References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gender and Technology at WorkFrom Workplace Studies to Social Justice in Design, pp. 339 - 384Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Abagi, Okwach, Sifuna, Olive, and Omamo, Salome Awuor (2009) Professional women empowered to succeed in Kenya’s ICT sector. In Buskens, I. and Webb, A. (eds.), African women & ICTs: Investigating technology, gender and empowerment. London: Zed Books, 169–182.Google Scholar
Abbate, Janet (2012) Recoding gender: Women’s changing participation in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, Lena (2014) Gender and the modern organization, ten years after. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 4(4), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, Lena and Johansson, Jan (2020) Can new technology challenge macho-masculinities? The case of the mining industry. Mineral Economics 34, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abtan, Freida (2016) Where is she? Finding the women in electronic music culture. Contemporary Music Review 35(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acero, Liliana (1995) Conflicting demands of new technology and household work: Women’s work in Brazilian and Argentinian textiles. In Mitter, S. and Rowbotham, S. (eds.), Women encounter technology: Changing patterns of employment in the third world. London: Routledge, 70–92.Google Scholar
Acker, Françoise (1995) Informatisation des unités de soins et travail de formalisation de l’activité infirmière. Sciences Sociales et Santé 13(3), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, Françoise (1997) Sortir de l’invisibilité: Le cas du travail infirmier. Raisons pratiques 8, 65–94.Google Scholar
Acker, Joan (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4(2), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, Joan (1992) Gendering organizational analysis. In Mills, A.J. and Tancred, P. (eds.), Classics of organizational theory. Newbury Park, London, Delhi: Sage, 248–290.Google Scholar
Acker, Joan (1996) Review: Pleasure, power, & technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace (Sally Hacker). Contemporary Sociology 25(4), 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acker, Joan (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20(4), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adair, John G., Puhan, Biranci N., and Vohra, Neharika (1993) Indigenisation of psychology: Empirical assessment of progress in Indian research. International Journal of Psychology 28(2), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, Alison (1998) Artificial knowing: Gender and the thinking machine. London, New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Adam, Alison (2001) Computer ethics in a different voice. Information and Organization 11(4), 235–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addelson, Kathryn Pyne (1983) The man of professional wisdom. In Harding, S. and Hintikka, M.B. (eds.), Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 165–186.Google Scholar
Agnew, John (2001) The new global economy: Time-space compression, geopolitics, and global uneven development. Journal of World-Systems Research 7(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadi, Michael, Eilert, Rebecca, Weibert, Anne, Wulf, Volker, and Marsden, Nicola (2019) Hacking masculine cultures: Career ambitions of female young professionals in a video game company. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play CHI PLAY’19, October 22–25, 2019, Barcelona, Spain. New York: ACM Press, 413–426.Google Scholar
Ahmadi, Michael, Eilert, Rebecca, Weibert, Anne, Wulf, Volker, and Marsden, Nicola (2020a) Feminist living labs as research infrastructures for HCI: The case of a video game company. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2020, April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. New York: ACM Press, 1–15.Google Scholar
Ahmadi, Michael, Eilert, Rebecca, Weibert, Anne, Wulf, Volker and Marsden, Nicola (2020b) ‘We want to push the industry via communication’: Designing communication measures to foster gender diversity in a video game company. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 4 (GROUP), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, Susan, Batty, Alex, and Burchielli, Rosaria (2013) Women constructing masculinity in voluntary firefighting. Gender, Work & Organization 21(1), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akrich, Madeleine (1992) The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 205–224.Google Scholar
Alegria, Sharla N. (2020) What do we mean by broadening participation? Race, inequality, and diversity in tech work. Sociology Compass 14(6), e12793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemann, Anette von, Gruhlich, Julia, Horwath, Ilona, and Weber, Lena (2004) A plea to reflect on the entanglements of gendered work patterns and digital technologies. Gender and Research 21(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
Alfrey, Lauren and Twine, France Winddance (2017) Gender-fluid geek girls: Negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gender & Society 31(1), 28–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, Mustafa (2014) Towards a decolonial computing. In Buchanan, E., de Laat, P., Tavani, H., and Klucarich, J. (eds.), Ambiguous technologies: Philosophical issues, practical solutions. Maidenhead: International Society of Ethics and Information Technology, The Open University, 28–35.Google Scholar
Almeida, Teresa, Balaam, Madeline, and Comber, Rob (2020) Woman-centered design through humanity, activism, and inclusion. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27(4), 1–30.Google Scholar
Alper, Meryl (2017) Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrute, Sareeta and Murillo, Luis Felipe R. (2020) Introduction: Computing in/from the South. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6(2), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andorno, Roberto (2014) Handbook of global bioethics. In Ten Have, H. and Gordijn, B. (eds.), Human dignity and human rights. Dordrecht: Springer, 45–57.Google Scholar
Andrew, Alison (2009) Challenging boundaries to ‘employability’: Women apprentices in a non-traditional occupation. Social Policy and Society 8(3), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnstein, Sherry R. and Christakis, Alexander N. (1975) Perspectives on technology assessment. Jerusalem: Science and Technology Publishers.Google Scholar
Arora, Payal, Raman, Usha, and König, René (eds.) (2023) Feminist futures of work: Reimagining labour in the digital economy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Arun, Shoba and Arun, Thankom (2002) ICTs, gender and development: Women in software production in Kerala. Journal of International Development: The Journal of the Development Studies Association 14(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Mariam (2019) Prefigurative design as a method for research justice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 3, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, Karen Lee (2022) Wronged and dangerous: Viral masculinity and the populist pandemic. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Athreya, Bama (2021) Bias in, bias out: Gender and work in the platform economy. Ottawa: IDRC International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Baethge, Martin and Oberbeck, Herbert (1986) Zukunft der Angestellten: neue Technologien und berufliche Perspektiven in Büro und Verwaltung. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Bagilhole, Barbara M., Dainty, Andrew R.J., and Neale, Richard H. (2002) A woman engineer’s experiences of working on British construction sites. International Journal of Engineering Education 18(4), 422–429.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen (1987) Women and workplace technology: Educational strategies for change. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen (1995) Technology as a factor in women’s occupational stress: The case of telephone operators. In Messing, K., Dumais, L., and Neis, B. (eds.), Invisible. La santé des travailleuses. Charlottetown, PE: Gynergy, 75–103.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen (1997) Sometimes texts speak louder than users: Locating invisible work through textual analysis. In Grundy, A.F., Kohler, D., Oechtering, V., and Petersen, U. (eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.1: Conference on Women, Work and Computerization: Spinning a Web from Past to Future. New York: Springer, 163–176.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen (2002) The invisibility of the everyday: New technology and women’s work in telecommunications in Atlantic Canada. In Meehan, E. and Riordan, E. (eds.), Sex and money: Feminism and political economy in the media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 60–74.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen (2006) Inside the belly of the beast: The challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design PDC 2006, Aug 1–5, 2006, Trento, Italy, 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balka, Ellen (2009) Gender, information technology and making health work: Unpacking complex relations at work. In Balka, E., Green, E., and Henwood, F. (eds.), Gender, health and information in context. Houndsmill and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 104–121.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen (2010) From categorization to public policy: The multiple roles of electronic triage. In Rudinow Sætnan, A., Lomell, H.M., and Hammer, S. (eds.), By the very act of counting: The co-construction of statistics and society. New York: Routledge, 172–190.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen, Bøjrn, Pernille, and Wagner, Ina (2008) Steps toward a typology for health informatics. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW 2008, Nov 8–12, 2008, San Diego, 515–524.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen and Butt, Arsalan (2008) Invisible logic: The role of software as an information intermediary in healthcare. In Wathen, N., Wyatt, S., and Harris, R. (eds.), Mediating health information: The go-betweens in a changing socio-technical landscape. Hampshire: Palgrave Press, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balka, Ellen, Doyle-Waters, Madeleine, Lecznarowicz, Dorota, and FitzGerald, J. Mark (2007) Technology, governance and patient safety: Systems issues in technology and patient safety. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, S48–S57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balka, Ellen and Kahnamoui, Nickki (2004) Technology trouble? Talk to us! Findings from an ethnographic field study. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices PDC’04, July 27–31, 2004, Toronto, ON, Canada. New York: ACM Press, 224–234.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen, Reidl, Christine, and Wagner, Ina (2007) Using fieldwork in analyzing ethical issues related to IT in health care. In Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics MedInfo 2007 Brisbane. AUS: IOS Press, 237–241.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen and Star, Susan Leigh (2016) Mapping the body across diverse information systems: Shadow bodies and how they make us human. In Bowker, G.C., Timmermans, S., Clarke, A.E., and Balka, E. (eds.), Boundary objects and beyond: Working with Leigh Star. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balka, Ellen and Wagner, Ina (2006) Making things work: Dimensions of configurability as appropriation work. In Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 4–8, 2006, Banff, Alberta, Canada. New York: ACM Press, 229–238.Google Scholar
Balka, Ellen and Wagner, Ina (2021) A historical view of studies of women’s work. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 251–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannon, Liam, Schmidt, Kjeld, and Wagner, Ina (2011) Lest we forget: The European field study tradition and the issue of conditions of work in CSCW research. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW 2011, 24–28 September 2011, Aarhus, Denmark, 213–232.Google Scholar
Barber, Gerald, De Jong, Peter, and Hewitt, Carl (1983) Semantic support for work in organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.Google Scholar
Barbut, S. (2020) Meat industry 4.0: A distant future? Animal Frontiers 10(4), 38–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardzell, Shaowen (2010) Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2010, April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, GA, 1301–1310.Google Scholar
Bardzell, Shaowen (2018) Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barot, Rohit and Bird, John (2001) Racialization: The genealogy and critique of a concept. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(4), 601–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barua, Rukmini (2021) Feminine domesticity and emotions of gender: Work and women in 20th and early 21st century India. L’Homme 32(2), 59–78.Google Scholar
Bath, Corinna (2009) Searching for methodology: Feminist technology design in computer science. In Ernst, W. and Horwath, I. (eds.), Gender in science and technology: Interdisciplinary approaches. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 57–76.Google Scholar
Beane, Matt and Orlikowski, Wanda J. (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organization Science 26(6), 1553–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Dana (2019) Through the looking glass: Women and borderline personality disorder. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker-Schmidt, Regina, Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli, and Schmidt, Beate (1984) Eines ist zuwenig, beides ist zuviel: Erfahrungen von Arbeiterfrauen zwischen Familie und Fabrik. Bonn: Neue Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Beede, Emma, Baylor, Elizabeth, Hersch, Fred, Iurchenko, Anna, Wilcox, Lauren, Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan, and Vardoulakis, Laura M. (2020) A human-centered evaluation of a deep learning system deployed in clinics for the detection of diabetic retinopathy. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2020, April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. New York: ACM Press, 1–12.Google Scholar
BEK (Austrian Bioethics Commission) (2020) The work of physicians at the interface of big data, artificial intelligence and human experience. Wien: Secretariat of the Bioethics Commission.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary Field, Clinchy, Blythe McVicker, Goldberger, Nancy Rule, and Tarule, Jill Mattuck (1986) Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bendl, Regine (2008) Gender subtexts – Reproduction of exclusion in organizational discourse. British Journal of Management 19, S50–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, Patricia (1954) From novice to expert: Power and excellence in nursing practice. Palo Alto, CA: Addison-Wellesley.Google Scholar
Bennett, Cynthia L. and Rosner, Daniela K. (2019) The promise of empathy: Design, disability, and knowing the ‘other’. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2019, May 4–9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. New York: ACM Press, 1–13.Google Scholar
Benschop, Yvonne and Doorewaard, Hans (1998a) Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies 19(5), 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benschop, Yvonne and Doorewaard, Hans (1998b) Six of one and half a dozen of the other: The gender subtext of Taylorism and team‐based work. Gender, Work & Organization 5(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benston, Margaret Lowe (1988) Women’s voices/men’s voices: Technology as language. In Kramarae, C. (ed.), Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 5–28.Google Scholar
Benston, Margaret Lowe (1989) Feminism and system design: Questions of control. In Benston, M. and Tomm, W. (eds.), The effects of feminist approaches on research methodologies. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 205–224.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard and Dourish, Paul (1995) Medium versus mechanism: Supporting collaboration through customisation. In Marmolin, H., Sundblad, Y., and Schmidt, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW’95: 10–14 September 1995, Stockholm, Sweden. Dordrecht: Springer, 133–148.Google Scholar
Berg, Marc (1999) Accumulating and coordinating: Occasions for information technologies in medical work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8, 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Johannes and Offe, Claus (1982) Functionalism vs. rational choice? Some questions concerning the rationality of choosing one or the other. Theory and Society 11(4), 521–526.Google Scholar
Bernays, Marie (1910/2012) Auslese und Anpassung der Arbeiterschaft der geschlossenen Grossindustrie: dargestellt an den Verhältnissen der Gladbacher Spinnerei und Weberei AG zu München-Gladbach im Rheinland. [Edited new edition of the dissertation, printed in Leipzig, 1910 edn.] Schriftenreihe des Fachbereiches Sozialwesen an der Hochschule Niederrhein. Essen: Klartext Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidwell, Nicola J. (2016) Decolonising HCI and interaction design discourse: Some considerations in planning AfriCHI. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 22(4), 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biondi, Gianfranco and Rickards, Olga (2011) L’errore della razza. Avventure e sventure di un mito pericoloso. Roma: Carocci Editore.Google Scholar
Birbaumer, Andrea, Lebano, Adele, Ponzellini, Anna, Tolar, Marianne, and Wagner, Ina (2007) From the margins to a field of opportunities: Life story patterns of women in ICT. Women’s Studies International Forum 30(6), 486–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birbaumer, Andrea, Tolar, Marianne, and Wagner, Ina (2008) Biographical Stories of European Women Working in ICT. In Van Slyke, C. (ed.), Information communication technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. New York: IGI Global, 472–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birhane, Abeba. (2021) Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach. Patterns 2(2), 100201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birke, Linda and Vines, Gail (1987) Beyond nature versus nurture: Process and biology in the development of gender. Women’s Studies International Forum 10(6), 555–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerknes, Gro and Bratteteig, Tone (1986) Florence in wonderland: System development with nurses. Oslo: Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Bjerknes, Gro and Bratteteig, Tone (1988) Computers – Utensils or epaulets? The application perspective revisited. AI & Society 2(3), 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørn, Pernille and Balka, Ellen (2007) Health care categories have politics too: Unpacking the managerial agendas of electronic triage systems. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 24–28 September 2007, Limerick, Ireland. London: Springer, 371–390.Google Scholar
