Ackert, L., B. K. Church, and G. P. Dwyer (2005) ‘When the Shoe is on the Other Foot: Experimental Evidence on Evaluation Disparities’ Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper.

Addelman, S. (1962) ‘Orthogonal Main-Effect Plans for Asymmetrical Factorial Experiments.’ Technometrics 4: 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldenderfer, M. S. and Blashfield, R. K. (1984) Cluster Analysis. University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alfnes, F. and Rickertsen, K. (2003) ‘European Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ali, M. M. (1997) ‘Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors’ Journal of Political Economy 85: 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allenby, G. M. and Rossi, P. E. (1999) ‘Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity’ Journal of Econometrics 89: 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. (2003) ‘Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves without Stable Preferences’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 73–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, C. R. (1931) ‘The Place of Farm Accounting in Extension’ Journal of Farm Economics 13: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, L., Darke, P. R., and Schaller, M. (2005) ‘No One Wants to Look Cheap: Trade-Offs Between Social Disincentives and the Economic and Psychological Incentives to Redeem Coupons’ Journal of Consumer Psychology 15: 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ausubel, L. M. and P. C. Cramton (1996) ‘Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions’ Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Maryland.

Azevedo, C. D., Herriges, J. A., and Kling, C. L. (2003) ‘Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baik, K. H., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., and Shogren, J. (1999) ‘Endogenous Timing in a Gaming Tournament’ Theory and Decision 47: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balistreri, E., McClelland, G., Poe, G., and Schulze, W. (2001) ‘Can Hypothetical Questions Reveal True Values? A Laboratory Comparison of Dichotomous Choice and Open-Ended Contingent Values with Auction Values’ Environmental and Resource Economics 18: 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateman, I., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. (1997) ‘A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., and Marschak, J. (1964) ‘Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method’ Behavioural Science 9: 226–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bennett, J. W. (1983) ‘Validating Revealed Preferences’ Economic Analysis and Policy 13: 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, J. W. (1987) ‘Strategic Behavior: Some Experimental Evidence’ Journal of Public Economics 32: 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, J. E., R. Forsythe, F. Nelson, and T. Rietz (2006) ‘Results from a Dozen Years of Election Futures Markets Research’ in Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. Plott, C. and Smith, V. (eds.) Amsterdam: Elsevier, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and McCabe, K. (2005) ‘Risk Preference Instability Across Institutions: A Dilemma’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 4209–4214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Berg, J., J. W. Dickhaut, and T. A. Rietz (2004) ‘Preference Reversals: The Impact of Truth-Revealing Incentives’ Working Paper, Department of Accounting, University of Iowa, June.

Bernard, J. C. (2005) ‘Evidence of Affiliation of Values in a Repeated Trial Auction Experiment’ Applied Economics Letters 12: 687–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, J. C. (2006) ‘Finding and Retaining the Dominant Strategy: The Second-Price, English, and “Sealed Offer” English Auctions’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, J. C. and Schulze, W. (2005) ‘The Next New Thing: Curiosity and the Motivation to Purchase Novel Products’ Economics Bulletin 3: 1–8.Google Scholar

Berry, S., J.Levinsohn, , and Pakes, A. (1995) ‘Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium’ Econometrica 63: 841–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., and Payne, J. W. (1998) ‘Constructive Consumer Choice Processes’ Journal of Consumer Research 25: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, R. and Heberlein, T. (1979) ‘Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Direct Measures Biased?’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 926–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, M., Harrison, G., and Rutström, E. E. (1994) ‘Statistical Bias Functions and Informative Hypothetical Surveys’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 1084–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blondel, S. and Javahéri, M. (2004) ‘Valuing Organic Farming: An Experimental Study of the Consumer’ Acta Horticulturae 655: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boardman, A. E., Weimer, D., Greenberg, D., and Vining, A. (2005) Cost Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 3rd edn Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bohm, P. (1972) ‘Estimating Demand for Public Goods: An Experiment’ European Economic Review 3: 111–130.CrossRef

Bohm, P. (1984) ‘Are There Practicable Demand-Revealing Mechanisms?’ in Public Finance and the Quest for Efficiency, Hanusch, H. (ed.) Detroit: Wayne State U. Press.Google Scholar

Bohm, P. (1994) ‘Behavior under Uncertainty without Preference Reversal: A Field Experiment’ Empirical Economics 19: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, P., Lindén, J., and Sonnegård, J. (1997) ‘Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanisms vs. Markets’ Economic Journal 107: 1079–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyce, R. R., Brown, T. C., McClelland, G. H., Peterson, G. L., and Schulze, W. D. (1992) ‘An Experimental Examination of Intrinsic Values as a Source of the WTA-WTP Disparity’ American Economic Review 82: 1366–1373.Google Scholar

Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. (1952) ‘Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs. I. The Method of Paired Comparisons’ Biometrika 39: 324–345.Google Scholar

Brookshire, D. S. and Coursey, D. L. (1987) ‘Measuring the Value of a Public Good: An Empirical Comparison of Elicitation Procedures’ American Economic Review 77: 554–566.Google Scholar

Brookshire, D. S., Coursey, D. L., and Schulze, W. D. (1987) ‘The External Validity of Experimental Economics Techniques: Analysis of Demand Behavior’ Economic Inquiry 25: 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J., Cranfield, J. A. L., and Henson, S. (2005) ‘Relating Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Food Safety to Risk Tolerance: An Experimental Approach’ Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, T. C. (2005) ‘Loss Aversion Without the Endowment Effect, and Other Explanations for the WTA–WTP Disparity’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 57: 245–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brundtland, G. (2001) How Safe is Our Food? Statement by the Director-General, World Health Organization [http://www.who.int/fsf/].

Buchinsky, M. (1994) ‘Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure 1963–1987: Application of Quantile Regression’ Econometrica 62: 405–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buhr, B. L., Hayes, D. J., Shogren, J. F., and Kliebenstein, J. B. (1993) ‘Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers’ Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 18: 175–184.Google Scholar

Bull, C., Schotter, A., and Weigelt, K. (1987) ‘Tournaments and Piece Rates: An Experimental Study’ Journal of Political Economy 95: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzby, J., T. Roberts, C. T. J. Lin, and J. MacDonald (1996) ‘Bacterial Foodborne Disease: Medical Costs and Productivity Losses’ Agricultural Economics Report No. 741, August.

Camerer, C. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Camerer, C., and Hogarth, R. (1999) ‘The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, A., J., Kinsey, and C. Nadav (1998) ‘Who Eats What, When, and From Where?’ Working Paper 98–05, St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Retail Food Industry Center.

Carpenter, J. P., J. Holmes, and P. H. Matthews (2004) ‘Charity Auctions: A Field Experimental Investigation’ IZA Discussion Paper No. 1330. October.

Carson, R., T. Groves, and M. Machina (2000) ‘Incentive and Informational Properties Preference Questions.’ Paper presented at the Kobe Conference on Theory and Application of Environmental Valuation. Kobe: Kobe University, January.

Cherry, T. L. and Shogren, J. F. (2006) ‘Rationality crossovers’ Journal of Economic Psychology forthcoming.Google Scholar

Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., Shogren, J. F., List, J. A., and Sullivan, M. B. (2004) ‘Laboratory Testbeds and Non-Market Valuation: The Case of Bidding Behavior in a Second-Price Auction with an Outside Option’ Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherry, T. L., Crocker, T., and Shogren, J. F. (2003) ‘Rationality Spillovers’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chu, Y. P, and Chu, R. L. (1990) ‘The Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Marketlike Experimental Settings’ American Economic Review 80: 902–911.Google Scholar

Clemen, R. (1989) ‘Combining Forecasts: A Review and Annotated Bibliography’ International Journal of Forecasting 5: 559–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochrane, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1957) Experimental Designs, 2nd edn. New York: NY, Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Conant, J. (1951) Science and Common Sense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Coppinger, V. M., Smith, V. L., and Titus, J. A. (1980) ‘Incentives and Behavior in English, Dutch, and Sealed-Bid Auctions’ Economic Inquiry 43: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, J. R. (2005) ‘Is the Experimental Auction a Dynamic Market?’ Environmental and Resource Economics 31: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, J. R. and Rousu, M. (2006a) ‘The Effect of Initial Endowments in Experimental Auctions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 448–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, J. R. and Rousu, M. (2006b) ‘Posted Prices and Bid Affiliation: Evidence from Experimental Auctions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, J. R. and M. Rousu (2006c) ‘Demand Curve Shifts in Multi-Unit Auctions: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment’ Working Paper, Department of Economics, Kenyon University.

Coursey, D. L., Hovis, J. L., and Schulze, W. D. (1987) ‘The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, R. C., B. Roberson, and V. L. Smith (1982) ‘Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions’ in Smith, V. L. (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics Vol. 2. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Cox, J. C., Smith, V. L., and Walker, J. M. (1992) ‘Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions: Comment’ American Economic Review 82: 1392–1412.Google Scholar

Cragg, J. G. (1971) ‘Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods’ Econometrica 39: 829–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crocker, T. and J. F. Shogren (1991) ‘Preference Learning and Contingent Valuation Methods’ in Dietz, F., Ploeg, R., and Straaten, J. (eds.) Environmental Policy and the Economy. Amsterdam: North-Holland pp. 77–93.Google Scholar

Crocker, T. D., Shogren, J. F., and Turner, P. R. (1998) ‘Incomplete Beliefs and Nonmarket Valuation’ Resource & Energy Economics 20: 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crutchfield, S. J., T. Buzby, M. Ollinger Roberts, and C.-T. J. Lin (1997) ‘An Economic Assessment of Food Safety Regulations: The New Approach to Meat and Poultry Inspection’ Agricultural Economic Report Number 755, ERS, USDA, Washington, DC.

Cummings, R., Brookshire, D., and Schulze, W. (1986) Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar

Cummings, R. and Taylor, L. (1999) ‘Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method’ American Economic Review 83: 649–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummings, R., Holt, C., and Laury, S. K. (2004) ‘Using Laboratory Experiments for Policymaking: An Example from the Georgia Irrigation Reduction Auction’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Modeling 23: 342–363.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, P. and Maskin, E. (2000) ‘Efficient Auctions’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 341–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, D. D. and Holt, C. A. (1993) Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Finetti, B. (1974) Theory of Probability, Vol. I, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Dhar, T. and Foltz, J. D. (2005) ‘Milk by Any Other Name … Consumer Benefits from Labeled Milk’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, P. A. and Hausman, J. A. (1994) ‘Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickie, M., Fisher, A., and Gerking, S. (1987) ‘Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study’ Journal of American Statistical Association 82: 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dickinson, D. L. and Bailey, D. (2002) ‘Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It?’ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 27: 348–364.Google Scholar

Dickinson, D. L. and Bailey, D. (2005) ‘Experimental Evidence on Willingness to Pay for Red Meat Traceability in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan’ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37: 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauro, Di C. and Maffioletti, A. (1996) ‘An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Ambiguity on the Valuation of Self-Insurance and Self-Protection’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13: 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ding, M., Grewal, R., and Liechty, J. (2005) ‘Incentive-Aligned Conjoint Analysis’ Journal of Marketing Research 42: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drago, R. and Heywood, J. (1989) ‘Tournaments, Piece Rates, and the Shape of the Payoff Function’ Journal of Political Economy 97: 992–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drago, R., Garvey, G., and Turnbull, G. (1996) ‘A Collective Tournament’ Economics Letters 50: 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenberg, R., Boganno, M. (1990) ‘Do Tournaments have Incentive Effects?’ Journal of Political Economy 98 : 1307–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eigenraam, M., Strappazzon, L., Lansdell, N., Ha, A., Beverly, C., and Todd, J. (2006) ‘EcoTender: Auction for Multiple Environmental Outcomes’ National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality National Market Based Instruments Pilot Program. Project Final Report. Department of Primary Industries, Victoria, Australia, February.Google Scholar

Feldkamp, T, Schroeder, T. C., and Lusk, J. L. (2005) ‘Determining Consumer Valuation of Quality Differentiated Beef Steak Attributes’ Journal of Muscle Foods 16: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feuz, D. M., Umberger, W. J., Calkins, C. R., and Sitz, B. (2004) ‘U.S. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Flavor and Tenderness in Steaks as Determined with an Experimental Auction' Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29: 501–516.Google Scholar

Food Traceability Report (2002) ‘EU Parliament Approves Strict Traceability for GM Foods’ <http://www.foodtraceabilityreport.com/>. Accessed August 1.

Forsythe, R. and Isaac, R. M. (1982) ‘Demand-Revealing Mechanisms for Private Good Auctions,’ in Smith, Vernon (ed.) Research in Experimental Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., Vol. 2, pp. 45–61.Google Scholar

Forsythe, R., Nelson, F., Neumann, G. R., and Wright, J. (1992) ‘Anatomy of an Experimental Political Stock Market’ American Economic Review 82: 1142–1161.Google Scholar

Fox, J. A., Hayes, D. J., Kliebenstein, J. B., and Shogren, J. F. (1994) ‘Consumer Acceptability of Milk from Cows Treated with Bovine Somatotropin’ Journal of Dairy Science 77: 703–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fox, J. A., Buhr, B. L., Shogren, J. F., Kliebenstein, J. B., and Hayes, D. J. (1995) ‘A Comparison of Preferences for Pork Sandwiches Produced from Animals with and without Somatotropin Administration’ Journal of Animal Science 73: 1048–1054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fox, J. A. and Olson, D. G. (1998) ‘Market Trials of Irradiated Chicken’ Radiation Physics and Chemistry 52: 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, J. A., Shogren, J. F., Hayes, D. J., and Kliebenstein, J. B. (1998) ‘CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, J. A., Hayes, D. J., and Shogren, J. F. (2002) ‘Consumer Preferences for Food Irradiation: How Favorable and Unfavorable Descriptions Affect Preferences for Irradiated Pork in Experimental Auctions’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24: 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franciosi, R., Isaac, R. M., Pingry, D. E., and Reynolds, S. S. (1993) ‘An Experimental Investigation of the Hahn-Noll Revenue Neutral Auction for Emissions Licenses’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, D. and Sunder, S. (1994) Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frykblom, P. (1997) ‘Hypothetical Question Modes and Real Willingness to Pay’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34: 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frykblom, P. and Shogren, J. F. (2000) ‘An Experimental Testing of Anchoring Effects in Discrete Choice Questions’ Environmental and Resource Economics 16:3: 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garret, T. and Sobel, R. (1999) ‘Gamblers Favor Skewness, Not Risk: Further Evidence from United States Lottery Games’ Economics Letters 63: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., and Allum, N. C. (1999) ‘Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S.’ Science 285: 384–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giannakas, G. and Fulton, M. (2002) ‘Consumption Effects of Genetic Modification: What if Consumers are Right?’ Agricultural Economics 27: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gloy, B. A. and LaDue, E. L. (2003) ‘Financial Management Practices and Farm Profitability’ Agricultural Financial Review 63: 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, W. M. and Einhorn, H. J. (1987) ‘Expression Theory and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon’ Psychological Review 94: 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golec, J. and Tamarkin, M. (1998) ‘Bettors Love Skewness, not Risk, at the Horse Track’ Journal of Political Economy 106: 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zivin, Graff J. S. (2006) ‘Ensuring a Safe Food Supply: The Importance of Heterogeneity’ Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 4, Article 2.Google Scholar

Greene, W. (2000) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Greene, W. (2004) ‘Interpreting Estimated Parameters and Measuring Individual Heterogeneity in Random Coefficient Models’ Working Paper, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University, May 6.

Grether, D. and Plott, C. (1979) ‘Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon’ American Economic Review 69: 623–638.Google Scholar

Grossman, S., Kihlstrom, R., and Mirman, L. (1977) ‘A Bayesian Approach to the Production of Information and Learning by Doing’ Review of Economic Studies 46: 533–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groves, R. M. (1987) ‘Research on Survey Data Quality’ Public Opinion Quarterly 51: S156–S172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gul, F. (1991) ‘A Theory of Disappointment Aversion’ Econometrica 59: 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunnersson, S., Shogren, J. F., and Cherry, T. L. (2003) ‘Are Preferences for Skewness Fixed or Fungible?’ Economics Letters 80: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammitt, J. K. and Graham, J. D. (1999) ‘Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18: 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanemann, W. M. (1984) ‘Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanemann, W. M. (1991) ‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’ American Economic Review 81: 635–647.Google Scholar

Hanemann, W. M. (1994) ‘Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanley, N., Shogren, J. F., and White, B. (2006) Introduction to Environmental Economics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harless, D. W. (1989) ‘More Laboratory Evidence on the Disparity between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 11: 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harless, D., and Camerer, C. (1994) ‘The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories’ Econometrica 62: 1251–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, G. W. (1989) ‘Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions’ American Economic Review 79: 749–762.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. W., R. Beekman, L. Brown, L. Clements, T. McDaniel, S. Odom, and M. Williams (1997) ‘Environmental Damage Assessment with Hypothetical Surveys: The Calibration Approach’ in Bowman, M., Brannlund, R., and Kriström, B. (eds.) Topics in Environmental EconomicsAmsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. W., E. Johnson, M. M. McInnes, and E. E. Rutström (2003) ‘Individual Choice in the Laboratory: Paradox Reloaded’ Working Paper, Dept. Economics, University of Central Florida, September.

Harrison, G. W., Harstad, R. M., and Rutström, E. E. (2004) ‘Experimental Methods and the Elicitation of Values’ Experimental Economics 7: 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, G. W. and List, J. A. (2004) ‘Field Experiments’ Journal of Economics Literature 42: 1009–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harstad, R. M. (2000) ‘Dominant Strategy Adoption and Bidders’ Experience with Pricing Rules' Experimental Economics 3: 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatcher, L. (1994) A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equations ModelingCary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar

Hayes, D. J., Shogren, J. F., Shin, S. U., Kliebenstein, J. B. (1995) ‘Valuing Food Safety in Experimental Auction Markets’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77: 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, J. J. (2001) ‘Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture’ Journal of Political Economy 109: 673–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heiner, R. (1983) ‘The Origin of Predictable Behavior’ American Economic Review 76: 560–595.Google Scholar

Hey, J. D. and Orme, C. (1994) ‘Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data’ Econometrica 62: 1291–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoban, T. J., and J. Burkhardt (1991) ‘Determinants of Public Acceptance in Meat and Milk Production: North America’ in Wal, P., Weber, G. M., and Wilt, F. J. (eds.) Biotechnology for Control of Growth and Product Quality in Meat Production: Implications and Acceptability. The Netherlands: Pudoc Wageningen.Google Scholar

Hobbs, J. E., Bailey, D., Dickinson, D. L., and Haghiri, M. (2005) ‘Traceability in the Canadian Red Meat Sector: Do Consumers Care?’ Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobbs, J. E., Sanderson, K., and Haghiri, M. (2006) ‘Evaluating Willingness-to-Pay for Bison Attributes: An Experimental Auction Approach’ Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 54: 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, E., Menkhaus, D., Chakravarti, D., Field, R., and Whipple, G. (1993) ‘Using Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research: A Case Study of New Packaging for Fresh Beef’ Marketing Science 12: 318–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofler, R. and List, J. A. (2004) ‘Valuation on the Frontier, Calibrating Actual and Hypothetical Statements of Value’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(1): 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, C. A. (1986) ‘Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom’ American Economic Review 76: 508–515.Google Scholar

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002) ‘Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects’ American Economic Review 92: 1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hong, C. S. and Nishimura, N. (2003) ‘Revenue Non-Equivalence between the English and the Second-Price Auctions: Experimental Evidence’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51: 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, J. K. (2005) ‘The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism is not Always Incentive Compatible, even for Non-Random Goods’ Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, March.

Horowitz, J. K. and McConnell, K. E. (2000) ‘Values Elicited from Open-Ended Real Experiments’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 41: 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, J. K., List, J. A., and McConnell, K. E. (2006) ‘A Test of Diminishing Marginal Value’ Economica, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Huber, J. and Train, K. (2001) ‘On the Similarity of Classical and Bayesian Estimates of Individual Mean Partworths’ Marketing Letters 12: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huck, S. and Weizäcker, G. (2002) ‘Do Players Correctly Estimate What Others Do? Evidence of Conservation in Beliefs’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 47: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, M. D., Coble, K. O., and Lusk, J. L. (2005) ‘Consistency of Risk Premium Measures’ Agricultural Economics 33: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huffman, W. E., Rousu, M., Shogren, J. F., and Tegene, A. (2003) ‘Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food Labels in a Market with Diverse Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions’ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28: 481–502.Google Scholar

Huffman, W. E., Rousu, M., Shogren, J. F., and Tegene, A. (2004) ‘Consumers’ Resistance to Genetically Modified Foods in the US: The Role of Information in an Uncertain Environment' Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2: Article 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ibehndahl, G., Isaacs, S., and Trimble, R. (2002) ‘Financial Information Base of Participants in FSA Borrower Training’ Journal of Extension 40.Google Scholar

Irwin, J. R., McClelland, G. H., McKee, M., Schulze, W. D., and Norden, N. E. (1998) ‘Payoff Dominance vs. Cognitive Transparency in Decision Making’ Economic Inquiry 36: 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, S. R. and Harker, R. (2005) ‘Consumer Evaluation of Novel Kiwifruit: Willingness-to-Pay’ Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 2519–2526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, S. R., Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Moore, M., Morrow, B. and Traill, W. B. (2004) ‘Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: Non-Hypothetical Experimental Markets’ Food Quality and Preference 15: 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, M. and Murphy, K. J. (1990) ‘Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives’ Journal of Political Economy 98: 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kachelmeier, S. J. and Shehata, M. (1992) ‘Examining Risk Preferences under High Monetary Incentives: Experimental Evidence for the People's Republic of China’ American Economic Review 82: 1120–1140.Google Scholar

Kagel, J. H. (1995) ‘Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research’ in The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E. (eds.) Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 501–585.Google Scholar

Kagel, J. H. and Levin, D. (2002) Common Value Auctions and the Winner's Curse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kagel, J. H., Harstad, R. M., and Levin, D. (1987) ‘Information Impact and Allocation Rules in Auctions with Affiliated Private Values: A Laboratory Study’ Econometrica 55: 1275–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagel, J. H. and Levin, D. (1993) ‘Independent Private Value Auctions: Bidder Behavior in First, Second-, and Third Price Auctions with Varying Numbers of Bidders’ Economic Journal 103: 868–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’ Econometrica 47: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (eds.) (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1990) ‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’ The Journal of Political Economy 98: 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kajii, A. and Morris, S. (1997) ‘The Robustness of Equilibria to Incomplete Information’ Econometrica 65: 1238–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kalaitzandonakes, N. and Bijman, J. (2003) ‘So Who's Driving Biotech Acceptance?’ Nature Biotechnology 21: 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1986) ‘Vickrey Auctions in the Theory of Expected Utility with Rank-Dependent Probabilities’ Economics Letters 20: 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1987) ‘Preference Reversals and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods’ Econometrica 55: 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassardjian, E., Gamble., J., Gunson, A., and Jaeger, S. R. (2005) ‘A New Approach to Elicit Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Genetically Modified Apples' British Food Journal 107: 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katsaras, N., P. Wolfson, J. Kinsey, and B. Senauer (2001) ‘Data Mining: A Segmentation Analysis of U.S. Grocery Shoppers’ Working Paper 01–01. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Retail Food Industry Center.

Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005) Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Killinger, K. M., Calkins, C. R.Umberger, W. J., Feuz, D. M., and Eskridge, K. M. (2004a) ‘Consumer Visual Preference and Value for Beef Steaks Differing in Marbling Level and Color’ Journal of Animal Science 82: 3288–3293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killinger, K. M., Calkins, C. R.Umberger, W. J., Feuz, D. M., and Eskridge, K. M. (2004b) ‘Consumer Sensory Acceptance and Value for Beef Steaks of Similar Tenderness, but Differing in Marbling Level’ Journal of Animal Science 82: 3294–3301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killinger, K. M., Calkins, C. R.Umberger, W. J., Feuz, D. M., and Eskridge, K. M. (2004c) ‘A Comparison of Consumer Sensory Acceptance and Value of Domestic Beef Steaks and Steaks from a Branded, Argentine Beef Program’ Journal of Animal Science 82: 3302–3307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, J. O. and Mueller, C. W. (1978) Introduction to Factor Analysis: What it is and How to Do It. University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07–013. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirby, K. N. (1997) ‘Bidding on the Future: Evidence against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, R. E. (1994) Experimental Design: Procedures for Behavioral Sciences (3rd edn.) Pacific Grove CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar

Klemperer, P. (1999) ‘Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature’ Journal of Economics Surveys 13: 227–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klemperer, P. (2004) Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kline, P. (2002) An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar

Kling, C. L., J. A. List, and J. Zhao (2003) ‘The WTP/WTA Disparity: Have we been Observing Dynamic Values but Interpreting Them as Static?’ Working Paper 03-WT 333, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, May.

Knetsch, J. L. and Sinden, J. A. (1984) ‘Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knetsch, J. L., Tang, F. F., and Thaler, R. H. (2001) ‘The Endowment Effect and Repeated Market Trials: Is the Vickrey Auction Demand Revealing?’ Experimental Economics 4: 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koenker, R. and Hallock, K. F. (2001) ‘Quantile Regression’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 15: 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978) ‘Regression Quantiles’ Econometrica 46: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolstad, C. D. and Guzman, R. M. (1999) ‘Information and the Divergence between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38: 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraemer, H. C. and Thiemann, S. (1987) How Many Subjects?Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Krishna, V. (2002) Auction Theory. Elsevier Science: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Krugman, P. (1998) ‘Two Cheers for Formalism’ Economic Journal 108: 1829–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kupper, L. L. and Hafner, K. B. (1989) ‘How Appropriate are Popular Sample Size Formulas?’ The American Statistician 43: 101–105.Google Scholar

Lange, C., Martin, C., Chabanet, C., Combris, P., and Issanchou, S. (2002) ‘Impact of the Information Provided to Consumers on their Willingness-to-Pay for Champagne: Comparison with Hedonic Scores’ Food Quality and Preference 13: 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazear, E. and Rosen, S. (1981) ‘Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimal Labor Contracts’ Journal of Political Economy 89: 841–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, J., Small, D., and Loewenstein, G. (2004) ‘Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carry-Over Effects of Emotions on Economic Transactions’ Psychological Science 15: 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitt, S. D. and J. A. List (2005) ‘What Do Laboratory Experiments Tell Us About the Real World?’ Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Chicago, September 12.

Levy, P. and Lemeshow, S. (1991) Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1971) ‘Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions’ Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, T. and Schmidt, P. (1984) ‘A Test of the Tobit Specification Against an Alternative Suggested by Cragg’ Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 174–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. (2001) ‘Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards’ American Economic Review 91: 1498–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. (2002) ‘Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The “More is Less” Phenomenon’ American Economic Review 92: 1636–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. (2003) ‘Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. (2004) ‘The Nature and Extent of Discrimination in the Marketplace: Evidence from the Field’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 119: 49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. and Gallet, C. A. (2001) ‘What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?’ Environmental and Resource Economics 20: 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. and Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000) ‘Demand Reduction in a Multi-Unit Auction: Evidence from a Sportscard Field Experiment,’ American Economic Review 90: 961–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. and Shogren, J. F. (1998) ‘Calibration of the Differences Between Actual and Hypothetical Valuations in a Field Experiment’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 37: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A. and Shogren, J. F. (1999) ‘Price Information and Bidding Behavior in Repeated Second-Price Auctions.’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 942–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List, J. A., Margolis, M., and Shogren, J. F. (1998) ‘Hypothetical-Actual Bid Calibration of a Multi-Good Auction.’ Economics Letters 60: 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenstein, G. (1988) ‘Frames of Mind in Intertemporal Choice.’ Management Science 34: 200–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lou, G. Y. (2002) ‘Collective Decision-Making and Heterogeneity in Tastes.’ Journal of Business and Economic Statistics April, Vol. 20, No. 2; pp. 213–226.Google Scholar

Loureiro, M. L., Umberger, W. J., and Hine, S. (2003) ‘Testing the Initial Endowment Effect in Experimental Auctions’ Applied Economics Letters 10: 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., and Swait, J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, R. D. (1959) Individual Choice Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Lucking-Reiley, D. (1999) ‘Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalence between Auction Formats: Magic on the Internet.’ American Economic Review 89: 1063–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000) ‘Vickrey Auctions in Practice: From Nineteenth-Century Philately to Twenty-First-Century E-Commerce’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lunander, A. and Nilsson, J. E. (2004) ‘Taking the Lab to the Field: Experimental Tests of Alternative Mechanisms to Procure Multiple Contracts’ Journal of Regulatory Economics 25: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. (2003) ‘An Experimental Test of the Commitment Cost Theory’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85: 1316–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. and Fox, J. A. (2003) ‘Value Elicitation in Laboratory and Retail Environments’ Economics Letters 79: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. and Hudson, D. (2004) ‘Effect of Monitor-Subject Cheap Talk on Ultimatum Game Offers’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 54: 439–443, July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. and Coble, C. H. (2005) ‘Risk Perceptions, Risk Preference, and Acceptance of Risky Food’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. and Norwood, B. (2005) ‘Effect of Experimental Design on Choice-Based Conjoint Valuation Estimates’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. and M. Rousu (2006) ‘Market Price Endogeneity and Accuracy of Value Elicitation Mechanisms’ Experimental Methods in Environmental and Resource EconomicList, John (ed.) Edward Elgar Publishing. forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L. and Schroeder, T. C. (2006) ‘Auction Bids and Shopping Choices’ Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L., Fox, J. A., Schroeder, T. C., Mintert, J., and Koohmaraie, M. (2001a) ‘In-Store Valuation of Steak Tenderness’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L., Daniel, M. S., Mark, D., and Lusk, C. L. (2001b) ‘Alternative Calibration and Auction Institutions for Predicting Consumer Willingness to Pay of Nongenetically Modified Corn Chips.’ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26: 40–57.Google Scholar

Lusk, J. L., Feldkamp, T., and Schroeder, T. C. (2004a) ‘Experimental Auction Procedure: Impact on Valuation of Quality Differentiated Goods’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, B., and Traill, W. B. (2004b) ‘Effect of Information about Benefits of Biotechnology on Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: Evidence from Experimental Auctions in United States, England, and France’ European Review of Agricultural Economics 31 July: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., Morrow, B., and Traill, W. B. (2005) ‘Consumer Welfare Effects of Introducing and Labeling Genetically Modified Food.’ Economics Letters 88: 382–88, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L., C. Alexander, and M. Rousu (2006a) ‘Designing Experimental Auctions for Marketing Research: Effect of Values, Distributions, and Mechanisms on Incentives for Truthful Bidding.’ Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University.

Lusk, J. L., Pruitt, J. R. and Norwood, B. (2006b) ‘External Validity of a Field Experiment’ Economics Letters 931: 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lusk, J. L., Traill, W. B., House, L. O., Valli, C., Jaeger, S. R., Moore, M., and Morrow, B. (2006c) ‘Comparative Advantage in Demand: Experimental Evidence of Preferences for Genetically Modified Food in the United States and European Union’ Journal of Agricultural Economics 57: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machina, M. J. (1982) ‘Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom’ Econometrica 50: 1089–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansfield, C. (1998) ‘A Consistent Method for Calibrating Contingent Value Survey Data’ Southern Economic Journal 64: 665–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcellino, D. (2006) ‘Valuing Farm Records’. Unpublished M. S. Thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.

Marette, S., J. Roosen, S. Blanchemanche, and P. Verger (2006) ‘Health Information and the Choice of Fish Species: An Experiment Measuring the Impact of Risk and Benefit Information’ Iowa State University, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publication 06-wp421, April.

Margolis, M. and Shogren, J. F. (2004) ‘Implementing the Efficient Auction: Initial Results from the Lab’ Economics Letters 84: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, W. A. and Sanogo, D. (2002) ‘Welfare Gains from Quality Certification of Infant Foods: Results from a Market Experiment in Mali’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84: 974–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J. (1987) ‘Auctions and Bidding’ Journal of Economic Literature 25: 699–738.Google Scholar

McClelland, G., Schulze, W. and Coursey, D. (1993) ‘Insurance for Low-Probability Hazards: A Biomodal Response to Unlikely Events’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7: 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, J. F. and Moffitt, R. A. (1980) ‘The Uses of Tobit Analysis’ Review of Economics and Statistics 62: 318–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mead, P. L., Slutsker, V., Dietz, L., McCaig, J., Bresee, C., Shapiro, P., Griffin, , and Tauxe, R. (1990) ‘Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States’ Emerging Infectious Diseases 5: 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melton, B. E., Colette, W. A., and Willham, R. L. (1994) ‘Imputing Input Characteristic Values from Optimal Commercial Breed or Variety Choice Decisions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 478–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melton, B. E., Huffman, W. E., and Shogren, J. F. (1996a) ‘Economic Values of Pork Attributes: Hedonic Price Analysis of Experimental Auction Data.’ Review of Agricultural Economics 18: 613–627.Google Scholar

Melton, B. E., Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., and Fox, J. A. (1996b) ‘Consumer Preferences for Fresh Food Items with Multiple Quality Attributes: Evidence from an Experimental Auction of Pork Chops’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 916–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menkhaus, D. J. (1992) ‘An Empirical Application of Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research’ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17: 44–55.Google Scholar

Milgrom, P. (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. J. (1982) ‘A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding’ Econometrica 50: 1089–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. and C. Plott (1985) ‘Revenue Generating Properties of Sealed-bid Auctions: An Experimental Analysis of One-price and Discriminative Auctions’ in Smith, V. L. (ed.) Research in Experimental EconomicsGreenwich, CT: JAI press, Inc, Vol 3. pp. 159–182.Google Scholar

Montgomery, D. C. (2000) Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Mowen, J. C. (2004) ‘Exploring the Trait of Competitiveness and Its Consumer Behavior Consequences’ Journal of Consumer Psychology 14: 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussa, M. and Rosen, S. (1978) ‘Monopoly and Product Quality’ Journal of Economic Theory 18: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nalley, L., D. Hudson, and G. Parkhurst (2004) ‘The Impacts of Taste, Location of Origin, and Health Information on Market Demand for Sweet Potatoes’ Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics Research Report 2004–001, July.

Neill, H., Cummings, R., Ganderton, P., Harrison, G., and McGukin, T. (1994) ‘Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments’ Land Economics 70: 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neilson, W. (1994) ‘Second Price Auctions without Expected Utility’ Journal of Economic Theory 62: 136–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nevo, A. (2001) ‘Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry’ Econometrica 69: 307–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norwood, F. B. and J. L. Lusk (2006) ‘The Dual Nature of Choice: When Personality and Choice Collide’ Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University.

Noussair, C., Plott, C. and Riezman, R. (1995) ‘An Experimental Investigation of the Patterns of International Trade’ American Economic Review 85: 462–491.Google Scholar

Noussair, C., Robin, S. and Ruffieux, B. (2002) ‘Do Consumers Not Care About Biotech Foods or Do They Just Not Read the Labels?’ Economics Letters 75: 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noussair, C., Robin, S. and Ruffieux, B. (2004a) ‘Revealing Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay: A Comparison of the BDM Mechanism and the Vickrey Auction' Journal of Economic Psychology 25: 725–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noussair, C., Robin, S. and Ruffieux, B. (2004b) ‘A Comparison of Hedonic Rating and Demand-Revealing Auctions’ Food Quality and Preference 15: 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noussair, C., Robin, S. and Ruffieux, B. (2004c) ‘Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified Food?’ The Economic Journal 114: 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric Theory 3rd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Organic Consumers Association. (2002) ‘Irradiation Home Page.’ http://organicconsumers.org/irradlink.html

Parkhurst, G., Shogren, J. F. and Dickinson, D. L. (2004) ‘Negative Values in Vickrey Auctions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pennock, D. M., Lawrence, S., Giles, C. L., and Nielsen, F. A. (2001) ‘The Real Power of Artificial Markets’ Science 291: 987–988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennings, J. M. E., Wansink, B., and Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2002) ‘A Note on Modeling Consumer Reactions to a Crisis: The Case of the Mad Cow Disease’ International Journal of Research in Marketing 19: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, M. and Reny, P. J. (2002) ‘An Efficient Auction’ Econometrica 70: 1199–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, E., Slovic, P., and Gregory, R. (2003) ‘The Role of Affect in the WTA/WTP Disparity’ Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phaneuf, D. J., Herriges, J. A., and Kling, C. L. (1998) ‘Valuing Water Quality Improvements using Revealed Preference Methods when Corner Solutions are Present’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80: 1025–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phaneuf, D. J., Herriges, J. A., and Kling, C. L. (2000) ‘Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand’ Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Platter, W. J., Tatum, J. D., Belk, K. E., Koontz, S. R., Chapman, P. L., and Smith, G. C. (2005) ‘Effects of Marbling and Shear Force on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Beef Strip Loin Steaks' Journal of Animal Science 83: 890–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Plott, C. R. (1991) ‘Will Economics Become an Experimental Science?’ Southern Economic Journal 57: 901–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, C. R. (1994) ‘Market Architectures, Institutional Landscapes and Testbed Experiments’ Economic Theory 4: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, C. R. (1996) ‘Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes’ in Arrow, K.et al. (eds.) The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior. London, Macmillan, New York: St Martin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plott, C. R. and K. Y. Chen. (2002) ‘Information Aggregation Mechanisms: Concept, Design and Implementation for a Sales Forecasting Problem’ California Institute of Technology, Social Science Working Paper 1131, March.

Plott, C. R. and Zeiler, K. (2005) ‘The Willingness to Pay – Willingness to Accept Gap, The “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations’ American Economic Review 95: 530–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pond, G. A. (1931) ‘The Place of Farm Accounting in Research’ Journal of Farm Economics 13: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, J. (1984) ‘Least Absolute Deviations Estimation for the Censored Regression Model’ Journal of Econometrics 25: 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pratt, J. W. (1964) ‘Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large’ Econometrica 32: 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quiggin, J. (1982) ‘A Theory of Anticipated Utility’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, A. (1997) ‘Calibration of CV responses: Discussion’ in Bjornstad, D. and Kahn, J. (eds.) The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources, London: Edgar Elgar, 198–207.Google Scholar

Randall, A. and Stoll, J. (1980) ‘Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space’ American Economic Review 70: 449–455.Google Scholar

Romesburg, C. (1984) Cluster Analysis for Researchers.Belmont, Calif: Lifetime Learning Publications.Google Scholar

Roosen, J., Hennessy, D. A., Fox, J. A., and Schreiber, A. (1998) ‘Consumers’ Valuation of Insecticide Use Restrictions: An Application to Apples' Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 23: 367–84.Google Scholar

Rousu, M., Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., and Tegene, A. (2004a) ‘Estimating the Public Value of Conflicting Information: The Case of Genetically Modified Foods’ Land Economics 80: 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousu, M., Huffman, W. E., Shogren, J. F., and Tegene, A. (2004b) ‘Are United States Consumers Tolerant of Genetically Modified Foods?’ Review of Agricultural Economics 26: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousu, M., Monchuk, D. C., Shogren, J. F., and Kosa, K. M. (2005) ‘Consumer Willingness to Pay for “Second-Generation” Genetically Engineered Products and the Role of Marketing Information’ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37: 647–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozan, A., Stenger, A., and Willinger, M. (2004) ‘Willingness-to-pay for Food Safety: An Experimental Investigation of Quality Certification on Bidding Behaviour’ European Review of Agricultural Economics 31: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutström, E. E. (1998). ‘Home-Grown Values and Incentive Compatible Auction Design’ International Journal of Game Theory 27: 427–441.Google Scholar

Seip, K. and Strand, J. (1992) ‘Willingness to Pay for Environmental Goods in Norway: A Contingent Valuation Study with Real Payment’ Environmental and Resource Economics 2: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Servan-Schreiber, E., Wolfers, J., Pennock, D. M., and Galebach, B. (2004) ‘Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter?’ Electronic Markets 14: 2443–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shafir, E., Diamond, P., and Tversky, A. (1997) ‘Money Illusion’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 341–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, W. D., Nayga, R. M. Jr., and Silva, A. (2006) ‘Health Benefits and Uncertainty: An Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Risk Presentation on Auction Bids for a Healthful Product’ Economics Bulletin 4: 1–8.Google Scholar

Shin, S. Y., Kliebenstein, J., Hayes, D. J., and Shogren, J. F. (1992) ‘Consumer Willingness to Pay for Safer Food Products’ Journal of Food Safety 13: 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipman, D. R. (2001) ‘Marketing of Grains in Today's Evolving Markets’ Paper presented at the meeting ‘Strategies for Coexistence of GMO, Non-GMO, and Organic Crop Production,’ Minneapolis, MN, November 28.

Shogren, J. F. (1990) ‘The Impact of Self-Protection and Self-Insurance on Individual Response to Risk’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3: 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F. (1997) ‘Self-Interest and Equity in a Bargaining Tournament with Non-Linear Payoffs’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 32: 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F. (2005) ‘Experimental Methods and Valuation’ in Handbook of Environmental Economics.Mäler, K. G. and Vincent, J., (eds.) Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Shogren, J. F. and Crocker, T. (1994) ‘Rational Risk Valuation with Sequential Reduction Opportunities’ Economics Letters 44: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. and L. Tadevosyan (2006) ‘Bidding Behavior in a Consequential Second Price Auction’ Working Paper, University of Wyoming.

Shogren, J. F., Fox, J. A., Hayes, D. J., and Kliebenstein, J. B. (1994) ‘Bid Sensitivity and the Structure of the Vickrey Auction’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 1089–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F., Shin, S. Y., Hayes, D. J., and Kliebenstein, J. B. (1994) ‘Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept’ American Economic Review 84: 255–270.Google Scholar

Shogren, J. F., Fox, J. A., Hayes, D. J., and Roosen, J. (1999) ‘Observed Choices for Food Safety in Retail, Survey, and Auction Markets’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 1192–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F., List, J. A., and Hayes, D. J. (2000) ‘Preference Learning in Consecutive Experimental Auctions’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 1016–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F., Margolis, M., Koo, C., and List, J. A. (2001a) ‘A Random nth-Price Auction’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F., Cho, S., Koo, C., List, J., Park, C., Polo, P., and Wilhelmi, R. (2001b) ‘Auction Mechanisms and the Measurement of WTP and WTA’ Resource and Energy Economics 23: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F., Parkhurst, G. M., and McIntosh, C. (2006) ‘Second-Price Auction Tournament’ Economics Letters 92: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slovic, P. (1991) ‘The Construction of Preferences’ American Psychologist 50: 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, B. J. and R. H. Warland (1992) ‘Consumer Responses to Milk from rbST-Supplemented Cows’ Bovine Somatotropin and Emerging Issues: An Assessment, Milton, C. Hallberg, (ed.) Westview Special Studies in Agriculture Science and Policy, Westview Press.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. (1976) ‘Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory’ American Economic Review 66: 274–280.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. (1980) ‘Experiments with a Decentralized Mechanism for Public Good Decisions’ American Economic Review 70: 584–599.Google Scholar

Smith, V. L. (1982) ‘Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science’ American Economic Review 72: 923–955.Google Scholar

Smith, V. K. and Mansfield, C. (1998) ‘Buying Time: Real and Hypothetical Offers’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36: 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soler, F. and Sánchez, G. J. M. (2002) ‘Consumers’ Acceptability of Organic Food in Spain: Results from an Experimental Auction Market' British Food Journal 104: 670–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solnick, S. and Hemenway, D. (1996) ‘The Deadweight Loss of Christmas: Comment’ American Economic Review 86: 1299–1305.Google Scholar

Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., and Strappazzon, L. (2003) ‘Auctions for Conservation Contracts: An Empirical Examination of Victoria's BushTender Trial’ Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47: 477–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swallow, S. (1994) ‘Value Elicitation in Laboratory Markets: Discussion and Applicability to Contingent Valuation’ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 1096–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. (1980) ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. and Thaler, R. H. (1990) ‘Anomalies: Preference Reversals’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992) ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. and Simonson, I. (1993) ‘Context-dependent Preferences’ Management Science 39: 1179–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A. and Fox, C. R. (1995) ‘Weighting Risk and Uncertainty’ Psychological Review 102: 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, A., Slovic, P., and Kahneman, D. (1990) ‘The Causes of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon’ American Economic Review 80: 204–217.Google Scholar

Umberger, W. J. and Feuz, D. M. (2004) ‘The Usefulness of Experimental Auctions in Determining Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Quality Differentiated Products' Review of Agricultural Economics 26: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umberger, W. J., Feuz, D. M., Calkins, C. R., and Killinger-Mann, K. (2002) ‘U.S. Consumer Preference and Willingness-to-Pay for Domestic Corn-Fed Beef versus International Grass-Fed Beef Measured Through an Experimental Auction’ Agribusiness: An International Journal 18: 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umberger, W. J., Feuz, D. M., Calkins, C. R., and Sitz, B. M. (2003) ‘Country-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products: U.S. Consumers’ Perceptions' Journal of Food Distribution Research 34: 103–116.Google Scholar

U.S. Bureau of the Census. ‘U.S. Census Bureau.’ <http://www.census.gov/>

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (1999) Progress and Perspective Food Safety Initiative FY Annual Report.

U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Acreage (2005) June 30.

Van Ravenswaay, E. O. (1988) ‘How Much Food Safety Do Consumers Want? An Analysis of Current Studies and Strategies for Future Research’ in Demands in the Marketplace: Public Policy in Relation to Food Safety, Quality and Human Health, Katherine, L. Clancy, (ed.) Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar

Vickrey, W. (1961) ‘Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders’ Journal of Finance 16 March: 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vickrey, W. (1962) ‘Auctions and Bidding Gamess’ Recent Advances in Game Theory. Papers Delivered at a Meeting of the Princeton University Conference, October [sic] 4–6, 1961, Princeton University Conference, pp. 15–29.

Viscusi, W. K. (1989) ‘Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of the Paradoxes’ Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., and Huber, J. (1987) ‘An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks’ RAND Journal of Economics 18: 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldfogel, J. (1993) ‘The Deadweight Loss of Christmas’ American Economic Review 83: 1328–1336.Google Scholar

Waldfogel, J. (1996) ‘The Deadweight Loss of Christmas: Reply’ American Economic Review 86: 1306–1308.Google Scholar

Wertenbroch, K., and Skiera, B. (2002) ‘Measuring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase' Journal of Marketing Research 39: 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, T. D. and Schooler, J. W. (1991) ‘Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, T. D. and LaFleur, S. J. (1995) ‘Knowing What You'll Do: Effects of Analyzing Reasons on Self-Prediction’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolfers, J. and Zitzewitz, E. (2004) ‘Prediction Markets’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 18: 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodland, B. M. and Woodland, L. M. (1999) ‘Expected Utility, Skewness, and the Baseball Betting Market’ Applied Economics 31: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Health Organization (2000) Food Safety – A Worldwide Public Health Issue (http://www.who.int/fsf/fctshtfs.htm#Recognition of food safety at international level).

Zhao, J. and Kling, C. L. (2001) ‘A New Explanation for the WTP/WTA Disparity’ Economics Letters 73: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhao, J. and Kling, C. L. (2004) ‘Willingness-to-Pay, Compensating Variation, and the Cost of Commitment’ Economic Inquiry 42: 503–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar