‘A case of clairvoyance.’ Hull Packet and East Riding Times, 26 April (1844), 2.

Advert in Times, 24 March (1845) (Purland Papers).

A Lover of Truth. ‘Mesmerism.’ Manchester Times and Gazette, 20 April (1844), 2.

‘A master of arts.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 171.

‘A memoir of Charles Mayne Young.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1871), 414.

‘A painful controversy.’ Spiritual Magazine, 9 (1874), 280–1.

‘A séance with Baron and Mlle Guldenstubbe by Wm Tebb.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1867), 324–5.

‘A séance with Miss Cook.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1873), 555.

‘A séance with Mr Foster.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1871), 66–70.

A Surgeon, ‘To the editor of the Maidstone Journal.’ Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser, 3 January (1843) (Purland Papers).

An Enquirer, ‘The Mysterious Lady.’ Medical Times, 12 (1845), 150.

Alcock, J.Parapsychology: Science or Magic?Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Alcock, J. ‘The belief engine.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 19:3 (1995), 14–18.Google Scholar

Alcock, J. ‘The psychology of transcendence.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 6:4 (1982), 57–8.Google Scholar

Alcock, J. and Otis, L. ‘Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal.’ Psychological Reports, 46 (1980), 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, P. P.Spiritualism: a Narrative with a Discussion. Edinburgh, 1871.Google Scholar

Alvarado, C. ‘Historical perspectives in parapsychology: some practical considerations.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 51, 265–71.

‘Am I a spiritualist?’ Human Nature, 7 (1873), 161–74.

Anderson, J. H. ‘Letter.’ Morning Advertiser, 20 October 1855, 3.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. H.The Magic of Spirit-rapping. London, n.d.

‘Animal magnetism.’ Athenaeum, 555 (1838), 417–21.

‘Animal magnetism.’ Lancet, 30 (1838), 282–8.

‘Animal magnetism.’ Times, 26 January 1844, 5.

‘Animal magnetism: conclusion of second report of facts and experiments.’ Lancet, 30 (1838), 401–3.

‘Animal magnetism and homeopathy by Edwin Lee, MRCS.’ Monthly Review, 2 (1838), 471–90.

‘Animal magnetism, or mesmerism’. Lancet, 30 (1838), 805–13.CrossRef

Annemann, T. ‘Was Prof. J. B. Rhine hoodwinked?’ Jinx, 47 (1938), 329–33.Google Scholar

Anon. Table-turning by Animal Magnetism Demonstrated. London: author, 1853.Google Scholar

‘Anti-mesmerism.’ Bristol Mercury, 25 January 1845, 4.

‘Anti-mesmerism.’ Bristol Mercury, 8 February 1845, 8.

Asprem, E. ‘A nice arrangement of heterodoxies: William McDougall and the professionalization of psychical research.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 46 (2010), 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Mrs E. Fraud, Fancy, Fact: Which Is It? An Enquiry into the Mystery of Spiritualism, with a Narrative of Personal Experience. London: author, 1862.Google Scholar

Barge, T. ‘Letter’, Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 266.Google Scholar

Barnes, B., Bloor, D. and Henry, J.Scientific Knowledge: a Sociological Analysis. London: Athlone, 1996.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. ‘Mind-reading versus muscle-reading.’ Nature, 24 (1881), 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, W. F., Gurney, E. and Myers, F. W. H. ‘Report of the committee on thought-reading.’ Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 1(1), 1882, 13–34.

Barrow, L.Independent Spirits: Spiritualism and English Plebeians, 1850–1910. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, R. ‘Collective delusions: a skeptic's guide.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 21:3 (1997), 29–33.Google Scholar

Bauer, E. ‘Criticism and controversy in parapsychology – an overview.’ European Journal of Parapsychology, 5 (1984), 141–66.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. 1992. Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Beard, George M. ‘The physiology of mind-reading.’ Popular Science Monthly, 10 (1877), 459–73.Google Scholar

Beattie, J. ‘A critique and protest.’ Spiritual Magazine, 5 (1877), 552–4.Google Scholar

Bell, R. ‘Stranger than fiction’, Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 211–24.Google Scholar

Beloff, J. ‘Lessons of history.’ Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 88 (1994), 7–22.Google Scholar

Beloff, J. ‘Once a cheat, always a cheat? Eusapia Palladino revisited.’ Proceedings of the 34th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, 1991, 35–45.Google Scholar

Beloff, J.Parapsychology: a Concise History. London: Athlone, 1993.Google Scholar

Bem, D. ‘Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (2011), 407–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benassi, V. ‘Psychology of the extraordinary’, Skeptical Inquirer, 7:3 (1983), 63–5.Google Scholar

Bennet, J. H.The Mesmeric Mania of 1851, with a Physiological Explanation of the Phenomena Produced. Edinburgh: Sutherland and Knox, 1851.Google Scholar

‘Beulah no marvel, says Munsterberg.’ New York Times, 23 April 1913, available at (accessed 15 September 2012).

Beyerstein, B. ‘Why bogus therapies seem to work.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 21 (1997), 29–34.Google Scholar

Billig, M.Arguing and Thinking. Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Blackmore, S. ‘Into the unknown.’ New Scientist, 2263 (2000), 55.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. ‘Relativism at 30,000 feet’. In Mazzotti, M., ed., Knowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the Sociology of Barry Barnes. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2008, 13–34.Google Scholar

Bodie, W.Hypnotism. Macduff: Author, 1912.Google Scholar

Bodie, W.The Bodie Book. London: Coxton Press, 1906.Google Scholar

Bok, B. J. and Jerome, L. E.Objections to Astrology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1975.Google Scholar

‘Books received for review.’ Lancet, 46 (1845), 577.

Boring, E.A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Century, 1929.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. ‘Introduction.’ In Hansel, ESP: a Scientific Evaluation, xiii–xxi.

Braid, J. ‘Letter’ to The Critic, c. 8 June 1845 (Purland Papers).Google Scholar

Braid, J.Neurypnology, or the Rationale of Nervous Sleep Considered in Relation to Mesmerism. London: John Churchill, 1843.Google Scholar

Brancker, A. ‘Letter.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 431.Google Scholar

Braude, A.Radical Spirits: Spiritualism and Women's Rights in Nineteenth Century America. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Braude, S.The Limits of Influence: Psychokinesis and the Philosophy of Science. Lanham, NY: University Press of America, 1997.Google Scholar

Brevior, T. ‘What is religion?’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1866), 122–7.Google Scholar

Brewster, D.Letters on Natural Magic. London: John Murray, 1832.Google Scholar

Britland, D. ‘Psychic or magic: what's paranormal?’ Magic, 9 (1998), 50–5.Google Scholar

Broughton, R.Parapsychology: the Controversial Science. New York: Ballantine Books, 1991.Google Scholar

Brown, D.Trick of the Mind. London: Channel 4 Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Brugger, P. ‘Functional hemispheric asymmetry and belief in ESP: towards a “neuropsychology of belief”.’ Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77 (1993), 1299–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brugger, P. and Mohr, C. ‘The paranormal mind: how the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience.’ Cortex, 44 (2008), 1291–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D. and Niederberger, J. ‘“Meaningful” patterns in visual noise: effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP.’ Psychopathology, 26 (1993), 261–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bucknill, J. C. and Tuke, D. H.A Manual of Psychological Medicine: Containing the History, Nosology, Description, Statistics, Diagnosis, Pathology and Treatment of Insanity. London: John Churchill, 1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunn, G., Lovie, A., and Richards, G.Psychology in Britain: Historical Essays and Personal Reflections. Leicester: BPS Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Burns, R. M.The Great Debate on Miracles: from Joseph Glanvill to David Hume. London: Associated University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Cannon, W. ‘The problem of miracles in the 1830's.’ Victorian Studies, 4:1 (1960), 5–32.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘Fallacies of testimony in relation to the supernatural.’ Contemporary Review, 27 (1876), 279–95.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘Mesmerism, odylism, table-turning and spiritualism, considered historically and scientifically.’ Fraser's Magazine, 15 (1877), 382–405.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘On the influence of suggestion in modifying and directing muscular movement, independently of volition.’ Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 1 (1852), 147–53.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘On the psychology of belief.’ Contemporary Review, 23 (1873), 123–45.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘Psychological curiosities of spiritualism.’ Fraser's Magazine, 16 (1877), 541–64.Google Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘Re- W. I. Bishop.’ Nature, 24 (1881), 188–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, W. B. ‘Spiritualism and its recent converts.’ Quarterly Review, 131 (1871), 301–53.Google Scholar

Carrington, H.The Physical Phenomena of Spiritualism: Fraudulent and Genuine. Boston: Herbert T. Turner, 1907.Google Scholar

Carroll, B. E.Spiritualism in Antebellum America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P.Language, Thought and Consciousness: an Essay in Philosophical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, J. ‘Mrs Piper the medium.’ Science, 7 (1898), 534–5.Google Scholar

Cerullo, J. J.The Secularization of the Soul. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar

Chambers, R.On Testimony: Its Posture in the Scientific World. London, 1859.Google Scholar

Charvet, D.Alexander: the Man Who Knows. Pasadena, CA: Mike Caveney's Magic Words, 2004.Google Scholar

‘Cheating mediums.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1862), 273.

Christopher, M.Panorama of Magic. New York: Dover Publications, 1962.Google Scholar

‘Clairvoyance extraordinary.’ Manchester Times and Gazette, 11 May 1844, 5.

Clark, A.Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coelho, C. ‘Constructing parapsychology: a discourse analysis of accounts of experimental parapsychologists.’ Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Edinburgh, 2005.

Coleman, B.‘Letter.’The Spiritualist, 2 (1871), 13.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. ‘Passing events.’ Spiritual Magazine, 5 (1864), 164–70.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. ‘Spiritualism in America.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 294.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. ‘Spiritualism in America II.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 341–3.Google Scholar

Coleman, B. ‘The question of cui bono answered.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 142–3.Google Scholar

Collins, H.Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar

Collins, H. and Pinch, T.Frames of Meaning: the Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982.Google Scholar

Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1979). ‘The construction of the paranormal: nothing unscientific is happening.’ In Wallis, R., ed., On the Margins of Science, 237–70.CrossRef

Colquhoun, J. C.Reports of the Experiments on Animal Magnetism. Edinburgh: Robert Caddell, 1833.Google Scholar

Conklin, E. S. ‘Superstitious belief and practice among college students.’ American Journal of Psychology, 30 (1919), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, J.The Arts of Deception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Coon, D. ‘Testing the limits of sense and science: American experimental psychologists combat spiritualism.’ American Psychologist, 47 (1992), 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooter, R.The Cultural Meaning of Popular Science: Phrenology and the Organization of Consent in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Cormack, R. H. ‘Skepticism in introductory psychology texts’. Skeptical Inquirer, 15 (1991), 302–7.Google Scholar

Cottom, D.The Abyss of Reason: Cultural Movements, Revelations and Betrayals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Couttie, B.Forbidden Knowledge: the Paranormal Paradox. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cox, S. ‘The province of psychology.’ Proceedings of the Psychological Society of Great Britain, 1875–1879. London: privately printed, 1880, 1–37.Google Scholar

Cox, W. E. ‘Parapsychology and magicians.’ Parapsychology Review, 5:3 (1974), 12–14.Google Scholar

Crabtree, A.From Mesmer to Freud: Magnetic Sleep and the Roots of Psychological Healing. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Crawford, W. J.The Reality of Psychic Phenomena. London: John M. Watkins, 1916.Google Scholar

Crookes, W.Researches in the Phenomena of Spiritualism. London: J. Burns, 1874.Google Scholar

Crosland, N.Apparitions. London: Effingham Willson & Bosworth & Harrison, 1856.Google Scholar

‘Curious case of assault.’ Morning Chronicle, 15 April 1833, 4.

D.E.L.E. ‘Dr Forbes the real impostor.’ Zoist, 3 (1846), 537–43.Google Scholar

Danziger, K.Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, K.Marking the Mind: A History of Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, K.Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found Its Language. London: Sage Publications, 1997.Google Scholar

Danziger, K. ‘Prospects of a historical psychology.’ History and Philosophy of Psychology Bulletin, 15 (2003), 4–10.Google Scholar

Darnton, R.Mesmerism and the End of the Enlightenment in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Daston, L. ‘Marvelous facts and miraculous evidence in early modern Europe.’ Critical Inquiry, 18 (1991), 93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, O.The Haunted: a Social History of Ghosts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, E.The Great Illusionists. Secaucus, NJ: Chartwell Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R.River Out of Eden: a Darwinian View of Life. New York: Basic Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Dear, P. ‘Miracles, experiments and the ordinary course of nature.’ Isis, 81 (1990), 663–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Debate on modern spiritualism – Bradlaugh v Burns.’ Medium and Daybreak, 3 (1872), 512–17.

Dennet, D. ‘Two contrasts: folk craft versus folk science, and belief versus opinion.’ In Greenwood, J. D., ed., The Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionality and Cognitive Science, 1991, 135–48.

Derksen, M. ‘Are we not experimenting then? The rhetorical demarcation of psychology and common sense.’ Theory and Psychology, 7 (1997), 435–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwall, E. J., ed. Abnormal Hypnotic Phenomena: a Survey of Nineteenth Century Cases. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1968.Google Scholar

Dixon, T.From Passions to Emotions: the Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, A. C.The Edge of the Unknown. London: John Murray, 1930.Google Scholar

Doyle, A. C.The History of Spiritualism, 2 vols. London: Catell and Co. Ltd, 1926.Google Scholar

‘Dr A. Wood on electro-biology.’ Monthly Journal of Medical Science, 3 (1851), 407–35.

‘Dr Gully's facts.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 63–4.

‘Dr Hooker and Wallace.’ Spiritual Magazine 3 (1868), 480.

Dresslar, F. B. ‘Suggestions on the psychology of superstition.’ American Journal of Insanity, 67 (1910), 213.Google Scholar

Dresslar, F. B.Superstition and Education. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Dunninger, J.The Art of Thought Reading. Evanston, IL: Clark Publishing Company, 1962.Google Scholar

During, S.Modern Enchantments: the Cultural Power of Secular Magic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

, E. O. ‘Misdirection and the miraculous.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1949), 244–5.Google Scholar

, E. O. ‘The Piddingtons.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1949), 116–19.Google Scholar

‘Editorial introduction.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 1 (1937), 1–9.

‘Editor's notes.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1949), 18.

Edwards, D.Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar

Edwards, D. and Potter, J.Discursive Psychology. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar

Edwards, D., Potter, J. and Ashmore, M. ‘Death and furniture: the rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism.’ History of the Human Sciences, 8 (1995), 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Elegant extracts.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 433–41.

Ellenberger, H. The Discovery of the Unconscious: the History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry. New York: Basic Books, 1970.

Elliotson, J. ‘Cure of uterine disease with mesmerism, by Mr Vernon.’ Zoist, 3 (1845), 82–6.Google Scholar

Emme, E. E. ‘Modification and origin of certain beliefs in superstition among 96 college students.’ Journal of Psychology, 10 (1940), 279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ernst, W. ‘Colonial psychiatry, magic and religion: the case of mesmerism in British India.’ History of Psychiatry, 15 (2004), 57–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Esler, J. A. ‘The Piddingtons.’ Magic Circular, 43 (1948), 253–4.Google Scholar

‘Evenings with Miss Nicholl.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1867), 255.

‘Exeter.’ Phrenological Journal, 14 (1841), 102–3.

‘Experimental investigation of table-moving.’ Athenaeum, 2 July 1853, 801–3.

‘Experiments performed on Elizabeth and Jane O’Key at the house of Mr Wakley, Bedford Square in August 1838.’ Lancet, 36 (1841), 694–9.

‘Extraction of teeth in the mesmeric state.’ Zoist, 3 (1845), 214–16.

‘Extraordinary uproar: lecture on mesmerism.’ Northern Star and Leeds Advertiser, 13 January 1844, 2.

Falk, R. ‘On coincidences’, Skeptical Inquirer, 6:2 (1981), 18–31.Google Scholar

‘Farther facts by Dr Blank.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 342.

Ferriar, J.An Essay Towards a Theory of Apparitions. London: Cadell and Davies, 1813.Google Scholar

Flourens, P.Phrenology Examined. Philadelphia: Hogan and Thompson, 1846.Google Scholar

Fontes da Costa, P. ‘The making of extraordinary facts: authentication of singularities of nature at the Royal Society of London in the first half of the eighteenth century.’ Studies of History and Philosophy of Science, 33 (2002), 265–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forbes, J.Illustrations of Modern Mesmerism from Personal Investigation. London: John Churchill, 1845.Google Scholar

Forbes, J. ‘Notes of a few more trials with the mesmerists in a second search for clairvoyance.’ Medical Gazette, 35 (1845), 486–95.Google Scholar

Forbes, J. ‘Notes of yet another trial with the mesmerists.’ Medical Gazette, 35 (1845), 669–75.Google Scholar

Frazier, K. ‘CSICOP's London conference: musings, thoughts and themes.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 10:2 (1986), 100.Google Scholar

Frazier, K. ‘From psychics and ESP beliefs to UFOs and quacks: highlights of CSICOP's first international conference.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 8 (1984), 194–202.Google Scholar

Frazier, K.Paranormal Borderlands of Science. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1981.Google Scholar

Frazier, K. ‘Scientific facts and fictions: on the trail of paranormal beliefs at CSICOP “84”.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 9 (1985), 197–201.Google Scholar

Frazier, K. ‘Something for everyone at world skeptics congress.’ 20:5 (1996), 5.

French, C., Fowler, M., McCarthy, K. and Peers, D. ‘Belief in astrology: a test of the Barnum effect.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 15 (1991), 166–72.Google Scholar

Frost, T.The Lives of the Conjurors. London: Tinsley Brothers, 1876.Google Scholar

Fuller, U.Confessions of a Psychic. Teaneck, NJ: Karl Fulves, 1975.Google Scholar

Gardner, M. ‘Science and parapsychology’, Skeptical Inquirer, 4:3 (1980), 60–3.Google Scholar

Gauld, A.A History of Hypnotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Gauld, A.The Founders of Psychical Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1968.Google Scholar

Genoni, T. ‘Exploring mind, memory and the psychology of belief.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 19:1 (1995), 10–13.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. ‘Social psychology as history.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26 (1973), 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gieryn, T. ‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.’ American Sociological Review, 48 (1983), 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, N. and Mulkay, M.Opening Pandora's Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gilliland, A. R. ‘A study of the superstitions of college students.’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24 (1930), 472–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilovich, T.How We Know What Isn't So: the Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gilovich, T. and Savitsky, K. ‘Like goes with like: the role of representativeness in erroneous and pseudoscientific beliefs.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 20:2 (1996), 34–40.Google Scholar

Godfrey, N. S.Table-moving Tested, and Proved to Be the Result of Satanic Agency. London: author, 1853.Google Scholar

Goffman, E.Frame Analysis: an Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Row, 1974.Google Scholar

Goodall, J.Performance and Evolution in the Age of Darwin: Out of the Natural Order. London: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Mrs M. M.The Home Life of Sir David Brewster. Edinburgh: Edmonston and Douglas, 1870.Google Scholar

Goulding, A. and Parker, A. ‘Finding psi in the paranormal: psychometric measures used in research on paranormal beliefs/experiences and in research on psi-ability.’ European Journal of Parapsychology, 16 (2001), 73–101.Google Scholar

Graumann, C. F. and Gergen, K.Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, T. ‘University course reduces belief in paranormal.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 8:3 (1984), 247–51.Google Scholar

Gregory, W.Letters to a Candid Enquirer on Animal Magnetism. London: Taylor, Walton and Maberly, 1851.Google Scholar

‘Greenwich lecture hall’, newspaper clipping, 2 February 1844 (Purland Papers).

Guppy, S. ‘Letter.’ The Spiritualist, 1 (1871), 222.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. ‘Making up people.’ In Heller, T. C, Sosna, M. and Wellbery, D. E., eds., Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the Self in Western Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986, 222–36.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. ‘The looping effects of human kinds.’ In D. Sperber, D. Premack and Premack, A., eds., Causal Cognition: a Multidisciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, 351–94.Google Scholar

Hacking, I.Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hall, S. C.The Use of Spiritualism. London: E. W. Allen, 1884.Google Scholar

Hankins, T. and Silverman, R.Instruments and the Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hansel, C. E. M.ESP: A Critical Re-evaluation. Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1980.Google Scholar

Hansel, C. E. M.ESP: A Scientific Evaluation. London: MacGibbon and Kee Ltd, 1966.Google Scholar

Hansen, G. P. ‘CSICOP and skepticism: an emerging social movement.’ Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association, 1987, 318–31.Google Scholar

Hansen, G. P. ‘Magicians who endorsed psychic phenomena.’ Linking Ring, 70:8 (1990), 65, 109.Google Scholar

Hansen, G. P.The Trickster and the Paranormal. Xlibris: New York, 2001.Google Scholar

Harre, R. and Gillett, G.The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 1994.Google Scholar

Harris, P.The Art of Astonishment: Pieces of Strange to Unleash the Moment. Book 1. Sacramento, CA: A-1 Multimedia.

Hearnshaw, L. S.A Short History of British Psychology, 1840–1940. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1964.Google Scholar

Hergovich, A. ‘The effect of pseudo-psychic demonstrations as dependent on belief in paranormal phenomena and suggestibility.’ Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (2004), 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Hertford winter assizes.’ Jackson's Oxford Journal, 3 December 1831.

Hess, D. J.Science in the New Age: the Paranormal, its Defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hibbert, S.Sketches of the Philosophy of Apparitions. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1825.Google Scholar

Hill, A.Paranormal Media: Audiences, Spirits and Magic in Popular Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Holmes, G. ‘Case of cross-mesmerism.’ People's Phrenological Journal, 2 (1844), 138–40.Google Scholar

Home, Mme. D. D. Home: His Life and Mission. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1921.Google Scholar

Home, D. D., Incidents in My Life. Secaucus, NJ: University Books, 1972 (originally published 1863).Google Scholar

Honestas. ‘Letter.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1868), 216–19.Google Scholar

Hopkins, A.Magic: Stage Illusions and Scientific Diversions, Including Trick Photography. New York: Munn & Co., 1898.Google Scholar

Horton, S. ‘Were they having fun yet? Victorian optical gadgetry, modernist selves.’ In Christ, C. and Jordan, J., eds., Victorian Literature and the Visual Imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Houdini, H.The Unmasking of Robert-Houdin. New York: Publishers Printing Co., 1908.Google Scholar

Howitt, W. ‘Correspondence.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1862), 43.Google Scholar

Howitt, W. ‘Darkness as an element of power in the divine economy?’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 340.Google Scholar

Hutchison, J. ‘Important testimony to the facts.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1861), 89–90.Google Scholar

Hyman, R. ‘A critical overview of parapsychology.’ In Kurtz, A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology, 3–96.

Hyman, R. ‘The Geller papers.’ Zetetic, 1 (1976), 73–80.Google Scholar

Hyman, R. ‘The psychology of the psychic.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 5:2 (1980), 60–3.Google Scholar

Hytche, E. ‘The impostors who are exhibited in public by the professors of mesmerism.’ Lancet, 43 (1844), 576–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Illusions and hallucinations.’ British Quarterly Review, 36 (1862), 387–418.

‘Illustrations of modern mesmerism.’ British and Foreign Medical Review, 19 (1845), 277–8.

‘Illustrations of modern mesmerism from personal investigations, by John Forbes’. British and Foreign Medical Review, 20 (1846), 277–8.

‘Incidents in my life.’ Times, 9 April 1863, 4–5.

‘Intelligence.’ Phrenological Journal 14 (1841), 197–8, 287, 290.

‘Intelligence.’ Phrenological Journal 17 (1844), 307.

‘Investigating the paranormal.’ Nature, 251 (1974), 559–60.

Irwin, H. ‘Belief in the paranormal: a review of the empirical literature.’ Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 87 (1993), 1–39.Google Scholar

Irwin, H. ‘On paranormal disbelief: the psychology of the sceptic.’ In Zollschan, G., Schumaker, J. and Walsh, G., eds., Exploring the Paranormal: Perspectives on Belief and Experience. Bridport: Prism Press, 1989, 306–12.Google Scholar

Irwin, H.The Psychology of Paranormal Belief. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire, 2009.Google Scholar

Irwin, H. and Watt, C.An Introduction to Parapsychology. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2007.Google Scholar

J. ‘Letter.’ Morning Advertiser, 23 October 1855, 3.

J. ‘Letter.’ Morning Advertiser, 27 October 1855, 5.

J. J. S. ‘Letter.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 233.

James, W. ‘Address by the president before the Society of Psychical Research’. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 12 (1896), 2–10.Google Scholar

James, W. ‘Lehmann and Hansen on the telepathic problem.’ Science, 8 (1898), 956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. ‘Messrs Lehmann and Hansen on telepathy.’ Science, 9 (1899), 654–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. ‘Mrs Piper the medium.’ Science, 7 (1898), 640–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

James, W.Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt, 1890.Google Scholar

James, W. ‘Psychical research.’ Proceedings of the Psychological Society of Great Britain, 1875–1879. London: privately printed 1880, 650.Google Scholar

Jastrow, J. ‘Studies in spiritism.’ American Journal of Psychology, 22 (1911), 122–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jastrow, J. ‘The case of Lombroso.’ Dial, 47 (1909), 284–6.Google Scholar

Jastrow, J. ‘The case of Paladino.’ American Monthly Review of Reviews, 42 (1910), 74–84.Google Scholar

Jastrow, J. ‘The psychology of spiritualism.’ Popular Science Monthly, 34 (1889), 721–33.Google Scholar

Jastrow, J. ‘The psychology of spiritualism.’ Science, 8 (1886), 567–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jay, R.Learned Pigs and Fireproof Women. New York: Villard Books, 1987.Google Scholar

Jones, J. ‘An evening with Mr Home.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1861), 68–70.Google Scholar

Jones, L. ‘CSICOP's international conference in London: investigation and belief, past lives and prizes’, Skeptical Inquirer, 10:2 (1986), 98–104.Google Scholar

Jones, W., Russell, D. and Nickel, T. ‘Belief in the paranormal scale: an objective instrument to measure belief in magical phenomena and causes.’ Journal Supplement Abstract Service, Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 7, 100 (MS 1577), 1977.Google Scholar

‘Juggling, wizarding, and similar phenomena.’ Family Herald, 13 (1855), 349–50.

Kaufman, M. H. ‘Phrenology – confrontation between Gordon and Spurzheim – 1816.’ Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 29 (1999), 159–70.Google ScholarPubMed

Kennedy, J. E. ‘Why is psi so elusive? A review and proposed model.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 65 (2001), 219–46.Google Scholar

Koran, A.Bring Out the Magic in Your Mind. Preston: A. Thomas & Co., 1964.Google Scholar

Korem, D. and Meier, P.The Fakers. Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell Co., 1980.Google Scholar

Kurtz, P. ‘A quarter century of skeptical inquiry’, Skeptical Inquirer, 25:4 (2001), 42–7.Google Scholar

Kurtz, P. ed., A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Kurtz, P. ‘CSICOP at twenty.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 20:4 (1996), 5–8.Google Scholar

Kusch, M.Psychological Knowledge: a Social History and Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘Critically thinking about paranormal belief.’ In Della Sala, S., ed., Tall Tales about the Mind and Brain. Oxford University Press, 2007, 23–35.Google Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘Debunking and the psychology of error: a historical analysis of psychological matters.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7 (2010), 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘Discourse analysis as method in the history of psychology.’ History and Philosophy of Psychology, 9:2 (2007), 34–44.Google Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘How convincing is the evidence for D. D. Home?’ Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association International Conference, 1999, 166–79.Google Scholar

Lamont, P.Magic and Miracles in Victorian Britain. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.

Lamont, P. ‘Magic and the willing suspension of disbelief.’ In Allen, J. and O’Reilly, S., eds., Magic Show. London: Southbank Centre/Hayward Publishing, 2010, 30–1.Google Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘Magician as conjuror: a frame analysis of Victorian mediums.’ Early Popular Visual Culture, 4 (2006), 131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘Paranormal belief and the avowal of prior scepticism.’ Theory and Psychology, 17 (2007), 681–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘Reflexivity, the role of history, and the case mesmerism in early Victorian Britain.’ History of Psychology, 13 (2010), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lamont, P. ‘Spiritualism and a mid-Victorian crisis of evidence.’ Historical Journal, 47 (2004), 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamont, P.The First Psychic: the Peculiar Mystery of a Notorious Victorian Wizard. London: Little Brown, 2005.Google Scholar

Lamont, P. ‘The making of extraordinary psychological phenomena.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 48:1 (2012), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lamont, P. and Murphy, M. ‘The origins of the first psychic and other misrepresentations.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 70 (2006), 176–80.Google Scholar

Lamont, P. and Wiseman, R.Magic in Theory: an Introduction to the Theoretical and Psychological Elements of Conjuring. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lamont, P., Coelho, C., and McKinlay, A. (2009). ‘Explaining the unexplained: warranting disbelief in the paranormal.’ Discourse Studies, 11:5, 543, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, T. R. ‘Gathering in the sheep and goats: a meta-analysis of forced-choice sheep-goat ESP studies, 1947–1993.’ Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association 36th Annual Convention, 1993, 75–86.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. R. ‘How many factors of paranormal belief are there? A critique of the Paranormal belief scale.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 59 (1995), 3–25.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. R. ‘Moving on from the Paranormal Belief Scale: a final reply to Tobacyk.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 59 (1995), 131–40.Google Scholar

Leahey, T. H. and Leahey, G. E.Psychology's Occult Doubles: Psychology and the Problem of Pseudo-science. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1984.Google Scholar

Leary, D. E., ed., Metaphors in the History of Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

‘Lecture hall, Greenwich’, broadsheet for Vernon lecture, 4 January 1844 (Purland Papers).

‘Lecture on mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, 27 December 1842 (Purland Papers).

‘Lecture on mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, Kentish Mercury (?), c. March 1845 (Purland Papers).

‘Lecture on mesmerism.’ People's Phrenological Journal, 2 (1844), 172.

‘Lecture on mesmerism: extraordinary uproar and disgraceful attack on one of the patients.’ Morning Herald, 5 January 1844.

Lectures on mesmerism’, newspaper clipping from Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser, 3 January 1843 (Purland Papers).

‘Lectures on mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, March 1843 (Purland Papers).

Lee, E.Animal Magnetism and Magnetic Lucid Somnambulism. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1866.Google Scholar

Lester, G. ‘Why bad beliefs don't die.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 24:6 (2000), 40–3.Google Scholar

‘Letter’, Human Nature, 4 (1870), 133.

‘Letter from the late Prof. Gregory.’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 451–3.

Lewes, G. H. ‘Seeing is believing.’ Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, 88 (1860), 381–95.Google Scholar

‘Literary institution’, newspaper clipping, March 1845 (Purland Papers).

Loftus, E. ‘Remembering dangerously.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 19:2 (1995), 20–9.Google Scholar

Lombroso, C.After Death – What?Boston: Small, Maynard & Company, 1909.Google Scholar

‘London November 28.’ Newcastle Courant, 3 December 1831.

Luckhurst, R.The Invention of Telepathy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

‘Lyon v Home.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1868), 241–81.

Mackay, C.Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions. London: Richard Bentley, 1841.Google Scholar

Macmillan, K. and Edwards, D. ‘Who killed the princess? Description and blame in the British press.’ Discourse Studies, 1 (1999), 151–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magendie, F.An Elementary Treatise on Human Physiology. Trans. John Revere. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1855.Google Scholar

Magic, Pretended Miracles. London: Religious Tract Society, 1848.

‘Magician of the south.’ Bristol Mercury, 22 March 1845.

Mangan, M.Performing Dark Arts: a Cultural History of Conjuring. Bristol: Intellect Books, 2007.Google Scholar

‘Manifestations in England.’ Spiritual Herald, 1 (1856), 43–5.

Margolis, J.Uri Geller: Magician or Mystic?London: Orion, 1998.Google Scholar

Marion, F.In My Mind's Eye. With a Foreword by R. H. Thouless, MA, PhD, University Reader in Educational Psychology, Cambridge, and B. P. Weisner, DSc, PhD. London: Rider and Co., 1949.Google Scholar

Marks, D. ‘Remote viewing revisited.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 6:4 (1982), 18–29.Google Scholar

Marks, D. and Kamman, R. ‘The non-psychic powers of Uri Geller.’ Zetetic, 1 (1977), 9–17.Google Scholar

Marks, D. and Kamman, R.The Psychology of the Psychic. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1980.Google Scholar

Marshall, M. and Wendt, R. ‘Wilhelm Wundt, spiritism and the assumptions of science.’ In Bringmann, W. G. and Tweney, R. D., eds., Wundt Studies: a Centennial Collection. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe Inc., 1980, 158–75.Google Scholar

Marwick, B. ‘The Soal-Goldney experiments with Basil Shackleton: new evidence of data manipulation.’ Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 56 (1978), 250–77.Google Scholar

‘Maurice Fogel.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 34 (1947), 86–7.

Mauskopf, S. and McVaugh, M.The Elusive Science: Origins of Experimental Psychical Research. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Maven, M. ‘I’ll build a stairway to a paradox.’ Magic, 5:2 (1995), 23.Google Scholar

McCorristine, S.Spectres of the Self: Thinking about Ghosts and Ghost-seeing in England, 1750–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougall, W. ‘Psychical research as a university study.’ In Murchison, C., ed., The Case For and Against Psychical Belief, 149–62. Worcester: Clark University, 1927.Google Scholar

McLenon, J.Deviant Science: the Case of Parapsychology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Mesmeric case at Deptford.’ People's Phrenological Journal, 2 (1844), 137–8.

‘Mesmeric intelligence.’ People's Phrenological Journal, 2 (1844), 183–5.

‘Mesmerism’, advert, Glasgow Herald, 31 May 1844.

‘Mesmerism’, Kentish Independent, 10 February 1844, (Purland Papers).

‘Mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, 30 March 1843 (Purland Papers).

‘Mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, Kentish Mercury, 30 January 1844 (Purland Papers).

‘Mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, May 1843 (Purland Papers).

‘Mesmerism’, newspaper clipping, November 1843 (Purland Papers).

‘Mesmerism and its opponents.’ Medico-Chirurgical Review and Journal of Practical Medicine, 41, 1844, 142–3.

‘Mesmerism – clairvoyance’, Bulletin of Medical Science, 3 (1845), 389–90.

‘Modern necromancy.’ North British Review, 34 (1861), 110–41.

‘Modern Spiritualism.’ Quarterly Review, 114 (1863), 179–210.

Moore, R.In Search of White Crows. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Morris, R. L. ‘What psi is not: the necessity for experiments.’ In Edge, H., Morris, R. L., Palmer, J., and Rush, J., eds., Foundations of Parapsychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986, 70–110.Google Scholar

Morris, S. ‘Believing in ESP: effects of dehoaxing.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 4:3 (1980), 18–31.Google Scholar

Morus, I. ‘Seeing and believing science.’ Isis, 97 (2006), 101–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Mr Braid at the Royal Institution.’ Manchester Times and Gazette, 27 April 1844, 6.

‘Mr C. Foster – the medium from America.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1862), 45–8.

‘Mr C. H. Foster.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1862), 37–45.

‘Mr Home and the critics.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 215–19.

‘Mr Purland's letter.’ Forceps, 13 July 1844 (Purland Papers).

‘Mr S. C. Hall and Mr Foster.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1862), 89–92.

‘Mr Sothern and the Miracle Circle.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1866), 44.

‘Mr Vernon's experiments and the medical Society.’ Western Lancet: a Monthly Journal of Practical Medicine and Surgery, 3 (1844), 138–9.

Munsterberg, H. ‘My friends the spiritualists: some theories and conclusions concerning Eusapio Palladino.’ Metropolitan, 31 (1910), 559–72.Google Scholar

Munsterberg, H.Psychology and Social Sanity. New York: Doubleday, Page and Co., 1914, 146–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Mysterious Lady.’ Morning Chronicle, 12 March 1845, 1.

‘Mysterious Lady.’ Era, 30 March 1845, 3.

Nardi, P. ‘Toward a social psychology of entertainment magic.’ Symbolic Interaction, 7 (1984), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neher, A. ‘Parapsychology: science or magic?’ Skeptical Inquirer, 6:4 (1982), 54–6.Google Scholar

Nenadic, S. ‘Illegitimacy, insolvency and insanity: Wilkie Collins and the Victorian nightmares.’ In Marwick, A., ed., The Arts, Literature, and Society. London: Routledge, 1990, 133–62.Google Scholar

Newberg, A. and Waldman, M. R.Why We Believe What We Believe. New York: Free Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Nichols, T. L.A Biography of the Brothers Davenport. London: Saunders, Otley and Co., 1864.Google Scholar

Nichols, T. L.Supra-mundane Facts in the Life of Rev. Jesse Babcock Ferguson. London: F. Pitman, 1865.Google Scholar

Nixon, H. K. ‘Popular answers to some psychological questions.’ American Journal of Psychology, 36 (1925), 418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noakes, R. ‘Spiritualism, science and the supernatural in mid-Victorian Britain.’ In Boun, N., Burdett, C. and Thurschwell, P., eds., The Victorian Supernatural. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 23–43.Google Scholar

Noakes, R. ‘Telegraphy is an occult art: Cromwell Varley and the diffusion of electricity to the other world.’ British Journal for the History of Science, 32 (1999), 421–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noakes, R. ‘The bridge which is between physical and psychical research: William Fletcher Barrett, sensitive flames and spiritualism.’ History of Science, 42 (2004), 419–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noakes, R. ‘The world of the infinitely little: connecting physical and psychical realities in Britain c. 1900.’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 39 (2008), 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, C.Against Relativism: Philosophy of Science, Deconstruction and Critical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

‘On force, its mental and moral correlates.’ Athenaeum, 2 February 1867, 150.

Oppenheim, J.The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Ortiz, D.Strong Magic: Creative Showmanship for the Close-up Magician. Silver Spring, MD: Kaufman and Greenberg, 1994.Google Scholar

Otis, L. and Alcock, J. ‘Factors affecting extraordinary belief.’ Journal of Social Psychology, 118 (1982), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, A.The Darkened Room: Women, Power and Spiritualism in Late Victorian England. London: Virago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Owen, A.The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Padgett, V.Singer, B. and Benassi, V. ‘Belief in ESP among psychologists.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 5:1 (1980), 47–8.Google Scholar

‘Paid mediums versus ministers’, Medium and Daybreak, 2 (1871), 139.

Panati, C., ed., The Geller Papers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976.Google Scholar

Paris, J. A.Philosophy in Sport Made Science in Earnest. London: John Murray, 1853.Google Scholar

Parsinnen, T. ‘Mesmeric performers.’ Victorian Studies, 21 (1977), 87–104.Google Scholar

Pears, F. ‘Letter’, Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 84–6.Google Scholar

Persinger, M. A. and Richards, P. ‘Tobacyk's paranormal belief scale and temporal lobe signs: sex differences in the experience of ego-alien intrusions.’ Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73 (1991), 1151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petit, M. ‘The new woman as “tied up dog”: Amy Tanner's situated knowledges.’ History of Psychology, 11 (2008), 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philips, H. ‘Paranormal beliefs linked to brain chemistry.’ New Scientist, 2353 (2002), 17.Google Scholar

Pinch, T. ‘Normal explanations of the paranormal: the demarcation problem and fraud in parapsychology.’ Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979), 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinch, T. and Collins, H. ‘Private science and public knowledge: the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of the [sic] Claims of the Paranormal.’ Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984), 521–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plug, C. ‘The psychology of superstition: a review.’ Psychologia Africana, 16 (1976), 93–115.Google Scholar

Podmore, F. (1909). Mesmerism and Christian Science: a Short History of Mental Healing. Philadelphia: G. W. Jacobs.Google Scholar

Podmore, F.Modern Spiritualism: A History and a Criticism, 2 Vols. London: Methuen, 1902.Google Scholar

‘Popular scientific errors’, Yorkshire Spiritual Telegraph, 1 (1856), 169.

Potter, J.Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage Publications, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M.Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications, 1987.Google Scholar

‘Powell's spiritualism, its facts and phases.’ Athenaeum, 23 April 1864, 576.

Pratt, J. ‘Doctor Walford Bodie – the most remarkable man on earth.’ Call Boy, 27 (1990), 3.Google Scholar

Pratt, J. G., Rhine, J. B., Smith, B. M., Stuart, C. E., and Greenwood, J. A. Extra-Sensory Perception after Sixty Years. New York: Henry Holt, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, G. R. ‘Apology to Rhine and Soal.’ Science, 175 (1972), 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Price, G. R. ‘Science and the supernatural.’ Science, 122 (1955), 359–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Price, H.Confessions of a Ghost-Hunter. London: Putnam, 1936.Google Scholar

Price, H.Fifty Years of Psychical Research. London: Longman, Green and Co., 1939.Google Scholar

Price, H. and Dingwall, E.Revelations of a Spirit Medium. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd, 1922.Google Scholar

Prince, M. F.The Enchanted Boundary: Being a Survey of Negative Reactions to Claims of Psychic Phenomena. Boston: Boston Society for Psychic Research, 1930.Google Scholar

Pritchard, J.A Treatise on Insanity and Other Disorders Affecting the Mind. Philadelphia:E. L. Carey & A. Hart, 1837.Google Scholar

Proceedings of the Psychological Society of Great Britain, 1875–1879. London: privately printed, 1880.

‘Prof Pepper on spiritualism.’ Spiritualist, 2 (1872), 29.

‘Professor Gregory on Spiritualism.’ British Spiritual Telegraph, 1 (1857), 9.

‘Psychological literature.’ American Journal of Psychology, 1 (1887), 128–46.

‘Punch cartoon of the spirit hand.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 241–5.

Purland, T. ‘Mesmerism.’ Kentish Mercury, 30 January 1844 (Purland Papers).Google Scholar

Quinn, S. O. ‘How Southern New England became magnetic north: the acceptance of animal magnetism.’ History of Psychology, 10 (2007), 231–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Randi, J.The Magic of Uri Geller. New York: Ballantine Books, 1975.Google Scholar

Randi, J. ‘The role of conjurers in psi research.’ In Kurtz, A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology, 339–50.

Randi, J.The Supernatural A–Z. London: Headline Book Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar

Ransom, C. ‘Recent criticisms of parapsychology.’ Journal of the American Society of Psychical Research, 65 (1971), 289–307.Google Scholar

Rauscher, W.The Mind Readers: Masters of Deception. Woodbury, NJ: Mystic Light Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Reed, G. ‘The psychology of channeling’, Skeptical Inquirer, 13 (1989), 385–90.Google Scholar

‘Report on Spiritualism.’ Athenaeum, 28 October 1871, 556–8.

Report on Spiritualism of the Committee of the London Dialectical Society. London: J. Burns, 1873.

Rhine, J. B. ‘A new case of experimenter unreliability.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 38 (1974), 215–25.Google Scholar

Rhine, J. B.Extra-Sensory Perception. Boston: Bruce Humphries, 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhine, J. B.New Frontiers of the Mind. New York: Farrar and Rhinehart, 1937.Google Scholar

Rhine, J. B. ‘Note on Professor Thouless's review of Extra-sensory Perception.’ Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 43 (1935), 542–4.Google Scholar

Richards, G. ‘Edward Cox, the Psychological Society of Great Britain (1875–1879) and the meanings of an institutional failure.’ In Bunn, G., Lovie, A. and Richards, G., eds., Psychology in Britain, 33–53.

Richards, G. Mental Machinery: the Origins and Consequences of Psychological Ideas. Part 1, 1600–1850. London: Athlone Press, 1992.

Richards, G.On Psychological Language and the Basis of Human Nature. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Richards, G.Putting Psychology in its Place: a Critical Historical Overview. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

‘Ring out the old, ring in the new.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1868), 1–4.

Rinn, J.Searchlight on Psychical Research. London: Rider and Company, 1954.Google Scholar

Robert-Houdin, J. E.Secrets of Conjuring and Magic. Trans. and ed. with notes by Professor Hoffmann. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1900.Google Scholar

Rogo, D. S. ‘J. B. Rhine and the Levy scandal’. In Kurtz, A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology, 313–26.

Romanes, G. ‘Thought-reading.’ Nature, 24 (1881), 171–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rymer, J. S.Spirit Manifestations. London, 1857.Google Scholar

S. ‘Hypnotism, or Mr Braid's mesmerism.’ Medical Times, 10 (1844), 95.

Sagan, C.Broca's Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science. New York: Random House, 1979.Google Scholar

Saler, M. ‘Modernity and enchantment: a historiographic review.’ American Historical Review, 111 (2006), 692–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandby, G.Mesmerism and its Opponents with a Narrative of Cases. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longman's, 1844.Google Scholar

Sawyer, T. A.S. S. Baldwin and the Press. Santa Ana, CA: Author, 1993.Google Scholar

Scheidt, R. J. ‘Belief in supernatural phenomena and locus of control.’ Psychological Reports, 32 (1973), 1159–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmeidler, G. and Murphy, G. ‘The influence of belief and disbelief in ESP.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36 (1946), 271–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schmeidler, G. and McConnell, R.ESP and Personality Patterns. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Schmit, D. ‘Re-visioning antebellum American Psychology: the dissemination of mesmerism, 1836–1854.’ History of Psychology, 8 (2005), 403–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sedgwick, W. T. and Tyler, H. W.A Short History of Science. London: Macmillan and Co., 1917.Google Scholar

Serjeantson, R. W. ‘Testimony and proof in early modern England.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30 (1999), 195–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seybert Commission, Preliminary Report of the Commission Appointed by the University of Pennsylvania to Investigate Modern Spiritualism in Accordance with the Request of the Late Henry Seybert. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1920 (originally published 1887).Google Scholar

Shapin, S.A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Shapin, S. ‘The politics of observation: cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes.’ In Wallis, ed., On the Margins of Science, 139–78.

Shermer, M.The Believing Brain. New York: Times Books, 2011.Google ScholarPubMed

Shermer, M.Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudo-Science, Superstition and Other Confusions of Our Time. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997.Google Scholar

Shorter, T. ‘Spiritualism and the laws of nature.’ British Spiritual Telegraph, 2 (1858), 104.Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. ‘President's address.’ Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 1 (1882), 7–12.Google Scholar

Singer, B. and Benassi, V. ‘Fooling some of the people all of the time’, Skeptical Inquirer, 5:2 (1980), 17–24.Google Scholar

Singh, S. (2003). ‘Spectacular psychology or silly psycho-babble?’ Retrieved 10 September 2012 from .

‘Sir Charles Isham on spiritualism.’ Spiritual Herald, 1 (1856), 15–17.

‘Sir John Forbes.’ Medical Times and Gazette, 2 (1861), 506.

‘Sir William a Beckett the judge.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 352–6.

Smethurst, T. ‘Mesmerism unmasked.’ Medical Times, 9 (1843), 145–7.Google Scholar

Smith, R.Being Human: Historical Knowledge and the Creation of Human Nature. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Smith, R.The Fontana History of the Human Sciences. London: Fontana, 1997.Google Scholar

Smith, R. ‘The history of psychological categories.’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36 (2005), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Soal, S. G. ‘Experiments on Frederick Marion.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1950), 251–2.Google Scholar

Soal, S. G. ‘In my mind's eye. By Frederick Marion.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1950), 187–95.Google Scholar

Soal, S. G.Preliminary Studies of a Vaudeville Telepathist. London: University of London Council for Psychical Investigation, 1937.Google Scholar

Soal, S. G. ‘Some aspects of extrasensory perception.’ Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 49 (1952), 131–54.Google Scholar

Soal, S. G. and Bateman, F.Modern Experiments in Telepathy. London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1954.Google Scholar

Spanos, N. ‘Past-life regression: a critical review.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 12 (1987), 174–80.Google Scholar

Spicer, H.Facts and Fantasies: a Sequel to Sights and Sounds. London: T. Bosworth, 1853.Google Scholar

‘Spirit conjuring.’ Punch, 25 August 1860, 73.

‘Spirit-rapping.’ Literary Gazette, 8 September 1860, 180–1.

‘Spirits and spirit rapping.’ Westminster Review, 13 (1858), 29–66.

‘Spiritual manifestations – experiences of Hiram Powers – the sculptor.’ Spiritual Magazine, 5 (1870), 20–2.

‘Spiritualism.’ Fraser's Magazine, 65 (1862), 520–8.

‘Spiritualism, as related to Religion and Science.’ Fraser's Magazine, 71 (1865), 22–42.

‘Spiritualism and the age we live in.’ Athenaeum, 11 February 1860, 201–2.

‘Spiritualism at Brighton – the Davenports’ double.’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 127.

‘Spiritualism in Norwood.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1869), 336.

Spurzheim, J.The Physiognomical System of Drs Gall and Spurzheim. London: Bladwin, Cradock and Joy, 1815.Google Scholar

‘Stage imitation of spiritual phenomena.’ Spiritualist, 3 (1873), 137.

Subbotsky, E.Magic and the Mind: Mechanisms, Functions and Development of Magical Thinking and Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Superstition and science.’ Saturday Review, 12 January 1856, 194.

Swiss, J. I.Shattering Illusions. Seattle, WA: Hermetic Press, Inc., 2002.Google Scholar

‘Table-turning.’ Times, 30 June 1853, 8.

Tanner, A.Studies in Spiritism. New York: Appleton, 1910.Google Scholar

Tamariz, J.The Magic Way. Madrid: Frakson Books, 1988.Google Scholar

Targ, R. and Puthoff, H. ‘Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding.’ Nature, 251 (1974), 602–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

‘Testimony of non-spiritualists.’ Spiritualist, 1 (1869), 1–2.

‘Thackeray and Dickens on spiritualism.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 386–91.

Thalbourne, M. and Haraldsson, E. ‘Personality characteristics of sheep and goats.’ Personality and Individual Differences, 1 (1980), 180–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘The alleged case of clairvoyance.’ Manchester Times and Gazette, 27 April 1844, 5.

‘The Allen Boy medium's manifestations – the duplication theory.’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 259–63.

‘The Clarence vase.’ New Monthly Magazine, 36 (1832), 210.

‘The conversion of an MD to spiritualism.’ Spiritual Magazine, 2 (1867), 412.

‘The Cornhill Magazine, and Professor Challis, of Cambridge on Spiritualism.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 371–2.

‘The Davenport brothers.’ Spiritual Magazine, 5 (1864), 468–70.

‘The Davenport brothers.’ Spiritual Magazine, 5 (1864), 481–524.

‘The double-sighted phenomenon.’ Caledonian Mercury, 7 November 1831, no page number.

‘The double-sighted phenomenon.’ Derby Mercury, 7 December 1831, 2.

‘The exposure of spiritism.’ Scotsman, 17 January 1879, 4.

‘The extraordinary Scotch boy’, newspaper clipping, Sunday Times, 27 March 1833 (Ricky Jay collection).

‘The homoeopathic principle applied to insanity; a proposal to treat lunacy by Spiritualism.’ Asylum Journal of Mental Science, 4 (1858), 360–96.

‘The Lancet. London, Saturday, September 15 1838.’ Lancet, 30 (1838), 873–7.

‘The medium Colchester.’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 464–6.

‘The miracle circle.’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 559.

‘The people.’ People's Phrenological Journal, 2 (1844), 170–2.

‘The Piddingtons.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1949), 83–5.

‘The press.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 485.

‘The press and the mediums.’ Spiritual Magazine, 3 (1860), 147–53.

‘The Saturday Review.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 177.

‘The Spirit faith in America.’ Chambers Journal, 9 February 1856, 81–3.

‘The Westminster Review on spirits and spirit rapping by T.S.’ British Spiritual Telegraph, 2 (1858), 79.

‘Theatrical chit-chat.’ Morning Chronicle, 23 January 1832.

‘Thought-reading.’ Lancet, 117 (1881), 795.

‘Thought-reading.’ (London) Standard, 16 May 1881, 3.

‘Thought-reading demonstrations.’ British Medical Journal, 1 (1881), 814–16.

Thouless, R. H. ‘Dr Rhine's recent experiments on telepathy and clairvoyance and a reconsideration of J. E. Coover's conclusions on telepathy.’ Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 43 (1935), 24–37.Google Scholar

Thouless, R. H. ‘Experiments on Frederick Marion.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1950), 220–2.Google Scholar

Thouless, Robert H.From Anecdote to Experiment in Psychical Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.Google Scholar

Thurschwell, P.Literature, Technology and Magical Thinking, 1880–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. ‘Lehmann and Hansen on the telepathic problem.’ Science, 9 (1899), 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. ‘Professor James on telepathy.’ Science, 9 (1899), 687.Google Scholar

Titchener, E. B. ‘The feeling of being stared at.’ Science, 8 (1898), 895–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tobacyk, J. ‘Reduction in paranormal belief among participants in a college course.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 8:1 (1983), 57–61.Google Scholar

Tobacyk, J. and Milford, G. ‘Belief in paranormal phenomena: assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1983), 1029–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tobacyk, J. J. ‘Final thoughts on issues in the measurement of paranormal beliefs?’ Journal of Parapsychology, 59 (1995), 141–6.Google Scholar

Tobacyk, J. J. ‘What is the correct dimensionality of paranormal beliefs? A reply to Lawrence's critique of the Paranormal Belief Scale.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 59 (1995), 27–46.Google Scholar

‘Trickery in spiritualism.’ Spiritualist, 2 (1872), 41.

Triplett, N. ‘Communication.’ American Journal of Psychology, 12 (1900), 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trollope, T. A.What I Remember. London: Richard Bentley & Sons, 1887.Google Scholar

Truzzi, M. 1997. ‘Reflections on the sociology and social psychology of conjurors and their relations to psychical research’. In Krippner, S., ed., Advances in Parapsychological Research, VIII. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., 1997, 221–76.Google Scholar

Turner, F.Between Science and Religion: the Reaction to Scientific Naturalism in Late Victorian Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Tylor, E. B. ‘Ethnology and spiritualism.’ Nature, 5 (1872), 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van de Castle, R. and White, R. A. ‘A report on a sentence completion form of sheep-goat attitude scale.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 19 (1955), 171–9.Google Scholar

Van Wyhe, J.Phrenology and the Origins of Victorian Naturalism. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2004.Google Scholar

Varley, C. ‘Letter.’ Spiritual Magazine, 5 (1871), 465.Google Scholar

Venn, J. ‘Hypnosis and reincarnation: a critique and case study.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 12 (1988), 386–91.Google Scholar

Vernon, W. J. ‘Mr Vernon's experiments and the medical Society.’ Medical Times, 10 (1844), 94–5.Google Scholar

Vernon, W. J. and Kiste, A., ‘Phrenological visit to the Exeter Deaf and Dumb Asylum.’ Phrenological Journal, 14 (1841), 80–1.Google Scholar

Vernon, W. J. ‘Letter to Medical Times’, reprinted in People's Phrenological Journal, 2 (1844), 137–8.Google Scholar

Wallis, R., ed. On the Margins of Science: the Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. Sociology Review monograph 27. Keele: University of Keele, 1979.Google Scholar

Wason, J. ‘Letter.’ Spiritual Magazine, 1 (1860), 525.Google Scholar

Weber, M.The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1930.Google Scholar

Webster, Mrs. Scepticism and Spiritualism: the Experiences of a Sceptic by the Author of Aurelia. London: F. Pitman, 1865.Google Scholar

Weekes, W. H. ‘Reply to Dr Smethurst.’ Medical Times, 9 (1843), 322.Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. ‘Parapsychology – a correction.’ Science, 205 (1979), 144.Google Scholar

‘Why Galileo was persecuted.’ Spiritualist, 1 (1869), 2.

Whyte, T. ‘Re W. I. Bishop.’ Nature, 24 (1881), 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiesner, B. P. ‘Experiments on Frederick Marion.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 35 (1950), 222.Google Scholar

Wigan, A. L. ‘The hallucinating fraud – mesmerism.’ Lancet, 46 (1845), 136–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilbraham, E. B. ‘Letter.’ Spiritual Magazine, 4 (1863), 266.Google Scholar

Wiley, B.The Indescribable Phenomenon: the Life and Mysteries of Anna Eva Fay. Seattle, WA: Hermetic Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Wiley, B. ‘The thought-reader craze.’ Gibeciere, 4 (2009), 11–134.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. B. ‘The thought of late Victorian physicists.’ Victorian Studies, 15 (1971), 25–45.Google Scholar

Winter, A.Mesmerized: Powers of Mind in Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Wiseman, R. ‘The Fielding report: a reconsideration.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 58 (1992), 129–52.Google Scholar

Wiseman, R. and Watt, C. ‘Belief in psychic ability and the misattribution hypothesis: a qualitative review.’ British Journal of Psychology, 97 (2006), 323–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiseman, R., Smith, M. and Wiseman, J. ‘Eyewitness testimony and the paranormal.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 19:6 (1995), 29–35.Google Scholar

Wiseman, R., West, D. and Stemman, R. ‘Psychic crime detectives: a new test for measuring their successes and failures.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 20:1 (1996), 38–40, 58.Google Scholar

Wolframm, H. ‘Parapsychology on the couch: the psychology of occult belief in Germany, c.1870–1939.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 42 (2006), 237–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘Wonderful manifestations in India.’ Spiritual Magazine, 6 (1865), 120.

Wood, R. ‘Report of an investigation of the phenomena connected with Eusapia Palladino.’ Science, 31 (1910), 776–80.Google Scholar

Woods, P. ‘Evidence for the effectiveness of a reading program in changing beliefs in the paranormal.’ Skeptical Inquirer, 9:1 (1984), 67–70.Google Scholar

Woods, R. and Lead, B.Showmen or Charlatans? The Stories of ‘Dr’ Walford Bodie and ‘Sir’ Alexander Cannon. Rossendale: authors, 2005.Google Scholar

Woodward, C. and Mark, R.Maurice Fogel: In Search of the Sensational. Seattle, WA: Hermetic Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Wooffitt, R.Telling Tales of the Unexpected: the Organization of Factual Discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.Google Scholar

Young, A.The Harmony of Illusions: Inventing Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Young, R. M.Mind, Brain and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Zingrone, N. ‘From text to self: the interplay of criticism and response in the history of parapsychology.’ Unpublished thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2006.

Zorab, G. ‘Test sittings with D. D. Home at Amsterdam.’ Journal of Parapsychology, 34 (1978), 47–63.Google Scholar

Zusne, L. and Jones, W. H.Anomalistic Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar