Introduction

In Slovenian (and in former Yugoslav) civil procedure, party access to relevant information and documents, which are in the possession of the opponent and which could adversely affect the opponent's case, is limited. Traditionally, based on a German and Austrian heritage of civil procedure, the principle that no one is obliged to help his adversary win the case (nemo tenetur edere contra se) applied. Experience and recent developments abroad – not only in common law jurisdictions, which have for a long time embraced broad duties to disclose, but also in civil law systems which were traditionally restrictive in requiring the parties to contribute to the establishment of the true facts – show that this approach needs to be re-examined.

The alternative to the principle that the party to a civil case cannot be obliged to ‘put weapons in the hand of its opponent’ is the common law concept of disclosure of documents. Thereby especially the English Civil Procedure Rules of 1998 (which have done away with some extremes of discovery) seem to be an important source of inspiration for Legislatures in civil law jurisdictions nowadays. The main idea of ‘disclosure’ is that the parties should as early as possible give advance notice of all relevant documents – not just those supporting their case but including those which adversely affect their case or which support the other party's case.