Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:37:11.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The Gendered State and Women's Political Leadership

Explaining the American Puzzle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Beverley Baines
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Daphne Barak-Erez
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Tsvi Kahana
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The United States has presented a puzzle to those trying to understand women's political representation. Political representation is a basic component of every democratic political system. Democracy refers to the participation of people in their own government, that is, the rule of the people. In a representative democracy such as the United States, the two most important components of political rule are the right to vote and the right to hold office. One of the major principles in a democratic political system is that a democratic body such as Congress should reflect the characteristics of the population. If the population is 51 percent women then something close to 51 percent women should be in representative institutions. However, as of 2008, women constitute only 16.8 percent of the House of Representatives. This means that women are underrepresented in the House by 34.1 percent. The extreme gap between the population percentage of women and their representation in the House makes women the most underrepresented subordinate group in American society, more so than that of African Americans, Hispanics, or Asians, as illustrated in Figure 9.1.

The low political representation of women in Congress also ranks the United States an abysmal eighty-fourth in the world, trailing behind comparable Western democracies such as Sweden, 47 percent, Finland, 41.5 percent, the Netherlands, 39.3 percent, Denmark, 38 percent, Spain, 36.3 percent, Belgium, 35.3 percent, Germany, 31.6 percent, and Switzerland, 28.5 percent, but also trailing behind many less wealthy and less economically privileged countries such as Ecuador, 25 percent, Seychelles, 23.5 percent, Tunisia, 22.8 percent, and Eritrea, 22 percent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Feminist Constitutionalism
Global Perspectives
, pp. 169 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mansbridge, JaneShould Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’ 61 1999
McDonagh, EileenIt Takes a State: A Policy Feedback Model of Women's Political Representation 8 2010
Matland, Richard E.Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries 23 1998
2003
2001
Suk, JeannieThe True Woman: Scenes from the Law of Self-Defense 31 2008
Weber, Max 1946
1993
1776
Aolain, Fionnuala NiThe Fractured Soul of the Dayton Peace Agreement: A Legal Analysis 19 1998
1913
Monopoli, Paula A.Gender and Constitutional Design 115 2006
Lawless, Jennifer L.Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era 57 2004
McSally, MarthaWomen in Combat: Is the Current Policy Obsolete? 14 2007
Skowronek, StephenThe Conservative Insurgency and Presidential Power: A Developmental Perspective on the Unitary Executive 122 2009
Labash, Matt 2002
LaFrance, MarianneThe Schemas and Schemes in Sex Discrimination 65 1999
Eckes, T.Explorations in Gender Cognition: Content and Structure of Female and Male Subtypes 12 1994
Valian, Virginia 1998
Eagly, A. H.Gender and the Effectiveness of Leaders: A Meta-analysis 117 1995PubMed
1996
Trempe, J.Subordinate Satisfaction with Male and Female Managers: Role of Perceived Supervisory Influence 70 1985
Nolan, Chris 2004
DeConde, Alexander 2002
Dahlerup, Drude 2002
Krook, Mona LenaReforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide 2 2006
Zetterberg, Pär 2008
Rosenblum, DarrenParity/Disparity: Electoral Gender Inequality on the Tightrope of Liberal Constitutional Traditions 39 2006
2007
2005

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×