Ackerman, Louise M. 1962. “Lady” as a Synonym for “Woman.”American Speech 37: 284–285.Google Scholar

Acocella, Joan. 2012. The English wars. New Yorker (May 14): 115–120.Google Scholar

Adams, Michael. 2008. Nicknames, Interpellation, and Dubya’s Theory of the State. Names 56: 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Michael 2009. Power, Politeness, and the Pragmatics of Nicknames. Names 57 (2): 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Michael 2012a. Lexicographical Description in a Culture of Correctness. Paper presented at Norma e uso nella lessicographia bilingue: XVI–XXI secolo, Universitá degli Studi di Catania, October 18–20.

Adams, Michael 2012b. Resources: Teaching Perspectives. In Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, vol. II, edited by Bergs, Alex and Brinton, Laurel, 1163–1178. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Alford, Henry. 1875 [1864]. The Queen’s English. 5th edn. London: Daldy, Isbister.Google Scholar

Alford, Henry. 2005. Not a word. New Yorker (August 29): 32.Google Scholar

Allan, Keith and Burridge, Kate. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, R. C. 1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Vol. I. English Grammars Written in English. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.Google Scholar

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn. 2000. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin.

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 5th edn. 2011. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2012. Variable Past-Tense Forms in Nineteenth-Century American English: Linking Normative Grammars and Language Change. American Speech 87 (3): 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anten, Todd. 2006. Self-Disparaging Trademarks and Social Change: Factoring the Reappropriation of Slurs into Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. Columbia Law Review 106: 388–434.Google Scholar

Ascham, Roger. 1570 [1863]. The Scholemaster. Ed. Mayor, John E. B.. London: Bell and Daldy.Google Scholar

Asim, Jabari. 2007. The N Word: Who Can Say It, Who Shouldn’t, and Why. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Auer, Anita and González-Díaz, Victorina. 2005. Eighteenth-century Prescriptivism in English: A Re-Evaluation of Its Effects on Actual Language Usage. Multilingua 24: 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Awkward, Michael. 2009. Burying Don Imus: Anatomy of a Scapegoat. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Richard W. 1991. Images of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Richard W. 2006. Talking about Split Infinitives. Michigan Today News-E (June). Google Scholar

Baldwin, Sandy. 2002. Purple Dotted Underlines: Microsoft Word and the End of Writing. Afterimage 30.1 (Jul/Aug): 6.Google Scholar

Balhorn, Mark. 2009. The Epicene Pronoun in Contemporary Newspaper Prose. American Speech 84(4): 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Charles. 1997. Early Modern English. Revised edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Barnbrook, Geoff. 2005. Johnson the Prescriptivist? The Case for the Prosecution. In Anniversary Essays on Johnson’s Dictionary, edited by Lynch, Jack and McDermott, Anne, 92–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, Dennis. 1982. Grammar and Good Taste: Reforming the American Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, Dennis 1986. Grammar and Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Battistella, Edwin L. 2005. Bad Language: Are Some Words Better than Others?New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas. 2002. A History of the English Language. 5th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Baugh, John. 1999. Out of the Mouths of Slaves: African American Language and Educational Malpractice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2009. Three Hundred Years of Prescriptivism (and Counting). In Current Issues in Late Modern English, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid and van der Wurff, William, 35–54. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C., Nocera, Carmela, and Sturiale, Massimo, eds. 2008. Perspectives on Prescriptivism. Bern: Peter Lang.

Beal, Joan C. and Sturiale, Massimo. 2008. Introduction. In Perspectives on Prescriptivism, edited by Beal, Joan C., Nocera, Carmela, and Sturiale, Massimo, 9–19. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Beam, Christopher. 2008. Epic Win: Goodbye, schadenfreude; hello, fail. Slate (October 15). .Google Scholar

Béjoint, Henri. 2010. The Lexicography of English: From Origins to Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Lerone 1967. What’s in a Name? Negro vs. Afro-American vs. Black. Ebony (November): 46–54.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Bloom, Ryan. 2012. Inescapably, You’re Judged by Your Language. New Yorker Page-Turner (May 29). Google Scholar

Blount, Roy. 2008. Alphabet Juice. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bradley, Mary O. 2008. Country rife with sloppy English. Ann Arbor News (March 12).

Brinton, Laurel J. and Arnovick, Leslie K.. 2011. The English Language: A Linguistic History. 2nd edn. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brontsema, Robin. 2004. A Queer Revolution: Reconceptualizing the Debate over Linguistic Reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics 17 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar

Cable, Thomas. 2008. History of the History of the English Language: How Has the Subject Been Studied? In A Companion to the History of the English Language, edited by Momma, Haruko and Matto, Michael, 11–17. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Campos, W. Brandon Lacy. 2003. Queer? Brown Tones: A Progressive Voice in Regressive Times (January 3).

Chapman, Don. 2008. The Eighteenth-century Grammarians as Language Experts. In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, 21–36. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chen, Melinda Yuen-Ching. 1998. “I Am an Animal!”: Lexical Reappropriation, Performativity, and Queer. In Engendering Communication: Proceedings from the Fifth Berkeley Women and Language Conference, edited by Wertheim, Suzanne, Bailey, Ashlee, and Corston-Oliver, Monica, 128–140. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. Spoken Standard English. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., 129–148. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Christian, Darrell, Jacobsen, Sally, and Minthorn, David, eds. 2012. Associated Press Stylebook 2012. New York: Associated Press.

Colin, Chris. 1999. The N-Word. Salon.com (November 8). .Google Scholar

Coote, Edmund. 1596. The English Schoole-maister. London: Printed by the Widow Orwin, for Ralph Jackson and Robert Dextar.Google Scholar

Crowley, Tony. 2008. Class, Ethnicity, and the Formation of Standard English. In A Companion to the History of the English Language, edited by Momma, Haruko and Matto, Michael, 303–312. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 1997. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 2004. The Stories of English. London: Lane.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 2006. The Fight for English: How Language Pundits Ate, Shot, and Left. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Curzan, Anne. 2000. Lexicography and Questions of Authority in the College Classroom. Dictionaries 21: 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curzan, Anne 2003. Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curzan, Anne 2009. Historical Corpus Linguistics and Evidence of Language Change. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, edited by Kytö, Merja and Lüdeling, Anke. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1091–1109.Google Scholar

Curzan, Anne and Adams, Michael. 2012. How English Works: A Linguistic Introduction. 3rd edn. (1st edn., 2006). New York: Pearson LongmanGoogle Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2007–. Time Magazine Corpus: 100 Million Words, 1920s–2000s. Available online at

Davies, Mark 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million Words, 1990–Present. Available online at

Davies, Mark 2010–. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 Million Words, 1810–2009. Available online at

Defoe, Daniel. 1697. An Essay upon Projects. London. The Stoke Newington Daniel Defoe Edition, edited by Kennedy, Joyce D. et al. New York: AMS, 1999.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques, 1969. The Ends of Man. Trans. Morot-Sir, Edouard et al. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (1): 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobrin, David N. 1990. A New Grammar Checker. Computers and the Humanities 24: 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DuBois, W. E. B. 1930. The Capital N. The Crisis (May): 172.Google Scholar

Ebony Magazine. 2007. Special Report: Who You Callin’ a. . . ? 62 (9) (July).

Edwards, John. 2012. Foreword: Language, Prescriptivism, Nationalism – and Identity. In The Languages of Nation: Attitudes and Norms, edited by Percy, Carol and Davidson, Mary Catherine, 11–36. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward. 1980. Attitudes Toward English Usage: A History of the War of Words. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward 1992. Style and Standardization in England: 1700–1900. In English in Its Social Contexts, edited by Machan, Tim W. and Scott, Charles T., 103–130. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward 2001. Usage. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume VI: English in North America, edited by Algeo, John, 358–421. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, John H. 1996. The Emergence of Standard English. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Susan 1998. The Commerce of Language in the Pursuit of Politeness in Eighteenth-century England. English Studies 79: 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, H. W. 1965 (reissued in 1996). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. 2nd edn., revised by Gowers, Ernest. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. W. and Fowler, F. G.. 1908. The King’s English. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Galinsky, Adam D., Hugenberg, Kurt, Groom, Carla, and Bodenhausen, Galen. 2003. The Reappropriation of Stigmatizing Labels: Implications for Social Identity. Research on Managing Groups and Teams 5: 221–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garner, Bryan. 1998. A Dictionary of Modern American Usage. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garner, Bryan 2005. Book Review: Don’t Know Much about Punctuation: Notes on a Stickler Wannabe: Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. By Truss, Lynne. Texas Law Review 83(5): 1443.Google Scholar

