Allen, J. A. (1880) History of North American pinnipeds. A monograph of walruses, sea lions, sea bears and seals of Northern America. United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories, Miscellaneous Publication, 12, 1–785. [Reprinted in 1974; New York: Arno Press.]Google Scholar

Árnason, U. (1977). The relationship between the four principal pinniped karyotypes. Hereditas, 87, 227–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Árnason, U., Gullberg, A., Janke, A., et al. (2006). Pinniped phylogeny and a new hypothesis for their origin and dispersal. Molecular Phylogenetic and Evolution, 41, 345--54.

Barnes, L. G. and Mitchell, E. D. (1975). Late Cenozoic northeast Pacific Phocidae. Rapports et Procés-verbaux des Réunions, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 169, 34–42.Google Scholar

Barnes, L. G., Domning, D. P., and Ray, C. E. (1985). Status of studies on fossil marine mammals. Marine Mammal Science, 1, 15–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berta, A. and Wyss, A. R. (1990). Technical comments. Oldest pinniped. Science, 248, 499–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berta, A., and Wyss, A. R. (1994). Pinniped phylogeny. [In Contributions in Marine Mammal Paleontology Honoring Frank C. Whitmore, Jr., ed. Berta, A. and Deméré, T. A..] Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 33–56.Google Scholar

Berta, A. and Sumich, J. L. (1999). Marine Mammals. Evolutionary Biology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Berta, A., Ray, C. E., and Wyss, A. R. (1989). Skeleton of the oldest known pinniped, Enaliarctos mealsi. Science, 244, 60–2.Google ScholarPubMed

Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. and Russell, A. P. (1996). A morphological perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of the extant Phocid seals (Mammalia: Carnivora: Phocidae). Bonner Zoologische Monographien, 41, 1–256.Google Scholar

Bohaska, D. J. (1998). Fossil marine mammals of the Lower Miocene Pollack Farm Site, Delaware. [In Geology and Paleontology of the Lower Miocene Pollack Farm Fossil Site, Delaware.] Delaware Geological Survey Special Publication, 21, 179–91.Google Scholar

Chapskii, K. K. (1955). An attempt at revision of the systematics and diagnostics of seals of the subfamily Phocinae. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, Leningrad, 17, 160–99. [Original in Russian; English translation by Jeletzky, T. F. (1957). Fisheries Research of Canada, Translation Series, 114.]Google Scholar

Chapskii, K. K. (1961). Current status and problems in the systematics of pinnipeds. Trudy Soveshchania Ikhtiologicheskoy komissii. Akademya Nauk SSSR, 12, 138–49.Google Scholar

Chapskii, K. K. (1971). Systematic rank and subgeneric differentiation of seals (of the subfamily Monachinae). Trudy Atlantic Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Institute Rybnogo Khoziaistva e Okeanography (ATLANTNIRO), Kaliningrad, 39, 305–16. [Original in Russian; English translation (1974). Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Translation Series, 3185.]Google Scholar

Chapskii, K. K. (1974). In defense of classical taxonomy of the seals of the family Phocidae. In Theoretical Questions on the Systematics and Phylogeny of Animals, pp. 282–334. Leningrad: Nauka. [In Russian.]Google Scholar

Davies, J. L. (1958a). Pleistocene geography and the distribution of northern pinnipeds. Ecology, 39, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, J. L. (1958b). The Pinnipedia: an essay in zoogeography. Geographical Review, 48, 474–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollo, L. (1909). The fossil vertebrates of Belgium. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 19(Part 1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erxleben, J. C. P. (1777). Systema Regni Animalis per Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Varietates cum Synonymia et Historia Animalivm, Classis I: Mammalia. Lipsiae: Impensis Weygandianis.

Farris, J. S. (1988). Hennig 86, Version 1.5. New York: Port Jefferson Station.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. J. (1988). Ancestry of sea mammals. Nature, 334, 383–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flynn, J. J., Neff, N. A., and Tedford, R. H. (1988). Phylogeny of the Carnivora. In The Phylogenetic Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2: Mammals, ed. M. J. Benton, pp. 73–116. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Friant, M. (1947). Recherches sur le fémur des Phocidae. Bulletin du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 23, 1–51.Google Scholar

Gervais, P. (1853). Description de Quelques ossements de Phoques et de Cétacés. Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences de Montpellier, Paris, 2, 307–14.Google Scholar

Gervais, P. (1859). Zoologie et Paleontologie françaises: Nouvelles Recherches sur les Animaux Vertébrés, 2nd edn. Paris: Arthus Bertrand.Google Scholar

Gill, T. N. (1866). Prodrome of a monograph of the pinnipedes. Proceedings Essex Institute, Salem, Communications, 5, 3–13.Google Scholar

