Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- 1 Introduction: Experiments in Public Management Research
- 2 A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies in Public Management Journals
- 3 Experiments and the Classical Roots of Public Administration: Comments on the Potential Utility of Experiments for Contemporary Public Management
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
2 - A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies in Public Management Journals
from Part I - Context
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Book contents
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Experiments in Public Management Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- Part I Context
- 1 Introduction: Experiments in Public Management Research
- 2 A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies in Public Management Journals
- 3 Experiments and the Classical Roots of Public Administration: Comments on the Potential Utility of Experiments for Contemporary Public Management
- Part II Methods
- Part III Substantive Contributions
- Part IV Issues and Implications
- Appendix Recommended Reporting Guidelines for Experiments in Public Management, a Checklist1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiments in Public Management ResearchChallenges and Contributions, pp. 20 - 36Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Anderson, D. M. and Edwards, B. C. 2015. ‘Unfulfilled promise: laboratory experiments in public management research’, Public Management Review, 17(10), pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avellaneda, C. N. 2013. ‘Mayoral decision-making: issue salience, decision context, and choice constraint? An experimental study with 120 Latin American mayors’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), pp. 631–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bækgaard, M. 2011. ‘The impact of formal organizational structure on politico-administrative interaction: evidence from a natural experiment’, Public Administration, 89(3), pp. 1063–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellé, N. 2014. ‘Leading to make a difference: a field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation’, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 24(1), pp. 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellé, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review, 75(2), pp. 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, Y., Gørtz, M. and Pedersen, L. H. 2015. ‘The causal effect of profound organizational change when job insecurity is low – a quasi-experiment analyzing municipal mergers’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), pp. 1185–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwman, R. and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. 2016. ‘Experimental public administration from 1992 to 2014: a systematic literature review and ways forward’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(2), pp. 110–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. 1992. ‘Experimental design in public policy and management research: introduction’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(4), pp. 440–2.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Scott, P. 1992. ‘Laboratory experiments in public policy and management’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3), pp. 293–313.Google Scholar
Chalkley, M. et al. 2010. ‘Incentives for dentists in public service: evidence from a natural experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(s2), pp. i207–i223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J. C. and Radaelli, C. M. 2015. ‘Regulators and reform: a quasi-experimental assessment of the effects of training inspectors’, International Public Management Journal, 18(2), pp. 304–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteve, M., Urbig, D., Van Witteloostuijn, A., and Boyne, G. 2016. ‘Prosocial behavior and public service motivation’, Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp. 177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, P. et al., 2010. ‘Enterprise liability, risk pooling, and diagnostic care’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(s2), pp. i225–i242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fine Licht, J. 2014. ‘Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: an experiment’, Public Administration Review, 74(3), pp. 361–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fine Licht, J. et al. 2014. ‘When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship’, Governance, 27(1), pp. 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, H. P. et al. 2003. ‘Polling and policy analysis as resources for advocacy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), pp. 177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2012. ‘Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), pp. 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. et al. 2013. ‘The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross-national comparative experiment’, Public Administration Review, 73(4), pp. 575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Klijn, A. 2015. ‘The effects of judicial transparency on public trust: evidence from a field experiment’, Public Administration, 93(4), pp. 995–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Meijer, A. J. 2014. ‘Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), pp. 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2011a. ‘Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government’, Public Administration, 89(4), pp. 1419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2011b. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), pp. 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and Moseley, A. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perception, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’, Public Administration, 92(2), pp. 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S., Van de Walle, S. and Kim, S. 2016. ‘Generating usable knowledge through an experimental approach to public administration’, Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp. 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. H. and Kim, S. 2016. ‘National culture and social desirability bias in measuring public service motivation’, Administration & Society, 48(4), pp. 444–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, J. H., Miller, G. J. and Verkuilen, J. 2003. ‘Adaptive incrementalism and complexity: experiments with two-person cooperative signaling games’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), pp. 341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachapelle, E., Montpetit, É. and Gauvin, J. 2014. ‘Public perceptions of expert credibility on policy issues: the role of expert framing and political worldviews’, Policy Studies Journal, 42(4), pp. 674–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsbergen, D. et al. 1997. ‘Decision quality, confidence, and commitment with expert systems: an experimental study’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), pp. 131–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsbergen, D., Bozeman, B. and Bretschneider, S. 1992. ‘“Internal rationality” and the effects of perceived decision difficulty: results of a public management decisionmaking experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3), pp. 247–64.Google Scholar
Lawrence, E., Stoker, R. and Wolman, H. 2013. ‘The effects of beneficiary targeting on public support for social policies’, Policy Studies Journal, 41(2), pp. 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, H. Z. 2011. ‘Experiments for public management research’, Public Management Review, 13(2), pp. 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutt, P. C. 2006. ‘Comparing public and private sector decision-making practices’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), pp. 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G. and Lavena, C. F. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy in policing: does it increase perceived legitimacy?’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), pp. 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G. and Li, H. 2016. ‘Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: an experimental study’, Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp. 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, P. G. 1997. ‘Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion: an experiment in street-level decision making’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurmaier, K. 1992. ‘Budgetary decisionmaking in central budget bureaus: an experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(4), pp. 463–87.Google Scholar
Van De Walle, S. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2011. ‘The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: lessons from a split-ballot experiment’, Public Administration, 89(4), pp. 1436–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmer, D. 1992. ‘Ethical sensitivity and managerial decisionmaking: an experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(4), pp. 443–62.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, A. et al. 2015. ‘The impacts of different regulatory regimes on the effectiveness of public procurement’, International Journal of Public Administration, 38(11), pp. 796–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21
- Cited by