Gaudio, Rudolf P. 1994. Sounding Gay: Pitch Properties in the Speech of Gay and Straight Men. American Speech 69(1): 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilman, E. Ward, ed. 1994. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

González-Díaz, Victorina. 2008. On Normative Grammarians and the Double Marking of Degree. In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, 289–310. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew J. 2001. Small-Town Values and Big-City Vowels: A Study of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. Publication of the American Dialect Society 84. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred. 1989. Fifteenth-century English – Middle English or Early Modern English? In In Other Words: Transcultural Studies in Philology, Translation, and Lexicology Presented to Hans Heirich Meier on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, edited by Mackenize, J. Lachlan and Todd, Richard, 97–106. Dordrecht, Holland; Providence, RI: Fortis.Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred 1999. Regional and Social Variation. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: 1476–1776, edited by Lass, Roger, 459–538. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gorrell, Robert M. and Laird, Charlton G.. 1972. Modern English Handbook. 5th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Green, Jonathon. 1996. Chasing the Sun: Dictionary Makers and the Dictionaries They Made. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Green, Jonathon 1998. Cassell’s Dictionary of Slang. London: Orion.Google Scholar

Grossman, Ellie. 1997. The Grammatically Correct Handbook. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar

Haist, Caroline. 2000. An Evaluation of Microsoft Word 97’s Grammar Checker. Report: ED438538. Retrieved June 22, 2010 from ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE).

Halliday, Michael and Martin, J. R.. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Hartwell, Patrick. 1985. Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar. College English 47(2): 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hechtkopf, Kevin. 2010. Support for gays in the military depends on the question. CBS News (February 11).

Heidorn, George E. 2000. Intelligent Writing Assistance. In Handbook of Natural Language Processing, edited by Dale, Robert, Moisl, Hermann, and Somers, Harold, 181–207. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Hewitson, Michelle. 2004. Likeable defender of the commas. New Zealand Herald (September 4).

Hickey, Raymond. 2012. Standard English and the Standards of English. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World, edited by Hickey, Raymond, 2–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, Eric. 2007. Cornel West vs. Eric Michael Dyson: N-Word Debate Resurfaces. DiversityInc.

Hockett, Charles F. 1957. The Terminology of Historical Linguistics. Studies in Linguistics 12 (3–4): 57–73.Google Scholar

Hodson, Jane. 2006. The Problem of Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) Descriptivism. Historiographia Linguistica 33(2): 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hommerberg, Charlotte and Tottie, Gunnel. 2007. Try to or Try and? Verb Complementation in British and American English. ICAME Journal 31: 45–64.Google Scholar

Honnegger, Mark. 2005. English Grammar for Writing. New York; Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2005. A Student Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janda, Richard D. and Joseph, Brian D.. 2003. On Language, Change, and Language Change: Or, of History, Linguistics, and Historical Linguistics. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., 3–180. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Johnson, Eric. 1992. The Ideal Grammar and Style Checker. Text Technology 2 (4) (July): 3–4.Google Scholar

Johnson, Eric 1997. The Current State of Grammar and Style Checkers. Text Technology 7 (1): 18–21.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel. 1755. Dictionary of the English Language. London: Dodsley, Hitch, Mellar, Longman, and Knapton.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara, Andrus, Jennifer, and Danielson, Andrew E.. 2006. Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.”Journal of English Linguistics 34 (2): 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Richard Foster. 1953. Triumph of the English Language. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben. 1640 [1892]. Discoveries Made upon Men and Matter. Edited, with introduction and notes, by Schelling, Felix E.. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar

Kane, Eugene. 2006. The N-Word Has No Place in Schools. Journal Sentinel (November 25).

Kennedy, Arthur G. 1927. Hothouse Words versus Slang. American Speech 2(10): 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Janice. 2004. The inner nitpicker lashes’ out: just when you thought punctuation was a mute (moot) point, along comes Lynne Truss to champion it’s (its) return. Ottawa Citizen (May 2).

Kennedy, Randall. 1999–2000. Who Can Say “Nigger”? And Other Considerations. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 26: 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Randall 2002. Nigger: The Strange Career of a Troublesome Word. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 2004 [1975]. Language and Woman’s Place: Texts and Commentaries. Edited by Bucholtz, Mary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Landau, Sidney I. 2001. Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian, and Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, Harriet E. 1976. Girls, Ladies, or Women? The Unconscious Dynamics of Language Choice. Comprehensive Psychiatry 17(2): 295–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leonard, Arthur S. 2007. dykes on bikes Triumph on Trademark Appeal. cour

Liberman, Mark. 2012. Rules and “Rules.”Language Log (May 11). Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. (1st edn., 1997.) London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Livia, Anna and Hall, Kira, eds. 2007. Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London.Google Scholar

Lynch, Jack. 2009. The Lexicographer’s Dilemma. New York: Walker & Company.Google Scholar

McArthur, Tom. 1986. Worlds of Reference; Lexicography, Learning and Language from the Clay Tablet to the Computer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McArthur, Tom ed. 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1989. The Sexual (Re)Production of Meaning. In Language, Gender, and Professional Writing, edited by Frank, Francine W. and Treichler, Paula A., 35–50. New York: MLA.Google Scholar

McDermott, Anne. 2005. Johnson the Prescriptivist? The Case for the Defense. In Anniversary Essays on Johnson’s Dictionary, edited by Lynch, Jack and McDermott, Anne, 113–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McEnery, Tony. 2006. Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

McGee, Tim and Ericsson, Patricia. 2002. The Politics of the Program: MS Word as the Invisible Grammarian. Computers and Composition 19: 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machan, Tim. 2009. Language Anxiety: Conflict and Change in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McMahon, April. 1994. Understanding Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McWhorter, John. 1998. Word on the Street: Debunking the Myth of a “Pure” Standard English. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John 2008. Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold History of English. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John 2012. A Matter of Fashion. New York Times Opinionator (July 9). Google Scholar

Maggio, Rosalie. 1991. The Dictionary of Bias-Free Usage: A Guide to Nondiscriminatory Language. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.Google Scholar

Mair, G. H., ed. 1909. Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique, 1560. Oxford: Clarendon.

Marsh, George P. 1863. Lectures on the English Language. 4th edn. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar

Martin, , Ed. Review: All of Us. .

Menand, Louis. 2004. Bad comma: Lynne Truss’s strange grammar. New Yorker (June 28): 102–104.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Allan A. 2002. Predicting New Words: The Secrets of Their Success. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Allan A. 2004. Presidential Voices: Speaking Styles from George Washington to George W. Bush. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Michael, Ian. 1970. English Grammatical Categories and the Tradition to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Millar, Sharon. 1998. Language Prescription: A Success in Failure’s Clothing? In Historical Linguistics 1995: Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995, vol. II, edited by Hogg, Richard M. and Van Bergen, Linda, 177–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Millward, C. M and Hayes, Mary. 2012. A Biography of the English Language. 3rd edn. (1st edn., 1989; 2nd edn., 1996.) Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Milroy, James 1992. Linguistic Variation and Change: On the Historical Sociolinguistics of English. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, James 1999. The Consequences of Standardisation in Descriptive Linguistics. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., 16–39. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. 1991. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation. 2nd edn. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Milton, John. 1644. Areopagitica, at

Minkova, Donka. 2004. Philology, Linguistics, and the History of [hw] ~ [w]. In Studies in the History of the English Language II: Unfolding Conversations, edited by Curzan, Anne and Emmons, Kimberly, 7–46. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 1st edn., 1977. 2nd edn., 1984. 3rd edn., 1988. 4th edn., 1995. 5th edn., 1999. 6th edn., 2003. 7th edn., 2009. New York: Modern Language Association of America.

Moe, Albert F. 1963. “Lady” and “Woman”: The Terms’ Use in the 1880s. American Speech 38: 295.Google Scholar

Momma, Haruko and Matto, Michael. 2008. History, English, Language: Studying HEL Today. In A Companion to the History of the English Language, edited by Momma, Haruko and Matto, Michael, 3–10. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, Herbert C. 1994. The Story of Webster’s Third: Philip Gove’s Controversial Dictionary and Its Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mugglestone, Lynda, ed. 2006. The Oxford History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mullan, John. 2004. [features page] Guardian (London) (July 2): 4.Google Scholar

Murray, Lindley. 1795. English Grammar. York: Wilson, Spence and Mawman.Google Scholar

Negro, Black, and African American. Opinion. 1988. New York Times (December 22).

Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, eds. 1996. Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam; Atlanta: Rodopi.

Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stewart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Newman, Michael. 1997. Epicene Pronouns: The Linguistics of Prescriptive Problem. New York; London: Garland.Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1983. The Decline of Grammar. Atlantic Monthly (December): 31–46. Available at .Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey 2000. Usage in The American Heritage Dictionary. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn., xxvi–xxix. Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

O’Conner, Patricia and Kellerman, Stewart. 2009a. Origins of the Specious: Myths and Misconceptions of the English Language. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

O’Conner, Patricia and Kellerman, Stewart. 2009b. The I’s have it. New York Times (February 23).

Oxford English Dictionary, online. 1989 (2nd edn.), 2007 (new edn.). Oxford University Press.

Osselton, N. E. 1958. Branded Words in English Dictionaries before Johnson. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar

Pauwels, Anne. 1998. Women Changing Language. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Perales-Escudero, Moisés D. 2011. To Split or to Not Split: The Split Infinitive Past and Present. Journal of English Linguistics 39 (4): 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Percy, Carol. 2008. Mid-century Grammars and Their Reception in the Monthly Review and the Critical Review. In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, 125–142. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Percy, Carol and Davidson, Mary Catherine, eds. 2012. The Language of Nation: Attitudes and Norms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRef

Phillips, Edward. 1658. The New World of Words. London: Printed by E. Tyler, for Nath. Brooke.Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: W. Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, Steven 1999. Racist language, real and imagined. New York Times (February 2).

Pinker, Steven 2012. False Fronts in the Language Wars: Why New Yorker Writers and Others Keep Pushing Bogus Controversies. Slate (May 31). Google Scholar

Potter, Reva and Fuller, Dorothy. 2008. My New Teaching Partner? Using the Grammar Checker in Writing Instruction. English Journal 98: 36–41.Google Scholar

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA). 1st edn. (revised), 1967. 2nd edn., 1974. 3rd edn., 1983. 4th edn., 1994. 5th edn., 2001. 6th edn., 2010. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2009. 50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice. Chronicle of Higher Education (April 17). Google Scholar

Rahman, Jacquelyn. 2012. The N Word: Its History and Use in the African American Community. Journal of English Linguistics 40(2): 137–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang. 1994 (vol. I), 1997 (vol. II). Edited by Lighter, J. E.. New York: Random House.

Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. Historical Sociolinguistics. In Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, edited by Nevalainen, Terttu and Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, 11–37. Amsterdam; Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Read, Allen Walker. 2003. The Beginnings of English Lexicography. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of America 24: 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Read, Allen Walker 2002 [1986]. The Allegiance to Dictionaries in American Linguistic Attitudes. In Milestones in the History of English in America, edited by Bailey, Richard W., 110–120. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical Linguistics: Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rotello, Gabriel. 2000. Last Word: The Word that Failed. The Advocate (August 15).

Rothstein, Edward. 2000. Is a word’s definition in the mind of the user? New York Times (November 25).

Saussure, Ferdinand. 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Ed. Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert, with the collaboration of Riedlinger, Albert. Translated and annotated by Harris, Roy. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Schindler, Paul. 2003. Just How Queer Are We?Gay City News 2 (46) (November 13–19). Google Scholar

Shaughnessy, Mina P. 1977. Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teaching of Basic Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shellenbarger, Sue. 2012. This embarrasses you and I. Wall Street Journal (June 20).

Sims Holt, Grace. 1972. “Inversion” in Black Communication. In Rappin’ and Stylin’ Out: Communication in Urban Black America, edited by Kochman, Thomas, 152–159. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Skapinker, Michael. 2004. [no title] Financial Times (July 7): 10.

Skinner, David. 2012. The Story of Ain’t: America, Its Language, and the Most Controversial Dictionary Ever Published. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Sledd, James and Ebbitt, Wilma R.. 1962. Dictionaries and That Dictionary: A Casebook on the Aims of Lexicographers and the Targets of Reviewers. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy J. 1996. An Historical Study of English: Function, Form, and Change. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Tom W. 1992. Changing Racial Labels: From “Colored” to “Negro” to “Black” to “African American.”Public Opinion Quarterly 56 (4): 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smitherman, Geneva. 1991. “What Is Africa to Me?”: Language, Ideology, and African American. American Speech 66 (2): 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smitherman, Geneva 2006. Word from the Mother: Language and African Americans. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stanley, Julia P. 1970. Homosexual Slang. American Speech 45 (1/2): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strunk, William and White, E. B.. 1979. The Elements of Style. 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Swift, Jonathan. 1969. A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue. London, 1712, edited by Alston, R. C.. Menston, England: Scolar Press.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2012. That, which, zero: prescriptivist influences on English relativizer usage. Paper presented at the Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, May 9.

Thomas, George. 1991. Linguistic Purism. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. 2007. Language Contact and Deliberate Change. Journal of Language Contact 1 (Thema): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1982. Double Negation and Eighteenth-century English Grammars. Neophilologus 66 (2): 278–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2000. Female Grammarians of the Eighteenth Century. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics. Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2002. Robert Lowth and the Strong Verb System. Language Sciences 24 (3–4): 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2006. Eighteenth-century Prescriptivism and the Norm of Correctness. In The Handbook of the History of English, edited by van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou, 539–557. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2008a. The 1760s: Grammars, Grammarians and the Booksellers. In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, 101–124. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2008b. The Codifiers and the History of Multiple Negation in English, or Why Were 18th-century Grammarians So Obsessed with Double Negation? In Perspectives on Prescriptivism, edited by Beal, Joan C., Nocera, Carmela, and Sturiale, Massimo, 197–214. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2008c. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing: An Introduction. In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England, edited by van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon, 1–14. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid ed. 2008d. Grammars, Grammarians, and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2012. The Codification of English in England. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties around the World, edited by Hickey, Raymond, 33–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paola, Totaro. 1994. PC is a label to be worn with pride. Sydney Morning Herald (April 9).

Tottie, Gunnel. 2009. How Different Are American and British English Grammars? In One Language, Two Grammars?, edited by Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia, 341–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: What It Isn’t. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Bex, Tony and Watts, Richard J., 117–128. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Truss, Lynne. 2003. Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

Urban Dictionary.

van Gelderen, Elly. 2006. A History of the English Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vernon, Alex. 2000. Computerized Grammar Checkers 2000: Capabilities, Limitations, and Pedagogical Possibilities. Computers and Composition 17: 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vorlat, Emma. 1975. The Development of English Grammatical Theory, 1586–1737, with Special Reference to the Theory of Parts of Speech. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Waldren, Murray. 2004. That’s language. Weekend Australian (January 24): B09.Google Scholar

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language. 1961. Ed. Gove, Philip and others. Springfield, MA: G. and C. Merriam.

Weingarten, Gene. 2001. Below the beltway. Washington Post (April 22).

Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Martin. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, edited by Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y., 97–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Wiehl, Lisa. 2007. Stick and stones and the N-word. FoxNews.com (January 29).

Wild, Kate. 2009. Johnson’s Prescriptive Labels – A Reassessment. Dictionaries 30: 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Joseph M. 2005. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. 8th edn. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 1991. Dialects and American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt and Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2006. American English: Dialects and Variation. 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wood, Frederick T. 1962. Current English Usage: A Concise Dictionary. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Yagoda, Ben. 2007. When You Catch an Adjective, Kill It: The Parts of Speech, for Better and/or Worse. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2006. Prescriptivism and Preposition Stranding in Eighteenth-century Prose. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics. (> contents > articles).Google Scholar

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria 2008a. Preposition Stranding in the Eighteenth Century: Something to Talk about. In Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-century England, edited by Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, 251–277. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria 2008b. To End or Not to End a Sentence with a Preposition: An 18th-century Debate. In Perspectives on Prescriptivism, edited by Beal, Joan C., Nocera, Carmela, and Sturiale, Massimo, 237–264. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Zimmer, Ben. 2010. In Defense of Harding the Bloviator. Visual Thesaurus (July 29). Google Scholar

Zimmer, Ben 2012. How baseball gave us ‘jazz’: the surprising origins of a 100-year old word. Boston Globe (March 25).

Zimmer, Ben 2013. All the president’s words: whatever happened to our neologizers-in-chief?Boston Globe (January 20). Google Scholar