Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T17:51:37.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population structure studies and genetic variability in humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

L. B. Jorde
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This short review of human genetic structure deals with genetic distances, display techniques, F-statistics, new types of genetic data, and genetic data other than gene frequencies (migration, isonymy, anthropometry, and pedigrees). This treatment will not be comprehensive, and there are already several other reviews, some of which are more detailed (e.g., Cannings & Cavalli-Sforza, 1973; Fix, 1979; Goodman, 1974; Gower, 1972; Harpending, 1974; Howells, 1973; Jorde, 1980, 1985; Lalouel, 1980; Leslie, 1985; Relethford & Lees, 1982; Roberts, 1975; Smith, 1977; Swedlund, 1980). In addition, applications of many of these methods are contained in the volume by Crawford and Mielke (1982). Since the mathematical equations underlying these methods are readily available in other reviews and in the original papers, most are not repeated here.

GENETIC DISTANCE

Genetic distance measures can be grouped into five broad categories: chi-squared, angular transformation, and gene substitution distances, information measures and non-parametric measures. Each of these will be discussed briefly.

The chi-squared distances include those of Sanghvi (1953), Balakrishnan and Sanghvi (1968), Morton et al (1971), Harpending and Jenkins (1973), Reynolds et al (1983), Steinberg et al (1967), and Kurczynski (1970). All of these involve the calculation of a squared difference between gene frequencies in two populations and the standardisation of this difference. These approaches are most satisfactory when the differences between gene frequencies in subpopulations are not too large (Jorde, 1985).

The angular transformation distances (Edwards, 1971; Edwards & Cavalli-Sforza, 1972) use an arcsine transformation of gene frequencies in order to make the variances of the frequencies independent of the frequency values.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×