Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T21:28:03.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Students Initiating Feedback

The Potential of Social Media

from Section 4: - Engaging with Feedback: Student Participation Dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2019

By
Soobin Yim  and
Mark Warschauer
Edited by
Ken Hyland  and
Fiona Hyland
Ken Hyland
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Fiona Hyland
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Feedback in Second Language Writing
Contexts and Issues
 , pp. 285 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bikowski, D. & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–28.Google Scholar
Boyd, M. & Maloof, V. M. (2000). How teachers can build on student-proposed intertextual links to facilitate student talk in the ESL classroom. In Hall, J. K. & Verplaetse, L S. (Eds.), Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction (pp. 163–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative writing with web 2.0 technologies: education students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, IIP73–IIP103.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Diao, Y. & Zhang, J. (2011, September). Social media: Communication characteristics and application value in distance education. In Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 6774–6777). IEEE.Google Scholar
Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Strategic uses of peer learning in children’s education. In Berndt, T.. & Ladd, G. (Eds.), Peer Relationships in Child Development, (pp. 135–57). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Kirschner, P. A. (Ed.), Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL? (pp. 69–91). Open Universiteit, Nederland: Heerlen.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, 33456.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J. & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39–58.Google Scholar
Guardado, M. & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–61.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social‐cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 484–496.Google Scholar
Guerrero, M. C. M. de & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 7(2), 109.Google Scholar
Hedgcock, J. & Ferris, D. R. (2013). Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ho, M. C. & Savignon, S. J. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 269–90.Google Scholar
Hsieh, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–88.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K. & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education For the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2009). L2 pragmatic development. The New Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 2, 259–84.Google Scholar
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D. & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–91.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Liu, J. & Sadler, R. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193–227.Google Scholar
Mehisto, P. (2012). Excellence in Bilingual Education: A Guide for School Principals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, J. S., Wang, D., Zhang, J. & Olson, G. M. (2017). How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(1), 1–40Google Scholar
Posner, I. & Baecker, R. (1992). How People Write Together. Proceedings 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol IV, 1992, 127–38.Google Scholar
Richardson, W. (2010). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. New York: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, 183–204.Google Scholar
Saddler, B. & Graham, S. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more and less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 43.Google Scholar
Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 103–34.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M. P. & Liu, M. (2013). Learning a language with Web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233–59.Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 305–22.Google Scholar
Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. CALICO Journal, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. C. & Chang, Y. J. (2012). Blogging to learn- Becoming EFL academic writers through collaborative dialogues. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. & Black, R. W. (2007). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 133–60.Google Scholar
Trentin, G. (2009). Using a wiki to evaluate individual contribution to a collaborative learning project. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 43–55.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 245.Google Scholar
Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 51–75.Google Scholar
Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. (pp. 246–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, (81)4, Special Issue: Interaction, Collaboration, and Cooperation: Learning Languages and Preparing Language Teachers. (Winter, 1997), 470–81.Google Scholar
Weissberg, R. (2006). Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing. Contexts and Issues. (pp. 246–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yim, S. (2017). Digital literacy in academic settings: Synchronous collaborative writing among linguistically diverse students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine. U.S.A.Google Scholar
Yim, S., Wang, D., Olson, J., Vu, V., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Synchronous Collaborative Writing in the Classroom: Undergraduates’ Collaboration Practices and their Impact on Writing Style, Quality, and Quantity. Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing.Google Scholar
Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts- Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146–65.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×