. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. 2006. Kommos: A Minoan Harbor Town and Greek Sanctuary in Southern Crete. Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens.Google Scholar
Söldner, M. 1994. “Ein italischer Dreifusswagen in Olympia,” in 9. Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Olympia, ed. Kunze, E., 209226. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Strøm, I. 1998. “The Early Sanctuary of the Argive Heraion and Its External Relations (8th–Early 6th Cent. B.C.),” Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens 1: 36126.Google Scholar
Strøm, I. 2000. “A Fragment of an Early Etruscan Bronze Throne in Olympia?Proceedings of the Danish Institute at Athens 3: 6795.Google Scholar
Vassileva, M. 2014. “Phrygian Bronzes in the Greek World: Globalization through Cult?” in Melammu. The Ancient World in an Age of Globalization, Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of the Melammu Project, Sophia, Bulgaria, September 1–8, 2008, ed. Geller, M. J., 217234. Berlin: Edition Open Access.Google Scholar
Völling, T. 1998. “Ein phrygischer Gürtel au Olympia,” Archäologischer Anzeiger 1998: 243252.Google Scholar
Von Graeve, V. 2013. “Das Aphrodite-Heiligtum von Milet und seine Weihegaben,” in Sanktuar und Ritual. Heilige Plätze im archäologischen Befund, ed. Raue, D. and Gerlach, I., 517. Rahden: Leidorf.Google Scholar
Walter, H., Clemente, A., and Niemeier, W. D. 2019. Ursprung und frühzeit des Heraion von Samos, Samos 21.1., ed. Niemeier, W. D.. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×