Bjørn, Pernille, Menendez-Blanco, Maria, and Borsotti, Valeria (2022) Diversity in computer science: Design artefacts for equity and inclusion. Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Bjørn, Pernille and Rosner, Daniela K. (2021) Intertextual design: The hidden stories of Atari women. Human–Computer Interaction 37(4), 370–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Jeanette, Giacomi, Jean, Mosher, Andrea and Swenton-Wall, Pat (1993) Ethnographic fieldwork methods and their relation to design. In Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 123–155.Google Scholar
Blomberg, Jeanette and Karasti, Helena (2013) Reflections on 25 years of ethnography in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22(4–6), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Jeanette, Megahed, Aly, and Strong, Ray (2018) Acting on analytics: Accuracy, precision, interpretation, and performativity. In Proceedings of Ethnographic Praxis in Industry EPIC 2018, 10–12 September 2018, Honolulu, HI, 281–300.Google Scholar
Blomberg, Jeanette, Suchman, Lucy, and Trigg, Randall (1996) Reflections on a work-oriented design project. Human-Computer-Interaction 11(3), 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluhm, Robyn (2013) New research, old problems: Methodological and ethical issues in fMRI research examining sex/gender differences in emotion processing. Neuroethics 6(2), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Gisela (1991) Challenging dichotomies: Perspectives on women’s history. In Offen, K.M., Pierson, R.R., and Rendall, J. (eds.), Writing women’s history. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–23.Google Scholar
Bødker, Susanne, Dindler, Christian, and Iversen, Ole Sejer (2017) Tying knots: Participatory infrastructuring at work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26(1–2), 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivie, Inger (2010) Women, men and programming: Knowledge, metaphors and masculinity. In Booth, S., Goodman, S., and Kirkup, G. (eds.), Gender issues in learning and working with information technology: Social constructs and cultural contexts. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 1–24.Google Scholar
Borau, Sylvie, Otterbring, Tobias, Laporte, Sandra, and Fosso Wamba, Samuel (2021) The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI. Psychology & Marketing 38(7), 1052–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsotti, Valeria and Bjørn, Pernille (2022) Humor and stereotypes in computing: An equity-focused approach to institutional accountability. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (JCSCW) 31(4), 771–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossen, Claus, Jensen, Lotte Groth, and Witt, Flemming (2012) Medical secretaries’ care of records: The cooperative work of a non-clinical group. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’12, February 11–15, 2012, Seattle, WA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 921–930.Google Scholar
Bossen, Claus and Markussen, Randi (2010) Infrastructuring and ordering devices in health care: Medication plans and practices on a hospital ward. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 19, 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossen, Claus, Pine, Kathleen H., Cabitza, Federico, Ellingsen, Gunnar, and Piras, Enrico M. (2019) Data work in healthcare: An introduction. Health Informatics Journal 25 (3), 465–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourdage, Monique (2010) ‘A young girl’s dream’: Examining the barriers facing female electric guitarists. IASPM Journal 1(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey and Star, S. Leigh (1999) Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boy, Guy A. (2013) From STEM to STEAM: Toward a human-centred education, creativity & learning thinking. In Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, August 26–28, 2013, Toulouse, France, Article 3, 1–7.Google Scholar
Boyer, Kate and England, Kim (2008) Gender, work and technology in the information workplace: From typewriters to ATMs. Social & Cultural Geography 9(3), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, Maud Anne (2019) Labour, gender and deindustrialisation: Women workers at Fiat (Italy, 1970s–1980s). Contemporary European History 28(4), 484–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, Ennobong Hannah (2016) Introduction. In Branch, E.H. (ed), Pathways, potholes, and the persistence of women in science: Reconsidering the pipeline. Lexington Books, viii–xx.Google Scholar
Bratteteig, Tone (2010) A matter of digital materiality. In Wagner, I., Bratteteig, T., and Stuedahl, D. (eds.), Exploring digital design: Multi-disciplinary design practices. London: Springer, 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratteteig, Tone and Wagner, Ina (2013) Moving healthcare to the home: The work to make homecare work. In ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Paphos: Springer, 141–160.Google Scholar
Bratteteig, Tone and Wagner, Ina (2014) Disentangling participation: Power and decision-making in participatory design. Cham: Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratteteig, Tone and Wagner, Ina (2016) Unpacking the notion of participation in Participatory Design. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 25(6), 425–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, Harry (1974) Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, Dana M. (2000) The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society 14(3), 418–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, Kate and Warren, Dorian T. (2007) Race, gender, and the rebirth of trade unionism. New Labor Forum 16(3/4), 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Brad, Chui, Michael, and Manyika, James (2011) Are you ready for the era of ‘big data’? McKinsey Quarterly 4(1), 24–35.Google Scholar
Brown, Jeffrey, Park, Tina, Chang, Jiyoo, Andrus, Mckane, Xiang, Alice, and Custis, Christine (2022) Attrition of workers with minoritized identities on AI teams. In Suresh, H. and Guttag, J.V. (eds.), Equity and access in algorithms, mechanisms, and optimization EAAMO’22, October 6–9, 2022, Arlington, VA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 1–9.Google Scholar
Brulé, Emeline and Spiel, Katta (2019) Negotiating gender and disability identities in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Transforming Communities C&T 2019, June 3–7, 2019, Vienna, Austria. New York: ACM Press, 218–227.Google Scholar
Brumley, Krista M. (2018) ‘It’s more appropriate for men’: Management and worker perceptions of the gendered ideal worker. Sociological Spectrum 6, 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, Beth, Shively, Kate, Peppler, Kylie, and Wohlwend, Karen (2014) Hands on, hands off: Gendered access in crafting and electronics practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity 21(4), 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buechley, Leah, Eisenberg, Mike, Catchen, Jaime, and Crockett, Ali (2008) The LilyPad Arduino: Using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI2008, April 5–10, 2008, Florence, Italy, 423–432.Google Scholar
Buolamwini, Joy and Gebru, Timnit (2018) Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 8, 77–91.Google Scholar
Burtscher, Sabrina and Spiel, Katta (2020) ‘But where would I even start?’ Developing (gender) sensitivity in HCI research and practice. In Proceedings of the Conference on Mensch und Computer MuC’20, September 6–9, 2020, Magdeburg, Germany, 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Corlann Gee (1983) Women and the assessment of technology: To think, to be; to unthink, to free. In Rothschild, J. (ed.), Machina ex Dea: Feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergamon Press, 150–171.Google Scholar
Butler, Elizabeth Beardsley (1909) Women and the trades: Pittsburgh, 1907–1908. New York: Charities Publications Committee.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1990) Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cabitza, Federico, Ellingsen, Gunnar, Locoro, Angela, and Simone, Carla (2019) Repetita iuvant: Exploring and supporting redundancy in hospital practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28, 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabitza, Federico and Simone, Carla (2017) Malleability in the hands of end-users. In Paternò, F. and Wulf, V. (eds.), New perspectives in end-user development. Cham: Springer, 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, Caitlin (2007) The personal is political: Developing new subjectivities through participatory action research. Gender, Place and Culture 14(3), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel (1979) L’État face à l’innovation technique: le cas du véhicule électrique. Revue française de science politique 29(3), 426–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campreguer França, N., Smit, Dorothé, Wuschitz, Stefanie, and Fuchsberger, Verena (2021) The women* who made it: Experiences from being a woman* at a maker festival. Sustainability 13(16), 9361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canedo, Edna Dias, Bonifácio, Rodrigo, Okimoto, Márcio Vinicius, Serebrenik, Alexander, Pinto, Gustavo, and Monteiro, Eduardo (2020) Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in OSS communities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement ESEM’20, October 8–9, 2020, Bari, Italy. New York: ACM Press, 1–11.Google Scholar
Canedo, Edna Dias, Mendes, Fabiana Freitas, Cerqueira, Anderson Jefferson, Okimoto, Márcio Vinicius, Pinto, Gustavo and Bonifacio, Roberto (2021) Breaking one barrier at a time: How women developers cope in a men-dominated industry. In Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering SBES’21, September 27-October 1, 2021, Joinville, Brazil. New York: ACM Press, 378–387.Google Scholar
Capy, Marcelle and Valette, Aline (1984) Femmes et travail au XIXe siècle: Enquêtes de la Fronde et la Bataille syndicaliste. Paris: Syros.Google Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. (2007) Assembling women: The feminization of global manufacturing. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Carros, F, Schwaninger, Preussner, Randall, Dave, Wieching, Rainer, Fitzpatrick, Geraldine, and Wulf, Volker (2022) Care workers making use of robots: Results of a three-month study on human–robot interaction within a care home. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’22, April 29–May 5, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 1–15.Google Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana (1988) Eguaglianza e differenza sessuale: le amnesie del pensiero politico. In Equality and difference: Gender dimensions in political thought, justice and morality. December 1988. Firenze: European University.Google Scholar
Cedefop (2020) Developing and matching skills in the online platform economy: Findings on new forms of digital work and learning from Cedefop’s CrowdLearn study. Luxembourg: European Center for the Development of Vocational Training.Google Scholar
Chen, Ko-Le, Clarke, Rachel, Almeida, Teresa, Wood, Matthew, and Kirk, David S. (2017) Situated dissemination through an HCI Workplace. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2017, May 6–11, 2017, Denver, CO, USA. New York: ACM Press, 2078–2090.Google Scholar
Chi, Do Quynh and van den Broek, Di (2020) Gendered labour activism in the Vietnamese manufacturing industry. Gender, Work & Organization 27(6), 1145–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilisa, Bagele, Major, Thenjiwe Emily, Gaotlhobogwe, Michael, and Mokgolodi, Hildah (2016) Decolonizing and indigenizing evaluation practice in Africa: Toward African relational evaluation approaches. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 30(3), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivukula, Sai Shruthi (2020) Feminisms through design: A practical guide to implement and extend feminism: Position. Interactions 27(6), 36–39.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Cyd (2019) Build it better: Tinkering in feminist maker pedagogy. Women’s Studies 48(3), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citational Justice Collective: Ahmed, Syed, Amrute, Sareeta, Bardzell, Jeffrey, Bardzell, Shaowen, Bidwell, Nicola, Dillahunt, Tawanna, et al. (2022) Citational justice and the politics of knowledge production. Interactions Sep.–Oct., 79–82.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adele (1991) Social worlds/arena theory as organizational theory. In Maines, D.R. (ed.), Social organization and social processes: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss. Edison, NJ: Aldine Transaction, 119–158.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adele E. (2021) From grounded theory to situational analysis: What’s new? Why? How? In Morse, J.M., Bowers, B.J., Charmaz, K., Corbin, J., Stern, P.N., and Clarke, A.E. (eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation. London and New York: Routlege, 223–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Michael F., Gonzales, Joseph, Harper, Richard, Randall, David, Ludwig, Thomas, and Ikeya, Nozomi (2019) Better supporting workers in ML workplaces. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing CSCW’19, November 9–13, 2019, Austin, TX, USA. New York: ACM Press, 443–448.Google Scholar
Clegg, Sue and Trayhurn, Deborah (2000) Gender and computing: Not the same old problem. British Educational Research Journal 26(1), 75–89.Google Scholar
Clement, Andrew (1990) Cooperative support for computer work: A social perspective on the empowering of end users. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW 90, 7–10 October 1990, Los Angeles, California. New York: ACM Press, 223–236.Google Scholar
Clement, Andrew (1993) Looking for the designers: Transforming the ‘invisible’ infrastructure of computerised office work. AI & Society 7(4), 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, Andrew and Van den Besselaar, Peter (1993) A retrospective look at PD projects. Communications of the ACM 36(6), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (1983a) Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (1983b) Caught in the wheels: The high cost of being a female cog in the male machinery of engineering. Marxism Today (November), 16–20.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (1984) Trade unions and the radicalizing of socialist feminism. Feminist Review 16(1), 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (1985a) Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technical know-how. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (1985b) The material of male power. In MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.), The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 125–146.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia (1993) Technical competence, gender identity and women’s autonomy. Les Cahiers du Genre 7(1), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockburn, Cynthia and Ormrod, Susan (1993) Gender and technology in the making. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark (2010) Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark (2015) The tragedy of the master: Automation, vulnerability, and distance. Ethics and Information Technology 17, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark (2021) Three responses to anthropomorphism in social robotics: Towards a critical, relational, and hermeneutic approach. International Journal of Social Robotics 14(10), 2049–2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Marcy and White, Margaret (1987) Taking control of our future: Clerical workers and new technology. Vancouver: Women’s Skill Development Society, printed by Press Gang Printers and Publishers.Google Scholar
Collett, Clementine and Dillon, Sarah (2019) AI and gender: Four proposals for future research. Cambridge: The Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill (1986) Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems 33(6), s14–s32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill (1990) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill (2017) The difference that power makes: Intersectionality and participatory democracy. Investigaciones Feministas 8 (1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, Robert W. and Messerschmidt, James W. (2005) Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19(6), 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Brittney (2016) Intersectionality. In Disch, L. and Hawkesworth, M. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corneliussen, Hilde G. (2021) Unpacking the Nordic Gender Equality Paradox in ICT research and innovation. Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics 5(2), 25.Google Scholar
Corneliussen, Hilde G., Herman, Clem, and Gajjala, Radhika (2018) ICT changes everything! But who changes ICT? In Kreps, D., Ess, C., Leenen, L., and Kimppa, K. (eds.), This changes everything – ICT and climate change: What can we do? Cham: Springer, 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneliussen, Hilde G. (2021) Women empowering themselves to fit into ICT. In Lechman, E. (ed.), Technology and women’s empowerment. London and New York: Routledge, 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coron, Clotilde (2020) What does ‘gender equality’ mean? Social representations of gender equality in the workplace among French workers. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 39(8), 825–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza-Chock, Sasha (2018) Design justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society DRS, 25–28 June 2018. Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
Couldry, Nick and Mejías, Ulises A. (2019) The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Courtland, Rachel (2018) Bias detectives: The researchers striving to make algorithms fair. Nature 558(7710), 357–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Kevin R. (1997) Introduction. Globalization and its politics in question. In Cox, K.R. (ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local. New York and London: Guilford Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1991) Mapping the margins: Identity politics, intersectionality, and violence against women. Stanford Law Review 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, Rosemary and Reid, Stuart (1982) The deskilling of clerical work. In Wood, S. (ed.), The degradation of work? Skill, deskilling, and the labour process. London: Hutchinson and Co., Publishers.Google Scholar
