Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:06:50.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Re-enforcing Enforcement in a Specialized Convention on Crimes Against Humanity

Inter-State Cooperation, Mutual Legal Assistance, and the Aut Dedere Aut Judicare Obligation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Laura M. Olson
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
Leila Nadya Sadat
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

The fight against impunity for serious crimes under international law, such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, continues. A new effort in this fight focusing on crimes against humanity is the Crimes Against Humanity Initiative launched by Washington University Law's Whitney R. Harris World Law Institute to study the international law regarding crimes against humanity and to draft a multilateral treaty condemning and prohibiting such crimes. The Crimes Against Humanity Initiative identified a need for a specialized convention on crimes against humanity, because “most crimes against humanity remain outside the ambit of a universal treaty, unless they involve a situation within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Even in that case, no provision for State Responsibility exists, and no mechanisms for interstate enforcement are provided for.”

The key to effectively fighting impunity is robust enforcement mechanisms. Thus, a new specialized convention on crimes against humanity should aim to bridge gaps in enforcement by providing “much-needed provisions on interstate cooperation in investigation and punishment of perpetrators of crimes against humanity, filling both a normative gap, and providing critically important enforcement mechanisms.” This should include “fostering the notion that states have an obligation to prosecute. Such an obligation, however, must be coupled with providing the realistic capacity to prosecute which, for many states, will necessarily involve prosecutions requiring interstate cooperation in the form of mutual legal assistance.”

This chapter addresses enforcement measures with regard to crimes against humanity, focusing on forms of inter-State cooperation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassiouini, M. Cherif, Legal Control of International Terrorism: A Policy-Oriented Assessment, 43 Harv. Int'l L.J. 83 (2002)Google Scholar
Kelly, Michael J., Cheating Justice by Cheating Death: The Doctrinal Collision for Prosecuting Foreign Terrorists – Passage of Aut Dedere Aut Judicare into Customary Law and Refusal to Extradite Based on the Death Penalty, 20 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 491, 497 (2003)Google Scholar
Plachta, Michael, (Non-)Extradition of Nationals: A Neverending Story?, 13 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 77, 125–26 (1999)Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law, 78 Calif. L. Rev. 449, 489–92 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugard, John, Is the Truth and Reconciliation Process Compatible with International Law? An Unanswered Question, 13 S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 258, 267 (1997)Google Scholar
Dugard, John, Dealing with Crimes of the Past: Is Amnesty Still an Option?, 12 Leiden J. Int'l L. 1001 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagaris, Bruce, Developments in International Judicial Assistance and Related Matters, 18 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 339 (1990)Google Scholar
Hannay, William M., The Legislative Approach to the Political Offense Exception, inLegal Responses to International Terrorism 115 (M. Cherif Bassiouni ed., 1988)Google Scholar
Guymon, CarrieLyn Donigan, International Legal Mechanisms for Combating Transnational Organized Crime: The Need for a Multilateral Convention, 18 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 53, 81–85 (2000)Google Scholar
Gully-Hart, Paul, Loss of Time Through Formal and Procedural Requirements in International Co-operation, inPrinciples and Procedures for a New Transnational Criminal Law: Documentation of an International Workshop, Freiburg, May 1991Google Scholar
Gurulé, Jimmy, The 1988 U.N. Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances – A Ten Year Perspective: Is International Cooperation Merely Illusory?, 22 Fordham Int'l L.J. 74 (1998)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×