Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T15:06:03.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER TWO - Methodology I: Detecting and predicting grassland change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2019

By
Heather A. Hager  and
Jonathan A. Newman
Edited by
David J. Gibson  and
Jonathan A. Newman
David J. Gibson
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Jonathan A. Newman
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Grasslands and Climate Change , pp. 19 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2.6 References

Gibson, DJ. Grasses and grassland ecology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
Adler, PB, HilleRisLambers, J. The influence of climate and species composition on the population dynamics of ten prairie forbs. Ecology. 2008;89(11):3049–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, D, Waite, I, McNicol, J, Poulton, P, Macdonald, A, O’Donnell, A. Soil organic carbon contents in long‐term experimental grassland plots in the UK (Palace Leas and Park Grass) have not changed consistently in recent decades. Global Change Biology. 2009;15(7):1739–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, GL, Royer, DL, Lunt, DJ. Future climate forcing potentially without precedent in the last 420 million years. Nature Communications. 2017;8.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, AS, Bound, JA. Predictability and prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A. 1993;156(2):167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009;6(7):6.Google Scholar
Hager, HA, Newman, JA. Methodology I: Detecting and projecting grassland change: from plots to landscape. Scholars Portal Dataverse, http://dxdoiorg/105683/SP/7TYFGE. 2018.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, J, Hedges, LV. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology. 1999;80(4):1142–9.Google Scholar
Olson, DM, Dinerstein, E, Wikramanayake, ED, Burgess, ND, Powell, GVN, Underwood, EC, et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience. 2001;51(11):933–8.Google Scholar
Cadotte, MW, Mehrkens, LR, Menge, DNL. Gauging the impact of meta-analysis on ecology. Evolutionary Ecology. 2012;26(5):1153–67.Google Scholar
Vines, TH, Andrew, RL, Bock, DG, Franklin, MT, Gilbert, KJ, Kane, NC, et al. Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. FASEB Journal. 2013;27(4):1304–8.Google Scholar
Gibson, DJ, Austin, AT, Bardgett, RD, Rees, M, Baier, A, Sandhu, L. Journal of Ecology news. Journal of Ecology. 2014;102(1):1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, DR, Baldwin, JD. Editorial. Ecology. 2005;86:1.Google Scholar
Whitlock, MC. Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2011;26(2):61–5.Google Scholar
Roche, DG, Kruuk, LEB, Lanfear, R, Binning, SA. Public data archiving in ecology and evolution: how well are we doing? PLoS Biology. 2015;13(11).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dieleman, WIJ, Vicca, S, Dijkstra, FA, Hagedorn, F, Hovenden, MJ, Larsen, KS, et al. Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature. Global Change Biology. 2012;18(9):2681–93.Google Scholar
Wu, ZT, Dijkstra, P, Koch, GW, Penuelas, J, Hungate, BA. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Global Change Biology. 2011;17(2):927–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, E, Li, SL, Xu, WH, Li, W, Dai, WW, Jiang, P. A meta-analysis of experimental warming effects on terrestrial nitrogen pools and dynamics. New Phytologist. 2013;199(2):441–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMalach, N, Zaady, E, Kadmon, R. Contrasting effects of water and nutrient additions on grassland communities: a global meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2017;26(8):983–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, B, Andueza, D, Niderkorn, V, Luscher, A, Porqueddu, C, Picon-Cochard, C. A meta-analysis of climate change effects on forage quality in grasslands: specificities of mountain and Mediterranean areas. Grass and Forage Science. 2015;70(2):239–54.Google Scholar
Fu, G, Shen, Z-X, Sun, W, Zhong, Z-M, Zhang, X-Z, Zhou, Y-T. A meta-analysis of the effects of experimental warming on plant physiology and growth on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2015;34(1):57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M, Manning, P, Rist, J, Power, SA, Marsh, C. A global comparison of grassland biomass responses to CO2 and nitrogen enrichment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 2010;365(1549):2047–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rustad, L, Campbell, J, Marion, G, Norby, R, Mitchell, M, Hartley, A, et al. A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia. 2001;126(4):543–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sillen, WMA, Dieleman, WIJ. Effects of elevated CO2 and N fertilization on plant and soil carbon pools of managed grasslands: a meta-analysis. Biogeosciences. 2012;9(6):2247–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wand, SJ, Midgley, G, Jones, MH, Curtis, PS. Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta‐analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biology. 1999;5(6):723–41.Google Scholar
Wang, X, Liu, L, Piao, S, Janssens, IA, Tang, J, Liu, W, et al. Soil respiration under climate warming: differential response of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. Global Change Biology. 2014;20(10):3229–37.Google Scholar
Wellstein, C, Poschlod, P, Gohlke, A, Chelli, S, Campetella, G, Rosbakh, S, et al. Effects of extreme drought on specific leaf area of grassland species: a meta-analysis of experimental studies in temperate and sub-Mediterranean systems. Global Change Biology. 2017;23(6):2473–81.Google Scholar
Xu, WF, Yuan, WP, Dong, WJ, Xia, JZ, Liu, D, Chen, Y. A meta-analysis of the response of soil moisture to experimental warming. Environmental Research Letters. 2013;8(4).Google Scholar
Zhang, XZ, Shen, ZX, Fu, G. A meta-analysis of the effects of experimental warming on soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics on the Tibetan Plateau. Applied Soil Ecology. 2015;87:32–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, XH, Zhou, LY, Nie, YY, Fu, YL, Du, ZG, Shao, JJ, et al. Similar responses of soil carbon storage to drought and irrigation in terrestrial ecosystems but with contrasting mechanisms: a meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2016;228:70–81.Google Scholar
Underwood, N, Hambäck, P, Inouye, B. Large-scale questions and small-scale data: empirical and theoretical methods for scaling up in ecology. Oecologia. 2005;145(2):176–7.Google Scholar
Petersen, JE, Englund, G. Dimensional approaches to designing better experimental ecosystems: a practitioners guide with examples. Oecologia. 2005;145(2):215–23.Google Scholar
Srivastava, DS. Do local processes scale to global patterns? The role of drought and the species pool in determining treehole insect diversity. Oecologia. 2005;145(2):204–14.Google Scholar
Bausell, RB, Li, Y-F. Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
Kreyling, J, Schweiger, AH, Bahn, M, Ineson, P, Migliavacca, M, Morel-Journel, T, et al. To replicate, or not to replicate – that is the question: how to tackle nonlinear responses in ecological experiments. Ecology Letters. 2008;21(11):1629–38.Google Scholar
Meinshausen, M, Smith, SJ, Calvin, K, Daniel, JS, Kainuma, M, Lamarque, J-F, et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change. 2011;109(1–2):213.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×