Crompton, Rosemary and Jones, Gareth (1984) White-collar proletariat: Deskilling and gender in clerical work. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Simon and Bagilhole, Barbara M. (2002) Girls’ jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non‐traditional occupations. Gender, Work & Organization 9(2), 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukier, Wendy, Shortt, Denise, and Devine, Irene (2002) Gender and information technology: Implications of definitions. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34(4), 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Thomas G. (1978) Self-regulating work groups: A socio-technical synthesis. Academy of Management Review 3(3), 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ignazio, Catherine (2019) Four tensions between HCI research, social justice aspirations, and grassroots politics. In CSCW’19 Workshop on Design and the Politics of Collaboration, November 9, 2019, Austin, TX, USA. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
D’Ignazio, Catherine, Hope, Alexis, Michelson, Becky, Churchill, Robyn, and Zuckerman, Ethan (2016) A feminist HCI approach to designing postpartum technologies: ‘When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke’. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’16, May 07–12, 2016, San Jose, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 2612–2622.Google Scholar
D’Ignazio, Catherine and Klein, Lauren F. (2020) Data feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dados, Nour and Connell, Raewyn (2012) The Global South. Contexts 11(1), 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalla Costa, Mariarosa and James, Selma (1973) The power of women and the subversion of the community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
Damodaran, Leela (1996) User involvement in the systems design process: A practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology 15(6), 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Anne and Snaith, Pauline A. (1980) Mealtime problems in a continuing care hospital for the elderly. Age and Ageing 9(2), 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Sarah R. (2017) Hackerspaces: Making the maker movement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
De Laurentis, Teresa (1991) Queer theory: Lesbian and gay sexualities. An introduction. differences 3(2), iii–xviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Oliveira Lobo, Mory Márcia, Da Silva Figueiredo Medeiros Ribeiro, Karen, and Maciel, Cristiano (2019) Black women in computing and technology: Identity affirmation and resistance. CLEIEJ Electronic Journal 22(2).Google Scholar
De Stefano, Valerio (2015) The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37, 471–504.Google Scholar
De Wilde, Mandy (2021) ‘A heat pump needs a bit of care’: On maintainability and repairing gender–technology relations. Science, Technology, & Human Values 46(6), 1261–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, Sarah E., Zoller, Heather M., and Hunt, Kathleen P. (2022) The meatpacking industry’s corporate exceptionalism: Racialized logics of food chain worker disposability during the COVID-19 crisis. Food, Culture & Society (February), 1–20.Google Scholar
Dencik, Lina, Hintz, Arne, Redden, Joanna, and Treré, Emiliano (2019) Exploring data justice: Conceptions, applications and directions. Information, Communication & Society 22(7), 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denissen, Amy M. (2010) The right tools for the job: Constructing gender meanings and identities in the male-dominated building trades. Human Relations 63(7), 1051–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessors, Dominique, Teiger, Catherine, Laville, Antoine, and Gadbois, Charles (1979) Conditions de travail des opératrices des renseignements téléphoniques et conséquences sur leur santé et leur vie personnelle et sociale. Archives des maladies professionnelles, de médecine du travail et de Sécurité Sociale 40(3–4), 469–500.Google Scholar
Dhar-Bhattacharjee, Sunrita and Richardson, Helen (2018) A tour of India in one workplace: Investigating complex and gendered relations in IT. Information Technology & People 31(2), 578–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz Andrade, Antonio, Techatassanasoontorn, Angsana A., Singh, Harminder, and Staniland, Nimbus (2021) Indigenous cultural re‐presentation and re‐affirmation: The case of Māori IT professionals. Information Systems Journal 31(6), 803–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrosovestnova, Anna, Hannibal, Glenda, and Reinboth, Tim (2021) Service robots for affective labor: A sociology of labor perspective. AI & Society 37, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dombrowski, Lynn, Harmon, Ellie, and Fox, Sarah (2016) Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems DIS 2016, June 4–8, 2016, Brisbane, Australia. New York: ACM Press, 656–671.Google Scholar
Donia, Joseph and Shaw, James A. (2021) Ethics and values in design: A structured review and theoretical critique. Science and Engineering Ethics 27(5), Article 57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dotson, Kristie (2011) Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26(2), 236–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Susan J. (1999) Listening In: Radio and the American imagination. New York: New York Times Books.Google Scholar
Dourish, Paul (2016) Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society 3(2), Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draude, Claude, Klumbyte, Goda, Lücking, Phillip, and Treusch, Pat (2020) Situated algorithms: A sociotechnical systemic approach to bias. Online Information Review 44 (2), 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draude, Claude and Maaß, Susanne (2018) Making IT work: Integrating gender research in computing through a process model. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, 14–15 May 2018, Heilbronn, Germany. New York: ACM Press, 43–50.Google Scholar
Dublin, Thomas (1979) Women at work: The transformation of work and community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826–1860. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
DuBois, L. Zachary and Shattuck‐Heidorn, Heather (2021) Challenging the binary: Gender/sex and the bio‐logics of normalcy. American Journal of Human Biology 33(5), e23623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumais, Lucia, Messing, Karen, Seifert, Ana Maria, Courville, Julie, and Vezina, Nicole (1993) Make me a cake as fast as you can: Forces for and against change in the sexual division of labour at an industrial bakery. Work, Employment and Society 7(3), 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar-Hester, Christina (2008) Geeks, meta-geeks, and gender trouble: Activism, identity, and low-power FM radio. Social Studies of Science 38(2), 201–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar-Hester, Christina (2014) Radical inclusion? Locating accountability in technical DIY. In Ratto, M. and Boler, M. (eds.), DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duraffourg, Jacques, Guérin, Francois, Jankowsky, Frances, and Mascot, J.-C. (1976) Analyse ergonomique du travail dans un atelier de presses en vue du transfert de certaines presses dans un nouvel atelier à construire. Montrouge, Paris: Ministère du travail, Agence Nationale pour L’amélioration des Conditions de Travail (ANACT) & Laboratoire de Physiologie du Travail et d’Ergonomie du CNAM.Google Scholar
Durndell, A., Cameron, C., Knox, A., Stocks, R., and Haag, Z. (1997) Gender and computing: West and East Europe. Computers in Human Behavior 13(2), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutt-Ballerstadt, Reshmi (2018) Are you supporting white supremacy? McMinnville, OR: Linfield.Google Scholar
Dutta, Madhumita (2019) Becoming factory workers: Understanding women’s geographies of work through life stories in Tamil Nadu, India. Gender, Place & Culture 26(6), 888–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehn, Pelle (1988) Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Information Processing, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Ehn, Pelle and Kyng, Morten (1985) A tool perspective on design of interactive computer support for skilled workers. DAIMI Report Series (PB-190).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elish, Madeleine Clare and Anne Watkins, Elizabeth (2020) Repairing innovation: A study of integrating AI in clinical care. New York: Data & Society.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Kajsa (1995) The creation of a new production system at the Volvo automobile assembly plant at Uddevalla, Sweden. In Sandberg, A. (ed.), Enriching production: Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Aldershot: Avebury, 17–59.Google Scholar
Ely, Robin J. and Meyerson, Debra E. (2010) An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Research in Organizational Behavior 30, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Yrjö (1999) Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Paula and Dunn, Dana (1988) Evaluating work and comparable worth. Annual Review of Sociology 14(1), 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensmenger, Nathan (2010) Making programming masculine. In Misa, T.J. (ed.), Gender codes: Why women are leaving computing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdheim, Mario (1984) Die gesellschaftliche Produktion von Unbewußtheit. Frankfurt a. Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Erete, Sheena, Rankin, Yolanda A., and Thomas, Jakita O. (2021) I can’t breathe: Reflections from Black women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 4(CSCW3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveline, Joan (1994) ‘Normalization’, ‘leading ladies’, and ‘free men’: Affirmative actions in Sweden and Australia. Women’s Studies International Forum 17(2/3), 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Wendy (2000) The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for ‘making gender stick’ to engineers. Science, Technology, & Human Values 25(1), 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Wendy. (2001) The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum 24(1), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, Wendy (2007) ‘Nuts and bolts and people’. Gender troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science 37(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1985) The new research on women: How does it affect the natural sciences? Women’s Studies Quarterly 13(2), 30–32.Google Scholar
Federici, Silvia (1975/2014) The reproduction of labour power in the global economy and the unfinished feminist revolution. In Atzeni, M. (ed.), Workers and labour in a globalised capitalism: Contemporary themes and theoretical issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 85–110.Google Scholar
Feldberg, Roslyn L. (1984) Comparable worth: Toward theory and practice in the United States. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 10(2), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldberg, Roslyn (1990) Computers in hospital care: A view of developments in the USA. In Dimitz, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Computers in Hospital Care. Wien, Austria: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Feldberg, Roslyn L. (1992) Comparable worth and nurses in the USA. In Kahn, P. and Meehan, E. (eds.), Equal value/comparable worth in the UK and the USA. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldberg, Roslyn L. and Glenn, Evelyn Nakano (1983) Incipient workplace democracy among United States clerical workers. Economic and Industrial Democracy 4(1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldfeber, Ivana, Quiroga, Yasmin B., Clarissa, Guevara, and Ciolfi Felice, Marianela (2022) Feminisms in Artificial Intelligence: Automation tools towards a feminist judiciary reform in Argentina and Mexico. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VKeeSdJz6-8DoEbetQ8f1wTH1ORqvIXV/viewGoogle Scholar
Fenech, Angel Ellul, Kanji, Shireen, and Vargha, Zsuzsanna (2021) Gender‐based exclusionary practices in performance appraisal. Gender, Work & Organization 29(2), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferryman, Kadijaand and Pitcan, Mikaela (2018) Fairness in precision medicine: What are the risks, benefits, and harms of precision medicine? New York: Data and Society.Google Scholar
Fiesler, Casey, Morrison, Shannon, and Bruckman, Amy S. (2016) An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’16, May 07–12, 2016, San Jose, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 2574–2585.Google Scholar
Fine, Lisa M. (1993) ‘Our big factory family’: Masculinity and paternalism at the Reo Motor Car Company of Lansing, Michigan. Labor History 34(2–3), 274–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firestone, Shulamith (1970) The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: William Morrow and Company.Google Scholar
Fisher, Berenice and Tronto, Joan C. (1990) Toward a feminist theory of caring. In Abel, E.K. and Nelson, M.K. (eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 35–62.Google Scholar
Fiske, Amelia, Prainsack, Barbara, and Buyx, Alena (2019) Data work: Meaning-making in the era of data-rich medicine. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21(7), e11672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzpatrick, Geraldine (2004) Integrated care and the working record. Health Informatics Journal 10(4), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florman, S. (1976) The existential pleasures of engineering. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1979) Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Freeman, Carla (1993) Designing women: Corporate discipline and Barbados’s off-shore pink-collar sector. Cultural Anthropology 8(2), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, John D. and James, Daniel (1997) The gendered worlds of Latin American women workers: From household and factory to the union hall and ballot box. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, Karen A. (1990) Women and computing. Communications of the ACM 33(11), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Batya and Nissenbaum, Helen (1996) Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14(3), 330–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantt, M. and Nardi, B.A. (1992) Gardeners and gurus: Cooperation among CAD users. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 92 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference June 3–7, 1992, Monterey, California. New York: ACM Press, 107–117.Google Scholar
Garcia Johnson, Caroline Pia and Otto, Kathlees (2019) Better together: A model for women and LGBTQ equality in the workplace. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Johannes and Wagner, Ina (1996) Mapping actors and agenda: Political frameworks of design & participation. Human–Computer Interaction (11), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gender, Advisory Group for (2016) For a better integration of the gender dimension in the Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018–2020.Google Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia (1996) Gendered organizational cultures: Narratives of women travellers in a male world. Gender, Work & Organization 3(4), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano and Feldberg, Roslyn L. (1977) Degraded and deskilled: The proletarianization of clerical work. Social Problems 25(1), 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn Nakamo and Feldberg, Roslyn L. (1983) Technology and work degradation: Effects of office automation on women clerical workers. In Rothschild, J. (ed.), Machina ex Dea: Feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergamon Press, 52–64.Google Scholar
Gluck, Sherna Berger and Patai, Daphne (eds.) (1991) Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goan, Melanie Beals (2001) Reviewed work(s): Devices and desires: Gender, technology, and American nursing by Margarete Sandelowski. The Register of the Kentucky Historical Society 99(2), 195–197.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Lisa S. (2003) Commitment, community; and passion: Dimensions of a care-centered approach to teacher education. Teacher Education and Practice 15(1/2), 36–56.Google Scholar
Goodman, Benny (2016) Lying to ourselves: Rationality, critical reflexivity, and the moral order as ‘structured agency’. Nursing Philosophy 17, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodrich, Kristopher, Luke, Melissa, and Smith, Aaron (2016) Queer humanism: Toward an epistemology of socially just, culturally responsive change. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 56(6), 612–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govier, Trudy (1992) Trust, distrust, and feminist theory. Hypatia 7(1), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Joanne and Witt, Alice (2021) A feminist data ethics of care framework for machine learning: The what, why, who and how. First Monday 26(12), Article 11833.Google Scholar
Gray, Mary L. and Suri, Siddharth (2017) The humans working behind the AI curtain. Harvard Business Review 9, 2–5.Google Scholar
Gray, Mary L., Suri, Siddharth, Ali, Syed Shoaib, and Kulkarni, Deepti (2016) The crowd is a collaborative network. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing CSCW ‘16, February 27–March 02, 2016, San Francisco, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 134–147.Google Scholar
Green, Eileen, Owen, Jenny, and Pain, Den (1993) Gendered by Design? Information technology and office systems. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Joan (1990) The head and the heart: Using gender analysis to study the social construction of computer systems. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 20(2), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Joan (1995) Windows on the workplace: Computers, jobs, and the organization of office work in the late 20th century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, Melissa (2015) Inside the data spectacle. Television & New Media 16(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Judith and Nussbaum, Karen (1982) Race against time: Automation of the office: An analysis of the trends in office automation and the impact on the office workforce. Office: Technology and People 1, 197–236.Google Scholar
Grønsund, Tor and Aanestad, Margunn (2020) Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 29(2), 101614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, Ewa (1994) Att våga väga jämnt: om kvalifikationer och kvinnliga förhållningssätt i ett tekniskt industriarbete [Daring to be equal: On qualifications and skills and women’s ways of relating to work in a technical industrial field). Dissertation, Luleå Technical University.Google Scholar