Gill, T. N. (1872). Arrangement of the Families of Mammals, with analytical tables. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 11, 1–98.Google Scholar

Gistel, N. F. X. (1848). Naturgeschichte des Thierreichs für höhere Schulen. Stuttgart: Hoffmann.Google Scholar

Grassé, P.-P. (ed.) (1955). Traité de zoologie. Anatomie Systematique, BiologieParis, 27, 568–668.Google Scholar

Gray, J. E. (1821). On the natural arrangement of vertebrose animals. London Medical Repository, 15, 296–310.Google Scholar

(1844/1875). The Zoology of the Voyage of H. M. S. Erebus and Terror, Under the Command of Captain Sir James Clark Ross, N. N., F. R. S., During the years 1839 to 1843, Part 1; Mammalia. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longman. [In the Catalogue of the Specimens of Mammalia in the Collection of the British Museum.]

Gray, J. E. (1850). Part 2: Seals. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longman. [In the Catalogue of the Specimens of Mammalia in the Collection of the British Museum.]Google Scholar

Gray, J. E. (1869). The sea elephant (Morunga proboscidea) at the Falkland Islands. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4, 1–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasegawa, Y., Tomida, Y., Kohno, N., et al. (1988). Quaternary vertebrates from Shiriya area, Shimokita Peninsula, northeastern Japan. Memoirs of the National Science Museum, 21, 17–36.Google Scholar

Hendey, Q. B. (1972). The evolution and dispersal of the Monachinae (Mammalia: Pinnipedia). Annals of the South African Museum, 59, 99–113.Google Scholar

Hendey, Q. B. (1978). The Pliocene fossil occurrences in “E” Quarry, Langebaanweg, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 69, 215–47.Google Scholar

Hendey, Q. B. and Repenning, C. A. (1972). A Pliocene phocid from South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum, 59, 71–98.Google Scholar

Hermann, J. (1779). Beschreibung der Münchs-Robbe. Beschäftigungen der Berlinischen Gesellschaft naturforschender Freunde, Berlin, 4, 456–509.Google Scholar

Howell, A. B. (1930). Aquatic Mammals. Baltimore, MD: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Hunt, R. M., Jr. and Barnes, L. G. (1994). Basicranial evidence for ursid affinity of the oldest pinnipeds. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 57–67.Google Scholar

Kellogg, A. R. (1922). Pinnipeds from Miocene and Pleistocene deposits of California. A description of a new genus and species of sea lion from the Temblor together with seal remains from the Santa Margarita and San Pedro Formations and a resume of current theories regarding origin of Pinnipedia. University of California Publications, Bulletin of the Department of Geological Sciences, 13, 23–132.Google Scholar

King, J. E. (1956). The monk seals (genus Monachus). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 3, 201–56.Google Scholar

King, J. E. (1960). Sea-lions of the genera Neophoca and Phocarctos. Mammalia, 24, 445–56.Google Scholar

King, J. E. (1964). Seals of the World. London: British Museum (Natural History) Publications.Google Scholar

King, J. E. (1966). Relationships of the hooded and elephant seal (genera Cystophora and Mirounga). Zoological Journal, 148, 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, J. E. (1983). Seals of the World, 2nd edn. Ithaca, NY: Comstock.Google Scholar

Koretsky, (=Koretskaya) I. A. (1987a). Sexual dimorphism in the structure of the humerus and femur of Monachopsis pontica (Pinnipedia: Phocinae). Vestnik Zoologii, 4, 77–82. [In Russian.]Google Scholar

Koretsky, (=Koretskaya) I. A. (1987b). The position of the genus Praepusa in the Phocinae system. Praeprint/Akademii Nauk Ukrainian SSR. Institute of Zoology, 87, 3–7. [In Russian.]Google Scholar

Koretsky, (=Koretskaya) I. A. (2001). Morphology and systematics of Miocene Phocinae (Mammalia: Carnivora) from Paratethys and the North Atlantic region. Geologica Hungarica, Budapest, 54, 1–109.Google Scholar

Koretsky, I. A. and Holec, P. (2002). A primitive seal (Mammalia: Phocidae) from the early middle Miocene of Central Paratethys. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 163–78.Google Scholar

Koretsky, I. A. and Sanders, A. (2002). Paleontology of the Late Oligocene Ashley and Chandler Bridge Formations of South Carolina, 1: Paleogene pinniped remains; the oldest known seal (Carnivora: Phocidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 93, 179–84.Google Scholar

Leidy, J. (1853). The ancient fauna of Nebraska. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, 6, 1–126.Google Scholar

Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus and Differentiis, 10th edn, Reformata, Vol. I. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.Google Scholar

Matschie, P. (1905). Eine Robbe von Laysan. Beschäftigungen Gessellschaft Naturforschender Freunde, Berlin, 254--62.

McKenna, M. C. and Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

McLaren, I. A. (1960a). Are the Pinnipedia biphyletic?Systematic Zoology, 9, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaren, I. A. (1960b). On the origin of the Caspian and Baikal seals and the paleoclimatological implications. American Journal of Science, 258, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misonne, X. (1958). Faune du Tertiaire et du Pleistocene inferieur de Belgique. (Oiseaux et Mammiferes). Bulletin du Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 34, 1–36.Google Scholar

Mitchell, E. D. (1966). The Miocene pinniped Allodesmus. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 61, 1–105.Google Scholar

Mitchell, E. D. (1967). Controversy over diphyly in pinnipeds. Systematic Zoology, 16, 350–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, E. D. (1968). The Mio-Pliocene pinniped Imagotaria. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 25, 1843–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, E. D. (1975). Parallelism and convergence in the evolution of Otariidae and Phocidae. Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 169, 12–26.Google Scholar

Mivart, St. G. (1885). Notes on the Pinnipedia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, 1885, 484–500.Google Scholar

Morgan, G. S. (1994). Miocene and Pliocene marine mammal faunas from the Bone Valley Formation of Central Florida. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 29, 239–68.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1981a). Premier signalement de Monachinae (Phocidae: Mammalia) dans le Sahèlien (Miocène Supérieue) d'Oran (Algérie). Palaeovertebrata, 11, 181–94.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1981b). Les vertébrés fossiles de la formation Pisco (Pérou). Première partie. Deux nouveaux Monachinae (Phocidae, Mammalia) du Pliocène du Sud-Sacaco. Institut Français d'Études Andines, 6, 1–150.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1981c). Le grand voyage des Phoques. La RechercheParis, 12, 750–2.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1982a). Phocid phylogeny and dispersal. Annals of the South African Museum, 89, 175–213.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1982b). Les relations phylogenetiques des Lutrinae (Mustelidae, Mammalia). Geobios, M moire Special, 6, 259–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muizon, C. (1982c). Dispersion des Monachinae (Phocidae, Mammalia) dans L'Hemisphere Sud. 9–eme Réunion Annuelle Sciences de la Terre, pp. 1--463. Paris: Socit Gologique de France.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. (1992). Paläontologie. In Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas, ed. Duguy, R. and Robineau, D., Vol. 6: Meeressäuger. Part II: Robben – Pinnipedia. pp. 34–41. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.Google Scholar

Muizon, C. and Bond, M. (1982). Le Phocidae (Mammalia) Miocène de la formation Parana (Entre Rios, Argentina). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, (Série 4, section C) 3–4, 165–207.Google Scholar

Muizon, C., , and Hendey., Q. B. (1980). Late Tertiary seals of the South Atlantic Ocean. Annals of the South African Museum, 82, 91–128.Google Scholar

Ognev,, S. I. (1935). Mammals of the USSR and Adjacent Countries, Vol. 3: Carnivora, pp. 1--752. Moscow: Glavpushnina. [In Russian; English translations by A. Birron, and Z. S. Coles (1962), the Israel Program for Scientific translations.]

Pavlinov, I. J. and Rossolimo, O. L. (1987). Systematics of Mammalia of the Soviet Union. Moscow: Moscow University [In Russian.]Google Scholar

Ray, C. E. (1976a). Geography of phocid evolution. Systematic Zoology, 25, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, C. E. (1976b). Phoca wymani and other Tertiary seals (Mammalia: Phocidae) described from the eastern seaboard of North America. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 28, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reidman, M. (1990). The Pinnipeds. Seals, Sea Lions, and Walruses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Repenning, C. A. (1975). Otarioid evolution. Rapports et Proces-verbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 169, 27–33.Google Scholar

Repenning, C. A. (1976). Adaptive evolution of sea lions and walruses. Systematic Zoology, 25, 375–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Repenning, C. A. (1983). Faunal exchanges between Siberia and North America. Proceedings of the American Quaternary Association, Conference, 5, 40–55.Google Scholar

Repenning, C. A. (1990). Technical comments. Oldest pinniped. Science, 248, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Repenning, C. A. and Ray, C. E. (1977). The origin of the Hawaiian Monk seal. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 89, 667–88.Google Scholar

Repenning, C. A. and Tedford, R. H. (1977). Otarioid seals of the Neogene. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 992, 1–93.Google Scholar

Repenning, C. A., Ray, C. E., and Grigorescu, D. (1979). Pinniped biogeo-graphy. In Historical Biogeography, Plate Tectonics, and the Changing Environment, ed. Gray, J. and Boucot, A. J., pp. 357–69. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar

Robinette, H. and Stains, H. J. (1970). Comparative study of the calcanea of the Pinnipedia. Journal of Mammalogy, 51, 1–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, D. E. and Russell, D. E. (1983). Mammalian Paleofaunas of the World. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Scheffer, V. B. (1958). Seals, Sea Lions, and Walruses. A Review of the Pinnipedia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. (1945). The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 85, 1–350.Google Scholar

Sokolov, V. E. (1979). Systematika Mlekopitauzchich [Systematics of Mammals]: Cetacea, Pinnipedia, Carnivora, Tublidentata, Tylopoda, Perissodactyla. Moscow: High School. [In Russian.]Google Scholar

Tavani, G. (1941--2). Revisione dei resti del Pinnipede conservato nel Museo di Geologia di Pisa. Palaeontographica Italica, Memorie di Paleontologia, 40, 97–113.Google Scholar

Tavani, G. (1942--3). Revisione dei resti di Pinnipedi conservati nel Museo geo-paleontologica di Firenze. Atti della Societá Toscana di Scienze Naturali, 5, 3–11.Google Scholar

Tedford, R. H. (1976). Relationship of pinnipeds to other carnivores (Mammalia). Systematic Zoology, 25, 363–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toula, F. (1897). Phoca vindobonensis n. sp. von Nussdorf. Beiträge zur Paläontologie und Geologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, Mittheilungen des Paläontologischen Institutes der Universität Wien, 11, 47–70.Google Scholar

Trouessart, E.-L. (1897). Carnivora, Pinnipedia, Rodentia I. Fascicle II. In Catalogus Mammalium tam Viventium quam Fossilium, new edn, pp. 219–452. Berlin: R. Friedländer.Google Scholar

Trouessart, E. -L. (1904). Primates, Prosimiae, Chiroptera, Insectivora, Carnivora, Pinnipedia. Fascicle I. In Catalogus Mammalium tam Viventium quam Fossilium Quinquennale Supplementum (1904), p. 288. Berlin: R. Friedländer.Google Scholar

Trouessart, E. -L. (1905). Cetacea, Edentata, Marsupialia, Allotheria, Monotremata. Fascicle IV. In Catalogus Mammalium tam Viventium quam Fossilium. Quinquennale Supplementum (1899–1904), pp. 753–929. Berlin: R. Friedländer.Google Scholar

True, F. W. (1906). Diagnosis of a new genus and species of fossil sea-lion from the Miocene of Oregon. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 48, 47–9.Google Scholar

Ugolini, R. (1900). Di uno scheletro fossile di Foca trovato ad Orciano. Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Naturali, Pisa, 12, 146–8.Google Scholar

Ugolini, R. (1902). Il Monachus albiventer Bodd. del Pliocene di Orciano Paleontographica Italica. Memorie de Paleontologia, Pisa, 8, 1–21.Google Scholar

Beneden, P.-J. (1876). Les Phoques Fosiles du basin d'Anvers. Bulletin de l'Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Baux-Arts de Belgique 41, 783–802.Google Scholar

Beneden, P.-J. (1877). Description des ossements fossiles des environs d'Anvers, première partie. Pinnipèdes ou Amphithèriens. Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, Annales, 1, 1–88.Google Scholar

Bree, P. J. H. and Erdbrink, D. P. B. (1987). Fossil Phocidae in some Dutch collections (Mammalia, Carnivora). Beaufortia, 37, 43–66.Google Scholar

Walsh, S. and Naish, D. (2002). Fossil seals from late Neogene deposits in South America: a new pinniped (Carnivora, Mammalia) assemblage from Chile. Paleontology, 45, 821–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiig, . (1983). On the relationships of Pinnipeds to other Carnivores. Zoologica Scripta, 12, 225–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wozencraft, C. (1989). The phylogeny of the Recent Carnivora. In Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution, ed. Gittleman, J. L., pp. 495–535. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R. (1987). The walrus auditory region and monophyly of pinnipeds. American Museum Novitates, 2871, 1–31.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R. (1988a). Evidence from flipper structure for a single origin of pinnipeds. Nature, 334, 427–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wyss, A. R. (1988b). On “retrogression” in the evolution of the Phocinae and phylogenetic affinities of the monk seals. American Museum Novitates, 2924, 1–38.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R. (1994). The evolution of body size in phocids: some ontogenetic and phylogenetic observations. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History. 29, 69–77.Google Scholar

Wyss, A. R. and Flynn, J. J. (1993). A phylogenetic analysis and definition of the Carnivora. In Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals, ed. Szalay, F. S., Novacek, M. J., and McKenna, M. C., pp. 32–52. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar