Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:00:51.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

45 - Early childhood neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants

from Section 6 - Assessing outcome of the brain-injured infant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

By
Susan R. Hintz
Edited by
David K. Stevenson ,
William E. Benitz ,
Philip Sunshine ,
Susan R. Hintz  and
Maurice L. Druzin
David K. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
William E. Benitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Philip Sunshine
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Susan R. Hintz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Maurice L. Druzin
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Get access

Summary

Epidemiology of preterm birth: framing the issues of sequelae

Preterm birth is a substantial and growing problem for developed nations. In the United States between 1990 and 2004, the proportion of live-born infants delivered preterm (< 37 weeks estimated gestational age, EGA) rose from 10.6% to 12.5%; the proportion delivered very preterm (< 32 weeks EGA) rose from 1.92% to 2.01%. Thus, more than 500,000 preterm infants and 82,000 very preterm infants were born in the United States alone in 2004. With improvements in perinatal and neonatal care and technology over the past decades, survival of preterm infants has improved significantly, particularly among the smallest and most immature subgroups. In the Netherlands, survival to discharge for infants of 22–27 weeks EGA rose from 36.1% to 67.8% between 1983 and 1995. In two large regional tertiary care centers in Sweden, survival to discharge for live-born infants of 23–25 weeks EGA increased from 55% to 78% from 1992 to 1998. In the state of Victoria, Australia, survival to discharge among infants of 23–27 weeks EGA increased from 56% in 1991–92 to 72% in 1997; of note in the 1997 birth cohort, survival was 41%, 41%, and 73% for 23-, 24-, and 25-week EGA groups, respectively. For extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) infants overall in Victoria, survival rate increased from 38% in 1985–87, to 56% in 1991–92, to 73% in 1997.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal and Neonatal Brain Injury , pp. 544 - 555
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2006; 55 (1). www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr55. Accessed April, 2008.
Fanaroff, AA, Stoll, BJ, Wright, LL, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 147.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anthony, S, Ouden, L, Brand, R, et al. Changes in perinatal care and survival in very preterm and extremely preterm infants in the Netherlands between 1983–1995. Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol 2004; 112: 170–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serenius, F, Ewald, U, Farooqui, A, et al. Short-term outcome after active perinatal management at 23–25 weeks of gestation: a study from two Swedish tertiary care centres. Part 2: infant survival. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93: 1081–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, LW, VICS Group. Neonatal intensive care at borderline viability: is it worth it? Early Hum Dev 2004; 80: 103–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, LW. Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 11: 139–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costeloe, K, Hennessy, E, Gibson, AT, et al. The EPICure Study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 659–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tommiska, V, Helnonen, K, Lehtonen, L, et al. No improvement in outcome of nationwide extremely low birth weight infant populations between 1996–1997 and 1999–2000. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, LW, Morley, CJ, Halliday, J. Prediction of survival for preterm births: data on the quality of survival are needed. BMJ 2000; 320: 648.Google ScholarPubMed
Leeuw, R, Cuttini, M, Nadai, M, et al. Treatment choices for extremely preterm infants: an international perspective. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 608–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, LW for the VICS Group. Changing availability of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infant in Victoria over two decades. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 136–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Bode, MM, O'Shea, TM, Metzguer, KR, et al. Perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in North Carolina, 1968–1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 1302–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrou, S. The economic consequence of preterm birth during the first 10 years of life. BJOG 2005; 112: 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, KM, Barfield, WD, Ayadi, MF, et al. Preterm birth-associated cost of early intervention service: an analysis by gestational age. Pediatrics 2007; 119: e866–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, LW, the VICS Group. Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades: II. Efficiency. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 510–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saigal, S, Rosenbaum, P. What matters in the long term: reflections on the context of adult outcomes versus detailed measures in childhood. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 12: 417–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, M, Taylor, HG, Drotar, D, et al. Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 333–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ment, LR, Vohr, B, Allan, W, et al. Change in cognitive function over time in very low-birth-weight infants. JAMA 2003; 289: 705–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilbride, HW, Thurstad, K, Daily, DK. Preschool outcome of less than 801 gram preterm infants compared with full-term siblings. Pediatrics 2004; 13: 742–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Outcome at 2 years of children 23–27 weeks' gestation born in Victoria in 1991–92. J Paediatr Child Health 1997; 33: 161–5.
Wood, NS, Marlow, N, Costeloe, K, et al. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 378–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, NS, Costeloe, K, Gibson, AT, et al. The EPICure study: association and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F134–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tommiska, V, Heinonen, K, Kero, P, et al. A national two-year follow-up study of extremely low birthweight infants born in 1996–1997. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F29–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, M, Wilson-Costello, D, Friedman, H, et al. Neurodevelopment and predictors of outcomes of children with birth weights of less than 1000 g 1992–1995. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 725–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson-Costello, D, Friedman, H, Minich, N, et al. Improved survival rates with increased neurodevelopmental disability for extremely low birth weight infants in the 1990s. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson-Costello, D, Friedman, H, Minich, N, et al. Improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants in 2000–2002. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emsley, HCA, Wardle, SP, Sims, DG, et al. Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcomes in 23–25 week old gestation infants, 1990–1994 compared with 1984–1989. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 78: F99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintz, SR, Poole, WK, Fanaroff, AA, et al. Changes in mortality and morbidity among infants born at less than 25 weeks during the post-surfactant era. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F128–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, SR, Kendrick, , Vohr, BR, et al. Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18–22 months corrected age among infants born at less than 25 weeks gestation 1993–1999. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1645–51.Google Scholar
Vohr, BR, Wright, LL, Poole, SK, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants < 32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 635–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vohr, BR, Msall, ME, Wilson, D, et al. Spectrum of gross motor function in extremely low birth weight children with cerebral palsy at 18 months of age. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 123–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambalavanan, N, Nelson, KG, Alexander, G, et al. Prediction of neurologic morbidity in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2000; 20: 496–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pape, KE, Blackwell, RJ, Cusick, G, et al. Ultrasound detection of brain damage in preterm infants. Lancet 1979; 1: 1261–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovis, TL, Kuhn, LR. Real-time sonography of the brain through the anterior fontanelle. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 136: 277–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papile, , Burstein, J, Burstein, R, et al. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weight less than 1500 gm. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 529–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ancel, PY, Livinec, F, Larroque, B, et al. Cerebral palsy among very preterm children in relation to gestational age and neonatal ultrasound abnormalities: the EPIPAGE Cohort Study. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 828–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vries, LS, Haastert, IC, Rademaker, KJ, et al. Ultrasound abnormalities preceding cerebral palsy in high-risk preterm infants. J Pediatr 2004; 144: 815–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto-Martin, JA, Whitaker, AH, Felman, JF, et al. Relation of cranial ultrasound abnormalities in low-birthweight infants to motor or cognitive performance at 2, 6, and 9 years. Develop Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 826–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fily, A, Pierrat, V, Delporte, V, et al. Factors associated with neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years after very preterm birth: the population-based Nord-Pas-de-Calais EPIPAGE cohort. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 357–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiSalvo, DN. A new view of the neonatal brain: clinical utility of supplemental neurologic US imaging windows. RadioGraphics 2001; 21: 943–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limperopoulos, C, duPlessis, AJ. Disorders of cerebellar growth and development. Curr Opin Pediatr 2006; 18: 621–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limperopoulos, C, Bassan, H, Gauvreau, K, et al. Does cerebellar injury in premature infants contribute to the high prevalence of long-term cognitive, learning and behavioral disability in survivors? Pediatrics 2007; 120: 584–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrat, V, Duquennoy, C, Haastert, IC, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis and neurodevelopmental outcome of localized and extensive cystic periventricular leucomalacia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84: F151–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassan, H, Benson, C, Limperopoulos, C, et al. Ultrasonographic features and severity scoring of periventricular hemorrhagic infarction in relation to risk factors and outcome. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 2111–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassan, H, Limperopoulos, C, Visconti, K, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in survivors of periventricular hemorrhagic infarction. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 785–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laptook, AR, O'Shea, RM, Shankaran, S, et al. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: prevalence and antecedents. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 673–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holling, EE, Leviton, A. Characteristics of cranial US white matter echolucencies that predict disability: a review. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 136–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, MA. Patient preparation, safety, and hazards in imaging infants and children. In Rutherford, MA, ed., MRI of the Neonatal Brain. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2002: 3–15.Google Scholar
Rutherford, MA. Imaging the preterm infant: practical issues. In Rutherford, MA, ed. MRI of the Neonatal Brain. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2002: 17–21.Google Scholar
Bluml, S, Friedlich, P, Erberich, S, et al. MR imaging of newborns by using an MR-compatible incubator with integrated radiofrequency coils: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 231: 594–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirmiran, M, Barnes, PD, Keller, K, et al. Neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging before discharge is better than serial cranial ultrasound in predicting cerebral palsy in very low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 992–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, LJ, Anderson, PJ, Austin, NC, et al. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 685–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maalouf, EF, Duggan, PJ, Counsell, SJ, et al. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 719–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childs, AM, Cornette, L, Ramenghi, , et al. Magnetic resonance and cranial ultrasound characteristics of periventricular white matter abnormalities in newborn infants. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 647–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, SP, Cozzio, CC, Goldstein, RB, et al. Comparing the diagnosis of white matter injury in premature newborns with serial MR imaging and transfontanel ultrasonography findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1661–9.Google Scholar
Volpe, JJ. Cerebral white matter injury of the premature infant: more common than you think. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 176–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpe, JJ. Encephalopathy of prematurity includes neuronal abnormalities. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 221–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyet, , Kennea, N, Counsell, SJ, et al. Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial magnetic resonance imaging from birth and neurodevelopmental assessment. Pediatrics 2005; 118: 536–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inder, TE, Warfield, SK, Wang, H, et al. Abnormal cerebral structure is present at term in premature infants. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 286–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inder, TE, Huppi, PS, Warfield, S, et al. Periventricular white matter injury in the premature infant is followed by reduced cerebral cortical gray matter volume at term. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 755–60.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boardman, JP, Counsell, SJ, Rueckert, D, et al. Abnormal deep grey matter development following preterm birth detected using deformation-based morphometry. NeuroImage 2006; 32: 70–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, DK, Warfield, SK, Carlin, JB, et al. Perinatal risk factors altering regional brain structure in the preterm infant. Brain 2007; 130: 667–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, BS, Vohr, B, Staib, LH, et al. Regional brain volume abnormalities and long-term cognitive outcome in preterm infants. JAMA 2000; 284: 1939–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, BS, Anderson, AW, Ehrenkranz, R, et al. Regional brain volumes and their later neurodevelopmental correlates in term and preterm infants. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 939–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vries, L, Groenendaal, F, Haastert, IC, et al. Asymmetrical myelination of the posterior limb of the internal capsule in infants with periventricular haemorrhagic infarction: an early predictor of hemiplegia. Neuropediatrics 1999; 30: 314–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelants-van Rijn, AM, Groenendaal, F, Beek, FJA, et al. Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuropediatrics 2001; 32: 80–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sie, LTL, Knaap, MS, Wezel-Meijler, G, et al. Early MR features of hypoxic–ischemic brain injury in neonates with periventricular densities on sonograms. Am J Neuroradiol AJNR 2000; 21: 852–61.Google Scholar
Sie, LTL, Hart, AAM, Hof, J, et al. Predictive value of neonatal MRI with respect to late MRI findings and clinical outcome: a study in infants with periventricular densities on neonatal ultrasound. Neuropediatrics 2005; 36: 78–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ment, LR, Bada, HS, Barnes, P, et al. Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2002; 58: 1726–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rademaker, KJ, Uiterwaal, CSPM, Beek, FJA, et al. Neonatal cranial ultrasound versus MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome at school age in children born preterm. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F489–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Counsell, SJ, Dyet, L, Larkman, DJ, et al. Thalamo-cortical connectivity in children born preterm mapped using probabilistic magnetic resonance tractography. NeuroImage 2007; 34: 896–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Shea, TM, Doyle, LW. Perinatal glucocorticoid therapy and neurodevelopmental outcome: an epidemiologic perspective. Semin Neonatol 2001; 6: 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vieux, R, Fresson, J, Hascoet, JM, et al. Improving perinatal regionalization by predicting neonatal intensive care requirements of preterm infants: an EPIPAGE-based cohort study. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hintz, SR, Kendrick, , Vohr, BR, et al. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatrica 2006; 95: 1239–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, PJ, Doyle, LW. Cognitive and educational deficits in children born extremely preterm. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 51–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spittle, AJ, Orton, J, Doyle, LW, et al. Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (2): CD005495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, PJ, Doyle, LW. Neurodevelopmental outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol 2006; 30: 227–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, MC, Morris, BH, Wrage, , et al. Extremely low birth weight neonates with protracted ventilation: mortality and 18-month neurodevelopmental outcomes. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 798–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobaly, K, Schlucter, M, Minich, N, et al. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight and extremely low gestational age infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: effects of practice changes in 2000–2003. Pedatrics 2008; 121: 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baud, O. Postnatal steroid treatment and brain development. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: 96–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, BP, Inder, TE, Huppi, PS, et al. Impaired cerebral cortical gray matter growth after treatment with dexamethasone for neonatal chronic lung disease. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 217–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riva, MA, Fumagalli, F, Racagni, G. Opposite regulation of basic fibroblast growth factor and nerve growth factor gene expression in rat cortical astrocytes following dexamethasone administration. J Neurochem 1995; 64: 2526–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Postnatal corticosteroids to treat or prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 330–8.
Doyle, LW, Halliday, HL, Ehrenkranz, RA, et al. Impact of postnatal systemic corticosteroids on mortality and cerebral palsy in preterm infants: effect modification by risk for chronic lung disease. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 655–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watterberg, K. Postnatal steroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: where are we now? J Pediatr 2007; 150: 327–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams-Chapman, I, Stoll, BJ. Neonatal infection and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in the preterm infant. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006; 19: 290–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Adams-Chapman, I, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA 2004; 292: 2357–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hintz, SR, Kendrick, , Stoll, BJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants after necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 696–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haynes, RL, Borenstein, NS, DeSilva, TM, et al. Axonal development in the cerebral white matter of the human fetus and infant. J Comp Neurol 2005; 484: 156–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQuillen, PS, Sheldon, RA, Shatz, CJ, et al. Selective vulnerability of subplate neurons after early neonatal hypoxia–ischemia. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 3308–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, LW, VICS Group. Outcome at 5 years of age of children 23 to 27 weeks' gestation: refining the prognosis. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 134–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellon, RD, Simone, AF, Rappaport, BA. Use of anesthetic agents in neonates and young children. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 509–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikonomidou, C, Bosch, F, Miksa, M, et al. Blockade of NMDA receptors and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Science 1999; 283: 70–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, B, Asztalos, EV, Roberts, RS, et al. Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months. JAMA 2003; 289: 1124–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saigal, S, Doyle, LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet 2008; 371: 261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlow, N. Neurocognitive outcome after very preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89: F224–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, M, Flannery, DJ, Schluchter, M, et al. Outcomes in young adulthood for very low birth weight infants. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 149–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saigal, S, Hoult, , Streiner, DL, et al. School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 325–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, K, Ritari, N, Tommiska, V, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age of a national cohort of extremely low birth weight infants who were born in 1996–1997. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 1391–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlow, N, Wolke, D, Bracewell, M, et al. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 9–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hack, M, Taylor, HG, Drotar, D, et al. Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low birth weight in the 1990s. JAMA 2005; 294: 318–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, HG, Klein, N, Drotar, D, et al. Consequences and risk of < 1000 g birth weight for neuropsychological skills, achievement, and adaptive functioning. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2006; 27: 459–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, PJ, Doyle, LW, VICS Group. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA 2003; 289: 3264–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saigal, S, Tyson, J. Measurement of quality of life of survivors of neonatal intensive care: critique and implications. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×