Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T09:31:11.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, Anil & Narain, Sunita. Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment, 1991.Google Scholar
Agrawala, Shardul. Explaining the Evolution of the IPCC Structure and Process. ENRP Discussion Paper E-97-05. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, 1997.Google Scholar
Aldy, Joseph E., Barrett, Scott & Stavins, Robert N.Thirteen Plus One: A Comparison of Global Climate Policy Architectures. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2003.Google Scholar
Baer, Paul & Athanasiou, Tom. Frameworks and Proposals: A Brief, Adequacy and Equity-Based Evaluation of Some Prominent Climate Policy Frameworks and Proposals. Global Issues Paper 30. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2007.Google Scholar
Baer, Paul, et al. The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework. 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2008.Google Scholar
Baumert, Kevin A., et al. Growing in the Greenhouse: Protecting the Climate by Putting Development First. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute, 2005.Google Scholar
Biermann, Frank. Science as Power in International Negotiations: Global Environmental Assessments between North and South. ENRP Discussion Paper 2000-17. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, 2000.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. International Climate Efforts beyond 2012: A Survey of Approaches. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2004.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel & Diringer, Elliot. Towards an Integrated Multi-track Climate Framework. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2007.Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, Laurence. The Global Environment Facility as a Pioneering Institution: Lessons Learned and Looking Ahead. Washington, D.C.: Global Environment Facility, 2003.Google Scholar
Bradley, Rob & McMahon, Hilary. The Role of Policies and Measures for Climate Mitigation in China. BASIC Project, Working Paper 4. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute, 2007.Google Scholar
Brown, Donald, et al. White Paper on the Ethical Dimensions of Climate Change. Philadelphia, Pa.: Rock Ethics Institute, n.d.
Buddemeier, Robert W., et al. Coral Reefs and Global Climate Change: Potential Contributions of Climate Change to Stresses on Coral Reef Ecosystem. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Climate Change, 2004.Google Scholar
Capoor, Karan & Ambrosi, Philippe. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2007. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar
Carlson, Curtis, et al. Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What Are the Gains from Trade? Discussion Paper 98-44-REV. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2000.Google Scholar
,Climate Change Science Program. Abrupt Climate Change: A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Reston, Va.: U.S. Geological Survey, 2008.Google Scholar
,Climate Technology Initiative. Methods for Climate Change Technology Needs Assessments and Implementing Activities: Developing and Transition Country Approaches and Experiences. Bonn, Germany: Climate Technology Initiative, 2002.Google Scholar
,Committee on Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years. Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2,000 Years. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 2006.Google Scholar
Cosbey, Aaron. Making Development Work in the CDM: Phase 2 of the Development Dividend Report. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2007.Google Scholar
Coninck, Heleen C., et al. Technology Transfer in the Clean Development Mechanism. Report ECN-E-07-009. The Hague, Netherlands: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands, 2007.Google Scholar
Elzen, Michel, et al. An Analysis of Options for Including International Aviation and Marine Emissions in a Post-2012 Climate Mitigation Regime. MNP Report 500114007/2007. The Hague: Netherlands Environment Agency, 2007.Google Scholar
Dessai, Suraje. The Climate Regime from The Hague to Marrakech: Saving or Sinking the Kyoto Protocol? Working Paper 12. Norwich, U.K.: Tyndall Centre, 2001.Google Scholar
,Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit. South-North Dialogue on Equity in the Greenhouse: A Proposal for an Adequate and Equitable Climate Change Agreement. Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Energy and Environment, 2004.Google Scholar
,Egenhofer, Christian & Cornillie, Jan. Reinventing the Climate Negotiations: An Analysis of COP 6. Policy Brief 1. Brussels, Belgium: Centre for European Policy Studies, 2001.Google Scholar
Egenhofer, Christian, et al. Positive Incentives for Climate Action. ECP Report 5. Brussels, Belgium: European Climate Change Programme, 2008.Google Scholar
Ellis, Jane. Evaluating Experience with Electricity-Generating GHG Mitigation Projects. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, 2003.Google Scholar
Ellis, Jane. Issues Relating to Implementing “Programmatic CDM.”Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, 2006.Google Scholar
Ellis, Jane, et al. Taking Stock of Progress under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004.Google Scholar
Ellis, Jane, et al. SD-PAMs: What, Where, When and How?Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, 2007.Google Scholar
,Export-Import Bank of the United States. Annual Report 2007. Washington, D.C.: Export-Import Bank of the United States, 2007.Google Scholar
Gitay, Habiba Gitay, et al., eds. Biodiversity and Climate Change. IPCC Technical Paper V. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 2002.
,Global Environment Facility. Investing in Our Planet: GEF Annual Report 2006-2007. Washington, D.C.: Global Environment Facility, 2008.Google Scholar
Goldemberg, José & Johansson, Thomas B., eds. World Energy Assessment: Overview 2004 Update. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2004.
Hare, Bill & Meinshausen, Malte. Background Information on Potential Loopholes in the Kyoto Protocol. Update for COP-6 (Part Two). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Greenpeace International, 2001.Google Scholar
Harris, Paul G.What's Fair? – International Justice from an Environmental Perspective. Working Paper. Columbia International Affairs Online, available at http://www.ciaonet.org/conf/hap01/.
Höhne, Niklas & Lahme, Esther. Types of Future Commitments under the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol Post-2012. Gland, Switzerland: World Wide Fund for Nature, 2005.Google Scholar
Höhne, Niklas & Moltman, Sarah. The Distribution of Emission Allowances under the Greenhouse Development Rights and Other Effort Sharing Approaches. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2008.Google Scholar
Holtwisch, Christoph. Asiatisch-pazifische Partnerschaft für umweltverträgliche Entwicklung und Klima – Blockade oder Antrieb für das internationale Klimaregime?Master's thesis, Fraunhofer-Institut für Umwelt-, Sicherheits- und Energietechnik and the Fern Universität in Hagen, 2007.Google Scholar
Houghton, John, et al., eds. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, vol. 3, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 1996.
,International Energy Agency. Biofuels for Transport: An International Perspective. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004.Google Scholar
,International Energy Agency. Prospects for CO2 Capture and Storage. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2004.Google Scholar
,International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2006.Google Scholar
,International Energy Agency. Energy Technology Perspectives – Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2006.Google Scholar
,International Energy Agency. Key World Energy Statistics. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2007.Google Scholar
,International Energy Agency. Renewables in Global Energy Supply: An IEA Fact Sheet. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2007.Google Scholar
,International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2007. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2007.Google Scholar
Keck, Alexander & Low, Patrick. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When and How?Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organization, 2004.Google Scholar
Martinot, Eric & McDoom, Omar. Promoting Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: GEF Climate Change Projects and Impacts. Washington, D.C.: Global Environment Facility, 2000.Google Scholar
,Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Future of Coal: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.Google Scholar
,McKinsey & Company. Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Curve. 2009.
Metz, Bert, et al., eds. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 2007.
Michaelowa, Axel & Purohit, Pallav. Additionality Determination of Indian CDM Projects: Can Indian CDM Developers Outwit the CDM Executive Board?Zurich, Switzerland: Climate Strategies, 2007.Google Scholar
Michaelowa, Axel & Stronzik, Marcus. Transaction Costs of the Kyoto Mechanisms. Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg Institute of International Economics, 2002.Google Scholar
Modi, Vijay, et al. Energy and the Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2006.Google Scholar
Müller, Benito. Equity in Climate Change: The Great Divide. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2002.Google Scholar
Müller, Benito. Nairobi 2006: Trust and the Future of Adaptation Funding. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2007.Google Scholar
Müller, Benito. Bali 2007: On the Road Again. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2007.Google Scholar
Müller, Benito & Winkler, Harald. One Step Forward and Two Steps Back? The Governance of the World Bank Climate Investment Funds. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
Re, Munich. Topicsgeo Annual Review: Natural Catastrophes 2003. Munich, Germany: Munich Re, 2004.Google Scholar
,Netherlands Energy Research Foundation et al. Potential and Cost of Clean Development, Options in the Energy Sector: Inventory of Options in Non-Annex I Countries to Reduce GHG Emissions. The Hague: Netherlands, 1999.Google Scholar
Newell, Richard G. & Pizer, William A.Regulating Stock Externalities under Uncertainty. Discussion Paper 99-10-REV. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2000.Google Scholar
Newell, Richard G. & Pizer, William A.Discounting the Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation: How Much Do Uncertain Rates Increase Valuations?Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2001.Google Scholar
Parry, Martin L., et al., eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 2007.
Penne, Joyce E., et al. IPCC Special Report, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 1999.Google Scholar
,Pew Center on Climate Change. Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the International Effort against Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: Pew Center on Climate Change, 2003.Google Scholar
,PriceWaterhouseCoopers. The World in 2050: The Implications of Global Growth for Carbon Emissions and Climate Change Policy, available at http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/dfb54c8aad6742db852571f5006dd532.
,Royal Society. Ocean Acidification Due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Policy Doc. 12/05. London: Royal Society, 2005.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jake, et al. Sector-Based Approach to the Post-2012 Climate Change Architecture. Washington, D.C.: Center for Clean Air Policy, 2006.Google Scholar
Sjöberg, Helen. From Idea to Reality: The Creation of the Global Environment Facility. Washington, D.C.: Global Environment Facility, 1994.Google Scholar
Sjöberg, Helen. Restructuring the GEF. Washington, D.C.: Global Environment Facility, 1999.Google Scholar
Solomon, Susan, et al., eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 2007.
Stern, Nicholas. The Economics of Climate Change. London: Cabinet Office, H.M. Treasury, 2006.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R.Montreal versus Kyoto: A Tale of Two Protocols. Working Paper 06-17. Washington, D.C.: AEI-Brookings, 2006.Google Scholar
,UN-Energy. Sustainable Bioenergy: A Framework for Decision-Makers. New York: United Nations, 2007.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Global Warming: Study on a Global System of Tradeable Carbon Emission Entitlements. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 1992.Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Programme. The Clean Development Mechanism: An Assessment of Progress. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2006.Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Programme. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. Human Development Report 2007/2008. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2007.Google Scholar
,United Nations Development Programme & World Bank. Energy Services for the Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2005.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme et al. World Energy Assessment. New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2000.Google Scholar
,United Nations Framework Convention Secretariat. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: The First 10 Years. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention Secretariat, 2004.Google Scholar
,United Nations Framework Convention Secretariat. Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention Secretariat, 2007.Google Scholar
,Upton, Simon & Doornbosch, Richard. Do We Have the Right R&D Priorities to Support the Energy Technologies of the Future?Paris: International Energy Agency, 2006.Google Scholar
,U.S. Department of State. The United States of America's Third National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State, 2002.Google Scholar
,U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. GHG Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environment Protection Agency, 2006.Google Scholar
,World Bank. Managing Climate Risk: Integrating Adaptation into World Bank Group Operations. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2006.Google Scholar
,World Bank. Clean Energy and Development: Towards an Investment Framework. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2006.Google Scholar
,World Bank. Clean Energy and Development: A Progress Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2006.Google Scholar
,World Bank. Clean Energy for Development: The World Bank Action Plan. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar
,World Bank. The Welfare Impact of Rural Electrification: A Reassessment of Costs and Benefits, an IEG Impact Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Independent Evaluation Group, 2008.Google Scholar
,World Meteorological Organization & United Nations Environment Programme. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 16 Years of Scientific Assessment in Support of the Climate Convention. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, 2004.Google Scholar
,World Resources Institute. Navigating the Numbers. Washington D.C.: World Resources Institute, 2005.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. 54(3) International Organization421–51 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Matthew D.Corrective Justice and Liability for Global Warming. 155 University of Pennsylvania Law Review1859–68 (2007).Google Scholar
Agrawala, Shardul. Early Science-Policy Interactions in Climate Change: Lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases. 9(2) Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions157–69 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akehurst, Michael. Equity and General Principles of Law. 25 International and Comparative Law Quarterly801–25 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberts, Colin M.Technology Transfer and Its Role in International Law: A Structural Dilemma. 6 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology63–84 (1992).Google Scholar
Barrett, Scott & Stavins, Robert N.Increasing Participation and Compliance in International Climate Change Agreements. 3 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics349–76 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Seth. Beyond the Ramsey Model for Climate Change Assessments. 7 Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics15–18 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blancoa, María Isabel & Rodrigues, Glória. Can the Future EU ETS Support Wind Energy Investments? 36(4) Energy Policy1509–20 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary. 18 Yale Journal of International Law451–558 (1993).Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel. Symposium: Customary (and Not So Customary) International Environmental Law. 3 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies105–20 (1995).Google Scholar
Bradbrook, Adrian J., et al. A Human Dimension to the Energy Debate: Access to Modern Energy Services. 26(4) Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law526–52 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta. COPing with Consent: Law-Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements. 15 Leiden Journal of International Law1–52 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World. 110(4) Ethics697–715 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Mark B., et al. 48,000 Years of Climate and Forest Change in a Biodiversity Hot Spot. 303(5659) Science827–29 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, Michael. Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: Customary International Law from an Interdisciplinary Perspective. 17 Michigan Journal of International Law109 (1995).Google Scholar
Caney, Simon. Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility and Global Climate Change 18 Leiden Journal of International Law747–75 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corfee-Morlot, Jan & Höhne, Niklas. Climate Change: Long-Term Targets and Short-Term Commitments. 13 Global Environmental Change277 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullet, Philippe. Differential Treatment in International Law: Towards a New Paradigm of Inter-state Relations. 10 European Journal of International Law549–68 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzen, Michel & Berk, Marcel. Options for Differentiation of Future Commitments in Climate Policy: How to Realize Timely Participation to Meet Stringent Climate Goals? 1(4) Climate Policy465–80 (2001).Google Scholar
Elzen, Michel, et al. Analysing Countries' Contributions to Climate Change: Scientific and Policy-Related Choices. 8(6) Environmental Science and Policy614–36 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elzen, Michel, et al. Multi-stage: A Rule-Based Evolution of Future Commitments under the Climate Change Convention. 6(1) International Environmental Agreements1–21 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Bob, et al. Rapid Freshening of the Deep North Atlantic Ocean over the Past Four Decades. 416 Nature832–37 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drumbl, Mark A.Poverty, Wealth, and Obligation in International Law. 76 Tulane Law Review843–90 (2002).Google Scholar
Feely, Richard A., et al. The Impact of Anthropogenic CO2 on the CaCO3 System in the Oceans. 305(5682) Science362–66 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, Jack. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Taking the First Steps towards a Global Response. 14 Southern Illinois University Law Journal231 (1990).Google Scholar
Grasso, Marco. A Normative Ethical Framework in Climate Change. 81(3–4) Climatic Change223–46 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenenberg, Helen & Sluijs, Jeroen. Valueloading and Uncertainty in a Sector-Based Differentiation Scheme for Emission Allowances. 71(1–2) Climatic Change75–115 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenenberg, Helen, et al. Global Triptych: A Bottom-Up Approach for the Differentiation of Commitments under the Climate Convention. 4(2) Climate Policy153–75 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, Michael. Seeking Fair Weather: Ethics and the International Debate on Climate Change. 71 International Affairs463–96 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, Michael & Yamin, Farhana. Climatic Collapse at The Hague: What Happened, Why and Where Do We Go from Here? 7 International Affairs261–76 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guston, David H.Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. 26(4) Science, Technology and Human Values339–408 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Bogi, et al. Decreasing Overflow from the Nordic Seas into the Atlantic Ocean through the Faroe Bank Channel since 1950. 411 Nature927–30 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffert, Martin I., et al. Energy Implications of Future Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content. 395(6704) Nature881–84 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtsmark, Bjart J. & Alfsen, Knut H.PPP-Correction of the IPCC Emission Scenarios – Does It Matter? 68(1–2) Climatic Change11–19 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotinski, Roberta, et al. Solving the Climate Problem. 46(10) Environment8–19 (2004).Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science. 26(2) Social Studies of Science393–418 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammen, Daniel F. & Nemet, Gregory F.Real Numbers: Reversing the Incredible Shrinking Energy R&D Budget. Issues in Science and Technology 84 (2005, Fall).Google Scholar
Kaasa, Stine Madland. The UN Commission on Sustainable Development: Which Mechanisms Explain its Accomplishments? 7(3) Global Environmental Politics107–129 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Nathaniel O., et al. The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy. 22 Harvard Environmental Law Review313–67 (1998).Google Scholar
Kerr, Richard A.U.S. Bites Greenhouse Bullet and Gags. 251 Science868 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinzig, Ann, et al. Coping with Uncertainty: A Call for a New Science-Policy Forum. 32(5) Ambio330–35 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, Harold. Review Essay: Why Do Nations Obey International Law? 106 Yale Law Journal2599–2659 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch. 8(4) European Journal of International Law566–82 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D.Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. 36(2) International Organization185–205 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankao, Patricia Romero, et al. Development and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Deviate from the “Modernization” Theory and “Convergence” Hypothesis. 38 Climate Research17–29 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mace, M. J.Funding for Adaptation to Climate Change: UNFCCC and GEF Developments since COP-7. 14(3) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law225–38 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Michael, et al. Global-Scale Temperature Patterns and Climate Forcing over the Past Six Centuries. 392 Nature779–87 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsui, Yoshiro. Some Aspects of the Principle of “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities.” 2(2) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics151–70 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, Naoki. CDM in the Kyoto Negotiations: How CDM Has Worked as a Bridge between Developed and Developing Worlds? 8 Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change191–203 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffrey, Stephen. The Contribution of the UN Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigable Uses of International Watercourses. 1 International Global Environmental Issues250–63 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Stephen & McKitrick, Ross. Corrections to the Mann et al (1998) Proxy Data Base and Northern Hemisphere Average Temperature Series. 14(6) Energy and Environment751–72 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelowa, Axel, et al. Issues and Options for the Post-2012 Climate Architecture – An Overview. 5 International Environmental Agreements5–18 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Clark A.Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. 26(4) Science, Technology and Human Values478–500 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millock, Katrin. Technology Transfers in the Clean Development Mechanism: An Incentives Issue. 7 Environment and Development Economics449–66 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nentjes, Andries & Klaassen, Ger.On the Quality of Compliance Mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol. 32(4) Energy Policy531–34 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. In Defence of Historical Accountability for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 33(2) Ecological Economics185–92 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, William. A Review of the Stern Review of the Economics of Global Warming. 45 Journal of Economic Literature686–702 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmstead, Sheila M. & Stavins, Robert M.An International Policy Architecture for the Post-Kyoto Era. 96(2) American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings35 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi. Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. 306(5702) Science1686 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, Hermann E., et al. It Takes Two to Tango – Climate Policy at COP 10 in Buenos Aires and Beyond. Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law84–94 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Hermann E., et al. The Montreal Climate Summit: Starting the Kyoto Business and Preparing for Post-2012. 3(2) Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law90–100 (2006).Google Scholar
Pacala, Steven & Socolow, Robert. Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies. 305(5686) Science968–72 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, Edward. Intergenerational Justice and Climate Change. 47(1) Political Studies53–66 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Jiahua. Commitment to Human Development Goals with Low Emissions: An Alternative to Emissions Caps for Post-Kyoto from a Developing Country Perspective. 5(1) International Environmental Agreements89–104 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Shaobing, et al. Rice Yields Decline with Higher Night Temperature from Global Warming. 101(27) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States9971–75 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philibert, Cédric. Climate Mitigation: Approaches for Future International Cooperation. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Energy Agency, 2005.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. Priorities of Global Justice. 32 Metaphilosophy9–20 (2001).Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. & Sunstein, Cass. Climate Change Justice. 96 Georgetown Law Journal1593–94 (2008).Google Scholar
Rahmstorf, Stefan. A Semi-empirical Approach to Projecting Future Sea-Level Rise. 315 Science368–70 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raupach, Michael R., et al. Global and Regional Drivers of Accelerating CO2 Emissions. 104(24) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States10288–93 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringius, Lasse, et al. Burden Sharing and Fairness Principles in International Climate Policy. 2(1) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics1–22 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Anthea Elizabeth. Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation. 95 American Journal of International Law757–91 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Adam, et al. International Equity and Differentiation in Global Warming Policy: An Application to Tradeable Emission Permits. 12(1) Environmental and Resource Economics25–51 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabine, Christopher L., et al. The Oceanic Sink for Anthropogenic CO2. 305(5682) Science367–71 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sands, Phillipe. The “Greening” of International Law: Emerging Principles and Rules. 1 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies293–310 (1994).Google Scholar
Schneider, Malte, et al. Understanding the CDM's Contribution to Technology Transfer. 36 Energy Policy2930–38 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry. Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions. 15 Law and Policy39–59 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry. After You: May Action by the Rich Be Contingent upon Action by the Poor? 1 Indiana Global Legal Studies343–66 (1994).Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. Global Environment and International Inequality. 75(3) International Affairs533–37 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Gerry J.Is International Law Fair? 17 Michigan Journal of International Law615–42 (1996–1997).Google Scholar
Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie. International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda. 87 American Journal of International Law205–39 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, Urs.The Market for Tradable GHG Permits under the Kyoto Protocol: A Survey of Model Studies. 25(3) Energy Economics527–51 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavins, Robert N.What Can We Learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 Allowance Trading. 12(3) Journal of Economic Perspectives69–88 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Christopher D.Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law. 98 American Journal of International Law276–301 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, Peter A., et al. Human Contribution to the European Heatwave of 2003. 432 Nature610–14 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugiyama, Taishi & Sinton, Jonathan. Orchestra of Treaties: A Future Climate Regime Scenario with Multiple Treaties among Like-Minded Countries. 5(1) International Environmental Agreements65–88 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symposium on Thomas M. Franck's Fairness in International Law and Institutions. 13(4) European Journal of International Law901–1030 (2002).CrossRef
Tangen, Kristian & Hasselknippe, Henrik. Converging Markets. 5(1) International Environmental Agreements47–64 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasioulas, John. International Law and the Limits of Fairness. 13 European Journal of International Law993–1010 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tol, Richard S. J. & Verheyen, Roda. State Responsibility and Compensation for Climate Change Damages – A Legal and Economic Analysis. 32 Energy Policy1109–30 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, Phillip R.Globalization, International Institutions, and the Erosion of National Sovereignty and Democracy. 95 Michigan Law Review1944–69 (1996–1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoosel, Gaetan. Beyond the Unsustainable Rhetoric Sustainable Development: Transferring Environmentally Sound Technologies. 11 Georgetown International Environmental Law Review49 (1998).Google Scholar
Victor, David G., et al. A Madisonian Approach to Climate Policy 309(5742) Science1820 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, Rie, et al. The Bali Roadmap for Global Climate Policy – New Horizons and Old Pitfalls. 5(2) Journal of European Environmental and Planning Law139–54 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M. L.Prices vs. Quantities. 41(4) Review of Economic Studies477–91 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyant, John P., ed. The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-model Evaluation. Special Issue, Energy Journal (1999).Google Scholar
Wigley, Thomas, et al. Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations. 379 Nature240–43 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Shand. State Consent and the Sources of International Law. 86 American Society of International Law Proceedings108 (1992).Google Scholar
Winkler, Harald. Measurable, Reportable and Verifiable: The Keys to Mitigation in the Copenhagen Deal. 8 Climate Policy534–47 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Harald, et al. Methods for Quantifying the Benefits of Sustainable Development Policies and Measures (SD-PAMs). 8 Climate Policy119–34 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, Neil, et al., eds. Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006.
Aldy, Joseph E. & Stavins, Robert N., eds. Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate on the Post-Kyoto World. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007.CrossRef
,American Law Institute. Restatement of the Law, Third, Foreign Relations Law of the United States. Philadelphia, Pa.: American Law Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
Andersen, Stephen O. & Sarma, L. Madhava. Protecting the Ozone Layer: The United Nations History. London: Earthscan, 2002.Google Scholar
Andresen, Steinar, et al., eds. Science and Politics in International Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press, 2000.
Archer, David. The Long Thaw: How Humans Are Changing the Next 100,000 Years of Earth's Climate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Ross, W. D., trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Athanasiou, Tom & Baer, Paul. Dead Heat, Global Justice and Global Warming. New York: Seven Stories Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Barrett, Scott. Environment and Statecraft. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedjaoui, Mohammed. Towards a New International Economic Order. New York: Holmes and Meier, 1979.Google Scholar
Benedick, Richard Elliot. Ozone Diplomacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, V. & Glyn, Andrew, eds. The North the South and the Environment: Ecological Constraints and the Global Economy. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 1995.
Birnie, Patricia & Boyle, Alan. International Law and the Environment. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja & Kellow, Aynsley. International Environmental Policy: Interests and the Failure of the Kyoto Process. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lester R.Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization. 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 2008.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian.Principles of Public International Law. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bruce, James P., et al., eds. Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Brunnée, Jutta & Hay, Ellen, eds. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. Vol. 9. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Canan, Penelope & Reichman, Nancy. Ozone Connections: Expert Networks in Environmental Governance. Sheffield, U.K.: Greenleaf, 2002.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram & Chayes, Antonia Handler. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with Treaties in International Regulatory Regimes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Cleveland, Cutler, J., ed. Encyclopedia of Earth. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, 2007.
Conway, John K., et al., eds. Earth, Air, Fire, Water. Amherst: University ofMassachusetts Press, 1999.
Cordonier Segger, Marie & Khalfan, Ashfaq. Sustainable Development Law: Principles, Practices and Prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Herman E. & Townsend, Kenneth N., eds. Valuing the Earth: Economics, Ecology, Ethics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1993.
Dugard, John. International Law: A South African Perspective. 2nd ed. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta, 2000.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Ezrahi, Yaron. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Tim. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M.The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M.Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Freestone, David & Streck, Charlotte, eds. Legal Aspects of Implementing the Kyoto Protocol Mechanisms: Making Kyoto Work. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Gelbspan, Ross.The Heat Is On: The High Stakes Battle over the Earth's Threatened Climate. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1997.Google Scholar
Grubb, Michael, et al. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1999.Google Scholar
Hackett, Steven C.Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: Theory, Policy and the Sustainable Society. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar
Hampson, Fen Osler & Reppy, Judith, eds. Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Hansen, Michael W., ed. Managing the Environment across Borders: A Study of TNC Affiliates' Environmental Practices in China, Malaysia and India. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 2002.
Hare, R. M.Moral Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, et al. Theories of International Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Robert L., et al. Greening Aid?: Understanding the Environmental Impact of Development Assistance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Barry, ed. The Ethical Dimensions of Global Change. London: Macmillan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtwisch, Christoph. Das Nichteinhaltungsverfahren des Kyoto-protokolls: Enstehung-Gestalt-Wirkung. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, John, et al., eds. Scientific Assessment of Climate Change – Report of Working Group 1 of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Houghton, John, et al., eds. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Houghton, John, et al., eds. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Hurrell, Andrew & Kingsbury, Benedict, eds. The International Politics of the Environment: Actors, Interests, and Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Jasanoff, Sheila. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kaul, Inge, et al., eds. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRef
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Kimball, Lee A.Treaty Implementation: Science and Technical Advice Enters a New Stage. Washington, D.C.: American Society of International Law, 1996.Google Scholar
Kleinman, Daniel Lee, et al., eds. Controversies in Science and Technology: From Climate to Chromosomes. Vol. 2. New Rochelle, NY: Mary Anne Liebert, 2008.
Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Leggett, Jeremy K.The Carbon War: Global Warming and the End of the Oil Era. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Lomborg, Bjørn, ed. Global Crises, Global Solutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRef
Lovelock, John. The Revenge of Gaia. New York: Basic Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Lovelock, John. The Vanishing Face of Gaia: A Final Warning. New York: Basic Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Luterbacher, Urs & Sprinz, Detlef F., eds. International Relations and Global Climate Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.
Lyons, David. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibben, William. The End of Nature. New York: Random House, 1989.Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., et al. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books, 1972.Google Scholar
Michaels, Patrick. The Satanic Gases. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Michaels, Patrick. Meltdown: The Predictable Distortion of Global Warming by Scientists, Politicians and the Media. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 2004.Google Scholar
Miller, Clark A. & Edwards, Paul N., eds. Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.
Minzer, Irving L. & Leonard, J. Amber, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRef
Morgenthau, Hans J.Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th ed. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar
Nakicenovic, Nebojsa & Swart, Rob, eds. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000.
,National Academy of Sciences. Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2002.Google Scholar
,National Academy of Sciences. Knowledge and Diplomacy: Science Advice in the United Nations System. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Oberthur, Sebastian & Ott, Hermann E.The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Edward A.Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Patterson, Dennis, ed. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Pogge, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. 2nd ed. Malden, Mass.: Polity Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya. Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Rayner, Steve & Malone, Elizabeth M., eds. 4 Human Choice and Climate Change. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press, 1999.
Sands, Philippe, ed. Greening International Law. New York: New Press, 1993.
Singer, Fred S.Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate. Oakland, Calif.: Independent Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. One World: The Ethics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schellenberger, Michael & Nordhaus, Ted. Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.Google Scholar
Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, et al., eds. Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Schneider, Stephen H., et al., eds. Climate Change Policy: A Survey. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 2002.
Shelton, Dinah, ed. Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Smil, Vaclav. Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Steve & Skea, Jim, eds. Pollution for Sale: Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1999.
Speth, James Gustave. The Bridge at the End of the World: Capitalism, the Environment, and Crossing from Crisis to Sustainability. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Stevens, William K.The Change in the Weather: People, Weather, and the Science of Climate. New York: Random House, 2001.Google Scholar
Stokke, Olaf Schramm, et al., eds. Implementing the Climate Regime: International Compliance. London: Earthscan, 2005.
Toman, Michael A., ed. Climate Change Economics and Policy: An RFF Anthology. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2001.
Tóth, Ferenc L., ed. Fair Weather? Equity Concerns in Climate Change. London: Earthscan, 1999.
Verheyen, Roda. Climate Change and International Law: Prevention Duties and State Responsibility. Boston: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Victor, David. The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2001.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Weart, Spencer R.The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Weiss, Edith Brown. In Fairness to Future Generations. Ardsley, NY: Transnational, 1989.Google Scholar
Weiss, Edith Brown & Jacobson, Harold K., eds. Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998.
Yamin, Farhana & Depledge, Joanna. The International Climate Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Friedrich Soltau
  • Book: Fairness in International Climate Change Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 24 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635403.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Friedrich Soltau
  • Book: Fairness in International Climate Change Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 24 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635403.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Friedrich Soltau
  • Book: Fairness in International Climate Change Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 24 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635403.008
Available formats
×