Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:17:09.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Significance of dermatoglyphics in studies of population genetic variation in man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

G. Hauser
Affiliation:
Histologisch-Embryologisches Institut der Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Of all human morphological traits, dermatoglyphics are practically unique in their stability in the face of changes in age and environment. Established in the third month of prenatal life, the intricate patterns of ridges on the fingers and toes remain constant (apart from growth in size) until death in old age, and only vary if there is severe trauma to the digit. The quantitative total ridge count is regarded as the most highly heritable of all human continuously varying characters, shown by comparison of the observed correlation coefficients between relatives of different degrees and those expected on a multifactorial hypothesis in which genetic determination is complete. This conclusion derives from the early work of Holt (1952, 1961, 1968) on families in Britain, but has recently also been demonstrated in tropical populations by Hreczko and Ray (1985). The modes of inheritance of individual pattern types, minutiae and other detailed features are still not fully established, but the numerous studies of twins, family members, and patients with chromosomal disorders show how strong is the genetic influence upon these.

There remains much to be done in mapping the distribution of dermatoglyphic features in tropical populations, though the map is far fuller today than it was twenty years ago. In digital features there appear to be frequency clines sweeping across the tropical areas, there appear to be differences between the major population groups inhabiting the tropics, and there appear to be quantum differences between small tropical populations ethnically different from their neighbours, as for example the differences between the Bushmen of the Kalahari or the pygmies of the Ituri Forest who are quite distinct from their later-coming Bantu neighbours (Hauser, 1977).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×