Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the Enlightenment Religion, Philosophy, and Reason at the Crux of Modernity
Book contents
- Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the Enlightenment
- Reviews
- Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the Enlightenment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Critique of Reason: Debates on Rationalism, Empiricism, and Skepticism
- Part II Faith and Revelation: Debates on Theism, Atheism, and Nihilism
- Part III Jacobi and the Revival of Socraticism: The Muenster Circle and Existentialism
- Part IV Jacobi’s Impact on Idealism and Romanticism
- Jacobi Sources
- Index
- References
Part IV - Jacobi’s Impact on Idealism and Romanticism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2023
Edited by
Book contents
- Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the Enlightenment
- Reviews
- Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the Enlightenment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I The Critique of Reason: Debates on Rationalism, Empiricism, and Skepticism
- Part II Faith and Revelation: Debates on Theism, Atheism, and Nihilism
- Part III Jacobi and the Revival of Socraticism: The Muenster Circle and Existentialism
- Part IV Jacobi’s Impact on Idealism and Romanticism
- Jacobi Sources
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi and the Ends of the EnlightenmentReligion, Philosophy, and Reason at the Crux of Modernity, pp. 225 - 301Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Beiser, Frederick C. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Brecht, Martin. “Die Anfänge der idealistischen Philosophie und die Rezeption Kants in Tübingen (1785–1795).” In 500 Jahre Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen: Beiträge zur Geschichte der Universität Tübingen, 1477–1977. Edited by Decker-Hauff, Hansmartin, 381–428. Tubingen: Attempo, 1977.Google Scholar
Onnasch, Ernst-Otto. “Kant als Anfang der Klassischen Deutschen Philosophie?” In Die Klassische Deutsche Philosophie und ihre Folgen. Edited by Hackl, Michael and Danz, Christian, 15–42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Flatt, Johann Friedrich. Briefe über den moralischen Erkenntnisgrund der Religion überhaupt, und besonders in Beziehung auf die Kantische Philosophie. Tübingen: Cotta, 1789.Google Scholar
Philosophische Vorlesungen 1790: Nachschriften von August Friedrich Klüpfel. Edited by Franz, Michael and Onnasch, Ernst-Otto. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 2018.Google Scholar
Fragmentarische Beyträge zur Bestimmung und Deduktion des Begriffs und Grundsatzes der Caussalität und zur Grundlegung der natürlichen Theologie, in Beziehung auf die Kantische Philosophie. Leipzig: Siegfried Lebrecht Crusius, 1788.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Briefe von und an Hegel. Edited by Hoffmeister, Johannes. 3 vols. Hamburg: Meiner, 1961.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. Der Grund im Bewußtsein: Untersuchungen zu Hölderlins Denken (1794–1795). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1992.Google Scholar
Grundlegung aus dem Ich: Untersuchungen zur Vorgeschichte des Idealismus, Tübingen/Jena 1790–1794. 2 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2004.Google Scholar
Immanuel Carl Diez, Briefwechsel und Kantische Schriften: Wissensbegründung in der Glaubenskrise Tübingen-Jena (1790–1792). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1997.Google Scholar
Hölderlin, Friedrich. Sämtliche Werke und Briefe. Edited by Knaupp, Michael. Munich: Carl Hanser, 1992.Google Scholar
Onnasch, Ernst-Otto. “Die Rezeption Reinholds im Tübinger Stift zwischen 1790 und 1792.” In Will, Willkür, Freedom: Reinhold’s Concept of Freedom in the Context of 18th Century Philosophy. Edited by Stolz, Violetta, Heinz, Marion, and Bondeli, Martin, 301–25. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.Google Scholar
“Fichte im Tübinger Stift: Johann Friedrich Flatts Einfluss auf Fichtes philosophische Entwicklung.” In Fichte und seine Zeit: Kontext, Konfrontationen, Rezeptionen. Edited by d’Alfonso, Matteo Vincenzo, De Pascale, Carla, Fuchs, Erich, and Ivaldo, Marco, 19–38. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
References
Breazeale, Daniel. Thinking Through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte’s Early Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cahen-Maurel, Laure. “‘(Toi.) (A la place du Non-Moi – Toi)’: Jacobi, Fichte, Novalis.” In L’homme et la nature: Politique, critique et esthétique dans le romantisme allemand, edited by Valpione, Giulia and François, Arnaud. Berlin: LIT, 2020, 75–92.Google Scholar
“Novalis’s Magical Idealism: A Threefold Philosophy of the Imagination, Love and Medicine.” Symphilosophie: International Journal of Philosophical Romanticism 1 (2019): 129–65.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George. “Fichte’s Rhetoric of Deception: Reflections on the Early Fichte in the Spirit of Jacobi.” Revue internationale de philosophie 49, no. 191 (1995): 59–78.Google Scholar
“From Jacobi’s Philosophical Novel to Fichte’s Idealism: Some Comments on the 1798–99 ‘Atheism Dispute’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989): 75–100.Google Scholar
Freedom and Religion in Kant and his Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, and Schelling, F. W. J.. The Philosophical Rupture between Fichte and Schelling: Selected Texts and Correspondence (1800–1802). Edited and translated by Michael G. Vater and David W. Wood. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Edited by Lauth, Reinhard, Gliwitzky, Hans, Fuchs, Erich, and Schneider, Peter. 42 vols. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1962–2012.Google Scholar
Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings. Edited and translated by Breazeale, Daniel. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Garcia, Luis Fellipe. La philosophie comme Wissenschaftslehre. Le projet fichtéen d’une nouvelle pratique du savoir. Hildesheim: Olms, 2018.Google Scholar
Hammacher, Klaus. “Fichte, Maimon und Jacobi.” In Transzendentalphilosophie als System: Die Auseinandersetzung zwischen 1794 und 1806, edited by Mues, Albert, 243–63. Hamburg: Meiner, 1989.Google Scholar
Hampton, Alexander J. B. Romanticism and the Re-Invention of Modern Religion: The Reconciliation of German Idealism and Platonic Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivaldo, Marco. “Die Anweisung zum seeligen Leben als Antwort auf Jacobis Nihilismus-Vorwurf.” Fichte-Studien 43 (2016): 172–85.Google Scholar
Radrizzani, Ives. “Die Bestimmung des Menschen: Fichtes Antwort auf Jacobis Brief an ihn.” Fichte-Studien 45 (2018): 154–80.Google Scholar
“Le nihilisme comme destin de la philosophie moderne: Le diagnostic de Jacobi et de Fichte.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 106 (2020): 231–46.Google Scholar
“Die Krise der Aufklärung und der Nihilismusvorwurf: Jacobi gegen oder mit Fichte?” In Das Transzendentale und die praktische Philosophie, edited by Cogliandro, Giovanni, De Pascale, Carla, and Radrizzani, Ives, 119–34. Hildesheim: Olms, 2020.Google Scholar
Rosales, Jacinto Rivera de. “Jacobi contra Fichte: La primera acusación de nihilismo.” Teoria: Rivista di Filosofia 40, no. 1 (2020): 77–90.Google Scholar
Sandkaulen, Birgit, and Jaeschke, Walter (eds.). Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi. Ein Wendepunkt der geistigen Bildung der Zeit. Hamburg: Meiner, 2004.Google Scholar
Jacobis Philosophie: Über den Widerspruch zwischen System und Freiheit. Hamburg: Meiner, 2019.Google Scholar
Schick, Stefan. Vermittelte Unmittelbarkeit: Jacobis ‘Salto mortale’ als Konzept zur Aufhebung des Gegensatzes von Glauben und Spekulation in der intellektuellen Anschauung der Vernunft. Wurzburg: Königshausen and Neumann, 2006.Google Scholar
Verweyen, Hansjürgen. “Fichte’s Philosophy of Religion.” In Cambridge Companion to Fichte, edited by James, David and Zöller, Günter, 273–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter. “‘Das Element aller Gewissheit’: Jacobi, Kant und Fichte über den Glauben.” Fichte Studien 14 (1998): 21–41.Google Scholar
References
Aertsen, Jan. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought. Leiden: Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. Le désenchantement du monde: une histoire politique de la religion. Paris: Gallimard, 1985.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael Allen. The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Alexander J. B. “Romantic Religion: Dissolution and Transcendence in the Poetics of Hölderlin.” Symphilosophie 1 (2019): 61–74.Google Scholar
Romanticism and the Re-Invention of Modern Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hardenberg, Friedrich von (Novalis). Schriften: Die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs (Historische-kritische Ausgabe). Edited by Kluckhohn, Paul, Samuel, Richard, Schulz, Gerhard and Mähl, Hans-Joachim. 6 vols. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960–2006.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Viladesau, Richard. “Art and Meaning.” In Christian Platonism: A History, edited by Hampton, Alexander J. B. and Kenney, John, 408–431. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “Immanence and Transcendence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nineteenth-Century Christian Thought, edited by Rasmussen, Joel D. S., Wolfe, Judith, and Zachhuber, Johannes, 111–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
References
Altmann, Alexander. Moses Mendelssohn: A Biographical Study. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1973.Google Scholar
di Giovanni, George. Hegel and the Challenge of Spinoza: A Study in German Idealism, 1801–1831. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
The Unfinished Philosophy of Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, in Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi: The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel “Allwill”.Edited and translated by George di Giovanni, 1–167. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press, [1994] 2009.Google Scholar
“Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi”, section 3: “Literary Works.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Archived Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta; https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/friedrich-jacobi/.Google Scholar
Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774–1800. Cambridge: University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Either/Or: Part I and Part II. Edited and translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Roth, Friedrich von, ed. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi’s Auserlesener Briefwechsel. Leipzig: Fleischer, 1825–7.Google Scholar