Abbe, E. C. (1935). Studies in the phylogeny of the Betulaceae I. Floral and inflorescence anatomy and morphology. Bot. Gaz. 95, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbe, E. C. (1938). Studies in the phylogeny of the Betulaceae II. Extremes in the range of variation of floral and inflorescence morphology. Bot. Gaz. 99, 431–69.Google Scholar

Abbe, E. C. (1974). Flowers and inflorescences of the ‘Amentiferae’. Bot. Rev. 40, 159–261.Google Scholar

Albert, V. A., Gustafsson, M. H. G. and Di Laurenzio, L. (1998). Ontogenetic systematics, molecular developmental genetics, and the Angiosperm petal. In Molecular systematics of plants II, DNA sequencing, ed. Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. and Doyle, J. J.. Boston: Kluwer Academic, pp. 349–74.Google Scholar

Albert, V. A., and Struwe, L. (2002). Gentianaceae in context. In Gentianaceae. Systematics and natural history, ed. Struwe, L. and Albert, V. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Álvarez-Buylla, E. R., Ambrose, B. A., Flores-Sandoval, E., Englund, M., Garay-Arroyo, A., Garcia-Ponce, B., de la Torre-Bárcena, E., Espinosa-Matías, S., Martínez, E., Piñero-Nelson, A., Engström, P. and Meyerowitz, E. M. (2010). B-function expression in the flower center underlies the homeotic phenotype of Lacandonia schismatica (Triuridaceae). Plant Cell 22, 3543–59.Google Scholar

Alverson, W. S., Karol, K. G., Baum, D. A., Chase, M. W., Swensen, S. M., McCourt, R. and Sytsma, K. J. (1998). Circumscription of the Malvales and relationships to other Rosidae, evidence from rbcL sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 85, 876–87.Google Scholar

Alverson, W. S., Whitlock, B. A., Nyffeler, R., Bayer, C. and Baum, D. A. (1999). Phylogeny of the core Malvales, evidence from ndhF sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 86, 1474–86.Google Scholar

Amara-Neto, L. P., Westerkamp, C. and Melo, G. A. R. (2015). From keel to inverted keel flowers: Functional morphology of ‘upside down’ papilionoid flowers and the behaviour of their bee visitors. Plant Syst. Evol. 301, 2161–78.Google Scholar

Ambrose, B. A., Espinosa-Matìas, S., Vásquez-Santana, S., Vergara-Silva, F., Martìnez, E., Márquez- Guzmán, J. and Alvarez-Buylla, E. R. (2006). Comparative developmental series of the Mexican Triurids support a euanthial interpretation for the unusual reproductive axes of Lacandonia schismatica (Triuridaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93, 15–35.Google Scholar

Anderberg, A. A., Rydin, C. and Källersjö, M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l., analysis of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Am. J. Bot. 89, 677–87.Google Scholar

Anderberg, A. A., and Ståhl, B. (1995). Phylogenetic interrelationships in the order Primulales, with special emphasis on the family circumscriptions. Can. J. Bot. 73, 1699–1730.Google Scholar

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group I (1998). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85, 531–53.Google Scholar

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II. (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants, APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141, 399–436.Google Scholar

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161, 105–21.Google Scholar

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181: 1–20.Google Scholar

Ao, C., and Tobe, H. 2015. Floral morphology and embryology of Helwingia (Helwingiaceae, Aquifoliales): Systematic and evolutionary implications. J. Plant Res. 128, 161–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Appel, O. (1996). Morphology and systematics of the Scytopetalaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121, 207–27.Google Scholar

Appleton, A. D., and Schenk, J. J. (2021). Evolution and development of staminodes in Paronychia (Caryophyllaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 182, 377–88.Google Scholar

Arber, A. (1925). Monocotyledons. A morphological study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arber, A. (1934). The Gramineae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arber, E. A. N., and Parkin, J. (1907). The origin of Angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 38, 29–80.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. E. (1985). The delimitation of Bignoniaceae and Scrophulariaceae based on floral anatomy, and the placement of problem genera. Am. J. Bot. 72, 755–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, J. E., and Douglas, A. W. (1989). The ontogenetic basis for corolla aestivation in Scrophulariaceae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 116, 378–89.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. E., and Tucker, S. C. (1986). Floral development in Myristica (Myristicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 73, 1131–43.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. E., and Wilson, T. K. (1978). Floral morphology of Horsfieldia (Myristicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 65, 441–9.Google Scholar

Bachelier, J. B., and Endress, P. K. (2007). Development of inflorescences, cupules, and flowers in Amphipterygium and comparison with Pistacia (Anacardiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 1237–53.Google Scholar

Bachelier, J. B., and Endress, P. K. (2009). Comparative floral morphology and anatomy of Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae (Sapindales), with a special focus on gynoecium structure and evolution. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 159, 499–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachelier, J. B., Endress, P. K., and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2011). Comparative floral structure and development of Nitrariaceae (Sapindales) and systematic implications. In Flowers on the tree of life, ed. Wanntorp, L. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backlund, M., Oxelman, B., and Bremer, B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1029–43.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1860). Observations organogéniques pour servir à l’histoire des Polygalées. Adansonia 1, 174–80.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1862). Organogénie florale des Cordiacées. Adansonia 3, 1–7.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1867–95). Histoire des plantes (13 vols.). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1868a). Monographie des Dilléniacées. In Histoire des Plantes I, 2. Paris: Hachette, pp. 89–132.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1868b). Monographie des Magnoliacées. In Histoire des Plantes I, 3. Paris: Hachette, pp. 133–92.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1868c). Monographie des Annonacées. In Histoire des plantes I, 4. Paris: Hachette, pp. 193–288.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1870). Monographie des Elaeagnacées. In Histoire des plantes II. Paris: Hachette, pp. 487–95.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1871a). Du genre Garcinia et de l’origine de la gomme-gutte. Adansonia 10, 283–98.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1871b). Observations sur les Rutacées. Adansonia 10, 299–333.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1874). Euphorbiacées. In Histoire des plantes V, 41. Paris: Hachette, pp. 105–76.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1876a). Traité du développement de la fleur et du fruit X. Castanéacées. Adansonia 12, 1–17.Google Scholar

Baillon, H. (1876b). Traité du développement de la fleur et du fruit. XVI. Stylidiées. Adansonia 12, 354–61.Google Scholar

Barabé, D., and Lacroix, C. (2000). Homeosis in Araceae flowers, the case of Philodendron melinonii. Ann. Bot. 86, 479–91.Google Scholar

Barroca, C. (2014). Floral development of Cuphea (Lythraceae): Understanding the origin of monosymmetry and the epicalyx in the flower. University of Edinburgh: Unpubl. MSc. Dissertation.Google Scholar

Bateman, R. M., Hilton, J. and Rudall, P. J. (2006). Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: Contrasting the ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. J. Exper. Bot. 57, 3471–3503.Google Scholar

Batenburg, L. H., and Moeliono, B. M. (1982). Oligomery and vasculature in the androecium of Mollugo nudicaulis Lam. (Molluginaceae). Acta Bot. Neerl. 31, 215–20.Google Scholar

Bauer, R. (1922). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Polygonaceenblüten. Flora 115, 273–92.Google Scholar

Bayer, C. (1999). The bicolor unit: Homology and transformation of an inflorescence structure unique to core Malvales. Plant Syst. Evol. 214, 187–98.Google Scholar

Bayer, C., Fay, M. F., De Bruijn, A., Savolainen, V., Morton, C. M., Kubitzki, K., Alverson, W. S. and Chase, M. W. (1999). Support for an expanded family concept of Malvaceae within a recircumscribed order Malvales, a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL DNA sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 129, 267–303.Google Scholar

Bayer, C., and Hoppe, J. R. (1990). Die Blütenentwicklung von Theobroma cacao L. (Sterculiaceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 65, 301–12.Google Scholar

Bayer, C., and Kubitzki, K. (2003). Malvaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants vol. V, ed. Kubitzki, K. and Bayer, C.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 225–311.Google Scholar

Bechtel, A. R. (1921). The floral anatomy of the Urticales. Am. J. Bot. 8, 386–410.Google Scholar

Behnke, H. D. (1999). P-type sieve-element plastids present in members of the tribes Triplareae and Coccolobeae (Polygonaceae) renew the links between the Polygonales and the Caryophyllales. Plant Syst. Evol. 214, 15–27.Google Scholar

Bello, M. A., Hawkins, J. A. and Rudall, P. J. (2007). Floral morphology and development in Quillajaceae and Surianaceae (Fabales), the species-poor relatives of Leguminosae and Polygalaceae. Ann. Bot. 100, 1491–1505.Google Scholar

