Book contents
- Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis
- Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Setting the scene
- Part II Ideas and challenges
- 2 Listening and meaning: how a model of mental layers informs electroacoustic music analysis
- 3 Forming form
- 4 Interactive and generative music: a quagmire for the musical analyst
- 5 Some ideas concerning the relationship between form and texture
- Part III Harnessing new forces
- Part IV Analyses of key works
- Index
- References
2 - Listening and meaning: how a model of mental layers informs electroacoustic music analysis
from Part II - Ideas and challenges
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016
Book contents
- Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis
- Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Part I Setting the scene
- Part II Ideas and challenges
- 2 Listening and meaning: how a model of mental layers informs electroacoustic music analysis
- 3 Forming form
- 4 Interactive and generative music: a quagmire for the musical analyst
- 5 Some ideas concerning the relationship between form and texture
- Part III Harnessing new forces
- Part IV Analyses of key works
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis , pp. 31 - 57Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Brandt, P. A. 2004. Spaces, Domains, and Meaning: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics. Vol. 4: European Semiotics: Language, Cognition, and Culture. Bern: Peter Long.Google Scholar
Brandt, P. A. 2006. Form and meaning in art. In Turner, M. (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. 2006. Jonathan Harvey’s Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco. In Simoni, M. (ed.), Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dirks, P. L. 2012. An analysis of Jonathan Harvey’s ‘Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco.’ http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/9_2/dirks.html (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
Donald, M. 2001. A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 2006. Music as communication. In Turner, M. (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. 1981. Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco: A Realization at IRCAM. Computer Music Journal, 5(4), 22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, J. 1990. Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco. On Computer Music Currents 5. Wergo CD, WER 2025–2.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. and Lerdahl, F. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, G. 2014. The feeling blend: Feeling and emotion in electroacoustic art. Organised Sound, 19(2), 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, J. 2002. Karlheinz Stockhausen: Telemusik (1966). In Licata, T. (ed.), Electroacoustic Music: Analytical Perspectives. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. 1975. Frame System Theory. In Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P. C. (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2005. Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. New York: iUniverse, Inc.Google Scholar
Pöppel, E. 1997. A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pöppel, E. 1998. Mindworks: Time and Conscious Experience. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectromorphology and structuring processes. In Emmerson, S. (ed.), The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining sound-shapes. Organised Sound, 2(2), 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 2000. The aesthetics of computer music: A questionable concept reconsidered. Organised Sound, 5(3), 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessel, D. 1990. Liner notes for Antony (1977). On Computer Music Currents 10, Wergo CD, WE119.Google Scholar
Wright, R. D. and Ward, L. M. 2008. Orienting of Attention. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by