Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T14:21:56.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

BY ANALYSING FDI IN A macroeconomic framework, this study throws new light on various channels through which FDI can influence saving, investment, growth, and the balance of payments on current account. The first finding is that in a sample of sixteen developing countries, FDI does not provide additional balance-of payments financing for a pre-existing current account deficit. In the eleven developing countries constituting a control group, FDI is associated with reduced domestic investment, so implying that FDI to these countries is simply a close substitute for other capital inflows. For five Southeast Asian developing market economies, however, FDI raises domestic investment by the full extent of the FDI inflow. In these countries, therefore, FDI has not been used as a substitute for other types of capital inflows but has increased capital formation and so worsened the current account.

In examining some secondary effects, I find that FDI has a significantly negative impact on national saving in this sample of developing countries. For the control group, this negative effect is of similar magnitude to the negative effect of FDI on domestic investment, implying a zero effect on the current account. However, the negative effect of FDI on national saving in the five Southeast Asian developing market economies indicates that FDI could have a negative effect on the current account in excess of its negative effect through increased domestic investment.

I also find distinctive differences in the effects of FDI on economic growth in the control group and the Southeast Asian developing market economies. While FDI has a negative effect on growth in the first country group, it has the same positive effect on growth as domestically financed investment in the latter country group.

Finally, for the complete sample of sixteen developing countries, I show that FDI raises the rate of economic growth in the absence of financial repression and trade distortions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia
Differential Impacts
, pp. 56 - 62
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×