Bello, M. A., Martínez-Asperilla, A. and Fuertes-Aguilar, J. (2016). Floral development of Lavatera trimestris and Malva hispanica reveals the nature of the epicalyx in the Malva generic alliance. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bello, M. A., Rudall, P. J., González, F. and Fernández-Alonso, J. L. (2004). Floral morphology and development in Aragoa (Plantaginaceae) and related members of the order Lamiales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 723–38.Google Scholar

Belsham, S. R., and Orlovich, D. A. (2003). Development of the hypanthium and androecium in Acmena smithii and Syzygium australe (Acmena alliance, Myrtaceae). Aust. Syst. Bot. 16, 621–8.Google Scholar

Bennek, C. (1958). Die morphologische Beurteilung der Staub- und Blumenblätter der Rhamnaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 77, 423–57.Google Scholar

Bensel, C. R., and Palser, B. F. (1975a). Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae sensu lato I. Introduction, Parnassioideae and Brexioideae. Am. J. Bot. 62, 176–85.Google Scholar

Bensel, C. R., and Palser, B. F. (1975b). Floral anatomy in the Saxifragaceae sensu lato II. Saxifragoideae and Iteoideae. Am. J. Bot. 62, 661–75.Google Scholar

Berger, A. (1930). Crassulaceae. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 18a, ed. Engler, A. and Prantl, K.. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 352–483.Google Scholar

Bernardello, G. (2007). A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In Nectaries and nectar, ed. Nicolson, S. W., Nepi, M. and Pacini, E.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 19–128.Google Scholar

Bernhard, A. (1999). Flower structure, development, and systematics in Passifloraceae and in Abatia (Flacourtiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160, 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhard, A., and Endress, P. K. (1999). Androecial development and systematics in Flacourtiaceae s.l. Plant Syst. Evol. 215, 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bittrich, V. (1993). Caryophyllaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants vol. II, ed. Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G. and Bittrich, V.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 206–36.Google Scholar

Bittrich, V., and Amaral, M. C. E. (1996). Flower morphology and pollination biology of Clusia species from the Gran Sabana (Venezuela). Kew Bull. 51, 681–94.Google Scholar

Bohte, A., and Drinnan, A. (2005). Floral development and systematic position of Arillastrum, Allosyncarpia, Stockwellia and Eucalyptopsis (Myrtaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 251, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boke, N. H. (1963). Anatomy and development of the flower and fruit of Pereskia pititache. Am. J. Bot. 50, 843–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boke, N. H. (1966). Ontogeny and structure of the flower and fruit of Pereskia aculeata. Am. J. Bot. 53, 534–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boraginales Working Group (2016). Familial classification of the Boraginales. Taxon 65, 502–22.Google Scholar

Bowman, J. L., and Smyth, D. R. (1998). Patterns of petal and stamen reduction in Australian species of Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159, 65–74.Google Scholar

Box, M. S., and Rudall, P. J. (2006). Floral structure and ontogeny in Globba (Zingiberaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 258, 107–22.Google Scholar

Brandbyge, J. (1993). Polygonaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants vol. II, ed. Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G., and Bittrich, V.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 531–44.Google Scholar

Bremer, K., Backlund, A., Sennblad, B., Swenson, U., Andreasen, K., Hjertson, M., Lundberg, J., Backlund, M. and Bremer, B. (2001). A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level morphological synapomorphies. Plant Syst. Evol. 229, 137–69.Google Scholar

Brett, J. F., and Posluszny, U. (1982). Floral development of Caulophyllum thalictroides (Berberidaceae). Can. J. Bot. 60, 2133–41.Google Scholar

Brockington, S. F., Dos Santos, P., Glover, B. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2013). Evolution of the androecium in Caryophyllales: Insights from a paraphyletic Molluginaceae. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1757–78.Google Scholar

Brockington, S. F., Roolse, A., Ramdial, J., Moore, M. J., Crawley, S., Dhingra, A. Hilu, K., Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S. (2009). Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: Revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 170, 627–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockington, S. F., Rudall, P. J., Frohlich, M. W., Oppenheimer, D. G., Soltis, P. S. and Soltis, D. E. (2012). ‘Living stones’ reveal alternative petal identity programs within the core eudicots. Plant J. 69, 193–203.Google Scholar

Brockington, S. F., Yang, Y., Gandia-Herrero, F., Covshoff, S., Hibberd, J. M., Sage, R. F., Wong, G. K. S., Moore, M. J. and Smith, S. A. (2015). Lineage-specific gene radiations underlie the evolution of novel betalain pigmentation in Caryophyllales. New Phytol. 207, 1170–80.Google Scholar

Brown, D. K., and Kaul, R. B. (1981). Floral structure and mechanism in Loasaceae. Am. J. Bot. 68, 361–72.Google Scholar

Brown, R. H., Nickrent, D. L. and Gasser, C. S. (2010). Expression of ovule and integument-associated genes in reduced ovules of Santalales. Evol. Dev. 12, 231–40.Google Scholar

Bukhari, G., Zhang, J., Stevens, P. F. and Zhang, W. (2017). Evolution of the process underlying floral zygomorphy development in pentapetalous angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 104, 1846–56.Google Scholar

Buendía-Monreal, M., and Gillmor, C. S. (2018). The times they are A-changin’: Heterochrony in plant development and evolution. Front. Plant Sci. 9,1349. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01349Google Scholar

Bull-Hereñu, K., and Ronse de Craene, L. P. (2020). Ontogenetic base for the variation of flowers in Malesherbia Ruiz & Pav. (Passifloraceae). Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 202. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00202Google Scholar

Bull-Hereñu, K., Ronse de Craene, L. P. and Pérez, F. (2018). Floral meristem size and organ number correlation in Eucryphia Cav. (Cunoniaceae). J. Plant Res. 131, 429–41.Google Scholar

Burtt, B. L., and Dickison, W. C. (1975). The morphology and relationships of Seemannaralia (Araliaceae). Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 33, 449–66.Google Scholar

Busch, A., and Zachgo, S. (2007). Control of corolla monosymmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16714–19.Google Scholar

Buxbaum, F. (1961). Vorlaüfige Untersuchungen über Umfang, systematische Stellung und Gliederung der Caryophyllales (Centrospermae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 36, 1–56.Google Scholar

Buzgo, M. (2001). Flower structure and development of Araceae compared with Alismatids and Acoraceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzgo, M., Chanderbali, A. S., Kim, S., Zheng, Z., Oppenheimer, D. G., Soltis, P. S. and Soltis, D. E. (2007). Floral developmental morphology of Persea Americana (avocado, Lauraceae), the oddities of staminate organ identity. Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 261–84.Google Scholar

Buzgo, M., and Endress, P.K. (2000). Floral structure and development of Acoraceae and its systematic relationships with basal Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 23–41.Google Scholar

Buzgo, M., Soltis, P. S. and Soltis, D. E. (2004). Floral developmental morphology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 925–47.Google Scholar

Buzgo, M., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Kim, S., Ma, H., Hauser, B. A., Leebens-Mack, J. and Johansen, B. (2006). Perianth development in the basal monocot Triglochin maritima (Juncaginaceae). Aliso 22, 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byng, J. W. (2014). The flowering plants handbook. A practical guide to families and genera of the world. Hertford: Plant Gateway.Google Scholar

Caddick, L. R., Rudall, P. J. and Wilkin, P. (2000). Floral morphology and development in Dioscoreales. Feddes Repert. 111, 189–230.Google Scholar

Cano Niklitschek, M. J. (2012). Evolution of the nectaries in the Primuloid clade (Ericales). Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Unpublished master’s thesis.Google Scholar

Cantino, P. D. (1992). Evidence for a polyphyletic origin of the Labiatae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79, 361–79.Google Scholar

Cao, L.-M., Liu, J., Lin, Q., Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2018). The floral organogenesis of Koelreuteria bipinnata and its variety K. bipinnata var. integrifolia (Sapindaceae): Evidence of floral constraints on the evolution of monosymmetry. Plant Syst. Evol. 304, 923–35.Google Scholar

Cao, L.-M., Newman, M., Kirchoff, B., Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2019). Develomental evidence helps resolve the evolutionary origins of anther appendages in Globba. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 189, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cao, L.-M., Ronse De Craene, L. P., Wang, Z.-X. and Wang, Y.-H. (2017). The floral organogenesis of Eurycorymbus cavaleriei (Sapindaceae) and its systematic implications. Phytotaxa 297, 234–44.Google Scholar

Caris, P. (2013). Bloemontogenetische patronen in the Ericales sensu lato. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium: Unpubl. Doctoral Thesis.Google Scholar

Caris, P. L., Geuten, K. P., Janssens, S. B. and Smets, E. F. (2006). Floral development in three species of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 93, 1–14.Google Scholar

Caris, P., Ronse De Craene, L. P. Smets, E. F. and Clinckemaillie, D. (2000). Floral development of three Maesa species, with special emphasis on the position of the genus within Primulales. Ann. Bot. 86, 87–97.Google Scholar

Caris, P. and Smets, E. F. (2004). A floral ontogenetic study on the sister group relationship between the genus Samolus (Primulaceae) and the Theophrastaceae. Am. J. Bot. 91, 627–43.Google Scholar

Caris, P., Smets, E. F., De Coster, K. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2006). Floral ontogeny of Cneorum tricoccon L. (Rutaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 257, 223–32.Google Scholar

Carolin, R. C. (1960). Floral structure and anatomy in the family Stylidiaceae Swartz. P. Linn. Soc. N. S. W. 85, 189–96.Google Scholar

Carolin, R. C. (1993). Portulacaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants vol. II, ed. Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G. and Bittrich, V.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 544–55.Google Scholar

Carrive, L., Domenech, B., Sauquet, H., Jabbour, F., Damerval, C. and Nadot, S. (2020). Insights into the ancestral flowers of Ranunculales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 194, 23–46.Google Scholar

Carrucan, A. E., and Drinnan, A. N. (2000). The ontogenetic basis for floral diversity in the Baeckea sub-group. Kew Bull. 55, 593–613.Google Scholar

Cavalari De-Paula, O., Assis, L. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2018). Unbuttoning the ancestral flower of angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 551–4.Google Scholar

Cavalari De-Paula, O., das Graças Sajo, M., Prenner, G., Cordeiro, I. and Rudall, P.J. (2011). Morphology, development and homologies of the perianth and floral nectaries in Croton and Astraea (Euphorbiaceae – Malpighiales). Plant Syst. Evol. 292, 1–14.Google Scholar

Chakravarty, M. L. (1958). Morphology of the staminate flowers in the Cucurbitaceae with special reference to the evolution of the stamens. Lloydia 21, 49–87.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. A. (1991). Studies in the Alismataceae. IX. Development of the flower in Ranalisma humile. Can. J. Bot. 69, 2790–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlton, W. A. (1999a). Studies in the Alismataceae. X. Floral organogenesis in Luronium natans (L.) Raf. Can. J. Bot. 77, 1560–8.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. A. (1999b). Studies in the Alismataceae. XI. Development of the inflorescence and flowers of Wiesneria triandra (Dalzell) Micheli. Can. J. Bot. 77, 1569–79.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. A. (2004). Studies in the Alismataceae. XII. Floral organogenesis in Damasonium alisma and Baldellia ranunculoides, and comparisons with Butomus umbellatus. Can. J. Bot. 82, 528–39.Google Scholar

Chartier, M., Jabbour, F., Gerber, S., Mitteroecker, P., Sauquet, H., Von Balthazar, M., Staedler, Y., Crane, P. R. and Schönenberger, J. (2014). The floral morphospace: A modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution. New Phytol. 204, 841–53.Google Scholar

Chen, L., Ren, Y., Endress, P. K., Tian, X. H. and Zhang, X. H. (2007). Floral organogenesis in Tetracentron sinense (Trochodendraceae) and its systematic significance. Plant Syst. Evol. 264, 183–93.Google Scholar

Chinga, J., and Pérez, F. (2016). Ontogenetic integration in two species of Schizanthus (Solanaceae): A comparison with static integration patterns. Flora 22, 75–81.Google Scholar

Chinga, J., Pérez, F. and Claßen-Bockhoff, R. (2021). The role of heterochrony in Schizanthus flower evolution: A quantitative analysis. Perspect. Plant Ecol. 49, 12559. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2021.125591Google Scholar

Christenhusz, M. J. M., Brockington, S. F., Christin, P.-A. and Sage, R. F. (2014). On the disintegration of Molluginaceae: A new genus and family (Kewa, Kewaceae) segregated from Hypertelis, and placement of Macarthuria in Macarthuriaceae. Phytotaxa 181, 238–42.Google Scholar

Church, A. H. (1908). Types of floral mechanism. A selection of diagrams and descriptions of common flowers. Part I. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Citerne, H., Jabbour, F., Nadot, S. and Damerval, C. (2010). The evolution of floral symmetry. In Advances in botanical research, ed. Kader, J. C. and Delseny, M.. London: Elsevier, pp. 85–137.Google Scholar

Citerne, H. L., Pennington, R. T. and Cronk, Q. C. B. (2006). An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12017–20.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R. (1990). Pattern analysis in pseudanthia. Plant Syst. Evol. 171, 57–88.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R. (2016). The shoot concept of the flower: Still up to date? Flora 221, 46–53.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R., and Arndt, M. (2018). Flower-like heads from flower-like meristems: Pseudanthium development in Davidia involucrata (Nyssaceae). J. Plant Res. 131, 443–58.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R., and Bull-Hereñu, K. (2013). Towards an ontogenetic understanding of inflorescence diversity. Ann. Bot. 112, 1523–42.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R., and Frankenhäuser, H. (2020). The ‘male flower’ of Ricinus communis (Euphorbiaceae) interpreted as a multi-flowered unit. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8: 313. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00313Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R., and Heller, A. (2006). Floral synorganization and secondary pollen presentation in four Marantaceae from Costa Rica. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 745–60.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R. and Meyer, C. (2016). Space matters: Meristem expansion triggers corona formation in Passiflora. Ann. Bot. 117, 277–90.Google Scholar

Claßen-Bockhoff, R., Wester, P. and Tweraser, E. (2003). The staminal lever mechanism in Salvia L. (Lamiaceae): A review. Plant Biol. 5, 33–41.Google Scholar

Clinckemaillie, D., and Smets, E. F. (1992). Floral similarities between Plumbaginaceae and Primulaceae, systematic significance. Belg. J. Bot. 125, 151–3.Google Scholar

Cocucci, A. E., and Anton, A. M. (1988). The grass flower, suggestions on its origin and evolution. Flora 181, 353–62.Google Scholar

Coen, E. S., and Meyerowitz, E. M. (1991). The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31–7.Google Scholar

Cook, C. D. K. (1998). Hydrocharitaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants Vol. IV, ed. Kubitzki, K.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 234–48.Google Scholar

Copeland, H. F. (1963). Structural notes on hollies (Ilex aquifolium and I. cornuta, family Aquifoliaceae). Phytomorphology 13, 455–64.Google Scholar

Costello, A., and Motley, T. J. (2004). The development of the superior ovary in Tetraplasandra (Araliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91, 644–55.Google Scholar

Couvreur, T. L. P., Richardson, J. E., Sosef, M. S. M., Erkens, R. H. J. and Chatrou, L. W. (2008). Evolution of syncarpy and other morphological characters in African Annonaceae: A posterior mapping approach. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 47, 302–18.Google Scholar

Cox, C. D. K. (1998). Hydrocharitaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. IV, ed. Kubitzki, K.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 234–48.Google Scholar

Crane, P. R., Friis, E. M. and Pedersen, K. R. (1994). Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of magnoliid Angiosperms. Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl. 8, 51–72.Google Scholar

Crepet, W. L. (2008). The fossil record of Angiosperms: Requiem or renaissance? Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 95, 3–33.Google Scholar

Crepet, W. L., Nixon, K. C. and Weeks, A. (2018). Mid-Cretaceous angiosperm radiation and an asteroid origin of bilaterality: diverse and extinct ‘Ericales’ from New Jersey. Am. J. Bot. 105, 1412–23.Google Scholar

Cronk, Q. C. B., Needham, I. and Rudall, P. J. (2015). Evolution of catkins: Inflorescence morphology of selected Salicaceae in an evolutionary and developmental context. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 1030. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01030Google Scholar

Cronquist, A. (1981). An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Cuénoud, P., Savolainen, V., Chatrou, L. W., Powell, M., Grayer, R. J. and Chase, M. W. (2002). Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 89, 132–44.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, R. (1975). A system of classification of the Angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not. 128, 119–47.Google Scholar

Dahgren, R. (1983). General aspects of Angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nord. J. Bot. 3, 119–49.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, R., Clifford, T. H. and Yeo, P. (1985). The families of the monocotyledons. Structure, evolution and taxonomy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, R., and Thorne, R. F. (1984). The order Myrtales: Circumscription, variation and relationships. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 71, 633–99.Google Scholar

D’Arcy, W. G. (1986). The calyx in Lycianthes and some other genera. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 73, 117–27.Google Scholar

Dawson, M. L. 1936. The floral morphology of the Polemoniaceae. Am. J. Bot. 23, 501–11.Google Scholar

de Barros, T. C., Pedersoli, G. D., Paulino, J. V. and Teixeira, S. P. (2017). In the interface of caesalpinioids and mimosoids: Comparative floral development elucidates shared characters in Dimorphandra mollis and Pentaclethra macroloba (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 104, 218–32.Google Scholar

de Laet, J., Clinckemaillie, D., Jansen, S. and Smets, E. F. (1995). Floral ontogeny in the Plumbaginaceae. J. Plant Res. 108, 289–304.Google Scholar

de Maggio, A. E., and Wilson, C. L. (1986). Floral structure and organogenesis in Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 73, 21–32.Google Scholar

de Menezes, N. L. (1980). Evolution in Velloziaceae, with special reference to androecial characters. In Petaloid monocotyledons, ed. Brickell, C. D., Cutler, D. F. and Gregory, M.. Hortic. and Botan. Research. Linnean Soc. Symposium Series 8. London: Academic Press, pp. 117–38.Google Scholar

de Olivera Franca, R. and Cavalari De-Paula, O. (2017). Embryology of Pera (Peraceae, Malpighiales): Systematics and evolutionary implications. J. Plant Res. 130, 709–21.Google Scholar

Deroin, T. (1985). Contribution à la morphologie comparée du gynécée des Annonaceae: Monodoroideae. Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (Paris) Sér. IV, 7, 167–76.Google Scholar

Deroin, T. (1997). Confirmation and origin of the paracarpy in Annonaceae, with comments on some methodological aspects. Candollea 52, 45–58.Google Scholar

Deroin, T. (2000). Floral anatomy of Toussaintia hallei Le Thomas, a case of convergence of Annonaceae with Magnoliaceae. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Family Magnoliaceae, ed. Liu, Y.-H., Fan, H.-M., Chen, Z.-Y., Wu, Q.-G. and Zeng, Q.-W.. Beijing: Science Press, pp. 168–76.Google Scholar

Deroin, T. (2007). Floral vascular pattern of the endemic Malagasy genus Fenerivia Diels (Annonaceae). Adansonia Sér. 3, 29, 7–12.Google Scholar

Deroin, T. (2010). Floral anatomy of Magnolia decidua (Q. Y. Zheng) V. S. Kumar (Magnoliaceae): Recognition of a partial pentamery. Adansonia Sér. 3, 32, 39–55.Google Scholar

Deroin, T., and Le Thomas, A. (1989). Sur la systématique et les potentialités évolutives des Annonacées: cas d’Ambavia gerrardii (Baill.) Le Thomas, espèce endémique de Madagascar. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris t. 309 , Sér. III, 647–52.Google Scholar

Derstine, K. S., and Tucker, S. C. (1991). Organ initiation and development of inflorescences and flowers of Acacia baileyana. Am. J. Bot. 78, 816–32.Google Scholar

de Wilde, W. J. J. O. (1974). The genera of tribe Passifloreae (Passifloraceae) with special reference to flower morphology. Blumea 22, 37–50.Google Scholar

Dickison, W. C. (1970). Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae VI. Stamens and young stem. J. Arnold Arbor. 51, 403–18.Google Scholar

Dickison, W. C. (1972). Observations on the floral morphology of some species of Saurauia, Actinidia and Clematoclethra. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 88, 43–54.Google Scholar

Dickison, W. C. (1975). Studies on the floral anatomy of the Cunoniaceae. Am. J. Bot. 62, 433–47.Google Scholar

Dickison, W. C. (1978). Comparative anatomy of Eucryphiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 65, 722–35.Google Scholar

Dickison, W.C. (1986). Floral morphology and antomy of Staphyleaceae. Bot. Gaz. 147, 312–26.Google Scholar

Dickison, W. C. (1993). Floral anatomy of the Styracaceae, including observations on intra-ovarian trichomes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 112, 223–55.Google Scholar

Dilcher, D. L. (2000). Toward a new synthesis, major evolutionary trends in the Angiosperm fossil record. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7030–6.Google Scholar

Donoghue, M. J., Bell, C. D. and Winkworth, R. C. (2003). The evolution of reproductive characters in Dipsacales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S453–S464.Google Scholar

Donoghue, M. J., Ree, R. H. and Baum, D. A. (1998). Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sc. 3, 311–17.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. W., and Tucker, S. C. (1996a). Comparative floral ontogenies among Persoonioideae including Bellendena (Proteaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83, 1528–55.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. W., and Tucker, S. C. (1996b). Inflorescence ontogeny and floral organogenesis in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae), with emphasis on the nature of the flower pairs. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 341–72.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. W., and Tucker, S. C. (1996c). The developmental basis of diverse carpel orientations in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 157, 373–97.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. W., and Tucker, S. C. (1997). The developmental basis of morphological diversification and synorganization in flowers of Conospermeae (Stirlingia and Conosperminae, Proteaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 158, S13–S48.Google Scholar

Doust, A. N. (2002). Comparative floral ontogeny in Winteraceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 87, 366–79.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. A. (2008). Integrating molecular phylogenetic and paleobotanical evidence on origin of the flower. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 816–43.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. A., and Endress, P. K. (2000). Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal Angiosperms, comparison and combination with molecular data. Int. J Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S121–S153.Google Scholar

Doyle, J. A., and Endress, P. K. (2011). Tracing the early evolutionary diversification of the angiosperm flower. In Flowers on the tree of life, ed. Wanntorp, L. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–119.Google Scholar

Drinnan, A. N., and Ladiges, P. Y. (1989). Corolla and androecium development in some Eudesmia eucalypts (Myrtaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 165, 239–54.Google Scholar

Eames, A. J. (1961). Morphology of the Angiosperms. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar

Eckert, G. (1966). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und blütenanatomische Untersuchungen zum Problem der Obdiplostemonie. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 85, 523–604.Google Scholar

Eckardt, T. (1937). Untersuchungen über Morphologie, Entwicklungsgeschichte und systematische Bedeutung des pseudomonomeren Gynoeceums. Nova Acta Leopold. N. F. 5, 1–112.Google Scholar

Eckardt, T. (1974). Vom Blütenbau der Centrospermen-Gattung Lophiocarpus Turcz. Phyton (Austria) 16: 1–4.Google Scholar

Ecklund, H. (2000). Lauraceous flowers from the Late Cretaceous of North Carolina, U.S.A. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 132, 397–428.Google Scholar

Edgell, T. (2004). Floral studies of Brexia madagascariensis Thouars (Celastraceae). UK: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh: Unpubl. MSc thesis.Google Scholar

Eichler, A. W. (1875). Blüthendiagramme vol. I. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar

Eichler, A. W. (1878). Blütendiagramme vol. II. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar

El, E. S., Remizowa, M. V. and Sokoloff, D. D. (2020). Developmental flower and rhizome morphology in Nuphar (Nymphaeales): An interplay of chaos and stability. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 303. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00303Google Scholar

Eliasson, U. H. 1988. Floral morphology and taxonomic relations among the genera of Amaranthaceae in the New World and the Hawaiian Islands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96, 235–83.Google Scholar

El Ottra, J. H. L., Demarco, D. and Pirani, J. R. (2019). Comparative floral structure and evolution in Galipeinae (Galipeeae: Rutaceae) and its implications at different systematic levels. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 191, 30–101.Google Scholar

El Ottra, J. H. L., Mello-de-Pina, G. F. de A., Demarco, D., Pirani, J. R. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2022). Gynoecium structure in Sapindales: A review of selected features and a case study of Trichilia pallens C. DC. (Meliaceae). J. Plant. Res.Google Scholar

El Ottra, J. H. L., Pirani, J. R. and Endress, P. K. (2013). Fusion within and between whorls of floral organs in Galipeinae (Rutaceae): Structural features and evolutionary implications. Ann. Bot. 111, 821–37.Google Scholar

Endress, M. E., and Bittrich, V. (1993). Molluginaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. II, ed. Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G. and Bittrich, V., Berlin: Springer, pp. 419–26.Google Scholar

Endress, M. E., Sennblad, B., Nilsson, S., Civeyrel, L., Chase, M. W., Huysmans, S., Grafström, E. and Bremer, B. (1996). A phylogenetic analysis of Apocynaceae s.str. and some related taxa in Gentianales, a multidisciplinary approach. Opera Bot. Belg. 7, 59–102.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1967). Systematische Studien über die verwandschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87, 431–525.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1976). Die Androeciumanlage bei polyandrischen Hamamelidaceen und ihre systematische Bedeutung. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 97, 436–57.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1977). Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales-Fagales group. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 1, 321–47.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1978). Blütenontogenese, Blütenabgrenzung und Systematische Stellung der perianthlosen Hamamelidoideae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 100, 249–317.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1980a). Ontogeny, function and evolution of extreme floral construction in Monimiaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 134, 79–120.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1980b). The reproductive structures and systematic position of the Austrobaileyaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 101, 393–433.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1984). The role of inner staminodes in the floral display of some relic Magnoliales. Plant Syst. Evol. 146, 269–82.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1986). Floral structure, systematics, and phylogeny in Trochodendrales. Ann. Mo Bot. Gard. 73, 297–324.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1987). Floral phyllotaxis and floral evolution. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108, 417–38.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1989). Chaotic floral phyllotaxis and reduced perianth in Achlys (Berberidaceae). Bot. Acta 102, 159–63.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1990). Patterns of floral construction in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39, 153–75.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1992). Evolution and floral diversity, the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153, S106–S122.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1994). Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1995a). Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. In Monocotyledons, systematics and evolution, ed. Rudall, P. J., Cribb, D. F. and Humphries, C. J.. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, pp. 43–79.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1995b). Floral structure and evolution in Ranunculanae. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9, 47–61.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1997). Relationships between floral organization, architecture, and pollination mode in Dillenia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 206, 99–118.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1998). Antirrhinum and Asteridae: Evolutionary changes of floral symmetry. Soc. Exp. Biol. Sem. Ser. 51, 133–40.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (1999). Symmetry in flowers: Diversity and evolution. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160 (6 Suppl.), S3–S23.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2001). The flower in extant basal Angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162, 1111–40.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2003a). Morphology and Angiosperm systematics in the molecular era. Bot. Rev. 68, 545–70.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2003b). Early floral development and nature of the calyptra in Eupomatiaceae (Magnoliales). Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 489–503.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2006). Angiosperm floral evolution, morphological developmental framework. Adv. Bot. Res. 44, 1–61.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2008a). My favourite flowering image. J. Exper. Bot. FNL 2008: 1–3.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2008b). The whole and the parts, relationships between floral architecture and floral organ shape, and their repercussions on the interpretation of fragmentary floral fossils. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 95, 101–20.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2008c). Perianth biology in the basal grade of extant angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 844–62.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2010a). Synorganisation without organ fusion in the flowers of Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae) and its not so trivial obdiplostemony. Ann. Bot. 106, 687–95.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2010b). Disentangling confusions in inflorescence morphology: Patterns and diversity of reproductive shoot ramification in angiosperms. J. Syst. Evol. 48, 225–39.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2011). Evolutionary diversification of the flowers in angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 98, 370–96.Google Scholar

Endress, P.K. (2012). The immense diversity of floral monosymmetry and asymmetry across angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 78, 345–97.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2014). Multicarpellate gynoecia in angiosperms: Occurrence, development, organization and architectural constraints. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 174, 1–43.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2016). Development and evolution of extreme synorganization in angiosperm flowers and diversity: A comparison of Apocynaceae and Orchidaceae. Ann. Bot. 117, 749–67.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K. (2019). The morphological relationship between carpels and ovules in angiosperms: Pitfalls of morphological interpretation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 189, 201–27.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., Davis, C. C. and Matthews, M. L. (2013) Advances in the floral structural characterization of the major subclades of Malpighiales, one of the largest orders of flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 111, 969–85.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Doyle, J. A. (2007). Floral phyllotaxis in basal Angiosperms, development and evolution. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 52–7.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Doyle, J. A. (2009). Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. Am. J. Bot. 96, 22–66.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Doyle, J. A. (2015). Ancestral traits and specializations in the flowers of the basal grade of living angiosperms. Taxon 64, 1093–1116.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Hufford, L. D. (1989). The diversity of stamen structures and dehiscence patterns among Magnoliidae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 100, 45–85.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Igersheim, A. (1997). Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the Laurales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125, 93–168.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Igersheim, A. (2000a). Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S211–S223.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Igersheim, A. (2000b). The reproductive structures of the basal Angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S237–S248.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., Jenny, M. and Fallen, M. (1983). Convergent elaboration of apocarpous gynoecia in higher advanced dicotyledons. Nord. J. Bot. 3, 293–300.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Lorence, D. H. (2004). Heterodichogamy of a novel type in Hernandia (Hernandiaceae) and its structural basis. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 753–63.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Matthews, M. L. (2006a). First steps towards a floral structural characterization of the major Rosid subclades. Plant Syst. Evol. 260, 223–51.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Matthews, M. L. (2006b). Elaborate petals and staminodes in eudicots, diversity, function, and evolution. Org. Div. Evol. 6, 257–93.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Matthews, M. L. (2012). Progress and problems in the assessment of flower morphology in higher-level systematics. Plant Syst. Evol. 298, 257–76.Google Scholar

Endress, P. K., and Rapini, A. (2014). Floral structure of Emmotum (Icacinaceae sensu stricto or Emmotaceae), a phylogenetically isolated genus of lamiids with a unique pseudotrimerous gynoecium, bitegmic ovules and monosporangiate thecae. Ann. Bot. 114, 945–59.Google Scholar

Engler, A., and Krause, K. (1935). Loranthaceae. In Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 16b, ed. Engler, A. and Prantl, K.. 2nd edn. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 98–203.Google Scholar

Engler, A., and Prantl, K., eds. (1887–1909). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien I–IV, Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (1986). Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der spiraligen Blüte von Stewartia pseudocamellia (Theaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 106, 391–407.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (1991). Sympetaly: A systematic character? Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 112, 417–51.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (1992). Floral development of two species of Stylidium (Stylidiaceae) and some remarks on the systematic position of the family Stylidiaceae. Can. J. Bot. 70, 258–71.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (1993). Studies on the floral development and pollen presentation in Acicarpha tribuloides with a discussion of the systematic position of the family Calyceraceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 115, 325–50.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (1994). Contributions to the affinities of Adoxa from the viewpoint of floral development. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116, 259–82.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (1998). Coenokarpie ohne und mit Compitum, ein Vergleich der Gynoeceen von Nigella (Ranunculaceae) and Geranium (Geraniaceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 71, 13–39.Google Scholar

Erbar, C. (2014) Nectar secretion and nectaries in basal angiosperms, magnoliids and non-core eudicots and a comparison with core eudicots. Plant Div. Evol. 131 /2, 63–143.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., Kusma, S. and Leins, P. (1998). Development and interpretation of nectary organs in Ranunculaceae. Flora 194, 317–32.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1981). Zur spirale in Magnolienblüten. Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. 56, 225–41.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1983). Zur sequenz von Blütenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103, 433–49.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1985). Studien zur Organsequenz in Apiaceen-Blüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 105, 379–400.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1988a). Blütenentwicklungsgeschichtliche Studien an Aralia und Hedera (Araliaceae). Flora 180, 391–406.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1988b). Studien zur Blütenentwicklung und Pollenpräsentation bei Brunonia australis Smith (Brunoniaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 110, 263–82.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1989). On the early floral development and the mechanisms of secondary pollen presentation in Campanula, Jasione and Lobelia. Bot. Jarhb. Syst. 111, 29–55.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1994). Flowers in Magnoliidae and the origin of flowers in other subclasses of the Angiosperms. I. The relationships between flowers of Magnoliidae and Alismatidae. Plant Syst. Evol., suppl. 8, 193–208.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1995a). An analysis of the early floral development of Pittosporum tobira (Thunb.) Aiton and some remarks on the systematic position of the family Pittosporaceae. Feddes Repert. 106, 463–73.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1995b). Portioned pollen release and the syndromes of secondary pollen presentation in the Campanulales-Asterales-complex. Flora 190, 323–38.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (1997). Different patterns of floral development in whorled flowers, exemplified by Apiaceae and Brassicaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158 (Suppl. 6), S49–S64.Google Scholar

Erbar, C., and Leins, P. (2011). Synopsis of some important, non-DNA character states in the Asterids with special reference to sympetaly. Plant Div. Evol. 129, 93–123.Google Scholar

Ernst, W. R. (1967). Floral morphology and systematics of Platystemon and its allies Hesperomecon and Meconella (Papaveraceae, Platystemonoideae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 47, 25–70.Google Scholar

Etchevery, A. V., Alemán, M. M. and Fleming, T. F. (2008). Flower morphology, pollination biology and mating system of the complex flower of Vigna Caracalla (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae). Ann. Bot. 102, 305–16.Google Scholar

Evans, R. C., and Dickinson, T. A. (1996). North American black-fruited hawthorns. II. Floral development of 10- and 20- stamen morphotypes in Crateaegus section douglasii (Rosaceae, Maloideae). Am. J. Bot. 83, 961–78.Google Scholar

Evans, R. C., and Dickinson, T. A. (2005). Floral ontogeny and morphology in Gillenia (‘Spiraeoideae’) and subfamily Maloideae C. Weber (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 427–47.Google Scholar

Eyde, R. H. (1977). Reproductive structures and evolution in Ludwigia (Onagraceae). I. androecium, placentation, merism. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 64, 644–55.Google Scholar

Eyde, R. H., and Morgan, J. T. (1973). Floral structure and evolution in Lopezieae (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 60, 771–87.Google Scholar

Faden, R. B. (2000). Floral biology of Commelinaceae. In Monocots, systematics and Evolution, ed. Wilson, K. L. and Morrison, D. A.. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 309–17.Google Scholar

Falcão, M. J. A., Paulino, J. V., Kochanowski, F. J., Figgueiredo, R. C., Basso-Alves, J. P. and Mansano, V. F. (2020). Development of inflorescences and flowers in Fabaceae subfamily Dialioideae: An evolutionary overview and complete ontogenetic series for Apuleia and Martiodendron. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 193, 19–46.Google Scholar

Farrar, J., and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2013). To be or not to be a staminode: The floral development of Sauvagesia (Ochnaceae) reveals different origins of presumed staminodes. In Flowers, morphology, evolutionary diversification and implications for the environment, ed. Berntsen, T. and Alsvik, K.. New York: Nova Science, pp. 89–103.Google Scholar

Fey, B. S., and Endress, P. K. (1983). Development and morphological interpretation of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173, 451–68.Google Scholar

Fiedler, H. (1910). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Nyctaginaceen. Engl. Bot. Jahrb. 44, 572–605.Google Scholar

Flores-Olvera, H., Vrijdaghs, A., Ochoterena, H. and Smets, E. (2011). The need to re-investigate the nature of homoplastic characters: An ontogenetic case study of the ‘bracteoles’ in Atripliceae (Chenopodiaceae). Ann. Bot. 108, 847–65.Google Scholar

Frame, D., and Durou, S. (2001). Morphology and biology of Napolaeona vogellii (Lecythidaceae) flowers in relation to the natural history of insect visitors. Biotropica 33, 458–71.Google Scholar

Franz, E. (1908). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Portulacaceen und Basellaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 42 , Beibl. 97, 1–28.Google Scholar

Freitas, L., Bernardello, G., Galetto, L. and Paoli, A. A. S. (2001). Nectaries and reproductive biology of Croton sarcopetalus (Euphorbiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 267–77.Google Scholar

Friedman, J. (2011). Gone with the wind: Understanding evolutionary transitions between wind and animal pollination in the angiosperms. New Phytol. 191, 911–13.Google Scholar

Friedman, J., and Barrett, S. C. (2008). A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of wind pollination in the Angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 49–58.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H.-C. (1956). Studien über die natürliche Verwandtschaft der Plumbaginales und Centrospermae. Phyton (Austria) 6, 220–63.Google Scholar

Friis, E. M. (1984). Preliminary report of Upper Cretaceous Angiosperm reproductive organs from Sweden and their level of organisation. Ann. Mo Bot. Gard. 71, 403–18.Google Scholar

Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R. and Crane, P. R. (2006). Cretaceous Angiosperm flowers, innovation and evolution in plant reproduction. Paleogeogr. Palaeoclimat. Palaeoecol. 232, 251–93.Google Scholar

Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R. and Crane, P. R. (2016). The emergence of core eudicots: New floral evidence from the earliest late Cretaceous. Proc. Roy. Soc. B283, 20161325.Google Scholar

Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. L., and Schönenberger, J. (2006). Normapolles plants, a prominent component of the Cretaceous Rosid diversification. Plant Syst. Evol. 260, 107–40.Google Scholar

Fu, L., Zen, Q.-W., Liao, J.-P. and Xu, F.-X. (2009). Anatomy and ontogeny of unisexual flowers in dioecious Woonyoungia septentrionalis (Dandy) Law (Magnoliaceae). J. Syst. Evol. 47, 263–72.Google Scholar

Fukuoka, N., Ito, M. and Iwatsuki, K. (1986). Floral anatomy of the mangrove genus Lumnizera (Combretaceae). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 37, 69–81.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, K. B., Cordeiro, I. and Demarco, D. (2018). Structure and development of flowers and inflorescences in Peraceae and the evolution of pseudanthia in Malpighiales. PLOS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203954Google Scholar

Gagliardi, K. B., de Souza, L. A. and Albiero, A. L. M. (2014). Comparative fruit development in some Euphorbiaceae and Phyllanthaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 300, 775–82.Google Scholar

Gallant, J. B., Kemp, J. R. and Lacroix, C. R. (1998). Floral development of dioecious staghorn sumac, Rhus hirta (Anacardiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159, 539–49.Google Scholar

Galle, P. (1977). Untersuchungen zur Blütenentwicklung der Polygonaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 98, 449–89.Google Scholar

Gandhi, K. N., and Dale Thomas, R. (1983). A note on the androecium of the genus Croton and flowers in general of the family Euphorbiaceae. Phytologia 54, 6–8.Google Scholar

Gandolfo, M. A., Nixon, K. C. and Crepet, W. L. (1998). Tylerianthus crossmanensis gen. et sp. nov. (Aff. Hydrageaceae) from the Upper Cretaceous of New Jersey. Am. J. Bot. 85, 376–86.Google Scholar

Gauthier, R., and Arros, J. (1963). L’anatomie de la fleur staminée de l’Hillebrandia sandwicensis Oliver et la vascularisation de l’étamine. Phytomorphology 13, 115–27.Google Scholar

Ge, L.-P., Lu, A.-M. and Gong, C.-R. (2007). Ontogeny of the fertile flower in Platycrater arguta (Hydrangeaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 168, 835–44.Google Scholar

Geitler, L. (1929). Zur Morphologie der Blüten von Polygonum. Österr. Bot. Zeit. 78, 229–41.Google Scholar

Gelius, L. (1967). Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte an Blüten der Saxifragales sensu lato mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Androeceum. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 87, 253–303.Google Scholar

Gemmeke, V. (1982). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Mimosaceen-Blüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103, 185–210.Google Scholar

Gerrath, J. M., Lacroix, C. R. and Posluszny, U. (1990). The developmental morphology of Leea guineensis II. Floral development. Bot. Gaz. 151, 210–20.Google Scholar

Geuten, K., Becker, A., Kaufmann, K., Caris, P., Janssens, S., Viaene, T., Theißen, G. and Smets, E. (2006). Petaloidy and petal identity MADS-box genes in the balsaminoid genera Impatiens and Marcgravia. Plant J. 47, 501–18.Google Scholar

Gilg, E. (1894). Studien über die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Thymelaeales und über die ‘Anatomische Methode’. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 18: 488–574.Google Scholar

Glinos, E., and Cocucci, A. A. (2011). Pollination biology of Canna indica (Cannaceae) with particular reference to the functional morphology of the style. Plant Syst. Evol. 291, 49–58.Google Scholar

Glover, B. J. (2007). Understanding flowers and flowering. An integrated approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glover, B. J., Airoldi, C. A., Brockington, S. F., Fernandez-Mazuecos, M., Martinez-Perez, C., Mellers, G., Moyroud, E. and Taylor, L. (2015). How have advances in comparative floral development influenced our understanding of floral evolution? Int. J. Plant Sci. 176, 307–23.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, A. M. (2016). Floral structure, development of the gynoecium, and embryology in Schinopsis balansae Engler (Anacardiaceae) with particular reference to aporogamy. Int. J. Plant Sci. 177, 326–38.Google Scholar

González, F., and Bello, M. A. (2009). Intraindividual variation variation of flowers of Gunnera (Gunneraceae) and proposed apomorphies for Gunnerales. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 160, 262–83.Google Scholar

González, F., and Rudall, P. (2010). Flower and fruit characters in the early-divergent Lamiid family Metteniusaceae, with particular reference to the evolution of pseudomonomery. Am. J. Bot. 97, 191–206.Google Scholar

González, F., and Stevenson, D. W. (2000a). Perianth development and systematics of Aristolochia. Flora 195, 370–91.Google Scholar

González, F., and Stevenson, D. W. (2000b). Gynostemium development in Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122, 249–91.Google Scholar

Gottschling, M. (2004). Floral ontogeny in Bourreria (Ehretiaceae, Boraginales). Flora 199, 409–23.Google Scholar

Graf, J. (1975). Tafelwerk zur Pflanzensystematik mit euartiger Bildmethode. München: J. F. Lehmanns.Google Scholar

Greenberg, A. K., and Donoghue, M. J. (2011). Molecular systematics and character evolution in Caryophyllaceae. Taxon 60, 1637–52.Google Scholar

Grey-Wilson, C. (1980). Some observations on the floral vascular antomy of Impatiens (Studies in Balsaminaceae VI). Kew Bull. 35, 221–7.Google Scholar

Groeninckx, I., Vrijdaghs, A., Huysmans, S., Smets, E. and Dessein, S. (2007). Floral ontogeny of the Afro-Madagascan genus Mitrasacmopsis with comments on the development of superior ovaries in Rubiaceae. Ann. Bot. 100, 41–9.Google Scholar

Guédès, M. (1979). Morphology of seed-plants. Vaduz, Liechtenstein: J. Cramer.Google Scholar

Guo, X., Thomas, D. C. and Saunders, R. M. K. (2018). Organ homologies and perianth evolution in the Dasymaschalon alliance (Annonaceae): Inner petal loss and its functional consequences. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 174. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00174Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M. H. G. (1995). Petal venation in Asterales and related orders. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 118, 1–18.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M. H. G. (2000). Floral morphology and relationships of Clusia gundlachii with a discussion of floral organ identity and diversity in the genus Clusia. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 43–53.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M. H. G., and Albert, V. A. (1999). Inferior ovaries and Angiosperm diversification. In Molecular systematics and plant evolution, ed. Hollingsworth, P. M., Bateman, R. M. and Gornall, R. J.. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 403–31.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M. H. G., and Bittrich, V. (2002). Evolution of morphological diversity and resin secretion in flowers of Clusia (Clusiaceae), insights from ITS sequence variation. Nord. J. Bot. 22, 183–203.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, M. H. G., Bittrich, V., and Stevens, P. F. (2002). Phylogeny of Clusiaceae based on rbcL sequences. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 1045–54.Google Scholar

Haas, P. (1976). Morphologische, anatomische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Blüten und Früchten hochsukkulenter Mesembryanthemaceen-Gattungen – ein Beitrag zu ihrer Systematik. Diss. Bot. 33, 1–256.Google Scholar

Haber, J. M. (1966). The comparative anatomy and morphology of the flowers and inflorescences of the Proteaceae III. Some African taxa. Phytomorphology 16, 490–527.Google Scholar

Hall, J. C., Sytsma, K. J. and Iltis, H. H. (2002). Phylogeny of Capparaceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1826–42.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. R., and Stevenson, D. W. (2000a). Development of the gametophytes, flower, and floral vasculature in Cochliostema odoratissimum (Commelinaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 134, 131–57.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. R., and Stevenson, D. W. (2000b). Floral organogenesis in some species of Tradescantia and Callisia (Commelinaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, 551–62.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. R., Davis, J. R. and Stevenson, D. W. (2004). Floral organogenesis in Plowmanianthus (Commelinaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 511–19.Google Scholar

Harris, E. M. (1995). Inflorescence and floral ontogeny in Asteraceae, a synthesis of historical and current concepts. Bot. Rev. 61, 94–278.Google Scholar

Harrison, C. J., Möller, M. and Cronk, Q. C. B. (1999). Evolution and development of floral diversity in Streptocarpus and Saintpaulia. Ann. Bot. 84, 49–60.Google Scholar

Haston, E. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2007). Inflorescence and floral development in Streptocarpus and Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae) with particular reference to the impact of bracteole suppression. Plant Syst. Evol. 265, 13–25.Google Scholar

Hayes, V., Schneider, E. L. and Carlquist, S. (2000). Floral development of Nelumbo nucifera Nelumbonaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 (6 Suppl.), S183–S191.Google Scholar

Heinig, K. H. (1951). Studies in the floral morphology of the Thymelaeaceae. Am. J. Bot. 38, 113–32.Google Scholar

Hiepko, P. (1964). Das zentrifugale Androeceum der Paeoniaceae. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 77, 427–35.Google Scholar

Hiepko, P. (1965). Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 84, 359–508.Google Scholar

Hiepko, P. (1966). Zur Morphologie, Anatomie und Funktion des Diskus der Paeoniaceae. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 79, 233–45.Google Scholar

Hileman, L. C., Kramer, E. M. and Baum, D. A. (2003). Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12814–19.Google Scholar

Hilger, H. H. (1984). Wachstum und Ausbildungsformen des Gynoeceums von Rochelia (Boraginaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 146, 123–39.Google Scholar

Hofmann, U. (1973). Centrospermen-Studien 6, Morphologische Untersuchungen zur Umgrenzung und Gliederung der Aizoaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 93, 247–324.Google Scholar

Hofmann, U. (1993). Flower morphology and ontogeny. In Caryophyllales. Evolution and Systematics, ed. Behnke, H.-D. and Mabry, T. J.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 123–66.Google Scholar

Hofmann, U., and Göttmann, J. (1990). Morina L. und Triplostegia Wall. ex DC. im Vergleich mit Valerianaceae und Dipsacaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 111, 499–553.Google Scholar

Horn, J. W. (2007). Dilleniaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. IX, ed. Kubitzki, K.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 132–54.Google Scholar

Howarth, D. G., and Donoghue, M. J. (2005). Duplications in cyc-like genes from Dipsacales correlate with floral form. Int. J. Plant Sci. 166, 357–70.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1989a). Structure of the inflorescence and flower of Petalonix linearis (Loasaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 163, 211–26.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1989b). The structure and potential loasaceous affinities of Schismocarpus. Nord. J. Bot. 9, 217–27.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1990). Androecial development and the problem of monophyly of Loasaceae. Can. J. Bot. 68, 402–19.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1992a). Rosidae and their relationships to other non-magnoliid Dicotyledons, a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Ann. Mo Bot. Gard. 79, 218–48.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1992b). Floral structure of Besseya and Synthyris (Scrophulariaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 153, 217–29.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1995). Patterns of ontogenetic evolution in perianth diversification of Besseya (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82, 655–80.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (1998). Early development of androecia in polystemonous Hydrangeaceae. Am. J. Bot. 85, 1057–67.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (2001). Ontogeny and morphology of the fertile flowers of Hydrangea and allied genera of tribe Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 137, 139–87.Google Scholar

Hufford, L. D. (2003). Homology and developmental transformation, models for the origins of the staminodes of Loasaceae subfamily Loasoideae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.), S409–S439.Google Scholar

Ickert-Bond, S. M., Gerrath, J. and Wen, J. (2014). Gynoecial structure of Vitales and implications for the evolution of placentation in the Rosids. Int. J. Plant Sci. 175, 998–1032.Google Scholar

Igersheim, A., Buzgo, M. and Endress, P. K. (2008). Gynoecium diversity and systematics in basal monocots. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 1–65.Google Scholar

Igersheim, A., Puff, C., Leins, P. and Erbar, C. (1994). Gynoecial development of Gaertnera Lam. and of presumably allied taxa of the Psychotrieae (Rubiaceae), secondarily ‘superior’ vs. inferior ovaries. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 116, 401–14.Google Scholar

Ihlenfeldt, H. D. (1960). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche, morphologische und systematische Untersuchungen an Mesembryanthemen. Feddes Repert. 63, 1–104.Google Scholar

Innes, R. L., Remphrey, W. R. and Lenz, L. M. (1989). An analysis of the development of single and double flowers in Potentilla fruticosa. Can. J. Bot. 67, 1071–9.Google Scholar

Irish, V. F. (2009). Evolution of petal identity. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2517–27.Google Scholar

Ito, M. (1986a). Studies in the floral morphology and anatomy of Nymphaeales III. Floral anatomy of Brasenia schreberi Gmel. and Cabomba caroliniana A. Gray. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 99, 169–84.Google Scholar

Ito, M. (1986b). Studies in the floral morphology and antomy of Nymphaeales IV. Floral anatomy of Nelumbo nucifera. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 37, 82–96.Google Scholar

Iwamoto, A., Ichigooka, S., Cao, L. and Ronse De Craene, L.P. (2020). Floral development reveals the existence of a fifth staminode on the labellum of basal Globbeae. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 133. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00133Google Scholar

Iwamoto, A., Izumidate, R. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2015). Floral anatomy and vegetative development in Ceratophyllum demersum (Ceratophyllaceae): Morphological picture of an ‘unsolved plant’. Am. J. Bot. 102, 1578–89.Google Scholar

Iwamoto, A., Nakamura, A., Kurihara, S., Otani, A. and Ronse De Craene, L. P. (2018). Floral development of petaloid Alismatales as an insight into the origin of the trimerous Bauplan in monocot flowers. J. Plant Res. 131, 395–407.Google Scholar

Iwamoto, A., Shimizu, A. and Ohba, H. (2003). Floral development and phyllotactic variation in Ceratophyllum demersum (Ceratophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90, 1124–30.Google Scholar

Jabour, F., Damerval, C. and Nadot, S. (2008). Evolutionary trends in the flowers of Asteridae, is polyandry an alternative to zygomorphy? Ann. Bot. 102, 153–65.Google Scholar

Jabour, F., Ronse De Craene, L. P., Nadot, S. and Damerval, C. (2009). Establishment of zygomorphy on an ontogenic spiral and evolution of perianth in the tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae). Ann. Bot. 104, 809–22.Google Scholar

Jäger-Zürn, I. (1966). Infloreszenz- und blütenmorphologische, sowie embryologische Untersuchungen an Myrothamnus Welw. Beitr. Biol Pflanz. 42, 241–71.Google Scholar

Janka, H., Von Balthazar, M., Alverson, W. S., Baum, D. A., Semir, J. and Bayer, C. (2008). Structure, development and evolution of the androecium in Adansonieae (core Bombacoideae, Malvaceae s.l.). Plant Syst. Evol. 275, 69–91.Google Scholar

Jansen, R. K., Cai, Z., Raubeson, L. A., Daniell, H., dePamphilis, C. W., Leebens-Mack, J., Müller, K. Guisinger-Bellian, M. Haberle, R. C., Hansen, A. K., Chumley, T. W., Lee, S.-B., Peery, R., McNeal, J. R., Kuehl, J. V. and Boore, J. L. (2007). Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19369–74.Google Scholar

Janssens, S. B., Smets, E. F. and Vrijdaghs, A. (2012). Floral development of Hydrocera and Impatiens reveals evolutionary trends in the most early diverged lineages of the Balsaminaceae. Ann. Bot. 109, 1285–96.Google Scholar

Jaramillo, M. A., and Kramer, E. M. (2004). APETALA3 and PISTILLATA homologs exhibit novel expression patterns in the unique perianth of Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae). Evolution and Development 6, 449–58.Google Scholar

Jaramillo, M. A., and Manos, P. S. (2001). Phylogeny and patterns of floral diversity in the genus Piper (Piperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88, 706–16.Google Scholar

Jaramillo, M. A., Manos, P. and Zimmer, E. A. (2004). Phylogenetic relationships of the perianthless Piperales, reconstructing the evolution of floral development. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165, 403–16.Google Scholar

Jeiter, J., Danisch, F. and Hilger, H. H. (2016). Polymery and nectary chambers in Codon (Codonaceae): Flower and fruit development in a small, capsule-bearing family of Boraginales. Flora 220, 94–102.Google Scholar

Jeiter, J., Langecker, S. and Weigend, M. (2020). Towards an integrative understanding of stamen-corolla tube modifications and floral architecture in Boraginaceae s.s. (Boraginales). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 193, 100–24.Google Scholar

Jeiter, J., Staedler, Y. M., Schönenberger, J., Weigend, M. and Luebert, F. (2018). Gynoecium and fruit development in Heliotropium sect. Heliothamnus (Heliotropiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 179, 275–86.Google Scholar

Jeiter, J., Weigend, M. and Hilger, H. H. (2017). Geraniales flowers revisited: Evolutionary trends in floral nectaries. Ann. Bot. 119, 395–408.Google Scholar

Jenny, M. (1988). Different gynoecium types in Sterculiaceae, ontogeny and functional aspects. In Aspects of floral development, ed. Leins, P., Tucker, S. C. and Endress, P. K.. Berlin: J. Cramer, pp. 225–36.Google Scholar

Judd, W. S., Campbell, C. S., Kellogg, E. A., Stevens, P. F. and Donoghue, M. J. (2002). Plant systematics, a phylogenetic approach. 2nd ed. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Judd, W. S., and Olmstead, R. G. (2004). A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. Am. J. Bot. 91, 1627–44.Google Scholar

Judd, W. S., Sanders, R. W. and Donoghue, M. J. (1994). Angiosperm family pairs, preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Pap. Bot. 5, 1–51.Google Scholar

Juncosa, A. M. (1988). Floral development and character evolution in Rhizophoraceae. In Aspects of floral development, ed. Leins, P., Tucker, S. C. and Endress, P. K.. Vaduz (Liechtenstein): Cramer, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar

Juncosa, A. M., and Tomlinson, P. B. (1987). Floral development in mangrove Rhizophoraceae. Amer. J. Bot. 74, 1263–79.Google Scholar

Källersjö, M., Bergqvist, G. and Anderberg, A. A. (2000). Generic realignment in primuloid families of the Ericales s.l., a phylogenetic analysis based on DNA sequences from three chloroplast genes and morphology. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1325–41.Google Scholar

Kania, W. (1973). Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Rosaceenblüten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 93, 175–246.Google Scholar

Kanno, A., Nakada, M., Akita, Y. and Hirae, M. (2007). Class B gene expression and the modified ABC model in nongrass monocots. The Scientific World Journal 7, 268–79.Google Scholar

Karpunina, P. V., Oskolski, A. A., Nuraliev, M. S., Lowry II, P. P., Degtjavera, G. V., Samigullin, T. H., Valiejo-Roman, C. M. and Sokoloff, D. D. (2016). Gradual vs abrupt reduction of carpels in syncarpous gynoecia: A case study from Polyscias subg. Arthrophyllum (Araliaceae: Apiales). Am. J. Bot. 103, 2028–57.Google Scholar

Karrer, A. B. (1991). Blütenentwicklung und systematische Stellung der Papaveraceae und Capparaceae. University of Zürich (Switzerland): Unpublished thesis.Google Scholar

Kaul, R. B. (1968). Floral morphology and phylogeny in the Hydrocharitaceae. Phytomorphology 18, 13–35.Google Scholar

Keller, J. A., Herendeen, P. S. and Crane, P. R. (1996). Fossil flowers and fruits of the Actinidiaceae from the Campanian (late Cretaceous) of Georgia. Am. J. Bot. 83, 528–41.Google Scholar

Kelly, L. M. (2001). Taxonomy of Asarum section Asarum (Aristolochiaceae). Syst. Bot. 26, 17–53.Google Scholar

Kelly, L. M., and González, F. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships in Aristolochiaceae. Syst. Bot. 28, 236–49.Google Scholar

Kessler, P. J. A. (1993). Menispermaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants vol. II, ed. Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G. and Bittrich, V.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 402–18.Google Scholar

Kim, S., Yoo, M.-J., Kong, H., Hu, Y., Ma, H., Soltis, P. S., and Soltis, D. E. (2005). Expression of floral MADS-box genes in basal Angiosperms, implications for the evolution of floral regulators. Plant J. 43, 724–44.Google Scholar

Kirchoff, B. K. (1983). Floral organogenesis in five genera of the Marataceae and in Canna (Cannaceae). Am. J. Bot. 70, 508–23.Google Scholar

Kirchoff, B. K. (1988). Inflorescence and flower development in Costus scaber (Costaceae). Can. J. Bot. 62, 339–45.Google Scholar

Kirchoff, B. K. (1992). Ovary structure and anatomy in the Heliconiaceae and Musaceae (Zingiberales). Can. J. Bot. 70, 2490–2508.Google Scholar

Kirchoff, B. K. (1997). Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae), Hedychium. Can. J. Bot. 75, 581–94.Google Scholar

Kirchoff, B. K. (2000). Hofmeister’s rule and primordium shape, influences on organ position in Hedychium coronarium (Zingiberaceae). In Monocots, systematics and evolution, ed. Wilson, K. L. and Morrison, D. A.. Melbourne: CSIRO, pp. 75–83.Google Scholar

Kirchoff, B. K., Liu, H. and Liao, J.-P. (2020). Inflorescence and flower development in Orchidantha chinensis T. L. Wu (Lowiaceae; Zingiberales): Similarities to inflorescence structure in the Strelitziaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 181, 716–31.Google Scholar

Klopfer, K. (1973). Florale Morphogenese und Taxonomie der Saxifragaceae sensu lato. Feddes Repert. 84, 475–516.Google Scholar

Knapp, S. (2002). Floral diversity and evolution in the Solanaceae. In Developmental genetics and plant evolution, ed. Cronk, Q. C. B., Bateman, R. M. and Hawkins, J. A.. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 267–97.Google Scholar

Kocyan, A., and Endress, P. K. (2001a). Floral structure and development and systematic aspects of some ‘lower’ Asparagales. Plant Syst. Evol. 229, 187–216.Google Scholar

Kocyan, A., and Endress, P. K. (2001b). Floral structure and development of Apostasia and Neuwiedia (Apostasioideae) and their relationships to other Orchidaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162, 847–67.Google Scholar

Koethe, S., Bloemer, J. and Lunau, K. (2017). Testing the influence of gravity on flower symmetry in five Saxifraga species. Sci. Nat. 104, 37. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017–1458–4Google Scholar

Köhler, E. (2003). Simmondsiaceae. In The families and genera of vascular plants vol. II, ed. Kubitzki, K. and Bayer, C.. Berlin: Springer, pp. 355–8.Google Scholar

Kong, D.-R., Schori, M., Li, L. and Peng, H. (2018). Floral development of Gonocaryum with emphasis on the gynoecium. Plant Syst. Evol. 304, 327–41.Google Scholar

Kosuge, K. (1994). Petal evolution in Ranunculaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 8, 185–91.Google Scholar

Kramer, E. M, Di Stilio, V. S. and Schlüter, P. M. (2003). Complex patterns of gene duplication in the apetala3 and pistillata lineages of the Ranunculaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, 1–11.Google Scholar

Kramer, E. M., Su, H.-J. Wu, C.-C., Hu, J.-M. (2006). A simplified explanation for the frameshift mutation that created a novel C-terminal motif in the APETALA3 gene lineage. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6, 30.Google Scholar