Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:51:57.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Global change and local places: lessons learned

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2009

Robert W. Kates
Affiliation:
University Professor Emeritus Brown University
Thomas J. Wilbanks
Affiliation:
Corporate Research Fellow and Leader of Global Change and Developing Country Programs Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
Ronald F. Abler
Affiliation:
Secretary General and Treasurer International Geographical Union
Get access

Summary

Four major questions have informed the Global Change and Local Places research agenda from its inception:

  • How do the dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions and their driving forces differ at local scale?

  • Can localities reduce their source contributions to global climate change?

  • How and where does scale matter? and

  • How can the capacity to study global change in localities be improved?

The project's major findings, insights, and lessons can be cast as answers to these four key questions and as three major observations regarding the ways the global and the local relate to each other, stated as variants of the familiar slogan Think globally and act locally.

How do the dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions and their driving forces differ at local scale?

The importance of attention to local scale lies not in uncovering differences in descriptions of greenhouse gas emissions by major categories, but in details that are often lost in larger aggregations. The details in question are often critical to designing effective mitigation strategies.

Overall, 1990 greenhouse gas emissions for the four study areas are significantly, but not greatly, different from global, national, and their respective state level emissions (Chapter 7). Local emissions differ moderately in the mix of greenhouse gases, somewhat more so in sources, and considerably more in total per capita and per square kilometer emissions. Carbon dioxide dominates the mix of greenhouse gases at our sites as it does nationally (Table 7.3).

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Change and Local Places
Estimating, Understanding, and Reducing Greenhouse Gases
, pp. 239 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appalachian State University Department of Geography and Planning. 1999. North Carolina's Sensible Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies. Boone, NC: Appalachian State University
Harrington, J. Jr., Goodin, D., and Hilbert, K.. 1997. Global Change in Local Places: Satellite Reflectance Data for Southwest Kansas. Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 20: 43–7Google Scholar
Kasperson, J. X., and R. Kasperson. 2001. International Workshop on Vulnerability and Global Environmental Change, 17–19 May 2001: A Workshop Summary. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute
Kates, R. W., Mayfield, M. W., Torrie, R. D., and Witcher, B.. 1998. Methods for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Local Places. Local Environment, 3 (3): 279–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lineback, N. G., Dellinger, T., Shienvold, L. F., Witcher, B., Reynolds, A., and Brown, L. E.. 1999. Industrial Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Does CO2 From Combusting of Biomass Residue Really Matter? Climate Research, 13: 221–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loretti, C. P., W. F. Wescott, and M. A. Eisenberg. 2000. An Overview of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Issues. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Margolick, M., and D. Russell. 2001. Corporate Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets. Arlington, VA: Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Soulé, P. T., and DeHart, J. L.. 1998. Assessing IPAT Using Production- and Consumption-Based Measures of I. Social Science Quarterly, 79 (4): 54–765Google Scholar
United States Global Change Research Program. 2000. Climate Change Impacts on the United States: The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Wilbanks, T. J. 2002. Scaling Issues in Integrated Assessments of Climate Change. In J. Rotmans and M. van Asselt, eds. Scaling Issues in Integrated Assessment. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger
Wilbanks, T. J., and Kates, R. W.. 1999. Global Change in Local Places: How Scale Matters. Climatic Change, 43: 601–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×