Gupta, Namrata (2020) Women in science and technology: Confronting inequalities. New Delhi: Sage Publications India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurumurthy, Anita, Zainab, Khawla, and Sanjay, Sadhana (2021) The macro frames of microwork: A study of Indian women workers on AMT in the post-pandemic moment. IT for Change. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3872428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, Diana L. and Brunger, Fern (2014) Ethics, ‘vulnerability’, and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qualitative Health Research 24(7), 997–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutierrez, Miren (2021) Algorithmic gender bias and audiovisual data: A research agenda. International Journal of Communication 15, 439–461.Google Scholar
Guzman, Indira R. and Stanton, Jeffrey M. (2008) Women’s adaptation to the IT culture. Women’s Studies 37(3), 202–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Sally (1981) The culture of engineering: Women, workplace and machine. Women’s Studies International Quarterly 4(3), 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Sally (1989) Pleasure, power and technology: Some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Haigh, Thomas (2006) Remembering the office of the future: The origins of word processing and office automation. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 28(4), 6–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hales, Mike and O’Hara, Peter (1993) Strengths and weaknesses of participation: Learning by doing in local government. In Green, E., Owen, J., and Pain, D. (eds.), Gendered by design? Information technology and office systems. London: Taylor & Francis, 153–172.Google Scholar
Hall, Elizabeth Dorrance and Gettings, Patricia E. (2020) ‘Who is this little girl they hired to work here?’ Women’s experiences of marginalizing communication in male-dominated workplaces. Communication Monographs 87(4), 484–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Lucy B. and Clapton, William (2021) Programming the machine: Gender, race, sexuality, AI, and the construction of credibility and deceit at the border. Internet Policy Review 10(4), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Lelia Marie (2021) Black feminist musings on algorithmic oppression. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’21), March 3–10, 2021, Virtual Event, Canada. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Handel, Michael J. (2004) Implications of information technology for employment, skills, and wages: Findings from sectoral and case study research. Arlington, VA: SRI International.Google Scholar
Hankivsky, Olena (2014) Rethinking care ethics: On the promise and potential of an intersectional analysis. American Political Science Review 108(2), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, Caroline (2014) Putting the bias in skill-biased technological change? A relational perspective on white-collar automation at General Electric. American Behavioral Scientist 58(3), 400–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna (1990) A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980’s. In Nicholson, L.J. (ed.), Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 191–233.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1986a) The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1986b) The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs 11 (4), 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1992) Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? The Centennial Review 36(3), 437–470.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra (2009) Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: Convergences and dissonances. Postcolonial Studies 12(4), 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, Ellie and Silberman, M. Six (2019) Rating working conditions on digital labor platforms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28(5), 911–960.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christina, Erete, Sheena, and Piper, Anne Marie (2019) Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 3(CSCW), Article 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Christina N. (2020) The forgotten margins: What is community-based participatory health design telling us? Interactions 27(3), 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Gillian R. (2011) The relationship of action research to human–computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18(3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedditch, Sonali and Vyas, Dhaval (2023) Design justice in practice: Community-led design of an online maker space for refugee and migrant women. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 7(GROUP), Article 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenreich, Martin (1997) Arbeitsorganisation und Qualifikation. In Luczak, H. and Volpert, W. (eds.), Handbuch Arbeitswissenschaft. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Pöschl, 696–701.Google Scholar
Henson, Kevin D. and Rogers, Jackie Krasas (2001) ‘Why Marcia you’ve changed!’ Male clerical temporary workers doing masculinity in a feminized occupation. Gender & Society 15(2), 218–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewamanne, Sandya (2018) Sewing their way up the social ladder? Paths to social mobility and empowerment among Sri Lanka’s global factory workers. Third World Quarterly 39(11), 2173–2187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Marie (2010) Meritocracy and feminization in conflict: computerization in the British Government. In Misa, T. J. (ed.), Gender codes: Why women are leaving computing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsley, Francis Harry and Strip, Alan (2001) Codebreakers: The inside story of Bletchley Park. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschauer, Stefan (2016) Judith, Niklas und das Dritte der Geschlechterdifferenz: undoing gender und die post gender studies. GENDER–Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft 8(3), 114–129.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. (2018) Care as a political concept: Now more than ever. Politics and Gender 14(4), 4–8.Google Scholar
Hirsh, Elizabeth, Olson, Gary A., and Harding, Sandra (1995) Starting from marginalized lives: A conversation with Sandra Harding. JAC 15(2), 193–225.Google Scholar
Hirshbein, Laura D. (2006) Science, gender, and the emergence of depression in American psychiatry, 1952–1980. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 61(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochschild, Arlie Russel (1983) The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Holgersson, Charlotte and Romani, Laurence (2020) Tokenism revisited: When organizational culture challenges masculine norms, the experience of token is transformed. European Management Review 17(3), 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holth, Line (2014) Passionate men and rational women: Gender contradictions in engineering. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies 9(2), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoogeveen, Teresa (2021) Fracturing the private–public divide through action. Reading Les Cahier du Grif. Ethics, Politics & Society 4, 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornecker, Eva, Bischof, Andreas, Graf, Philipp, Franzkowiak, Lena, and Krüger, Norbert (2020) The interactive enactment of care technologies and its implications for human–robot–interaction in care. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society NordiCHI’20, October 25–29, 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. New York: ACM Press, Article 78.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Roger (1997) ‘Where men will not work’: Gender, power, space, and the sexual division of labor in America’s meatpacking industry, 1890–1990. Technology and Culture 38(1), 187–213.Google Scholar
Houben, Steven and Bardram, Jakob E. (2013) Activitydesk: Multi-device configuration work using an interactive desk. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 27 April–2 May 2013, Paris, France. New York: ACM Press, 721–726.Google Scholar
Howard, Dorothy and Irani, Lilly C. (2019) Ways of knowing when research subjects care. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2019, May 4–9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. New York: ACM Press, Article 97.Google Scholar
Hughes, Karen D. (1989) Office automation: A review of the literature. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 44(3), 654–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, John A., Sharrock, Wes W., Rodden, Tom A., O’Brien, Jo, Rouncefield, Mark, and Calvey, Dave (1994) Perspectives on the social organisation of work. In Hughes, J.A. et al. (eds.), Field studies and CSCW. Lancaster: Computing Department, Lancaster University, 129–160.Google Scholar
Hunter, Alison (2012) The professionalisation of computing work in New Zealand, 1960 to 2010: A feminist analysis. Doctoral thesis, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary (2006) Discrimination in IT organisations. Labour & Industry: a Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 16(3), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Benesch, Henric, and Geib, Jon (2017) Institutioning: Participatory design, co-design and the public realm. CoDesign 13(3), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibáñez, Marta (2017) Women in the construction trades: Career types and associated barriers. Women’s Studies International Forum 60, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO (2000) ABC of women workers’ rights and gender equality. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
ILO (2021) The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Irani, Lilly C. and Silberman, M. Six (2013) Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2013, April 27–May 2, 2013, Paris, France. New York: ACM Press, 611–620.Google Scholar
Irani, Lilly C. and Silberman, M. Six (2016) Stories we tell about labor: Turkopticon and the trouble with design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’16, May 07–12, 2016, San Jose, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 4573–4586.Google Scholar
Isaksson, Anna, Börjesson, Emma, Gunn, Maja, Andersson, Camilla, and Ehrnberger, Karin (2017) Norm critical design and ethnography: Possibilities, objectives and stakeholders. Sociological Research Online 22(4), 232–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isbister, Katherine (2004) Instrumental sociality: How machines reflect to us our own inhumanity. In Workshop Dimensions of Sociality: Shaping Relationships with Machines. Vienna: Institute of Philosophy of Science, University of Vienna and Austrian Institute for Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
Ismail, Azra and Kumar, Neha (2018) Engaging solidarity in data collection practices for community health. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 2(CSCW), Article 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Gabriele (2019) The female problem: How male bias in medical trials ruined women’s health. The Guardian, Nov. 13.Google Scholar
Jackson, Steven J., Pompe, Alex, and Krieshok, Gabriel (2012) Repair worlds: Maintenance, repair, and ICT for development in rural Namibia. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’12, Seattle, WA, USA – February 11–15, 2012. New York: ACM Press, 107–116.Google Scholar
Jackson, Terence (2013) Reconstructing the indigenous in African management research: Implications for international management studies in a globalized world. Management International Review 53, 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Ursula and Weltz, Friedrich (1981) Zum Problem der Beanspruchung beim Maschinenschreiben. In Frese, M. (ed.), Stress im Büro. Bern: Huber, 80–198.Google Scholar
Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, Sutherland, Will, Nelson, Sarah Beth, and Sawyer, Steve (2020) Platformic management, boundary resources for gig work, and worker autonomy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29(1), 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Fiona and Smith, Julie (2021) Work-from-home during COVID-19: Accounting for the care economy to build back better. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 32(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Zhouying (2005) Global technological change: From hard technology to soft technology. Bristol: Intellect Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Janet, Morell, Ildikó Asztalos, and Lindell, Eva (2020) Gendering the digitalized metal industry. Gender, Work & Organization 27(6), 1321–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Hans (1979) Toward a philosophy of technology. Hastings Center Report 9(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Hans (1984) The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jussupow, Ekaterina, Spohrer, Kai, and Heinzl, Armin (2022) Radiologists’ usage of diagnostic AI systems: The role of diagnostic self-efficacy for sensemaking from confirmation and disconfirmation. Business & Information Systems Engineering 64(3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafai, Yasmin B. and Burke, Quinn (2014) Connected code: Why children need to learn programming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafai, Yasmin B. and Peppler, Kylie A. (2014) Transparency reconsidered: Creative, critical, and connected making with e-textiles. In Ratto, M. and Boler, M. (eds.), DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katyal, Sonia K. and Jung, Jessica Y. (2021) The gender panopticon: AI, gender, and design Justice. U.C.L.A. Law Review 68, 692–785.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn F. (1982) Feminism and science. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 7(3), 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn F. (1985) Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn F. (1987) The gender/science system: Or, is sex to gender as nature is to science? Hypatia 2(3), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox (1993) A feeling for the organism. The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Kendall, Lori (1999) Nerd nation: Images of nerds in US popular culture. International Journal of Cultural Studies 2(2), 260–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy-Macfoy, Madeleine, Gausi, Tamara, and King, Chidi (2021) When a movement moves within a movement: Black women’s feminist activism within trade unions. Gender & Development 29(2/3), 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Etlyn J. and Donnelly, Rory (2020) Navigating the gender structure in information technology: How does this affect the experiences and behaviours of women? Human Relations 73(3), 326–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Horst and Schumann, Michael (1970) Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewußtsein: Eine empirische Untersuchung über den Einfluß der aktuellen technischen Entwicklung auf die industrielle Arbeit und das Arbeiterbewußtsein. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Keyes, Os, May, Chandler, and Carrell, Annabelle (2021) You keep using that word: Ways of thinking about gender in computing research. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 5(CSCW1), Article 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khenner, Evgeniy K. (2019) Women in computing. In Frieze, C. and Quesenberry, J.L. (eds.), Cracking the digital ceiling: Women in computing around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 246–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Claire Jean (2004) Unyielding positions: A critique of the ‘race’ debate. Ethnicities 4(3), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Pauline T. (2017) Data-driven discrimination at work. William & Mary Law Review 857(3), 857–936.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung-Kyung (1996) ‘Big companies don’t hire us, married women’: Exploitation and empowerment among women workers in South Korea. Feminist Studies 22(3), 555–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissler, Leo and Sattel, Ulrike (1982) Humanization of work and social interests: Description and critical assessment of the state-sponsored program of humanization in the Federal Republic of Germany. Economic and Industrial Democracy 3(3), 221–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitchin, Rob (2014) The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kitwood, Tom and Brooker, Dawn (2019) Dementia reconsidered revisited: The person still comes first. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Klinge, Ineke (2010) Sex and gender in biomedicine: Promises for women and men. How incorporation of sex and gender in research will lead to a better health care. In Klinge, I. and Wiesemann, C. (eds.), Sex and gender in biomedicine. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinge, Ineke and Bosch, Mineke (2005) Transforming research methodologies in EU life sciences and biomedicine: Gender-sensitive ways of doing research. European Journal of Women’s Studies 12(3), 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klumbytè, Goda, Draude, Claude, and Taylor, Alex S. (2022) Critical tools for machine learning: Working with intersectional critical concepts in machine learning systems design. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT’22), June 21–24, 2022, Seoul, Republic of Korea. New York: ACM Press, 1528–1541.Google Scholar
Kohl, Karina and Prikladnicki, Rafael (2018) Perceptions on diversity in Brazilian agile software development teams: A survey. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering GE ‘18, 28 May 2018, Gothenburg Sweden. New York: ACM Press, 37–40.Google Scholar
Koller, Eva (2022) The impact of the fourth industrial revolution on potentially disadvantaged groups: An analysis of how industry 4.0 can promote decent work and equality for women and older employees. Masters thesis, Department of Economic History and International Relations, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kompast, Martin and Wagner, Ina (1997) Telework: Managing spatial, temporal and cultural boundaries. In Jackson, P. and Wielen, J.v.d. (eds.), New international perspectives on telework: From telecommuting to the virtual organisation. London: Routledge Kegan, 95–117.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris (ed.) (1988) Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Krogh, Anders (2008) What are artificial neural networks? Nature Biotechnology 26(2), 195–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krüger, Max, Weibert, Anne, Leal, Debora de Castro, Randall, Dave, and Wulf, Volker (2021) ‘What is the topic of the group, please?’ On migration, care and the challenges of participation in design. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 5(CSCW2), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, Max, Weibert, Anne, Leal, Débora de Castro, Randall, Dave, and Wulf, Volker (2021) It takes more than one hand to clap: On the role of ‘care’ in maintaining design results. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’21, May 8–13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. New York: ACM Press, Article 302.Google Scholar
