Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-15T19:36:02.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Banner hierarchy and demographic privilege

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2009

James Z. Lee
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Cameron D. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of California, Pasadena
Get access

Summary

In Daoyi, all together 1,400 men rose in the banner hierarchy: 400 in the occupational hierarchy and 1000 in the organizational hierarchy. These men in theory were the elite of rural banner society. They were assumed to be the most capable. They were stipulated to be the best paid. And they were supposed to be the most powerful. If they were as privileged in fact as they were in theory, this should be apparent in their demographic behavior. We have already seen in Chapter 7 how marriage, fertility, and even mortality were related to position in the domestic hierarchy. In this chapter we explore how they were also related to position in the banner hierarchies.

We divide our chapter into two sections, each with its own methodology. In section I, we follow the arithmetic methodology used in Chapter 7 to analyze the distribution of privilege within the household, calculating measures of demographic performance—the proportion married, and the number and sex ratio of children “born”—according to the various categories of banner service. In section II, we introduce logistic regression to compare the effects of position in the banner and household hierarchies on demographic behavior and determine their relative importance.

In so doing, we differentiate not only the degree of demographic privilege enjoyed by the household and banner hierarchies over ordinary men, but also the degree of privilege within these hierarchies. Thus we see whether artisans were above soldiers, and whether civil officials were on equal footing with military officials. While we have a clear understanding of the normative ordering of position within the household, our knowledge of the banner hierarchy is much less complete.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fate and Fortune in Rural China
Social Organization and Population Behavior in Liaoning 1774–1873
, pp. 177 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×