Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T13:01:19.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Compulsory Heirship in Roman Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2012

Reinhard Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
Kenneth Reid
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Reinhard Zimmermann
Affiliation:
University of Regensburg
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

All modern legal systems in Europe attempt to balance the moral precept of family solidarity with the principle of freedom of testation. But they do so in different ways. In German law, for example, the closest relatives are given the right to claim a “compulsory portion” (Pflichtteil) of the estate. The idea of a certain part of the estate having to go to the deceased's closest relatives even against his wishes dates back to Roman law. Down to the end of the nineteenth century, the Roman rules were still applicable in those parts of Germany that were governed by the ius commune. They were modified and rationalised by the draftsmen of the German Civil Code of 1900 (BGB), but the general idea on which they were based remained unaffected. The formulation provided by the BGB was not uncontroversial, either then or later. Predominantly, however, it has been and remains accepted. Today, the indefeasible claim of the closest relatives to a share of the estate is, like the principle of freedom of testation, widely taken to be guaranteed by art 1411 of the German Constitution (“Property and the right of inheritance are guaranteed”).

The present chapter provides an overview of the development of the idea of a right to obtain part of the estate even contrary to the will of the testator. It deserves our attention not only because it is the historical root of the compulsory portion of modern law, but also as a relatively well-documented example of the struggle to find reasonable solutions within the area of tension created by the two principles mentioned above.

Type
Chapter
Information
Exploring the Law of Succession
Studies National Historical and Comparative
, pp. 27 - 48
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×