Kunda, Gideon (1992) Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ladwig, Robin C. (2012) Silenced and invisible work experience of trans* and gender diverse individuals in intersectional identity relation. In Sojo, V., Wheeler, M. and Ryan, M. (eds.) Proceedings of Gender and Sexuality at Work: A Multidisciplinary Research and Engagement Conference, Feb 18, 2020, Melbourne, Australia, 71–77.Google Scholar
Lake, Danielle and Wendland, Joel (2018) Practical, epistemological, and ethical challenges of participatory action research: A cross-disciplinary review of the literature. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 22(3), 11–42.Google Scholar
Lamoureux, Diane (2010) Pensées rebelles: Autour de Rosa Luxembourg, Hannah Arendt et Françoise Collin. Montreal: Éditions du Remue-ménage.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Marvin, Borning, Alan, and Wulf, Volker (2019) The high cost of free services: Problems with surveillance capitalism and possible alternatives for IT infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computing within Limits (LIMITS 2019), June 10–11, 2019, Lappeenranta, Finland. New York: ACM Press, Article 3.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Marvin, Borning, Alan, and Wulf, Volker (2023) Problems with surveillance capitalism and possible alternatives for IT infrastructure. Information, Communication & Society 26(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, Ellen (1989) Minding matters: The consequences of mindlessness-mindfulness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 22, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappe, Lothar (1981) Die Arbeitssituation erwerbstätiger Frauen. Geschlechtsspezifische Arbeitsmarktsegmentation und ihre Folgen. Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Larsen, Ann‐Claire (2005) In the public interest: Autonomy and resistance to methods of standardising nurses’ advice and practices from a health call centre in Perth, Western Australia. Nursing Inquiry 12(2), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latour, Bruno (2007) Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, Francis (1997) A review on the use of action research in information systems studies. In Lee, A.S, Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research, 31st May–3rd June 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Boston: Springer, 31–68.Google Scholar
Laville, Antoine, Teiger, Catherine, and Duraffourg, Jacques (1972) Conséquences du travail répétitif sous cadence sur la santé des travailleurs et les accidents. Paris: Collection du Laboratoire de Physiologie du Travail et d’Ergonomie du Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers.Google Scholar
Leach, Belinda. J. (2016) Jobs for women? Gender and class in Ontario’s ruralized automotive manufacturing industry. In Pini, B. and Leach, B. (eds.), Reshaping gender and class in rural spaces. Franham: Ashgate, 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, Debora de Castro, Strohmayer, Angelika, and Krüger, Max (2021) On activism and academia: Reflecting together and sharing experiences among critical friends. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’21, May 8–13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. New York: ACM Press, Article 303.Google Scholar
Lee, Una, Mutiti, Nontsikelelo, Garcia, Carlos, and Taylor, Wes (eds.) (2016) Principles for design justice. Design Justice. Zine 1. Detroit: Design Justice Network. http://designjusticenetwork.org/zine.Google Scholar
Leighton, Mary and Roberts, Elizabeth F. (2020) Trust/distrust in multi-disciplinary collaboration: Some feminist reflections. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6(2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, Nina E., Mohun, Arwen Palmer, and Oldenziel, Ruth (1997) Versatile tools: Gender analysis and the history of technology. Technology and Culture 38(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesi, Onoja Barine (2020) Office automation and secretarial productivity in Rivers State University. American International Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 1(1), 22–34.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jen (2015) Barriers to women’s involvement in hackspaces and makerspaces. Project report. The University of Sheffield (unpublished).Google Scholar
Lewis, Patricia, Benschop, Yvonne, and Simpson, Ruth (2017) Postfeminism, gender and organization. Gender, Work and Organization 24(3), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Patricia and Simpson, Ruth (eds.) (2010) Revealing and concealing gender: Issues of visibility in organizations. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Ruth, Sharp, Elizabeth, Remnant, Jennifer, and Redpath, Rhiannon (2015) ‘Safe spaces’: Experiences of feminist women-only space. Sociological Research Online 20(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, Merete and Rasmussen, Bente (1985) Office work and skills. In Olerup, A., Schneider, L. and Monod, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.1 First Working Conference on Women, Work, and Computerization, 17–21 September 1984, Riva Del Sole, Italy. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 43–52.Google Scholar
Lie, Merete and Sørensen, Knut H. (eds.) (1996) Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Olso: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Henry, Paternò, Fabio, Klann, Markus, and Wulf, Volker (2006) End-user development: An emerging paradigm. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liff, Sonia and Wajcman, Judy (1996) ‘Sameness’ and ‘difference’ revisited: Which way forward for equal opportunity initiatives? Journal of Management Studies 33(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Jennifer S. (1999) When computers were women. Technology and Culture 40(3), 455–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, Hilde (2019) An invitation to feminist ethics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lips, Hilary M. (2017) Sex and gender: An introduction. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. (2005) Feminist citizenship theory: An alternative perspective on understanding women’s social and political lives. In Franklin, J. (ed.), Women and social capital. London: Families & Social Capital ESRC Research Group London, South Bank University, 18–26.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia (1992) The meaning of domestic technologies. In Silverstone, R. and Hirsch, E. (eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London and New York: Routledge, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobato, Mirta Zaida (1997) Women workers in the ‘cathedrals of corned beef’: Structure and subjectivity in the Argentine meatpacking industry. In French, J.D. and James, D. (eds.), The gendered worlds of Latin American women workers: From household and factory to the union hall and ballot box. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 53–71.Google Scholar
Lobato, Mirta Zaida (2001) La vida en las fábricas. Trabajo, protesta y política en una comunidad obrera, Berisso (1904–1970). Buenos Aires, Argentinia: Prometeo libros.Google Scholar
Loch-Drake, Cynthia (2007) ‘A special breed’: Packing men and the class and racial politics of manly discourses in post-1945 Edmonton, Alberta. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice 32(1), 136–147.Google Scholar
Lokatt, Erika, Holgersson, Charlotte, Lindgren, Monica, Packendorff, Johann, and Hagander, Louise (2019) An interprofessional perspective on healthcare work: Physicians and nurses co-constructing identities and spaces of action. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–17.Google Scholar
Lowe, Graham S. (1987) Women in the administrative revolution: The feminization of clerical work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lubar, Steven (1992) ‘Do not fold, spindle or mutilate’: A cultural history of the punch card. Journal of American Culture 15, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucier, Brandi Lyn (2001) From ‘Chrysler girls’ to ‘Dodge boys’: The emergence of women in Windsor’s automotive industry, 1964–1976. Windsor, ON: University of Windsor.Google Scholar
Luxton, Meg (2001) Feminism as a class act: Working-class feminism and the women’s movement in Canada. Labour/Le Travailleur 48, 63–88.Google Scholar
Lynch, Casey R., Bissell, David, House-Peters, Lily A., and Del Casino, Vincent J. Jr. (2022) Robotics, affective displacement, and the automation of care. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112(3), 684–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Ning F., Rivera, Veronica A., Yao, Zheng, and Yoon, Dongwook (2022) ‘Brush it off’: How women workers manage and cope with bias and harassment in gender-agnostic gig platforms. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’22), April 29–May 5, 2022, New Orleans, USA. New York: ACM Press, Article 397.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie (2000) Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald and Wajcman, Judy (eds.) (1985) The social shaping of technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Maffía, Diana (2007) Epistemología feminista: la subversión semiótica de las mujeres en la ciencia. Revista venezolana de estudios de la mujer 12(28), 63–98.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael S. (1992) Computers and mathematics: The search for a discipline of computer science. In Echeverria, J., Ibarra, A., and Mormann, T. (eds.), The space of mathematics. Philosophical, epistemological, and historical explorations. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahtani, Minelle (2001) Racial remappings: The potential of paradoxical space. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 8(3), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maji, Sucharita and Dixit, Shikha (2020) Gendered processes and women’s stunted career growth: An exploratory study of female software engineers. The Qualitative Report 25(8), 3067–3084.Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Maarit (2006) Digital empowerment as a process for enhancing citizens’ participation. E-Learning and Digital Media 3(3), 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. (1981) Machiavelli’s political science. The American Political Science Review 75(2), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Sharon (2005) Queer theory for everyone: A review essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 31(1), 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaret, Wright (1972) I want the right to be Black and me. In Lerner, G. (ed.), Black women in white America. New York: Random House, 608–609.Google Scholar
Margolis, Jane and Fisher, Allan (2002) Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marschall, Daniel and Gregory, Judith (eds.) (1983) Office Automation, Jekyll or Hyde? Highlights of the International Conference on Office Work & New Technology. Cleveland, OH: 9to5 Working Women Education Fund.Google Scholar
Marsden, Nicola and Haag, Maren (2016) Stereotypes and politics: Reflections on personas. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’16, May 07–12, 2016, San Jose, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 4017–4031.Google Scholar
Martin, Patrick and Bouchard, Louise (2020) Constraints, normative ideal, and actions to foster change in the practice of nursing: A qualitative study. Advances in Nursing Science 43(3), 306–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, Leo (2010) Technology: The emergence of a hazardous concept. Technology and Culture 51(3), 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matilal, Oindrila (2020) Time matters: Flexi-time and women’s retention in the 24/7 workplace. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The International Venue on Practice-centred Computing on the Design of Cooperation Technologies Siegen, Germany, 13–7 June 2020. Exploratory paper. Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies. Available at https://dl.eusset.eu/handle/20.500.12015/3413Google Scholar
McIntyre, Jonathan R.S., Burton, Candace, and Holmes, Dave (2020) From discipline to control in nursing practice: A poststructuralist reflection. Nursing Philosophy 21(4), e12317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, Jessica, Maalsen, Sophia, and Grech, Alana (2016) Learning about feminism in digital spaces: Online methodologies and participatory mapping. Australian Geographer 47(2), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, Gabrielle and Parton, Nigel (2004) Modernising social work and the ethics of care. Social Work & Society 2(1), 10–27.Google Scholar
Mehta, Balwant Singh (2016) A decent work framework: Women in the ICT sector in India. Information Development 32(5), 1718–1729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellström, Ulf (2009) The intersection of gender, race and cultural boundaries, or why is computer science in Malaysia dominated by women? Social Studies of Science 39(6), 885–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menendez-Blanco, Maria, Bjørn, Pernille, Møller, Naja M. Holten, Bruun, Jens, Dybkjær, Hans, and Lorentzen, Kasper (2018) GRACE: Broadening narratives of computing through history, craft and technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work GROUP ‘18, January 7–10, 2018, Sanibel Island, FL, USA. New York: ACM Press, 397–400.Google Scholar
Menzies, Heather (1981) Women and the chip: Case studies of the effects of informatics on employment in Canada. Montréal: The Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP).Google Scholar
Messing, Karen (1992) Introduction. Research Directed to Improving Women’s Occupational Health 18(3), 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Messing, Karen (2014) Pain and prejudice: What science can learn about work from the people who do it. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Messing, Karen, Chatigny, Céline, and Courville, Julie (1998) ‘Light’ and ‘heavy’ work in the housekeeping service of a hospital. Applied Ergonomics 29(6), 451–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messing, Karen, Lefrançois, Mélanie, and Saint-Charles, Johanne (2021) Observing inequality: Can ergonomic observations help interventions transform the role of gender in work activity? Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 215–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messing, Karen, Seifert, Ana Maria, Vézina, Nicole, Balka, Ellen, and Chatigny, Céline (2005) Qualitative research using numbers: An approach developed in France and used to transform work in North America. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 15(3), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messing, Karen and Stevenson, Joan (1996) Women in procrustean beds: Strength testing and the workplace. Gender, Work, and Organization 3(3), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, Milagros and Posada, Julian (2022) The data-production dispositif. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction. New York: ACM Press, Article 460.Google Scholar
Miceli, Milagros, Yang, Tianling, Garcia, Adriana Alvarado, Posada, Julian, Wang, Sonj Mei, Pohl, Marc, and Hanna, Alex (2022) Documenting data production processes: A participatory approach for data work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human–Computer Interaction CHI 2022 6 (CSCW2). New York: ACM Press, Article 510.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria (1986) Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Milan, Stefania and Treré, Emiliano (2021) Big data from the south(s): An analytical matrix to investigate data at the margins. In Rohlinger, D. and Sobieraj, S. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociology and digital media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkman, Ruth (1983) Female factory labor and industrial structure: Control and conflict over ‘woman’s place’ in auto and electrical manufacturing. Politics & Society 12(2), 159–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Ryan A., Vaccaro, Annemarie, Kimball, Ezekiel W., and Forester, Rachael (2021) ‘It’s dude culture’: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 14(3), 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miltner, Kate M. (2019) Girls who coded: Gender in twentieth century UK and US computing. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44(1), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misa, Thomas J. (2021) Dynamics of gender bias in computing. Communications of the ACM 64(6), 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra (1988) Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review 30(1), 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra (2003) ‘Under Western eyes’ revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(2), 499–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohla, Satyam, Bagh, Bishnupriya, and Guha, Anupam (2021) A material lens to investigate the gendered impact of the AI industry. In IJCAI 2021 Workshop on AI for Social Good. August 19–26, 2021. Virtual event.Google Scholar
Möhlmann, Marieke and Zalmanson, Lior (2017) Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers’ autonomy. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), December 10–13, Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie, Moser, Ingunn, and Pols, Jeannette (2010) Care: Putting practice into theory. In Mol, A., Moser, I., and Pols, J. (eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Naja L. Holten (2018) The future of clerical work is precarious. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 25(4), 75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Naja L. Holten, Bossen, Claus, Pine, Kathleen H., Nielsen, Trine Rask, and Neff, Gina (2020) Who does the work of data? Interactions 27(3), 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Shelagh (2016) ‘Nimble’ intersectionality in employment research: A way to resolve methodological dilemmas. Work, Employment and Society 30(4), 708–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgall, Janine (1981) Typing our way to freedom: Is it true that new office technology can liberate women? Feminist Review 9(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, Chantal and McDonnell, Martina (2015) The gendering of the computing field in Finland, France and the United Kingdom between 1960 and 1990. In Schafer, V. and Thierry, B.G. (eds.), Connecting women: Women, gender and ICT in Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth century. Cham: Springer International, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Michael J. (1999) Invisible work of telephone operators: An ethnocritical analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 8(1), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Kathleen, Strand, Lola, Theron, Linda, and Ungar, Michael (2021) ‘I just gotta have tough skin’: Women’s experiences working in the oil and gas industry in Canada. The Extractive Industries and Society 8(2), 100882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Michelle (2015) Unsettling care: Troubling transnational itineraries of care in feminist health practices. Social Studies of Science 45(5), 717–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutlu, Bilge and Forlizzi, Jodi (2008) Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human–robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, March 12–15, 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. New York: ACM Press, 287–294.Google Scholar
Nafus, Dawn (2012) ‘Patches don’t have gender’: What is not open in open source software. New Media & Society 14(4), 669–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, Indira and Bulleit, William M. (2020) Pragmatism and care in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 26(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nardi, Bonnie and Engeström, Yrjö (1999) A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer (1987) Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1, 7–36.Google Scholar
Ngai, Pun (2005) Made in China: Women factory workers in a global workplace. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis and Ganter, Sarah Anne (2022) The power of platforms: Shaping media and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nies, Sarah and Sauer, Dieter (2010) Was wird aus der Betriebsfallstudie? Forschungsstrategische Herausforderungen durch Entgrenzung von Arbeit und Betrieb. AIS-Studien 3(1), 14–23.Google Scholar
Nilsson, Åsa Wikberg and Jahnke, Marcus (2018) Tactics for norm-creative innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 4(4), 375–391.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. (1978) Social choice in machine design: The case of automatically controlled machine tools. Politics & Society 8(3–4), 313–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Safiya Umoja (2018) Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norlock, Kathryn (2019) Feminist ethics. In Zalta, E.N. et al. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (1999) Women and equality: The capabilities approach. International Labour Review 138(3), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha (2003) Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9(2–3), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygaard, Kirsten and Bergo, O. Terje (1975) The Trade Unions: New Users of Research. Personnel review, 4(2), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Mary (1981) The politics of reproduction. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
O’Farrell, Rory, and Montagnier, Pierre (2019) Measuring platform mediated workers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Oesterreich, Rainer and Volpert, Walter (1986) Task analysis for work design on the basis of action regulation theory. Economic and Industrial Democracy 7(4), 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Ihudiya Finda, Smith, Angela, D.R., To, Alexandra, and Toyama, Kentaro (2020) Critical race theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. New York: ACM Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Oldenziel, Ruth (1999) Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Margrethe H. and Lucas, Henry C. Jr. (1982) The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implications for research and practice. Communications of the ACM 25(11), 838–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onafuwa, Dimeji (2018) Allies and decoloniality: A review of the intersectional perspectives on design, politics, and power symposium. Design and Culture 10(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Aihwa (1987) Disassembling gender in the electronics age. Feminist Studies 13(3), 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orupabo, Julia (2022) Enacting efficient care within a context of rationalisation. The Sociological Review 70(1), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyěwùmí, Oyèrónkẹ́ (1997) The invention of women: Making an African sense of Western gender discourses. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pacaud, Suzanne (1949) Recherches sur le travail des téléphonistes. Étude psychologique d’un métier. Le Travail humain 12, 46–65.Google Scholar
Paganini, Lavinia and Gama, Kiev (2021) A preliminary study about the low engagement of female participation in hackathons. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops ICSEW, 27 June–19 July 2020, Seoul, Republic of Korea. New York: ACM Press, 193–194.Google Scholar
Pal, Joyojeet (2010) Of mouse and men: Computers and geeks as cinematic icons in the age of ICTD. In Proceedings of the iConference, February 3–6, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA. 179–187.Google Scholar
Pantazidou, Marina and Nair, Indira (1999) Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education 88(2), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panteli, Niki, Stack, Janet, and Ramsey, Harvie (2001) Gendered patterns in computing work in the late 1990s. New Technology, Work and Employment 16(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panteli, Niki and Urquhart, Cathy (2022) Job crafting for female contractors in a male‐dominated profession. New Technology, Work and Employment 37(1), 102–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parolini, Giuditta (2015) From computing girls to data processors: Women assistants in the Rothamsted Statistics Department. In Schafer, V. and Thierry, B.G. (eds.), Connecting women. Cham: Springer, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsley, Samantha (2022) Feeling your way as an occupational minority: The gendered sensilisation of women electronic music artists. Management Learning 53(4), 697–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternò, Fabio and Wulf, Volker (eds.) (2017) New perspectives in end-user development. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulson, Timothy Amund (2017) From ‘knife men’ to ‘streamlining with curves’: Structure, skill, and gender in British Columbia’s meat-packing industry. BC Studies: The British Columbian Quarterly 193, 115–145.Google Scholar
Peter, Elizabeth and Morgan, Kathryn Pauly (2001) Explorations of a trust approach for nursing ethics. Nursing Inquiry 8(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, Anne (2001) Feminism and liberalism revisited: Has Martha Nussbaum got it right? Constellations 8(2), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierri, Paola (2016) Why people do not rebel. Issues of self-marginalization in design for mental health. In Intersectional Perspectives on Design, Politics and Power, Nov 14–15, 2016, School of Arts and Communication, Malmö University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Pine, Kathleen H. and Mazmanian, Melissa (2014) Institutional logics of the EMR and the problem of’perfect but inaccurate accounts. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, February 15–19, 2014, Baltimore, MD, USA. New York: ACM Press, 283–294.Google Scholar
Pipek, Volkmar (2005) From tailoring to appropriation support: Negotiating groupware usage. PhD thesis, Faculty of Science, Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Pipek, Volkmar and Wulf, Volker (2009) Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(5), 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, Zadie (1997) Zeros + ones: Digital women + the new technoculture. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Plantin, Jean-Christophe (2021) The data archive as factory: Alienation and resistance of data processors. Big Data & Society 8(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pook, Zooey Sophia (2020) The challenge of implementing preferred gender pronouns: Queer autonomy in the age of information technologies. InterAlia: A Journal of Queer Studies 15, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posada, Julian (2022) Embedded reproduction in platform data work. Information, Communication & Society 25(6), 816–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pot, Mirjam, Spahl, Wanda, and Prainsack, Barbara (2019) The gender of biomedical data: Challenges for personalised and precision medicine. Somatechnics 9(2–3), 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probyn, Elspeth (1990) Travels in the postmodern: Making sense of the local. In Nicolson, L. (ed.), Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 176–189.Google Scholar
Prosperi, Mattia, Min, Jae S., Bian, Jiang, and Modave, François (2018) Big data hurdles in precision medicine and precision public health. BMC medical Informatics and Decision Making 18, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prügl, Elisabeth (1996) Home-based workers: A comparative exploration of Mies’s theory of housewifization. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 17(1), 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science 41(1), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullen, Alison, Thanem, Torkild, Tyler, Melissa, and Wallenberg, Louise (2016) Sexual politics, organizational practices: Interrogating queer theory, work and organization. Gender, Work, and Organization 23(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullman, Cydney and Szymanski, Sharon (1986) The impact of office technology on clerical worker skills in the banking, insurance and legal industries in New York City: Implications for training: A study for the Private Industry Council of New York City. New York: The Labor Institute.Google Scholar
Qi, Jie, Buechley, Leah, Huang, Andrew ‘bunnie’, Ng, Patricia, Cross, Sean, and Paradiso, Joseph A. (2018) Chibitronics in the wild: Engaging new communities in creating technology with paper electronics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2018, April 21–26, 2018, Montréal, QC, Canada. New York: ACM Press, Article 252.Google Scholar
Raghuram, Parvati, Herman, Clem, Ruiz Ben, Esther, and Sondhi, Gunjan (2017) Women and IT scorecard – India, a survey of 55 firms. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
Raji, Inioluwa Deborah (2020) Handle with care: Lessons for data science from Black female scholars. Patterns 1(8), 100150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, Dave (2022) Made to work: Mobilising contemporary worklives (book review). Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 31, 555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, David, Rouncefield, Mark, and Tolmie, Peter (2021) Ethnography, CSCW and ethnomethodology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, Yolanda A. and Thomas, Jakita O. (2020) The intersectional experiences of Black women in computing. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education SIGCSE’20, 11–14 March 2020, Portland, OR, USA. New York: ACM Press, 199–205.Google Scholar
Rantalaiho, Liisa (1990) Office work as women’s work. The Polish Sociological Bulletin 90, 63–74.Google Scholar
Rantalaiho, Liisa and Korvajärvi, Päivi (1985) Women’s office work and coping with technological change. Tampere: Department of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Raub, McKenzie (2018) Bots, bias and big data: Artificial intelligence, algorithmic bias and disparate impact liability in hiring practices. Arkansas Law Review 71(2), 529–570.Google Scholar
Raval, Noopur and Dourish, Paul (2016) Standing out from the crowd: Emotional labor, body labor, and temporal labor in ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing CSCW ‘16, February 27–March 2, 2016, San Francisco, California, USA. New York: ACM Press, 97–107.Google Scholar
Reason, Peter and Bradbury, Hilary (eds.) (2001) Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth (2001) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ren, Xinyue (2022) Adopting feminist pedagogy in computer science education to empower underrepresented populations: A critical review. TechTrends 66(3), 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rentschler, Carrie (2019) Making culture and doing feminism. In Oren, T. and Press, A. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary feminism. London and New York: Routledge, 27–147.Google Scholar
Rey-Moreno, Carlos, Roro, Zukile, Tucker, William D., Siya, Masbulele Jay, Bidwell, Nicola J., and Simo-Reigadas, Javier (2013) Experiences, challenges and lessons from rolling out a rural WiFi mesh network. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Computing for Development ACM DEV ‘13, Bangalore, India – January 11–12, 2013. New York: ACM Press, Article 11.Google Scholar
Reynolds-Cuéllar, Pedro, Serpa, Bibiana Oliveira, Grisales, Claudia, Goñi, Julián ‘Iñaki’, Wong-Villacres, Marisol, and Lemus, Oscar A. (2022) Reviews gone south: A subversive experiment on participatory design canons: Dedicated to the memory of Oscar A. Lemus. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference PDC 2022 August 19–September 1, 2022, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. New York: ACM Press, 206–217.Google Scholar
Richardson, Lizzie (2018) Feminist geographies of digital work. Progress in Human Geography 42(2), 244–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riecken, Ted, Strong-Wilson, Teresa, Conibear, Frank, Michel, Corrine, and Riecken, Janet (2005) Connecting, speaking, listening: Toward an ethics of voice with/in participatory action research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(1).Google Scholar
Riley, Donna (2013) Hidden in plain view: Feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(1), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, Donna, Pawley, Alice L., Tucker, Jessica, and Catalano, George D. (2009) Feminisms in engineering education: Transformative possibilities. NWSA Journal 21(2), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Loaiza, Cuauhtemoc and Wong-Villacres, Marisol (2022) Global Plaza: Creating an inclusive and equitable space at high-level conferences. In 9th Mexican International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (MexIHC’22), November 16–18, 2022, Virtual Event, Mexico. ACM, New York, NY, USA. New York: ACM Press, Article 6.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Naba, Casanova-Perez, Reggie, Ramaswamy, Harshini, Dirks, Lisa G., Bascom, Emily, and Weibel, Nadir (2022 ) QTBIPOC PD: Exploring the intersections of race, gender, and sexual orientation. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’22, April 30–May 06, 2022, New Orleans, LA. New York: ACM Press, Article 120.Google Scholar
Roan, Amanda and Whitehouse, Gillian (2007) Women, information technology and ‘waves of optimism’: Australian evidence on ‘mixed‐skill’ jobs. New Technology, Work and Employment 22(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Toni (2000) Co-operative work, women and the working environments of technology design. Australian Feminist Studies 15(32), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Toni and Wagner, Ina (2012) Ethics: Engagement, representation and politics-in-action. In Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. (eds.), Routledge international handbook of participatory design. London and New York: Routledge, 64–85.Google Scholar
Roby, Pamela (1992) Women and the ASA: Degendering organizational structures and processes, 1964–1974. The American Sociologist 23(1), 18–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rode, Jennifer A., Weibert, Anne, Marshall, Andrea, Aal, Konstantin, Von Rekowski, Thomas, Elmimouni, Houda, and Booker, Jennifer (2015) From computational thinking to computational making. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing UbiComp ‘15, September 7–11, 2015, Osaka, Japan. New York: ACM Press, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, Clemencia (2017) Studying media at the margins: Learning from the field. In Pickard, V. and Yang, G. (eds.), Media activism in the digital age. London and New York: Routledge, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, Jenny K., Holvino, Evangelina, Fletcher, Joyce K., and Nkomo, Stella M. (2016) The theory and praxis of intersectionality in work and organisations: Where do we go from here? Gender, Work and Organization 23(3), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Gillian (1993) Feminism & geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Joan (ed.) (1983) Machina ex Dea: Feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Roussel, Natacha and Stolfi, Ariane (2020) Taking back the future: A short history of singular technologies in Brazil. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6(2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Ben, Esther (2007) Defining expertise in software development while doing gender. Gender, Work & Organization 14(4), 312–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rycroft‐Malone, Jo, Fontenla, Marina, Seers, Kate, and Bick, Debra (2009) Protocol‐based care: The standardisation of decision‐making? Journal of Clinical Nursing 18(10), 1490–1500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saifuddin, Samina, Dyke, Lorraine, and Hossain, Md Sajjad (2022) Doing and undoing gender: Women professionals’ persistence in technology occupations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 41(4), 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehi, Nihoumar, Irani, Lily C., Bernstein, Michael S., Alkhatib, Ali, Ogbe, Eva, and Milland, Kristy (2015) We are dynamo: Overcoming stalling and friction in collective action for crowd workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2015, April 18 – 23, 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea. New York: ACM Press, 1621–1630.Google Scholar
Salembier, Pascal and Wagner, Ina (2021) Studies of work ‘in the wild’: The field study tradition in work practice research. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 30, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salminen‐Karlsson, Minna and Golay, Diane (2022) Information systems in nurses’ work: Technical rationality versus an ethic of care. New Technology, Work and Employment 37(2), 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saloma-Akpdeonu, Czarina, Ng, Cecilia, and Mitter, Swasti (2005) Female spaces in the Philippines’ ICT industry. In Ng, C. and Mitter, S. (eds.), Gender and the digital economy: Perspectives from the developing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 61–84.Google Scholar
Salzinger, Leslie (2001) Making fantasies real. Producing women and men on the maquila shop floor. NACLA Report on the Americas 34(5), 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samulowitz, Anke, Gremyr, Ida, Eriksson, Erik, and Hensing, Gunnel (2018) ‘Brave men’ and ‘emotional women’: A theory-guided literature review on gender bias in health care and gendered norms towards patients with chronic pain. Pain Research and Management. Article 6358624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6358624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, Åke (ed.) (1995) Enriching production: Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla plant as an alternative to lean production. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Work Life Research.Google Scholar
Sandelowski, Margarete (1997) Exploring the gender–technology relation in nursing. Nursing Inquiry 4(4), 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangster, Joan (1994) Telling our stories: Feminist debates and the use of oral history. Women’s History Review 3(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoni de Sio, Filippo and van Wynsberghe, Aimee (2016) When should we use care robots? The nature-of-activities approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 22, 1745–1760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sappleton, Natalie and Takruri-Rizk, Haifa (2008) The gender subtext of science, engineering, and technology (SET) organizations: A review and critique. Women’s Studies 37(3), 284–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sreela (2016) Beyond the ‘digital divide’: The ‘computer girls’ of Seelampur. Feminist Media Studies 16(6), 968–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scacchi, Anna (2016) Nodi e questioni intorno al ‘parlare di razza’. The European South 1, 63–73.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon (1996) Babbage’s dancer and the impresarios of mechanism. In Spufford, F. and Uglow, J. (eds.), Cultural babbage: Technology, time and invention. London: Faber & Faber, 53–80.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, Morgan Klaus, Branham, Stacy M., and Hamidi, Foad (2018) Safe spaces and safe places: Unpacking technology-mediated experiences of safety and harm with transgender people. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 2(CSCW), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa (2012) Gendered innovations in biomedicine and public health research. In Oertelt-Prigione, S. and Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (eds.), Sex and gender aspects in clinical medicine. London: Springer, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schild, Verónica (2000) ‘Gender equity’ without social justice. Women’s rights in the neoliberal age. NACLA Report on the Americas 34(1), 25–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinzel, Britta (2004) Epistemische Veränderungen an der Schnittstelle Informatik und Naturwissenschaften. In Schmitz, S. and Schinzel, B. (eds.), Grenzgänge. Genderforschung in Informatik und Naturwissenschaften. Sulzbach: Ulrike Helmer Verlag, 30–49.Google Scholar
Schinzel, Britta (2017) Women in computing and the contingency of informatics cultures. In Werthner, H. and Harmelen, F.v. (eds.) Informatics in the Future: Proceedings of the 11th European Computer Science Summit (ECSS 2015), Vienna, October 2015. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Ari, Edwards, W. Keith, and Grinter, Rebecca E. (2017) Intersectional HCI: Engaging identity through gender, race, and class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2017, May 6–11, 2017, Denver, CO, USA. New York: ACM Press, 5412–5427.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Kjeld (2000) The critical role of workplace studies. In Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing systems design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Kjeld (2011) Cooperative work and coordinative practices. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Kjeld (2018) Practice and technology: On the conceptual foundations of practice-centered computing. In Wulf, V., Pipek, V., Randall, D., Rohde, M., Schmidt, K., and Stevens, G. (eds.), Socio-informatics: A practice-based perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 47–104.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Kjeld and Bannon, Liam (2013) Constructing CSCW: The first quarter century. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22(4), 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, Donald A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schorch, Marén, Wan, Lin, Randall, Dave, and Wulf, Volker (2016) Designing for those who are overlooked: Insider perspectives on care practices and cooperative work of elderly informal caregivers. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing CSCW’16, February 27–March 2, 2016, San Francisco, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 787–799.Google Scholar
Schultz, T., Abdulla, D., Ansari, A., Canlı, E., Keshavarz, M., Kiem, M., and JS Vieira de Oliveira, P. (2018) What is at stake with decolonizing design? A roundtable. Design and Culture 10(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuurman, Nadine and Balka, Ellen (2009) alt.metadata.health: Ontological context for data use and integration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18, 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwennesen, Nete (2019) Algorithmic assemblages of care: Imaginaries, epistemologies and repair work. Sociology of Health & Illness 41(S1), 176–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, Joan W. and Tilly, Louise A. (1975) Women’s work and the family in nineteenth-century Europe. Comparative Studies in Society and History 17(1), 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Lynne (2017) Gender, power and Feminist resistance. In Bolsø, A., Svendsen, B.S.H., and Sørensen, Ø.S. (eds.), Bodies, symbols and organizational practice: The gendered dynamics of power. London: Routledge, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya (1993) Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A. (eds.), The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendak, Mark, Elish, Madeleine Clare, Gao, Michael, Futoma, Joseph, et al. (2020) ‘The human body is a black box’: Supporting clinical decision-making with deep learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency FAT* ‘20, January 27–30, 2020, Barcelona, Spain. New York: ACM Press, 99–109.Google Scholar
Shadowen, Ashley Nicole (2017) Ethics and bias in machine learning: A technical study of what makes us ‘good’. New York: Academic Works, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Sharkey, Noel and Sharkey, Amanda (2012) The eldercare factory. Gerontology 58(3), 282–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shestakofsky, Benjamin (2017) Working algorithms: Software automation and the future of work. Work and Occupations 44(4), 376–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetterly, Margot Lee (2016) Hidden figures: The American dream and the untold story of the Black women mathematicians who helped win the space race. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Shields, Stephanie A. (2002) Speaking from the heart: Gender and the social meaning of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstone, Roger and Haddon, Leslie (1996) Design and the domestication of ICTs: Technical change and everyday life. In Silverstone, R. (ed.), Communicating by design: The politics of information and communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstone, Rosalie and Towler, Rosemary (1984) Secretaries at work. Ergonomics 27(5), 557–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simone, Carla (2018) Everything is permitted unless stated otherwise: Models and representations in socio-technical (re) design. In Rossignoli, C., Virili, F., and Za, S. (eds.), Digital technology and organizational change: Reshaping technology, people, and organizations towards a global society. Cham: Springer, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simone, Carla, Wagner, Ina, Müller, Claudia, Weibert, Anne, and Wulf, Volker (2022) Future-proofing: Making practice-based IT design sustainable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, Jesper and Robertson, Toni (eds.) (2012) Routledge international handbook of participatory design. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinders, Caroline (2020) Feminist data set. Clinic for Open Source Arts. Available at https://carolinesinders.Google Scholar
Small, Stephen A. and Uttal, Lynet (2005) Action-oriented research: Strategies for engaged scholarship. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4), 936–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, Dorothé and Fuchsberger, Verena (2020) Sprinkling diversity: Hurdles on the way to inclusiveness in makerspaces. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society NordiCHI’20, October 25–29, 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. New York: ACM Press, Article 96.Google Scholar
Smith, Anita (2013) Using a theory to understand triage decision making. International Emergency Nursing 21(2), 113–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Dorothy E. (1987) The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (1990) The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smolevitskaya, Marina (2021) Women in computer world of the USSR and Russia. In Proceedings of International Conference Engineering Technologies and Computer Science EnT, 18–19 August 2021, Moscow, Russian Federation, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Thomas and Dimond, Jill (2014) Anti-oppressive design. Interactions 21(6), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, Margaret (2005) ‘Working’ culture: Exploring notions of workplace culture and learning at work. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 13(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, Kate (1993) Productive contradictions. In Ramazanoglu, C. (ed.), Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism. London and New York: Routledge, 29–50.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Björg Aase (1982) Ansvarsrasjonalitet [Responsible rationality]. In Holter, H. (ed.), Kvinner i fellesskap [Women in collectives]. Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Knut H. (1992) Towards a feminized technology? Gendered values in the construction of technology. Social Studies of Science 22(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Robert (2015) Robots in aged care: A dystopian future? AI & Society 31(4), 445–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrow, Robert and Sparrow, Linda (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines 16(2), 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, S. Leigh and Strauss, Anselm (1999) Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8(1/2), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefancic, Jean and Delgado, Richard (2023) Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Gunnar, Rohde, Markus, Korn, Matthias, and Wulf, Volker (2018) Grounded design: A research paradigm in practice-based computing. In Wulf, V., Pipek, V., Randall, D., Rohde, M., Schmidt, K., and Stevens, G. (eds.), Socio informatics – A practice-based perspective on the design and use of IT artefacts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23–46.Google Scholar
Stiemerling, Oliver, Kahler, Helge, and Wulf, Volker (1997) How to make software softer – Designing tailorable applications. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, Aug 18–20, 1997, Amsterdam, NL. New York: ACM Press, 365–376.Google Scholar
Stoljar, Natalie (2022) Feminist perspectives on autonomy. In Zalta, E.N. and Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/feminism-autonomy/.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm (1982) Interorganizational negotiation. Urban Life 11(3), 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm (1988) The articulation of project work: An organizational process. Sociological Quarterly 29(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm, Fagerhaugh, Shizuko, Suczek, Barabara, and Wiener, Carolyn (1985) Social Organization of Medical Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, A.L., Fagerhaugh, S., Suczek, B., and Wiener, C. (1982) The work of hospitalized patients. Social Science & Medicine 16(9), 977–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strohmayer, Angelika (2021) Digitally augmenting traditional craft practices for social justice: The partnership quilt. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohmayer, Angelika, Laing, Mary, and Comber, Rob (2017) Technologies and social justice outcomes in sex work charities: Fighting stigma, saving lives. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2017, May 6–11, 2017, Denver, CO, USA. New York: ACM Press, 3352–3364.Google Scholar
Strohmayer, Angelika, Meissner, Janis Lena, Wilson, Alexander, Charlton, Sarah, and McIntyre, Laura (2020) ‘We come together as one … and hope for solidarity to live on’. On designing technologies for activism and the commemoration of lost lives. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference DIS’20, July 6–10, 2020, Eindhoven, Netherlands. New York: ACM Press, 87–100.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Simone, Peters, Anicia, Bardzell, Shaowen, Burnett, Margaret, Busse, Daniela, Cauchard, Jessica, and Churchill, Elizabeth (2020) Gender-inclusive HCI research and design: A conceptual review. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction 13(1), 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Styhre, Alexander, Backman, Maria, and Börjesson, Sofia (2005) YCC: A gendered carnival? Project work at Volvo cars. Women in Management Review 20(2), 96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, Marcela (2016) Colectivos sociales y ciborgs: hacia una lectura feminista de los drones. Teknokultura 13(1), 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (1994) Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (1995) Making work visible. Communications of the ACM 38(9), 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (2000) Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(1–2), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (2002) Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(2), 91–105.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (2007) Feminist STS and the sciences of the artificial. In Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., and Wajcman, J. (eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 139–163.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (2007) Human–machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy (2019) Agencies in technology design: Feminist reconfigurations. In Wallach, W. and Asaro, P. (eds.), Machine ethics and robot ethics. London: Routledge, 361–375.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy and Jordan, Brigitte (1988) Computerization and women’s knowledge. In Tijdens, K., Jennings, M., Wagner, I., and Weggelaar, M. (eds.), Proceedings of IFIP WG 9.1. Conference on Women. Work and Computerization: Forming New Alliances. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Suchman, Lucy and Wynn, Eleanor (1984) Procedures and problems in the office. Office Technology and People 2(2), 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sued, Gabriela Elisa (2018) The cyborg metaphor in Ibero-American science, technology and gender literature. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1(1), 95–108.Google Scholar
Tassabehji, Rana, Harding, Nancy, Lee, Hugh, and Dominguez-Pery, Carine (2021) From female computers to male comput♂rs: Or why there are so few women writing algorithms and developing software. Human Relations 74(8), 1296–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teiger, Catherine (2006) ‘Les femmes aussi ont un cerveau!’ Le travail des femmes en ergonomie: réflexions sur quelques paradoxes. Travailler 1(15), 71–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrin, Jean-Jacques and Wagner, Ina (2023) L’urbanism informel. Au-delà du droit à la ville. Paris: Presses des Ponts.Google Scholar
Theureau, Jacques, Wisner, Alain, Estryn-Béhar, Madeleine, and Vaichère, A. (1979) L’analyse des activités des infirmiers (es) des unités de soins hospitalières. Paris: Laboratoire de physiologie du travail et d’ergonomie du CNAM.Google Scholar
Thil, Laurène et al. (2022) Artificial intelligence, platform work and gender equality. Luxembourg: European Institute for Gender Equality, EIGE.Google Scholar
Thompson, Lucy, Rickett, Bridgette, and Day, Katy (2018) Feminist relational discourse analysis: Putting the personal in the political in feminist research. Qualitative Research in Psychology 15(1), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietze, Mari and McBride, Susan (2020) Robotics and the impact on nursing practice: Case study and pilot site analyses. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.Google Scholar
Tinsman, Heidi (2004) More than victims: Women agricultural workers and social change in rural Chile. In Winn, P. (ed.), Victims of the Chilean miracle: Workers and neoliberalism in the Pinochet era, 1973–2002. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 261–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toombs, Austin, Gross, Shad, Bardzell, Shaowen, and Bardzell, Jeffrey (2017) From empathy to care: A feminist care ethics perspective on long-term researcher–participant relations. Interacting with Computers 29(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornbjerg, Kristina, Kanstrup, Anne Marie, Skov, Mikael B., and Rehm, Matthias (2021) Investigating human–robot cooperation in a hospital environment: Scrutinising visions and actual realisation of mobile robots in service work. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, June 28–July 2, 2021, Virtual Event. New York: ACM Press, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toxtli, Carlos, Suri, Siddharth, and Savage, Saiph (2021) Quantifying the invisible labor in crowd work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. 5 (CSCW2), Article 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trauth, Eileen M. (2002) Odd girl out: An individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession. Information Technology & People 15(2), 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigg, Randall H. and Bødker, Susanne (1994) From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 22–26 October 1994, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. New York: ACM Press, 45–54.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. (1987) Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(4), 644–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. (1993) Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. (2013) Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Truss, Catherine, Alfes, Kerstin, Shantz, Amanda, and Rosewarne, Amanda (2013) Still in the ghetto? Experiences of secretarial work in the 21st century. Gender, Work & Organization 20(4), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tubaro, Paola and Casilli, Antonio A. (2020) Portraits of micro-workers: The real people behind AI in France. In 2nd Crowdworking Symposium Research program ‘Digital Future’, Universities of Paderborn and Bielefeld, Oct 2020, Paderborn, Germany. Hal-02960775.Google Scholar
Tubaro, Paola, Le Ludec, Clément, and Casilli, Antonio A. (2020) Counting ‘micro-workers’: Societal and methodological challenges around new forms of labour. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 14(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, Elizabeth Dori (2023) Decolonizing design: A cultural justice guidebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, Sherry and Papert, Seymour (1990) Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16(1), 128–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Michelle, Holdsworth, Sarah, Scott-Young, Christina M., and Sandri, Kara (2021) Resilience in a hostile workplace: The experience of women onsite in construction. Construction Management and Economics 39(10), 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twagira, Laura Ann (2020) Machines that cook or women who cook? Lessons from Mali on technology, labor, and women’s things. Technology and Culture 61(2), S77–S103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utzeri, Mounia (2019) The dark side of gender equality schemes in management – A deep dive into a German auto manufacturer. Vezetéstudomány – Budapest Management Review 50(5), 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Ende, Jan and van Oost, Ellen CJ (2001) Making women count: Gender-typing, technology and path dependencies in Dutch statistical data processing, 1900–1970. European Journal of Women’s Studies 8(4), 491–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Velden, Maja (2019) Women’s health, decent work and the electronics industry. In Blogging for Sustainability. Sustainable Market Actors for Responsible Trade (March 8, SMART).Google Scholar
Van der Velden, Maja and Mörtberg, Christina (2012) Between need and desire: Exploring strategies for gendering design. Science, Technology, & Human Values 37(6), 663–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Doorn, Niels (2017) Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’ economy. Information, Communication & Society 20(6), 898–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Doorn, Niels and Badger, Adam (2020) Platform capitalism’s hidden abode: Producing data assets in the gig economy. Antipode 52(5), 1475–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wynsberghe, Aimee (2013) Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(2), 407–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wynsberghe, Aimee (2022) Social robots and the risks to reciprocity. AI & Society 37(2), 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varanasi, Rama Adithya, Siddarth, Divya, Seshadri, Vivek, Bali, Kalika, and Vashistha, Aditya (2022) Feeling proud, feeling embarrassed: Experiences of low-income women with crowd work. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’22, April 29–May 5, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA. New York: ACM Press, Article 298.Google Scholar
Ve, Hildur (1998) Rationality and identity in Norwegian feminism. In von der Fehr, D., Jonasdottir, A., and Rosenbeck, B. (eds.), Is there a Nordic feminism? Nordic feminist thought on culture and society. London: Routledge, 343–361.Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, Marja (1999) Gender and computing in retrospect: The case of Finland. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 21(2), 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, Marja (1991) Gender in information system development – A women office workers’ standpoint. In Eriksson, I., Kitchenham, B., and Tijdens, K. (eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP TC9/WG9.1 Conference Women, Work and Computerization: Understanding and Overcoming Bias in Work and Education. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 247–262.Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, Marja and Brunila, Kristiina (2007) Cartography of gender equality projects in ICT: Liberal equality from the perspective of situated equality. Information, Community and Society 10(3), 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, Peter-Paul (2006) Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31(3), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitores, Anna and Gil-Juárez, Adriana (2016) The trouble with ‘women in computing’: A critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. Journal of Gender Studies 25(6), 666–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpert, Walter (1985) Psychologische Aspekte industrieller Arbeit. In Georg, W., Kißler, L. and Sattel, U. (eds.), Arbeit und Wissenschaft: Arbeitswissenschaft?. Bonn: Verlag Neue Gesellschaft, 9–36.Google Scholar
Volst, Angelika and Wagner, Ina (1988) Inequality in the automated office: The impact of computers on the division of labour. International Sociology 3(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waerness, Kari (1996) The rationality of caring. In Noddings, N., Benner, P.E., and Gordon, S. (eds.), Caregiving: Readings in knowledge, practice, ethics, and politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 231–255.Google Scholar
Wagner, Ina (1986) Equal talents – Unequal measures. Skilled women workers in Austria’s metal industry. European Journal for Engieering Education 11(3), 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Ina (1987) The office between humanization and control. In Doherty, P., Fuchs-Kittowski, K., and Kolm, P. (eds.) The IFIP TC 9/WG 9.1 Working Conference on System Design for Human Development and Productivity: Participation and Beyond, January 1987, Berlin, Germany. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 141–154.Google Scholar
Wagner, Ina (1993) Women’s voice: The case of nursing information systems. AI & Society 7(4), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Ina (1994) Connecting communities of practice: Feminism, science, and technology. Women’s Studies International Forum 17(2–3), 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Ina (1995) Hard times: The politics of women’s work in computerized environments. The European Journal of Women’s Studies 2, 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Ina, Birbaumer, Andrea, and Tolar, Marianne (2003) Widening women’s work in information and communication technology. Professional Trajectories and Biographies. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Wajcman, Judy (1991) Patriarchy, technology, and conceptions of skill. Work and Occupations 18(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajcman, Judy (2006 ) Technocapitalism meets technofeminism: Women and technology in a wireless world. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work 16(3), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajcman, Judy (2007) From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Information, Community and Society 10(3), 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Maggie, Kukutai, Tahu, Russo Carroll, Stephanie, and Rodriguez-Lonebear, Desi (eds.) (2021) Indigenous data sovereignty and policy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wallace, Terry (1999) ‘It’s a man’s world!’ Restructuring gender imbalance in the Volvo truck company? Gender, Work & Organization 6(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Cynthia Changxin, Mussi, Eveline, and Sunindijo, Riza Yosia (2021) Analysing gender issues in the Australian construction industry through the lens of empowerment. Buildings 11(11), 23p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warouw, Nicolaas (2008) Industrial workers in transition: Women’s experiences of factory work in Tangerang. In Ford, M. and Parker, L. (eds.), Women and work in Indonesia. New York: Routledge, 104–119.Google Scholar
Washington, Nicki, Payton, Fay Cobb, McAlear, Frieda, Chapman, Gail, and Diaz, Lien (2012) Panel: Dismantling the master’s house: effective allyship, advocacy, and activism for women in computing. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education SIGCSE ‘21, March 13–20, 2021, Virtual Event, USA. New York: ACM Press, 604–605.Google Scholar
Waycott, Jenny, Davis, Hilary, Warr, Deborah, Edmonds, Fran, and Taylor, Gretel (2017) Co-constructing meaning and negotiating participation: Ethical tensions when ‘giving voice’ through digital storytelling. Interacting with Computers 29(2), 237–247.Google Scholar
Webb, Beatrice Potter (1902) The diary of an investigator. In Webb, S. and Webb, B.P. (eds.), Problems of modern industry. London, New York, and Bombay: Longmans, Greens, and Co., 1–19.Google Scholar
Weber, Jutta (2005) Helpless machines and true loving care givers: A feminist critique of recent trends in human–robot interaction. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 3(4), 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Jutta (2014) Opacity versus computational reflection: Modelling human–robot interaction in personal service robotics. Science, Technology & Innovation 10(1), 187–199.Google Scholar
Webster, Juliet (1986) The effects of word processing on secretarial and typing work: Changes in work processes and responses to change with special reference to dedicated word processing in selected offices in Bradford. PhD dissertation, University of Bradford.Google Scholar
Webster, Juliet (1993) Gender issues in the development of information technology in the office. In Green, E., Owen, J., and Pain, D. (eds.), Gendered design? Information technology and office systems. London: Taylor & Francis, 111–126.Google Scholar
Webster, Juliet (1996) Shaping women’s work: Gender, employment and information technology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weibert, Anne, Krüger, Max, Aal, Konstantin, Salehee, Setareh Sadat, Khatib, Renad, Randall, Dave, and Wulf, Volker (2019) Finding language classes: Designing a digital language Wizard with refugees and migrants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 3(CSCW), 111–116.Google Scholar
Weibert, Anne, Marshall, Andrea, Aal, Konstantin, Schubert, Kai, and Rode, Jennifer A. (2014) Sewing interest in e-textiles: Analyzing making from a gendered perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems DIS 2014, June 21–25, 2014, Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York: ACM Press, 15–24.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. and Roberts, Karlene H. (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 38, 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welfare, Katherine S., Hallowell, Matthew R., Shah, Julie A., and Riek, Laurel D. (2019) Consider the human work experience when integrating robotics in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction HRI, 11–14 March 2019, Daegu, South Korea. New York: ACM Press, 75–84.Google Scholar
West, Candace and Zimmerman, Don H. (1987) Doing gender. Gender & Society 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westwood, Sally (1984) All day, every day: Factory and family in the making of women’s lives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Wharton, Amy and Burris, Val (1983) Office automation and its impact on women workers. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations 10(2), 112–126.Google Scholar
Whiting, Rebecca and Symon, Gillian (2020) Digi-housekeeping: The invisible work of flexibility. Work, Employment and Society 34(6), 1079–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wichroski, Mary (1994) The secretary: Invisible labor in the workworld of women. Human Organization 53(1), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickson, Fern, Preston, Christopher, Binimelis, Rosa, Herrero, Amaranta, Hartley, Sarah, Wynberg, Rachel, and Wynne, Brian (2017) Addressing socio-economic and ethical considerations in biotechnology governance: The potential of a new politics of care. Food Ethics 1(2), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willcocks, Leslie (2020) Robo-apocalypse cancelled? Reframing the automation and future of work debate. Journal of Information Technology 35(4), 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Cara, McNaney, Roisin, Roper, Abi, et al. (2020 ) Rethinking notions of ‘giving voice’ in design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’20, April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. New York: ACM Press, 1–8.Google Scholar
Wing, Jeannette M. (2006) Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM 49(3), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, Jeannette M. (2008) Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366(1881), 3717–3725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winner, Langdon (1981) Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Winschiers-Theophilus, Heike, Zaman, Tariq, and Stanley, Colin (2019) A classification of cultural engagements in community technology design: Introducing a transcultural approach. AI & Society 34, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Peter and Carusi, Annamaria (2022) Professional expectations and patient expectations concerning the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the early diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH). Journal of Responsible Technology 12, 100052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wirtz, Veronika, Cribb, Alan, and Barber, Nick (2006) Patient–doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation – A critical analysis of models. Social Science & Medicine 62(1), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, Sarah, Duffield, Christine, Fry, Margaret, and Roche, Michael (2017) Workforce flexibility – In defence of professional healthcare work. Journal of Health Organization and Management 31(4), 503–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisner, Kirsten, Lyndon, Audrey, and Chesla, Catherine A. (2019) The electronic health record’s impact on nurses’ cognitive work: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 94, 74–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, Christine (2019) Conceptualizing care in the everyday work practices of machine learning developers. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference DIS’19 Companion, June 23–28, 2019, San Diego, CA, USA. New York: ACM Press, 331–335.Google Scholar
Wolf, Christine and Blomberg, Jeanette (2019a) Explainability in context: Lessons from an intelligent system in the IT services domain. In Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI 2019 Workshops, 20 March, 2019, Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar
Wolf, Christine and Blomberg, Jeanette (2019b) Evaluating the promise of human–algorithm collaborations in everyday work practices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 3(CSCW), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhall, Julia R. and Leach, Belinda (20109) Who will fight for us? Union designated women’s advocates in auto manufacturing workplaces. Just Labour: A Canadian Journal of Work and Society 16, 44–58.Google Scholar
World Bank (2020) Pivoting to inclusion: Leveraging lessons from the COVID-19 crisis for learners with disabilities. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Wulf, Volker, Müller, Claudia, Pipek, Volkmar, Randall, David, Rohde, Markus, and Stevens, Gunnar (2015) Practice‐based computing: Empirically‐grounded conceptualizations derived from design case studies. In Wulf, V., Schmidt, K., and Randall, D. (eds.), Designing socially embedded technologies in the real-world. London: Springer, 111–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, Volker, Rohde, Markus, Pipek, Volkmar, and Stevens, Gunnar (2011) Engaging with practices: Design case studies as a research framework in CSCW. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW 2011, 19–23 March 2011, Hangzhou, China. New York: ACM Press, 505–512.Google Scholar
Wulff, Elizabeth, Bridges, Donna, Bamberry, Larissa, and Krivokapic-Skoko, Branka (2022) Women who ‘talk the tools’ and ‘walk the work’: Using capital to do gender differently and re-gender the skilled trades. Journal of Sociology, 58(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyche, Susan, Dillahunt, Tawanna R., Simiyu, Nightingale, and Alaka, Sharon (2015) ‘If god gives me the chance i will design my own phone’: Exploring mobile phone repair and postcolonial approaches to design in rural Kenya. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 07–11 September 2015, Osaka, Japan. New York: ACM Press, 463–473.Google Scholar
Wynn, Eleanor (1979) Office communication as an information medium. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Yao, Zheng, Weden, Silas, Emerlyn, Lea, Zhu, Haiyi, and Kraut, Robert E. (2021) Together but alone: Atomization and peer support among gig workers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction 5 (CSCW), Article 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Julia and Plagnol, Anke C. (2022) Female computer science students: A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences studying computer science at university in the UK. Education and Information Technologies 27(3), 3079–3105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira (2006) Human/women’s rights and feminist transversal politics. In Ferree, M.M. and Tripp, A.M. (eds.), Global feminism: Transnational women’s activism, organizing, and human rights. New York: New York University Press, 275–295.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yingqin and Walsham, Geoff (2021) Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under Covid-19. Information and Organization 31(1), 100341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Jan (ed.) (1983) The technological woman: Interfacing with tomorrow. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Zhang, Ming and Yin, Yichun (2019) More Chinese women needed to hold up half the computing sky. In Proceedings of the ACM Turing Celebration Conference – China, May 17–19, 2019, Chengdu, China. New York: ACM Press, Article 69.Google Scholar
Zhou, Xiaomu, Ackerman, Mark S., and Zheng, Kai (2009) I just don’t know why it’s gone: Maintaining informal information use in inpatient care. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 4–9, 2009, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. New York: ACM Press, 2061–2070.Google Scholar
Zou, James and Schiebinger, Londa (2018) AI can be sexist and racist – It’s time to make it fair. Nature 559, 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs Books.Google Scholar
Zuin, Débora Carneiro (2013) Revisiting the study of occupations: A holistic view of contemporary secretarial work. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar