Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T22:15:29.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Diagnosis

from Part II - Effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2018

Get access

Summary

Diagnosis is an essential part of medical practice. Since diagnosis often guides treatment, it is important to get it right. Classifying disease also helps physicians to communicate with each other. A category that is easily recognisable packs a great deal of useful information.

Ideally, diagnostic categories should be valid, that is describe illnesses that correspond to natural disease entities and that have a specific aetiology, a likely prognosis, and a predictable response to treatment (Robins ' Guze, 1970). Current diagnoses in psychiatry are too inexact to meet such criteria. The reason is that little is known about their aetiology and pathogenesis. In medicine, clinical observations can be confirmed using laboratory tests, genetic testing, imaging or biopsies. Psychiatry lacks any of these tools, and is not therefore in a position to define true diseases (Uher ' Rutter, 2012). The absence of a gold standard leaves diagnosis open to faddish ideas.

Classification systems

In the past, psychiatrists did not take diagnosis very seriously. Classifications were developed by the American Psychiatric Association: DSM-I (1952) and DSM-II (1968), and by the World Health Organization (ICD, 1993). But these systems were used for record-keeping, not for treatment-planning. In the 1960s, psychiatry came under attack for negligence about its diagnostic system. How could anyone consider the field scientific if practitioners could not agree on what was wrong with most of their patients? Reliability for even the most important diagnoses was low. It was also found that the same type of patient could be labelled ‘manic-depressive’ by British psychiatrists whereas Americans called them ‘schizophrenic’ (Cooper et al, 1972). It later turned out that a mistake of this kind could be even more serious than was thought at the time. The introduction of lithium, effective for bipolar disorder but not for schizophrenia, made differential diagnosis crucial. This was also an example, still unfortunately rare, in which specific responses to specific treatment methods contributed to the definition of a major mental disorder.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Royal College of Psychiatrists
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Diagnosis
  • Joel Paris
  • Book: Fads and Fallacies in Psychiatry
  • Online publication: 01 January 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Diagnosis
  • Joel Paris
  • Book: Fads and Fallacies in Psychiatry
  • Online publication: 01 January 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Diagnosis
  • Joel Paris
  • Book: Fads and Fallacies in Psychiatry
  • Online publication: 01 January 2018
Available formats
×