Pregnancy and Social Citizenship

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511627095.012

10 - Pregnancy and Social Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012

Joanna L. Grossman

Edited by

Linda C. McClain and

Joanna L. Grossman

Show author details

Linda C. McClain: Affiliation:
Boston University
Joanna L. Grossman: Affiliation:
Hofstra University, New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Pregnant workers and workers who are new mothers are, fundamentally, workers. They should not be relegated to second class citizenship in employee rights or benefits.

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act does not…require employers to offer maternity leave or take other steps to make it easier for pregnant women to work.

Introduction

Can pregnant working women capture the benefits of equal citizenship? Or do the physical effects of pregnancy, combined with the law's general failure to insist that they be accommodated, make that an elusive goal? This chapter takes up those questions by reconsidering pregnancy discrimination law through the lens of social citizenship.

Despite vital legislative and judicial victories that together had established a broad-based federal right of sex equality by the early 1970s, pregnant women continued to face myriad forms of discrimination in the workplace. During the campaign for and debate over the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978, advocates and legislators bandied about the familiar fear of second-class citizenship to argue for greater protection for pregnant women in the workplace. Like other important legislative enactments and of the same era, the central goal of the PDA was to promote women's equality by breaking down formal barriers to participation. At its core, this movement was a quest for equal social citizenship – access to paid work and economic security – for women.

Type: Chapter
Information: Gender Equality
Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship
, pp. 233 - 250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627095.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shklar, Judith N., American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991), at 4Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H., Class, Citizenship, and Social Development: Essays by T. H. Marshall (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1964), at 84Google Scholar

Bosniak, Linda, “Citizenship and Work,” 27 N.C. J. Int'l L. and Com. Reg.497, 500 (2001)Google Scholar

Gordon, Jennifer and Lenhardt, Robin, “Rethinking Work and Citizenship,” 55 UCLA L. Rev.1161, 1185 (2008)Google Scholar

Bosniak, Linda, The Citizen and the Alien (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006), at 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Grossman, Joanna, “Women's Jury Service: Right of Citizenship of Privilege of Difference?,” 46 Stan. L. Rev.1115 (1994)CrossRef Google Scholar

Karst, Kenneth L., Belonging to America: Equal Citizenship and the Constitution (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Ritter, Gretchen, The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the American Constitutional Order (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006), at 6Google Scholar

Forbath, William E., “Caste, Class and Equal Citizenship,” 98 Mich. L. Rev.1, 1 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Karst, Kenneth, “The Supreme Court 1976 Term – Foreword: Equal Citizenship Under the Fourteenth Amendment,” 91 Harv. L. Rev.1, 9 (1977)CrossRef Google Scholar

Schultz, Vicki, “Life's Work,” 100 Colum. L. Rev.1881, 1888 (2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Karlan, Pamela S. and Rutherglen, George, “Disabilities, Discrimination, and Reasonable Accommodation,” 46 Duke L. J.1, 25 (1996)CrossRef Google Scholar

Estlund, Cynthia, “Working Together: The Workplace, Civil Society, and the Law,” 89 Geo. L. J.1, 53 (2000)Google Scholar

Jauregui, Eddie A., “The Citizenship Harms of Workplace Discrimination,” 40 Colum. J. L. and Soc. Probs.347, 348 (2006)Google Scholar

McClain, Linda C., The Place of Families: Fostering Capacity, Equality, and Responsibility (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006), at 93Google Scholar

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, Men and Women of the Corporation (New York: Basic Books, 1977).Google Scholar

Fineman, Martha Albertson, The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency (New York: New Press, 2004), at 280Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie, The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home (New York: Viking Penguin, Inc., 1989)Google Scholar

Crittenden, Ann, The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World Is Still the Least Valued (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2002)Google Scholar

Silbaugh, Katharine, “Turning Labor into Love: Housework and the Law,” 91 Nw. L. Rev.1 (1996)Google Scholar

Tronto, Joan, “Care as the Work of Citizens: A Modest Proposal,” in Friedman, Marilyn, ed., Women and Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), at 131Google Scholar

Kessler-Harris, Alice, A Woman's Wage: Historical Meanings and Social Consequences (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1990), at 31–32Google Scholar

Bennetts, Leslie, The Feminine Mistake: Are We Giving Up Too Much? (New York: Voice/Hyperion, 2007)Google Scholar

Hirshman, Linda R., Get to Work: A Manifesto for Women of the World (New York: Viking, 2006), at 2Google Scholar

Flexner, Eleanor, Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States (New York: Atheneum, 1972), at 73Google Scholar

O'Leary, Ann, “How Family Leave Laws Left Out Low-Income Workers,” 28 Berkeley J. Emp. and Lab. L.1, 22 (2007)Google Scholar

Rhode, Deborah, Speaking of Sex: The Denial of Gender Inequality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), at 34Google Scholar

Kessler-Harris, Alice, Out to Work: A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), at 181Google Scholar

Cott, Nancy, The Bonds of Womanhood: “Woman's Sphere” in New England, 1780–1835 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Reskin, Barbara F. and Hartmann, Heidi I., eds., Women's Work, Men's Work: Sex Segregation on the Job (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986)

Williams, Wendy, “The Equality Crisis: Some Reflections on Culture, Courts, and Feminism,” 7 Women's Rts. L. Rep.175 (1982)Google Scholar

Williams, Wendy, “Equality's Riddle: Pregnancy and the Equal Treatment/Special Treatment Debate,” 13 N.Y.U. L. Rev. L. and Soc. Change325 (1985)Google Scholar

Krieger, Linda and Cooney, Patricia, “The Miller-Wohl Controversy: Equal Treatment, Positive Action and the Meaning of Women's Equality,” 13 Golden Gate U. L. Rev.513, 537–57 (1983)Google Scholar

Scales, Ann, “Towards a Feminist Jurisprudence,” 56 Ind. L. J.375, 426–30 (1981)Google Scholar

Brake, Deborah, “The Invisible Pregnant Athlete and the Promise of Title IX, 31 Harv. J. L. and Gender323 (2008)Google Scholar

Grossman, Joanna L., “Job Security Without Equality: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993,” 15 Wash. U. J. L. and Pol'y17 (2004)Google Scholar

Cantor, David et al., Balancing the Needs of Families and Employers: Family and Medical Leave Surveys 2000 Update (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 2000), at 3–2 to 3–3Google Scholar

Grossman, Joanna L. and Thomas, Gillian, “Making Pregnancy Work: Overcoming the Limits of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act's Capacity-Based Model,” 22 Yale J. L. & Feminism (2009)Google Scholar

Hollander, D., “Improving Work Situations During Pregnancy May Help Improve Outcome,” 32 Int'l Fam. Plan. Persp.156 (2006)Google Scholar

Hatch, Maureen et al., “Do Standing, Lifting, Climbing or Long Hours of Work During Pregnancy Have an Effect on Fetal Growth?,” 8 Epidemiology530 (1997)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Infante-Rivard, Claire et al., “Pregnancy Loss and Work Schedule During Pregnancy,” 4 Epidemiology73, 74 (1993)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnson, Julia Overturf and Downs, Barbara, ,U.S. Census Bureau, “Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns: 1961–2000,” Current Population Rep.70 (2005)Google Scholar

Smith, Kristin et al., ,U.S. Census Bureau, “Maternity Leave and Employment Patterns: 1961–95,” Current Population Rep.70 (2001)Google Scholar

Desai, Sonalde and Waite, Linda J., “Women's Employment During Pregnancy and After the First Birth: Occupational Characteristics and Work Commitment,” 56 Am. Soc. Rev.551, 560 (1991)CrossRef Google Scholar

Savitz, David A. et al., “Maternal Occupation and Pregnancy Outcome,” 7 Epidemiology269, 270 (1996)CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kay, Herma Hill, “Equality and Difference: The Case of Pregnancy,” 1 Berkeley Women's L. J.1, 26 (1985)Google Scholar

Book contents

10 - Pregnancy and Social Citizenship

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive