6 - The Moral Agent
Summary
Nobody professes to doubt that, so far as we possess a power of bettering things, it is our paramount duty to use it and to train all our intellect and energy to this supreme service of our kind. Hence the pressing interest of the question, to what extent modern progress in natural knowledge, and, more especially, the general outcome of that progress in the doctrine of evolution, is competent to help us in the great work of helping one another?
(T. H. Huxley)T.H. Huxley, though he spoke as a man of science, gave a priestly cadence to his concluding words on ‘Evolution and Ethics’ in 1893: ‘We are grown men, and must play the man “strong in will/ To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield,” cherishing the good that falls in our way, and bearing the evil, in and around us, with stout hearts set on diminishing it.’ The moral sensibility and the language, quoting the late poet laureate, Tennyson, and alluding self-appreciatively to the ‘stout-hearted’ Englishman, belonged to a shared way of life and not especially to the occupation of science. His lecture was much discussed. What, then, of the relation between science and such injunctions to the will?
In this chapter, I address this question, and I do so by examining closely a key text and the controversy which it aroused.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Free Will and the Human Sciences in Britain, 1870–1910 , pp. 103 - 132Publisher: Pickering & ChattoFirst published in: 2014