Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T23:33:25.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women at the crossroads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

Philip Alston
Affiliation:
New York University
James Crawford
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Among the treaty bodies set up to monitor the implementation of the key international human rights instruments, the Committee of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has long been the least visible one for the international human rights community. Having started its work in 1982, it is only since the mid-1990s that a number of developments have provided greater opportunities for the Committee to increase its impact and visibility both within and outside the United Nations human rights treaty system.

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) was adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 18 December 1979, and entered into force on 3 September 1981. As of 9 December 1999, there were 165 states parties to the Convention, making it the second most widely accepted international human rights treaty after the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), whose own success could be seen as helping to set the scene for increased attention to less traditional areas of human rights concern.

The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women was established by the provisions of article 17 of the Convention. The Committee has twenty-three members, experts who serve in their personal capacity, although they are nominated and elected by states parties with due regard to equitable geographical distribution. A principle meant to guarantee the representation of different forms of civilisation and the principal legal systems, the political imperatives of elections based on such mechanisms have not spared the CEDAW Committee any more than any other UN expert body.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×